NATO Secretary General spoke about the response of the alliance to the deployment of Russian missiles

30
NATO Secretary General spoke about the response of the alliance to the deployment of Russian missiles

The Alliance will respond to Russia's deployment of new generation cruise missiles, including 9M729. This was announced on Thursday by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg.

Speaking at a press conference following the meeting of ministers of NATO member countries, Stoltenberg, answering journalists' questions, explained that the alliance’s response to the deployment of new Russian new generation cruise missiles provides for "strengthening the missile defense system, as well as expanding the nuclear and conventional strike potential of the alliance" .



Another response to Russian missiles will be an increase in the number and scale of NATO exercises in Europe, including near Russian borders. In addition, the alliance will come up with new initiatives in the field of arms control, both conventional and mass destruction.

Of course, Stoltenberg did not forget to once again remind reporters that NATO does not intend to deploy nuclear cruise missiles in Europe, in contrast to the "treacherous" Russia, which, in the light of its "aggressive" policy, secretly produces and deploys such missiles on European territory.

Earlier, the NATO secretary general accused Russia of continuing to “develop and deploy” new missiles that violate the provisions of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate and Shorter Range Missiles. However, he did not provide any concrete evidence for his statement.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    13 February 2020 17: 04
    Another answer to Russian missiles will be increasing the number and scale of NATO exercises ...

    From now on, Latvia and Estonia will put up for training not one, but two soldiers each. Double increase. crying
    1. +5
      13 February 2020 17: 09
      They will respond with hypersonic sanctions. For more strength and steel Faberge is not enough.
    2. +8
      13 February 2020 17: 13
      Oh, this Stoltenberg. The storyteller is worse than Andersen. lol
      1. +1
        13 February 2020 17: 51
        Something with his memory became .... I forgot .. about missile defense in Romania and Poland .. at the borders of Russia
      2. +4
        13 February 2020 19: 29
        How did Baby answer Carlson ??? - Listen, but you are ill! This NATO Secretary General is really sick.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  2. 0
    13 February 2020 17: 05
    as well as the expansion of the nuclear and conventional strike capabilities of the alliance "

    Boo-ha-ha .... laughing
    And where, let me ask, does NATO have a nuclear component? The wind blew? Or rely on striped partners?
    Some megalomania .... You won’t have time to fart, if you jerk.
    Not .. Well, statements to do - please .... Tryndet - not tossing bags ....
    1. +5
      13 February 2020 17: 11
      Quote: KOT BYUN
      The wind blew?

      American In addition to France - they have their own, but the French this circus of freaks does not seem to have stuck anywhere.
    2. +13
      13 February 2020 17: 11
      And where, let me ask, does NATO have a nuclear component?

      Great Britain and France have Trident and M5 SLBMs, respectively. Plus UR ASMP-A. This is only for "personal" use.
      1. +4
        13 February 2020 17: 15
        Quote: lexus
        UK

        It cannot be said about the British that they have "Tridents" for personal use, they alone cannot dispose of them.
      2. +2
        13 February 2020 17: 37
        And in which case, how many minutes will evil go to Britain and France to exist? smile Dare they try to use any rockets ??? But what if Sergei thinks when they conventionally launch a missile that it is nuclear and presses a few buttons ??? Only total id ..... t in France and the Evil of Britain would try to shoot a rocket in Russia !!! laughing laughing laughing
  3. +3
    13 February 2020 17: 09
    Jens Stoltenberg
    Verbal diarrhea is perfectly treated with 9M729.
    Just one click of a button.
  4. +1
    13 February 2020 17: 09
    smile I'm generally confused. Who is responsible for whom? Some kind of carousel. This natA sabsem became bad.
    1. +6
      13 February 2020 17: 16
      Quote: Captive
      Who is responsible for whom?

      NATO bites its tail and, feeling pain, vindictively bites its tail again.
  5. +3
    13 February 2020 17: 11
    Of course, Stoltenberg did not forget to once again remind reporters that NATO does not intend to deploy nuclear cruise missiles in Europe, in contrast to the "treacherous" Russia, which, in the light of its "aggressive" policy, secretly produces and deploys such missiles on European territory.
    A rocket itself is a carrier of either a simple charge or a nuclear one. The largest storage facilities for NATO nuclear weapons are in Germany, France, and Britain. These warheads can at any time be attached to carriers aimed at the territory of Russia. Ger Ger Stoltenberg is silent about this on his blue eye. And military exercises near the borders of the Russian Federation are a direct provocation, which is fraught with sad consequences for the entire globe.
  6. +2
    13 February 2020 17: 14
    The Alliance will respond to Russia's deployment of new generation cruise missiles,

    First, create the same "partners", and then answer ..
    The USA is ten years behind us in such developments .. Catch up with the gentlemen!
    And your AUGs are no longer afraid of anyone in the world ..
  7. +1
    13 February 2020 17: 14
    NATO does not intend to deploy nuclear cruise missiles in Europe
    At one time, Pershing 2 carried a much greater threat than Axes, for example.
  8. +1
    13 February 2020 17: 25
    NATO already has a sea-based CD "above the roof" and has an advantage in the number of CDs and their carriers and in tactical aircraft and corr weapons on them.
    While the advantage is on their side.
    1. +1
      13 February 2020 17: 30
      Quote: Zaurbek
      While the advantage is on their side.

      Well, in Syria, I remember they showed their "advantage" in the Kyrgyz Republic, they released a hundred and no special damage.
      Here their fear at the expense of Russian lionfish of the latest development .. That's what worries them! They don’t have such and in the next 10 years are not expected .. hi
      1. 0
        13 February 2020 17: 47
        As they fired, they showed .... our Analog-Caliber .... flies + - the same ..... only the TsU will be weaker.
  9. +2
    13 February 2020 17: 38
    And if something happens, how many minutes will the evil of Britain and France exist? Dare they try to use any rockets ??? And what if Sergei thinks when they lancer the conventional missile that it is nuclear and presses a few buttons ??? Only total id ..... t have France and the Evil Britain would try to shoot a rocket in Russia !!!    laughing laughing laughing
    1. +3
      13 February 2020 17: 49
      Jens is just chatting !!! laughing It’s only interesting to me that he really believes that NATO in Europe will be able to do something and dare ??? Jens technology is gone 75 years from now it is not WWII !!! Who will try to shoot one of these tiny slave states in Europe in Russia with a rocket or in the Ruska army, even conventional, how can Sergei know that the rocket is not nuclear ??? And will Sergey dare to wait ???
      Dumb you Jens like a hammer !!!
      laughing
      1. +4
        13 February 2020 17: 52
        Or, as Jens came up with ?, an evil shave on a cell phone calls Sergey and they say, Seryozha is flying an ordinary rocket, please do not shoot a nuclear one? laughing laughing laughing
  10. +1
    13 February 2020 17: 58
    In short, he answered like this: boo, boo, boo. Who is he? Talking weak-willed and powerless head without brains.
  11. +2
    13 February 2020 17: 58
    However, he did not provide any concrete evidence for his statement.
    Who would have doubted. At the "gentlemen's club" there, take your word for it. laughing And such a concept as facts probably remained only in the Russian language. When they are asked, "Gentlemen, where are the facts?" Western politicians make a strange expression. sad
  12. +1
    13 February 2020 18: 15
    Another response to Russian missiles will be an increase in the number and scale of NATO exercises in Europe

    Maybe we should start conducting exercises in Cuba, in Venezuela, in Vietnam ... so to speak, closer to the borders of the exceptional?
  13. 0
    13 February 2020 18: 15
    Quote: maidan.izrailovich
    Another answer to Russian missiles will be increasing the number and scale of NATO exercises ...

    From now on, Latvia and Estonia will put up for training not one, but two soldiers each. Double increase. crying


    If it continues to go at the same gigantic pace, then soon the combined Baltic platoon will be formed.
  14. 0
    13 February 2020 18: 43
    In general, we, like Syria, are forbidden to defend ourselves.
  15. +1
    13 February 2020 23: 25
    They can bark at us as much as they like, conducting their teachings and building a missile defense system near the borders, and I will simply quote one famous ensign: “We fuck, we must, we all, the whole world is in ruin, but not now”
  16. 0
    13 February 2020 23: 57
    It is clear. And what would they answer to the test of the "Tsar Bomb" on Novaya Zemlya?
  17. +1
    14 February 2020 05: 50
    And this one writes all the tales about the Russian threat.