US refused to participate in military operation in Idlib


The US is not going to intervene in the situation in the Syrian province of Idlib and participate in a ground operation. This was stated by Assistant President of the United States for National Security Robert O'Brien.


According to a White House spokesman, Washington does not have a "magic wand" that would stop "violence in Syria." However, the United States is not going to send American troops to participate in hostilities in Idlib, since this conflict has nothing to do with them.

The US does not intend to "parachute" and say: Turkey, stop it. Russia, stop it. I do not think that we will carry out military intervention in Idlib in an attempt to rectify this bad situation. The proposal that America should do something (...) I do not see any real arguments in this

he said, adding that Washington condemns the situation in Idlib.

In addition, Trump's adviser noted that the United States is not a world gendarme and will not try to stop the parties to the conflict by force, since the position of the Trump administration is categorically different from the principle of “achieving peace from a position of strength” used by previous US presidents.

Earlier, the head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, announced the "soon coordinated" response of the US and Turkey to the shelling of Turkish positions by the Syrian government army.

I sent James Jeffrey (US Special Representative for Syria - approx. VO) to Ankara to coordinate retaliatory measures in response to this destabilizing attack. We support Turkey, our NATO ally

- said the US Secretary of State, adding that he calls on Russia and Syria to stop striking in the province of Idlib.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Cowbra 12 February 2020 11: 04 New
    • 17
    • 6
    +11
    Because everyone will wet them there, even a truce can be announced laughing
    1. Thrall 12 February 2020 11: 12 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      President Trump’s administration’s position is categorically different from the principle of “achieving peace from a position of strength” as applied by previous US presidents

      In these pre-election times, many of the foreign policy statements of US officials and politicians include an intra-American agenda.
      1. Chaldon48 12 February 2020 11: 43 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Trump does not mind his soldiers killing, but considers it necessary to revive when a situation arises, in the event of which a mass sending of coffins to the United States can begin.
        1. Range 12 February 2020 13: 14 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          They just do not want to fight with their wards. After all, the penguinostan feeds these barmalei and created them against Assad.
      2. Polite Moose 12 February 2020 11: 51 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: Thrall
        In these pre-election times during

        Assad and we must certainly take advantage of the current situation. So far, they have a moratorium on "the spread of democracy." If the information about the non-intervention of p-owls is true. They are such that they change their mind 10 more times.
    2. Hto tama 12 February 2020 11: 12 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Cowbra
      Because everyone will wet them there, even a truce can be announced laughing

      White helmets will help them, they are famous saviorbully or rescuers, how is that right? repeat
      1. bessmertniy 12 February 2020 11: 17 New
        • 12
        • 0
        +12
        The Americans are not going to die for Turkish interests, and have presented the Turk with the right to die for themselves. lol
        1. Nyrobsky 12 February 2020 13: 36 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: bessmertniy
          The Americans are not going to die for Turkish interests, and have presented the Turk with the right to die for themselves. lol

          Something like this. Those are allies. After a retaliatory missile strike by Iran on their mattress bases in Iraq, they have not yet come to their senses. Until now, they cannot count the shell-shocked. From "no losses" to "109 injured" a month has passed, and calculations are still underway. And then get into the pie, where the Syrians, Turks, motley bearded, Russian air forces, the forces of the IRGC of Iran, Hezbollah, sometimes Kurds are fighting - this is not at all for mattresses. there is a risk of raking from all sides, and getting rid of shell shocks will be problematic. They are masters to add fuel to the fire, but to get cages, they are not tuned.
          1. Grits 12 February 2020 14: 40 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            And then get into the pie, where the Syrians, Turks, motley bearded, the Russian Air Force, the forces of the IRGC of Iran, Hezbollah, sometimes Kurds are fighting - this is not for mattresses

            Mattresses still can not understand who there is who, who is fighting with whom and in what language they speak. And they don’t try to understand, for them everything is subhuman against the light elves.
      2. dSK
        dSK 12 February 2020 11: 30 New
        • 2
        • 3
        -1
        Turkey’s request for help on Idlib to NATO allies already exists.
        States will break down at the beginning for the sake of view, especially since a ground operation is easier to do with “someone else’s pens” - fewer “zinc“ packages. ”But coordination (intelligence, satellite images) and aviation, yes.
        But it will cost Erdogan very expensive - Trump wants to show who NATO chief. bully
        At a minimum, they will demand the abandonment of the S-400 in exchange.
        1. Cowbra 12 February 2020 12: 10 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: dsk
          At a minimum, they will demand the abandonment of the S-400 in exchange.

          At least they will break off - they need S-400 to protect the development of deposits in Cyprus - there Greece is VERY against. and they may well blow. How to knock them down? Patriots? Erdogan will soon leave Syria - better for money
        2. Lipchanin 12 February 2020 13: 34 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: dsk
          At a minimum, they will demand the abandonment of the S-400 in exchange.

          Back to return?
          Yeah, what has fallen from the cart, you won’t cut it with an ax
    3. Fedor egoist 12 February 2020 11: 15 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      US refused to participate in military operation in Idlib

      Even if they wanted to "participate" - they stupidly nothing. In the meantime, they will transfer - Idlib will already be repainted from green to another color))
      According to the White House spokesman, Washington does not have a “magic wand”

      The "wand" of the United States is something sluggish in recent years, increasingly fails its owner laughing laughing laughing
      1. Hto tama 12 February 2020 11: 31 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Fedor Egoist
        Even if they wanted to "participate" - they stupidly nothing. In the meantime, they will transfer - Idlib will already be repainted from green to another color))

        They not only have nothing there, in Iraq they still consider shell-shocked laughing what kind of fighting is it when the trousers aren’t all washed drinks
        1. Skay 12 February 2020 11: 46 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          The Americans in Syria, from the point of view of the Americans, have the most advantageous position: oil is swinging, the gesheft is growing. And the rest ... let them doggy with each other.
      2. Kamchatsky 12 February 2020 11: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        The "wand" of the United States is something sluggish in recent years, increasingly fails its owner
        Some in a row "kidka" America performed. laughing
      3. Lipchanin 12 February 2020 13: 36 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Fedor Egoist
        The "wand" of the States is something sluggish in recent years,

        Well, not all the same they have Wedges Blintons there laughing
    4. letinant 12 February 2020 11: 25 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Because everyone will wet them there, even a truce can be announced


      I assume that they have a different task, to give us, the Syrians and the Turks, a fight in the fight. There is a question for ours, let’s make it clear to Turkey that this is not their territory. And yes, it’s scary, our VKS, if anything, get very upset when they get in the way.
    5. Warrior with machine gun 12 February 2020 11: 53 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      There is no oil tanker, but you can grab it, so the striped jackals are not interested there.
      1. dSK
        dSK 12 February 2020 12: 24 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Warrior with a machine gun
        No oil woman

        Done right.
        It becomes very similar to option "Germany - GDR."
        3/4 of Germany was under NATO control; 1/4 was the Warsaw Pact.
      2. Grits 12 February 2020 14: 44 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Warrior with a machine gun
        There is no oil tanker, but you can grab it, so the striped jackals are not interested there.

        All right. what is the point of them butting for a ruined impoverished province, with which, apart from a handful of olives, nothing has been taken. Either the Zaevfratye business is full of sands, and underneath is a sea of ​​oil.
  2. Loess 12 February 2020 11: 04 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    to send American troops to participate in hostilities in Idlib the US is not going to
    Petty revenge on Erdogan for all the “good” things that have happened lately.
    1. Svarog 12 February 2020 11: 10 New
      • 18
      • 4
      +14
      And I think the US does not interfere with the quarrel between Turkey and Russia ..
      1. Loess 12 February 2020 11: 15 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Svarog
        And I think the US does not interfere

        It goes without saying. It does not interfere.
        1. DMB 75 12 February 2020 11: 52 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Yes, and it does not hurt, and we must ... We can do without them.
  3. SanSanych Gusev 12 February 2020 11: 05 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Lying like a gray gelding, will intervene
  4. kepmor 12 February 2020 11: 09 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    such a delicious slap in the face from Trump came to the Sultan ... he will obviously not be able to compete with Putin alone ...
    1. K-612-O 12 February 2020 11: 26 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      The biggest slap in the face is the line in the military budget on the allocation of 200 million for support and support for the Kurds in Syria. So Erdogan will be spoiled also under the door.
      1. Kamchatsky 12 February 2020 11: 39 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        So Erdogan will be spoiled also under the door.
        They will give a command to the "pocket" terrorugs, the blood will pour ...
  5. rocket757 12 February 2020 11: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The US is not going to intervene in the situation in the Syrian province of Idlib and participate in a ground operation. This was stated by Assistant President of the United States for National Security Robert O'Brien.

    But this is right, logical, justified!
    1. cniza 12 February 2020 11: 41 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      I’m afraid that these are just words, no, they won’t participate in the ground operation, but they can very well enjoy tamahawks.
      1. rocket757 12 February 2020 11: 48 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        They can, but it’s again a waste of money ... unless the term for recycling the next “axes” has come! Besides, then it will be necessary to make new missiles ... the taxpayer will pay or simply, the green ones will print and they suck in the next sucker for specific such resources.
        1. cniza 12 February 2020 11: 57 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          The best way to recycle, though there is a problem, not everyone gets there, but they need to cheat on this.
          1. rocket757 12 February 2020 12: 06 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Who will fall on their heads ... so this is not their problem. there was no need to block the road "hatchet"!
            1. cniza 12 February 2020 12: 28 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              There are shameful facts that characterize them not from the best side ...
              1. rocket757 12 February 2020 12: 53 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                So with them like water off a goose! Besides ... guano, what else can stick?
  6. Sky strike fighter 12 February 2020 11: 13 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    US refused to participate in military operation in Idlib

    Well, you, you threw, you, you threw, you, you threw.
  7. rotmistr60 12 February 2020 11: 14 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    As I assumed yesterday, Erdogan fled to NATO empty-handedly (figuratively) asking for help from the Syrian army and Russia. The salvation of drowning people is the work of the drowning people themselves. But it was fun
    Advisor to Trump noted that the US is not a world gendarme
    It's funny, not being a world gendarme sticking their nose with military support to all corners of the world trying to pump their rights.
  8. To be or not to be 12 February 2020 11: 15 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "The head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, announced the" soon coordinated "response of the US and Turkey to the shelling of Turkish positions by the Syrian government army."
    1. The head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, argues that if the IDGIB is located in the German state of Georgia (- the state in the southeastern United States) or in Turkey near Malatya ..
    2. When did the UN authorize the presence of Turkish troops. Yes and US troops in Turkey ?? is it interpreted as aggression against a sovereign state?
  9. knn54 12 February 2020 11: 16 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    There is no oil.
  10. mikh-korsakov 12 February 2020 11: 23 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I remembered a pretty forgotten classic "Everything mixed up in the house of Oblonsky!" One representative said the US would not intervene. And earlier, "Mike Pompeo announced a" coordinated soon "response from the US and Turkey." A legitimate question arises. What is Pompeo? And most importantly, if Pompeo and the representative begin to fight someone who will get over it. Meanwhile, Assad was slowly returning his territory one by one, and feeling his friend’s powerful hand "put on Erdogan ...". Well done - that's right. and then again our enlightened "experts" on the talk show will start to argue whether Erdogan will get off with just tomatoes or not?
  11. Aaron Zawi 12 February 2020 11: 25 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    Quote: rotmistr60
    As I assumed yesterday, Erdogan fled to NATO empty-handedly (figuratively) asking for help from the Syrian army and Russia. The salvation of drowning people is the work of the drowning people themselves. But it was fun

    The fact is that Turkey was not subjected to aggression by any side, which means that the clause on mutual assistance cannot be activated.
    1. askort154 12 February 2020 11: 46 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Aron Zawi .... The fact is that Turkey was not subjected to aggression by any side, which means that the clause on mutual assistance cannot be involved.

      You forgot about the “Coalition” (from 63 countries on paper) created by the USA to justify its invasion of Syria. Turkey is on this list. The United States has not eliminated this list, and at any time they can once again wave it to members of the UN Security Council.
  12. Lamata 12 February 2020 11: 26 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    and attacks not on Idlib province are delivered on barmaley. And the crisis is caused by the actions of the United States, which is now waving a white handkerchief.
  13. Chigi 12 February 2020 11: 29 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    US does not intend to "parachute"

    Earlier, the head of the US State Department, Mike Pompeo, announced a "coordinated soon" US response

    Well, Tomogawks will shoot back and calm down
  14. cniza 12 February 2020 11: 39 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I do not think that we will carry out military intervention in Idlib in an attempt to rectify this bad situation.


    In the "allies" ... all of you will have to get out of Syria ...
  15. Zaurbek 12 February 2020 11: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This is already progress.
  16. Chingachguk 12 February 2020 11: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    This is something new .... The US will probably assume that the next after the Turks and their bandits will be those who are asked to free the territory of a foreign country and stop robbing it ..... I think that everything will be completely different from what they are now declaring. ....
  17. Maestro Alexander 12 February 2020 12: 05 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    The US does not intend to "parachute" and say: Turkey, stop it. Russia, stop it. I do not think that we will carry out military intervention in Idlib in an attempt to rectify this bad situation.

    Here, it’s just a situation of “gaining more popcorn and placing yourself more conveniently in the auditorium”. With any finale of the "plot", this "viewer" is not at a loss.
    Obviously simple.
  18. Ros 56 12 February 2020 12: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    So striped fools only pretend to fuck the profits. And they cannot lay their heads for Eric the Ottoman.
  19. Strashila 12 February 2020 12: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "The US is not going to intervene in the situation in the Syrian province of Idlib and participate in a ground operation. This was stated by Assistant to the President of the United States for National Security Robert O'Brien." Of course, and what to intervene, there are not enough oil wells for this.
  20. Lord of the Sith 12 February 2020 12: 25 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Heh, here's the "allies"))
    Just that, right into the bushes.
    Our VKS hit Idlib, the Yankees do not want to fall under a hot hand.
  21. faterdom 12 February 2020 12: 33 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, the Turks didn’t miss a finger in ... a sting to insert! Turks are obliged to respond to vile Americans. Yes, let the refugees lemon a little more into Europe - let them rejoice there too.
  22. Last centurion 12 February 2020 12: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    because it will not be a small victorious war, but a meat grinder of regular armies. nobody needs this before the us election. even hawks will probably think three times that patriotic speeches with zinc will not fit in
  23. Incvizitor 12 February 2020 13: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    As I already wrote, no one will allow the king to create any Ottoman empire, including the FSA.
  24. Kerensky 12 February 2020 14: 27 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And for me, everything is clear. If the Shtatovs wanted to throw the Turks and drag them into the war, they would begin to "concentrate" ... They would leak, where and how many are loaded onto the ships .... Well, then according to plan. Then Turkey would become impudent to impossibility. And at the last moment it would become a doctrine, but it would be too late.
    And now the US is actually stopping Turkey. The older brother went for a beer ...
  25. flicker 12 February 2020 14: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, Erdogan, it seems, has already completely set off his mind.
    Yes, the US is sleeping and seeing how Turkey is fighting with Syria, and even better with Russia, and they will be happy to look at it from the outside.
    And this miracle suggests that the geldings in Idltbe should cling to Russia, and Turkey would observe from the side. laughing
    But it’s nothing that the Americans themselves brought to power Erdogan and precisely so that he would get involved in all regional conflicts, thinking at the same time that he was reviving the Ottoman Empire, but in fact destroying Turkey.
  26. Xomaik 15 February 2020 21: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    That's right, why should Americans get into someone else's showdown in Syria