How to visually distinguish the "strategist" Tu-160M ​​from the previous version: details are indicated

24

A few days ago, Russian media outlets were circulated, which featured a new modification of the domestic strategic bomber, which received the designation Tu-160M. Images of the aircraft attracted the attention of the expert community, in the ranks of which they began to recognize the visual features of the machine.

The modernized car made its first flight on February 2 of this year, which caused increased interest of journalists.



We can all play a little, trying to find the differences between the Tu-160 and Tu-160M

- suggested in the Spanish-language blog charly015.blogspot.ru, which closely follows the latest Russian military-industrial complex.

As one of the distinguishing details indicated the front of the aircraft. One of the equipment is missing here - the optoelectronic sight OPB-15T "Thunderstorm". On previous versions of the “strategist,” it allowed accurate bombing in conditions of poor visibility, which testified to high-quality brightened optics and a photosensitive camera matrix.

The tail section of the aircraft is equipped with a new electronic warfare system, which has a more massive look. On this basis, the new modification can be easily distinguished from previous Tu-160M ​​aircraft.


How to visually distinguish the "strategist" Tu-160M ​​from the previous version: details are indicated
  • https://twitter.com/charly0153
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -3
    February 14 2020
    Oh, these foreigners!
    Curious Barbara in the market nose tore!
    After a number of years, they will all become Tu-160M.
    1. +9
      February 14 2020
      Quote: Victor_B
      After a number of years, they will all become Tu-160M.

      After a number of years we will have PAK YES. As for the 160th, in any case, whether it is version 160M or 160M2, there will not be much (quantitatively), because it is expensive and extremely technological. At the same time, it is no longer necessary to break through the enemy’s air defense in the presence of X-101/102 and in the future X-50, due to the radius of which, there is no need to enter the air defense coverage area. And on the way, an upgraded version of the X-101 with an increased range.
      1. +4
        February 14 2020
        Quote: NEXUS
        After a number of years we will have PAK YES.

        Meant that all combatant Tu-160 will undergo modernization.
      2. +1
        February 14 2020
        What to guess, it all depends on what winds blow at the top, and we can only wait humbly.
      3. +2
        February 14 2020
        Yes sir. However, the carriers for the Kh-101/102, whose range is about 5 km, are (and in the foreseeable future will be) "Bear" and "Swan". The latter just needs to "throw a grenade and disappear into the fog, folding his wings." The most unpredictable circumstances may arise.
      4. -1
        February 14 2020
        Quote: NEXUS
        After a number of years we will have PAK YES. And as for the 160th, in any case, whether it is version 160M or 160M2, there will not be many (quantitatively), because it’s expensive

        Do you think that PAK YES will be cheaper?
        1. -3
          February 14 2020
          Quote: Piramidon
          Do you think that PAK YES will be cheaper?

          I don’t think anything, since I haven’t seen PAK YES in hardware. Maybe it will be cheaper, who knows ...
          1. -1
            February 14 2020
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: Piramidon
            Do you think that PAK YES will be cheaper?

            I don’t think anything, since I haven’t seen PAK YES in hardware. Maybe it will be cheaper, who knows ...

            Yes, here, in principle, and do not need to know. When with us, and not only with us, the new was cheaper than the old.
        2. 0
          February 14 2020
          PAK YES is cheaper by definition, as there is no supersonic sound. However, the cheapness of domestic projects is often (especially recently) lost against the background of the costs of their implementation. I assume that the price of the "finished product" will be at the level of Tu-160M ​​(M2)
  2. 0
    February 14 2020
    There will be nothing to distinguish with such a rate of modernization for several years. But they "promised" to modernize all Tu-2025s by 160, build 50 Tu-160M2s and put PAK DA on the conveyor.
    1. +2
      February 14 2020
      Something has not been heard recently about intentions to build 50 new Tu-160Ms. Maybe they abandoned this crazy idea and therefore found money for 76 Su-57?
      1. +1
        February 14 2020
        Quote: bars1
        Something has not been heard recently about intentions to build 50 new Tu-160Ms.

        There will be no 50 TU-160s ... the USSR mastered about 30 pieces and then, in the most bready times, it produced 4 160s a year. And there was industry, science, specialists and a base. God forbid, if we are able to produce 2 TU-160 per year. Plus, the price of this device is not at all small. In the USSR, it cost about 200 lyamas of Soviet parrots, that is, now, the price is close to 200-250 lyamas of American parrots.
        1. +2
          February 14 2020
          So far, only on paper:
          During this year, the Accounts Chamber of Russia will verify the assembly program of the strategic missile carrier Tu-160 White Swan and its models. This is stated in the list of upcoming plans of the department.
    2. +6
      February 14 2020
      Why so much 160M ??? And who ever promised ???
    3. +1
      February 14 2020
      Yeah, and TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND jobs, and three-room apartment, THIS PROMISED 2020. Storytellers, only they have no faith ........................
  3. -2
    February 14 2020
    Is this a guide for spies, or what? recourse
    1. +6
      February 14 2020
      This is the "blogosphere"! Sofa troops. Sometimes they bang better than the Tu-160M. I would like to mine them, break coal, but for them the keyboard is softer. hi
      1. +3
        February 14 2020
        What kind of mine is there, but how to break coal when beer and stockfish are on hand. wassat
        1. PN
          0
          February 14 2020
          Do you think the Spaniards use beer with dried fish?
          1. 0
            February 14 2020
            The Russian company easily.
    2. +2
      February 14 2020
      Yes, there is nothing to snoop on the good. The usual awareness as a result of erudition and observation, even some students are now well versed in such details.
  4. +1
    February 14 2020
    Yeah, show me everything and tell you!
  5. -1
    February 14 2020
    And I peer into the sky, and I just can’t deny it
    1. 0
      February 15 2020
      At what height?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"