A video of the interrupted landing of the Su-24 due to unreached chassis struts is shown

Images appeared on the network with an interrupted landing of the Su-24 front-line bomber. It is reported that the incident occurred in January of this year, but the specific airport is not called.

The plane landed with the front landing gear, but without the rear landing. Allegedly, the bomber’s crew did not know that the rear landing gears had not been released.

From the frames it is clear that the crew received a command, which implies an interruption of the landing process, at the very last moment. Flight Manager:

Turns to the maximum!

The bomber managed to gain height again, but at the same time, with the back part, he touched the runway.

After climbing 50-60 m, the crew was informed what was the reason for the abrupt cancellation of the landing. The pilots learned that only the front landing gear reached the aircraft during an attempt to land on the airfield.

If the video is not training, then the composure of the flight director can only be envied.

Comments

[Siberian 66]

I have never heard of such training sessions with jabbing concrete aircraft. In general terms, I would like to know how it ended. Hopefully landed without consequences. For pilots and cars. And the consequences for the technicians and the command as a whole are predictable.

[helmi8]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

I have never heard of such training sessions with jabbing concrete aircraft.

Yes, they don’t exist ... In addition, the landing gear is produced by one crane of three racks at once, and not separately.

[Spektr]

It’s good that everything ended without casualties and loss of the car, and they will patch the scratch. In this case, the failure of the mechanism and the pilot worked courageously and calmly.

[Nikolay R-PM]

in my opinion there is not a scratch, but the ventral ridges on the motor bores that are "sharpened" about the strip. On my urgent request, in each flight support shift, one of the conscripts was with the responsible officer in the "guardhouse" at the end of the strip and watched the racks go out and then reported to the command post

[Spektr]

But then, even the alarm should have worked for the pilot that the racks came out. Probably already figured out what happened, since everything happened in January.

[Kamchatsky]

It seems that the crew did not read the map of control checks (maybe the military calls it differently), did not look at the scoreboard, and the observer considered the raven. On the Yak -18T, 52 and others. On the racks, the limit switches and bulbs stand, an indication of the racks to locks. The stand locks - the light comes on, it can be seen from the ground - three pieces are on. And this is in addition to the indication in the cockpit.

[Glory1974]

It seems that the crew did not read the map of control checks (maybe the military calls it differently), did not look at the scoreboard, and the observer considered the raven.

In my opinion you are unfair. The crew most likely refused the landing gear signaling, the flight director did not count the raven and warned the crew. I don’t know about the observer, maybe he doesn’t.

[Kamchatsky]

If the alarm fails, press the "Day-Night" switch on the chassis display with your finger, thereby checking the serviceability of the lamps, and if three green ones are off, then go-around, into the zone, etc.
Z. s. I don’t know about the mechanical pointers on the Su-24, many civilians have "soldiers".
But this does not cancel reading the map.

[Amborlakatay]

No planes are visible from the cockpit of the Su-24, from the word "absolutely"

[Kamchatsky]

What can you do, the layout is this.

[bober1982]

Quote: Amborlakatai

No planes are visible from the cockpit of the Su-24, from the word "absolutely"

Where did they get it? The review is very good.

[Kamchatsky]

Well, I think that monitoring take-off - landing (and also video recording) - should be provided. And this event is not too expensive.
And why did someone draw a minus for you - do not pay attention!

[RUS96]

Quote: Kamchatka

It seems that the crew did not read the checklist

[VO3A]

What nonsense! Non-aviation fiction .. The crew should be removed from flights until the tests are completed. The "Chassis Observer" encouragement, sometimes a watch is given, the flight director is grateful ...
Now in the order. The serviceability of the bulbs in the alarm panel is checked three times before each departure, including the pilot .., and the burned out bulb will never light up, rather, on the contrary, the stand will come out and the bulb will not light up .. Does the pilot report landing gear release and request permission to land? ! Bulbs of the released position should light up ?! And they light up after the limit switches are activated in the locks of the released position ... and separately for each rack ... Without a report on the readiness and release of the chassis, no one will allow landing ... So the pilots formally carried out the report without checking the released position of the chassis ...

[shura7782]

Quote: Nikolay R-PM

at the end of the strip and watched the racks come out and then reported to the cdp

That's right, Nikolai, it was like that everywhere.

[Nikolay R-PM]

good time of day), ie is it a common practice for aviation of "multiple duplication", when the report from the aircraft checks and duplicates the ground crew? I, because I know only one base about the spread of this practice, not very well aware of it))

[Vanek30]

This is still there. Only now this is being done by an officer who sits on the UPC (or KDP) next to the Flight Director and controls the landing gear output through binoculars. + reports on the air "released". This time he apparently only saw the front pillar and relaxed ...

[avia12005]

Not in the "guardhouse", but at the UPC - the starting command post. There is a PRP - the assistant flight director with binoculars and overseeing the release of the landing gear. In addition to radio and wire communication, there is a light alarm. Yellow - standby mode, green - landing gear down, red - no. It can be assumed that if the non-release of the main struts took place, they simply "yawned" at the TFR.

[Nikolay R-PM]

thank you very much for the science) otherwise I would put it in vernacular)

[Doliva63]

Quote: Spectrum

It’s good that everything ended without casualties and loss of the car, and they will patch the scratch. In this case, the failure of the mechanism and the pilot worked courageously and calmly.

The crew worked as the RP ordered, no more. In the army, there is no "pilot" position, there is a "pilot".

[Spektr]

Thanks! I will consider for the future.

[helmi8]

Quote: Doliva63

In the army, there is no "pilot" position, there is a "pilot".

There is a "commander of a helicopter (aircraft, ship, crew)," a senior pilot "(leading a pair), and then a flight commander, squadron, regiment ..., there is a navigator pilot, an operator pilot. But simply a" pilot "is not such a position.

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: helmi8

there is a navigator pilot, an operator pilot. And just a "pilot" - there is no such position.

And the "radio operator" where did he go?

[helmi8]

Quote: Nikolaevich I

And the "radio operator" where did he go?

On different types of aircraft, its crew. And it was about the position of the flight crew, and not the flight-lifting. In addition to the radio operator gunner, there is also a pure flight attendant, gunner, airborne technician (engineer), airborne technician-air gunner (on Mi-8TV, Mi-8MT), navigator, mechanic (technician) according to ADO ... They just forgot about the flight attendants. ..

[Nikolaevich I]

Quote: helmi8

They just forgot about the stewardess ...

And what about them to remember when money is only for vodka? Not up to the shampoo!

[Andrey NM]

In the memoirs of the GSS Arkhipenko F.F. there’s a funny passage about this when checking out the district air force commander:

Suddenly he gave the command to build the flight crew of the 2nd air squadron. The construction was carried out exemplary and the squadron commander Captain Golov reported to him. When going around, the general asked everyone: “Who are you?”, And since the pilots had additional posts, the answers followed - “flight commander, adjutant, nachkhim, head of the paratrooper service.” I recommended myself as the deputy commissar of the air squadron for the Komsomol. Only one of us did not have an additional position and he replied: "The pilot is a fighter, junior lieutenant Avlukov." The commander smiled at the same time, shook his hand and said: "Hello, Comrade Avlukov, I finally met the pilot."

[Doliva63]

Quote: helmi8

Quote: Doliva63

In the army, there is no "pilot" position, there is a "pilot".

There is a "commander of a helicopter (aircraft, ship, crew)," a senior pilot "(leading a pair), and then a flight commander, squadron, regiment ..., there is a navigator pilot, an operator pilot. But simply a" pilot "is not such a position.

Seriously? Where are you from? Who do you think runs the singles? I'm talking about planes, if that. Like the "rotary-winged", not in the know. Although they were friends with them and drank alcohol together periodically

[helmi8]

Quote: Doliva63

Seriously? Where did you fall from? And who do you think manages single rooms? I'm talking about airplanes, if that.

Before you put the cons - study the question. Every aircraft, even a single one, has a technician. And in total, it will be a crew.

[Doliva63]

Quote: helmi8

Quote: Doliva63

Seriously? Where did you fall from? And who do you think manages single rooms? I'm talking about airplanes, if that.

Before you put the cons - study the question. Every aircraft, even a single one, has a technician. And in total, it will be a crew.

There are no fixed planes in the Air Force. Question removed?

[helmi8]

Quote: Doliva63

There are no fixed planes in the Air Force. Question removed?

There is no UTP, according to combat calculation, each has his own plane. Clever is not necessary, if not in the subject. You may not answer, the dialogue with you is pointless ...

[Doliva63]

Quote: helmi8

Quote: Doliva63

There are no fixed planes in the Air Force. Question removed?

There is no UTP, according to combat calculation, each has his own plane. Clever is not necessary, if not in the subject. You may not answer, the dialogue with you is pointless ...

Well, yes, if the plane is not in the TEC or elsewhere but I'm talking about peacetime.

[helmi8]

Quote: Doliva63

Well, yes, if the plane is not in the TEC or elsewhere

For the gifted, who are from an armored train, I explain the last time and the topic is closed on this. The pilot is specialty, the same as a tanker, artilleryman, etc. .... A position is a completely different concept, unless of course it tells you something. You can be a pilot, but you can be a flight manager or a chief of staff by job ... Did he even serve in the army at least urgently? Or did you study on the Internet, a well-deserved minuser ...

[Andrey NM]

Quote: helmi8

For the gifted, who are from an armored train, I explain the last time and the topic is closed on this. A pilot is a specialty, such as a tanker, artilleryman, etc.

I would like to clarify. A specialty is what is written in a diploma or according to the VUS. In the diploma of a graduate of a flying school, specifically a fighter pilot (specifically asked a friend, he had graduated from Kacha, flew a MiG-29) it is written - specialty: combat use and operation of aircraft, qualification - pilot-engineer. And now the positions are called pilot, senior pilot, flight commander, squadron commander, regiment navigator, etc. As I understand it, it depends on what they fly and on the staffing table. Well, the flight director - there is also such a position. In parallel: a graduate of the Naval School recorded a specialty, for example, the armament of ships, and as many as two qualifications - an officer with a higher military special education (there was a supplement to the diploma in personal affairs) and an electrical engineer. Navigators have a navigational engineer, etc. But the positions were called "group engineer", "group commander", "combat unit commander", "senior assistant commander", "commander", etc. It was in the 80s. I don’t know how it is now. Well, I don't think it's very different. Maybe the qualifications and specialty of the name changed in the light of education reforms.

[Doliva63]

Quote: helmi8

Quote: Doliva63

Well, yes, if the plane is not in the TEC or elsewhere

For the gifted, who are from an armored train, I explain the last time and the topic is closed on this. The pilot is specialty, the same as a tanker, artilleryman, etc. .... A position is a completely different concept, unless of course it tells you something. You can be a pilot, but you can be a flight manager or a chief of staff by job ... Did he even serve in the army at least urgently? Or did you study on the Internet, a well-deserved minuser ...

So a graduate of the AUL in the regiment comes to the post of pilot. And the flight manager is the commander or deputy regiment or AE, if the AE flies, but this is not a position, it is appointed for the day of flights / shift. It seems that of the two of us in the Air Force, only I served

[chenia]

Quote: Doliva63

In the army, there is no "pilot" position, there is a "pilot".

They are flyers, they called us gunners here.

[Vanek30]

Quote: Nikolai R-PM

... On my urgent request, in each flight support shift, one of the conscripts was with the responsible officer in the "guardhouse" at the end of the strip and watched the racks come out and then reported to the command post

This is still there. Only now this is being done by an officer who sits on the UPC (or KDP) next to the Flight Director and controls the landing gear output through binoculars. + reports on the air "released". This time he apparently only saw the front pillar and relaxed ...

[Amborlakatay]

Correctly. Turnovers are still slowly growing, so a drawdown is inevitable.

[Starover_Z]

If the video is not training, then the composure of the flight director can only be envied.

Flight manager PROFESSIONAL ! In a split second, assess the situation, as they say, "pump" and give a short, capacious command "RPM at maximum!" AC !!!

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Starover_Z

Flight Manager PROFESSIONAL

Naturally. As I understand it, RPs put the most experienced pilots.

and give a short, capacious command "Turnover at maximum

This is, of course, "aerobatics" in management.

[Vanek30]

Quote: Starover_Z

Flight manager PROFESSIONAL ! In a split second, assess the situation, as they say, "pump" and give a short, capacious command "RPM at maximum!" AC !!!

If he were a professional, he would notice the absence of struts in the near drive area, and sent the board to the second circle in time. Only with a clear phrase "TURNOVER MAXIMUM, CARE FOR THE SECOND CIRCLE!" And not just MAXIMAL, and after a while to clarify something.

[alexmach]

Only with a clear phrase "TURNOVER MAXIMUM, CARE FOR THE SECOND CIRCLE!"

And that is exactly what he said actually.

And not just MAXIMUM

[Cryvedco]

Quote: Vanek30

Only with a clear phrase "TURNOVER MAXIMUM, CARE FOR THE SECOND CIRCLE!" And not just MAXIMAL, and after a while to clarify something.

Too long, the situation here was critical, time was lost, in this case a shorter and more capacious phrase would be appropriate, for which it would be banned. Campaign agent of foreign intelligence, it is necessary to hit the FSB, let them check.

[Amborlakatay]

And you’ll see a horseradish over the neighbor, all racks are released or not, because this is at least 2 km from the RP

[alexmach]

Flight Manager PROFESSIONAL! In a split second, assess the situation, as they say, "pump" and give a short, capacious command "Turns at maximum!" AC !!!

And here there are questions of who the professional is there. We noticed it at the very last moment, but we should have done it earlier.

[Chaldon48]

But then the chassis still managed to release, since it worked out.

[Nikolay R-PM]

if my memory serves me right, then when the hydraulics fails (like the second hydraulic system is responsible for the landing gear cleaning), the pneumatic duplicates it. although 7 years have passed since the dismissal, I can deceive. Yes, and as a conscript materiel taught so far as

[Amborlakatay]

Yes, the point is not that, yes, the pneumatic system duplicates, the question is why the non-release of the main struts was snapped?

[Genry]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

And the consequences for the technicians and the command as a whole are predictable.

Apparently a very old record. Otherwise, the contributor would have a bunch of problems.

[Sky strike fighter]

It is alleged that the recording was made in January 2020. Details on the link below.

the crew allegedly did not look at the real readings of the instruments, including the warning lights for the landing gear. At the same time, the flight director (RP) noticed what was happening only in the last seconds before touching the strip, as he was blinded by headlights.

“RP gave the right command -“ maximum speed ”(and not“ afterburner ”, at which there is a short-term drop in engine thrust). But while these revolutions reached their maximum, the car struck her ass on the runway, ”the publication says.

http://in24.org/incidents/38479

[Orkraider]

Old or not, no one knows.
But RP worked perfectly, everyone is safe and the plane flies.
They write that this photo belongs to the plane with the video)))
Allegedly.

[Thrall]

Quote: Orkraider

They write that this photo belongs to the plane with the video)))
Allegedly.

Photo 2005 of the year.

https://forums.jetcareers.com/threads/su-24-fencer.128232/post-1777503

[Orkraider]

Thank you.
I didn’t guess to conduct a photo search.
Then, with a high degree of probability, the video is old.

[shura7782]

Allegedly.

In this photo, the comb is supposedly intact.

[Genry]

Quote: Orkraider

Old or not, no one knows.
But RP worked perfectly, everyone is safe and the plane flies.

It is indicated that:

There is reason to believe that these damage has already been repaired and the machine continues to fly.

https://tlg.name/s/voenvz
This means that it took a lot of time: to debrief the flights, to defend and repair the aircraft and to "reward" those who distinguished themselves ...

[Lipchanin]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

Hopefully landed without consequences. For pilots and cars.

Well, if something was, then probably already reported.
I mean a serious accident

[kit88]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

And the consequences for the technicians and the command as a whole are predictable.

You can learn more about the consequences for technicians and command.
Well, those that are predictable.

[Nyrobsky]

Damn, while watching these 54 seconds - something is already sweating. Not regularly, but clearly, as if it was intended. Well done. How did it end?

[alexmach]

Yes, what else is training with an unreleased chassis. Failure of technology. Thank God both the dispatcher and the crew worked.

[Amborlakatay]

There are no flight controllers in military aviation

[Vladimir_2U]

Quote: Sibiryak 66

I have never heard of such training drills with airplane jabbing concrete

I've never heard of the Abort Landing command. Interrupt landing!

[Berkut154]

Interestingly, while the three green ones are on fire, was there a report?

[jaroff]

The Su-24 has no rear landing gear. There are front and main landing gear. In this story, the main posts did not come out.

[keeper03]

This applies to all aircraft! Only the main racks! Journalists are off topic!

[Piramidon]

Quote: keeper03

This applies to all aircraft!

An-2 does not apply.

[Kamchatsky]

And the An-2 is generally a unique car!

[Piramidon]

There are also front and rear struts on aircraft with a "bicycle" type of landing gear arrangement. Such as Yak-25/28, M-4, 3M ...

[Alexey RA]

Quote: Kamchatka

And the An-2 is generally a unique car!

Yeah ...

- I’m aboard such and such, the remainder of the fuel is 400 kilograms, I fly on one engine, the chassis are not removed!

[Timx]

An-2 does not apply

And Be-12 ..

[Goblin]

Well, it happens .. I’m sure that it all ended well Otherwise, there would have certainly been a continuation laid out and groaned ..

[Svarog51]

Camera on the tracks in the order of things. And objects of this purpose are still not equipped. Video reports from witnesses. It may be worth paying attention to and supplying. As far as I know, take-off and landing are the most difficult elements of flight. Record in this case is unlikely to be superfluous? I would like to know the opinion of the pilots. The opinion of flight managers, too.

[midshipman]

Amazing video.
I remember in Vladimirovka (military unit 25650) I watched the MiG-25 landing with a damaged front pillar. The pilot performed all the best and the plane did not hurt. And it happened that during takeoff one wheel of the front strut fell off. We were on the radar and noticed how the wheel rolls along the runway. Immediately called the CP. The flight director quickly decided everything.

[Magog]

Probably the wheel studs were pulled over at the next replacement of the "master" of the vehicle - a classic case for motorists!

[Well done]

If the video is not training, then the composure of the flight director can only be envied.

Never mind training! There is no composure, here are pros pilots and hands. flight, as well as Fortune.

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Welldone

If the video is not training, then the composure of the flight director can only be envied.

Never mind training! There is no composure, here are pros pilots and hands. flight, as well as Fortune.

Just the fact is that the pilots' guilt in this incident is fully proven and they will be full ...
They did not release the main racks ...
Forgot.
and went to land.
Well done here only RP.

[Yok Migarek]

Exactly. Well done only RP. And there are a lot of guilty: the pilot and the navigator did not control the landing gear release, the observer of the landing gear landing on the ground (assigned for each flight) did not see the unreleased landing gear, the assistant flight director (PRP) is similar !!! Sloppiness at all stages of control by officials.
PS It is impossible to release only the front pillar and not release the main ones. The outlet is controlled by one crane in the cockpit. There is a failure of technology. But everyone had to determine this refusal.

[Amborlakatay]

I agree, bro!

[shura7782]

Issues such as indication of landing gear landing gear, report to the flight manager about landing gear landing before landing, approach monitor with binoculars, which also watches the lights on landing gear struts ........
Although, in front of my eyes, the An-26 "postman" forgot to release racks at night. Pro slid down the runway on his belly. All right.
And this tank under the belly .....
In general - "Prerequisite for a flight accident".

[iouris]

Quote: shura7782

In general - "Prerequisite for a flight accident".

The term "flight accident" has not been used since the times of the USSR, it has been replaced by "aircraft accident", therefore, instead of "prerequisite" should be used "aircraft incident". Like this ("let's agree on the concepts").

[shura7782]

The term "flight accident" has not been used since the times of the USSR,

I do not remember this subtlety, although I found a transition from the USSR to the Russian Federation in a regiment. Thanks for the help.)))

[kit88]

Quote: shura7782

I do not remember this subtlety

Lies Vicki as always.
This is according to the new PRAPI in 1999 introduced.

[Doliva63]

Quote: shura7782

Issues such as indication of landing gear landing gear, report to the flight manager about landing gear landing before landing, approach monitor with binoculars, which also watches the lights on landing gear struts ........
Although, in front of my eyes, the An-26 "postman" forgot to release racks at night. Pro slid down the runway on his belly. All right.
And this tank under the belly .....
In general - "Prerequisite for a flight accident".

Definitely! And the RP will get it.

[Amborlakatay]

Of course! It was necessary to pull the PRP - are you observing the chassis? Well, he would have kicked the observer

[dmmyak40]

Quote: shura7782

Issues such as indication of landing gear landing gear, report to the flight manager about landing gear landing before landing, approach monitor with binoculars, which also watches the lights on landing gear struts ........
Although, in front of my eyes, the An-26 "postman" forgot to release racks at night. Pro slid down the runway on his belly. All right.
And this tank under the belly .....
In general - "Prerequisite for a flight accident".

In Bykovo, the flight mechanic of the local An-24 squadron took off and cleaned the landing gear when taking off without a FAC command ... The aircraft did not even come off the runway, but he suddenly decided to remove it ... I think that everyone knows how it ended. Thank God everyone was safe and sound ...

[Doliva63]

Really RP tupanul, and did not show composure. And now, perhaps, they do not observe the landing, as before, when they reported from the roof of the "skyscraper": the landing gear was not released?

[SovAr238A]

Quote: Doliva63

Really RP tupanul, and did not show composure. And now, perhaps, they do not observe the landing, as before, when they reported from the roof of the "skyscraper": the landing gear was not released?

I do not agree.
RP did not see unreleased racks due to dazzling headlights.
As soon as I saw it, I immediately started yelling about "maximum" ...

[Doliva63]

Quote: SovAr238A

Quote: Doliva63

Really RP tupanul, and did not show composure. And now, perhaps, they do not observe the landing, as before, when they reported from the roof of the "skyscraper": the landing gear was not released?

I do not agree.
RP did not see unreleased racks due to dazzling headlights.
As soon as I saw it, I immediately started yelling about "maximum" ...

In my time, the RP did not look after this at all, watched a specially appointed outfit and reported to the RP. I remember the incident at the ZKP during the check: the outfit reports - there is no chassis, the inspector asks the regiment commander - what are your actions? Well, that, of course, into the microphone something like "52nd, for the 2nd circle." Reviewer: wrong. The carrier squadron entered without a landing gear, the right decision for you is to shoot yourself. Is it funny? But what happened was.

[Piramidon]

First of all, the crew stupidly, not paying attention to the fact that the green warning lights for the release of the main racks do not light

[Eug]

So it seems that the headlights should definitely light up when the chassis racks are locked. And the technician specially allocated (sometimes he is at the starting inspection) if he saw the headlights, then he reported about it, if there were no headlights, the chassis were not released ...

[kit88]

if there are no headlights, the chassis is not released

So there is a headlight. But there is no chassis. And what to report?

[Aleks1973]

Quote: SovAr238A

They did not release the main racks ...
Forgot.
and went to land.

Something new ... They have two taps, right? On the front desk and on the main? Do not smack nonsense! You’ll look smarter ...

[kit88]

Three.
On each rack.

Yes, three more emergency ones.

[Amborlakatay]

Right! And they are still duplicated, in the center, and the pilot and the navigator on the sides

[Aleks1973]

Quote: Doliva63

And now, perhaps, they do not observe the landing, as before, when they reported from the roof of the "skyscraper": the landing gear was not released?

Actually, not from the roof of a skyscraper, but from a short-range drive.

[Doliva63]

Quote: Alex1973

Quote: Doliva63

And now, perhaps, they do not observe the landing, as before, when they reported from the roof of the "skyscraper": the landing gear was not released?

Actually, not from the roof of a skyscraper, but from a short-range drive.

Apparently, where how. In the north, this was done from the roof of a high-rise building, and from the south, land at the level of the butt.

[75 Sergey]

Well done, almost on time he reacted, clearly gave the command, without panic.
Professional!

[Aleks1973]

Quote: shura7782

And this one has a tank under his belly

This is not a tank. It’s hard to see, but either the UPAZ or the REB container ... Tanks of 2000 x are probably already alive and they don’t look like that ..

[bober1982]

The rear landing gear on the Su-24, as indicated in this news, does not exist. You can not read further.

[Tusv]

Well, okay. The dispatcher saw that the counter did not open and sent it to the second round, while speaking at Maximal. All is correct. Car and Pilot with Navigator alive

[Kelwin]

Well, the reaction of the pilot, half a second from the team. At 0:31, you can see the touch of the strip and immediately exit. Iron people.

[Dikson]

A mess in such a part or what? The observer on flights where looked, to telephone operators under skirts? When installing the racks in the locks, the lights light up .. - THREE fires should be .. did the pilots also not look at the dashboard? There is an indication .. Well, if there is a malfunction on the board .. - okay, but on the ground, where did you look at the moment the car entered the landing ?! Happiness that did not ditch the car and crew ..

[lvov_aleksey]

but I do not see the video

[bober1982]

Most of all, in this whole story with a not entirely successful landing approach, with what simplicity all this cinema becomes publicly available to all, such filming and viewing should be, at a minimum, for official use.

[vavla]

I don’t understand that in the Russian army haven’t there been any secrets anymore?
The flight director’s point of the military aviation unit records, and then all the video and audio materials
spread in public resources! Is that normal!? I am absolutely sincerely asking this question, can I misunderstand something, or nothing at all? Who knows, clarify!

[Kushka]

Once I read that a cadet got into such a situation and very clearly went into the set from a minimum height
over takeoff, for which he was awarded