Turkey continues to transfer troops and armored vehicles to Idlib

Turkey continues to transfer troops and armored vehicles to Idlib

Despite assurances of a desire to end the conflict in Idlib province by peaceful means, Turkey is actively transferring personnel, weapons and military equipment to Syrian territory. This was told by a military-diplomatic source.


Despite statements about the desire for diplomatic ways to resolve the conflict in Idlib, Ankara is actively transferring personnel, weapons and military equipment to the de-escalation zone

- leads RIA News source words.

Of particular concern is the fact that a significant part of the military equipment is being transferred to militants from pro-Turkish groups, including the “Jabhat al-Nusra” banned in Russia. According to the source, currently there are more than 70 deescalation zones in Idlib tanks, about 200 armored fighting vehicles and 80 field artillery guns deployed across the border by Turkey. Which part of them belongs to the militants is not known exactly.

In addition, it became known that, thanks to Turkish deliveries, American-made man-portable air defense systems got to the militants, which causes "deep concern". Whatever is said, but the Syrian Air Force has already lost two helicopters over militant-controlled territory. It is possible that they were shot down precisely by these MANPADS.

And where they will come up in the future, nobody in Ankara, and even less so in Washington, now knows

- said the source.

The source also said that Turkey is supplying the uniform of its army with militants of the Khayyat Tahrir al-Sham group banned in Russia and other pro-Turkish military units that, under the guise of the Turkish military, are attacking Syrian government forces.

Of particular concern are cases where Ankara has supplied militants in the Idlib de-escalation zone with the uniform of Turkish armed forces. (...) under the guise of Turkish troops, in military operations against government troops (...)

- said the source.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Terenin 15 February 2020 17: 57 New
    • 11
    • 2
    +9
    Of particular concern is the fact that a significant part of the military equipment is being transferred to militants from pro-Turkish groups, including the “Jabhat al-Nusra” banned in Russia.

    How will you take it back? fool Do you think the militants will drive up to the Turkish checkpoint and give the keys?
    1. bang 15 February 2020 18: 05 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      Is she really surrendering? Or is there a Turkish crew inside the vehicle?

      Of particular concern are cases where Ankara has supplied militants in the Idlib de-escalation zone with the uniform of Turkish armed forces. (...) under the guise of Turkish troops, in military operations against government troops (...)
      This is the move. Barmaleyev is not sorry and will always be an occasion to shout about the dead Turkish soldiers and bomb in response.
      1. Paul Siebert 16 February 2020 08: 00 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Is she really surrendering? Or is there a Turkish crew inside the vehicle?

        But this, really - a question of questions!
        It’s one thing to get an armored car - every man can do it, most of them were driving.
        What if it's a tank? Not everyone has a tractor or a bulldozer at the entrance ...
        Get me out - put me in the tower, the effect is zero, I’ll have to learn.
        Is there time? Around - war ...
        I have at least an engineering education ... repeat And the idlibian goats?
        So, it seems to me that this technique is with a Turkish gasket between the seat and levers ... wink
    2. Sergey39 15 February 2020 18: 59 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Quote: Terenin
      How will you take it back?

      CAA come in handy!
    3. Karaul73 15 February 2020 20: 56 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Nobody will take it. Yes, and they will not give. Weapons will be used to the full.
  2. Guards turn 15 February 2020 18: 01 New
    • 21
    • 25
    -4
    The Russian Su-34s destroyed three Turkish MLRS, which attempted to launch a large-scale attack on the Khmeimim airbase, and the Turkish military, tried to strike on the Khmeimim airbase, hiding behind the militants.

    The night before, Turkish troops, using Turkish-made MLRS that arrived in Syria a few days ago, tried to launch a missile attack on the Russian military base Khmeimim, hiding behind the legend that these were terrorist actions. When deployed directly in the Al-Kabin area, Russian fighters delivered an unexpected blow, turning the Turkish MLRS into a pile of scrap metal and thereby foiling an attack on the Russian air force base.
    According to some reports, in the area from which Turkish troops tried to attack the Khmeimim airbase, there were at least three T-122 Sakarya MLRS, which together would make it possible to fire at least 120 missiles at the Russian military airbase. Given the fact that the attack was thwarted, and the Turkish side has not yet commented on the charges of trying to strike at the Khmeimim airbase, experts believe that the preparation for the attacks was possible thanks to an unmanned aerial vehicle.
    1. Guru 15 February 2020 20: 00 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Guard Turn (Andrey)
      Russian Su-34 destroyed three turrets MLRS Turkey
      - LINK TO THE STUDIO
      1. krot 15 February 2020 20: 05 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Guru
        - LINK TO THE STUDIO

        On Yandex Zen there was an article that you can believe 50 percent no more .. Today I read. no It would be true, they would have already trumpeted all the channels.
        1. flicker 16 February 2020 12: 36 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          It would be true, already on all channels would blow
          Trumpeting is not profitable for either the Turks or us.
          Infa went to the "airpro". The grounds for doubt, of course, are BUT ...
          But, on an interactive map of military operations (and this is another source), a blow of Russian landmasses near the borders of Latakia and Idlib was noted. Al-Kibina district is there, not far from Salma.
          Besides, aren't the terrorists (who tried to attack Khmeimim with drones more than once) or the Turks disguised as terrorists capable of such actions?
          They are quite capable.
          So infa is more like the truth than fiction.
      2. Guards turn 15 February 2020 20: 05 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        Read more at: http://avia.pro/news/rossiyskie-su-34-unichtozhili-tri-rszo-turcii-kotorye-pytalis-nanesti-masshtabnyy-udar-po
        1. rich 16 February 2020 01: 48 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Andrey, I welcome youhi
          avia.pro is not a site you can trust. When tracking articles on Avia.Pro, there is informational provocation in the interpretation of events. And this leaves a very unpleasant feeling. IMHO - this is a common pro-Western site. No more, no less. Not much information for you:

          You are not the first to be minus for the "news" from this site. Many colleagues with VO came across this.
          Best regards
          Dmitriy
          1. flicker 16 February 2020 12: 44 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            But the site can not publish only fakes, sometimes you need the truth.
            But, an interactive map (and this is another source !!!) showed that Russian dryers bombed the area on the border of Latakia (where there were no active battles). And this area is exactly where Al-Kibiny is. So infe is more likely to be believed than to doubt.
            Or do you think that conscience will not allow the Turks (or terrorists)?
  3. Guards turn 15 February 2020 18: 07 New
    • 13
    • 33
    -20
    “Turkey, goodbye!”: Russia sent strategic bombers to Syria to bomb Idlib
    It became known about sending strategic bombers to Syria.

    The media reported that against the backdrop of the confrontation between Russia, Turkey and Syria, strategic bombers were urgently deployed to the Arab Republic, which, at last, would put an end to pro-Turkish terrorists and destroy the locations of hundreds of tanks, armored personnel carriers and jet multiple launch rocket systems.

    "Sources in Syria have just reported deploying in Syria the most advanced Russian bomber capable of arming itself with hypersonic missiles with nuclear warheads," Veterans Today, a Western information publication, reports. “Russia directly stated to Erdogan that she would not negotiate with terrorists. If Turkey helps the militants, then Russia will help Syria. Should we expect a powerful bombardment by Russian "strategists"? Absolutely! ”, The specialist notes.

    It should be clarified that earlier Russian Tu-22 bombers already took part in delivering attacks on the territory of Syria - during a special operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces it was possible to destroy large formations of Islamic State terrorists (terrorist group banned in Russia - approx. Ed.).
    Read more at: http://avia.pro/news/turciya-davay-do-svidaniya-rossiya-otpravila-v-siriyu-strategicheskie-bombardirovshchiki-bombit
    1. carstorm 11 15 February 2020 18: 11 New
      • 32
      • 4
      +28
      never bring this source) there are some fakes with it stupid and for the same as their authors clowns.
    2. papandopala 15 February 2020 18: 35 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Quote: Guards turn
      “Turkey, goodbye!”: Russia sent strategic bombers to Syria to bomb Idlib
      It became known about sending strategic bombers to Syria.

      The media reported that against the backdrop of the confrontation between Russia, Turkey and Syria, strategic bombers were urgently deployed to the Arab Republic, which, at last, would put an end to pro-Turkish terrorists and destroy the locations of hundreds of tanks, armored personnel carriers and jet multiple launch rocket systems.

      "Sources in Syria have just reported deploying in Syria the most advanced Russian bomber capable of arming itself with hypersonic missiles with nuclear warheads," Veterans Today, a Western information publication, reports. “Russia directly stated to Erdogan that she would not negotiate with terrorists. If Turkey helps the militants, then Russia will help Syria. Should we expect a powerful bombardment by Russian "strategists"? Absolutely! ”, The specialist notes.

      It should be clarified that earlier Russian Tu-22 bombers already took part in delivering attacks on the territory of Syria - during a special operation of the Russian Aerospace Forces it was possible to destroy large formations of Islamic State terrorists (terrorist group banned in Russia - approx. Ed.).
      Read more at: http://avia.pro/news/turciya-davay-do-svidaniya-rossiya-otpravila-v-siriyu-strategicheskie-bombardirovshchiki-bombit

      Avia about not only foreign weapons and the military scum, BUT OURS, ALSO, SHOULD BE HIDDEN TO COVER THESE FAKOVERS
      1. protoss 15 February 2020 19: 57 New
        • 4
        • 5
        -1
        Avia about those still science fiction writers, speedinfos and rents have a rest.
    3. Guru 15 February 2020 20: 01 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      Goodbye Troll laughing am
    4. Avior 15 February 2020 21: 55 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Never heard of such a publication.
      I climbed into the Internet - and what did I see?
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans_Today
      I’m silent about avia.pro, those are also fake ...
      Maybe you should wait until someone else confirms?
      hi
  4. stalki 15 February 2020 18: 08 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    It smells of singing. And next to the gas is siphon. I would like to believe that our meeting with the Turks will cool their "imperial ambitions." Dashing everything is spinning. The balance is swinging too much.
    1. Oquzyurd 15 February 2020 18: 28 New
      • 6
      • 33
      -27
      "imperial ambitions")))? Who? Think again.
      1. stalki 15 February 2020 18: 32 New
        • 16
        • 4
        +12
        "imperial ambitions")))? Who? Think again.
        You need to think about it, pull yourself up so to speak. And everything will become clear at once lol
        1. Oquzyurd 15 February 2020 18: 46 New
          • 3
          • 23
          -20
          "And everything will become clear right away lol" It is clear that you have taken great pains, but still did not think. winked
          1. stalki 15 February 2020 18: 54 New
            • 12
            • 2
            +10
            "And everything will become clear right away lol" It is clear that you have taken great pains, but still did not think.
            Um, I realized it’s very difficult for your head to roll back, yes, it’s incurable. hi I can’t help you.
            1. Oquzyurd 15 February 2020 19: 14 New
              • 8
              • 31
              -23
              "very difficult for your head somersault, yes, it is incurable" Justify this somersault with your healed head:
              1. Who accepted 4-5 million refugees from Syria?
              2. Which of the present countries in Syria has a land border with this country?
              3. Do these countries that do not have borders with Syria accept at least 1 thousand people from Syria?
              3. In the territories of which of these countries does the threat emanate from the territories of Syria?
              Now think again about who has imperial ambitions.
              1. stalki 15 February 2020 19: 32 New
                • 28
                • 2
                +26
                1. Who accepted 4-5 million refugees from Syria?
                2. Which of the present countries in Syria has a land border with this country?
                3. Do these countries that do not have borders with Syria accept at least 1 thousand people from Syria?
                3. In the territories of which of these countries does the threat emanate from the territories of Syria?
                Now think again who has imperial ambitions
                Who dared to enter the territory of Syria as to his home, who unleashed a confrontation on his border for purely imperial purposes, for the supply of militants and acting on the orders of the FSE, who wants to squeeze out a piece of land, who is a provocateur, Russia? Syria, which wants to regain control of the legitimate territory of the country? Are refugees hiding? They did not expect anything else from them. They know how to shoot in the back.
                1. Oquzyurd 15 February 2020 19: 52 New
                  • 10
                  • 24
                  -14
                  You didn’t answer any of the questions. Slogans and cliches, and it’s clear that they didn’t gather here for discussion. It’s a pity, minus signists.
                  1. Yeraz 15 February 2020 20: 06 New
                    • 9
                    • 13
                    -4
                    Quote: Oquzyurd
                    A pity, minus.

                    There are pluses here pluses wink
                    1. Oquzyurd 15 February 2020 20: 24 New
                      • 6
                      • 12
                      -6
                      I know, thanks)
                  2. stalki 15 February 2020 20: 08 New
                    • 10
                    • 3
                    +7
                    You didn’t answer any of the questions. Slogans and cliches, and it’s clear that they didn’t gather here for discussion. It’s a pity, minus signists.
                    What are the slogans, which countries? You took aside, even off-topic questions were asked. We are not discussing either Israel or Iraq or the others, we are discussing the Turks and their intrigues. Refugees, by the way, are a large part of the Turkish-motivated mass, and with them terrorists. Nobody asked them to flee to Turkey, and then to Europe; they themselves wanted to. Everyone who considers himself a Syrian, with Assad on one side, none of them wanted to go to Idlib.
                    1. Oquzyurd 15 February 2020 20: 32 New
                      • 5
                      • 7
                      -2
                      "even off-topic questions were asked." Very much on the topic. If for you this is not a topic, it does not mean that it does not exist.
                      “We are not discussing either Israel or Iraq” Strange, where did you see such a text?
                      “Everyone who considers himself a Syrian, with Assad on one side, none of them wanted to go to Idlib.” What kind of logic is this? The Syrian is everywhere Syrian, and not necessarily Asadovets.
                      1. stalki 15 February 2020 20: 46 New
                        • 5
                        • 2
                        +3
                        "even off-topic questions were asked." Very much on the topic. If for you this is not a topic, it does not mean that it does not exist.
                        “We are not discussing either Israel or Iraq” Strange, where did you see such a text?
                        “Everyone who considers himself a Syrian, with Assad on one side, none of them wanted to go to Idlib.” What kind of logic is this? The Syrian is everywhere Syrian, and not necessarily Asadovets.
                        You think so, we also have a lot of "Russians" in the revolutionary period fled to Europe and beyond. Those who remained faithful to their homeland returned, those who thought it was right to forget about Russia, they thought they were Russian. AND? Thinking and counting is one thing, and being is another. I didn’t utter the word “Asadovets” by the way and didn’t mean adherence to it, but I mean healthy patriotism and it doesn’t matter who is at the helm in this historical period.
                        P.S. Actually, you asked about the neighboring countries.
                  3. RVAPatriot 15 February 2020 20: 29 New
                    • 12
                    • 2
                    +10
                    They wouldn’t write nonsense, there wouldn’t be any minuses .... A country on its territory cannot restore order ???
                    1. Sadam 15 February 2020 21: 10 New
                      • 2
                      • 4
                      -2
                      I agree with you. own territory that they want and do something.
                      What is the difference between Donetsk? here I see here I wrap a herring))
                  4. The comment was deleted.
                2. shahor 15 February 2020 23: 32 New
                  • 1
                  • 4
                  -3
                  Quote: stalki
                  Who dared to enter the territory of Syria as to their home,

                  Well, you would be interested in the essence of the matter before stigmatizing angrily. In 1998, Syria and Turkey signed the Amanat Treaty, according to which Turkey indisputably received the right to send troops into Syrian territory in case of threats to Turkish security. All clear? Turkey acts in accordance with a bilateral treaty.
                  1. Liam 15 February 2020 23: 42 New
                    • 3
                    • 0
                    +3
                    Quote: shahor
                    Quote: stalki
                    Who dared to enter the territory of Syria as to their home,

                    Well, you would be interested in the essence of the matter before stigmatizing angrily. In 1998, Syria and Turkey signed Amanat an agreement under which Turkey indisputably gained the right to send troops into Syria in the event of threats to Turkish security. All clear? Turkey acts in accordance with a bilateral treaty.

                    You, too, would first of all take an interest before copying. There is no Amanat agreement.
                    There is an Adan agreement. I suspect that you are not particularly aware of what is written there even if you don’t know the correct name
                    1. shahor 15 February 2020 23: 53 New
                      • 1
                      • 3
                      -2
                      Quote: Liam
                      I suspect that you are not particularly in the subject of what is written there

                      It says exactly what I said.
                      1. Liam 16 February 2020 00: 02 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: shahor
                        It says exactly what I said.


                        В Amanat Treaty maybe it’s written ... in the Adana agreement, not quite
                  2. stalki 15 February 2020 23: 51 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Well, you would be interested in the essence of the matter before stigmatizing angrily. In 1998, Syria and Turkey signed the Amanat Treaty, according to which Turkey indisputably received the right to send troops into Syria in case of threats to Turkey’s security. All clear? Turkey acts in accordance with a bilateral treaty
                    I do not know if you deliberately made a reservation regarding the Adan agreement, but the root of Amanat in the old sense is nothing more than a hostage. Syria was forced to sign this document. And by the way, where did you see compliance by the Turks in the execution of this agreement?
                    Is helping terrorists the security of Turkey? By agreement, she is obliged to eliminate them.
                    1. shahor 16 February 2020 00: 27 New
                      • 0
                      • 2
                      -2
                      Quote: stalki
                      Is helping terrorists the security of Turkey?

                      Turks believe that refugees from Idlib, whose number is close to a million, threaten the country's security. They blame the Assad regime for this, which, in violation of the Sochi accords, launched an offensive over the line of Turkish observation posts. From the side of the Syrians, not everything is so simple and simple. First, they made a colossal, catastrophic mistake. Having seized territories controlled by the militants, they broke up mass graves and began to take selfies against the background of the remains. I do not give a legal assessment, but the social networks on BV exploded! The Alawites (read Shiites) desecrated Sunni graves. Sunni Turks. It is necessary to explain what may follow. What new facets will the conflict play in? And further. In the Syrian leadership itself, tear. Bashar focuses on Russia. His brother, the commander of 4 corps, on Iran. I can not reliably say, but some media in the BV write that it was from the military personnel of this corps that there was a leak of data on the route of movement of Russian special forces. Why this was done, I do not want to discuss. They will figure it out. But the goal of the anti-Russian group in Syria now is to push the foreheads of Russia and Turkey. So more exposure and less high-profile calls. Everything will be formed.
                      1. stalki 16 February 2020 07: 38 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        I already wrote about refugees from Idlib who they really are, read carefully.
                        From the side of the Syrians, not everything is so simple and simple. First, they made a colossal, catastrophic mistake. Having seized territories controlled by the militants, they broke up mass graves and began to take selfies against the background of the remains.
                        at the expense of "fighters", are you out of your mind? Terrorists, just like that, not fighters. They built hell on a foreign land, with the filing of Fshe and Turkey, and they are now fluffy, because their graves were torn up? Do you even think what to write? Terrorists are destroying the country's population, stealing resources, seizing land, sponsored and supplied just for the sake of war. And should someone spare their graves when they smash temples? What planet are you from?
                      2. shahor 16 February 2020 13: 11 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: stalki
                        Terrorists destroy the country's population, steal resources, seize land, are sponsored and supplied just for the sake of war

                        Quoting newspaper clichés is not a sign of independent thinking.
                      3. stalki 16 February 2020 14: 15 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quoting newspaper clichés is not a sign of independent thinking.
                        Of course I only pretend to think laughing here I’m not using a training manual. Read laziness lol
              2. The comment was deleted.
                1. shahor 16 February 2020 13: 13 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: maidan.izrailovich
                  What has Syria violated?

                  Syria violated the Sochi agreements and, contrary to Russia's opinion, launched an offensive over the line of Turkish observation posts on the demarcation line.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. ananias mudishev 15 February 2020 22: 48 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            In Europe there are many refugees from Syria
  • knn54 15 February 2020 18: 15 New
    • 5
    • 13
    -8
    You might think that ONLY the Turks supply the barmalei.
    1. stalki 15 February 2020 18: 25 New
      • 12
      • 2
      +10
      You might think that ONLY the Turks supply barmaley
      and, let’s let’s supply? Plus minus a dozen, another tank in your opinion is normal, right?
    2. ML-334 15 February 2020 18: 32 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Only the Turks will rake it and it’s unlikely that something will crawl back
  • Mountain shooter 15 February 2020 18: 32 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    So far, concentration is not critical. More demo ... And the videoconferencing is quite tough. Well, the Turks should not have bullied ... They would have dealt with Syria Assad. And with Syria plus Hmeimim - I think not. Erdogan "raises the stakes", this may indicate that his affairs as a political leader are bad ... so there are also Kurds ...
    1. Kronos 15 February 2020 18: 44 New
      • 5
      • 13
      -8
      And why Russia doesn’t have much strength in Syria, if military operations begin, they can destroy the base in Khmeimim because there are more forces at the bottom
      1. 1976AG 15 February 2020 20: 13 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Quote: Kronos
        And why Russia doesn’t have much strength in Syria, if military operations begin, they can destroy the base in Khmeimim because there are more forces at the bottom

        Of course they can, but it will already be a direct armed conflict with Russia, and with our weapons in order to give a good answer to the Turks there is no need to keep a lot of forces in Syria.
        1. Kronos 15 February 2020 20: 14 New
          • 6
          • 10
          -4
          I mean, Russia is unlikely to go to fight Syria with Turkey in the same way as with Israel
          1. 1976AG 15 February 2020 20: 16 New
            • 12
            • 5
            +7
            Quote: Kronos
            I mean, Russia is unlikely to go to fight Syria with Turkey in the same way as with Israel

            So no longer fight for Syria, but for our military base in Syria. And this is a completely different matter!
    2. Old Michael 15 February 2020 18: 53 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Erdogan "raises the stakes", this may indicate that his affairs as a political leader are bad ... so there are also Kurds ...

      Maybe it's time (until on Monday we sat down at the negotiating table) publicly inform the Turks that, in violation of their own obligations, heavy weapons were found at the bases of the Nusra and other terrorist forces. And if Turkish soldiers are present there, then they should be lowered within the next 6 hours, because in these 6 hours ...
      It will be difficult for Erdogan to shift responsibility to Syria or Russia.
      1. Thunderbolt 15 February 2020 21: 15 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        So far, concentration is not critical. More demo ...

        The Turks support their barmaley with quite live firing of MLRS and long-range artillery. According to the international protocol, the Turks close the zone of straits for their opponents, if such are announced. Say what other object on the Syrian territory is shot from the Turkish border?
        1. Mountain shooter 15 February 2020 21: 37 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Say what other object on the Syrian territory is shot from the Turkish border?

          And remember such a strange terrorist attack when a bus with Turkish pilots was blown up ... After we shot down our dryer. He wasn’t particularly advertised, such as a Kurd, a car with explosives ... Do you think the hint did not reach Erdogan?
          1. Thunderbolt 15 February 2020 22: 20 New
            • 2
            • 1
            +1
            I got it. Therefore, in the very places where fighting is taking place, a Russian attack aircraft was shot down / a pilot died heroically, showed the creatures their place and how the Russians are fighting ../ It was stated that the troops controlling it from the MANPADS were shot down. There would be nothing, but there are two points
            1.) These units are created and sponsored by the state of Turkey. Turkish troops are part of their units under the guise of undercover military advisers and the so-called "playing trainers" when skilled fighters fight in irregular units. This gives these semi-partisan formations greater stamina and the training process is not in isolation from production, if war can be called production of cripples and corpses .... However, this is philosophy, now in we’ll go into such wilds, so SHA!
            2.) 2 days before the Russian attack aircraft were shot down, the Turkish Foreign Minister gave a “lengthy” interview, in which he indicated, in particular, that the Idlib zone is in their area of ​​interest, and the fighting was called by Syrian rebels bravely fighting for their rights.
            Well ... third ... probably the most important ..... You may have noticed that only Assad inflicts air strikes. The Russian Air Force is constrained by the position of Turkey.
            1. Mountain shooter 15 February 2020 22: 33 New
              • 3
              • 1
              +2
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Well ... third ... probably the most important ..... You may have noticed that only Assad inflicts air strikes. The Russian Air Force is constrained by the position of Turkey.

              Turkish aviation does not even try to fly abroad ... Who is fettering whom?
              1. Thunderbolt 15 February 2020 23: 32 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Quote: Mountain Shooter
                Turkish aviation does not even try to fly abroad ... Who is fettering whom?
                Reply

                Quote: Mountain Shooter
                Turkish aviation does not even try to fly abroad ... Who is fettering whom?
                Reply
                Three hundred military forces are binding them, ours is completely. But the radar support is probably coming from the posts advanced from Khmeimim, that means there is a Polyana station in our division / probably it was included in the division’s command post and it merges the entire radar information into the command and control staff from the command and control unit from the Department of Management The division. True, in 24/7 mode, the division is not adapted to fight, but that means the batteries are pulled to the front line and the combat expectation is carried out on a battery basis. I note that there is even more than one battery. If it starts to work, the signal "Alarm !!!" and the personnel of other batteries rises from their seats and takes jobs. You don’t have to go far. As a rule, they slept there .... Fortunately, Soviet designers well provided conditions for crew rest. In the overalls "winter tank" you go to the rear compartment of the radar Ki and do not care frost === chopped off immediately. The GUNs are simpler there ---- you throw your head at the dashboard and wash beautiful dreams ..... until the first word ...... and this word was not like in the Bible, but different. "ANXIETY!!!"
              2. shahor 15 February 2020 23: 38 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                Quote: Mountain Shooter
                Turkish aviation does not even try to fly abroad ... Who is fettering whom?

                The Turks declared airspace over Idlib a no-fly zone. They warned that they would bring down everyone. Does the presentation begin?
        2. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 22: 23 New
          • 3
          • 2
          +1
          Quote: Thunderbolt
          Say what other object on the Syrian territory is shot from the Turkish border?

          I know that Ankara shoots well from the Crimea. And you forgot the geography, right?
          1. Thunderbolt 15 February 2020 22: 54 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Hmeimim is an overseas expeditionary territory of Russia. There is a flag fluttering on the flagpole because Russia is carrying out a special international mission in that region. All military operations are agreed by the parties. This is a highlight and some “understatement” of the Cold War wars, which continues.
            A blow to Ankara is already a different level. When you opened fire on Ankara, you took into account that this is the sovereign territory of another state / there will be questions at the UN / and a member of the NATO bloc?
            Our airfield in Syria does not fully meet the requirements of territoriality, which is why the Strategic Missile Forces and other parts of the triad only carry out combat duty. Being in the highest degree of readiness, these guys are waiting for only one thing --- ORDER !!! But such an order will not be received in Ankara, because nuclear parity..s. Only Assad, only hardcore, I’m sadly joking .... Of course, in the forefront are now all the best minds of our General Staff, gunners and intelligence fighters with elite Russian infantry. But in the air, NATO has dominance-superiority. what operational effect Hmeimim’s work would have in the “non-stop” mode on clusters of militants. their reference points and supply communications. But this does not happen --- they "mixed up" their forces with a purely Turkish army. The air forces did not enter completely, because . Our troika-1 army was pulled into this area and it is now in ambush reckoning a possible F flight of sixteen. The Turks are well aware of this and are forced to support their motorized infantry brigades mainly with transport helicopters. Something already ...
            1. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 23: 16 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              Opening fire on the city of Ankara, you took into account

              Yeah, I took everything into account. In which case - Ankara to dust. This is the only way out.
              Only you did not change the training manual when answering me - I did not say a word about the Strategic Missile Forces. Spread conventional.
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              .Of course, in the forefront now all the best minds of our GS

              I don’t know how it is in your General Staff, but in ours, plans for a war with Turkey should have been gathering dust for decades. So it is arranged - our General Staff - just in case of probable aggressors pre-works.
            2. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 23: 32 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              Quote: Thunderbolt
              НАТО

              You have to be stupid enough not to understand that NATO does not exist to protect the United States, but to protect the United States.
              Tomorrow the Baltic States will completely wane and attack the Kaliningrad region, and we will let drool - they say they are in NATO? Should I sacrifice Kaliningrad?
              Everyone understands everything perfectly. And if the roof of Erdogan is torn off, his yesterday’s allies will disown his corpse faster than he cools down.
              1. Thunderbolt 16 February 2020 00: 12 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣
                Only you did not change the training manual when answering me - I did not say a word about the Strategic Missile Forces. Spread conventional.
                Quote: Thunderbolt
                You obviously don’t take into account that Turkey is sitting under a nuclear umbrella. You can throw it with ordinary charges, though there are not enough forces for this, / even if you transfer two additional Iskander divisions and shoot all the available missile ammunition in Russia. This is possible only in parallel with the Turkish Navy bristles with the release of their ships and all aviation rises. At the same time they can react on duty from the Romanian airfield and all the coastal countries of NATO. In German Ramstein, hundreds of turbines will be flooded with hellish fire, which will be prepared by the American rafters for Russian gorodov.sudorozhno typing in his intro computer zagaduchnuyu combination of letters.
                In common sense, no one in the city of Ankara will jerk. Nuclear parity is doing its job. Nobody is taking over Belarus. The army and the rest of Kyrgyzstan, because legally, the Russian boys came to the UN and said --- don’t hush !!! ". At the same time, an ugly American cowboy spoke from the UN rostrum. He called his circle of interests --- Turkey is part of it. unfortunately ...
  • Demagogue 15 February 2020 18: 33 New
    • 16
    • 3
    +13
    A counter strike began from the north on the dushmans at Aleppo from the territory of the Kurds. Highway 62 is cut from the south, and from the north, the last road for departure at Jabal.
  • Operator 15 February 2020 18: 36 New
    • 12
    • 5
    +7
    Everything goes the way - the Turks, by agreement with Russia, have the right to be in Idlib only on the territory of their observation posts (with the exception of transport convoys on the roads), all other weapons located outside their perimeter are a legitimate target for the Russian Aerospace Forces.
    1. protoss 15 February 2020 19: 54 New
      • 3
      • 10
      -7
      Is it written right here? Do not bother to give a source?
  • Thrifty 15 February 2020 19: 00 New
    • 14
    • 3
    +11
    By such actions, the Turks untied the hands of both the Syrian army and our Air Force! Now it doesn’t matter whether in the military uniform of the Turkish army, or in your dressing gown, you shoot towards the military from Syria, you are subject to immediate liquidation.
    1. Kronos 15 February 2020 19: 35 New
      • 7
      • 7
      0
      And if the Turks begin to shoot and shoot down these same Air Force?
      1. Thrifty 15 February 2020 19: 43 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Kronos-then the nefik to distribute his military uniform to the militants, and supply them with weapons! The very first our military plane shot down, taking into account the fact that the militants are in Turkish military uniforms, unties us anyway and obliges us to respond harshly, destroying the Turkish military equipment, and the Turkish military!
      2. Genry 15 February 2020 20: 36 New
        • 6
        • 5
        +1
        Quote: Kronos
        And if the Turks begin to shoot and shoot down these same Air Force?

        Then Russia has the right to strike Istanbul ...
        1. protoss 15 February 2020 20: 59 New
          • 6
          • 16
          -10
          Quote: Genry
          Then Russia has the right to strike Istanbul

          then NATO gets the right to hit Moscow ...
          Well, why do we need this exchange?
          1. Genry 15 February 2020 21: 07 New
            • 7
            • 6
            +1
            Quote: protoss
            then NATO gets the right to hit Moscow ...

            Then Russia has the right to strike the USA ...
            So let the US restrain its sultan.
            1. protoss 15 February 2020 21: 24 New
              • 7
              • 13
              -6
              Are you ready to sacrifice Moscow for Bashar al-Assad?
              me not.
              1. Genry 15 February 2020 21: 27 New
                • 6
                • 5
                +1
                Quote: protoss
                Are you ready to sacrifice Moscow for Bashar al-Assad?
                me not.

                And what does Assad have to do with it?
                Russia defends its interests. It’s worth it to bend once and everyone will have you ...
                1. protoss 15 February 2020 21: 30 New
                  • 5
                  • 13
                  -8
                  our specific interest there is the preservation of Asad, so what about.
                  you answer a question
                  1. Genry 15 February 2020 21: 35 New
                    • 5
                    • 7
                    -2
                    Quote: protoss
                    our specific interest there

                    Russia's interests are primary. Assad just happened to be there.
                    1. protoss 15 February 2020 21: 46 New
                      • 6
                      • 12
                      -6
                      oh how! That's great. I have nothing to add here. wassat
                      and you ignore uncomfortable questions, well, God bless you, I, in fact, do not care
                      1. Genry 15 February 2020 22: 10 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        Quote: protoss
                        and you ignore uncomfortable questions

                        I can’t understand, you just narrowly see one Assad?
                        Replace it and Russia will continue to defend its interests in Syria and everywhere ...
                      2. protoss 15 February 2020 22: 12 New
                        • 3
                        • 8
                        -5
                        drove through, agios
            2. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 22: 39 New
              • 6
              • 2
              +4
              Quote: protoss
              are you ready to sacrifice Moscow for Bashar al-Assad

              We know that the United States is not ready to sacrifice itself for Erdogan.
        2. Mountain shooter 15 February 2020 21: 40 New
          • 14
          • 4
          +10
          Quote: protoss
          then NATO gets the right to hit Moscow ...
          Well, why do we need this exchange?

          Wangyu, NATO will be stuck in the bushes faster than a hare. There will be many screeching, zero actions!
          1. protoss 15 February 2020 21: 42 New
            • 6
            • 10
            -4
            And if not? so-so lottery.
            1. Mountain shooter 15 February 2020 21: 55 New
              • 7
              • 4
              +3
              Quote: protoss
              And if not? so-so lottery

              Nonsense. Rule of special forces - do not threaten weapons. Bared the barrel - shoot! And then "pap-puff-puff" and all ...
            2. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 22: 44 New
              • 5
              • 3
              +2
              Quote: protoss
              And if not?

              Then someone will go to heaven, and someone will simply die (s). But the probability of this major event is so small that it is more than acceptable. Otherwise, you can not go out on the street, fearing to end your life under the car - there’s more probability there.
    2. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 22: 37 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Quote: Kronos
      And if the Turks begin to shoot and shoot down these same Air Force?

      Buyan-M, locking somewhere along the Volga-Don canal, as a hello, will turn the residence of the Sultan into a pile of wreckage. Figuratively, of course, speaking.
  • Vladimir Mashkov 15 February 2020 19: 16 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    The Turks are feverishly trying to prevent the defeat of the militants. It became finally clear that the Turks used them to maintain their occupation of the Syrian territories.
  • Prahlad 15 February 2020 19: 42 New
    • 0
    • 7
    -7
    We also have to put the equipment, then we can easily break the Turks
  • protoss 15 February 2020 19: 52 New
    • 1
    • 12
    -11
    Of particular concern is the fact that a significant part of the military equipment is being transferred to militants from pro-Turkish groups, including the “Jabhat al-Nusra” banned in Russia

    Well, this organization has not existed for a long time, unless the Turks invented the time machine.
    1. Nastia makarova 17 February 2020 08: 04 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      no name but the militants of this group remained
  • Reserve buildbat 15 February 2020 20: 30 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    It remains only to wish them to group themselves together and not scatter to be the easiest target for aviation. Actually, the Turkes and other mattresses are occupiers and, quite frankly, bandits. Subject to physical destruction.
  • Maalkavianin 15 February 2020 22: 03 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    The stupid war has begun. When there were terrorists, no one really knew who it was and what kind of enemy, but they beat it. Joyfully reported. Now there is a specific enemy - Turkey, threatening our fighters and killing them and? And silence ... Here's how they will reckon with our country if we constantly endure insult after insult? It is clear that Turkey is in NATO. It is clear that they can fit in for her. It is clear that it threatens a big war. But what now? Are they afraid of everyone?
    1. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 23: 06 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Malkavianin
      It is clear that they can fit in for her.

      This is exactly what the Janissaries are trying to force themselves to believe, so that their knees do not coward when walking on foreign land.
      Normal people understand that if something happens, the American arms lobby will simply cast a monument to Putin from gold and put it in his back yard to sacrifice to him a part of the super profit that fell on them after the destruction of Turkey.
      We have sanctions and a lot of stink. It will become more difficult for our officials to add capital over a hill.
      NATO reinforcement and reformation.
      That's all.
    2. protoss 16 February 2020 00: 00 New
      • 0
      • 6
      -6
      we lowered ourselves to the level of Assad, Greens and Kurds. none of the external participants for the time being entered this war personally and with obligations, all acted through proxy forces. our proxies are Asadites, Turkish - Turkomans and various Islamic groups, American - Kurds, Iranian - again, Asadites, Hezbis and all sorts of mercenaries from the Middle East. we were the first to start, having officially entered Syria at the official level, although it was possible to confine ourselves to Chevrons. incidentally, Iran did not. now the rest also have the right to participate directly on the side of their wards.
  • aiden 15 February 2020 22: 12 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Our VKS today leveled the Turkish point from where the Syrian helicopter was shot down from the MANPADS. I can not throw off the video from the teogram. And there’s nothing to look at. Ruins alone
  • We_smart 15 February 2020 22: 43 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Oquzyurd
    "very difficult for your head somersault, yes, it is incurable" Justify this somersault with your healed head:
    1. Who accepted 4-5 million refugees from Syria?
    2. Which of the present countries in Syria has a land border with this country?
    3. Do these countries that do not have borders with Syria accept at least 1 thousand people from Syria?
    3. In the territories of which of these countries does the threat emanate from the territories of Syria?
    Now think again about who has imperial ambitions.


    1. Do not accept.
    2. Do not attend.
    3. see para. 1
    4. (3) What was asked then? Syria threatens Syria? To herself? But, I realized, on the contrary, the territory of Syria threatens Syria? Not that again. Something I do not understand, explain.
  • lvov_aleksey 15 February 2020 22: 56 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    infuriates the word "oil"!
    1. Geo⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣ 15 February 2020 23: 08 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Have you seen white oil? Oil is a multifaceted and wonderful thing. You should remember about oil every time, if only when for your good an internal combustion engine is started or when you pick up plastic products.
  • shahor 15 February 2020 23: 43 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Thunderbolt
    with elite Russian infantry.

    About the elite of the Russian infantry smiled ... Parts of the military police from the Chechen and Ingush Rosgvardeytsy and police, well, yes, you can say, Putin's foot soldiers (R. Kadyrov).
  • Sarkazm 15 February 2020 23: 57 New
    • 3
    • 6
    -3
    Despite assurances of a desire to end the conflict in Idlib province by peaceful means, Turkey is actively transferring personnel, weapons and military equipment to Syrian territory. This was told by a military-diplomatic source.

    Where does this infa come from? ... Again, our “fool turned on”? ... Today is February 15, hey people, people-and-and !!! - You must be accustomed to our idle breeds, unaccustomed to the politicians who speak and do - READ OUT. We were told that we were warned to the last, but we had a wind in our ears and they did us, US is not someone else, not aliens.
    And again the wind in the ears - the people, Erdogan made a statement, this is not a gag and impromptu, they consult both at home and with their allies - our probable "friends".
    You can’t take the “weak” Turks, their leadership in every way and with actions shows that it will not play according to our rules and play along when we naively turn on the fool. Specifically, in Syria, and in Libya, the Turks have an enormous advantage and are able to realize it.
    We, saying “we” mean our authorities, hope to pull the Turks by the nose and take the largest possible territory by the end of February, putting the Turks in front of the facts and saying they won’t get into a conflict with us - WRONG. Vyiput and vyiput in full.
    Erdogan already accused Russia of Libya, just an hour ago, the interview was directly saying that all of our independent PMCs are managed by our Ministry of Defense and the General Staff, this is a hint, more likely in the context of the situation in Idlib and very transparent that our tales about the fact that "Assad himself has decided and is leading the offensive" is not for the Turks.

    Erdogan needed us, obviously he did not count on us as allies, but he hoped to find support, including in the confrontation with the EU and the USA. If we look at everything through the eyes of the Turks and take into account all that we promised, we are scammers. So, I think, on this, if we do not calm down, they will say goodbye to us and only begin to work more closely with China, since they have so many common projects, including through military-technical cooperation. Something the Turks will take in Ukraine now, they are already cooperating with Belarus, and if we mess up with Minsk now, their cooperation with the Turks will only be closer. The same Buk-MB 3K air defense systems are of interest not only to a couple of CIS countries, former partners of the USSR, but also to the same Turks, Turks already use MZKT, etc., etc.

    IMHO, we make the mistake of going to confrontation and throwing the Turks. Firstly, it tactically comes around to us, most likely we are waiting for the sad news from Syria, and in the long run is not the right decision.
    1. Kronos 16 February 2020 00: 11 New
      • 0
      • 4
      -4
      What kidalovo Turks are we talking about? They did not fulfill their words on Idlib for a long time the Syrians have all the rights to take their territory
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. Kronos 16 February 2020 01: 24 New
          • 0
          • 4
          -4
          If there were communists, it was still possible to argue, but in the opposition there are only different types of Islamists who establish their own far worse orders than Assad. I do not deny that the reasons were only everywhere where the Arab spring passed was much worse than before. If you are talking about an attack on a US base by Iran in which no one died, then this is a clean contract without victims, but supposedly avenged
          1. Sarkazm 16 February 2020 01: 51 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Regarding the “contractual match” - I would like to emphasize that the contractual match is the weakness of the United States, not Iran ... And the amers had the intelligence to understand what would be hit and come out with a minimum of losses and damage. Are we smart enough?
            Iran or Turkey, for example, this is not Ukraine, a state with conditional sovereignty and statehood in general, like many other ex-USSR republics, it is not Georgia, although in both cases it was not easy for us and it was not an easy walk, mothers got bumps.
            Turkey is a state and a sovereign state, and under Erdogan its sovereignty was further strengthened. Turkey is our neighbor, Turkey is a promising market for us, Turkey divorced or distant from NATO is security for us. And what about Syria? Put on the scales ... What are the interests of the country, including us and the interests of our oligarchs, who, as always, will withdraw all capital over the hill without leaving a dime here? ... Soviet Russia helped the Turkish Republic, the USSR helped and supported during the crisis around Cyprus, when ALL NATO countries sided with Greece, in those days we had no fools where to go. Due to only the latter, we have built dozens of factories in Turkey, and not for free ...

            PS At that time, when the USSR was building factories, the young interpreter Vova Zhirinovsky, who went on an internship and wanted to curry favor, handed a couple of badges with Lenin to the worker, for which he tried balandas in a Turkish jail. Another feature is that the Turks still forbid the images of Lenin, Marx and Engels so far, while the Communist Party and Marxists are underground. Until now, passwords, appearances, searches, arrests, etc., are all serious. But apart from the left, the Islamists, including Erdogan, were also almost underground, also went through a similar one, and through pressure, and through landings, etc. It is naive to believe that the local neo Koba is dumber or more cowardly than our Joseph Vissarionovich, you need to defend your own, but not to lose the Turks, we will not be allies in the full sense of the word, it is important for us not to become enemies.
  • parkello 16 February 2020 00: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    started erdogadit slowly recourse tomorrow they will raise their fighters ... Peter the Great was right sad
  • Dikson 16 February 2020 03: 18 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    How is it not known where they will come up, these MANPADS? Around Hmeimim they will emerge ... what is there to guess ..