United States gears up for deal with Taliban

The administration of Donald Trump suggests that she will succeed in concluding a deal with the Taliban Afghan movement banned in Russia (banned in the Russian Federation). There, this document is called the "agreement to reduce violence."

This was reported by the American television channel CNN, referring to two officials of the military department.

A possible deal involves a ceasefire between coalition forces led by the United States and the Taliban and is the first step towards a peace agreement.

Officials interviewed by reporters on the channel expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the agreement. The reason is that the Taliban leadership cannot vouch for the actions of supporters of the movement in different parts of Afghanistan and guarantee the observance of the deal. In addition, Afghan youth in the Taliban may respond to calls from the Islamic State, which is banned in the Russian Federation, and continue to attack US military facilities.

Earlier, the Taliban leaders said they were ready for inter-Afghan negotiations, subject to the withdrawal of US troops from the country. Actually, Donald Trump is also in favor of reducing the number of his military in Afghanistan and, possibly, their subsequent complete withdrawal. The United States intends to significantly reduce military contingent regardless of the results of negotiations with the Taliban.

Comments

[Lamata]

Violence Reduction Agreement !!! what kind of liberal democratic nonsense. Especially in Afghanistan, with the mentality of its population.

[Shurik70]

The strength of the Taliban lies in the autonomy of their cells.
The Taliban are almost impossible to destroy.
But this leads to the fact that it is impossible to agree with them.
Whatever agreements some Taliban cells have signed, there will always be those who have not signed.

[bessmertniy]

The agreement can be signed as much as you like. The question is different - who will carry it out? It is unlikely that the Taliban, who foiled it one agreement with their own government, will fulfill the agreement with the Americans.

[orionvitt]

Quote: bessmertniy

It is unlikely that the Taliban, who foiled it one agreement with their own government, will fulfill the agreement with the Americans.

Tricky question. And how many agreements have not been fulfilled, or have the Americans themselves simply thwarted? In order to believe the states in our time, even a word, even in writing, you need to be a very naive person. They always inflate an excuse to violate something, accusing the opposite side of it, dumping everything from "a sick head to a healthy one." I agree, the Taliban are not a gift. But who has muddied the waters in this region for over two hundred years? Such an Anglo-Saxon relay race.

[Vladimir B.]

Quote: orionvitt

To believe the states these days

Nowadays, believe the United States, do not respect yourself.

Quote: orionvitt

Taliban is not a gift.

but apart from them, nobody seems to have real power in Afghanistan.

[Sergey39]

Now let the amas sit there. The longer the better. They are negotiating, concluding impracticable agreements, pulling rubber, spending resources, pulling off the forces of the Taliban. We are only better.

[Lamata]

I agree with you.

[Lamata]

It is truth too.

[To be or not to be]

Lure. In the best case, they will throw ... in the worst .... that was repeatedly ..

[Chervonny]

I don’t think that something will work out with the negotiations. The Americans want one thing, the Taliban agree only on inter-Afghan negotiations. The war in Afghanistan will continue ...

[Nikolay87]

It's funny, today the first episode of the 8th season of the series Homeland was released, the theme is Afghan. Coincidence?

[Maestro Alexander]

This liberalization does not make any sense even in the name of the "document".

Not "deals" should be made with terrorists! It is necessary to burn them with napalm to ashes from the last sole!

[orionvitt]

Although they are terrorists, but for the states, they are their own terrorists. How are they going to burn their napalm? And who in the region will stir up the water?

[Maestro Alexander]

This is the reason for my statement. Obviously, who (the Taliban) "feeds, drinks, dresses, and supplies them with slingshots" ...

[ML-334]

And who to whom has burst into the house with "values" and "democracy", I will break into your house and start to spread democracy as I understand it myself, and if you are against napalm you, so what?

[Maestro Alexander]

ML-334, convey your thoughts more clearly.

[ML-334]

Well, at the moment I’m for the Taliban — at home, why burn them with napalm?

[businessv]

The United States intends to significantly reduce military contingent regardless of the results of negotiations with the Taliban.

Unfortunately, in minke whales, intentions and actions are usually very different from each other! They have already taken out of Syria. Almost brought out. Not far, true.

[Same lech]

Funny in Russia, the Taliban has been recognized as a terrorist organization since 2013 ...
it’s strange like that ... don’t rush it.
It turns out that the United States is conducting formal ceasefire negotiations with a terrorist organization ... they couldn’t destroy and suppress and are now forced to make a deal ... this can only be in one case if the Taliban is supported by its own people.

[Cowbra]

Aya-yai-yay ... See what happens! And according to its own rules, the United States must impose sanctions on itself. for cooperation with terrorists ...

[rocket757]

Donald Trump’s administration suggests that it will be able to secure a deal with the Taliban-banned Afghan movement in Russia

Somehow they want to agree there and there. Ha, ha, let's see.

[Gene84]

Quote: rocket757

see

The United States will not do anything with the negotiations. The Taliban will not go to negotiations.

[rocket757]

Afghanistan, the cemetery of empires ...
In general, the Yankees of different transactions started a whole cart ... you can arrange a sweepstake, how many times they break off!

[rotmistr60]

Possible deal...

Surprisingly, the definition of a merchant in international relations has become firmly established in American use and is taken up by politicians in many countries. Trump spread his tail before the elections - here and the "deal" on the BV without asking the Palestinians, now decided to conclude a "deal" with the Taliban. But this time, he will not throw (deceive) those with whom he makes a deal, but he will be thrown and moreover decently.

[knn54]

The Taliban long for power and a truce with the Kabul government will not, do not recognize any coalitions.
Moreover, they are Pashtuns, and in power are representatives of the multinational Northern Alliance.
As the author correctly noted, IS is becoming more and more popular among young people. Al Qaeda is also not losing ground. The latter, however, recognize the supremacy of the Arabs over the rest, which affects the growth of their supporters, especially among the middle generation.

[Thrifty]

Is the United States so simple and they will give the Taliban their opium plantations? I do not believe! !!

[Rostislav]

Donald Trump is also in favor of reducing the number of troops in Afghanistan and, possibly, their subsequent complete withdrawal.

Fresh tradition ...
And who will protect the poppy?

[Romanenko]

This type of newly signed collective agreement and individual labor agreements?
They themselves created this gang, and now they are organizing a circus with the signing of documents.
They would call the director (the leader) and all decide amicably.

[Ros 56]

What do stripy bake start in Afghanistan? Whether it still will be, in my opinion the wars did not end there. But no, in my opinion in the first half of the last century it was somehow quiet.

[Kontuzia]

We know these deals, drug trafficking will be shared again .. From space, Afghanistan is covered in red spots of poppy plantations ..

[Astra55]

Preparing for the deal.
Will they move a drug together?