Recent developments in Syria: Hmeimim base attacked from Idlib


The Russian military base Khmeimim in Syria has again become the target of attacks by militants. In February 2020 alone, two unmanned aerial vehicle attacks were repelled.


Major General Yuri Borenkov, the head of the Center for the Reconciliation of the warring parties in Syria, said that on the evening of February 9, two attacks were repelled by means of air defense of the Khmeimim air base. The first was accomplished with the help of a drone that flew in from the north-east direction and was shot down 2 km from the base by the Pantsir missile system. The second drone flew from the north-west direction and was destroyed 6 km from the base. No one was hurt as a result of the attacks.

Prior to this, on February 3, 2020, there was already an attempt to attack a Russian military base with the participation of an unmanned aerial vehicle of unknown origin. The drone flew to the base from the side of the Mediterranean Sea and was also shot down by air defense systems. Similar provocations against the Russian military base took place in January as well, to no avail, since the air defense forces covering Khmeimim work perfectly.

Over the past two years, more than 100 unmanned aerial vehicles have been destroyed, with which terrorists tried to attack a Russian military facility. Nevertheless, despite the obvious effectiveness of air defense systems, Syrian militants do not leave any hope of causing at least some damage to the Khmeimim base. Therefore, attacks continue regularly.

Interestingly, at present, attacks on the Khmeimim base are being carried out from the territory of Idlib - the very one that Turkey insistently demands from the Syrian government troops and Russia to stop strikes. In 2018 in Sochi, the presidents of Russia and Turkey, Vladimir Putin and Recep Erdogan, agreed to create a demilitarized zone in Idlib. Now drones are launched from this demilitarized zone to attack the Russian military base. And this is not surprising: the demilitarization of Idlib in the understanding of Erdogan implied the absence of Syrian troops in the province and city, but by no means the withdrawal of opposition formations from the territory of Idlib.

Today, Idlib remains the main stronghold of militants in the north of the country and the fact of the presence of armed terrorist groups in the city and its environs is a very big threat to the security of not only the Syrian troops, but also the Russian military base.

It is clear that the presence of the Russian military in Syria is the strongest annoying factor for opponents of President Bashar Assad. If Russia had not at one time intervened in the Syrian civil war, with a very high probability Damascus would have been taken by the militants long ago, and Assad could well comprehend the sad fate of Muammar Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein.

Having corrected the situation, Russia became the "number one enemy" for the Syrian militants. Since the existence of Russian military bases in Tartus and Hmeimim is not beneficial for other military and political actors in the region — the United States, NATO, and Turkey — it’s clear that American or Turkish representatives will not respond to attacks by militants, but they will constantly focus on Russian and Syrian attacks on Idlib.

By the way, at the same time, when the Russian military base was attacked by Idlib, the Turkish armed forces introduced into the territory of this province were attacking the positions of the Syrian government forces. On February 10, Ankara reported attacks on 101 Syrian targets, reporting that 3 Syrian were hit tank and 1 helicopter was shot down. Judging by the photos published on the network, the helicopter was not shot down, but damaged. Turkish President Recep Erdogan announced the destruction of 76 Syrian soldiers and officers.

The Turkish leadership claims that the attacks on the Syrian troops are exclusively retaliatory in nature: allegedly as a result of the offensive of the Syrian Arab army, Turkish troops are dying. But it is clear that in reality Turkey came to the aid of the militants she supported, who settled in Idlib. Indeed, the amazing successes of the Syrian government forces in recent weeks have left the Turks in no doubt: if you do not intervene in the situation, then Idlib will soon be taken by Assad’s supporters.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tihonmarine 11 February 2020 10: 12 New
    • 29
    • 1
    +28
    Interestingly, at present, attacks on the Khmeimim base are being carried out from the territory of Idlib - the very one that Turkey insistently demands from the Syrian government troops and Russia to stop strikes.
    Hollow, hollow and hollow again until there is not a single action movie left. (see the history of the Second World War).
    1. Gregory2 11 February 2020 10: 21 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      The first was accomplished with the help of a drone that flew in from the north-east direction and was shot down 2 km from the base by the Pantsir missile system. The second drone flew from the north-west direction and was destroyed 6 km from the base.

      “Shell-C2” with “Verba” are well destroyed by drones - the enemy will not fly.
      1. PSih2097 11 February 2020 15: 52 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Quote: Gregory2
        “Shell-C2” with “Verba” are well destroyed by drones - the enemy will not fly.

        only shell and pussy-willow missiles cost several times more, but orders of magnitude more than Chinese-built UAVs for $ 100-300 ... they need to be soaked from the main gun.
        1. Alex Nevs 11 February 2020 17: 59 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          What about the likely damage to these drones?
          1. PSih2097 11 February 2020 18: 01 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            that's why ZRPK and they rule, Shilka, Tunguska, Shell ... Because the shell is cheaper. Yes, even ZU-23-2 with current technologies can be made autonomous - only have time to recharge, although there are options ...
        2. smart ass 11 February 2020 22: 02 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          One gets the impression of the low efficiency of the cannons on the shell
          1. PSih2097 11 February 2020 22: 46 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            on the shell, as well as on the tunguska ALL O.K. it’s just considered that it’s easier to run a couple of pencils on one target than to be responsible for the inability to use art ...
            Just for information, I’ve been to the Kamchatka Peninsula Military University, a couple of people are sitting on “Kamchatka” - there is a lecture on the “tower”, and they are playing a “bald”, my question is why we are not writing an abstract - the answer: “We are future officers, our business is to press buttons and launch rockets. "
    2. figwam 11 February 2020 10: 22 New
      • 9
      • 1
      +8
      Be sure to squeeze this corner and gain a foothold on the border.
      1. Vvol 11 February 2020 18: 44 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: figvam
        Be sure to squeeze this corner and gain a foothold on the border.

        Idlib, maybe they will squeeze ... Yes, only Erdogan didn’t start the intervention in Syria for that, on the Turkish-Syrian border "fixed" anyone else BESIDES Turks ... It's one thing that happens further south, deep into Syria - another thing lose as much as the border itself. It will be a disaster for Erdogan - so the Turks will cling their teeth here ...
        1. aliev58 12 February 2020 19: 35 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Duck it is necessary to knock out these teeth with the jaw Turk!
    3. russia2016 11 February 2020 10: 36 New
      • 3
      • 9
      -6
      So the main fighters there are Turks and training bases, depots, ammunition, weapons are all from Turkey, well, now do you order us to bomb Turkey? These are our friends, not order!
      1. bessmertniy 11 February 2020 11: 00 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Turks, most likely, direct these drones to Khmeimim. negative Or at least they observe from their observation posts, as the militants do.
      2. PSih2097 11 February 2020 15: 56 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: russia2016
        So the main fighters there are Turks and training bases, depots, ammunition, weapons are all from Turkey, so what do we order to bomb Turkey now?

        there are not only Turks, there is a viper in Chechnya between the first and second wars (both NATO soldiers and mercenaries, and Arabs with blacks) ...
      3. aliev58 12 February 2020 19: 48 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Jews have long leveled all warehouses and weapons bases near their borders. So that all talk of friendship with the Turks is verbiage. They were the enemy, they will remain enemies. And the enemy must be destroyed as soon as you see him.
    4. A.K. 11 February 2020 11: 41 New
      • 9
      • 0
      +9
      I completely agree with you. But I want to add that you need to answer in their own way to stick drones out of plywood and let them go where it should, no one has any means of protection like our shells, but it will be a little more serious to repulse the attacks, and let's see how these well-wishers (partners) will behave feel after the current answer.
    5. smart ass 12 February 2020 17: 01 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The only solution for Russia is to cover the sky over Syria.
  2. Strashila 11 February 2020 10: 25 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Terrorists began to be actively involved in testing various tactical options against Russian weapons.
    1. russia2016 11 February 2020 10: 39 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      The main accomplices and advisers to terrorists there are Turks, so draw conclusions
      1. max702 11 February 2020 18: 36 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        Quote: russia2016
        The main accomplices and advisers to terrorists there are Turks, so draw conclusions

        The main Israel and the USA there are the rest so part-time ..
        1. Oquzyurd 11 February 2020 19: 52 New
          • 3
          • 3
          0
          Finances go to these militants from Kuwait. This is a long-known fact. Here and draw conclusions who their uncle is standing behind Kuwait.
          1. max702 11 February 2020 20: 12 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Ideologist and developer Israel, USA material support, oil monarchies finances, local destroyed countries (Iraq, Libya, Syria, Kurds, etc.) cannon fodder ..

        2. russia2016 12 February 2020 09: 29 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Maybe other countries take part there, but at the moment the Turks are conducting the annexation of lands in Syria, for Erdogan the main strategy is Pan-Turkism and the creation of a new formation of the Ottoman Empire. The participation of the United States and Israel in the conflict in Syria fades against the background of the total war that Turkey is waging! Russia will soon reap the fruits of “friendship” with Turkey, but it’s not the thing to get used to it
          1. Sergej1972 13 February 2020 09: 26 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Pan-Turkism and the creation of a new formation of the Ottoman Empire are incompatible things.
            1. Alex russia 13 February 2020 16: 21 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              For Erdogan, there are no incompatible things, this is still a scoundrel
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. aliev58 12 February 2020 19: 53 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          I completely agree, there the Jewish Mossad and the CIA rule the ball.
        5. Lipchanin 12 February 2020 21: 47 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: max702
          the rest are so part-time ..

          Simply put, running errands
    2. nov_tech.vrn 11 February 2020 12: 35 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      and what you wanted, who pays the girl, she dances.
  3. Cowbra 11 February 2020 10: 31 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Interestingly, at present, attacks on the Khmeimim base are being carried out from the territory of Idlib - the very one that Turkey insistently demands from the Syrian government troops and Russia to stop strikes.

    Therefore, it requires
  4. Lipchanin 11 February 2020 10: 35 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    allegedly as a result of the offensive of the Syrian Arab army die turkish military personnel.

    What are they doing there?
    Someone called them there?
    1. aliev58 12 February 2020 19: 56 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It is time to drive them into boilers like rams and prepare barbed wire and towers.
      1. Lipchanin 12 February 2020 19: 58 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: aliev58
        It is time to drive them into boilers like rams and prepare barbed wire and towers.

        What more. Feed them yet. Drive to Turkey. Let it be Erdogashkin's headache
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. rocket757 11 February 2020 10: 44 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Similar provocations against the Russian military base took place in January too, also to no avail, since the air defense forces covering Khmeimim work perfectly.

    It’s better not to come up with an advertisement .. especially after the minke whales are completely taxed, with their own air defense.
  7. Paul Siebert 11 February 2020 10: 58 New
    • 15
    • 2
    +13
    Apparently this summer we have to eat Uzbek tomatoes.
    Erdogan will not forgive us an alliance with Assad.
    Well, nothing - nobody canceled the tomatoes from their native greenhouse.
    Although they are not plastic, like the Turks ... wink
    1. andj61 11 February 2020 11: 11 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      In any case, Erdogan will try to send Turkish tomatoes to us - the Kurds, Syria is transitory, and Ankara’s economic interests come first. bully
    2. Siberian 66 11 February 2020 11: 58 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Just not to dig yourself new straits instead of the Bosporus Dardanelles ..
      1. Artavazdych 11 February 2020 23: 42 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Why not dig? How to dig! For 100 years, as with Iran, we have been chopping this topic across the Caspian Sea to the Persian Gulf. I heard that some work is already underway
        1. LeftPers 12 February 2020 06: 48 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Persian Gulf and the Mediterranean Sea, slightly different geographical points, not?
          1. Artavazdych 12 February 2020 12: 53 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Yeah. But the first is much more significant.
  8. Ural resident 11 February 2020 11: 07 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Something does not say anything about yesterday's attack by the Turks on Assad’s army. It seems that ours got there too. So far, only on hostile infa sites, Our Ministry of Defense is silent as always, thereby fertilizing the ground for speculation, and after a week will say that yes, this happened, and again unexpectedly.
  9. Livonetc 11 February 2020 11: 18 New
    • 8
    • 1
    +7
    Quote: Head of Faculty
    Send SMS to number 8080 indicating the numbers which side do you support in this conflict in Syria.
    The cost of SMS is 75 rubles without VAT.
    1. Russia
    2. Turkey
    3. USA
    4. Kurds
    5. Israel
    6. Syrian government forces
    7. Syrian Free Armies
    8. Iran
    9. Jihad Anustra
    10 . Isil Al Islam.
    11. Fucking babai.
    12. Edren loaf.
    13. Edrid Madrid

    Cheap troll.
    1. Stas157 11 February 2020 12: 45 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Quote: Livonetc
      Cheap troll.

      This is no longer a troll. This is a scammer. Such immediately in an eternal ban is necessary.
      1. PSih2097 11 February 2020 16: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Stas157
        Such immediately in an eternal ban is necessary.

        to the MAC address, although it will not help, now there are so many progs to change it there ...
  10. Vladimir Mashkov 11 February 2020 11: 50 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    It's time to close this Idlib adder !!! am
  11. Kapellan23 11 February 2020 11: 52 New
    • 9
    • 3
    +6
    It's time to take Constantinople?

    ---
    Attention! You do not have permission to view hidden text.


    1. Yuri 11 February 2020 17: 45 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Great lines. Looks like our ancestors of the Turks knew better than current generations, did not look for reasons to take into account their "interests", they did not build friends and peacekeepers from.
      Although it was necessary not to sneeze at them, but still take Constantinople. If not to Alexander |, whom the entire ruling elite urged only to give a command, then to Alexander || the British were not afraid, or Nikolai ||, when the Balkan peoples needed very little help from Russia. And the whole story would go differently
  12. Ros 56 11 February 2020 12: 38 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And who specifically attacks and why are they still alive? It may be enough to play tolerance. Yesterday Botyan celebrated the 103rd anniversary of his birth, a low bow to him and the health of the immortal. Where are his followers and students?
  13. Zaurbek 11 February 2020 13: 18 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    And on the other hand, if UAVs are launched through our base ...., then launch sites can be legitimately (for Turks) bombed by VKS.
  14. Vitaly Smirnov_2 11 February 2020 13: 38 New
    • 2
    • 13
    -11
    Troops in foreign territory can only be temporarily. Our time in Syria seems to be running out. Now we need to figure out how to leave beautifully. They could not come up with the Foreign Ministry and the FSB, the withdrawals announced by Putin failed. Can the question be brought up for a nationwide discussion?
  15. bsk_una 11 February 2020 14: 46 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    From where the drones arrived, missiles with a good warhead should be fired there, so that there would be no one to miss and no one else to launch. This is a real and worthwhile answer!
    1. dauria 11 February 2020 22: 01 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      From where the drones arrived, missiles with a good warhead should be fired there, so that there would be no one to miss and no one else to launch.


      So the Jews do just that. laughing But for some reason this is not welcomed in VO. recourse
    2. russia2016 12 February 2020 10: 09 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      The answer is simple - these drones are launched by the Turks, and Vova has no reason to conflict with the Turks there, the full-scale conflict in Syria with Turkey will lead to the complete failure of our company there and our bases there will destroy and Assad will end
  16. Oleg Salov 11 February 2020 14: 50 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    The Turks must be warned so that they would get out of there, they would do nothing, so that the militants would not fire at our base, so we would brutally destroy all the terrorists in Idlib, so if the Turks want to save their military, then it’s better to leave from there, otherwise All losses of the Turkish military and their equipment, which came under the shelling of the SAA and our VKS, will be the responsibility of the Turkish side, since we warned them, well, if the Turks decide to develop a conflict, I don’t envy them, since ours will stop holding back the Kurds and give they will in their actions prot in Turks.
  17. Dmitry V. 11 February 2020 15: 35 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Nevertheless, despite the obvious effectiveness of air defense systems, Syrian militants do not leave any hope of causing at least some damage to the Khmeimim base.


    Yes, the same reason as with the Iron Dome - a rocket or a drone for $ 1000 is knocked down 30-100 times more expensive missile.
    Efficiency in terms of defeat is high.
    Economic efficiency is negative.
    Continue to improve drones combat capabilities.
  18. alex-sherbakov48 11 February 2020 15: 48 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Turkey needs to submit an ultimatum that if any weapon is hit on Russian military bases, then both the militants and Turkish troops that did not provide for the de-escalation of Idlib, which was hit at Russian bases, will also receive a missile strike !! !
    1. Dima_Anlim 11 February 2020 18: 02 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      the hammer then got stronger though?
      1. From Siberia we 12 February 2020 15: 20 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Erdogan turns our powers that way as he wants. Russia has long been a colony without its policies and sovereignty
        1. aliev58 12 February 2020 20: 09 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          You are not from Siberia, I am a Siberian! Russia Siberia grows Lomonosov.
    2. aliev58 12 February 2020 20: 06 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      It's time to test the calibers on the Turks.
  19. sagitch 11 February 2020 15: 59 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Turkish leadership claims that the attacks on the Syrian troops are exclusively retaliatory in nature:

    Here is the answer for our reason to destroy ALL militants in Idlib!
  20. Dima_Anlim 11 February 2020 18: 00 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    So, the President of Russia clearly said - the Russian armed forces arrived in Syria with one goal - to destroy the illegal armed groups - terrorists. And although the concept of "terrorists" for Assad and Putin is one thing, for the West it is different, for the United States the third, for Turkey the fourth. Turkey, Israel, the United States are not terrorist organizations for the world community. So Russia should not fight against their armed forces. Maximum - they will defend themselves in the event of aggression and strike back. Russia did not enter into military alliances with Syria on the condition of joint defense from external states. And this means a showdown of the Syrian government with foreign armies - Russia is not affected and Russia should not intervene militarily in them a priori. For such cases, there is the UN and other international platforms. And here a logical question - and is this not what Turkey and the United States are seeking - to provoke a war between the Assad (Syrian) forces and Turkey, the country of NATO? By the way, Erdogan has already begun to ask NATO for help in this matter. And isn’t this why the USA suddenly changed its mind to withdraw its troops from Syria and Iraq? They had a sniff with Turkey and decided - since it is already secretly impossible to supply arms and equipment to anti-Assad forces (Russia bomb them as terrorists), why not intervene in Turkey itself, having driven the very anti-Assad gangs under its banner and provoking a war between Assad ( Syria) and Turkey to hide the anti-Assad barmalei under the umbrella of the Turkish troops. Thus forcing Russia to stop bombing them. After all, Russia will not go to a direct military clash with Turkey. And since Turkey will already officially fight Syria, its troops, along with the barmales, can quite easily reach Damascus, where it will be a matter of a couple of days to drive out Assad. And then with the help of the United States and the United Nations put his gang in the government. And Russia will remain no destiny.
    1. From Siberia we 12 February 2020 15: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Turkey can move along with the militants and pave the way for them. Destroying the Syrian armed forces. and motivating it with a response to the attacks. So to speak a little blood.
      1. aliev58 12 February 2020 20: 13 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Russia is also slowly releasing troops in Constantinople in response to the occupation of Syria and slowly crushing Turkey like a rotten tomato.
  21. Yuri 11 February 2020 18: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Here is a rather interesting material on the topic with a meticulous analysis of all the tricks of the impudent sultan and their consequences for Russia:

    http://katyusha.org/view?id=13669&utm_source=warfiles.ru

    Some of the authors ’considerations seem quite controversial, but in one I agree with them 1000% - if Russia is nevertheless forced to make a very difficult decision and punish him by force, no one will intercede for him, but on the contrary, they will forget the words“ charter ”from the instinct of self-preservation "and" paragraph "and the number 5.
  22. dirk182 11 February 2020 19: 34 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Already the Americans are making statements regarding the strike of either the SAR Air Force or the Russian Air Force on the Turks in Syria ... it has long been said that a trap was originally being prepared for Russia in Syria. And Turkey is beginning to show itself in all its glory. About the blow to the Turks is the latest news.
  23. NordUral 11 February 2020 20: 24 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    That the Anglo-Saxons, that the Turks - one hell. Our world, which had completely gone astray, would not have jumped. to the big babah.
  24. stalker 75 12 February 2020 00: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    It is necessary for the Turks not only to supply the S-400. can a couple of vigorous loaves be thrown, are we friends now?
  25. Protos 12 February 2020 00: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: PSih2097
    only shell and pussy-willow missiles cost several times more, but orders of magnitude more than Chinese-built UAVs for $ 100-300 ... they need to be soaked from the main gun.

    Only now the cost is calculated from the cost of the protected air defense goals laughing
  26. Chaldon48 12 February 2020 01: 51 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Idlib, still that viper and all the same, the United States plays the main role in supporting terrorists if they hadn’t cleaned the barmolei there long ago.
    1. russia2016 12 February 2020 09: 53 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      At the moment, it is Turkey that is conducting a total war there, there is a direct annexation of the territories of Syria, Turkey has extensive experience in this (the last relatively recent example is the occupation of Cyprus). For Erdogan, the main strategy is pan-Turkism and the creation of a new formation of the Ottoman Empire. Of course, Erdogan broke off with Crimea, he thought it would be easy to squeeze him out of weak Kiev by populating him with a Turkic-speaking population and then occupying supposedly in order to protect the rights of Turkic Muslims (the same scenario as with Cyprus), but here Russia broke off all his plans. That's why he defends the “Ukrainian” Crimea and assured Kiev that he will never recognize Crimea as Russian.
  27. oracul 12 February 2020 07: 30 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    What is there to speculate about low cost or high cost and scoff at our guys, they are doing their right thing in this gadyushnik. Turks at all times were distinguished by cunning and willingness to stab in the back for their own interests. Our alliance with them is hardly long-term, as Erdogan dreams of a neo-Ottoman empire. Hence the invasion of Syria, and the sending of troops to Libya, and attacks on the Crimea, and attempts to strengthen influence in the Caucasus and Central Asia through Islamization. I do not think that our President and the General Staff have any illusions on this score. The game is on a large and on all fronts. By the way, the teeth of our "partner" of the USA stick out from everywhere, who dream together with NATO about a war with us, but only in the expectation of exhaustion, given the real scale of the comparison of our economy and their packs. Since a direct clash for the collective West today is fraught with enormous and irreparable losses, they will seek and use all the opportunities to exhaust us, attacking from different angles. Our allies: army, navy and territory with a harsh climate.
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. kriten 12 February 2020 11: 17 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Turks are friends buddies. If not themselves, then, according to their instructions, their main allies are terrorists. Destroy them do not have to lament, and the Turks have nothing to spare. Along with the terrorists, get it.
  30. Spiridonovich2 12 February 2020 11: 50 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Do drones fly from somewhere? For the first time, to warn, if they don’t calm down, to launch a missile strike of such power that peace, order, and quiet and sober peace come, those who indulge in drones and other means against the Russian military.
  31. ochakow703 12 February 2020 12: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I remember someone in a high chair who said that we would not only destroy the means of delivery, but also strike at the territories where they started ... it's time.
  32. Yuri 12 February 2020 18: 33 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    One comrade below comments, trying to whitewash their brother in front of other readers in the spirit that Kuwait and some other uncle are to blame for the tricks of the Basmachi hiding under the Turkish wing. (This is their form of folk art, inventing an alternative reality is clever in terms of the situation. Especially when there is a threat to anger Russia).

    I’m talking about this: if the Supreme’s patience nevertheless bursts, then, I assure you, my friends, the VKS will not have time to complete the first combat mission in the Turks, as Tayipych, having lavished on a large scale, will run to call Moscow, and his excuses will sound like this. It will blame everyone from Kuwait to someone's aunt, the switchmen will sort out, confused in the testimony. And then he will collect his junk and get out of Syria. And there will be no big war. Because they are only much against the weak, with multiple numerical superiority and, preferably, from around the corner or on a dark night.

    This does not mean that the enemy can be underestimated, but this certainly should not be feared. (Meanwhile, from yesterday he became even more insolent). And please, do not say that the states will go for possible destruction for them
  33. VladMur 12 February 2020 18: 48 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Is it time to write in quotation marks "Syrian militants." What do you think?
    1. Ros 56 29 February 2020 09: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      We consider negative they should be written off for a long time without any quotes.
  34. SeregaBoss 13 February 2020 08: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is necessary to finish, it is necessary. There is no other way to agree.
  35. CBR600 13 February 2020 10: 21 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    More like the version with the Mossad.
    But the note does not indicate the result of the attack.
  36. tank64rus 15 February 2020 21: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In the world, only power is respected and only power is considered. We forgot with a hunchback and paid a monstrous price for it.
  37. Ros 56 29 February 2020 09: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is necessary to beat these barmalei without any pity, the fewer they will be, the calmer in the country. All the less they will bark in the west. At the same time, explain to Eric the Ottoman how to build a bridge, along or across the river.