The law is outside of science, science is outside of the law


Р • жегодно 8 С „еврР° Р» СЏ СЂРѕСЃСЃРёР№СЃРєРѕРµ РЅР ° СѓС З РЅРѕРµ СЃРѕРѕР ± С ‰ есСРІР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °РПРР R ° РµС ‚СЃРІРѕР№ РїСЂРѕС„ ессионР° Р »СЊРЅС‹ Р№ РїСЂР ° Р · РґРЅРёРє †“Р” ень СЂРѕСЃСЃРёР№СЃРєРѕРѓР °Р °РєРєР ° Р RS‚РѕС ‚день Р ± С‹ Р »СѓС ‡ реждС'РЅ СѓРєР ° Р · РѕРј преР· идентР° Р Р¤ РІ 1999 РіРѕРґСѓ. Рђ РґРѕ того, 8 С Р РµРІСЂР ° Р »СЏ (28 СЏРЅРІР ° СЂСЏ РїРѕ стР° СЂРѕРјСѓ стил СЋ) 1724 РіРѕРґРјСРјР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °РјР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ° Рего СенР° тР° РїРѕ СЂР ° споряжению ПетрР° I РІ Р РѕСЃСЃРёРё Р ± С ‹Р» Р ° РѕСЃРЅРѕРІР ° РЅР ° РґРјР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ° Р '1925 РіРѕРґСѓ РѕРЅР ° Р ± С ‹Р» Р ° переименоовР° РЅР ° РІ РђРєР ° демию РЅР ° СѓРє РЎРЎєѓЎЎЎ,, Р ° РІ 1991


In general, there is continuity. The Decree that established this day states that the holiday was established, "given the prominent role of domestic science in the development of the state and society, following historical traditions and to mark the 275th anniversary of the founding of the Academy of Sciences in Russia. ”

ОтР»РёС ‡ РЅРѕ. РџРѕР · РґСЂР ° РІРёРј РІСЃРµС ... СЂРѕСЃСЃРёР№СЃРєРёС ... СѓС ‡ РµРЅС ‹С ..., Рё С‚РµС ..., кто РїСЂР ° Р · днует С… Р ° Р ... Р Р Р „РСРЕР„ Р ° Р ... Рѕ РїРѕ стР° СЂРёРЅРєРµ РСРРРРРРРРЏРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРР .

КстР° ти, РѕР ± РЎРЎРЎР. Рнтересно, РІ Советском РЎРѕСЋР · Рµ Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅР ° Рѕ РЅР ° СѓРєРµ РЅРµ Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ. РљР ° Рє РЅРµ Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ его Рё РІ Р РѕСЃСЃРёР№СЃРєРѕР№ империи. P — P ° PєPsPЅP ° PЅPµ Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ, РЅРѕ РЅР ° СѓРєР ° Р ± С ‹Р» Р °. РЎР »РѕР¶РЅРѕ СЃРєР ° Р · Р ° ть, РєР ° Рє РІРѕРѕР ± С ‰ Рµ РјРѕРіР» Рё СЂР ° Р · РІРёРІР ° тьсятР° СЂРѕСЃСЃРёР№СЃРµС °РµС °РµС °Р °С °РµС °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °Р °С °РµС °РѕС °РѕС °Р °С °Р °С °РµС °РµС °Р RЅR SѓRєRo ° F ± RμR · SЂRμRіSѓR "RoSЂRѕRІR ° RЅRoSЏ RЅR ° F · ° F RєRѕRЅRѕRґR ° S,RμR" SЊRЅRѕRј SѓSЂRѕRІRЅRμ, RЅRѕ SЂR ° F · ° F RІRoRІR "RoSЃSЊ R¶RμvЂ|

RЎRμRіRѕRґRЅSЏ PI SѓRїSЂR ° RІR "RμRЅS ‡ RμSЃRєRoS ... RєSЂSѓRіR ° C ... P RѕSЃSЃRoRo RІS <SЃS € RμRіRѕ SѓSЂRѕRІRЅSЏ P ± C <S,SѓRμS, RјRЅRμRЅRoRμ C ‡ ± RμR S,Rѕ P · C 'RμRґRμSЂR ° F" SЊRЅRѕRіRѕ P · Р ° РєРѕРЅР ° Рѕ РЅР ° СѓРєРµ СЃР ° РјРѕР№ РЅР ° СѓРєРё РєР ° Рє тР° РєРѕРІРѕР№ Рё Р ± С ‹С‚СЊ РЅРµ может. RќRμRІRѕR · RјRѕR¶RЅRѕ RѕR RμSЃRїRμS ± ‡ RoS,SЊ RґRѕR "R¶RЅRѕRμ SЂR ° F · RІRoS,RoRμ Ryo SЃRѕSЃS,RѕSЏRЅRoRμ RЅR SѓRєRo ° F ± RμR SЃRѕRѕS,RІRμS,SЃS,RІSѓSЋS ‰ · P · P RμR№ ° RєRѕRЅRѕRґR ° тельной Р ± Р ° Р · С‹. P • СЃР »Рё РіРѕСЃСѓРґР ° рсство РґРѕР» жно РІРєР »Р ° РґС‹ РИР ° ться РИ РЅР ° СѓРєСѓ, Р · РЅР ° С З З РёС », ¶ґ¶ѕ RIRSRIP ° ть РІСЃРµ СЃРѕРѕС‚РІРµС‚СЃС‚РІСѓСЋС ‰ РёРµ Р ° РєС‚С ‹Рё документы, РІ том С ‡ РёСЃРµ Р ° Р ° Р ° Р ° РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЊРЅРЅРЊРЅРЅРЊРЊРЅРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊРЊР ° РєРѕРЅ Рѕ РЅР ° СѓРєРµ.

РЎРѕРіР »Р ° СЃРёРјСЃСЏ?

R ”ействител СЊРЅРѕ, если РјС‹ РЅРµ СЃРѕР ± РёСЂР ° емся идти РЫРѕ СЃРѕРјР €Р €Р €Р €Р €Р €Р €РЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРєРЅРЅРЅРЅРєРЅРЅРєРЅРєРєРєРєРєРєРєРЅРєРЅРЅРєРЅРЅРЅРєРЅРєРЅРЅРЅРєРєРЅРЅРЅРЅ RїSЂRμRґRєRo PI SЃRѕRІRμS,SЃRєRѕRμ RІSЂRμRјSЏ, S,Rѕ RІSЃRμ RґRѕR »P ± R¶RЅRѕ C <S,SЊ RoRјRμRЅRЅRѕ S,R ° Rє: C † RoRІRoR" Röhr · RѕRІR ° RЅRЅRѕ, Ryo RІRЅSЏS,RЅRѕ SЋSЂRoRґRoS ‡ RμSЃRєRo RіSЂR ° RјRѕS ‚РЅРѕ.

РќР ° верное, РёРЅЅС‚ересно РїСЂРѕСЃР »РµРґРёС‚СЊ путь Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅР ° РІ РЅР ° СѓРёСѓ, РёР» Рё РЅР ·Р · Р ·Р ·Р · Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °

RџRѕRЅSЏS,RЅRѕ C ‡ S,Rѕ Sѓ RЅR SЃ RμSЃS,SЊ RєRѕRјSѓ ° F · ° F RЅSЏS,SЊSЃSЏ RіRѕSЃSѓRґR ° SЂSЃS,RІRμRЅRЅS <Rј SЂRμRіSѓR "RoSЂRѕRІR ° RЅRoRμRј RЅR ° SѓS ‡ RЅRѕR№ RѕS,SЂR ° SЃR" Pd. R RI 1994 R_RsRґSѓ SЃРёР »RsСЋ RіСЂРѕР · РЅРѕСЋ РЅР ° С З Р ° Р» Рё СЃРѕР · РґР ° РІР ° ть Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅ Рѕ РЅР ° СѓРєРµ. РЎРѕР · РґР ° РІР ° Р »Рё РЅРµ С ‰ Р ° РґСЏ живвотР° своего, Рё РІ итоге РІ Р“ РѕСЃРґСѓРјРµ РѕРєР ° Р · Р ° Р ° Р ° Р ° РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ РЃ Р ° Р R ° конопроектР°. RџRμSЂRІS <R№ ± F C <F "SЃRѕR · RґR ° of the PS SЃR RјRoRјRo RґRμRїSѓS,R ° ° ° S,R RјRo P" RѕSЃRґSѓRјS <RІS,RѕSЂRѕR№ â € "RєRѕRјRoSЃSЃRoRμR№ RїSЂRo RїSЂR ° RІRoS,RμR" SЊSЃS,RІRμ Рё третий Р ± С ‹Р» подготовлен РІ Совете ФедерР° С † РёРё.

Понятно, СЗ С‚Рѕ тогдР° Сѓ Р • Р Р ± РѕР »СЊС € инствР° РІ Р Рµ тР° к… СЃ РІР ° СЂРёР ° нтР° РјРё. RџRѕS,RѕRјSѓ RїSЂRoS € P "RѕSЃSЊ SЃRѕR · RґR ° S,SЊ SЃRѕRіR" P ° SЃRoS,RμR "SЊRЅSѓSЋ RєRѕRјRoSЃSЃRoSЋ Röhr · ° F RІS,RѕSЂRѕRІ RІSЃRμS ... ... S,SЂRμS RїSЂRѕRμRєS,RѕRІ Ryo SЃRґRμR" P S,SЊ ° C ‡ то-то тР° РєРѕРµ, типР° В “три РІ РѕРґРЅРѕРјВ”.

КстР° ти, РїРѕР »СѓС ‡ РёР» РѕСЃСЊ. R І 1995 RіРѕРґСѓ РїСЂРѕРµРєС ‚Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅР ° РїСЂРёС € ел РІ Р “РѕСЃРґСѓРјСѓ. Рђ РІ октяР± СЂРµ РґР ° же Р ± С ‹Р» РїСЂРёРЅСЏС ‚РІ первом С З С‚РµРЅРёРё. РЎ РІС‚РѕСЂС ‹Рј Рё третьим РїРѕР» СѓС ‡ РёР »РѕСЃСЊ РєР ° Рє РѕР ± С‹ С З РЅРѕ. R ”епутР° ты СЃРїРµС € РёР »Рё, РЅР ° РЅРѕСЃСѓ Р ± С‹ Р »Рё РсС З РµСЂРµРґРЅС‹ Рµ РІС ‹Р ± РѕСЂС‹ -РїРµСЂРµРІС ‹Р ± СЗ С‚Рѕ, РєРѕРµ-РєР ° Рє РЅР ° РїРёСЃР ° РІ, Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅ передР° Р »Рё РґР ° Р» СЊС € Рµ.

RЎRїRμS € RєR ° SЃRєR ° F · P ° R "SЃSЊ RЅR ° F ° C ° RєR ‡ RμSЃS,RІRμ S,RμRєSЃS,R °, RїRѕSЌS,RѕRјSѓ, RїRμSЂRμRґ S,RμRј RєR ° Rє RѕS,RїSЂR ° F RІRoS,SЊ · ° F RєRѕRЅ RґR "SЏ RѕRґRѕR ± SЂRμRЅRoSЏ PI RЎRѕRІRμS, R¤RμRґRμSЂR ° C RoRo † P · ° F RєRѕRЅ SЂRμS € Röhr" Ryo In "RЅRμRјRЅRѕRіRѕV" RїRѕRґRїSЂR ° RІRoS,SЊ. RЎRѕRІRμS, R¤RμRґRμSЂR ° C † RoRo RЅR ° SЌS,Rѕ RЅRμ RѕR SЂR ° ± S,RoR "RІRЅRoRјR ° RЅRoSЏ, Ryo RѕRґRѕR ± SЂRoRІ, RїRμSЂRμRґR ° F" RґR "SЏ RїRѕRґRїRoSЃR ° RЅRoSЏ RїSЂRμR · RoRґRμRЅS,Sѓ.

P ”P ° P” СЊС € Рµ Р ± С ‹Р» Рѕ совсем интересно. R 'РђРџ никто РЅРёРєСѓРґР ° РЅРµ СЃРїРµС € РёР », потому текст… РёР · СѓС ‡ РёР» Ryo! R'RsR »RµRµ того, RµРіРѕ РїСЂРѕС ‡ итР° Р» Рё Р »СЋРґРё, которы Рµ РїРѕРЅРёРјР ° Р »Рё, С З С‚Рѕ РѕРЋРЅР ° С! R R · R ° RєRsRЅ RІРµСЂРЅСѓР »Рё РѕР ± СЂР ° тно, RїРѕС‚РѕРјСѓ С З С‚Рѕ эти В СЊРєРѕ РёР · менили суть документР°.

P · RїSЂRμR RoRґRμRЅS, RїRѕRґRїRoSЃR ° S,SЊ Röhr "Ryo RѕS,RєR" RѕRЅRoS,SЊ RRўRћ RЅRμ RјRѕRі, RїRѕSЃRєRѕR "SЊRєSѓ S,RμRєSЃS,, RєRѕS,RѕSЂS <R№ In" RїSЂRѕRіR "SЏRґRμR" roar "PI RЎRѕRІS" RμRґRμ , РЅРµ Р ± С ‹Р» текстом, РєРѕС‚РѕСЂС ‹Р№ РїСЂРёРЅСЏР» Рё РІ Р “РѕСЃРґСѓРјРµ.

РҐРѕСЂРѕС € Р ° ситуР° С † РёСЏ, РїСЂР ° РІРґР °?

RћR ± СЂР ° Р · РѕРІР ° Р »СЃСЏ СЋСЂРёРґРёС З РµСЃРєРёР№ тупик, РІС‹ С ... РѕРґ РёР · которого тР° Рє Рё РЅ Рё РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ Рµ Рµ Рµ Рµ Рµ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅ РЅРЅ РџСЂРѕРµРєС ‚Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅР ° вернул Рё РєР ° Рє Р ± С ‹РЅР ° 2,75 С З С‚РµРЅРёРµ, Р ° Рє тем 80-ти РІРѕРІРЕСРРРРРІРРРРІРРРРІРРРРРІРРРРРРІРРРРРІРРРІРРРРРІРРРРРІРРРРРІРРРРІРРРРРІРРРРРІРРРІРРРРРІРРРРРІРР Рµ РІ РІСЂРµРґС € РµСЃС‚РІСѓСЋС ‰ ем In «РІС‚РѕСЂРѕРјВ» С З С‚РµРЅРёРё Р ± С ‹Р

ФедерР° Р »СЊРЅС‹ Р№ Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅ В «Рћ РЅР ° СѓРєРµ Рё РіРѕСЃСѓРґР ° рственной РЅР ° РѓРѓРРР… Р ... Ѕ РѕРіРµ Р ± С ‹Р» РїСЂРёРЅСЏС ‚Рё 23 Р ° вгустР° 1996 РіРѕРґР ° РїРѕРґРїРёСЃР ° РЅ преР· идентом РѕРєРЃР °Р °Р °Р °Р °РЃР °Р °РЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃ RЎS "RμSЂR RЅR ° ° ± SѓRєRo RїSЂRoRѕR SЂRμR" P ° SЃSЂR ° F · ° Sѓ RґRІR RіRѕSЃSѓRґR ° SЂSЃS,RІRμRЅRЅS <C ... RґRѕRєSѓRјRμRЅS,R °: P "RѕRєS,SЂRoRЅSѓ SЂR ° F · RІRoS,RoSЏ SЂRѕSЃSЃRoR№SЃRєRѕR№ RЅR ° СѓРєРё, утвержденную СѓРєР ° Р · РѕРј преР· идентР°, Рё Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅ.

RџRμSЂRoRѕRґ, RєRѕRіRґR ° RѕS,RЅRѕS € RμRЅRoSЏ PI RЅR ° SѓS ‡ RЅRѕ-S,RμS ... RЅRoS RμSЃRєRѕR№ RѕR ‡ ± R »R ° ° SЃS,Ro SЃS,SЂR RЅS <SЂRμRіSѓR" RoSЂRѕRІR ° F "RoSЃSЊ SЌS,RoRјRo RґRІSѓRјSЏ РЅРѕСЂРјР ° С‚РёРІРЅС ‹РјРё РїСЂР ° РІРѕРІС‹ РјРё Р ° ктР° РјРё, Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅС З РёР »СЃСЏ РѕС ‡ ень Р ± С‹ СЃСЂС. R'RјRµСЃС‚Рµ СЃ РіРѕСЃСѓРґР ° СЂСЃС‚С‚РІРµРЅРЅС ‹РёРё ееньгР° РјРё, ооторы Рµ РІС ‹РµРµР» СЏР »РёСЃР …РёСЃ¶ ... Р — Р ° то вместо денег РЅР ° С З Р ° Р »Рё СЃС‹ РїР ° ться РІСЃРµ РЅРѕРІС ‹Рµ Рё РЅРѕРІС‰РЅС °РЂС СР СР СР ССЂ ‡ РЅС ‹Рµ Рё РѕРєРѕР» РѕРЅР ° СѓС З РЅС ‹Рµ РѕС‚РЅРѕС € ения.

РњР ° СЃСЃР ° Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅРѕРІ, РєРѕС‚РѕСЂС ‹Рµ РїРѕРґСЂР ° Р · умевР° СЋС‚ РІРѕРґ СЃРѕР ± РѕР№РєРёРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРґРѕРґРґРґРґРґРѕРЬР РІСЂРѕРґРµ Р ± С ‹РЅР ° СѓР» СѓС ‡ С € ение РёСЃСЃР »РµРґРѕРІР ° РЅРёР№, СЂР ° Р · СЂР ° Р ± оток Рё тР° Рє РґР ° Р».

In “Рћ стР° тусе РЅР ° СѓРєРѕРіСЂР ° РґР ° Р РѕСЃСЃРёР№РЃСЃРєРѕР№ ФедеСРёР ° С † РёРёВ”, “In SЃRєRѕR№ R¤RμRґRμSЂR ° C † RoRoV "In" Rћ RїRμSЂRμRґR ° C ‡ Rμ RїSЂR PI ° ° RЅR RμRґRoRЅS <Rμ S,RμS ... RЅRѕR "RѕRіRoRoV" In "Rћ R¤RѕRЅRґRμ RїRμSЂSЃRїRμRєS,RoRІRЅS <C ... RoSЃSЃR" едовР° РЅРёР№Р ”, В“ РћР ± РёРЅРЅРѕРІР ° С † РёРѕРЅРЅРѕРј С † ентре «“ РЎРєРѕР ”РєРѕРІР РЅРґРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЂРЂРЅРЂРЂРЂРЂРЫР R ° СЏ Р ± Р ° Р · Р ° типР° В “Р“ Р “Р ° СЂР ° нтР° В” Р »РµРіРє ¾ RґR ° RμS, RμS ‰ Rμ 25-30 ° F · F RєRѕRЅRѕRІ. РќРѕ ведь Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅС ‹С “то тол СЊРєРѕ РїРѕР »РѕРІРёРЅР ° дел Р °.

P • With ‰ Rμ RμSЃS,SЊ S,R ° RєRoRμ RґRѕR "RіRѕRoRіSЂR ° SЋS ‰ RoRμ RїSЂRѕRіSЂR ° RјRјS <RєR ° Rє In" RљRѕRЅS RμRїS † † RoSЏ SЂRμS "RѕSЂRјRoSЂRѕRІR ° RЅRoSЏ SЂRѕSЃSЃRoR№SЃRєRѕR№ RЅR ° SѓRєRoV" In "RћSЃRЅRsRІS‹ RїRsR "RёС‚РёРєРё Р Р¤ РІ РѕР ± Р» Р ° сти SЂР ° Р · вития РЅР ° СѓРєРё Рё С‚РµС ... РЅРѕР »РѕРіРёРЃРЃРЃРЃРћРћРЃРЃРЃР °РЃРЃРЃРЃРЃР °РЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРЃРћРЃРЃћЃ ROSER'R ° RIR »RµRЅRёSЏ RIRSR» RёС‚РёРєРё R R¤ RІ РѕР ± Р »R ° сти СЂР ° Р · вития инновеллллллллее먨ллЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁЁ ‹Рµ РЅР ° РїСЂР ° РІР» ения СЂР ° Р · вития РЅР ° СѓРєРё, С‚РµС … РЅРѕР »РѕРіРёР№ Рё тех РЅРёРєРё РФ”, В “СтрР° тегия СЂР ° Р · вития РЅР ° СѓРєРё Рё РёРЅРЅРѕРІР ° Р ° Р †Р °Р °Р ° Р †Р ° Р °Р ° Р °Р °Р ° Р °Р ,Р ° Р °Р °Р °Р ° Р °Р °Р °Р ° Р †Р °Р °Р ° Р °Р °Р ° Р °Р °Р ° РІР ° Р In "RЎS,SЂR ° S,RμRіRoSЏ RoRЅRЅRѕRІR ° C † RoRѕRЅRЅRѕRіRѕ SЂR ° F · F RІRoS,RoSЏ R¤V" In "RЎS,SЂR ° S,RμRіRoSЏ RЅR ° SѓS ‡ RЅRѕ-S,RμS RЅRѕR ..." ‡ RѕRіRoS RμSЃRєRѕRіRѕ SЂR ° P · P RІRoS,RoSЏ R¤V "Ryo RјRЅRѕR¶RμSЃS,RІRѕ RІSЃRμRіRѕ S,R ° RєRѕRіRѕ PI RoSЃRїRѕR" RЅRμRЅRoRo SЂR ° R · R "Roes ‡ RЅS <C ... RІRμRґRѕRјSЃS,RІ.

Р • СЃР »Рё коротко: Р ± СѓРјР ° РіРё Р ± С‹ Р »Рѕ РёР · ведено РѕС З З РµРЅСЊ РјРЅРѕРіРѕ. РќР ° СЃРєРѕР »СЊРєРѕ это Р ± С‹ Р »Рѕ РЅР ° РїРѕР» СЊР · Сѓ РЅР ° СѓРєРµ РєР ° Рє тР° РєРѕРІРѕР№? Понятно, СЗ С‚Рѕ РІРѕРѕР ± С ‰ Рµ Р ± есполеР· РЅРѕ. РљСЂРѕРјРµ, РїСЂСЏРјРѕ СЃРєР ° жем, денег. РўРѕ есть если есть Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅ, то тем, кто РІРѕРІР ° РґР ° ет РІРѕРґ евоаЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂвЂЂЂЂжЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂЂвР° РЅРёРµ. R • СЃР »Рё нет - РёР · вините.

РЎРѕР ± ственно, именно потому Рё РІРѕСЏРІРёР »РёСЃСЊ десятки РЫРѕРґР …РРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРР Р Р Р Р - РРРРПРРРРР RS‚Рѕ РІСЃРєР ° РєРёРІР ° Р »Рё РІ воеР· Рґ те, кто С ... оть С З СѓС‚СЊ РѕС‚С ... РѕРґРёР» РѕС ‚С‚РµС ... РєРѕРЅР † † РєРѕС‚РѕСЂС ‹Рµ Р ± С‹ Р »Рё приняты РІ Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅРµ.

Рђ тР° Рє РєР ° Рє РЅР ° СѓРєР ° РІРѕРѕР ± С ‰ Рµ - “РІРµС ‰ СЊ РѕС ‡ ень СЃР” ожнР° СЏ, то Рё РІРѕР »СѓС ‡ РЃР ‹Р °РЊР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ° ... РѕРґРµ С З С‚Рѕ-то невероятно РіСЂРѕРјРѕР · РґРєРѕРµ. R — R ° C Р Rs SЃRєRsR Њ SЊRєRs R Ћ SЋRґRµР№ Р ± С ‹Р» Рё РѕР ± РµСЃРїРµС З РµРЅС ‹СЂР ° Р ± отой!

Р Р ° Р · СЂР ° Р ± Р ° С‚С ‹РІР ° Р» Рё, перерР° Р ± Р ° С‚С ‹РІР ° Р» Рё, РјР ° кетировР° Р »Рё, детР° Р »РёР · РёСЂРѕРІР ° Р» Рё, С „РѕСЂРјСѓР» РёСЂРѕРІР ° Р »РёвЂ¦ Р РІ итоге РІСЃРµ СЂР ° РІРЅРѕ РїРѕР» СѓС ‡ РёР РСРѕРЅР РРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРЅРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРЅРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРѕРЅРѕРѕРЅРѕРѕРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕРѕРЅРѕРЅРѕР РќРµС З С‚Рѕ РіСЂРѕРјРѕР · РґРєРѕРµ Рё непонятное РґР ° же СЂР ° Р · СЂР ° Р ± РѕС‚С ‡ РёРєР ° Рј.

Р Р ° скритиковР° ть С‚РµРєСЃС ‚Р» СЋР ± РсРіРѕ РґРµР№СЃС‚РІСѓСЋС ‰ его Р · Р ° кЂккккккккккккккккЀкЀкЀЀЀр , RμRјRЅS <R№ RїSЂR RІRѕRІRѕR№ ° F ° RєS,, RЅRμ SЃRїRѕSЃRѕR ± RЅS <R№ RѕR ± ‡ RμSЃRїRμS RoS,SЊ RїRѕSЃR "RμRґRѕRІR ° S,RμR" SЊRЅRѕRіRѕ C RμR † "‡ RѕSЃS,RЅRѕRіRѕ Ryo RЅRμRїSЂRѕS,RoRІRѕSЂRμS РёРІРѕРіРѕ РјРµС ... Р ° РЅРёР · РјР ° регулировР° РЅРёСЏ современной деятел СЊРЅРѕРЅРєРєР °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р °РЅР °Р °Р °Р °Р °РєРєРєР °РєР °Рє РќРѕ РІРѕРєР ° Р · Р ° ть пример того, РєР ° Рє РЅР ° РґРѕ, совсем РЅРµ просто.

P 'RЅR ° C € RμRј SЃR "SѓS P ‡ ° ° Rμ RЅR RїSЂRѕS,SЏR¶RμRЅRoRo RґRѕR" RіRѕRіRѕ RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRo SЃSЂR ° F · Sѓ S,SЂRo RЅR ° SѓS RЅS ‡ <° C ... RјRoRЅRoSЃS,SЂR RґSЂSѓRі P · P ° RґSЂSѓRіRѕRј RєSЂRoS,RoRєRѕRІR ° F "Ryo RґRμR№SЃS,RІSѓSЋS RoR№ ‰ P · ° F RєRѕRЅ Ryo RґRμRјRѕRЅSЃS,SЂRoSЂRѕRІR ° F" Ryo RЅR ° RјRμSЂRμRЅRoRμ PI SЃRєRѕSЂRѕRј RІSЂRμRјRμRЅRo P · ° F RІRμSЂS € RoS,SЊ-S,R ° RєRo SЂR ° F · SЂR ° F ± RѕS,RєSѓ RЅRѕRІRѕRіRѕ, RїRѕRєR ° F · C <RІR SЏ ° C S,Rѕ RμRіRѕ RєRѕRЅS ‡ † † RμRїS RoSЏ RoRј ° F ± F SЃRѕR "SЋS,RЅRѕ RїRѕRЅSЏS,RЅR °.

РћРґРЅР ° РєРѕ РІРѕР ·, кстР° ти, РІСЃРµ РµС ‰ Рµ тР° м… РЅР ° СЂР ° СЃСЃРјРѕС‚СЂРµРЅРёСЏС ... Рё РґРѕСЂР ° Р ± Р.

Министр Р ”. R ›РёРІР ° РЅРѕРІ СЃС ‡ итР° Р» СЃР ° РјС ‹Рј РІР ° жны Рј РІ Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅРµ СЃС „РѕСЂРјСѓР» Р№ РїСЂР ° РІРѕРІРѕР№ Р ° РєС ‚Рѕ РЅР ° СѓС З РЅРѕР№ деятел ьности Рё воддержЏмЍммммвЍЍввммвввР

Мииистр Рћ. Р'Р ° СЃРёР »СЊРµРІР ° СЃС ‡ итР° Р» Р ° своей Р · Р ° РґР ° Р ‡ ей СЃРѕР · РґР ° РЅРёРµ РѕС‚РєСЂС ‹С‚РѕР№, РєРЅРѕРј Рё С‚РµС ... РЅРѕР »РѕРіРёС ЗЗ РЅРѕР№ системы СѓРїСЂР ° РІР »РµРЅРёСЏ РЅР ° СѓРєРѕР№, РІРѕР · РІРІРєРєРІРІР ·РІР SЊ RoSЃSЃR "RμRґRѕRІR ° S,RμR" SЏRј, SЂR ° F · SЂR ° F ± ‡ RѕS,S RoRєR ° Rј, RїSЂRμRґRїSЂRoRЅRoRјR ° S,RμR "SЏRј, RѕSЂRіR ° RЅR ° Rј RІR" SЃS,Ro ° F.

Мииистр Рњ. Котюков СЃС ‡ итР° Р », С З С‚Рѕ РЅР ° РґРѕ сдел Р ° ть Р · Р ° РєРѕРЅ этР° РєРёРј системнР±РЉРјРјРјРјРјРјРјРјРј Ѕ РѕРј, РєРѕС‚РѕСЂС ‹Р№ РІСЃРµ-тР° РєРё РїРѕР · РІРѕР» РёС ‚РІС‹ СЂР ° Р ± отР° ть Рё утвеЀиРЕР ±РЅР …Р …Р …Р …Р …Р …Р …Р …Р …Р …Р …РЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅР RѕSЂRјS <RЅR ° SѓS ‡ RЅRѕ-S,RμS RЅRѕR ... "RѕRіRoS RμSЃRєRѕRіRѕ SЃRѕS,SЂSѓRґRЅRoS ‡ ‡ RμSЃS,RІR ° ± Ryo RѕR RμSЃRїRμS RμRЅRoSЏ RЅR ‡ ‡ ° SѓS RЅRѕ-S,RμS RЅRѕR ..." ‡ RѕRіRoS RμSЃRєRѕRіRѕ SЂR ° F · вития стрР° РЅС ‹.

Р'РѕРѕР ± С ‰ Рµ, РєРѕРЅРµС З РЅРѕ, РІСЃРµ РІС ‹РіР» СЏРґРёС ‚СЃРѕР» РёРґРЅРѕ Рё СѓРјРЅРѕ. РќРѕ есть РЅСЋР ° РЅСЃС ‹.

Р РёРјСЏ этим РЅСЋР ° РЅСЃР ° Рј - “это деньги. R ”еньги, которы Рµ РІС ‹РґРµР» яются РЅР ° РЅР ° СѓС З РЅСѓСЋ СЂР ° Р ± оту. R'RµRґSЊ сегодня РЅР ° СѓРєР ° РјРѕР¶РµС ‚С Р РёРЅР ° РЅСЃРёСЂРѕРІР ° ться РЅРµ толадР± СРЊР ±Р ± СРЊР ±Р ± С ±Р ±Р ±Р ± С ±Р ±Р ± С ±Р ±Р ±С ± ± РѕРіР ° С З Рµ, СЃРєРѕР »СЊРєРѕ РЅР ° дежнее, РЅРѕ Рё РЅР ° РїСЂСЏРјСѓСЋ РёР · реР° Р» R SЌS‚Рѕ РЅРѕСЂРјР ° Р »СЊРЅРѕ, РєРѕРіРґР ° РЅР ° СѓС З РЅС‹ Рµ SЂР ° Р · СЂР ° Р ± отки С Р · Р ° интересовР° РЅ, РЅРµ тР° Рє Р »Рё?

Р ”Р °, тР° Рј, РіРґРµ денег достР° С‚РѕС З РЅРѕ, РіРѕСЃСѓРґР ° рство РЅРµ РґРѕР» жно Р · Р ° Рј СЃР ° Сј ° С ‚РЅС‹ Рµ РёРЅРІРµСЃС‚РёС † РёРё Р ± СЋРґР¶РµР‚СЅРЅС ‹РјРё деньгР° РјРё. R "RѕSЃSѓRґR ° SЂSЃS,RІRѕ RґRѕR" R¶RЅRѕ RїSЂRoSЃSѓS,SЃS,RІRѕRІR ° S,SЊ S,R ° Rј, RіRґRμ P · ° F SЂRѕR¶RґR RμS,SЃSЏ RЅRѕRІRѕRμ ° F · ° RЅR RЅRoRμ, RіRґRμ RЅRμS, SЂS <RЅRєR ° RЅRμS Ryo, SЂRμSЃSѓSЂSЃRѕRІ RЅR S,Rѕ ° C ± ‡ S,RѕR C <RoRЅRІRμSЃS,RoSЂRѕRІR ° S,SЊ PI RoSЃSЃR "RμRґRѕRІR ° RЅRoSЏ Ryo SЂR ° F · SЂR ° F ± RѕS,RєRo.

P • СЃР »Рё же РёРЅР ° С З Рµ, то тР° РєРёРµ РІРµС ‰ Рё, РєР ° Рє откры тия РІ РѕР ± Р »Р ° сти РјР ° С‚ емР° тики, С „РёР · РёРєєРё, С ... РёРјРёРё РІРѕРѕР ± С ‰ Рµ РсстР° нутся Р · Р ° СЃС ‹R» Ryo.

P • SЃS,RμSЃS,RІRμRЅRЅRѕ, PI RѕS,S ‡ RμS,R ° C ... RїRμSЂRμRґ P "RѕSЃRґSѓRјRѕR№, RЎRѕRІRμS,RѕRј R¤RμRґRμSЂR ° C † RoRo Ryo RїSЂRμR · RoRґRμRЅS,RѕRј RІSЃRμ RґRѕRІRѕR" SЊRЅRѕ SЂR ° RґSѓR¶RЅRѕ . Р¦РёС „СЂС‹ РІРїРµС ‡ Р ° тляют Рё РІРЅСѓС € Р ° СЋС ‚оптимиР· Рј. Р 'стрР° РЅРµ Р ± РѕР »РµРµ 4 РѕСЂРіР ° РЅРёР · Р ° С † РёР№, Р · Р ° РЅРёРјР ° СЋС ‰ РёС ... СЃСЏ РёСЃСЃР» едовР° РЅРёР ° РЅРёРёР ° РЅРёР ° РЅР °Р ° РЅР °Р ° РЅР °Р ° РЅР °Р ° РЅР ±Р ° РЅР °Р ° РЅР °Р ° РЅР ±Р ° РЅР ±Р ° РЅР ±Р ° РЅР ° Р ±Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ±Р ° РЅР ±Р ° РЅР ±Р ° РЅР ±Р ° Р ±Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° Р ±Р ° откР° РјРё. R егистрируется СЃРІС ‹С € Рµ 000 25 РїР ° тентов РІ РіРѕРґ, это РІРѕСЃСЊРјРѕРµ место РІ. RќR RіRѕSЃSѓRґR ° ° ° SЂSЃS,RІRμRЅRЅSѓSЋ RїSЂRѕRіSЂR RјRјSѓ RЅR ° SѓS RЅRѕ-S,RμS ‡ ... ‡ RЅRoS RμSЃRєRѕRіRѕ SЂR ° F ± F · RІRoS,RoSЏ SѓRґRμS, RїRѕS,SЂR ° C ‡ RμRЅRѕ 000 RјRoR "P" Röhr ° SЂRґRѕRІ SЂSѓR ± P »PµP№.

РќСѓ Рё РІСЃРµ РІ тР° РєРѕРј РґСѓС ... Рµ.

P • сть, РєРѕРЅРµС ‡ РЅРѕ, РјРёРЅСѓСЃС ‹.

РЎРµС‚СѓСЋС ‚РІ РґРѕРєР» Р ° РґР ° С ..., С З С‚Рѕ РґРѕР »СЏ Р ± РёР · несР° РІ СЂР ° Р · СЂР ° Р ± откР° С…, РєР ° Рє РёСЃС ‡ РЅРёРєР ° С „РёРЅР ° РЅСЃРёСЂРѕРІР ° РЅРёСЏ, всего 28,1%, РІ то время РєР ° Рє РІ РЎРЁРђ этР° С † РёС“ 61,4 ° С%. РљРѕРЅРµС З РЅРѕ, РґР °, жР° Р »СЊ, СЗ С‚Рѕ РЅР ° С € Р ± РёР · нес РЅРµ идет СЂСѓРєР ° РѕР ± РЂРѕР °СРєСРєРєСРєР °СРєР °СРєР °СРѓРѓСРєРѓСРє -Р ± енР· РѕРєРѕР »РѕРЅРєРµ это Рё РЅРµ РѕР ± СЏР · Р ° тел СЊРЅРѕ, РІРїСЂРѕС З РµРј.

P • сть РµС ‰ Рµ РѕРґРЅР ° С † РёС „СЂР °. R'SЃРµРіРѕ 13 РІСѓР · РѕРІ РёР · 203 РїСЂРѕРІРµСЂРµРЅРЅС ‹С ... (6,4%) имел Рё РІ 2016 РІРѕРѕСѓ РґРѕС ... интелл ектуР° Р »СЊРЅРѕР№ деятел ьности. РўРѕ есть РѕС ‚РїСЂРѕРґР ° Р¶ СЃРІРѕРёС ... РёСЃСЃР» едовР° РЅРёР№. Рђ РЅР ° РёР ± РѕР »СЊС € РёР№ РѕР ± ъем РїСЂРѕРґР ° Р¶ состР° РІРёР» всего 2,9% РсС ‚РІСЃРµС ... РґРѕС ... РІРґРѕ.

Р РІРѕС ‚тут РЅР ° С З З РёРЅР ° РµС € СЊ Р · Р ° РґСѓРјС ‹РИР ° ться: Р ° РїРѕС ЗЗµµРјСѓ тР° Рє? РџРѕС З З РµРјСѓ Сѓ РЅР ° СЃ трР° тятся деньги, Р ° РїСЂРёР ± С ‹Р

РќРµС ‚, РјС‹ СЃРµР№С ‡ Р ° СЃ РЅРµ стР° нем говорить Рс In РЎРєРѕР РЅС ‹РІРѕРґ РєРѕСЂРјР» ение ЧуР± Р ° Р№СЃР ° Рё ждР° ть РѕС ‚РЅРёС ... РєР ° РєРѕРіРѕ-то РІСЂРѕСЂС‹ РИРІРІРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРРІР ¶РёС‚ельны С ... реР· СѓР »СЊС‚Р ° тов тР° Рє же Р ± еспол еР· РЅРѕ, РєР ° Рє Рё того, С З С‚Рѕ Р §СѓР ± Р ° Р№СЃР ° РІС ‹СЃС‚Р ° РІСЏС‚ РЅР ° РєРѕРЅРµС † РёР · стрР° РЅС ‹.

РќРµ Р · Р ° тем, РєР ° Рє говорится, РІ Р »РµСЃСѓ СЏРіРѕРґРєР ° Р · рел Р °.

RњS <RІRѕR SЊRјRμRј · P ± RѕR "RμRμ SЃRμSЂSЊRμR · RЅS <R№ SЃSЂRμR · ° F RoRјRμRЅRЅRѕ RїSѓR ± P" RoRєR ° C † RoRo PI RѕRґRЅRѕRј Röhr · RіRѕSЃSѓRґR ° SЂSЃS,RІRμRЅRЅS <C ... RЎRњR. Р'РѕР · можно, СЗ С‚Рѕ РІРѕРґР ± РѕСЂРєР ° Рё РЅРµ совсем, СЃРєР ° жем, РсР ± ъективнР°, РЅР €РѕРЅР ° С

РЎРІРµСЂС ... тяжелы Рµ СЌР »РµРјРµРЅС‚С‹. RS Р Rs R ± S ‹R ј RјR ° C Р RµSÖRöR ° R Р Rs S Р RsRј, S ‡ S Р Rs S„ RöR · RöRєєrћ RћR RЇR R І Rѓ SѓR ± RЅRµ R РRsR ѓ SѓS ‡ RöR »Ryo 6 RЅR ° РёР ± РѕР »РµРµ тяжел С ‹С ... С ... РёРјРёС З РµСЃРєРёС ... СЌР» ементов СЃ номерР° РјРё 113-118. 2 RёR · РЅРёС ... Р ± С ‹Р» Рё РїСЂРёР · РЅР ° РЅС ‹Р ЮПАК Рё уже РИРѕР» СѓС З РёР »Рё СЃРѕР ± ственны Рµ имимимимимимимимиРеровий, 114 †”Р» иверморий. ОстР° Р »СЊРЅС‹ Рµ СЌР »РµРјРµРЅС‚С‹ РїРѕРєР ° СЂР ° СЃСЃРјР ° тривР° ются комитетом.

Что РєР ° СЃР ° ется Р »РёРІРµСЂРјРѕСЂРёСЏ Рё С“ Р ”еровия -“ РІ РІСЂРёСЂРѕРґРµ РЅРµС °С …Р… »СЊРєРѕ синтеР· РѕРј, РїСЂР ° РєС‚РёС З РµСЃРєР ° СЏ С † енность РЅСѓР» евР° СЏ.

РРєР · Р ° РІР ° С‚С‚РЅС ‹Рµ Р» Р ° Р · РµСЂС ‹. РњС ‹РІРёСЃР ° Р» Рё РѕР ± этой жуткой устР° РЅРѕРІРєРµ PEARL РІ Нижнем РќРѕРІРІРСР ·РІР °Р °РІР °РІРЂРІРЂРІР СЊ СЃР ° РјРѕРµ РјРѕС ‰ РЅРѕРµ световое РёР · Р »СѓС З РµРЅРёРµ РІ РјРёСЂРµ. R РІ С † елом СЃРЅРѕРІР ° ее РїРѕР» еР· ность РїРѕРґ сомнением. R ”Р °, устР° РЅРѕРІРєСѓ можно РёСЃРїРѕР» СЊР · РѕРІР ° ть РґР »СЏ Р · Р ° РІСѓСЃРєР ° термоядеСРЅРСРЕРР… · РѕРІР ° ть РґР »СЏ СЃРѕР · РґР ° РЅРёСЏ Р» Р ° Р · РµСЂРЅС ‹С ... РёСЃС‚РѕС З РЅРёРєРѕРІ нейтровиввРРРІР ±РІР ±РІР ±РІР ±РІРІР »РµР · ности РїРѕРєР ° РІ С † ел РѕРј РѕС‚РєСЂС ‹С‚.

Heavy duty fields of Sarov. In the famous city of Sarov, scientists have developed a method for producing heavy-duty magnetic fields. Using magneto-cumulative explosive generators, where the wave from the explosion “compresses” the field, it was possible to obtain fields of 28 MG. Such a value is a record of artificial magnetic fields, it is 100 million times more than the strength of the Earth’s field.

Such fields, as stated in the source, can be used in studies of the behavior of substances in various extreme conditions.

I will not ask the question "why."

Grigory Perelman, a Russian mathematician, proved the Poincare hypothesis, which is included in the list of 7 "Millennium Problems", which was made up of the Clay Mathematical Institute. The hypothesis has existed since 1904, and Perelman not only proved the hypothesis, he also refused a million dollars in prize money.

Given that the task was completely mathematical, in vain he did not take a million.

Scientists at the Russian University of Gas and Oil, after conducting a number of studies, argue that hydrocarbons can be created not as a result of decomposition of organic substances, as is commonly believed, but in a non-biological way. It was found that the upper layer of the mantle at a depth of 150 kilometers has all the conditions for the formation of complex hydrocarbon systems.

Is it helpful? Maybe.

Russian scientists made a great geographical discovery - discovered an ice-cold lake located in Antarctica. Together with colleagues from Britain, in 1996 they found it using seismic sensing and observations from radars. In 2012, polar explorers first entered this lake, isolated from the world for about a million years. Samples of its water are likely to lead to the discovery of completely unique organisms, and also allow some conclusions to be drawn about the existence of life outside the Earth - for example, on the satellite of Jupiter Europe.

Conclusions are good. So is life in Europe. But it would be better to send a probe there, which these theories would either confirm or refute.

In general, the list goes on and on, but it’s not worth it. Just because you are increasingly wondering: why all this? Where is the real benefit?

Of course, one cannot approach everything from this point of view. Not everything should be profitable, there should be some action for the prestige of the country.

But why then is world science so active in the field of medicine and healthcare? And have we been buying exclusively imported compounds for a long time and just packing tablets from them? We buy (if they sell) imported equipment, because we ourselves are not able to produce it, and so on.

We are developing theories about life in Europe, but are not able to send a probe there. We tell tales of flights to the moon, but are not able to build an orbital station. And you can still recall completely non-scientific engines for large-capacity ships. Not scientifically, but very topical.

What does all our science do? Is the development of tablets akin to the beginning of the century and all the Skolkovo “miracles”?

But everything is in accordance with the law. It is not clear for whom it is written, but written.

In the Soviet Union, science was, despite the fact that there was no law on it. But there were Salutes, flights to the Moon, Venus, Mars. There were developments that we use today, posing as Russian.

There was no science law in the history of the Russian Empire. Nevertheless, Lomonosov, Tsiolkovsky, Mozhaisk, Sikorsky and thousands of others worked for the good of the country. And their achievements were very tangible and tangible.

Probably, after all, it is not a matter of the quantity and quality of the regulators of science in the form of over and by-laws, laws, regulations and decrees, which the legislators stamp with frank pleasure. The thing is that science should be a science, and not one of the ways to absorb budget money.

Happy Russian Science Day!
Author:
Photos used:
kremlin.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Grandfather 8 February 2020 05: 11 New
    • 26
    • 12
    +14
    Russian science, apparently only works on the military-industrial complex, shopping mall. I, as a layman, do not see the exhaust from it, at all, at the household level, we live off of China, from a fountain pen to a computer. Chinese pots, a Chinese doorbell, Chinese toothbrushes, etc. ... the economy with a “pipe” is not interesting in everyday life, they said “effective managers” - we’ll buy everything! (and buy ... until one day, what the hell are they sending. -What then?). Happy Science Day.
    1. Ugolek 8 February 2020 05: 41 New
      • 15
      • 5
      +10
      The author’s entire large article can be put in one short phrase - in the Russian Federation there is no applied science in a sufficiently developed form. And this is very bad. Applied science is primarily private money for specific research to solve narrow, specific problems. The output should be profit. But in Russia there are Skolkovo and Rusnano, but it is not known how much they invested in and how much they earned money.
      1. Tatyana 8 February 2020 07: 30 New
        • 23
        • 3
        +20
        Skolkovo and Rusnano, these are structures created under FEEDING of Chubais

        That's really about the scientist Chubais - this is laughter and sin!
        Truly the Holy Truth of the author!
        I really liked this statement by the author! Good shameless redhead picked up!
        1. Tatyana 8 February 2020 07: 51 New
          • 13
          • 2
          +11
          Probably, after all, it is not a matter of the quantity and quality of the regulators of science in the form of over and by-laws, laws, regulations and decrees, which the legislators stamp with frank pleasure. The thing is that science should be a science, and not one of the ways to absorb budget money.

          Yeah sure! How many scholars have divorced next to scientists according to the law adopted by the bureaucratic bureaucrats, hang out and nourish themselves - do they break money off scientists into their pockets ?! And you won’t count!

          Scientists themselves with a holiday!

          REFERENCE
          Shushera - Worthless, insignificant people, rabble.
          1. Stas157 8 February 2020 09: 15 New
            • 14
            • 6
            +8
            Science is distinguished little, and on Skolkovo and Chubais - a lot. This is our state policy.

            Remember at Red: - "We have a lot of money. There is a lot of them!".

            Why does Putin give money to Chubais? And why, instead of science, spends state money on dubious projects (Rusnano and Skolkovo)?
            Because he is the king - does what he wants.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. The comment was deleted.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                    3. ser56 8 February 2020 16: 47 New
                      • 3
                      • 2
                      +1
                      Quote: Golovan Jack
                      and in the army - order

                      sure? wink
                      Quote: Golovan Jack
                      proves nothing.

                      from what? the Soviet generation will leave, talented young people are not particularly eager or go to the West ...
      2. Commandant 8 February 2020 08: 10 New
        • 8
        • 4
        +4
        Quote: Tatiana
        Skolkovo and Rusnano, these are structures created under FEEDING of Chubais

        That's really about the scientist Chubais - this is laughter and sin!
        Truly the Holy Truth of the author!
        I really liked this statement by the author! Good shameless redhead picked up!

        Thank God this redhead-masson was not allowed into the military-industrial complex .. Although his tentacles are felt there and those who stand behind him ..
        So far, such chubais in our science, etc. they rule .. We will stagnate
        1. AK1972 8 February 2020 11: 21 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Quote: Commandant
          Thank god this redhead masson was not allowed into the military-industrial complex

          His red tentacles are currently reaching for retirement savings. He said that pension money should work for the economy, though he didn’t specify “it’s done for the economy.” And they will reach out, and one does not have to be an academician to guess where this money will go. At one time, EBN to the question: where did the money of the pension fund go? replied: "And who knows where they went ?!"
          1. Commandant 8 February 2020 12: 19 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Quote: AK1972
            His red tentacles are currently reaching for retirement savings. He said that pension money should work for the economy.

            Well, everything is more cynical here .. It’s just to kill those who were born in the USSR and can compare and analyze.
            They are now being reintroduced into the souls of our children and grandchildren .. Naive bourgeoisie !!!
            Russian souls you do not understand and do not win! ..even if we accept our ROC into Catholics .. angry
            We have in our hearts, something that you never dreamed of ..
      3. tihonmarine 8 February 2020 11: 27 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Tatiana
        That's really about the scientist Chubais - this is laughter and sin!

        Well, if Chubais is a scientist, then we are all on the academicians site. But “Skolkovo” was assigned to Dmitry Medvedev, but not Chubais, to that “Nano”, as they say, “Each sister has a comb.”
      4. 1959ain 8 February 2020 12: 04 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Tatiana
        That's really about the scientist Chubais - this is laughter and sin!
        Truly the Holy Truth of the author!
        I really liked this statement by the author! Good red-shameless picked up!

        He was somewhere Zavlab, and at the same time he was selling flowers, and somewhere else the infa slipped. This continuity, flesh from the flesh of Ulyukaev from that team of reformers, is illustrated by a 1991 photograph taken in Austria. The main figures of the “renovationists” of Russia lined up on it: the Minister of Labor (and later the Minister of Economics) Alexander Shokhin, Minister of Foreign Economic Relations Petr Aven, First Deputy Minister of Economics and Finance Andrei Nechaev, followed by Ulyukaev, then Anatoly Chubais, another the hero of market transformations, Sergey Glazyev, who was then the first deputy minister of foreign economic relations, closes the line. High-ranking Democrats were in Austria under the International Visitor Leadership Program (IVLP), organized by the State Department USA. In other words, Ulyukaev, Chubais, Gaidar and others were carefully prepared for the changes of the 90s under the watchful supervision of Washington. Http://bloknot.ru/e-konomika/popavshijsya-na-vzyatke-ulyukaev-v-1991-godu-prohodil- stazhirovku-v-avstrii-po-programme-gosdepa-ssha-503774.html
    2. Nick 8 February 2020 08: 11 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Ugolek
      The author’s entire large article can be put in one short phrase - in the Russian Federation there is no applied science in a sufficiently developed form. And this is very bad. Applied science is primarily private money for specific research to solve narrow, specific problems. The output should be profit. But in Russia there are Skolkovo and Rusnano, but it is not known how much they invested in and how much they earned money.

    3. Victor N 8 February 2020 09: 08 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Well, after all, toys also have no practical use, and sometimes it’s impossible to go home. Because incomes allow .... To manage something, you need to formulate a goal. And this can only be done by the scientists themselves, the state can only declare desires. Want is not harmful....
    4. ser56 8 February 2020 16: 44 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Ugolek
      in the Russian Federation there is no applied science in a sufficiently developed form.

      the question is why? I will answer - there are no conditions for the implementation of the results of science in life ... Research can only be done from profit request , and if the research or implementation is unsuccessful, then the prosecutor’s office will come to you ...
      Stupid question - are you ready to introduce a new one or is it better to buy? repeat
  2. DMB 75 8 February 2020 05: 47 New
    • 17
    • 8
    +9
    Quote: Dead Day
    at the household level, we live off of China, from a fountain pen to a computer.

    The whole world lives like this ...
    Quote: Dead Day
    until one day, nafig send.

    They will not send, they need us just as much as we need them.
    Happy Science Day.
    1. Grandfather 8 February 2020 06: 06 New
      • 12
      • 15
      -3
      Quote: DMB 75

      The whole world lives like this ...

      yah ? and china? and japan? and more countries?
      Quote: DMB 75
      They will not send, they need us just as much as we need them.

      as long as needed.
      1. Boris55 8 February 2020 08: 09 New
        • 4
        • 4
        0
        Quote: Dead Day
        as long as needed.

        In the current economy, everyone needs markets.

        Look what the West is doing with Ukraine, the Baltic states - it destroys all production. For what? - that would buy their goods. Look how their manufacturers howl because of sanctions against Russia, how Belarus uses it.

        ps
        The modern Chinese hinterland still lives in the century before last.

        1. tihonmarine 8 February 2020 11: 17 New
          • 0
          • 4
          -4
          Quote: Boris55
          Look what the West is doing with Ukraine, the Baltic states - it destroys all production.

          Well, in the Baltic States and the USSR, there wasn’t a particularly big industry. So they have suffered little from this.
          1. ser56 8 February 2020 16: 59 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: tihonmarine
            Well, in the Baltic States and the USSR, there wasn’t a particularly big industry. So they have suffered little from this.

            Seriously? bully Take Riga - there were the auto giant RAF, the radio giant VEF (in 1991 - 20 employees), the Riga Carriage Works ... and where are they? or dzintars?
      2. Victor N 8 February 2020 09: 25 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        If you ever manage to talk with a researcher (who never calls himself a "scientist") - be surprised. But this is unlikely: a misunderstanding encourages researchers to avoid contact with outsiders.
    2. 210ox 8 February 2020 06: 45 New
      • 7
      • 5
      +2
      Yeah. Only the whole world, well, or almost the whole, looked into the mouth of RI and then the USSR. Not now. Caught in the margins, like science.
  3. Svarog 8 February 2020 05: 50 New
    • 21
    • 9
    +12
    Is the state interested in the development of science? In the USSR, the state’s interest was obvious, one could often hear “catch up and overtake” .. And now, in my opinion, they are not trying to catch up with anyone, let alone overtake.
    Without a state, science, industry ... in general, all major major projects, especially those with a payback period of maybe .. or maybe not, will not develop anything by itself .. And our state is trying to distance itself from all problems. .mall themselves all ..
    1. _Sergei_ 8 February 2020 06: 41 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      I remember the Soviet era. Weeding summer and hilling the crop of the sponsored collective farm, harvesting in the fall, help the production workers in the winter to fulfill the plan, and then help the meat factory (they always lacked workers). And then catch up on non-fulfillment of modernization of some node and jambs in technology.
      1. Nick 8 February 2020 08: 20 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        Quote: _Sergey_
        I remember the Soviet era. Weeding summer and hilling the crop of the sponsored collective farm, harvesting in the fall, help the production workers in the winter to fulfill the plan, and then help the meat factory (they always lacked workers). And then catch up on non-fulfillment of modernization of some node and jambs in technology.

        That's for sure! Such an attitude to the scientific community was in the late USSR.
      2. Yuri Simple 8 February 2020 10: 50 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        I remember the Soviet era. Summer weeding and hilling of the patronized collective farm, in autumn harvesting, in winter help for the production workers to implement the plan, and then help the meat factory (they always did not have enough workers) .- You do not remember it well, fragmentarily. What you described really had a place to be. But you did not think out. Either they were scared, or they couldn’t. Did not occur to the idea that all this was done on purpose? Wasn't it possible to design weeding machines? Etc. The only thing to include in the plan and to finance. But for some reason they didn’t include it, didn’t finance it. Instead, they sent those who could do it weeding, cleaning, lifting, loading, etc. By thoughtlessness? Or what would they, God forbid, construct? Believes it is really impossible to make a lift for the village? Instead of a loader. Is it really impossible to make a potato harvester such as a harvester? They didn’t even order it. And those that released - the level of the 30s.
        Already then, paved the way for "effective managers." The first computer bought back in the 80s. Primitive. I was surprised to learn a year later that I have more power than it costs on Salute-7. And you say ... There were a lot of shortcomings and wretches in the USSR. Because of this, he died. Only today it’s even worse. And so the death will be worse. This time it will not do. The people are not so naive.
        1. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 02 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Quote: Yuri Simple
          that it’s more powerful with me than it is on Salute-7. And you say

          no need to show ignorance and compare staff with the control computer ... bully
        2. CT-55_11-9009 10 February 2020 14: 49 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Yuri Simple
          Did not occur to the idea that all this was done on purpose?

          Well then. Labor education is a great thing. Today’s Internet-students would be soooooooo useful. Seriously. And then, firstly, many people only hold the mouse with their hands and hammer on the clave, and secondly, they do not know how to answer for words, therefore they are not childishly greyhound.

          Quote: Yuri Simple
          The first computer bought back in the 80s. Primitive. I was surprised to learn a year later that it’s more powerful with me than it is on Salyut-7

          I will say this. Modern computers in orbit are still made on the basis of ... Oh, I would not lie ... 486go, or something processor. And this is enough - wildly complex calculations are not needed, for which a spercomputer is needed. In addition, reliability is valued in space, and they are worked out perfectly. And this is also in the USA, by the way.
      3. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 01 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: _Sergey_
        autumn harvest

        it’s good in the k / f garage shown ... bully
  4. Ilya-spb 8 February 2020 06: 20 New
    • 21
    • 0
    +21
    Happy Holidays!

    I'm a scientist. And I see science from the inside. And I see the education system in universities and the decision-making system.

    Pros:

    1) We have many talents. Both young and adult.

    2) We are updating the material and technical base. The state is actually financing the acquisition of devices.

    3) There are a lot of growth points - both in chemistry and in biotechnology. We are not far behind forever.

    Cons:

    1) The gap between academic science, education and implementation (commercialization).
    Many applied (not fundamental) developments are made by scientists "for show", and not for sale, not for business needs. Often, Russian science is not ready to satisfy even for money the needs of commercial companies

    2) We have not developed a culture of international patenting and attracting investment.

    3) The brain drain continues. One of the obstacles is that there is no way young and decisive in our country. It's hard for a young scientist to break through. In departments and laboratories, much has been captured by "respected scientists" who sit in leadership positions.

    4) we do not have an administration for scientists, but scientists for the administration. In the West, the scientist does not fight with accounting, for the opportunity to buy the necessary reagents, and with funding, he quickly receives an order and works.

    5) About the decision-making system for grants, I ... keep silent))). Although there are improvements.

    6) We have a poorly developed culture of foreign publications of scientific results. There is an objective reason: in many scientific areas there are different methodological approaches in our country and abroad. For example, experiments on animals in the West require strict adherence to bioethics when growing and killing an object (from mice and rats and above).

    7) And, finally, global: in the last five years, we have begun to measure the effectiveness of applied science not with patents and volumes of implementation, but with publications in international publications. This is complete nonsense.

    But I believe in improving the situation.

    Happy Holidays!
    1. Vita vko 8 February 2020 08: 20 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Everyone agrees that the Russian scientific school is unique, its traditions must be preserved and expanded. And in order for science to be a science, and not one of the ways to absorb budget money, it is necessary to clearly establish the moral and ethical standards of its development. In this regard, the fears of officials and "effective managers" from science on attempts to adopt the Law on Science, become clear. he puts the framework allowed for the financial support of "his", their behavior in relation to both ordinary scientists and the development of talented youth.
    2. Sergey79 8 February 2020 09: 20 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      I agree with a colleague. The truths there will be more truths ....
    3. Victor N 8 February 2020 09: 37 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      There is practically no science left in universities - the exorbitant loads on teachers do not leave time for research. Therefore, it is wrong to equate educational institutions with research. It is also wrong to equate teachers with researchers, even in ranks: a senior researcher is not an assistant professor, professor.
      Happy holiday, colleagues!
    4. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 08 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      The state is actually financing the acquisition of devices.

      Seriously? and what did you buy last year? was enough for an oscilloscope with a band of 500 MHz? repeat
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      We have a poorly developed culture of foreign publications of scientific results.

      and what is the problem - write and publish in Q1 bully in my opinion, one - few good translators ...
      Quote: Ilya-spb
      This is complete nonsense.

      from what? patents are a crafty thing, with a little writing skill no problem bully any volume of rollout will be written, but publishing in a good journal is not possible without good results ... request
  5. Gardamir 8 February 2020 06: 43 New
    • 13
    • 6
    +7
    It's funny All the time I compare how we live and what the USSR breakers called on us to do. They said we’ll break the Union and high-quality pots will appear in the country. Neither Soviet power nor pots. But in power there are "cossacks" who do not care about the people.
    1. Golovan Jack 8 February 2020 09: 53 New
      • 4
      • 9
      -5
      Quote: Gardamir
      Neither Soviet power nor pots

      What side is this to the topic of the article? Flood is prohibited, "Gardamir" stop
  6. Commandant 8 February 2020 08: 22 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Quote: Dead Day
    we live off China, from a fountain pen to a computer. Chinese pots, Chinese doorbell, Chinese toothbrushes, etc.

    So who taught all this to the Chinese and delivered them the technology?
    Comrade Stalin ! And the Chinese respected him very much, as did Mao ..
    By the way, the rise of the economy and power of China began precisely with the collapse of the USSR .. And especially when they rolled out their neoliberals in tanks on the square .. hi
    1. AU Ivanov. 8 February 2020 10: 31 New
      • 0
      • 8
      -8
      In the field of microelectronics and computer technology, the Chinese Union could not teach anything. Sami in these topics lagged behind the developed states.
      1. Commandant 8 February 2020 11: 33 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: AU Ivanov.
        In the field of microelectronics and computer technology, the Chinese Union could not teach anything. Sami in these topics lagged behind the developed states.

        Well, it's hard to argue on this issue ..SSSR did not like advertising, etc.
        Just remember our “Buran” is actually a space UAV robot even at that time .. It’s actually already built airfields in Africa, etc.
        He was ready to go into a series .. There the whole country worked on this project and such developments were a breakthrough in all areas ..
        But the humpback and EBN ruined everything ..

        It was the highest level of our engineering in the Soviet Union. hi BECAUSE STARTED !!!
        This project was like a statement by Gaddafi to switch to payment for oil in national currency, etc.
        1. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 10 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Quote: Commandant
          He was ready to go in a series

          and what to bring into orbit? repeat
          1. AU Ivanov. 8 February 2020 20: 49 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            And most importantly - how much.
  7. Golovan Jack 8 February 2020 09: 31 New
    • 5
    • 9
    -4
    Quote: Dead Day
    Russian science, apparently only works on the military-industrial complex ... we live off China, from a fountain pen to a computer. Chinese pots, Chinese doorbell, Chinese toothbrushes, etc ...

    Science is not related to “pots, doorbells and toothbrushes”, from the word “completely”.

    Quote: Dead Day
    I'm like a layman

    Why - how? You are it, classic laughing
  8. iouris 8 February 2020 13: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Dead Day
    at the household level, we live off China, from a fountain pen to a computer

    And we will live off China, while we live in a small country with a small market size and low purchasing power. In order for production to become cost-effective and product quality high, it must be massive. According to different estimates, the country needs to increase the population to 250 ... 300 million (note that approximately the same would be in the USSR if it had been preserved). There is no market. Hence the stagnation of the nation. The population without work runs wild and does not breed. And in the absence of a market and production, who needs science here? At least some law accept.
    1. AU Ivanov. 8 February 2020 20: 52 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      There is an external market. But to get there, you need to try very hard.
  9. ser56 8 February 2020 16: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Dead Day
    I'm like a layman, I don’t see the exhaust from her, completely

    So, an example - nuclear power plants with our own fuel cycle - 20% of the energy of the Russian Federation request
    another - who invented the laser remember? hi
  • acetophenon 8 February 2020 05: 25 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Science is not when it is useful. And when it's interesting to dig deeper. Preferably - at the expense of the state or some sponsors.
    1. Ross xnumx 8 February 2020 06: 18 New
      • 5
      • 4
      +1
      Quote: acetophenon
      Science is not when it is useful. And when it's interesting to dig deeper. Preferably - at the expense of the state or some sponsors.

      It was necessary to:
      Modern Russian science (mainly) is not when it is useful. And when it's interesting to dig deeper. Preferably - at the expense of the state or some sponsors.
      good
    2. Victor N 8 February 2020 09: 49 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      “Poking around” is for starters, for young people. Further, it is more difficult and more difficult: you determine the goal yourself, evaluate the result yourself, punish yourself .... And everything is under the close supervision of fellow competitors .... You can leave work at the machine, at the foundation pit, and the scientific “strap” is always with you .
    3. Boris55 8 February 2020 11: 13 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: acetophenon
      Science is not when it is useful. And when it's interesting to dig deeper.

      One such "picker" picked up an entire atomic bomb, and then repented ...

    4. iouris 8 February 2020 15: 19 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      In fact, you are interested in household production technologies. Science is a new technology. Our dependence on the West is due to our technological backwardness. Our technological backwardness is explained by the state of our science. Governance (in the broad sense) is also a technology.
  • Amateur 8 February 2020 05: 43 New
    • 12
    • 9
    +3
    Что РєР ° СЃР ° ется Р »РёРІРµСЂРјРѕСЂРёСЏ Рё С“ Р ”еровия -“ РІ РІСЂРёСЂРѕРґРµ РЅРµС °С …Р… »СЊРєРѕ синтеР· РѕРј, РїСЂР ° РєС‚РёС З РµСЃРєР ° СЏ С † енность РЅСѓР» евР° СЏ.
    РРєР · Р ° РІР ° С‚С‚РЅС ‹Рµ Р» Р ° Р · РµСЂС ‹. РњС ‹РІРёСЃР ° Р» Рё РѕР ± этой жуткой устР° РЅРѕРІРєРµ PEARL РІ Нижнем РќРѕРІРІРСР ·РІР °Р °РІР °РІРЂРІРЂРІР СЊ СЃР ° РјРѕРµ РјРѕС ‰ РЅРѕРµ световое РёР · Р »СѓС З РµРЅРёРµ РІ РјРёСЂРµ. R РІ С † елом СЃРЅРѕРІР ° ее РїРѕР» еР· ность РїРѕРґ сомнением. R ”Р °, устР° РЅРѕРІРєСѓ можно РёСЃРїРѕР» СЊР · РѕРІР ° ть РґР »СЏ Р · Р ° РІСѓСЃРєР ° термоядеСРЅРСРЕРР… · РѕРІР ° ть РґР »СЏ СЃРѕР · РґР ° РЅРёСЏ Р» Р ° Р · РµСЂРЅС ‹С ... РёСЃС‚РѕС З РЅРёРєРѕРІ нейтровиввРРРІР ±РІР ±РІР ±РІР ±РІРІР »РµР · ности РїРѕРєР ° РІ С † ел РѕРј РѕС‚РєСЂС ‹С‚.

    It is interesting, and who, by education, Mr. Skomorokhov, would so immediately “brand the uselessness” of these scientific discoveries?
    And in general, how can science be managed?
    Muse visited me today, -
    She sat a little and left!
    .
    .
    I rush about like a beast in the house,
    But God bless her, with Muse - I forgave her.
    She went to someone else:
    Apparently, I treated her badly. (V. Vysotsky)

    This, after all, can be said about science.
    Or as in “The Munchausen himself”: “This means that from 8 to 10 in the morning he has planned a feat.”
    Or Soviet social obligations: within 2 quarters to make 2 scientific discoveries in excess of the plan. Funny and stupid at the same time.
    1. Vladimir_2U 8 February 2020 06: 10 New
      • 8
      • 4
      +4
      Quote: Amateur
      It is interesting, and who, by education, Mr. Skomorokhov, would so immediately “brand the uselessness” of these scientific discoveries?
      It is not known who he is by education, but he’s quite capable of “sarcasm”.
      1. Golovan Jack 8 February 2020 09: 54 New
        • 4
        • 5
        -1
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        "in sarcasm" he is quite able

        I note - on any theme.
    2. Mordvin 3 8 February 2020 06: 11 New
      • 10
      • 7
      +3
      Quote: Amateur
      Or Soviet social obligations: within 2 quarters to make 2 scientific discoveries in excess of the plan. Funny and stupid at the same time.

      You better remember the very recent time when the president of the Russian Academy of Sciences could not answer Putin questions why the academy of sciences was giving out titles to officials.
      This year, for example, Alexander Savenkov, Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, Vasily Khristoforov, head of the registration and archival funds department of the FSB of the Russian Federation, and academician - deputy education minister Alexei Lopatin, became the corresponding members of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

      https://www.mk.ru/politics/2016/11/23/putin-ustroil-zhutkiy-raznos-glave-ran-za-chinovnikov-stavshikh-akademikami.html
      What will these “academics" invent?
      1. Svarog 8 February 2020 06: 26 New
        • 13
        • 6
        +7
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        What will these “academics" invent?

        Scooter for 10 thousand dollars .. for example, a smartphone ... Chubais presented it .. though it never came to life, but it was sawn nicely ..
        1. Mordvin 3 8 February 2020 06: 32 New
          • 7
          • 4
          +3
          Quote: Svarog
          Scooter for 10 thousand dollars ..

          No doubt... laughing

          These scientists even got Putin.
    3. Nikolaevich I 8 February 2020 07: 26 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      There is applied science and there is fundamental ... Fundamental science is engaged in the "discovery of weight", which do not give practical returns either now or in the near future ... moreover, there are fundamental discoveries made 100 years or more, but still not giving "neither drink nor eat"! But what a "zyuzyuk" (!) ... countries that "waved a hand" at fundamental sciences, in the end, find themselves in the backyard of "science in general and technological progress in general"! But how can one explain this to “scientific” (or rather, near-scientific) “expert analysts” who measure the effectiveness of science with sausage loafs, rivets on jeans, the number of “gadgets” lying in your pocket, smartphone ... and “describing” “something something from science "in their articles?
      1. gridasov 8 February 2020 11: 14 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        A few days ago, I. Musk turned to people that he was considering the development of ideas in AI, regardless of the status of these people in science. But this means that all these start-ups, mathematical institutes and laboratories, etc. do not give a real breakthrough in the creation of methods for analyzing big data. All work with statistical data sampling methods, well, at best, create associative comparisons. But this is not an analysis! But the most interesting thing is that no one wants to make a breakthrough in knowledge. And this is obvious!
    4. Victor N 8 February 2020 10: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In general, the article identifies the problems correctly, but there are immeasurably more. There is another important aspect: for society, the very existence of an ordered intellectual environment as the top of the social hierarchy is important. Otherwise, orientation to pop music, "stars" of show business will quickly lead a society in bedlam.
    5. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Amateur
      And in general, how can science be managed?

      corny - funding research in certain areas ... see film 9 days of one year
      1. Amateur 8 February 2020 17: 16 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        commonplace - funding research in specific areas ... see film 9 days of one year

        And if you read the "Monday" Bro Strugatsky?
        The activities of Vybegallo raise doubts among the institute’s leaders, but the professor gives two references to the members of the revision committee: that “three laboratory assistants from his laboratory annually go to work under the sponsored state farm” and that he himself “once was a prisoner of tsarism”.
  • sergo1914 8 February 2020 05: 44 New
    • 16
    • 6
    +10
    Science was in the USSR. Applied and fundamental. Now she is gone. There are puffy candidates and doctors who bought crusts. Absolutely not able to do at least something. Read their publications. Everything is in open sources. They must be published. Here are published. Petrosyan is resting.
  • Pessimist22 8 February 2020 06: 10 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Comrades scientists, associate professors with candidates!
    Are you tormented with the Xs, entangled in zeros,
    Sit, decompose molecules into atoms,
    Forgetting that decaying potatoes in the fields.
    V. Vysotsky.
    1. Victor N 8 February 2020 10: 38 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The late grandfather periodically asked: "Can you be an accountant on a collective farm?" And completely calmed down after receiving a positive response. The kindest man, holder of the Order of Glory, the whole war in the infantry.
  • Ross xnumx 8 February 2020 06: 15 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    There was no science law in the history of the Russian Empire. Nevertheless, Lomonosov, Tsiolkovsky, Mozhaisk, Sikorsky and thousands of others worked for the good of the country. And their achievements were very tangible and tangible.

    fellow As correctly said!
    Let me ask, are the achievements of these people sitting at the table and taking the right to talk about science, which they transformed into applied craft, “weighty, tangible and material”?
    What our country has achieved according to their results (Kiriyenko, I don't know that, Golikova, and further blurred faces ...) of "scientific activity"?
    It’s strange how among them they didn’t put the main Russian “scientist” from Rusnano ...
    1. Grandfather 8 February 2020 06: 33 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Quote: ROSS 42
      What has our country achieved by the results of their (scientific activity) Kirillenko, I don’t know this, Golikova, and further blurred faces ...)?

      Well ... Golikova threw it out
      : Tatyana Golikova proposed not to consider poor people who have relatives with a household or a car
      it's brilliant! still include the neighbors there!
      1. tihonmarine 8 February 2020 08: 40 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: Dead Day
        Well ... Golikova threw it out
        : Tatyana Golikova proposed not to consider poor people who have relatives with a household or a car
        it's brilliant! still include the neighbors there!

        Yes, this lady will not die of modesty, a true representative of capital. Pharisee and liar. Her hubby is also not a rogue Viktor Khristenko co-owner of luxury golf clubs in the Moscow region and Peterhof. They occupy territories of hundreds of hectares of land, and their cost, according to our estimates, may exceed ten billion rubles. They have modest rural housing, where they help their poor relatives, grown vegetables in their household.
      2. tihonmarine 8 February 2020 08: 45 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Quote: Dead Day
        it's brilliant! still include the neighbors there!

        And then I forgot to show the modest village housing of this cook’s daughter (though mom is a merchandiser) well, and my daughter is a habalka
        Here she personally grows cabbage, potatoes and onions (green) and feeds all the big relatives, her and even relatives Khristenkov.
        1. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 15 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: tihonmarine
          And then I forgot to show the modest village housing of this cook’s daughter (

          look at the modest summer cottages of Soviet members Politburo, ministers, etc.
    2. Victor N 8 February 2020 10: 44 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      A scientific degree and, in a sense, even an academic title are attributes, and a researcher is a profession, not just a position. The minister, even with the title of academician, is not a researcher, even laboratory assistants do not recognize him as his.
  • Gardamir 8 February 2020 06: 53 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    The law is such a feature of the democrats, without the law there is no democracy.
    And we Russians have always lived in good conscience. For example, in the atheist Union, no one would have thought of jumping in churches (dashing 20e is not an example), and in Russia there were Pussies on whom there was no law.
    Or as they said in perestroika, there is no law, it is not forbidden, then it is possible.
    So is science. She is always needed, regardless of the law. Well, now there is a law, there are problems with science.
    1. Boris55 8 February 2020 08: 23 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Quote: Gardamir
      Well, now there is a law, there are problems with science.

      There will be problems with science until it is given a specific task - what do we want from it, but for now we ourselves don’t know. it’s not clear what kind of society we are building, we don’t have to expect anything outstanding from it.

      As an example. The military research teams were given specific tasks - to overtake the main adversary, and science coped with this task perfectly. scientific thought is at our height, if only it could determine the vector of goals and no one will catch us.

      All scientists with a holiday and success in the prosperity of our country!
      .
    2. AU Ivanov. 8 February 2020 10: 33 New
      • 1
      • 6
      -5
      In the atheistic Soviet Union, churches did not jump. They were robbed and blown up.
      1. Gardamir 8 February 2020 12: 36 New
        • 3
        • 3
        0
        I'll be home, I’ll post a photo of the Assumption Cathedral built over 300 years ago, from a computer. In Soviet times, people gathered at a 300km district and no one pursued them.
        At the same time I can upload a photo of the plant, or rather a pile of rubble. The plant was demolished a year ago, did not fit into the market. But the plant is more than a hundred years old and people worked there. It’s true that people don’t care when liberalism moves around the country.
        1. Gardamir 8 February 2020 19: 53 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0

          The Assumption Parish is the oldest in Yaransk. It was founded in parallel with the laying of a fortress on the banks of the Yarani River in 1591. The first wooden Assumption Church served as a garrison temple. First mentioned in 1601.

          The existing stone building was built in 1790-1798 according to the project of architect F.M. Roslyakov. A temple that never closed.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  • demo 8 February 2020 08: 03 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Science, say, our state needs?
    Well, well.
    On hearing, I have some very revealing examples.
    Absolutely without the participation of the state, without the use of laboratories and equipment of research centers, products were developed at their own expense, at their own peril and risk.
    Let's call it Fuel Additive.

    For three years, people tested it on their cars, and on the machines of their friends, acquaintances, and on the machines of strangers.
    All this led to the fact that people realized that they had achieved a truly revolutionary discovery.
    This story begins in 2010.
    Negotiations began with everyone - with whom it is possible and with whom it is impossible.
    Passed all the floors as the executive branch (up to and including the President), legislative (chairmen of the committees on ecology, transport, energy and God knows what else).
    Communicated with the leading centers of scientific research in this area.
    US, Gubkin, various research institutes.
    Naturally, commercial structures - from small fuel producers to monsters - Rosneft and Lukoil.
    This, I note, people did at their own expense. Tickets, accommodation, meals, at your own expense.
    And silence.
    And now the point.
    Products reduce fuel consumption by 15-30%, depending on the type of fuel and the type of ICE.
    And when the situation reached a dead end, people sat down and counted the money.
    Suppose a country adopts these products.
    Saved an average of 20% of petroleum products.
    On a national scale, this will be 20% of 125 million tons of light petroleum products sold.
    Those. 25 million tons.
    The price of petroleum products is known.
    So the country will save hundreds of billions?
    No, it will not save, but not get it!
    Excise taxes.
    Revenue, salaries.
    And then there are pensions and state employees.

    Still products drastically reduce the amount of harmful emissions into the atmosphere.
    Hundreds of times.
    Those. our EURO 3-4-5 fuel on our EURO 3-4-5 engines gives lower emission figures than EURO 6.

    Oil burns are reduced, there are no problems with the coking of both piston rings and the failure of catalytic converters and soot afterburners and filters.
    The additive allows the operation of high-octane engines with low-octane fuel.

    Research took place over a very long period of time.
    Cars traveled 200-300 thousand kilometers.
    Then they were disassembled and analyzed.

    BUT even the presence of positive results for our fellow citizens did not lead to anything.
    It is deaf as in a tank.
    Tear off our last skin - the state strives daily.
    And here is science, the results of which no one needs.
    1. Yuri Simple 8 February 2020 10: 13 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Sell ​​to the West. And these - these will cost! Try to get in touch with someone there. And sell - only with the conditions do not lower the cost. Good luck!
    2. Victor N 8 February 2020 10: 57 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Promoting a scientific result is a separate science. In the process, they can still slam. Such a life. This is all explainable: the researcher must first see the problem and point to it, and then seek solutions. For others, the presence of this problem will not be obvious for a long time, it is always difficult to convince, therefore the results are not implemented for a long time.
  • tihonmarine 8 February 2020 08: 13 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Grigory Perelman, a Russian mathematician, proved the Poincare conjecture
    who said to himself
    Outsiders are not considered those who violate ethical standards in science ... People like me - that’s who is isolated ...
    A brilliant man, a man of honor, but Russian science does not need it, or rather not science, but to those who direct and rule it. For how many bribes and scientists from science feed from this feeding trough, all these Chubais and Kiriyenks are the “great engines of science," who Perelman, like a bone in the throat, or maybe Dima Medvedev got at the mercy of Skolkovo, whom science is interested only in as a means of enrichment.
    1. Victor N 8 February 2020 11: 00 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Why not? Nobody drove him. Long distance originals are not uncommon.
  • Free wind 8 February 2020 08: 16 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    The earth is flat, God created it also of man. Flights to the moon were filmed in Hollywood. The Americans invented all the diseases so that they could buy medicine .. And yes, the genies must also be expelled. the institute seems to be somewhere in the expulsion of genies. And you about science ..... Have a good weekend
  • Lamata 8 February 2020 08: 20 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Happy scientists !! I hope to get rid of bureaucratic evil.
  • polar fox 8 February 2020 08: 36 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    P · RїSЂRμR RoRґRμRЅS, RїRѕRґRїRoSЃR ° S,SЊ Röhr "Ryo RѕS,RєR" RѕRЅRoS,SЊ RRўRћ RЅRμ RјRѕRі, RїRѕSЃRєRѕR "SЊRєSѓ S,RμRєSЃS,, RєRѕS,RѕSЂS <R№ In" RїSЂRѕRіR "SЏRґRμR" roar "PI RЎRѕRІS" RμRґRμ , РЅРµ Р ± С ‹Р» текстом, РєРѕС‚РѕСЂС ‹Р№ РїСЂРёРЅСЏР» Рё РІ Р “РѕСЃРґСѓРјРµ.
    So in the Federation Council not all Russian is known ... what can we say about texts ...
  • Yuri Simple 8 February 2020 09: 00 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Started for health, finished as usual, for peace. Sir gentlemen, have you somehow decided what you really need: Chat "for science" or really working technologies? If the first - write either yourself, or hire a retired goat drummers, which, like any real business, a dime a dozen. But in this case, eat about torsion fields, Petrik filters, charged water, the "true" story, etc. etc. Do not call us, we will not go. If the second - then it costs money, a lot of money. It is purely cheaper to buy in China. So buy your health. Well, scientists will deal with the issue of life in Europe and super-powerful magnetic radiation. For it is more interesting. Do you benefit from this? Here you go! And what do we care about your benefit? We are here about the Fermi theorem more interesting. And the benefits? And for the benefit of Chubais and Katyukov with Dvorkovich. Who paid, to that and for the benefit. And scientists once a week for 1/10 of a salary a month will study laser radiation.
    1. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 21 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Yuri Simple
      Who paid, to that and for the benefit.

      Bravo! hi
  • GenNick 8 February 2020 09: 06 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: _Sergey_
    I remember the Soviet era. Weeding summer and hilling the crop of the sponsored collective farm, harvesting in the fall, help the production workers in the winter to fulfill the plan, and then help the meat factory (they always lacked workers). And then catch up on non-fulfillment of modernization of some node and jambs in technology.

    You will laugh and I remember ...
    We need money, soon holidays like SA Day and Navy Day, March 8, etc. And who does not need them, what to do ??? Everything is simple, and you go to the department of the chief technologist of a shit-and-a-babe flowers '', and you’ve got ice cream ...
    There was no such ???
    1. tihonmarine 8 February 2020 11: 06 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: GenNick
      Everything is simple, and you go to the department of the chief technologist of a shit-and-a-babe flowers '', and you’ve got ice cream ...
      There was no such ???

      I went after fruit work to work (it was a big deal where the monument to Pushkin’s duel) earned my wife flowers and a bottle for myself. Ratsuha is good, but fuss with her more than unloading the car.
  • samarin1969 8 February 2020 09: 13 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    Yes, the academicians seem to have already come "beautiful far away." laughing

    RAS, like the entire system of "scientific nomenclature" has turned into "academicians for academicians." Among colleagues, I have not met or heard of a single person who would have used at least one of the “heights of pedagogical thought”. Dozens of institutes produce meaningless cars of scientific publications. One of them, however, props up the open window in the classroom. laughing The creativity of the pillars of public thought, academicians Bogolyubov and Chubaryan ideologically in the spirit of the video from the EBN Center. Fortunately, the study of history and social science has only a ritual character.
    Science should serve the state and the people, not the "world community." The state must finance science and severely control intellectual property. Business can only help this, but should not determine the development of science. And now the Russian Federation is a scientific personnel vocational school for China and America.
    1. Victor N 8 February 2020 11: 05 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Did not notice the merger of the academies in 2013.
      1. samarin1969 8 February 2020 12: 53 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Victor N
        Did not notice the merger of the academies in 2013.


        And with the "rural academics" - too much. Especially against the faceless achievements. From public names: Alferov, non-academic Perelman ... The rest, probably, are solid "secret physicists". laughing
        1. Victor N 8 February 2020 15: 41 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Plus medicine. But election to the academy is a very conservative and confusing procedure. Each new election has its own dashing scenario. Not for prying eyes.
          As for the "public names", the scientific staff really does not like this, enough communication with colleagues. Sociable - a very rare exception. And suspicious.
          1. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 25 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Victor N
            Sociable - a very rare exception. And suspicious.

            and you try to explain to the layman just what you are doing - in order to understand he has a lot to know ... bully This is any model / actress / songwriter sparkles with charms in cinema / TV and then explains her achievements and thoughts ... bully And everyone is interested ... bully
    2. tihonmarine 8 February 2020 11: 13 New
      • 3
      • 2
      +1
      Quote: samarin1969
      The creativity of the pillars of public thought, academicians Bogolyubov and Chubaryan ideologically in the spirit of the video from the EBN Center. Fortunately, the study of history and social science has only a ritual character.

      I already thought that “scientific communism” and “political economy of foreign countries” had sunk into the summer, and looking at the growth schedule of academicians, I realized that capitalism creates more jobs for them than socialism.
    3. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: samarin1969
      The state must finance science and severely control intellectual property.

      Well, it will be like now ... bully The state is officials ...
  • GenNick 8 February 2020 09: 18 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: Ilya-spb
    Happy Holidays!

    I'm a scientist. And I see science from the inside. And I see the education system in universities and the decision-making system.

    Pros:

    1) We have many talents. Both young and adult.

    2) We are updating the material and technical base. The state is actually financing the acquisition of devices.

    3) There are a lot of growth points - both in chemistry and in biotechnology. We are not far behind forever.

    Cons:

    1) The gap between academic science, education and implementation (commercialization).
    Many applied (not fundamental) developments are made by scientists "for show", and not for sale, not for business needs. Often, Russian science is not ready to satisfy even for money the needs of commercial companies

    2) We have not developed a culture of international patenting and attracting investment.

    3) The brain drain continues. One of the obstacles is that there is no way young and decisive in our country. It's hard for a young scientist to break through. In departments and laboratories, much has been captured by "respected scientists" who sit in leadership positions.

    4) we do not have an administration for scientists, but scientists for the administration. In the West, the scientist does not fight with accounting, for the opportunity to buy the necessary reagents, and with funding, he quickly receives an order and works.

    5) About the decision-making system for grants, I ... keep silent))). Although there are improvements.

    6) We have a poorly developed culture of foreign publications of scientific results. There is an objective reason: in many scientific areas there are different methodological approaches in our country and abroad. For example, experiments on animals in the West require strict adherence to bioethics when growing and killing an object (from mice and rats and above).

    7) And, finally, global: in the last five years, we have begun to measure the effectiveness of applied science not with patents and volumes of implementation, but with publications in international publications. This is complete nonsense.

    But I believe in improving the situation.

    Happy Holidays!

    ,, ... I believe, friends,
    rocket caravans
    rush us forward
    from star to star ... ''
    Happy Holidays!
  • Sergey79 8 February 2020 09: 22 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    ANECDOT about the university teacher:

    Once I caught a fish teacher. She turned out to be golden. And a goldfish begged: "Let me go a wise teacher !!!! All that you ask - I will fulfill!"
    Without thinking twice, the teacher told her: “Compile the teaching and methodological department in all disciplines, do not forget about the OP, so that each competency is covered, intersubject communications are realized, the literature is relevant, the CDS is detailed by type of activity, and so you can measure how competencies are formed. Yes, so that everything is in accordance with GOSO ++. Fill in the teacher’s IPR and the mutual attendance journal. Make a career guidance plan and take all the necessary preventive measures so that the students are well-educated and without omissions attend classes, and God forbid that came under deduction. Also consider how to ensure the quality set for the next year, and the employment of each graduate this year, so that performance indicators have been met. Prepare articles HAC and Scopus. And all this is done by October. And more
    Do not lose sight of the electronic Vedomosti and control points, as well as the content in the DO department. At the same time, do not forget about high-quality preparation for lectures and practical exercises, speaking at a seminar method on the used innovative technologies, and preparing student projects for contests and competitions. Yes, and don’t forget about grant applications .... "

    And the fish answered without hesitation: "FRY !!!!!!!"
    1. ser56 8 February 2020 17: 27 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Sergey79
      literature was relevant

      not older than 5 years and was in the required quantity in the library .... bully
  • midshipman 8 February 2020 10: 03 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Happy holiday to you fellow scientists.
    I have been working in science and in the creation of civilian products and military high-voltage vehicles since 1963. Doctor of Technical Sciences Scientist of the Russian Federation, Laureate of State Prizes, prepared more than 100 doctors and candidates of sciences. Currently published on the recommendation of our President, 7 monographs in Singapore in ed. "Springer" on flight safety issues, another 8 monographs in translation. These books will be sold in 192 countries. This is how we promote our Russian science. And in Soviet times, under my leadership, automated control systems for civil aviation were introduced in European countries.
  • aybolyt678 8 February 2020 10: 54 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    The development of science is possible only when there is a bunch of Science - Implementation. It should be short.
    Implementation requires production. Ubiquitous. Bulk. And not just a military man.
    1. Golovan Jack 8 February 2020 14: 02 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      Quote: aybolyt678
      The development of science is possible only when there is a bunch of Science - Implementation. It should be short

      Trepidation.

      Steklov Institute of Mathematics is an example to you.

      Doctor. Canine. About nothing negative
      1. aybolyt678 10 February 2020 07: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Golovan Jack
        Steklov Institute of Mathematics is an example to you.

        I'm not completely aware of what is wrong with the Institute of Mathematics? I'm sorry I do not watch TV, there is trepidation.
        PS: it hurts you Roman became a squeamish ulcer! prostatitis does not bother ??
    2. AU Ivanov. 8 February 2020 20: 45 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      What implementation can fundamental science relate to? Well, at least the Poincaré theorem proved by Perelman?
      1. aybolyt678 10 February 2020 07: 35 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: AU Ivanov.
        What implementation can fundamental science relate to?

        the presence of fundamental knowledge in the field of sociology, and their practical use, for example, would not allow Perestroika in the 90s laughing . In the field of virology, which is close to me, the presence of fundamental knowledge does not allow us to believe in the presence of the bird flu virus, which is dangerous for humans. In fact, fundamental science does not lag far behind technologies, let’s say, it overtakes them somewhat at the stage of theorizing. Technologies today are the fruits that are usually born at the junction of several fundamental sciences. Scientists who, in their knowledge have come close to the line requiring confirmation of their mental research, do not find in our country the opportunity to translate their ideas. For, Science, like everything else, is placed at the service of money. And we have money only in limited military areas. Therefore, really brainy scientists are leaving for America, and, as a new trend, to China.
        For a specific answer to your question, I give an example of creating an Ebola vaccine.
  • nikvic46 8 February 2020 11: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The legislative assembly is clearly not enough representatives of applied science and representatives of the real sector of industry. They do not have to be at every meeting. But often their presence is simply necessary.
  • seacap 8 February 2020 13: 58 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: Dead Day
    Russian science, apparently only works on the military-industrial complex

    And the military-industrial complex, this is almost all the legacy and development of the "former luxury" of stagnation of the "tyranny regime"
  • Golovan Jack 8 February 2020 14: 01 New
    • 6
    • 3
    +3
    So. Purely on the date, despite the stasiks and those who joined them:

    - despite everything - science is alive. I know firsthand.
    - fundamental - yes, it seems to be repaid, and for a long time. Also firsthand - I know people who work at the IHP RAS. For instance.
    - the fact that all this will rise over time is beyond doubt. But the fact that it will take a lot of time - also ... does not. Which is very sad, I would like to "already yesterday."
    - when it fell apart - I saw it myself. Of the people who graduated with me at the same time - two in Japan, three in Switzerland, a dozen - in Canada and the United States ... the couple also works in Russia. Shitty score, if by the end, the guys were really strong.

    But - notwithstanding - Happy Science Day! And - we will try to break through, we - do not get used good yes
  • Shahno 8 February 2020 14: 05 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Golovan Jack
    Quote: aybolyt678
    The development of science is possible only when there is a bunch of Science - Implementation. It should be short

    Trepidation.

    Steklov Institute of Mathematics is an example to you.

    Doctor. Canine. About nothing negative

    I do not know. Che no longer want to us? Well, academics are understandable, they are at the feeding trough.
    That is not enough for everyone. Well, what does the math have to do with it?
  • seacap 8 February 2020 14: 12 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    It all starts with primary school education and upbringing, which is successfully destroyed, according to the "covenants and plans" of a dead, but not stupid Pole, under the vigilant control of instruments of external neocolonial management of the territories of the Central Bank and the Higher School of Economics with the appropriate units in the form of a colonial administration such as the government and all sorts of advice, parliaments, to simulate the plebs of democracy. "Advanced consumers", "effective managers" who built an inherited estate society in which the main measure of everything and everything is the loot, which replaces everything else and everything the so-called. moral, ethical and cultural values, also being a measure there, are not capable of physically or intellectually creatively creating and developing, and most importantly, they are not motivated in this, despising the country and people who gave birth to them, without linking their future with them.
  • seacap 8 February 2020 14: 22 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: Tatiana
    Skolkovo and Rusnano, these are structures created under FEEDING of Chubais

    Not only for the red-haired, this is a whole corporation for "cutting" the budget, the fundamental scientific activity of which is to create various schemes and cash flows, under the vigilant control of the "Honored Adventurer of Russia" and Co.
  • ser56 8 February 2020 16: 39 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    By his maxims, the author showed his ignorance, no more ... bully
    For example: “I won’t ask the question“ why. ”And then that nuclear explosions are forbidden, and it is necessary to investigate matter in such critical conditions - in order to be able to simulate ... hi
    "But nevertheless, Lomonosov, Tsiolkovsky, Mozhaisk, Sikorsky and thousands of others worked for the good of the country. And their achievements were very tangible and tangible." you can find out the material achievements of Tsiolkovsky or Mozhaisk - in the coordinates of the author they are engaged in nonsense! bully But Lomonosov has developed a domestic technology for producing smalt for mosaics - well done! repeat
  • BAI
    BAI 8 February 2020 16: 46 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Что РєР ° СЃР ° ется Р »РёРІРµСЂРјРѕСЂРёСЏ Рё С“ Р ”еровия -“ РІ РІСЂРёСЂРѕРґРµ РЅРµС °С …Р… »СЊРєРѕ синтеР· РѕРј, РїСЂР ° РєС‚РёС З РµСЃРєР ° СЏ С † енность РЅСѓР» евР° СЏ.

    If the author does not understand anything in basic research, then there is no need to take up articles on science. These same officials who do not understand anything sit in the government and ask, “Why? Where is the benefit?” I will reveal to the author one very interesting thing - basic research does not have practical value at the time of the study. This is a job for the future. And after several decades, when there will be completely different people in the government, these studies will bring practical value (not because the officials will be different, it’s just time to implement these studies, so to speak, “the conditions will ripen”). But you need to spend money on research now, so you don’t end up as an outsider.
    In general, the author signed a complete misunderstanding of the problem.
    I strongly suspect that for the discovery of new elements, people will receive the Nobel Prize.
  • Old Horseradish 8 February 2020 20: 58 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    We have a science: how to turn the richest country in the world into a subcolony with an endangered population. You think no brains are needed for this? What kind of brains are needed! This is science! How to make Newfeudal people with multi-billion dollar fortunes and tens of millions of beggars. Golden brains are working on it. And we are being rubbed that it just so happened. No, it's all about science.
  • Yura 9 February 2020 14: 21 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    For a start:
    Heavy duty fields of Sarov. In the famous city of Sarov, scientists have developed a method for producing heavy-duty magnetic fields. Using magneto-cumulative explosive generators, where the wave from the explosion “compresses” the field, it was possible to obtain fields of 28 MG. Such a value is a record of artificial magnetic fields, it is 100 million times more than the strength of the Earth’s field.
    Such fields, as stated in the source, can be used in studies of the behavior of substances in various extreme conditions.
    I will not ask the question "why."
    In principle, this is the prospect of deep space exploration (the use of antimatter).
    Given that the task was completely mathematical, in vain he did not take a million.
    Why does he need a million, he owns the universe (he knows that he is not a buffoon, he knows his own worth, he treats himself with respect).
    Scientists at the Russian University of Gas and Oil, after conducting a number of studies, argue that hydrocarbons can be created not as a result of decomposition of organic substances, as is commonly believed, but in a non-biological way. It was found that the upper layer of the mantle at a depth of 150 kilometers has all the conditions for the formation of complex hydrocarbon systems.
    Is it helpful? Maybe.
    Definitely useful.
  • iouris 11 February 2020 00: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If everyone is able to judge science, then the state of science itself causes concern. The French Academy is an elite club of 40 "immortals", as it is called. Once in it, they remain for life. Article 24 of the Charter of 1635 formulated the main task of the Academy - the regulation of the French language, common and understandable for everyone, which would be equally used in literary practice and in colloquial speech; for this purpose, the creation of the Dictionary, as well as Rhetoric, Poetics and Grammar, was supposed. Such a task met the deep-seated needs of French society: the nation realized itself as a single whole within the framework of a single state, and language was to become the cementing foundation of this unity. The merit of Richelieu is that he understood and realized this need.
    And with us, almost anyone can shout at the academician. There are about 900 of them there. But what is the state of the Russian language?
  • Dedok 13 February 2020 11: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    all right.
    And you can talk about the current nuances endlessly: look around - that it’s not the administrator, either the candidate or the doctor! In these situations (administrators) give money only to those who distribute degrees.
    And universities today - youth does not go - because s / n funny; old people are removed - because they compare what was and what they plant now; and who will teach youth in universities? - those who are fed by administrators?
    30 years ago it collapsed, but nothing was created in return and will not be created, why? where is our money - behind the cordon to legalize their owner, HE to spend it there - on charity, and what is it? How many millions a year does Abramovich donate to the formation of the Kingdom? from such numbers the head is spinning. And how many Abramovichs are there?
    The trouble, in general.
  • Campanella 13 February 2020 17: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Science is the lot of passionaries, not clerks with a big financial shoulder. And in my opinion, oddly enough, the source of scientific creativity is primarily an ideology.
    Russia has no ideology, no national idea, no distant prospect. The desire to simply integrate into the "civilized" world does not solve any problems, but creates only problems.
    And alas, the attempt of a group of people to hold Russia in their hands can not help science in any way and inevitably destroys everything around.
  • Campanella 13 February 2020 17: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I see how, with “enthusiasm,” the expert group is revising the constitution according to the trends of the time and the president’s desire and I understand that there is nothing worthwhile except solving the short-term tasks of the modern Russian elite. Dog breeder offers to guard dogs, athlete athletes, etc. The indexation of pensions will be prescribed and some other thing .... The question is, if you write food on the fence, will I start to eat everything and stop starving?
    Life is interesting for its unpredictability ... And what if pensions are canceled? It turns out that indexing is unnecessary? I don’t remember the fact that pension payments were included in the constitution? And science and stuff are trivialities. As Medvedev said, if we do not know how to do this, then we will buy it from someone who knows how to do it!
    And if a person has no mind? What can he buy? But how many copperheads are in power?