US refused to participate in military operation in Idlib

58

The US is not going to intervene in the situation in the Syrian province of Idlib and participate in a ground operation. This was stated by Assistant President of the United States for National Security Robert O'Brien.

According to a White House spokesman, Washington does not have a "magic wand" that would stop "violence in Syria." However, the United States is not going to send American troops to participate in hostilities in Idlib, since this conflict has nothing to do with them.



The US does not intend to "parachute" and say: Turkey, stop it. Russia, stop it. I do not think that we will carry out military intervention in Idlib in an attempt to rectify this bad situation. The proposal that America should do something (...) I do not see any real arguments in this

he said, adding that Washington condemns the situation in Idlib.

In addition, Trump's adviser noted that the United States is not a world gendarme and will not try to stop the parties to the conflict by force, since the position of the Trump administration is categorically different from the principle of “achieving peace from a position of strength” used by previous US presidents.

Earlier, the head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, announced the "soon coordinated" response of the US and Turkey to the shelling of Turkish positions by the Syrian government army.

I sent James Jeffrey (US Special Representative for Syria - approx. VO) to Ankara to coordinate retaliatory measures in response to this destabilizing attack. We support Turkey, our NATO ally

- said the US Secretary of State, adding that he calls on Russia and Syria to stop striking in the province of Idlib.
58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    12 February 2020 11: 04
    Because everyone will wet them there, even a truce can be announced laughing
    1. +5
      12 February 2020 11: 12
      the position of the Trump administration is completely different from the principle of "achieving peace from a position of strength" applied by previous US presidents

      In these pre-election times, many of the foreign policy statements of US officials and politicians include an intra-American agenda.
      1. +5
        12 February 2020 11: 43
        Trump does not mind his soldiers killing, but considers it necessary to revive when a situation arises, in the event of which a mass sending of coffins to the United States can begin.
        1. +2
          12 February 2020 13: 14
          They just do not want to fight with their wards. After all, the penguinostan feeds these barmalei and created them against Assad.
      2. +8
        12 February 2020 11: 51
        Quote: Thrall
        In these pre-election times during

        Assad and we must certainly take advantage of the current situation. So far, they have a moratorium on the "spread of democracy." If the information about non-interference of n-owls is true. They are such that they will change their minds 10 times more.
    2. +1
      12 February 2020 11: 12
      Quote: Cowbra
      Because everyone will wet them there, even a truce can be announced laughing

      White helmets will help them, they are famous saviorbully or rescuers, how is that right? feel
      1. +12
        12 February 2020 11: 17
        The Americans are not going to die for Turkish interests, and have presented the Turk with the right to die for themselves. lol
        1. +5
          12 February 2020 13: 36
          Quote: bessmertniy
          The Americans are not going to die for Turkish interests, and have presented the Turk with the right to die for themselves. lol

          Something like this. Those are still allies. After Iran's retaliatory missile strike on their mattress bases in Iraq, they have not yet finished. Until now, they cannot count the shell-shocked. From "no losses" to "109 injured" a month has passed, but the calculations are still going on. And then to get into the pie, where the Syrians, Turks, motley beards, the Russian Aerospace Forces, the IRGC forces of Iran, Hezbollah, and in some places the Kurds are fighting - this is not at all for mattresses. there is a risk of being shocked from all sides, and it will be problematic to get rid of contusions. They are masters of adding fuel to the fire, but they are not in the mood to receive luli.
          1. +2
            12 February 2020 14: 40
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            And then get into the pie, where the Syrians, Turks, motley bearded, the Russian Air Force, the forces of the IRGC of Iran, Hezbollah, sometimes Kurds are fighting - this is not for mattresses

            Mattresses still can not understand who there is who, who is fighting with whom and in what language they speak. And they don’t try to understand, for them everything is subhuman against the light elves.
      2. dSK
        -1
        12 February 2020 11: 30
        Turkey’s request for help on Idlib to NATO allies already exists.
        States will break at the beginning for the sake of appearance, especially since it is easier to do a ground operation with “someone else's hands” - fewer “zinc” packages. ”But coordination (intelligence, images from space) and aviation - yes.
        But it will cost Erdogan very expensive - Trump wants to show who NATO chief. bully
        At a minimum, they will demand the abandonment of the S-400 in exchange.
        1. 0
          12 February 2020 12: 10
          Quote from dsk
          At a minimum, they will demand the abandonment of the S-400 in exchange.

          At least they will break off - they need S-400 to protect the development of deposits in Cyprus - there Greece is VERY against. and they may well blow. How to knock them down? Patriots? Erdogan will soon leave Syria - better for money
        2. +2
          12 February 2020 13: 34
          Quote from dsk
          At a minimum, they will demand the abandonment of the S-400 in exchange.

          Back to return?
          Yeah, what has fallen from the cart, you won’t cut it with an ax
    3. +8
      12 February 2020 11: 15
      US refused to participate in military operation in Idlib

      Even if they wanted to "participate" - they have nothing to do. In the meantime, they will be tossing - Idlib will already be repainted from green to a different color))
      White House spokesman says Washington has no "magic wand"

      The "wand" of the States has been somewhat sluggish in recent years, more and more often fails its owner laughing laughing laughing
      1. +4
        12 February 2020 11: 31
        Quote: Fedor Egoist
        Even if they wanted to "participate" - they have nothing to do. In the meantime, they will be tossing - Idlib will already be repainted from green to a different color))

        They not only have nothing there, in Iraq they still consider shell-shocked laughing what kind of fighting is it when the trousers aren’t all washed drinks
        1. +1
          12 February 2020 11: 46
          The Americans in Syria, from the point of view of the Americans, have the most advantageous position: oil is swinging, the gesheft is growing. And the rest ... let them doggy with each other.
      2. +1
        12 February 2020 11: 35
        The "wand" of the States has been somewhat sluggish in recent years, more and more often fails its owner
        America performed some kind of "kidok". laughing
      3. +1
        12 February 2020 13: 36
        Quote: Fedor Egoist
        The "wand" of the States has been somewhat sluggish in recent years,

        Well, not all the same they have Wedges Blintons there laughing
    4. +2
      12 February 2020 11: 25
      Because everyone will wet them there, even a truce can be announced


      I assume that they have a different task, to give us, the Syrians and the Turks, a fight in the fight. There is a question for ours, let’s make it clear to Turkey that this is not their territory. And yes, it’s scary, our VKS, if anything, get very upset when they get in the way.
    5. +4
      12 February 2020 11: 53
      There is no oil tanker, but you can grab it, so the striped jackals are not interested there.
      1. dSK
        +1
        12 February 2020 12: 24
        Quote: Warrior with machine gun
        No oil woman

        Done right.
        It becomes very similar to variant "FRG - GDR."
        3/4 of Germany was under the control of NATO, 1/4 - the "Warsaw Pact".
      2. +2
        12 February 2020 14: 44
        Quote: Warrior with machine gun
        There is no oil tanker, but you can grab it, so the striped jackals are not interested there.

        All right. what is the point of them butting for a ruined impoverished province, with which, apart from a handful of olives, nothing has been taken. Either the Zaevfratye business is full of sands, and underneath is a sea of ​​oil.
  2. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 04
    to send American troops to participate in hostilities in Idlib the US is not going to
    Small revenge on Erdogan for all the "good" that has happened recently.
    1. +14
      12 February 2020 11: 10
      And I think the US does not interfere with the quarrel between Turkey and Russia ..
      1. +2
        12 February 2020 11: 15
        Quote: Svarog
        And I think the US does not interfere

        It goes without saying. It does not interfere.
        1. +6
          12 February 2020 11: 52
          Yes, and it does not hurt, and we must ... We can do without them.
  3. +2
    12 February 2020 11: 05
    Lying like a gray gelding, will intervene
  4. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 09
    such a delicious slap in the face from Trump came to the Sultan ... he will obviously not be able to compete with Putin alone ...
    1. +3
      12 February 2020 11: 26
      The biggest slap in the face is the line in the military budget on the allocation of 200 million for support and support for the Kurds in Syria. So Erdogan will be spoiled also under the door.
      1. 0
        12 February 2020 11: 39
        So Erdogan will be spoiled also under the door.
        They will give the command to "pocket" terrorists, blood will flow ...
  5. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 10
    The US is not going to intervene in the situation in the Syrian province of Idlib and participate in a ground operation. This was stated by Assistant President of the United States for National Security Robert O'Brien.

    But this is right, logical, justified!
    1. +3
      12 February 2020 11: 41
      I’m afraid that these are just words, no, they won’t participate in the ground operation, but they can very well enjoy tamahawks.
      1. +2
        12 February 2020 11: 48
        They can, but this is again a waste of time ... unless the deadline for the disposal of the next "axes" has come! In addition, then it will be necessary to make new missiles ... the taxpayer will pay or simply, they will print the green ones, and they will be sucked into the next sucker, for such specific resources.
        1. +3
          12 February 2020 11: 57
          The best way to recycle, though there is a problem, not everyone gets there, but they need to cheat on this.
          1. +2
            12 February 2020 12: 06
            Whoever falls on their heads ... it's not their problem anymore. there was no need to block the road "hatchet"!
            1. +3
              12 February 2020 12: 28
              There are shameful facts that characterize them not from the best side ...
              1. +2
                12 February 2020 12: 53
                So with them like water off a goose! Besides ... guano, what else can stick?
  6. +1
    12 February 2020 11: 13
    US refused to participate in military operation in Idlib

    Well, you, you threw, you, you threw, you, you threw.
  7. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 14
    As I assumed yesterday, Erdogan fled to NATO empty-handedly (figuratively) asking for help from the Syrian army and Russia. The salvation of drowning people is the work of the drowning people themselves. But it was fun
    Advisor to Trump noted that the US is not a world gendarme
    It's funny, not being a world gendarme sticking their nose with military support to all corners of the world trying to pump their rights.
  8. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 15
    "The head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, announced a" soon coordinated "response by the United States and Turkey to the shelling of Turkish positions by the Syrian government army."
    1. The head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, argues that if the IDGIB is located in the German state of Georgia (- the state in the southeastern United States) or in Turkey near Malatya ..
    2. When did the UN authorize the presence of Turkish troops. Yes and US troops in Turkey ?? is it interpreted as aggression against a sovereign state?
  9. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 16
    There is no oil.
  10. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 23
    I remembered the fairly forgotten classic "Everything was mixed up in the Oblonskys' house!" One representative says the US will not intervene. Earlier, "Mike Pompeo announced an" early coordinated "response from the United States and Turkey." A legitimate question arises. What is Pompeo? And most importantly, if Pompeo and the representative start to fight who will beat whom. In the meantime, Assad is slowly recovering his territory one by one, and feeling the mighty hand of his friend "put on Erdogan." Well done - that's right. and then again our enlightened "experts" on talk shows will begin to argue whether Erdogan will get off with only tomatoes or not?
  11. +3
    12 February 2020 11: 25
    Quote: rotmistr60
    As I assumed yesterday, Erdogan fled to NATO empty-handedly (figuratively) asking for help from the Syrian army and Russia. The salvation of drowning people is the work of the drowning people themselves. But it was fun

    The fact is that Turkey was not subjected to aggression by any side, which means that the clause on mutual assistance cannot be activated.
    1. +2
      12 February 2020 11: 46
      Aron Zaavi .... The fact is that Turkey was not subjected to aggression by any side, which means that the clause on mutual assistance cannot be involved.

      You forgot about the "Coalition" (of 63 countries on paper) created by the US to justify its invasion of Syria. Turkey is on this list. The United States has not eliminated this list, and at any time can wave it again in front of the UN Security Council members.
  12. 0
    12 February 2020 11: 26
    and attacks not on Idlib province are delivered on barmaley. And the crisis is caused by the actions of the United States, which is now waving a white handkerchief.
  13. -1
    12 February 2020 11: 29
    USA does not intend to "parachute"

    Earlier, the head of the US Department of State Mike Pompeo announced a "quick coordinated" US response

    Well, Tomogawks will shoot back and calm down
  14. +2
    12 February 2020 11: 39
    I do not think that we will carry out military intervention in Idlib in an attempt to rectify this bad situation.


    As "allies" ... you all have to get out of Syria ...
  15. 0
    12 February 2020 11: 39
    This is already progress.
  16. +1
    12 February 2020 11: 58
    This is something new .... The US will probably assume that the next after the Turks and their bandits will be those who are asked to free the territory of a foreign country and stop robbing it ..... I think that everything will be completely different from what they are now declaring. ....
  17. -3
    12 February 2020 12: 05
    The United States does not intend to "parachute" and say: Turkey, stop this. Russia, stop it. I don't think we will carry out military intervention in Idlib in an attempt to rectify this bad situation.

    Here it is just a situation "to get more popcorn, and to be more comfortable in the auditorium". With any ending of the "plot", this "spectator" is not at a loss.
    Obviously simple.
  18. 0
    12 February 2020 12: 07
    So striped fools only pretend to fuck the profits. And they cannot lay their heads for Eric the Ottoman.
  19. 0
    12 February 2020 12: 23
    "The United States is not going to intervene in the situation in the Syrian province of Idlib and participate in the ground operation. This was stated by Assistant to the US President for National Security Robert O'Brien." Of course, there are not enough oil wells to intervene.
  20. +1
    12 February 2020 12: 25
    Heh, here are the "allies"))
    Just that, right into the bushes.
    Our VKS hit Idlib, the Yankees do not want to fall under a hot hand.
  21. +1
    12 February 2020 12: 33
    Well, the Turks didn’t miss a finger in ... a sting to insert! Turks are obliged to respond to vile Americans. Yes, let the refugees lemon a little more into Europe - let them rejoice there too.
  22. 0
    12 February 2020 12: 33
    because it will not be a small victorious war, but a meat grinder of regular armies. nobody needs this before the us election. even hawks will probably think three times that patriotic speeches with zinc will not fit in
  23. +1
    12 February 2020 13: 08
    As I already wrote, no one will allow the king to create any Ottoman empire, including the FSA.
  24. 0
    12 February 2020 14: 27
    But for me, everything is clear. The shtatovtsy would like to throw the Turks and entice them into the war, they would begin to "concentrate" ... They would leak, who is loaded where and how much on the ships .... Well, further according to the plan. Then Turkey would become more insolent to the point of impossibility. And at the last moment it would become a teaching, but it would be too late.
    And now the US is actually stopping Turkey. The older brother went for a beer ...
  25. 0
    12 February 2020 14: 45
    Well, Erdogan, it seems, has already completely set off his mind.
    Yes, the US is sleeping and seeing how Turkey is fighting with Syria, and even better with Russia, and they will be happy to look at it from the outside.
    And this miracle suggests that the geldings in Idltbe should cling to Russia, and Turkey would observe from the side. laughing
    But it’s nothing that the Americans themselves brought to power Erdogan and precisely so that he would get involved in all regional conflicts, thinking at the same time that he was reviving the Ottoman Empire, but in fact destroying Turkey.
  26. 0
    15 February 2020 21: 58
    That's right, why should Americans get into someone else's showdown in Syria