Turkey once again failed to appear on joint patrols

47

Once again, Turkey did not send its border guards to participate in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria near the Syrian-Turkish border. This was stated by the head of the Russian Center for the Reconciliation of the warring parties in the SAR, Major General Yuri Borenkov.

Due to the lack of Turkish troops, Russian police patrolled several routes on their own. Patrolling took place in the provinces of Hasek, Alleppo and Raqqa. All tasks planned as part of the patrol have been completed in full.



In connection with the non-arrival of the Turkish side, to participate in the joint patrol, the units of the Russian military police unilaterally patrolled (...). Air patrols were also carried out.

- said Borenkov.

At the same time, Russian air defense systems covering the Khmeimim airbase repelled two attacks on Sunday dronestrying to get closer to a Russian military facility.

According to Borenkov, the Pantsir-S air defense missile defense system from the air base of the air base intercepted unmanned aerial vehicles launched by militants at a considerable distance from the Khmeyim air base. In the first case, the target was hit at a distance of 2 km from the base, in the second - at 6 km, no damage was done to the air base.

No injuries or material damage. Russian Hmeimim air base operates as planned

- said in a statement.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    11 February 2020 08: 56
    Yanachars, wonderful partners and allies.
    1. +3
      11 February 2020 08: 58
      Erdogan is offended!
      1. +8
        11 February 2020 09: 08
        With the joint patrol, it was probably over. request
        1. +3
          11 February 2020 10: 21
          And this is generally a bell about cooperation.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. -2
          11 February 2020 11: 31
          It seems that Erdogan squeezed Faberge well to our leadership. Well, really! How can Putin answer Erdogan? Refuses to build a nuclear power plant? Cancel the supply of S-400? Cut the pipe? All this is done seems to be the money of Russia. And who will suffer? Erdogan made a losing move? KPD kirdyk? Or was it a tricky amateur plan? Or is it a GDP trap? What is losing and losing Erdogan? It is interesting to know the opinion of supporters of GDP.
          1. -4
            11 February 2020 11: 38
            We are partners !!!! As you do not understand !!!! we, the Russian Federation, always fulfill our obligations (well, like Nicholas 2, got into an unnecessary war), Pu, a man of his word, though for some reason, obligations and promises to our own people are not fulfilled, well, the people are not partners.
            1. -2
              11 February 2020 11: 48
              Yeah! Partners! So I want to sneak! Something our partners are too active and are actively using us! Why are we (the leadership) so passive? Do we (management) like and enjoy? What is our management so concerned about? There are sexually preoccupied. What are our people thinking about? About your dough over the hill? Well, it’s disgusting to the terrible behavior of our (or already not our) leaders. It seems that this masochism will never end under the current system. How to tighten the nuts of the population, since good morning! How to embed partners in the forehead, so you can’t bag! am
          2. +1
            11 February 2020 11: 48
            Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
            It seems that Erdogan squeezed Faberge well
            If something is compressed somewhere, then it is not necessary to project this feeling on geopolitics, and even publicly be interested in its interpretations.
            1. -4
              11 February 2020 11: 50
              And I suspect everything is unclenching! Where and when did we screw someone? Why is Russia always pressed? What are we clamped to?
              1. +1
                11 February 2020 12: 11
                Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
                And I suspect everything is unclenching! Where and when did we screw someone? Why is Russia always pressed? What are we clamped to?
                Are you always so suspicious, or purely towards those who object to you? Pinched and pressed where? In Syria? Erdogan ?! He did not appear for joint patrol, but he was shown that there was little loss, they spent it themselves. If all of us are pressed there, then why do they fly here regularly to negotiate? Or can we compare what was happening in Syria before our presence, and what now?
                1. -1
                  11 February 2020 12: 20
                  Well, then compare.
                  The Turkish armed forces hit 101 targets of the Syrian government army in response to shelling in Idlib, the Turkish Defense Ministry said.


                  “According to preliminary data, 115 targets of the Syrian army were shot at, 101 targets were hit, including three tanks destroyed and one helicopter shot down. The operation continues, ”the agency said in a statement.
                  Who and when did Russia shell?
                  1. +1
                    11 February 2020 12: 25
                    Quote: SOVIET UNION 2
                    Who and when did Russia shell?
                    Shaitanov, when necessary, but what? Anyone else needed?
                    1. -1
                      11 February 2020 12: 28
                      And who are the shaitans? Are those the ones who brought oil to Erdogan? Then it turns out that Putin deprived Erdogan of the business and harmed him! Putin compensated for the damage by the Turkish Stream? We will see!
    2. +3
      11 February 2020 09: 38
      What is the point of this patrol? Once again run into a land mine barmaley? Or be thrown at the stones of a joyful crowd?
      1. -3
        11 February 2020 09: 52
        Can indicate a presence? Do not sit in block posts like the Americans in Afghanistan.
        1. +1
          11 February 2020 11: 46
          Can indicate a presence?

          Who to designate? Moreover, together with the Turks, who are the main puppeteers. The Americans simply staked out the oil-bearing areas and they hit the drum before these patrols.
          1. -1
            11 February 2020 11: 48
            We designate that we are here, and vigil.
          2. -1
            11 February 2020 20: 41
            during the famous journey of Catherine 2 to the Crimea, the Aglitsky ambassador asked Potemkin — why did Russia need such a fleet on the Black Sea, to which the Most Serene answered - What would no one else ask. So here, that would barmaley sensed)))) that they can get in the repunds.
      2. +5
        11 February 2020 10: 23
        The point was to demonstrate a common position and commitment to a peaceful resolution of the conflict, which apparently no longer exists, and there is nothing to rejoice about. There is no need for a clash with Turkey in Russia. She just won’t take it out.


        On the other hand, Ukrainian transit was extended for another 5 years, and now the Turk-Stream is already being obtained so far not really needed ...
        1. +2
          11 February 2020 10: 50
          General position? In fact, it is not and was not, there were only words from the Turks.
          1. +3
            11 February 2020 11: 22
            In my opinion, a very large "conflict potential" is buried there in Syria for all players, including Russia and Turkey. It was very surprising to look at how suddenly it turned out that Russia and Turkey are "brothers forever." The position of Russia in Syria is very "on the brink" and then not on one.
        2. 0
          11 February 2020 11: 40
          The point was to demonstrate a common position and commitment to a peaceful resolution to the conflict

          Military equipment is the best way to a peaceful settlement?
          1. -1
            11 February 2020 11: 48
            Military equipment is the best way to a peaceful settlement?

            On a joint patrol? Rather, yes, although there were excesses about which everyone here knows.
  2. +6
    11 February 2020 09: 03
    Divorce and maiden name ??? Again and again?
    1. 0
      11 February 2020 21: 57
      But we don’t fall in love with the Turks)))))) the past interferes)))
      1. 0
        12 February 2020 06: 50
        Quote: Lamata
        But we don’t fall in love with the Turks)))))) the past interferes)))

        The past, it is the past. Who did it stop if it was NECESSARY?
        Reeling, back and forth, of all sorts of cunning ... made, is the reason for the displeasure of the co-workers ... than there, or rather, not passing along.
  3. +6
    11 February 2020 09: 18
    What kind of joint patrolling is there, who else believes in this circus !? The Turks openly sponsor all Islamic terrorists in Syria in order to overthrow Assad, and they lay down .... on Russia and all its attempts to somehow resolve the situation in Syria. It looks like the creation of a new Turkic-Alkaid-Ishil state in Syria is not far off. And we must not forget the fact that Erdogan is the main ally of Russia, and he always reminds us of this at the first opportunity, as recently in Ukraine, when he happily yelled at the top of his lungs - "Glory to Ukraine", and that Turkey will never recognize annexation Crimea by Russia.
    1. -1
      11 February 2020 09: 31
      I absolutely agree! +++++++++
      They will soon openly fight with Russia in Syria. If you have not started!
  4. -4
    11 February 2020 09: 26
    The Turks were allowed to lay the pipe "in their own area" and now have full carte blanche in Syria. Braces do not intersect in an interesting way. We now have hurray # 1 and # 2 Poland and Bulgaria. Guess why.
  5. +4
    11 February 2020 09: 26
    Turkey will never be a normal partner, especially militarily, for Russia. Not for nothing that Peter 1 was saying - do not trust the Turk .....
  6. +3
    11 February 2020 09: 41
    According to Borenkov, the Pantsir-S air defense missile system from the air defense of the airbase intercepted unmanned aerial vehicles launched by the militants at a considerable distance from the Khmeyim airbase.
    When we have full-fledged shock drones there to "extinguish" such "model aircraft-terrorists", right at the launch site of the "models"
  7. +2
    11 February 2020 09: 46
    They didn't show up, well, okay, because that's their problem. Joint patrolling was discussed as a measure of confidence after the talks in Astana. As a matter of principle, the Turks nullify this measure of confidence. Then you shouldn't be offended if the blow inflicted on the militants affects the Turkish military, behind which the bandits are hiding. Moreover, they did not fulfill their obligations to breed "moderate" and "immoderate" (all the bandits) in Idlib.
    1. 0
      11 February 2020 10: 00
      In this case, the dog barks the caravan goes.
  8. +3
    11 February 2020 09: 51
    Turkey once again failed to appear on joint patrols

    It’s time for us to stop patrolling, provided that the Turks don’t get out of Idlib,
    we will again open the border zone of Syria with Turkey for the Kurds.
  9. +1
    11 February 2020 10: 10
    Someone is tired of this circus.
  10. 0
    11 February 2020 10: 23
    So toadstool cooked with interception patrol
  11. +1
    11 February 2020 10: 24
    Quote: Romka
    The Turks were allowed to lay the pipe "in their own area" and now have full carte blanche in Syria. Braces do not intersect in an interesting way. We now have hurray # 1 and # 2 Poland and Bulgaria. Guess why.

    So Poland and Bulgaria do not pretend to be our friends, and openly pursue a hostile policy, unlike Turkey, which sings about eternal love and friendship while Russian money flows into the Turkish economy, but in reality every day new sticks of scimitar stick in our backs . So who else is a really dangerous enemy - as they say, a big question!
  12. 0
    11 February 2020 10: 50
    Turkey once again did not send its border guards to participate in joint patrols with Russia in northern Syria

    With a solarium, probably a problem ... request
  13. +1
    11 February 2020 11: 05
    He who patrols is in control ...
  14. 0
    11 February 2020 12: 19
    Turkey once again failed to appear on joint patrols
    It's okay, you need to attract Kurds for joint patrolling. I think they will agree. bully
  15. 0
    11 February 2020 12: 25
    As they say, a woman with a cart, the mare is easier. Maybe the saying is not quite right, but we can do without the Turks, even if they don’t whine later.
  16. 0
    11 February 2020 21: 59
    I’ve already voiced somewhere on this site, they’re missing Nakhimov !!!
  17. 0
    15 February 2020 10: 16
    Such a feeling is that the Turks are afraid of Russian soldier