United States gears up for deal with Taliban


The administration of Donald Trump suggests that she will succeed in concluding a deal with the Taliban Afghan movement banned in Russia (banned in the Russian Federation). There, this document is called the "agreement to reduce violence."


This was reported by the American television channel CNN, referring to two officials of the military department.

A possible deal involves a ceasefire between coalition forces led by the United States and the Taliban and is the first step towards a peace agreement.

Officials interviewed by reporters on the channel expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the agreement. The reason is that the Taliban leadership cannot vouch for the actions of supporters of the movement in different parts of Afghanistan and guarantee the observance of the deal. In addition, Afghan youth in the Taliban may respond to calls from the Islamic State, which is banned in the Russian Federation, and continue to attack US military facilities.

Earlier, the Taliban leaders said they were ready for inter-Afghan negotiations, subject to the withdrawal of US troops from the country. Actually, Donald Trump is also in favor of reducing the number of his military in Afghanistan and, possibly, their subsequent complete withdrawal. The United States intends to significantly reduce military contingent regardless of the results of negotiations with the Taliban.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

31 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Lamata 12 February 2020 12: 44 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Violence Reduction Agreement !!! what kind of liberal democratic nonsense. Especially in Afghanistan, with the mentality of its population.
    1. Shurik70 12 February 2020 12: 45 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      The strength of the Taliban lies in the autonomy of their cells.
      The Taliban are almost impossible to destroy.
      But this leads to the fact that it is impossible to agree with them.
      Whatever agreements some Taliban cells have signed, there will always be those who have not signed.
      1. bessmertniy 12 February 2020 12: 52 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        The agreement can be signed as much as you like. The question is different - who will carry it out? It is unlikely that the Taliban, who foiled it one agreement with their own government, will fulfill the agreement with the Americans. what
        1. orionvitt 12 February 2020 13: 20 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: bessmertniy
          It is unlikely that the Taliban, who foiled it one agreement with their own government, will fulfill the agreement with the Americans.

          Tricky question. And how many agreements have not been complied with, or are the Americans themselves simply frustrated? In order to believe the states nowadays, even a word, even in writing, you need to be a very naive person. There is always a reason to break something, blaming the opposite side for this, dumping everything from the "sick head to the healthy". I agree, the Taliban is not a gift. But who in this region has been stirring up water for more than two hundred years? Such to itself, the Anglo-Saxon relay race.
          1. Vladimir B. 12 February 2020 13: 40 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: orionvitt
            To believe the states these days

            Nowadays, believe the United States, do not respect yourself.
            Quote: orionvitt
            Taliban is not a gift.

            but apart from them, nobody seems to have real power in Afghanistan.
        2. Sergey39 12 February 2020 13: 21 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Now let the amas sit there. The longer the better. They are negotiating, concluding impracticable agreements, pulling rubber, spending resources, pulling off the forces of the Taliban. We are only better.
      2. Lamata 12 February 2020 12: 54 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        I agree with you.
      3. Lamata 12 February 2020 12: 55 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        It is truth too.
      4. To be or not to be 12 February 2020 13: 54 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Lure. In the best case, they will throw ... in the worst .... that was repeatedly ..
  2. Chervonny 12 February 2020 12: 49 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    I don’t think that something will work out with the negotiations. The Americans want one thing, the Taliban agree only on inter-Afghan negotiations. The war in Afghanistan will continue ...
  3. Nikolay87 12 February 2020 12: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It's funny, today the first episode of the 8th season of the series Homeland was released, the theme is Afghan. Coincidence? laughing
  4. Maestro Alexander 12 February 2020 12: 51 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    This liberalism does not even make any sense in the name of the “document”.

    No terrorist deals should be made with terrorists! They must be burned with napalm to the ashes from the last sole!
    1. orionvitt 12 February 2020 13: 23 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Although they are terrorists, but for the states, they are their own terrorists. How are they going to burn their napalm? And who in the region will stir up the water?
      1. Maestro Alexander 12 February 2020 13: 28 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        This is the background of my statement. Obviously, whoever (the Taliban) "feeds, drinks, dresses, and supplies slingshots" ...
    2. ML-334 12 February 2020 13: 29 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      And who rushed into someone’s house with “values” and “democracy”, burst into your house and start planting democracy as I understand it, but if you’re against napalm, then what?
      1. Maestro Alexander 12 February 2020 13: 31 New
        • 0
        • 3
        -3
        ML-334, convey your thoughts more clearly.
        1. ML-334 12 February 2020 13: 45 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Well, at the moment I’m for the Taliban — at home, why burn them with napalm?
  5. businessv 12 February 2020 12: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The United States intends to significantly reduce military contingent regardless of the results of negotiations with the Taliban.
    Unfortunately, in minke whales, intentions and actions are usually very different from each other! They have already taken out of Syria. Almost brought out. Not far, true.
  6. Same lech 12 February 2020 12: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Funny in Russia, the Taliban has been recognized as a terrorist organization since 2013 ...
    it’s strange like that ... don’t rush it.
    It turns out that the United States is conducting formal ceasefire negotiations with a terrorist organization ... what they couldn’t destroy and suppress and are now forced to make a deal ... this can only be in one case if the Taliban is supported by its own people.
  7. Cowbra 12 February 2020 12: 58 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Aya-yai-yay ... See what happens! And according to its own rules, the United States must impose sanctions on itself. for cooperation with terrorists ...
  8. rocket757 12 February 2020 13: 03 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Donald Trump’s administration suggests that it will be able to secure a deal with the Taliban-banned Afghan movement in Russia

    Somehow they want to agree there and there. Ha, ha, let's see.
    1. Gene84 12 February 2020 13: 44 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Quote: rocket757
      see

      The United States will not do anything with the negotiations. The Taliban will not go to negotiations.
      1. rocket757 12 February 2020 14: 06 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Afghanistan, the cemetery of empires ...
        In general, the Yankees of different transactions started a whole cart ... you can arrange a sweepstake, how many times they break off!
  9. rotmistr60 12 February 2020 13: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Possible deal.
    Surprisingly, the definition of a trader in international relations is firmly entrenched in American life and is picked up by politicians in many countries. Trump dismissed his tail before the election - here, and the “deal” on BV without asking the Palestinians, now decided to conclude a “deal” with the Taliban. But this time it is not he who will throw (deceive) those with whom he makes a deal, but he will be thrown and decently.
  10. knn54 12 February 2020 13: 09 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The Taliban long for power and a truce with the Kabul government will not, do not recognize any coalitions.
    Moreover, they are Pashtuns, and in power are representatives of the multinational Northern Alliance.
    As the author correctly noted, IS is becoming more and more popular among young people. Al Qaeda is also not losing ground. The latter, however, recognize the supremacy of the Arabs over the rest, which affects the growth of their supporters, especially among the middle generation.
  11. Thrifty 12 February 2020 13: 09 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Is the United States so simple and they will give the Taliban their opium plantations? belay I do not believe! !!
  12. Rostislav 12 February 2020 13: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Donald Trump is also in favor of reducing the number of troops in Afghanistan and, possibly, their subsequent complete withdrawal.

    Fresh tradition ...
    And who will protect the poppy?
  13. Romanenko 12 February 2020 13: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This type of newly signed collective agreement and individual labor agreements?
    They themselves created this gang, and now they are organizing a circus with the signing of documents.
    They would call the director (the leader) and all decide amicably.
  14. Ros 56 12 February 2020 14: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What do stripy bake start in Afghanistan? Whether it still will be, in my opinion the wars did not end there. But no, in my opinion in the first half of the last century it was somehow quiet.
  15. Kontuzia 12 February 2020 16: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    We know these deals, drug trafficking will be shared again .. From space, Afghanistan is covered in red spots of poppy plantations ..
  16. Astra55 13 February 2020 01: 26 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Preparing for the deal.
    Will they move a drug together?