Two U.S. military killed in clash with Afghan military

28
Two U.S. military killed in clash with Afghan military

Two US troops in Afghanistan were killed and six were injured in varying degrees of severity in the Afghan province of Nangarhar during an attack by an unknown man dressed in the uniform of the Afghan army. This was announced by the representative of the US Armed Forces in Afghanistan, Colonel Sonny Leggett.

Two U.S. troops were killed and six others were injured in a shootout on February 8 in the Sherzad area of ​​Nangarhar province, current reports indicate that a man in Afghan uniform opened fire from a machine gun at the combined forces of the United States and Afghanistan. We are still collecting information; the cause or motive of the attack is currently unknown

- said in a statement.



In turn, the New York Times, citing Afghan and American officials, writes that the shootout occurred between the Afghan and American troops during a joint operation. Reuters reports that Afghanistan’s security services have announced a clash between US and Afghan government forces.

Currently, not one of the groups operating in Afghanistan has claimed responsibility for the attack on the US military. Earlier, local media wrote about a clash between government forces and the US military, which led to the deaths of military personnel on both sides. It was a question of losses on both sides, in particular, the deaths of six Afghan soldiers and "five to six Americans."


    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    28 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +14
      9 February 2020 08: 53
      Probably some kind of Afghan took revenge on the Americans for the death of his relatives.
      Revenge is there in the order of things ... the Soviet machine gun was probably ... it would be nice to see the shootout video. what
      1. +8
        9 February 2020 09: 09
        Everything is muddy there. Here in "The New York Times" it is published that this could have been the result of a shootout during a joint exercise. It looks like a "friendly fire".
        https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/08/world/asia/afghan-us-soldiers-shooting-deaths.html
        However, the publication notes that it is not yet completely clear what really happened: was there a shootout between the American and Afghan military, or they disappeared together under fire from IS militants (banned in Russia) or the Taliban (the Taliban movement also banned in the Russian Federation as a terrorist organization).
        1. +11
          9 February 2020 09: 43
          To paraphrase Professor Preobrazhensky, don’t read American newspapers in the morning, don’t read any, because they are all fake news, as Comrade Trump used to say.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. +6
              9 February 2020 10: 01
              You have strained with logic, it happens, but it is treated. Don't confuse news media with talk shows. Heal Volodya and you will be happy, you are our homegrown troll.
              1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +2
            9 February 2020 11: 10
            I paraphrase Professor Preobrazhensky ...

            Professors Preobrazhensky sculpt to a place and not a place.
            In this case, we are discussing news from VO. Yes, maybe it is from a different source, and not first-hand. But in any case, Professor Preobrazhensky spoke about something completely different. And as an educated person, I read the newspapers all the same.
            1. 0
              9 February 2020 12: 15
              So what was Professor Preobrazhensky talking about? But I know for sure that it’s not about Americans, he couldn’t even think that they would think of using death’s slogan to bring death all over the world. hi
        2. +1
          9 February 2020 12: 02
          Quote: DMB 75
          . Here in "The New York Times" it was published that it could be the result of a firefight during a joint exercise. It looks like a "friendly fire".

          It doesn’t matter, by and large: the result is important.
          And the result is that the United States go home faster...
      2. +5
        9 February 2020 09: 18
        Quote: The same LYOKHA
        Probably some kind of Afghan took revenge on the Americans for the death of his relatives.
        Revenge is there in the order of things.

        I also thought about it right away .. Hatred of the United States is already going through the roof .. How they all got with their bloody democracy .. They can’t sit on their continent ..
        1. +2
          9 February 2020 10: 02
          Two U.S. military killed in clash with Afghan military
          "A la guerre comme à la guerre" gentlemen ....
          1. -3
            9 February 2020 10: 14
            Quote: Dead Day
            Two U.S. military killed in clash with Afghan military
            "A la guerre comme à la guerre" gentlemen ....

            Gentlemen in America, and then comrades .. And we know how to fight .. It is to fight, and not to provoke and other meannesses to arrange and pit peoples .. hi
            1. +3
              9 February 2020 10: 17
              Quote: Smuta
              Gentlemen in America, and then comrades

              and I am "mikhan", and I didn't tell you that ..
              1. -2
                9 February 2020 11: 57
                Quote: Dead Day
                Quote: Smuta
                Gentlemen in America, and then comrades

                and I am "mikhan", and I didn't tell you that ..

                And I to you! soldier wink
                So what ? Want to argue about this ..
        2. +2
          9 February 2020 11: 09
          And why love them, especially in Afghanistan? In 20 years, they built one gas station (for 43 lemons - they sawed it well), and it wasn’t for Afghans, but for themselves ... And that’s all, the rest of the effect is that the drug trade, which was crushed by the Taliban, has blossomed. Hitler weeps with envy - this is precisely the destruction of the population through its artificial degradation - genocide
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +3
        9 February 2020 10: 43
        The machine gun may be good, but the shooter is not very good. When shooting at close range, only two "screw-ups" will not be enough.
    2. +4
      9 February 2020 09: 04
      I will not regret, they knew what they were going for! Other drugs turned out to be more expensive than their lives? ??
    3. +7
      9 February 2020 09: 09
      Friendly fire is a common occurrence in hostilities ..
      1. 0
        9 February 2020 09: 59
        Quote: Dikson
        Friendly fire is a common occurrence in hostilities ..

        After all, the USA is the best friend of all mankind! fellow
    4. +4
      9 February 2020 09: 14
      One failed two soldiers and injured six ?! The hunter however. Looks well prepared.
    5. +5
      9 February 2020 09: 15
      Why don't I feel sorry for them? Is it reddened? People are the same. What did they forget in Afghanistan?
    6. +1
      9 February 2020 09: 33
      Afghans ask: “An American soldier gets $ 10 a month, and an Afghan soldier gets $ 200. WHO will serve in such an army? ”
      Kabul residents complain: "The Americans taught the Afghans theft and corruption, and the Soviet taught the creation."
    7. 0
      9 February 2020 09: 52
      a man in Afghan uniform opened fire from a machine gun at the combined forces of the United States and Afghanistan
      That sounds good.
      So right on everyone, and immediately, and opened.
      Anyone who writes articles himself reads what he wrote?
      Or is it specially done to make it interesting and attentive to study the text and seek out such neologisms?
      1. +1
        9 February 2020 12: 15
        Quote: demo
        a man in Afghan uniform opened fire from a machine gun at the combined forces of the United States and Afghanistan
        That sounds good.
        So right on everyone, and immediately, and opened.
        Anyone who writes articles himself reads what he wrote?
        Or is it specially done to make it interesting and attentive to study the text and seek out such neologisms?

        There is no problem. What the author of the article doesn’t like is that you need to look at other sources. Here are the Afghans themselves - confirm.
        https://twitter.com/TGhazniwal
    8. +1
      9 February 2020 11: 38
      Two US troops were killed and six more were injured.
      They didn’t stroll into Afghanistan for a walk, but supposedly to fight terrorism, which by and large they themselves gave birth to.
      the cause or motive of the attack is currently unknown
      Well, it turns out the reasons are "unknown". You, that you have arrived in a friendly country on an official visit, but you were badly received there?
    9. 0
      9 February 2020 12: 57
      So there is no war game Zarnitsa.
    10. 0
      9 February 2020 13: 35
      Suleimani is working. ..)
    11. 0
      9 February 2020 16: 24
      And how many Americans died during the occupation of Afghanistan? Any statistics?
    12. 0
      9 February 2020 20: 52
      Watering the devils is necessary. As I did in 83
    13. 0
      10 February 2020 01: 40
      they never admit that one - even let the teenager put down 6 trained military men. And we in Afghanistan and Chechnya have lost!

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"