Palestinian state without army and air defense: details of “deal of the century” published


In the photo - soldiers of the Israeli army


Details of the so-called "deal of the century" appeared in the Israeli press. This is an American proposal to resolve the Palestinian-Israeli crisis.

The publication "Ediot Ahronot" writes that the preliminary period before the introduction of the "deal of the century" will be about 4 years. During this time, representatives of the Palestinian leadership “must agree”, and Israel “will be able to continue building housing in existing Jewish settlements, but without beginning the implementation of new settlement projects.”

Based on the "deal of the century", up to 40 percent of the territory of the regions of Judea and Samaria will go to Israel, 40% - to Palestine. However, there is no exact data on what will happen to the rest of the territories of these regions. The author in the Israeli media notes that ultimately, "they can move to a future Palestinian state."

After the transition period, the Palestinian authorities will be able to declare the creation of the state. At the same time, the Palestinian state will be deprived of the right to have its own army, the right to control its airspace - that is, with a complete ban on its own air defense. Border points, based on the transaction, the Arabs also will not be able to control. The United States believes that Palestine will have to transfer this right to Israel.

This already has its own oddity: what does it mean to transfer border points under complete control to a neighboring state (and even with which at the moment there is actually a long-standing war)?

Additionally, the “deal of the century” prescribes a ban for Palestine to enter into military alliances with anyone.

It is also noted that a tunnel will be dug between Gaza and another part of the future Palestinian state.

A few more points:
The complete disarmament of Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza; dismantling of 60 outposts, which are currently home to about 3000 Israeli settlers; Jerusalem will be the capital of Israel, but the management of holy places in this city should be joint.

Palestine, if approved, will receive $ 50 billion in direct investment.

Ediot Aharonot writes that only if Israel accepts the deal will Trump “allow Israel to annex the Jordan Valley.”

Recall that one of the main ideologists of the "deal of the century" is the son-in-law of the American president Jared Kushner.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

143 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 501Legion 26 January 2020 13: 22 New
    • 24
    • 3
    +21
    funny to read the Palestinians will not go for it, they were cut down everywhere and the Jews are luxurious.
    1. Zoldat_A 26 January 2020 13: 42 New
      • 13
      • 10
      +3
      Quote: 501Legion
      funny to read

      The title of the publication is speaking
      Idiot

      All said laughing
      1. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 13: 47 New
        • 14
        • 10
        +4
        Hebrew idiot - Izvestia laughing
        1. Zoldat_A 26 January 2020 13: 54 New
          • 25
          • 5
          +20
          Quote: Krasnodar
          Hebrew idiot - Izvestia laughing

          I don’t know how in Hebrew - I read in Russian. Maybe in the language of some Papuans from Oceania - and “Russia” sounds somehow indecent. I completely admit.
          1. Shurik70 26 January 2020 14: 41 New
            • 8
            • 4
            +4
            Quote: 501Legion
            funny to read the Palestinians will not go for it, they were cut down everywhere and the Jews are luxurious.

            For $ 50 billion, given that 99% will settle in private accounts?
            Run skipping.
            Only Israel will not do this. Because he understands perfectly well that money is being stolen.
            And surely there is (most likely from the Palestinians, but maybe a Jew) that will commit a terrorist attack, the victims will strike back, they will be answered for that ...
            And everything will return as it was.
            Israel will not dismantle the wall and posts. Maximum - agree to the tunnel to Gaza.
            1. Amin_vivec 26 January 2020 22: 19 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              A 35-40 km tunnel is not cheap at all. $ 50 billion will go to him. They also will not finish building, and should remain.
              1. Shurik70 26 January 2020 22: 35 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                He will not be made using Metrostroy technology. The main thing for Jews is not to get out of this tunnel in Israel. Where it will pass is almost entirely farmland. So they dig a moat, concrete the walls, make a ceiling, and cover it with earth. Inside the hidden cameras, they will set up ventilation with lighting.
                Cheap, fast, reliable.
          2. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 14: 52 New
            • 15
            • 4
            +11
            I grew up where it is customary to know two, preferably three languages. Although - there were jokes. The writing in Hebrew is the top (of a triangle, for example), the expired (check) - fuck in Hebrew. The Arab Fog - up, consonant with the British pronunciation of the familiar English curse, etc. )))
            1. Nikolaevich I 26 January 2020 15: 38 New
              • 12
              • 0
              +12
              Quote: Krasnodar
              past due (check) - come on in Hebrew.

              I really liked your comment! Indeed, in the Russian language there are already many borrowings! Now one can always say on legal grounds like this: “Listen, this check is already past due! Fuck with him!” ... (Attention! Attention! To everyone, everyone! It’s in Hebrew that I say innocuous concepts ... no “indecency”! ) no
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Magog 27 January 2020 11: 39 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Yesterday, passing by the town of Lukhovitsy, I saw a road sign with the name of the river: "Vobdya"! This is obviously a Russian name.
                1. Magog 27 January 2020 13: 05 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Sorry, "grace": the river VOBLA! (Deleting a comment fails.)
                2. Krasnodar 27 January 2020 14: 37 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  In the Krasnodar Territory, a bunch of free names - you go, signs - Dry Slit, Bzhid, Agoy laughing
            2. zoland 27 January 2020 13: 10 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Not overdue, but delayed
              1. Krasnodar 27 January 2020 14: 38 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Delayed, absolutely true. Better write, as in Arabic my brother))
        2. Nyrobsky 26 January 2020 14: 48 New
          • 23
          • 1
          +22
          Quote: Krasnodar
          Hebrew idiot - Izvestia laughing

          And the "deal of the century" proposed to the Palestinians in Hebrew means "Reservation" yes
          PS- What is it? - The Indians are in the know! Once several ships from Europe moored to their shores and now they have no army, no air defense, no border crossings, no country. request
          1. novel66 26 January 2020 16: 16 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            but the good Indians also fed them a turkey
    2. Ramzaj99 26 January 2020 14: 09 New
      • 26
      • 2
      +24
      It's funny all this ....
      When the Jews squeeze the territory from their neighbors, and with the help of tanks, this is a "transition of territories." The whole world applauds.
      When Russia returns its, moreover peacefully, it is annexation ... The most severe sanctions are from almost everyone.
      In my opinion this world has gone crazy ........
      1. Range 26 January 2020 15: 17 New
        • 6
        • 5
        +1
        No, they consider it all crazy, which you can move as you want. It’s just that these people completely lack conscience and the concept of responsibility, in the hope that they won’t have anything for it. It will not be for the time being, but nobody knows how the card will fall there. It’s just that the “chosen ones” oversee the “exceptional” and seem to even manage, that’s all their cunning.
    3. Krasnoyarsk 26 January 2020 14: 12 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      Quote: 501Legion
      funny to read the Palestinians will not go for it, they were cut down everywhere and the Jews are luxurious.

      Not only did the Jews, when creating the state, cut, with the help of the United Nations, their fellow countrymen more and better, they also now want to grab some kind of share. And then they wonder why they are not loved anywhere.
      1. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 14: 33 New
        • 13
        • 13
        0
        Oh
        They received their land back, thanks to the UN, and got it thanks to the successful repulsion of the aggression of neighboring countries that could not cut them.
        My former companion also does not like me - I had to return the stolen money in a larger amount than I hid laughing
        1. MMX
          MMX 26 January 2020 15: 37 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: Krasnodar
          Oh
          They received their land back, thanks to the UN, and got it thanks to the successful repulsion of the aggression of neighboring countries that could not cut them.
          My former companion also does not like me - I had to return the stolen money in a larger amount than I hid laughing


          Their land was not there.

          P.S. "Deal of the Century" is utter nonsense and peer. A ready-made solution is already there and it is long-standing. You just need to execute it.
          1. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 18: 09 New
            • 8
            • 4
            +4
            Well, yes, Judea and Samaria have nothing to do with the Jews. Pure Arabic name.
            1. MMX
              MMX 27 January 2020 07: 53 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Krasnodar
              Well, yes, Judea and Samaria have nothing to do with the Jews. Pure Arabic name.


              Are there any names around the world. Jews lost statehood (read territory) millennia ago, after which this land belonged to others.
              1. Krasnodar 27 January 2020 08: 04 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Now belongs to them again
                1. MMX
                  MMX 27 January 2020 10: 25 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Krasnodar
                  Now belongs to them again

                  What is it about - "her" she becomes when she took possession of this land. And up to this point, the land is alien.
                  1. Krasnodar 27 January 2020 14: 33 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    If someone squeezed out your house, and you bought it, it becomes yours again)). And if they tried to squeeze it again after that, and you fought back, then all the more
                    1. MMX
                      MMX 28 January 2020 12: 07 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Quote: Krasnodar
                      If someone squeezed out your house, and you bought it, it becomes yours again)). And if they tried to squeeze it again after that, and you fought back, then all the more


                      Yes there all this land was squeezed out to whom not laziness at each other. Therefore, the owners are many lol
                      1. Krasnodar 28 January 2020 12: 27 New
                        • 3
                        • 0
                        +3
                        Now it’s not laziness to the Arabs - but it’s not the owners laughing
                      2. MMX
                        MMX 28 January 2020 16: 15 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Now it’s not laziness to the Arabs - but it’s not the owners laughing


                        The length of time is negligible (to put it mildly) to draw any conclusions.

                        In addition, when they already owned, therefore, they also have the right, it turns out. Well I say, from your logic there are applicants to this land as dirt ...
                      3. Krasnodar 28 January 2020 16: 41 New
                        • 4
                        • 0
                        +4
                        Wait and see
                      4. MMX
                        MMX 28 January 2020 16: 46 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        Quote: Krasnodar
                        Wait and see


                        Yes, I agree.
  2. mikstepanenko 26 January 2020 19: 29 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    They got their land back

    Is it mine? Even from the Bible, this is the land of the Philistines, which the Jews took away with weapons. And the Philistines were a Slavic people.
    1. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 19: 59 New
      • 6
      • 5
      +1
      laughing laughing laughing
      Based on the Bible, this is the land of the Canaanite peoples, to whom the Philistines, a native of Crete, who are closer to the Greeks and have no side to the Slavs, have nothing to do. The Philistines - the Greek transcription of the Hebrew name plishtim - from the word plish - invasion, i.e. colonial occupiers. They were aliens there, like the Jews. And it was 3100-3300 about years ago)).
  • Bukhalov 26 January 2020 17: 14 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    Quote: 501Legion
    funny

    And then they wonder why they are not loved anywhere.

    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    Quote: 501Legion
    funny to read the Palestinians will not go for it, they were cut down everywhere and the Jews are luxurious.

    Not only did the Jews, when creating the state, cut, with the help of the United Nations, their fellow countrymen more and better, they also now want to grab some kind of share. And then they wonder why they are not loved anywhere.

    Your trills from tropical Krasnoyarsk give rise to only one wish: "Maestro, trim the march!" It’s too awesome you fill. Where did the UN come from at the end of the 19th century, when the Jews did not cut the land, but bought it. Officially, the owners have Turkish effendi. And they did not hear about the Palestinian Arabs. Due to their absence. At that time, they were found in Sudan, and Yemen. About the "fertility" of these lands, who only did not speak with horror. Mark Twain for example. Literally: "Scorched, dead, lifeless desert. You can drive dozens of miles and not meet a single living soul. Even
    1. Krasnoyarsk 26 January 2020 18: 03 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Quote: Bukhalov
      Maestro, trim the march! "It’s so painful that you fill it. Where did the UN come from at the end of the 19th century, when the Jews didn’t cut the land, but bought it. Officially.

      = In January 1915, Cabinet member Herbert Samuel presented to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs a memorandum on “The Future of Palestine,” in which he proposed annexing this territory and settling “3 or 4 million European Jews” =
      So you bought the “officially” land of Palestine.
      = "Balfour Declaration." In response to UK support for the creation of a “Jewish home” in Palestine, Jewish Zionist volunteers formed the Jewish Legion, which helped British troops conquer Palestine. =
      And so, too, you “officially” bought the land of Palestine.
      = The growth of Jewish immigration to Palestine has led to an increase in Arab nationalism and a deterioration in relations between Arabs and Jews. =
      = At the same time, with the same document, Britain refused the promises regarding Arabs set forth in the correspondence of McMahon-Hussein (English) of 1915, which provided for an independent Arab state within its "natural borders", including, in the opinion of the Arabs, including all of Palestine [45]. =
      = During the Mandate, Jews never made up the majority of the population of Palestine, but their numbers increased significantly, for example, in 1920 the Arabs accounted for an absolute majority (90%), and by 1947, Jews made up 31% of the population [57].
      For 1943, 49% of urban and rural buildings and 12% of cultivable land (arable land and perennial plantations) belonged to Jews in the territory of the British Mandate in Palestine [58]. About half of the land was state-owned, about 47% of the land was owned by Arab and other non-Jewish landowners, and about 6% was owned by Jews. =
      During World War 2, the Germans exterminated the Jews (Holocaust), of course, having previously robbed them. Undetermined were driven to camps and ghettos. After the war, the surviving Jews moved to Palestine and bought land from the Arabs. Where did the robbed fascists and their accomplices of the Jews get the currency to buy land?
      = The United Nations at the Second Session of its General Assembly on November 29, 1947 adopted a partition plan for Palestine (UN General Assembly Resolution No. 181).
      According to this plan, Jerusalem was to become an international city (corpus separatum) under the leadership of the United Nations in order to prevent a conflict over its status. It was also intended to introduce such neighboring settlements as Jerusalem, Shufat, Ein Karem and Bethlehem into Jerusalem. =
      And what happens after? Where a silent glanders, where with the help of weapons the Jews more and more seize the Arab lands.
      Quote: Bukhalov
      It’s too awesome you fill.

      So which of us is "flooding"?
      1. borberd 26 January 2020 21: 54 New
        • 1
        • 5
        -4
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk

        So which of us is "flooding"?


        You contradict yourself. In the same post you declare that the Jews did not buy land, and then provide evidence that Jews bought 49% of the urban land and 12% of arable land. Do not copy-paste from this source anymore. After all, they write nonsense, but you retype it without reading.
        The Jews who survived and were robbed after the Holocaust did not buy land in Palestine, they were bought by Jewish and Christian foundations from America, philanthropists like Baron Rothschild.
    2. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 18: 12 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Why, in Scheme there was an Arab majority - the Natasha family - such a surname))
      Arab merchants and fishermen lived in Jaffa, also in Gaza
  • Vitaly gusin 26 January 2020 17: 53 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    Not only did the Jews, when creating the state, cut, with the help of the UN, more and better zemstvos,

    And let's see

    Look at the left map,
    From Ber Sheva down was a bare desert
    The isthmuses that can be cut and there is no Israel, the coastal strip is sands,
    But the Jewish people for centuries dreamed of returning to their land, and all this did not stop him from turning this land into a blooming garden.
    1. Krasnoyarsk 26 January 2020 18: 52 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
      Look at the left map,

      And why only to the left? I looked at the left and the right and compared how much is on the left red and how much on the right is red. This only confirms my words - where a quiet glanders, where by force of arms the Jews occupy Arab lands. Will you argue?
      How many Palestinians were killed by the Israelis
      Quote: Vitaly Gusin
      turn this land into a blooming garden.
      ?
      1. Vitaly gusin 26 January 2020 19: 04 New
        • 1
        • 5
        -4
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        And why only to the left? I looked at the left and the right and compared,

        I answered only about bad land
        About the central and right I wrote earlier
        But for you personally
        1948 The war for non-dependence was lost, LOST (you will find historical examples yourself)
        1967 asked for war, got lost, LOST (you will find historical examples yourself)
        1973 attacked, lost, LOST (you will find historical examples yourself)
        Who concluded a peace treaty received back. And the rest do not want peace.
        1. Krasnoyarsk 26 January 2020 19: 09 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          Quote: Vitaly Gusin
          And the rest do not want peace.

          Okay. I will take your house from you, and then I will say - let's make peace. At the same time, there is no question of returning home.
          1. Vitaly gusin 26 January 2020 19: 59 New
            • 3
            • 4
            -1
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            . I will take your house from you, and then I will say - let's make peace

            Provided that я I will come to pick up YOUR HOME
            1. Krasnoyarsk 27 January 2020 10: 45 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Vitaly Gusin
              Provided that I come to pick up YOUR HOUSE

              You will not come, you have already come and taken away. Where by cunning, where by bribery, where by force. And then you are still surprised that nobody wants to put up with you.
              Not only that, you also point a finger - he doesn’t want to put up, what have I got to do with it?
              1. Vitaly gusin 27 January 2020 15: 46 New
                • 0
                • 2
                -2
                Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                You will not come, you have already come and taken away

                You either do not really own the information or is it your main business to distort reality.
                And I decided to write, for some reason you don’t want UNDERSTAND
                As everyone knows in 1948, the UN plan for the partition of Palestine provided for the termination of the British Mandate in Palestine and the creation on its territory two unnamed states: Jewish and Arab.
                14 May 1948 gode, on the day of the end of the Mandate, the independence of the State of Israel was proclaimed, and 15 May regular army units seven LAS countries Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Transjordan attacked Israel, invaded Palestine in order to destroy the new Jewish state and create in Palestine "A single Arab state entity"
                Azzam Pasha, Secretary General of the League of Arab States: “It will be a war of extermination followed by a massacre, which will be said to resemble the Mongolian massacre and the Crusades.”
                I hope you will not argue with this fact?
                As a result, the Wars of Independence and West Jerusalem were occupied by Jews and annexed to the State of Israel.
                Judea and Samaria were occupied and unilaterally annexed by Transjordan (Jordan after their annexation in 1950, which gave them the name "West Bank" to distinguish it from the east bank - its territory before the war.
                Jordanian unilateral annexation has been condemned by many countries, including most members of the League of Arab States. USSR recognized the legality of annexation
                From the point of view of international law, the West Bank was under Jordanian occupation. From this territory were expelled ALL Jews and all synagogues are destroyed. The UN has not even considered this.
                Egyptian President Nasser did not turn to Israel at the UN and the USSR to begin negotiations, but turned for military help, and when he was armed before the TEETH, he made the following statement:"When we enter Palestine, its land will not be covered with sand, it will be saturated with blood. Our national task is to destroy Israel."
                But this was not enough for him and added:
                “Our main goal will be the destruction of Israel. Arab peoples WANT TO FIGHT We will not agree to any coexistence with Israel.
                In 1967, during the Six Day War, the area of ​​Judea and Samaria was occupied by Israel.
                WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
                For centuries, a loser, always losing something.
                In 1618, a truce was signed between the Russians and the Poles, according to which Russia lost Smolensk.
                1654 - 1667 - The Russian-Polish war. Russians and Cossacks won a victory over the Poles. The result of the war - Smolensk and all the lands lost in troubled times, Left-Bank Ukraine and Kiev went to Russia.
                1722 - 1723 - Russian-Persian war. He won the confrontation between Persia and Russia. . Thanks to this, the state received the Caspian lands with the cities of Derbent, Baku, and Rasht.
                Well, about a closer time, I will not write.
                Today, no one will negotiate with Palestinian leaders until this item is removed from the Palestinian Charter
                “Paragraph 9. Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine and, therefore, is a strategy, not a tactic. The people of Palestine reaffirm their firm intention to resolutely and steadily continue the armed struggle for the liberation of their homeland."
                Please, no slogans.
                If there are FACTS, I am ready to read them.
                1. Krasnoyarsk 27 January 2020 17: 44 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                  independence of the State of Israel, and on May 15, regular units of the armies of seven LAS countries Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Transjordan attacked Israel, invaded Palestine in order to destroy the new Jewish state and create a “single Arab state formation” in Palestine

                  You offer me to provide some facts. From my point of view, this is pointless. Anyway until then. until you understand the meaning of the expression - a causal relationship.
                  The "invasion" of the troops of the countries you listed in Palestine is a consequence. And try to figure out the reasons yourself, without deceiving yourself.
                  And it will be easy for you to do this if you introduce yourself as a Palestinian for a while.
                  1. Vitaly gusin 27 January 2020 19: 55 New
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    -2
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    You yourself, for a while, imagine a Palestinian.

                    Until 1948, all who lived in Palestine were Jews and ARABS !!!!!! called the Palestinians. Golda Meir declared "I am Palestinian" in 1970,
                    YOU did not carefully read what happened in HISTORY.
                    And YOUR Wishlist came from the USSR. And as you know, they will disappear with him.
                    The policy of CONTEMPORARY RUSSIA is very different, and this YOU could see at a speech by Vladimir Putin in Jerusalem.

                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    The "invasion" of the troops of the countries you listed in Palestine is a consequence. And try to figure out the reasons yourself, without deceiving yourself.

                    May 14, 1948, the day the Mandate ended proclaimed the independence of the State of Israel, and on May 15, regular units of the armies of seven LAS countries Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Transjordan attacked Israel, invaded Palestine to destroy a new Jewish state and creation in Palestine
                    without deceiving yourself
                    And others!
                  2. Krasnoyarsk 27 January 2020 20: 41 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                    called the Palestinians. Golda Meir declared "I am Palestinian" in 1970,

                    And what follows from this?
                    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                    And YOUR Wishlist came from the USSR.

                    What are you talking about?
                    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                    The policy of CONTEMPORARY RUSSIA is very different, and this YOU could see at a speech by Vladimir Putin in Jerusalem.

                    Does this somehow explain the reason for the attack of 7 countries on Israel in 1948?
                    Quote: Vitaly Gusin

                    without deceiving yourself
                    And others!

                    First of all, you are fooling yourself by pretending with purely Jewish spontaneity that you did not understand my question - for what reasons did the 7 countries come together to destroy Israel?
                    Israel has just been created, or rather, only announced its creation, i.e. he did not have time, like a state, to do nasty things to neighbors, and yet his neighbors attacked him. Why? If you say - oh, so simple - I won’t believe it. And no one will believe.
                    So why did they attack? Well? How is the spirit, or is the gut thin?
                  3. Vitaly gusin 27 January 2020 21: 53 New
                    • 0
                    • 3
                    -3
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    yet the neighbors attacked him. Why?

                    Azzam Pasha, Secretary General of the League of Arab States 1948: “It will be a war of extermination followed by a massacre, which will be said to resemble the Mongolian massacre and the Crusades.”
                    Egyptian President Nasser “When we enter Palestine, its land will not be covered with sand, it will be saturated with blood. Our national task is to destroy Israel.” “Our main goal will be the destruction of Israel. Arab peoples WANT TO FIGHT We will not agree to any coexistence with Israel.

                    "Paragraph 9. Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine and therefore strategy, not tactics. The people of Palestine reaffirm their firm intention to resolutely and steadily continue the armed struggle for the liberation of their homeland. "
                    Please give ת such statements by the leaders of Israel.
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    What are you talking about?

                    I assume that you were born after the collapse of the USSR
                    HERE ABOUT THIS


                    LEARN HISTORY!
                  4. Krasnoyarsk 27 January 2020 22: 19 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
                    Please give ת such statements by the leaders of Israel.

                    Sorry, are you dumb? I asked a simple question three times already and all three times you answer in the style of BLA-BLA-BLA.
                    Therefore, allow me to take my leave. hi
                  5. Vitaly gusin 27 January 2020 23: 31 New
                    • 0
                    • 1
                    -1
                    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
                    You answer in the style of BLA-BLA-BLA.

                    HERE THIS APPLIES TO YOU
                    I have facts!
                    And YOU BLA-BLA-BLA tongue
  • Vitaly gusin 26 January 2020 19: 18 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    How many Palestinians were killed by the Israelis,

    http://ru.danielpipes.org/5778/lyudskie-poteri-v-arabo-izrailskih-konfliktah
  • Sgan 27 January 2020 10: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And the Palestinians will not agree to any agreement, he will not agree to recognize Israel within any borders and they also do not need their own state. The only possibility of a peace agreement is to negotiate with the Arab countries, and the Palestinian territories will become part of Jordan (this was until 1967)
  • DRM
    DRM 27 January 2020 15: 20 New
    • 0
    • 3
    -3
    Quote: 501Legion
    funny to read the Palestinians will not go for it, they were cut down everywhere and the Jews are luxurious.

    Palestinians would have long agreed, Iran would not.
  • Sergey Medvedev 26 January 2020 13: 23 New
    • 12
    • 0
    +12
    Under such conditions, this is never a state, rather autonomy. In fact, it may be a reservation.
  • Pereira 26 January 2020 13: 24 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    How will this differ from the existing state system, except for the surrender of the Palestinians in exchange for a promise of money?
    1. Zoldat_A 26 January 2020 13: 44 New
      • 3
      • 3
      0
      Quote: Pereira
      the surrender of the Palestinians in exchange for a promise of money

      Bite on the loot-there is no Palestine.

      It’s normal American practice to print green papers.
      1. Vasyan1971 26 January 2020 15: 37 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        It’s normal American practice to print green papers.

        Everything was invented a long time ago:
        There is no fortress that a donkey loaded with gold could not take.
        ©
        1. Zoldat_A 26 January 2020 15: 54 New
          • 2
          • 4
          -2
          Quote: Vasyan1971
          There is no fortress that a donkey loaded with gold could not take.

          As I myself did not think of this quote! Basil, bravo and my applause! good drinks
      2. Oyo Sarkazmi 26 January 2020 15: 51 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        Bite on the loot-there is no Palestine.

        They would have accepted Judaism long ago, and in general there would have been no problems.
        After all, their ancestors were Jews from the 6th century. BC. 1 in. AD, then were Christians in the 6th century. BC, then became Muslims. And the difference is only in the prophets-agitators. Moses, Isa, and Magomed. The rest is the nuances ...
        1. Zoldat_A 26 January 2020 15: 56 New
          • 2
          • 7
          -5
          Quote: Oyo Sarkazmi
          Quote: Zoldat_A
          Bite on the loot-there is no Palestine.

          They would have accepted Judaism long ago, and in general there would have been no problems.
          After all, their ancestors were Jews from the 6th century. BC. 1 in. AD, then were Christians in the 6th century. BC, then became Muslims. And the difference is only in the prophets-agitators. Moses, Isa, and Magomed. The rest is the nuances ...

          Genetically - one people. And they’ve been beating all their lives, as in J. Swift’s, “pointed and blunt-pointed”
          1. Zoldat_A 26 January 2020 16: 28 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Genetically - one people. And they’ve been beating all their lives, as in J. Swift’s, “pointed and blunt-pointed”

            Who stupidly put a "minus"? Justify what I'm wrong with?

            Or you nevermind - Cho wouldn’t say - “Russian soldier” means “minus”.
            I’m going to disappoint you - I don’t have any “minuses” for a long time, and stupidly “minus”, expressing my disapproval to the comment - stupidly.
            1. Zoldat_A 27 January 2020 09: 35 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              you nevermind - cho would not say - "Russian soldier" - means "minus".

              As required to prove -

              I even like it - as a child, I so infuriated the neighbor's shepherd with a piece of sugar.

              If Russia does something right, the whole world does not like Russia.
              If there is at least one that quietly hates me, encrypted, maybe I said something right?
            2. Oyo Sarkazmi 27 January 2020 10: 59 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Who stupidly put a "minus"? Justify what I'm wrong with?
              Don’t pay attention. Jewish Nationalism - Hitler Resting ...
        2. bobba94 26 January 2020 16: 39 New
          • 4
          • 3
          +1
          My friend, he is a Jew by father and mother, a big joker and says so - there were many tribes in the Middle East in those days, they were called differently, but they were all Semites. One small tribe was lucky, Jesus was born in their tribe, and from that it all started ...... and they isolated themselves, and became proud and all that jazz
          1. Zoldat_A 27 January 2020 05: 12 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: bobba94
            My friend, he is a Jew by father and mother, a big joker and says so - there were many tribes in the Middle East in those days, they were called differently, but they were all Semites. One small tribe was lucky, Jesus was born in their tribe, and from that it all started ...... and they isolated themselves, and became proud and all that jazz

            The whole history of the Middle East conflicts in three sentences.

            good
          2. Oyo Sarkazmi 27 January 2020 11: 03 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            One small tribe was lucky, Jesus was born in their tribe, and that was how it all began.
            If you read the Bible carefully, Isa was a Jewish ultranationalist. What did he say to a non-Jewish woman when she asked her child to be cured? Helping non-Jews is to take the child’s bread and throw it to the dog.
      3. The comment was deleted.
    2. Range 26 January 2020 15: 25 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      So far, striped humpbacks have been able to buy other countries or their elites, with the exception of a couple of countries around the globe.
  • antivirus 26 January 2020 13: 27 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    and here they come - three thieves and a camel, fourth week
    70 years agree ... last time
    1. Zoldat_A 26 January 2020 13: 46 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Quote: antivirus
      and here they come - three thieves and a camel, fourth week
      70 years agree ... last time

      Are the camels being raped on schedule or is America the first one?
      1. novel66 26 January 2020 16: 17 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        according to the ditty
        "a camel stands on a mountain
        his four ... "
        enough for everyone
  • knn54 26 January 2020 13: 33 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    He recalled the CLASSIC: “Or maybe you can give me the key to the apartment where the money is?”
  • Nikolay87 26 January 2020 13: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Briefly: they are trying to buy state for $ 50 billion. Great plan good laughing
    1. Pereira 26 January 2020 13: 43 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Even if this happens, I’m ready to argue, the Jews will squeeze out the money. At least for the arrangement of the border and digging the tunnel.
  • KVU-NSVD 26 January 2020 13: 35 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The essence of the transaction is to give up and become a “full” reservation for 50 lards ... then ... for sure ... But nevertheless, progress, before you bought islands for beads, but here they pay at least money .. well, they pay ... they promise .. a good deal, profitable ... for Israel ...
    1. Mountain shooter 26 January 2020 14: 53 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      "full" reservation for 50 lard

      The amount is not small. It is unlikely that there are more than 5 million Palestinians. This is 10 kilobaks per nose !!!! Their families are large. Decent money in any country in the world ...
      1. KVU-NSVD 26 January 2020 14: 58 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        "full" reservation for 50 lard

        The amount is not small. It is unlikely that there are more than 5 million Palestinians. This is 10 kilobaks per nose !!!! Their families are large. Decent money in any country in the world ...

        Well, nothing shines for the Palestinians “with large families”. Even if the "authors of the deals of the century" are crazy and crazy, then everything will be resolved by bank transfer using the cream of the local political monopoly with smooth flowing into offshore ..
      2. Oyo Sarkazmi 26 January 2020 15: 55 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        It is unlikely that there are more than 5 million Palestinians. This is 10 kilobaks per nose !!!!

        Well, to Palestine the EU rolls off annually 500 million. Turkey a hundred. CA is almost a billion. So officials and wrestlers even have enough for the gilded Roll Royces. And the people on strawberries knock down their 10 thousand bucks. No herbicides. Very much appreciated in Europe.
  • maden.usmanow 26 January 2020 13: 41 New
    • 3
    • 11
    -8
    Are there any other options?
    Why does Palestine need an army, and especially air defense?
    1. Professor 26 January 2020 14: 06 New
      • 13
      • 11
      +2
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      Are there any other options?
      Why does Palestine need an army, and especially air defense?

      There is. For example, send the Fylystyns to the Arab state already formed on the territory of Mandate Palestine. To Jordan. Moreover, 80% of the population there are already Fylistians.
      States without air defense today are full. As well as the states of entry to which other states control. For example, Lesotho.

      However, the Philistines will not make any deals and under no conditions. For them, the PROCESS of creating a state is a business. Very profitable business. As soon as they have their own country, interest in them will be the same as in Lesotho.
      1. Avior 26 January 2020 14: 38 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        For example, send the Fylystyns to the Arab state already formed on the territory of Mandate Palestine.

        actually they were already there. I remember when the locals escorted them, the tanks put on guard of honor
        1. Professor 26 January 2020 14: 53 New
          • 9
          • 6
          +3
          Quote: Avior
          For example, send the Fylystyns to the Arab state already formed on the territory of Mandate Palestine.

          actually they were already there. I remember when the locals escorted them, the tanks put on guard of honor

          For half a century, the Fylystyns have not been able to forget those wires. Mentally, everything was so.
        2. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 18: 59 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Black september
    2. Krasnoyarsk 26 January 2020 14: 16 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      Are there any other options?
      Why does Palestine need an army, and especially air defense?

      Indeed, and why should they even live on earth?
  • sabakina 26 January 2020 13: 54 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    Professor, aka Oleg, will you find 10 differences? wink
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. Orkraider 26 January 2020 17: 32 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              You reproach Russia for responding to an "independent state" with the assassination of its military. And you yourself understand that this is an adequate answer.

              hi
              Dixon
              Understands, but really wants to bite these Russians. Most emigrants have such a funny behavior: they like to teach down and teach life to former fellow citizens. They sit on forums and websites of the former Motherland and teach, teach and teach life, talk about how poorly their country behaves and that "in a democratic world, it’s not accepted to behave like that ..."

              Professor,
              You normally commented earlier, why did you begin to change your communication style?
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. The comment was deleted.
          2. Orkraider 26 January 2020 17: 12 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            You are scared and do not spray with saliva.
            Under item 3. Russian troops were on foreign territory. They were not any peacekeepers since they did not have a corresponding mandate.


            How cool are you lying!
            Brazenly and shamelessly ...
            The mandate of the Russian peacekeepers was:
            The resolution, co-sponsored by Russia, was adopted unanimously on Monday at a meeting of the UN Security Council. Together with Russian diplomats, their colleagues from France, Germany, Slovakia, the UK and the USA worked on the document. The main outcome of yesterday's meeting was the extension of the mandate of the UN observation mission in Georgia for another six months - until April 15, 2008.
            The Security Council thus gave a negative answer to Georgia’s request for the replacement of Russian forces with international forces.

            Georgia is recommended to ensure the freedom of movement of Russian peacekeepers, their "stabilizing role" is noted.

            Resolution from the UN Security Council October 13, 2006
            On this, regarding the presence of the Russian peacekeepers legally - please do not write an explicit lie.

            Who first started shooting is also well known.


            Yes, this is well known. To discuss with you about this is simply stupid.

            Let’s suppose that your patrol will be destroyed completely, and it will be known that this was done by the Iranian unit, which was then relocated and located in the territory of another country, legally and by invitation. You want to say that Israel will not strike a retaliation, right?
            Or do you think that only you have the right to give an answer for the lives of your citizens and soldiers?
            1. Professor 26 January 2020 18: 47 New
              • 3
              • 6
              -3
              Quote: Orkraider
              How cool are you lying!
              Brazenly and shamelessly ...
              The mandate of the Russian peacekeepers was:
              The resolution, co-sponsored by Russia, was adopted unanimously on Monday at a meeting of the UN Security Council. Together with Russian diplomats, their colleagues from France, Germany, Slovakia, the UK and the USA worked on the document. The main result of yesterday’s meeting was the extension of the mandate of the UN observation mission in Georgia for another six months - until 15 April 2008.
              The Security Council thus gave a negative answer to Georgia’s request for the replacement of Russian forces with international forces.

              There was a mandate and floated away. You yourself wrote when this happened. On 8.8.8 there was no mandate, respectively, no "peacekeepers" either. Learn the materiel.

              Quote: Orkraider
              Resolution from the UN Security Council October 13, 2006
              On this, regarding the presence of the Russian peacekeepers legally - please do not write an explicit lie.

              At 8.8.8 there was no mandate. Moreover, George demanded that Russian troops leave the sovereign territory of Georgia.

              Quote: Orkraider
              Yes, this is well known. To discuss with you about this is simply stupid.

              Of course it's stupid. Indeed, for this you need to have knowledge. For example, that on the eve of 8.8.8 Tbilisi officially complained about the shelling of their villages. Do you get it? They didn’t complain about them, but they complained.

              Quote: Orkraider
              Let’s suppose that your patrol will be destroyed completely, and it will be known that this was done by the Iranian unit, which was then relocated and located in the territory of another country, legally and by invitation. You want to say that Israel will not strike a retaliation, right?

              Our patrol in the territory of a neighboring state with which we are not at war? We then just apologize and will not send patrols there anymore.

              Quote: Orkraider
              Or do you think that only you have the right to give an answer for the lives of your citizens and soldiers?

              Only those countries with whom we are at war. We do not strike at Egypt and Jordan no matter what.
              1. Orkraider 26 January 2020 20: 11 New
                • 5
                • 2
                +3
                There was a mandate and floated away.

                Already better, admit that he was.
                And what about UN Security Council Resolution 1808?
                The United Nations Security Council adopted resolution 1808 late Tuesday, extending for another six months - until October 2008 - the mandate of UN peacekeepers in the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict zone (UNMIH).

                You are wrong, and strong.

                Our patrol in the territory of a neighboring state with which we are not at war? We then just apologize and will not send patrols there anymore.

                Very thick. That is, if your soldiers are destroyed over foreign territory - you just apologize? Haha
                Funny.

                Only those countries with whom we are at war. We do not strike at Egypt and Jordan no matter what.


                Operation Entebbe.
                You have not violated even state borders and received permission to cross them with your armed forces? Do not violate the sovereignty of Uganda? Not?
                Sure?!

                About the essence of the operation is not necessary, I approve of the action of your government, but what you blame us above, you trampled much more seriously.
                1. Professor 26 January 2020 21: 16 New
                  • 3
                  • 4
                  -1
                  Quote: Orkraider
                  Already better, admit that he was.

                  There was no mandate 8.8.8.

                  Quote: Orkraider
                  And what about UN Security Council Resolution 1808?
                  The United Nations Security Council adopted resolution 1808 late Tuesday, extending for another six months - until October 2008 - the mandate of UN peacekeepers in the GeorgianAbkhazian Conflict (UNOMIG).

                  I will say that Abkhazia and Ossetia are not the same thing. Did you not know?

                  Quote: Orkraider
                  Very thick. That is, if your soldiers are destroyed over foreign territory - you just apologize? Haha

                  Our soldiers returned to their territory. Let yours do the same.

                  Quote: Orkraider
                  Operation Entebbe.
                  You have not violated even state borders and received permission to cross them with your armed forces? Do not violate the sovereignty of Uganda? Not?
                  Sure?!

                  Operation Entebbe? No, I have not heard. I heard about Operation Yoni. Are you talking about the release of hostages from a plane hijacked by terrorists? And what hostages did your soldiers release in Georgia and whom are they still releasing there?

                  Quote: Orkraider
                  About the essence of the operation is not necessary, I approve of the action of your government, but what you blame us above, you trampled much more seriously.

                  Did we squeeze out part of the territory of Uganda or were we already at home within XNUMX hours? Do the same. Come back home.
                  1. Orkraider 26 January 2020 21: 31 New
                    • 6
                    • 0
                    +6
                    Georgia introduced its forces into the JPKF responsibility zone closed to them by the Dagomys Agreements and attacked Russian peacekeepers. See article 3, paragraph d, of the Definition of Aggression of the UN General Assembly-1974 (resolution 3314): “Attack by the armed forces of a state on land, sea or air forces, or sea and air fleets of another state”.
                    Point.

                    Did we squeeze out part of the territory of Uganda or were we already at home within XNUMX hours? Do the same. Come back home.


                    Have we squeezed out that part of Georgia where our soldiers were when the Georgians were forced to peace? And we were near Tbilisi .. No, we came back.
                    Do the same!
                    Come back home.
                    When will you return the captured Golan?
                2. Moskovit 27 January 2020 00: 49 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  Yes, it is useless. You tell him about Thomas, he tells you about Yerema. Suffering from Russophobia, the Nazi never has a meal. Moreover, immigrants always want to be more correct than local ones. And Israel will have to always poke around in this Palestinian hemorrhoids. Whatever plans anyone suggests. They do not want and cannot integrate to themselves. Give full independence too. And the Arabs on the terms of ultimatums do not want to talk. If the Israeli Arabs are forever against their state, so talk about strangers.
                  1. 3danimal 27 January 2020 02: 28 New
                    • 0
                    • 2
                    -2
                    Stop stop. And where is Nazism? Is there criticism of the actions of state structures (the army in particular), if it is inconvenient - then, by definition, Russophobic? Convenient demagogic position.
                    1. Moskovit 27 January 2020 05: 33 New
                      • 1
                      • 1
                      0
                      Criticism is useful if it is objective. And when she slides to the fact that the Russian soldier is good for nothing but to work on a column-free column, and the Israeli, on the contrary, study at universities, what is it? It’s a pity they erased the opus in which he finally uncovered. Yes, actually it did not surprise anyone.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Azis 26 January 2020 19: 17 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Dikson (Eugene)
          guy with a machine gun
          He is alive. https://kaspyinfo.ru/s-kazahskogo-kamennyj-mech-pulemjotchik-iz-astrahani-ostanovil-voennuju-kolonnu-i-stal-legendoj/
          1. Orkraider 27 January 2020 09: 52 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            hi
            This is good, thanks for the link.
      2. Oyo Sarkazmi 26 January 2020 15: 44 New
        • 7
        • 5
        +2
        Quote: Professor
        1. Some on their territory, others on someone else's.

        Yes, only one is against cannibals, and three are cannibals.
        1. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 19: 08 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          Why cannibals? laughing
          1. Oyo Sarkazmi 27 January 2020 11: 10 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Well, how would they be with the United States in one bundle. But since links to pictures from Abu Ghraib are removed, I will say in words: “The third president is the executioner in the USA: Bush was a secret executioner, Obama is a shy executioner, Trump is a proud executioner. Since torture and extrajudicial executions - they have a constant practice.
            1. Krasnodar 27 January 2020 14: 35 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              So it is from the late 60s. The Soviet Union sent troops for Egypt, Amers began to support Israel, which until the mid-50s was pro-Soviet, right down to culture.
              1. Oyo Sarkazmi 27 January 2020 20: 44 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Well yes. Until 1953, at the May Day demonstrations in Tel Aviv, they walked with portraits of Stalin. For he broke, contrary to Churchill, the creation of Israel, and even allowed the delivery of "mules" - the Czech Me-109.
                But this does not change the present. Those people are extinct. And now Israel is the master of killing all over the world. It does not allow the Palestinian elite to form, which would corrupt Hamas and other parties with its corruption.
                1. Krasnodar 28 January 2020 06: 28 New
                  • 3
                  • 0
                  +3
                  Not therefore - just the majority of the population were socialists, the USSR was the flagship of ideology, Stalin was the leader of the country.
                  All the masters in the killings - and the Palestinian elite is more intriguing against each other, has long been formed and is very corrupt, which makes it very attractive to get into its ranks. )))
  • The comment was deleted.
  • nm76 26 January 2020 13: 56 New
    • 7
    • 16
    -9
    And after all, none of the commentators saw the most important thing in this news!
    This is a blow, one might even say in the groin of Russia. The ban on Palestinian air defense is a potential impossibility to sell our S400 and Shell shells.
    With the ban on creating an army - the same situation, we can not sell them Armata and Boomerangs.
    I’m glad that at least not a word about the Palestinian fleet means we’ll sell Varshavyanka, let them swim across the Jordan)))
    1. Mountain shooter 26 January 2020 15: 06 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Quote: nm76
      This is a blow, one might even say in the groin of Russia. The ban on Palestinian air defense is a potential impossibility to sell our S400 and Shell shells.

      Are you seriously? Who is there to sell? Gaza Strip look at the map ...
      1. nm76 26 January 2020 15: 11 New
        • 4
        • 8
        -4
        They will have $ 50.000.000.000 and for that kind of money they can even sell an aircraft carrier)))
        1. Mountain shooter 26 January 2020 15: 14 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          Quote: nm76
          They will have $ 50.000.000.000 and for that kind of money they can even sell an aircraft carrier

          They had SEVERAL lard a year from Saudi Arabia “to fight the Jewish state,” and where are they? In addition to penniless Kalash and RPG? A shelling of Israel are self-made "Kassam" ...
          1. kiril1246 26 January 2020 19: 52 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Mountain Shooter
            A shelling of Israel are self-made "Kassam" ...

            Outdated information. Palestinians long ago have Grads and Iranian Fajers and Zalzili.
            1. Pereira 26 January 2020 21: 50 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Good news. Thanks.
    2. kiril1246 26 January 2020 19: 51 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      Quote: nm76
      And after all, none of the commentators saw the most important thing in this news!
      This is a blow, one might even say in the groin of Russia. The ban on Palestinian air defense is a potential impossibility to sell our S400 and Shell shells.
      With the ban on creating an army - the same situation, we can not sell them Armata and Boomerangs.
      I’m glad that at least not a word about the Palestinian fleet means we’ll sell Varshavyanka, let them swim across the Jordan)))

      You have never sold anything to Palestinians, Syrians, or Egyptians, but only to give.
    3. 3danimal 27 January 2020 02: 30 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      We will not sell, but give in a bad loan. Which is as simple as usual. In between, sending SMS money for the operation to another child, for whom no money was found in the budget.
  • Operator 26 January 2020 14: 05 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    The decision of the UN General Assembly of 1947, repeatedly confirmed by the resolutions of the UN Security Council, including on the part of the United States, established the following borders of the Jewish and Arab states in Palestine, UN mandated territory


    Unified and indivisible Jerusalem was defined as an international zone under the control of the UN.

    Of course, the Palestinians have every right to sell part of their state for $ 50 billion, but only in this case the decisions of the General Assembly and the UN Security Council will lose their legal force.
    1. Professor 26 January 2020 14: 28 New
      • 12
      • 11
      +1
      Again in a puddle? This resolution was advisory in nature and rejected not by Jews, but by Arabs. We are still waiting for them to recognize this resolution.
      1. Mutno 26 January 2020 15: 41 New
        • 7
        • 7
        0
        Quote: Professor
        Again in a puddle? This resolution was advisory in nature and rejected not by Jews, but by Arabs. We are still waiting for them to recognize this resolution.

        And bomb them constantly so that you can feel this UN resolution, etc. negative
        1. Professor 26 January 2020 16: 16 New
          • 7
          • 5
          +2
          Quote: Mutno
          Quote: Professor
          Again in a puddle? This resolution was advisory in nature and rejected not by Jews, but by Arabs. We are still waiting for them to recognize this resolution.

          And bomb them constantly so that you can feel this UN resolution, etc. negative

          "constantly" only in response to an attack on us. We have never been the first to attack anyone.
    2. kiril1246 26 January 2020 19: 53 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Operator
      repeatedly confirmed by UN Security Council resolutions,

      Only the Palestinians did not confirm this plan.
  • paul3390 26 January 2020 14: 16 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    The lands of Palestine should be transferred to Israel, and all Palestinians should be granted American citizenship and transported to America .. I think everyone will agree, except of course America .. But - they wanted the type of peace, here's an option ..
  • rocket757 26 January 2020 14: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    A good deal from the Yankees, who else believes it to be?
    1. Mutno 26 January 2020 15: 44 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Quote: rocket757
      A good deal from the Yankees, who else believes it to be?

      Jews, if only neoliberals .. hi
      1. rocket757 26 January 2020 16: 32 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Mutno
        Jews, if only neoliberals ..

        This is not even discussed, they are simply an integral part of these plans.
      2. Magog 27 January 2020 12: 08 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But these are not the same?
  • businessv 26 January 2020 14: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Recall that one of the main ideologists of the "deal of the century" is the son-in-law of the American president Jared Kushner.
    Oh, well done, you see, a sick soul for Palestine! If minke whales care about foreign territories, then they expect to get good preferences for this! Bismarck also said: if you don’t understand what’s the matter, then it means money!
  • Reserve buildbat 26 January 2020 14: 50 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    I'd like to build our esteemed forum users from Israel: And what kind of publication is it with such a oh ... what talking name? An hour is not an analogue of some kind of "national interest"? It is painfully delusional fiction to give birth.
  • Operator 26 January 2020 14: 56 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Professor
    This resolution was advisory in nature.

    "... ...", - S. Lavrov (C)
  • Mutno 26 January 2020 15: 37 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    Do not believe the USA and Israel! Otherwise, you will completely drown in blood and lose everything, nationality too ..
  • Nikolaevich I 26 January 2020 15: 44 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    I didn’t fully understand: was the Judas silver rate so high or was the US dollar much cheaper? 30 pieces of silver = $ 50 "yards" ... it will be more bitcoin course!
  • Operator 26 January 2020 16: 36 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Trump is likely to refuse his proposal for a Israeli deal with Palestine, as he was largely framed by Jewish informers as part of the impeachment process: US Presidential Administration official Alexander Windman and Ukrainian businessmen Lev Lampas and Igor Fruman.
    1. Krasnodar 26 January 2020 18: 15 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Yes, Edelson, who also sponsored his election, is Kushnir's son-in-law and Jewish grandchildren. Also framed lol
      1. Operator 26 January 2020 19: 19 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Windman, Lampas, and Fruman lowered Kushnir's chores into the toilet.

        This is already becoming a tradition in the Jewish environment - Zelensky is friends with Bandera in a hickey, then the chief rabbi of Poland excuses Polish anti-Semites.
        1. kiril1246 26 January 2020 19: 59 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          Quote: Operator
          the rabbi of Poland otmazyvaet Polish anti-Semites.

          In Soviet times, there was such an anti-Zionist committee that periodically scolded Israel, and it was obvious to everyone that the Jews who were in it were doing so in order to externally demonstrate the loyalty of the anti-Semitic CPSU and not to aggravate the situation of Jews in the USSR even worse. So the rabbi of Poland made some statements there so as not to worsen the situation of the few Jews in Poland. It can be understood.
  • Ratmir_Ryazan 26 January 2020 16: 52 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    At the same time, the Palestinian state will be deprived of the right to have its own army, the right to control its airspace - that is, with a complete ban on its own air defense. Border points, based on the transaction, the Arabs also will not be able to control. The United States believes that Palestine will have to transfer this right to Israel.


    The USA has mixed up, they want to create for the Palestinians not a state, but a RESERVATION.

    I suppose that the Palestinians will refuse and do it right.
  • Falx 26 January 2020 18: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    the "deal" smells very bad, it all resembles exchanging land for beads and other junk. vryatli Palestinians agree.
  • Vitaly gusin 26 January 2020 18: 18 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Yes, relax and do not strain!
    The value of this agreement depends on how you can use the paper on which it will all be stated.
  • Pereira 26 January 2020 20: 07 New
    • 4
    • 4
    0
    professor (Oleg Sokolov) Let them banyat, but you asked for it yourself.
    1. Some on their territory, others on someone else's. /
    Russia on its territory - Georgia since 1801 belongs to Russia, Israel to a stranger.
    2. Some are fighting Islamic terrorism, others are fighting an independent state.
    Israel fights with the defenders of its land, Russia with Islamic and Jewish terrorism.
    3. Some are defending, others have attacked an independent state.
    Israel attacked an independent state, Russia repels aggression against South Ossetia.
    4. Some are armed with non-lethal weapons, while others are lethal.
    Is non-lethal weapon AIDS?
    5. Some are presented completely in the frame, while others are pre-cut from the overall picture in the name of creating fake coolness.
    Yes, it was not worth cutting Palestinians out of the frame.
    6. Some have insignia, others are hiding.
    Palestinians are not hiding. The Israelis cut them out of the frame.
    7. Some do not aim at anyone, others do not know at whom it is aimed.
    Israelis aim at those who were cut out of the frame.
    8. Some Motherland will never forget, others will never remember.
    Yes, we will not forget our heroes. And yours never knew.
    9. For some they will give 1024 enemy prisoners for each, others will be redeemed from captivity by their parents.
    For one prisoner they gave 1024 hostages. And it is right. We must take more prisoner
    10. Some having served will go to study at the university; others, at best, shine the position of a gas station fueler.
    Why, of course, to the gas station? Now Israel produces gas on the shelf. Go to the gas water heater.
  • Leonid Anatolevich 27 January 2020 00: 13 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Nyrobsky
    And the "deal of the century" proposed to the Palestinians in Hebrew means - "Reservation

    Reservation is created for indigenous people. They are the indigenous inhabitants of the earth from the Atlantic to Pakistan, never in the history of Palestine existed for Muslims - this is the European word
    1. Magog 27 January 2020 12: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Indeed, European. In Italy, there is "Palestine". This name probably appeared in Italy after the fourteenth century, when legends about Jesus Christ were transferred here under the name "Pope of Hildebrand". It is believed that the evangelical Christ acts in the PALESTINE (in translation it can mean "White Stan" or "Babylonian Stan").
    2. Magog 27 January 2020 12: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Indeed, European. In Italy, there is "Palestine". This name probably appeared in Italy after the fourteenth century, when the legends of Jesus Christ were transferred here under the name “Papa Hildebrand” (“Burning Gold!” “Son of the Sun”?). It is believed that the evangelical Christ acts in the PALESTINE (in translation it can mean "White Stan" or "Babylonian Stan"). Link: Gregorovius F. “History of the city of Rome in the Middle Ages. From the fifth to the sixteenth century. ” St. Petersburg, 1902-1912.
    3. Magog 27 January 2020 22: 32 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      "Palestine never existed for Muslims in history." That's right, because Muslims stood out from Christianity when this name was already in circulation (biblical). It's about the times of the beginning of the Great Troubles (end of the 16th century). The Europeans came up with the modern "Palestine" and "Palestinians" on the eve of the so-called "The Egyptian Campaign of Napoleon." How did the Muslims get there - ask Napoleon?
  • Leonid Anatolevich 27 January 2020 00: 18 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Pereira
    Georgia belongs to Russia since 1801

    No longer belongs to a long time
  • Leonid Anatolevich 27 January 2020 00: 27 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    How many Palestinians were killed by the Israelis
    turn this land into a blooming garden.

    Less than the conquest of Crimea. The assault on Bakhchisarai by the Russian general Lassi cost more peaceful lives than all the commotion with Muslims of B. Vostok
    1. Magog 27 January 2020 12: 21 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      More specifically: at the beginning of the Crimean campaign of Catherine 2 in the Crimean Khanate, there were about 500 thousand inhabitants, at the end - less than 60 thousand
    2. Magog 27 January 2020 22: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The concept of “Potemkin villages”, that is, “camouflage”, not real housing constructions, etc., has taken root in our language. In fact, these are deserted cities and villages of the southern Black Sea region at the time (1787) of the Empress’s visit there.
  • Shahno 27 January 2020 08: 16 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Quote: MMX
    Quote: Krasnodar
    Well, yes, Judea and Samaria have nothing to do with the Jews. Pure Arabic name.


    Are there any names around the world. Jews lost statehood (read territory) millennia ago, after which this land belonged to others.

    Well, fine, now the Jews (Jews) regained their statehood, read the territory, in a much more peaceful way than before some peoples on this earth ...
  • Magog 27 January 2020 11: 59 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The fake state, like the history of the “God chosen people”, declares its rights not only to exist, but also in territories inhabited by other indigenous peoples. The "Palestinians" were unlucky, unlike the "Mongols." Both those and others were so called in the 19th century.
  • Shahno 27 January 2020 17: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Krasnoyarsk
    Quote: Vitaly Gusin
    independence of the State of Israel, and on May 15, regular units of the armies of seven LAS countries Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Transjordan attacked Israel, invaded Palestine in order to destroy the new Jewish state and create a “single Arab state formation” in Palestine

    You offer me to provide some facts. From my point of view, this is pointless. Anyway until then. until you understand the meaning of the expression - a causal relationship.
    The "invasion" of the troops of the countries you listed in Palestine is a consequence. And try to figure out the reasons yourself, without deceiving yourself.
    And it will be easy for you to do this if you introduce yourself as a Palestinian for a while.

    Assimilation from your point of view can only be Arabic? And so the Jewish one came. Naturally, the Arab (possibly Muslim) administration is against ... This is money. And people are ordinary, ay, people ...
    Yes, it’s not good, for the money to propose an end to the intifad.
    It’s good to send them to support the Palestinian prime minister.