Putin transit: revolution from above

159

Some observers call the January 15 reform a “revolution from above." In some ways this metaphor is true: the reforms announced by President Putin significantly change the configuration of the supreme power, redistribute power between the institutions of the president, the State Duma, the government and the State Council. This is a real separation of powers, which the democrats have always talked about, but our "democrats" are terribly unhappy with this, because they are also pro-Western puppets.

Putin's elite


Vladimir Putin will not be re-elected in 2024, resigns as president, but will continue to lead the “Putin elite” under the new president of Russia, and the latter infuriates our pro-Western party and other “all-proverbs”: their spells about the collapse of Russia have disappeared again. Putin leaves and remains at the same time!



To understand how great Putin’s Russia’s stability is, just look at a neighboring pro-European country, with which the population has been scampering for jobs throughout Europe for several years, but that doesn’t affect its stability - feel what a safety margin Russia has!

Putin's successor, so to speak, will be his elite power group, distributed between several centers, which deprives our liberal column of hope for the emergence of a “new Gorbachev”, hence the universal howl of Pavlovsky experts, public figures of Yavlinsky, bulk and bull. They shout "everything is lost," because they really have everything gone, but what else remains for them? Hopes to surrender Russia somehow under the external control of the West after Ukraine again disappeared! But you need to work out old grants and somehow earn new ones for your “democratic" needs.

Why now?


President Putin’s unexpected announcement of constitutional reform is perceived by many as a force majeure. Our “well-wishers” are promoting this topic in the Western media, and some of our experts succumb to their modest charm.

At that time, when there was a very simple explanation: now it’s a very favorable moment for Russia — the foreign policy pressure from our main “partner” and the specialist in “democracy” and “regime change”, the USA, has significantly weakened. In America, there’s a “big sluggishness,” a struggle between President Trump and the Democratic Party against the backdrop of the next presidential election.

Simply put, Washington is not up to us today, the hotbed of gay democracy is busy fighting Trump. In this case, excesses are possible, and then we will not have time for constitutional reforms. It can be said that with this reform Russia is preparing for the US elections, for any development and outcome.

All of us are not eternal, and Vladimir Putin, too. The January 15 reforms are designed for a very promising future, after Putin. There can be no guarantees, not even constitutional ones, and President Putin is doing what he can to continue his political course after himself.

And about Ukraine


Political upheavals in the United States will inevitably affect their satellites, especially such weak ones as today's Ukraine, which has also managed to get involved in intra-American squabbles. In general, escalation of tension in Ukraine is possible. Zelensky something too often asks for meetings with Putin, only for the exchange of “held persons”. Yulia Tymoshenko has acted as a prophet and predicts the collapse of Ukraine.

Zelensky continues to make conflicting statements, both by yours and ours, which speaks of the instability of his position. He still cannot "deal" with Petro Poroshenko and fulfill his main election promise - to put Petro on the "well-deserved bunks". But the matter is not only in these “bunks” per se: Poroshenko poses a real threat to President Ze, and until he eliminates it, he himself will be in constant danger.
159 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. +26
      25 January 2020 05: 29
      Quote: Dalny V
      There is Putin - there is Russia, there is no Putin - there is no Russia. If not Putin, then a cat. Putinism is a long time. Putinism gobbled up Russia ...

      laughing good
      Our "Duma prophet" is more original in this regard:
      1. +23
        25 January 2020 05: 38
        But this, in fact, is scary - God forbid Putin decide to crank up the same feint with his ears as Sausages in Kazakhstan ... I’m afraid the people may not tolerate this.
        1. +14
          25 January 2020 06: 34
          God forbid Putin decide to crank the same feint with his ears, like Sausages in Kazakhstan ...

          Just for this "circus" is being started. And the appropriate choice is offered:
          for - only worse
          "against" - will definitely get worse.

          What's the choice? An old children's joke came to mind, where only "yes" and "no" can be answered:
          Your friends know that you are a dunce (the word is replaced by censorship)
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. -22
                25 January 2020 08: 39
                Quote: lexus
                You do not spend balm there. Much lower and on the other hand smear. So that later it will not break.

                Don’t wait! While I watch how it’s burning here wink So who do you have there now svetoch, savior of Russia? On YouTube there are a lot of them, but a small cart winked
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
              2. -18
                25 January 2020 09: 44
                Quote: lexus
                Much lower and on the other hand smear. So that later it will not tear

                Rude is bad for karma wink
                1. +13
                  25 January 2020 10: 06
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  Rude is bad for karma

                  Do not provoke wink
                  1. -17
                    25 January 2020 10: 23
                    Quote: solzh
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    Rude is bad for karma

                    Do not provoke wink

                    Firstly, it’s not a question for me. Secondly - they constantly provoke me, the whole team is working, and so what?

                    After all, it is not only harmful for Lexus, it is harmful for everyone wink
                    1. +7
                      25 January 2020 10: 34
                      And in my opinion, everything is right in the dialogue with us, our comments complement each other.

                      I am also often provoked and sometimes I don’t know how to react hi
            2. -16
              25 January 2020 08: 35
              Quote: Edik
              IN how does it root you, right balm on my heart

              hi Similarly! Right Putin stood across their throats! Can choke at last ... laughing
              1. -11
                25 January 2020 08: 44
                Quote: 30 vis
                Can choke at last ...

                But this is unlikely, their name is legion!
              2. +9
                25 January 2020 10: 10
                Quote: 30 vis
                Right Putin got across their throats

                Why did you get this?
                Quote: 30 vis
                May suffocate at last

                Do not wait wink
            3. +14
              25 January 2020 09: 33
              Quote: Edik
              straight balm to my heart

              It smells like your balm is not very. wink
              1. -13
                25 January 2020 09: 41
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                It smells like your balm is not very.

                Well, the medicine doesn’t always smell good! Well, what should I do? You have to endure until the physician’s fervor is over. But there is a double feeling, on the one hand it is good for health, but on the other it stinks.
                1. +36
                  25 January 2020 10: 33
                  Here is a "balm" from the achievements of your pet, eat, do not crap:
                  1. 50 billion for the Olympics, of course, is a beautiful thing, but he only used it to "launder" money from his friends and show off in front of the world.
                  2. The events in Ukraine in general showed an extremely ugly picture: the salvation of the "president-urkagan" on the one hand and the refusal to completely defeat Bandera in the Donbass.
                  3. Support for the decision of the population of Crimea on the one hand, and the refusal of the same support for the rest of the Russians in Ukraine.
                  4. Many beautiful words, many patriotic slogans, annual participation in the procession of the "Immortal Regiment" on the one hand, and on the other hand, complete disregard for the interests of those who are still alive - the ever-memorable Pension Reform.
                  5. Absolutely amorphous management and no control over the activities of ministers, heads of agencies and departments.
                  6. Astronomical amounts of bribes and theft in everything, they steal in the billions. But at the same time, the perpetrators of all these crimes do not bear absolutely no punishment.
                  7. In addition to the conveyor for the sale of natural resources, which is working at a Stakhanovite pace, there is absolutely nothing outstanding in the country.
                  8. The poorer population, the population fleeing the country, the natural population decline is growing, last year we fell by 300 thousand, the people are simply dying out.
                  1. -26
                    25 January 2020 10: 39
                    Fan-Fan if you still understood what you write, I would love to talk with you! And so, this is the same as explaining to the deaf to the sixth symphony of Tchaikovsky!
                    1. +21
                      25 January 2020 10: 59
                      Well, at least the last point - 300 thousand per year we became less, we are dying, what of a good life?
                      Or: "The number of highly qualified specialists who emigrated from Russia increased from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016. This was announced at the general meeting of the Russian Academy of Sciences by the chief scientific secretary of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikolai Dolgushkin."
                      So far, there is no such data for 18 years, but I think the numbers are no less, and what also comes from a good life?
                      1. -24
                        25 January 2020 11: 17
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        Well, at least the last point - 300 thousand per year we became less, we are dying, what of a good life?

                        There was a message from the president, the truth was told there about this issue and you watched it and asked a question! Believe me further ... to everyone who wants to rule the state better Yes
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        "The number of highly qualified specialists who emigrated from Russia has grown from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016

                        There is also reverse immigration to Russia and from Europe and from the USA and it is comparable with the numbers given by you! But for some reason you this was not reported ...
                      2. +8
                        25 January 2020 21: 24
                        Quote: Edik
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        Well, at least the last point - 300 thousand per year we became less, we are dying, what of a good life?

                        There was a message from the president, the truth was told there about this issue and you watched it and asked a question! Believe me further ... to everyone who wants to rule the state better Yes
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        "The number of highly qualified specialists who emigrated from Russia has grown from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016

                        There is also reverse immigration to Russia and from Europe and from the USA and it is comparable with the numbers given by you! But for some reason you this was not reported ...

                        Your message, this is a shameful talking room! Who are you holding idiots here? 20 years of boltology, it is strange that there are still those who listen to this slag!
                      3. -8
                        26 January 2020 06: 17
                        I thought about you, I repent feel
                    2. -22
                      25 January 2020 12: 16
                      Quote: Edik
                      And so, it’s the same as explaining to the deaf to Tchaikovsky’s sixth symphony!

                      Show color pictures to a blind person! They are now, like grouse on a current! They do not hear and do not see ... Only Putin! Putin! Putin! Guilty of impotence and diarrhea! And in general .... fellow
                      1. -15
                        25 January 2020 16: 38
                        The minusers of my comment confirmed the version of impotent diarrhea sufferers! laughing lol
                      2. +6
                        26 January 2020 12: 33
                        Quote: 30 vis
                        The minusers of my comment confirmed the version of impotent diarrhea sufferers! laughing lol

                        Cool!
                        One smart, but all du crayfish ....
                      3. -5
                        26 January 2020 13: 13
                        Monotony should be only in gas station of beds!
                        Quote: BecmepH
                        Quote: 30 vis
                        The minusers of my comment confirmed the version of impotent diarrhea sufferers! laughing lol

                        Cool!
                        One smart, but all du crayfish ....
            4. +24
              25 January 2020 12: 49
              The last year has shown the final and irrevocable division of society into the poor and the rich with a narrow layer of the wealthy. Feels like just tin! The proposed amendments to the Constitution should not only clearly divide the amorphous population into classes, but also consolidate this "toughness", at the same time selecting into the ruling class those rich who in the future, that is, after the departure of Putin, will support society in the position to which today came. The only question is how serious will be the resistance of the rich, who have lost access to government. I fully admit that the resource in the form of reliance on the people has so far been knocked out from under their feet by Putin's social investments. And then - how the card will fall. If the investments turn out to be insufficient, and the impending tax pressure on the average citizen is excessive, then the resource in the form of popular support will be knocked out from under the feet of Putin himself, which means the class of the rich created by him, admitted to governing the country. Consequently, the question boils down to whether Putin will be able to bring the state system to a consistent state in the remaining years of his presidency.
              1. -16
                25 January 2020 13: 32
                Quote: depressant
                The proposed amendments to the Constitution should not only clearly divide the amorphous population into classes, but also consolidate this "toughness", simultaneously selecting into the ruling class those rich who in the future,

                depressant More specifically, can you tell me exactly what amendment worries you so much? They madame are in the public domain hi
              2. +5
                25 January 2020 16: 22
                Yes, and I also disagree with Kamenev about easing the pressure. For example, the situation with "SP-2"
        2. +2
          27 January 2020 15: 01
          I'm afraid the people may not tolerate this.

          It’s necessary to rejoice if the people do not tolerate this ..
          But you should be afraid if the people swallow it in the same way as pension reform .. (IMHO, that’s how it will be)
      2. +8
        25 January 2020 06: 16
        You can see the YouTube Diary of the deputy. An interesting video from the point of view of a lawyer. It would be in VO to discuss. There is too much information to immediately digest and explain. This must be watched. hi The meaning of the introduction of the Civil Assembly is to block the nomination of candidates, which means the victory of the opposition through general elections. On the one hand, the thought is sound. Promotion to the role of leader of the best. The supreme power chooses the best. And on the other hand?
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +11
        25 January 2020 08: 21
        "Putin's transit: revolution from above"
        The liberal-conservative center-right ideology of V. V. Putin and of the ruling party of the Russian Federation created by him by the United Russia does not provide for revolution. Only evolutionary development.
        What happened ? A new natural stage in the development of Russia ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +8
        25 January 2020 05: 40
        Amoooor ... Lyuboooff ... (C) "Formula of love"
        1. -49
          25 January 2020 06: 12
          I read the comments and so it became disgusting
          We already had a standard of living in both the EU and the USA. Who does not remember the 90s?
          Just began to get out of the democratic back .... and again dissatisfied.
          They are very similar to the Ukrainians who were given the opportunity to get * smartly * RUSSIAN citizenship and how many people are dissatisfied with that ..... they do not issue passports just because they have already arrived. How much indignation that they need information from them and, in general, they dare to demand something.
          At least you should not lose your mind. Do not be like Khokhlov
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +6
              25 January 2020 07: 31
              afraid to ask who is great? IO Stalin does not take!
          2. -11
            25 January 2020 07: 27
            Dissatisfied will always be. Unfortunately, there are no two identical people on this planet, which makes conflicts inevitable, and misunderstanding is mandatory!
          3. +31
            25 January 2020 09: 27
            We already had a standard of living in both the EU and the USA. Who does not remember the 90s?

            About the "standard of living" that "was already" and about "got out of the pit" - smiled, thank you, - you made me a day. Yes And yet, in the US "blacks are lynched", and in the EU .... "do you want it like in France?" laughing
            Yes, and soon in Russia the concept of "minimum wage" will be canceled, replaced by some "unit", obviously so that the whole world will not be disgraced by its size, so characterizing all the "great" achievements of "Putinomics." love
          4. +7
            25 January 2020 09: 32
            Quote: Vasily50
            We already had a standard of living in both the EU and the USA. Who does not remember the 90s?

            good
            90s, in the 90s it was good, now it's generally tin
          5. -13
            25 January 2020 12: 08
            In the 90s I had to visit Europe. In Germany and France. I remember how the slums hit me. I was struck by the fact that there criminals have long divided the countries into zones of influence and the police officially support the clans of criminals. Professional criminals of various profiles, from pickpockets to swindlers, have been cultivated there for centuries. There even offices for the reception of orders for a criminal offense exist, at least in France. Struck by the homeless and street children. Today in Europe, Asians and Kosovans added to past problems
            Of course there are those who live and do not bother, as in RUSSIA. It’s only in the countries of the EU regime that it is not recommended to get sick, grow old, and God forbid getting on the sight of criminals, of course, if you are not * of royal blood * and not from the rich clan.
            In the movie to themselves, they shoot a lot of things but do not cost it to believe.
            1. +4
              25 January 2020 23: 59
              Buy yourself some medicine ...
            2. +3
              27 January 2020 14: 19
              and there are still people eating
      2. +6
        25 January 2020 06: 09
        And who is the author, otherwise I have an advertisement instead of an author and an article about advertising around, it’s not possible to read! Although I will only read comments
        1. +5
          25 January 2020 06: 14
          Victor Kamenev
          1. +34
            25 January 2020 06: 15
            Ahh, well, that’s all clear, he’s like Damantsev, he only figures in numbers and Kamenev is the praises of the current government hi
            1. +11
              25 January 2020 14: 24
              Quote: Popuas
              Ahh, well, that’s all clear, he’s like Damantsev, he only figures in numbers and Kamenev is the praises of the current government hi

              In my opinion: both authors are computer programs. Some analogue of the versifier for proles from 1984. The generator of random phrases and numbers. Akin to contextual advertising. Event first, then newspeak article. Listen to the news! Putin transit ...
    3. +11
      25 January 2020 06: 32
      And that Chad and Honduras were the second republic in the USSR and inherited the development of economy, industry, science and 3 military districts? I really didn’t know! Where can I read about it?
    4. +3
      25 January 2020 06: 51
      Quote: Dalny V
      Why not with Chad, not with Gabon, not with Honduras?
      Far away they, and the youth may not understand what it is about, the exam, and all that.
      with which the population has been running around in search of earnings throughout Europe for several years, but this does not affect its sustainability
      This is straight good, and Crimea with the Donbass - oh well, what little things, the right word.
    5. +8
      25 January 2020 07: 17
      Why not Chad? Where is he Chad then? Aw .....
      And Ukraine is ours, in the full sense of the word. If, in the year 14, they had done the right thing, at the request of Yanukovych, oh how many problems would have fallen off. This is a miscalculation of Putin. Very big. I wonder who advised him this.
      1. 0
        25 January 2020 23: 02
        but Sevastopol is not necessary to renew .... although yes, an expensive base turned out
    6. +11
      25 January 2020 08: 13
      Forgot the last pearl of Surkov. "Putinism is a geopolitical life hack".
    7. +15
      25 January 2020 09: 30
      Because - Kamenev!)) In his previous article, he NEVER mentioned Dill and it was amazing. But this set of words is a creative atmosphere familiar to the author!
    8. +14
      25 January 2020 10: 28
      Quote: Dalny V
      Oh my God ... Again the eulogy of Putin ... There is Putin - there is Russia, there is no Putin - there is no Russia.

      You look at the author ... it's Kamenev ... just Kamenev ... he has all the articles about it, there’s nothing to even discuss wassat
  2. -28
    25 January 2020 05: 11
    Thanks to the author for the article. I read it with interest. It was necessary to add about the new Yalta. And about the new Bretton Woods.
    1. +14
      25 January 2020 08: 14
      In Yalta, the world is divided by equals. So there will be no "new Yalta".
      1. -25
        25 January 2020 08: 28
        In terms of political influence, Russia has no equal. New Yalta to be.
      2. 0
        26 January 2020 20: 36
        According to the German Chancellor, Europe needs to change its place in the world in order to confront China, Russia and the United States.
        According to her, the USA, Russia and China from time to time force European countries to take a single position. “Very often it is difficult because of a difference in interests. Even the old woman recognizes the political weight of the Russian Federation.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. -13
        25 January 2020 09: 37
        General words ... That is nonsense about the king and the boyars, then nonsense about the transistor (he is the receiver). Boredom-boredom.
  3. +25
    25 January 2020 05: 15
    A duty change of a signboard (represented by the government) and a couple of slogans are not "a cardinal change of course." Rather, a "bone" for people.
    1. +39
      25 January 2020 05: 40
      Gone Bear
      Mishutka came
      Such a Putin joke

      The article is about nothing.
      1. +28
        25 January 2020 07: 02
        The article is about nothing.

        The article is not only about anything. From a professional point of view, she is absolutely amateurish. So, starting from the title itself, it becomes clear that the author of this opus has absolutely no understanding of what revolution is and what meaning is put into this term. Let me remind you that the classical definition of revolution, as applied to the sphere of politics, sounds like "a radical change in the socio-political system." And where from the theses given by the author do we see something at least slightly corresponding to this definition? The notorious "there will be several decision-making centers"? Let us omit the very controversial nature of this statement, dwell only on the fact that even if such a development of the situation really takes place, then even so it does not represent a cardinal change in the socio-political system, being just a change in the decision-making model. Let me tell you a secret that even a complete transition to a parliamentary model of government with the abolition of the presidency will not mean "revolution", as the author sees it. it will be just a transition from one model of democracy to another, of which there are a great many in the world.

        The only thing that is correctly noted in the article is that the States are really not up to us right now - a trade deal with China (read the agreement on the redistribution of spheres of influence in the world for the next 20 years) is much more important than the elderly weak opponent in the face of the Russian Federation, who still loves to shake his own nuclear baton, in the hope that his potency is still like that of a 20-year-old boy. Moreover, he categorically refuses to understand the fact that modern wars lie not so much in the plane of the open use of force, but in the sphere of economic and population expansion.

        The second more or less adequately noticed moment concerns the power elite. With the clarification that it is not the president who is the founder of this social category, but the power elite delegate their powers to the president. Of course, this is not about the formal personalities represented in the Federal Assembly or the Government of the Russian Federation. We are talking about those whose inviolability and lack of alternativeness is emphasized at every speech of the head of state when it comes to revising the results of privatization. This social group has developed long before the arrival of the current leader of Russia and has not undergone dramatic changes since then. They are the real masters of this country and the only center for making strategic decisions (others are simply not interesting to them and are left to the executive and legislative authorities at various levels).

        Well, of course, the style and presentation of information raises many claims, the main one of which is the clearly subjective nature of the reasoning. I understand that this is acceptable for the "Opinions" column, but one can feel the author's claim to some kind of analyticity, for which this is unacceptable.

        Well, a little video in the topic. Watch from 2:10
        1. 0
          25 January 2020 07: 36
          .... a social group has developed long before the arrival of the current leader of Russia and since then has not undergone dramatic changes ...
          But in your opinion, who and how should make these cardinal changes. Something I can’t even suggest.
          Changes in the constitution is the first step and then not complete, as we would like.
          1. +16
            25 January 2020 09: 10
            Changes in the constitution is the first step and then not complete, as we would like.

            For me, the indicated changes in the Constitution are not a step towards the redistribution of power from big capital to the side, as it is said in the highest RLA "the only bearer of sovereignty and source of power in the Russian Federation." In my opinion, this is, first of all, an attempt by any means to keep the official representative of the economic power group in a leading position, which allows to legally broadcast the will of elite groups as an imperative for the population living in the Russian Federation. No more and no less.

            But in your opinion, who and how should make these cardinal changes.

            In fact, there are quite a lot of those who want to "redistribute" or even completely demonstrate the existing system. The first to come to their senses, tk. the so-called "siloviki", who were left out of work after the reforms on the limit of state ownership, the results of which aroused reasonable indignation in their midst, because it was with the signal of the leadership of the State Security Service of the USSR that the orgy took place that led to the collapse of the Union and the establishment of capitalist relations. Actually, we could observe the process of confrontation between the siloviki and big business during the rivalry of the Fatherland - All Russia and Unity parties in the elections to the State Duma of the 3rd convocation, the results of which clearly demonstrated to both sides that further confrontation could lead to a renaissance of the left vector development. It was after these events that the incumbent president was assimilated as a spokesman for the interests of both parts of the Russian political elite. equally satisfied with both. However, being incorporated into the structure of the governing elite, the siloviki, in private, never stopped attacking the economic bloc, constantly trying to snatch one or another piece of the pie from their opponent. However, the arbiter in the person of the head of state has always managed to suppress major conflicts, maintaining some semblance of balance. Thus, in all his 20 years of reign, he never gave a reason to doubt his loyalty to any of his overlords. However, take it away and these people will grab each other's throats with great joy.

            I want you to understand one thing: both, in essence, do not care about the people. It’s just that the security officials, due to their specific nature, cannot be legalized in the West as their "colleagues" from the economic sector, and therefore they have to correlate all their actions in one way or another with the interests of the population of the territory under their jurisdiction. This is a forced measure, which nevertheless plays into the hands of us - ordinary citizens. The only question is why over 20 years the emphasis in the ruling elite has not been shifted in their favor. After all, I draw your attention to the fact that representatives of both power groups retained their key posts in the new government, even despite the fact that the demand for the creation of precisely the nationally thinking capital has long been formed by society.
            1. +2
              25 January 2020 14: 25
              Dante, I was captivated by how clearly you formulated the position and state of the security officials' opinions. Recently I heard from a retired general: "If a revolution starts from below, we officers will be in the forefront." I suppose this is the reason for the high-profile criminal cases against officers of one or another branch of the power government, but there are few cases against large civilian figures.
              Of course, it is difficult to rock our population from below, to one degree or another, penetrated by petty-bourgeois psychology from deeply Soviet times, even in its most destitute part, but it is possible. To do this, it’s enough to adopt a series of stupid laws. Deputies lobbied by interested parties will do so willingly.
      2. +19
        25 January 2020 08: 14
        An article that Putin is our everything, and if anyone is against it, then he is on a par with Navalny, Yavlinsky and even Gorbachev. And as always, Ukraine is an example.
    2. -1
      25 January 2020 07: 56
      Quote: Uran53
      is not a "cardinal change of course". Rather, a "bone" for people.

      Just a bone with a meat stamp was torn from those representatives of the authorities who have dual citizenship, real estate, etc., over the hill. Who slept and saw how they grabbed, dash with the dough on the Cote d'Azur. From under the liberals running for a salary at the Embassy of America, they knocked out a stool. Now it’s not even possible to become a deputy with two passports, isn’t that about this, more recently, there was a heated debate, demanding to remove such people from running the country? Fulfilled, again dissatisfied. Gentlemen, you decide what you want. I, again, am not a fan of Putin, but I also see how long the GDP has set the stage for this step, and you want everything at once. It doesn’t work out that way.
      1. +14
        25 January 2020 08: 23
        Vyacheslav, here's an answer to a simple question .. There is, for example, the federal law "On the Civil Service" which contains the requirements for a civil servant .. question:
        1. Why change the Constitution if you can just supplement the law? In this case, everything will also work. I will say more, after amendments to the Constitution, this law will be amended this way.
        2. Why are these changes only now, in 2020, and not in 2010, for example? What, before with 2 citizenship all the rules were?
        And my conclusion .. all these changes are tinsel! They can be made without the Constitution-Laws! the main reason for all this is the State Council, which if introduced into the Constitution, just like that, no one will disperse without a referendum.
        1. AUL
          +13
          25 January 2020 09: 08
          Quote: Level 2 Advisor
          And my conclusion .. all these changes are tinsel! They can be made without the Constitution-Laws! the main reason for all this is the State Council, which if introduced into the Constitution, just like that, no one will disperse without a referendum.

          IMHO, this is done to smear responsibility. The fact that the number of "decision-making centers" will grow is a bluff! Everyone understands where and by whom the decisions will be made in reality. But then there will be no one to ask for the consequences of these decisions - they will nod at each other.
          By the way, it would be nice to introduce into the new Constitution (which will be adopted with enthusiasm 76% of the vote wink ) a clause on limiting the term of the head of the State Council, say, 4 years and no more without "in a row". Eh, dreams, dreams ...
          The second time we are already changing the Constitution for a specific person. The trend, however!
          1. +9
            25 January 2020 09: 59
            Quote from AUL
            The second time we are already changing the Constitution for a specific person. The trend, however!

            A strange tendency and vicious practice.
        2. -12
          25 January 2020 09: 09
          Nicholas, the Constitution is the foundation of the state. Well, let's say, the skeleton, and laws are an application to it, we will call muscles. Unsuccessful analogy, but did not come up with a more suitable one. I think that laws will also change or supplement over time. Now, as I see it, Putin wants to cut off the pro-Western riffraff from the government, I think that after a turn comes the major purge of the government. I hope so. hi
          1. +5
            25 January 2020 10: 04
            Well, let's step back from the design of this legal project and make sense of how it works and why ...
            1. Protection from enemy agents in power. You know, I’m sure that now there are foreign intelligence agents in power. In addition, it is almost unbelievable that they have a second citizenship — intelligence of the enemy, I think not fools — to have an agent who has a direct, undisguised relationship with foreign countries. If he needs to escape, he will be given citizenship, I think no one has. So this is unlikely to affect them.
            2. Protection against just enemies / thieves of the country in power. Well .. he will not have citizenship, he will have his wife, which in most countries, when he escapes to the country where his wife has citizenship, automatically gives him a residence permit as the wife of a citizen, immediately after contacting the authorities. And then citizenship, after a few years. In many countries, this scheme works not only for the spouse, but also for the parents.
            Total, I DO NOT SEE how this norm will work FACT! Then the wife also needs a ban on second citizenship, otherwise there will be a minister, for example, with a wife a US citizen, and this will be within the framework of the Constitution.
            But with a bunch of minuses of the USSR, I just can’t imagine that the minister had a wife-citizen of another country. And there will be no ban on this, even after these amendments.
            And that is why I say, the only thing that changes the norm in the project is the State Council, the rest-populism-is legally easy to circumvent. If the ban is not only on the civil servant, but also on members of his family, then I believe that the GDP of the country is being considered by this project. So far, he, as a lawyer, has veiled the essence very well and I don’t think that family members will appear in the project.
            1. -2
              25 January 2020 10: 16
              Unfortunately, we have a minimum of information, more precisely, the necessary minimum level, in order to predict the next steps in GDP. With all its drawbacks, hardly anyone would call him stupid, and it is likely that he has already thought through the following steps to enable him to achieve the desired result (it is possible to include close relatives on the list at the level of the law). It remains only to speculate on guesses, because it is very difficult to predict, there are too many constantly changing variables in this equation. Personally, I think a lot cannot be expected from this change, but I hope for some kind of small positive.
              1. +3
                25 January 2020 14: 48
                And I have no doubt that the amendment on citizenship will not affect the wives and children of officials. What will be motivated by humanism. Like, we are not animals! And globalization, however. And none of the voting deputies will accept the idea that if your relatives are citizens of another state, and your financial situation is therefore strengthened there, and not here, then the official will be the soul and thoughts with that state, and not with Russia. And it will act in his interests. Hence my opinion. The amendment has zero exhaust. It is directed against a specific group of oligarchs with whom Putin never found a common language. They did not persuade them to invest in Russia, but they lay claim to the highest power in the country and to key posts. That is, he excluded the possibility of a power seizure of power. In his opinion. In my opinion, no. They want, capture. In the meantime, they have enough purchased deputies and officials. They will seize and change the Constitution. Without asking us. Just confronting the fact.
            2. -2
              25 January 2020 19: 09
              To make any demands on parents and children, as well as the spouses of candidates for public office, utter nonsense. This is a violation of human rights. The exception is minor children. By the way, the next of kin can be political opponents by opinion. And they can have their own political, economic and other ambitions. Incidentally, they themselves may well apply for positions in the civil service system, and put forward their candidatures for elected posts.
              1. -1
                26 January 2020 08: 24
                I’m talking about this, the proposed norm sounds cool, but it won’t work, it's a dummy.
                Sergei, do you think the wives of thieving officials, they are "successful" businesswomen and their children get high on the stolen money "do you know who my dad is?" - will have much different views than an official? well, perhaps, at best, 10 percent of them ..
          2. +3
            25 January 2020 20: 05
            So we have the whole pro-Western government. All leadership policy, since the collapse. It deals with only one thing, selling the Soviet heritage and reducing the role of the state in human life. More and more around us are companies of different oligarchs and deputies, that the state is replacing us for money. Since P appeared in power, the number of ministerial rearrangements has been numerous. Reforms are even greater. But they all benefited. The same pension reform is the work of his hands and the government of his friends.
            And which of the laws issued - "cleans" the government from "Westerners".
  4. +5
    25 January 2020 05: 30
    They changed the government, now we need to wait a bit, to improve, to suffer, otherwise it will be like in Ukraine. For twenty years they have been rubbing the same thing.
    1. +9
      25 January 2020 07: 33
      But how much more can you endure !? us, and so bent!
  5. +5
    25 January 2020 05: 47
    How much can confuse foreign and domestic policy ??? If the outside has become better for us, then what is it with us, dear? Country for us or we for her ??? There is no answer ... And this is not a revolution. Initially, they put the new prime minister in a certain framework ... a pensioner ... progressive tax, etc. You will not be spoiled! The presence of Belousov is unlikely to change anything. And I would like to see changes in our everyday routine during my life ... And for this we need revolutions ??? Just to make insolent bureaucrats WORK the authorities are still not enough ???
    1. -1
      25 January 2020 15: 05
      Mikhail 55, did you want to say "no progressive tax"?
      And how do you like this law, just adopted by the State Duma: after a divorce, the father is now obliged to pay not only child support, but also to pay housing for the child. That's the whole demography! Given the low salaries and unemployment. I don’t know about you, but I feel sorry for such a father.
      1. +3
        25 January 2020 19: 14
        Can you give a link to the fact that such a law has been adopted? Is this not another initiative of individual deputies? In this case, if the child was left with his father, in theory, should his mother pay for the housing?
      2. 0
        26 January 2020 19: 43
        Quote: depressant
        I don’t know about you, but I feel sorry for such a father.

        Not for me! My father is an alimony, and he is malicious. Rare and bastard. And in life. And there are a lot of such freaks, evading not only from alimony, but from elementary help to the child from another marriage! So I am ABSOLUTELY not a pity!
  6. +14
    25 January 2020 06: 00
    The current government is only concerned with the preservation of power and actually slows down the development of the country. The best thing the president could do now is to step down with the government. But this will not happen, and he will hold on to power with his teeth, because he is afraid of responsibility.
    1. +8
      25 January 2020 06: 30
      What responsibility is he afraid of? And most importantly, to whom to answer? Anyway, his henchman will come in his place. And the responsibility will be the same as that of Yeltsin, i.e. no. It is not offensive, but it is.
    2. -7
      25 January 2020 07: 42
      Aw .... The government is gone. Who did this?
      And what is afraid is right. We are all afraid of something new, unpredictable.
      1. +10
        25 January 2020 10: 36
        Sorry to change the order of presentation.
        Quote: olpin51
        We are all afraid of something new, unpredictable.

        You can talk about us for a long time, but I’ll say what ordinary people are afraid of, not burdened by state duties and property taxes. All of them do not want their disenfranchised position, indicated by decrees, laws, articles and regulations, to change for the worse. At the end of life, they managed to achieve a "precarious balance." This suits them because of the cardinal changes that they were in the 90s they simply will not survive. A vivid example of the older generation, dying of hunger, abandoned to its fate. It was this “new”, such “unpredictable” that they drew with a caricature change of government.
        Here are those who decided to “wait” for milk from a cow male, tell us what events inspired you such confidence? Maybe that Medvedev and Co., after the liberation of state seats, received a stiff replacement for them in the form of stools and wooden loungers fastened for the day? According to merit, so to speak ... For the failure of the assigned business ... For "there is no money, but you hold on" with a surplus budget ... Nothing of the kind. This fact is not only alarming, but also suggests that the cart in a cart without changes.
        As for the younger people, they are only afraid that it is difficult to discern worthy people in our vast country. Some dominance of empty, worthless, unusable, cynical villains who usurped the right to dispose of other people's lives ...

        Quote: olpin51
        And what is afraid is right.

        The authorities are afraid of the truth. He is afraid that literate people will appear and publicly prove to those who are still “zombied” with promises and promises that the real power is not the elite and cream of society at all, but the most ordinary “foam” that lies on the surface of a society in an unstable state.
        But, most importantly, she is afraid of losing this right to legislate, indicate, and dispose of. Because in their life they have not learned anything but serving the bosses and humiliating their subordinates.
  7. +16
    25 January 2020 06: 13
    Those. as it was before the "reforms": not the liberal government, under pressure from the liberals, adopted liberal laws and this infuriated the liberals. The adopted laws under the pressure of the liberals, the non-liberal government will not change and this again infuriates the liberals. The author has been writing for several years about the impeachment of the dear his heart to the American president, "midnight is approaching, but still no Herman," but not today, tomorrow is a civil war ... in the United States ... laughing
    1. +9
      25 January 2020 10: 47
      Quote: parusnik
      Those. as it was before the "reforms": not the liberal government, under pressure from the liberals, adopted liberal laws and this infuriated the liberals. The adopted laws under pressure from the liberals, the non-liberal government will not change, and this again infuriates the liberals ..

      Who are these "liberals" under the pressure of whom laws were passed? Who is “not a liberal” in Putin’s power structures? Putin himself said that Russia will not turn from the path of a liberal market economy. You will then agree to the end - "Russian pro-Western liberals." It is thanks to them that we have what we have.
      In a situation when the so-called transit of power is being analyzed - the usual replacement of frayed, shabby chess pieces on the board of hundred-cell checkers, it is not clear what the rules of the game are, the rules of the arrangement of pieces are incomprehensible and he himself washed away this arrangement.
      1. +6
        25 January 2020 17: 47
        hi Greetings! ... My fault, in the right places, did not put emoticons denoting sarcasm smile And so, here it’s not chess pieces, but a speckled deck of cards with 8 aces, so I wrote about this in the comments ... and more than once ... smile hi
  8. +12
    25 January 2020 07: 29
    The revolution is too loudly said. Fasting castling.
  9. -11
    25 January 2020 07: 58
    As if Putin hadn’t been casterized .. But remember what kind of Russia did he accept?
    The poor, humiliated with blood, choking and almost on the verge of collapse .. And what it is now, not quite deiocratic, as the West and neoliberals would like, but still moving forward .. Putin will leave, don’t worry, maybe soon .. But Russia needs stability and so that without world wars .. (we know how to fight and always get into all the world squabbles) How would we this time aside to observe how the United States in the second world ..
    1. +16
      25 January 2020 09: 17
      From that Russia, the 1999 model, it was possible to dazzle whatever you want, there was enough freedom of speech, thought, but Putin did not choose except to slide into authoritarianism and preserve personal power. This is not a creative, it is a repressive choice. If we ignore the "Putin's cookies" (which, by the way, are conditioned by the raw materials market, he has no merits in this), the country is going in the wrong direction, in the wrong place ...
      1. -7
        25 January 2020 12: 28
        Quote: Stils
        From that Russia, the sample of 1999, it was possible to dazzle what you want, freedom of speech, thought was enough, but besides slipping into authoritarianism, maintaining personal power,

        Do you remember TU Russia 90s? Terrorist attacks Chechnya yelling akbar that we are going to Moscow, etc. Berezovsky with his smile and K.
        There is gangster lawlessness in the country, shooting in Moscow, and even in the province ... corpses of lawlessness .. etc.

        Quote: Stils
        Putin did not choose. It is not creative, it is repressive

        If Putin gave the order, then people like you would shut up right away ..
        You whine about "dermocracy" ..
        We also have "creative NKVD and SMERSH" in Russia.
        So be careful here to yell and even more so in the west .. bully
    2. +13
      25 January 2020 09: 50
      Quote: Collective Farm
      As if Putin hadn’t been casterized .. But remember what kind of Russia did he accept?

      Let's compare the Russia of the 90s with a sick person. The healing process is inherent in every person by nature. And here there are three options for recovery - natural, accelerated by treatment, and regressive when there is recovery, but very slow, due to the influence of external negative factors that inhibit the process of regeneration of the body.
      At the moment, the development of the country is proceeding according to the third variant of recovery, if we draw analogies with the human body. And all Putin's "achievements" are very, very dubious. hi
      1. -5
        25 January 2020 09: 59
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        The healing process is inherent in every person by nature. And here there are three options for recovery - natural, accelerated by treatment, and regressive

        recourse
        Regression (lat. Regressio "reverse movement, return") :.

        you braided gyrus?
        Is it like back to the future?

        Quote: Ingvar 72
        At the moment, the country's development is on the third option for recovery

        sad
        1. +12
          25 January 2020 10: 45
          Hello Leo Orthodox. hi What did you want to say? That I didn’t insert the word, or did the meaning not reach you?
          1. -4
            25 January 2020 11: 03
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Hi Levoslav

            And you do not get sick, faithful

            Quote: Ingvar 72
            What did you want to say? That I didn’t insert the word, or did the meaning not reach you?

            both
            hi
            1. +3
              26 January 2020 03: 42
              Quote: Ingvar 72: Hello Levoslav

              Quote: atalef: And you do not get sick, faithful

              boys to the right, girls to the left laughing
          2. -4
            25 January 2020 12: 31
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Hello Leo Orthodox. hi What did you want to say? That I didn’t insert the word, or did the meaning not reach you?

            Yes, forum users from Israel just to spit in the direction of Russia .. Nostalgia for them)))))
      2. +6
        25 January 2020 12: 58
        And here there are three options for recovery - natural, accelerated by treatment, and regressive when there is recovery, but very slow, due to the influence of external negative factors that inhibit the process of regeneration of the body.

        You forgot about remission - the period of the course of a chronic disease, which is manifested by a significant weakening (incomplete remission) or disappearance (complete remission) of its symptoms. So there are four options, not three. Incomplete remission, by the way, also suits the situation we are considering.
        1. +5
          25 January 2020 20: 05
          Quote: Dante
          You forgot about remission - the period of the course of a chronic disease,

          This is what I meant by the third option. Thanks for the amendment. hi
    3. +15
      25 January 2020 11: 04
      Quote: Collective Farm
      No matter how Putin was casterized ..But remember which Russia he took ?

      Before bonfiring or discussing someone, let's just change your favorite phrase:
      “But, remember what his predecessors and associates brought Russia to before the EBN handed over the reins to Putin”...
      One could talk about Putin's merits if, in the government entrusted to him, he would get rid of that superficial that destroyed the statehood of the USSR. Russia is not the antipode of the Soviet Union, but its (as stated) SUCCESSOR !!!
      Now look around and tell us why the successor was destroyed by the economy by transferring enterprises and industries to private hands? What has improved for the country's population?
      Having understood that the Russian people are gradually realizing (will understand) the benefits of Putin's "economic" transformations and can simply pay what they deserve, ONE decided that the state power should be equipped so that even a new, truly popular president could neither change nor decide in terms of worsening the situation of all these newly-born "people's servants."
      Only, either the people became more literate, then everyone was tired of reacting to screams: “Wolves! Wolves! " "Sanctions! Sanctions! Ukraine! Ukraine! ”- but, consciousness began to return. And it won’t succeed in fogging it with a show circus ...
      1. -11
        25 January 2020 12: 39
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Before bonfiring or discussing someone, let's just change your favorite phrase:
        “But, remember what his predecessors and associates brought Russia to before the EBN transferred the reins of power to Putin” ...

        Ukraine appeared 7))))
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Only, either the people became more literate, then everyone was tired of reacting to cries: “Wolves! Wolves! " "Sanctions! Sanctions! Ukraine! Ukraine! ”- but, consciousness began to return. And it won’t succeed in fogging it with a show circus ...

        But now Ukraine is being conceived in the world as a state praising the Nazis, and despite the fact that Jews are in power and financial flows ..

        How do you like this?
        Ukraine, do not wake up to take on .. Let the bastards themselves each other with \ devour!
        PS Cleansing of Kiev will be authorized by Donbass officials .. We will cover them in Russia! soldier
        We will block all the airspace and borders ..
        1. +6
          25 January 2020 13: 09
          Well, now Ukraine is associated in the world as a state praising the Nazis

          No need to isolate the Russians and the rest of the world. Many countries of Europe after Crimea are very sympathetic to them, I am silent about the States and Canada (which, as everyone knows, is the northernmost region of the Independent). But for some reason I’m sure that most countries of the world treat Ukraine simply neutrally. What can we say in most of the former Union republics with the current Ukrainian authorities, these are quite neutral business relations that are far from shaking hands. So let's not broadcast our attitude to all other members of the international community. It is at least dishonest to ourselves.
        2. +11
          25 January 2020 14: 00
          Quote: Collective Farm
          We will block all the airspace and borders ..

          One feels the style of the site of a certain “khe-khe” adequate citizen known among old-timers.
          In our topic, Ukraine is not fastened by any side, okromya "casual".
          And therefore it is necessary to understand their own problems. We must become kind and attractive ourselves, and people (and not partners) will be drawn to us ...
          hi
          1. -9
            25 January 2020 14: 56
            Quote: ROSS 42
            One feels the style of the site of a certain “khe-khe” adequate citizen known among old-timers.
            In our topic, Ukraine is not fastened by any side, okromya "casual".

            Well, today I have a son in biathlon took second place .. The wind with frost is creepy .. But he shot clearly !! hi
            The hand does not flinch! Me too .. soldier
          2. -2
            26 January 2020 06: 35
            Quote: ROSS 42
            In our topic, Ukraine is not fastened by any side, okromya "casual".
            And therefore it is necessary to understand their own problems. We must become kind and attractive ourselves, and people (and not partners) will be drawn to us ...

            Just in your topic Ukraine rises to its full height! Such as YOU whined, whined, whined, and whined at all corners and toilets, and then putting money in their pocket they went to the Maidan! Well, what did they stop stealing? whining people like you remember! And I well remember how many corpses on people like you! drinks
  10. +3
    25 January 2020 08: 07
    Interesting business smile I read the comments. The bulk are not very happy with the article. BUT ... for some reason they plus - they minus our scribble almost exactly !!! smile Or write one, think another ... Riddle. And on the topic. Even before 2024. FOUR more years! Che twitching? Prove by BUSINESS that you are power! Weak ??? Let us recall KRYMNASH - how great it became in my soul !!! Or are you walking in the columns of the Immortal regiment and around a sea of ​​people .. in memory !!! OK!!! Well, roll up your expensive sleeves BOYARA ... ay
    1. +3
      25 January 2020 14: 05
      Quote: Michael55
      Even before 2024. FOUR more years! Che twitching? Prove by BUSINESS that you are power! Weak ??? Let us recall KRYMNASH - how great it became in my soul !!! Or are you walking in the columns of the Immortal regiment and around a sea of ​​people .. in memory !!! OK!!! Well, roll up your expensive sleeves BOYARA ... ay

      good
      Great thoughts. That is exactly what those who are not on the couch today, but at work think. What, in fact, are trying to "stir up"? Changed the "awl" to "soap" publican? belay
  11. -11
    25 January 2020 08: 21
    After yesterday’s article, when Putin raised his soldier’s cap and pride for the supreme in every subsequent commentary, I realized that they were ready to forgive a lot for this act, even pension reform ...
    But in fact, almost everyone who forgave Putin this unpopular reform has long been retired, and it’s not just one pension that matters.
    It’s clear that Putin is a good man and that he has done a lot for Russia, but a good man is not a panacea, and on the other side of the scales there is what could be done ...
    It is clear that he is not physically eternal, however, like the elites surrounding him are not eternal for a number of reasons ...
    So the faster the complete transformation of power takes place, the faster we will begin to live according to the new rules. Now we are just delaying the end of the inevitable ...
  12. +13
    25 January 2020 08: 22
    By the way, the State Duma has already voted for the new amendments, spitting on the opinion of the people.
    Are you sure that there will be a referendum? But what if the people vote against the amendments? Will they be canceled?
    Volodin was asked about this, it’s so awkward of him ...
    1. -7
      25 January 2020 10: 00
      Quote: GRIGORIY76
      Are you sure that there will be a referendum?

      Did someone declare a referendum?

      Constitution of the Russian Federation, Art. 84
      c) call a referendum in the manner prescribed by federal constitutional law;

      Federal Constitutional Law of June 28.06.2004, 5 No. 18.06.2017-FKZ (as amended on June XNUMX, XNUMX)
      "On the referendum of the Russian Federation"

      14 Article. Referendum initiative
      1. The referendum initiative belongs to:
      1) at least two million citizens of the Russian Federation entitled to participate in a referendum, provided that no more than 50 thousand of them reside in the territory of one subject of the Russian Federation or in aggregate outside the territory of the Russian Federation;

      Who announced the referendum? Someone announced the collection of signatures?
      1. +3
        26 January 2020 07: 57
        Quote: Boris55
        . The referendum initiative belongs to:
        1) at least two million citizens of the Russian Federation eligible to participate in a referendum

        You have gathered the necessary benefit of the referendum on the abolition of pension reform, where is the referendum?
        We have the law turned like a drawbar
  13. +5
    25 January 2020 08: 35
    Quote: Far In
    But this, in fact, is scary - God forbid Putin decide to crank up the same feint with his ears as Sausages in Kazakhstan ... I’m afraid the people may not tolerate this.

    First, we must respect the people of the neighboring country and call a spade a spade - Elbasy. Do not respect others, do not respect yourself. And do not speak for the people about which you seem to know nothing and never knew. Secondly, while "tricks with the ears" are being done by all sorts of "democratically" minded "comrades", whose faces we have been seeing for many years, and whose activities have destroyed the very concepts of "democracy" and "liberalism". However, they stubbornly continue their activities.
  14. +10
    25 January 2020 09: 02
    A revolution is a change of the existing system. As was capitalism, so it remained. What kind of revolution are we talking about?
  15. -20
    25 January 2020 09: 02
    Quote: V. Kamenev
    Vladimir Putin will not be re-elected in 2024, will step down as president, but will continue to lead the “Putin elite” under the new president of Russia ... Putin will leave and remain at the same time!

    In order to understand why this is so, and not otherwise - read an excerpt from the primer, increase political literacy.

    "State policy and management in a crowd-" elite "society is an agreement reached on the capabilities of various clan-corporate groupings in using the state structure and system to achieve their narrowly corporate goals."

    It does not matter who represents the clan-corporate interests in the visible part of the government, it does not matter what his last name is - he will defend the interests of his clan.

    Quote: V. Kamenev
    and the latter infuriates our pro-Western party and other “all-proverbs”: their spells about the collapse of Russia again disappeared.

    And how many are there on the VO site. See how they are in comments, joyfully plus every bad word about Putin, and how vehemently minus the truth about him.

    Quote: V. Kamenev
    Why now?

    They (the pro-Western elite) themselves determined their date of death.
    After it was announced that the President's message would be on January 15th, two days later, they set their meeting for the same date. The question was being decided: with whom the "elite" and if it is with them, then the announcement of the beginning of the counter revolution to Putin. The overwhelming majority of the "elite" made their choice - they came to the president's message. Another revolution in Russia is canceled.

    Thanks to the author for the article.
    1. -10
      25 January 2020 10: 00
      And you, Boris, thanks for the comment. hi
  16. +11
    25 January 2020 09: 20
    Glory to the Great Putin! These words should end the article. The author should continue to be guided.
  17. +10
    25 January 2020 09: 21
    But what kind of "revolution from above" is this?
    This is not even the evolution from above to the fullest ...
    The course remains the same. The "presidential republic" remains presidential.
    Half of the government has changed. The people are also ambiguous.
    The people were given a little money from state bins. And then the burning rubber began to smell.
    The government felt a threat from below for itself. And reacted.
    But now the threats are gone. People talk about "unprecedented prospects" as if they were.
    Media bosses on all screens perked up. And day and night praise the foresight and foresight.
    Well - we will rejoice!
    Until the next "fateful changes" ... wink
  18. +5
    25 January 2020 09: 27
    Some nonsense.
  19. +15
    25 January 2020 09: 27
    The revolution from above ....
    And what will it give?
    The Ministry of Economic Development appointed M.Reshetnikov.
    An internship in Perm was completed and promoted.
    What did he accomplish in Perm from the point of view of the people?
    Tried to rename the airport.
    The people opposed. Canceled.
    I removed trolleybuses from the streets of Perm. In favor of the bus lobby.
    The most tragic: I decided to destroy the historical and strategically important Goronozavodskaya railway, which is used daily by thousands of Perm and the region's residents. Instead, I was going to build a very long and almost completely uncomfortable detour and build an additional railway bridge for this.
    Permians are indignant, but
    builders from Moscow rub their hands in anticipation ....
    The price is hundreds of billions.
    Reshetnikov Perm came from Moscow with an offensive nickname about interest.
    And the Governor of the Destroyers leaves with the ZAGU.
  20. +4
    25 January 2020 09: 56
    Revolution is good. Will the people live better?
    1. -15
      25 January 2020 11: 00
      Every time before the revolution, some rubbish inspires the people that they live sooooo badly. We have already gone through this. Then the people demolish the head of state, overturn their state. As a result: the country collapses, the economy and industry collapse, the civil war and famine begin.
      And only then will the people know what a bad life is.
      1. Cop
        +1
        25 January 2020 19: 23
        Quote: AU Ivanov.
        ..... Then the people demolish the head of state, overturn their state. As a result: the country collapses, the economy and industry collapse, the civil war and famine begin.
        C'mon, Andryusha, did the Finns demolish their ruler and after that there, what did they enter the cards for bread?
        1. 0
          26 January 2020 08: 57
          Andrei, you don’t understand the mood of the people, simply because you belong to the rare species in the country — the middle class .. would you have income — like most people would think differently, and even better, most would be middle class .. this you have nothing and no reason to change .. and people with sn in 20-30tr and without special prospects, are not happy with today's alignment ..
          1. +1
            26 January 2020 11: 34
            What I agree with you in principle, after all kinds of revolutions of the 1917 type, there is a severe deterioration in the standard of living and such funds are possible if there are absolutely no prospects for improvement.
  21. +12
    25 January 2020 10: 07
    And at this time .....

    Mishustin introduced a salary bonus for security officials for working on protests.
    This is a monthly allowance of up to 100% of the monthly salary "for the complexity of the tasks performed."

    Now disgruntled will be peeling sticks with a vengeance.
  22. +6
    25 January 2020 10: 35
    Quote: Uran53
    A duty change of a signboard (represented by the government) and a couple of slogans are not "a cardinal change of course." Rather, a "bone" for people.

    Officials all over the world have this favorite "entertainment" - the illusion of change, both cheap and cheerful ..
  23. +3
    25 January 2020 11: 25
    Kamenev ... The surname is iconic ... Like Zinoviev, for example ...
    So, I will wait for the second coming of a certain Georgian for the Russians ... Although ... I am sure that "they" have taken into account their mistakes ... they will not admit ...
  24. +2
    25 January 2020 11: 32
    Quote: Far In
    But this, in fact, is scary - God forbid Putin decide to crank up the same feint with his ears as Sausages in Kazakhstan ... I’m afraid the people may not tolerate this.

    The people will tolerate. Our people are too patient and fragmented enough to throw out their intolerance
  25. -5
    25 January 2020 11: 51
    Zelensky something too often asks for meetings with Putin

    so the Americans are demanding to know if it’s time to move the ukrovermaht to the Donbass and Crimea, otherwise they give money, but there is no exhaust.
    The Americans are not used to this; they need to work out the pieces of silver.
    and until he eliminates it, he himself will be in constant danger.

    So this is the correct American policy - "balance of power", let today's vassal know that there is someone to replace him (the most Ze can count on is to sign papers and read speeches written entirely in the CIA department of the SBU, but not more). And nobody will let Ze break it.
  26. BAI
    +3
    25 January 2020 11: 57
    Some observers call the January 15 reform a “revolution from above." In some ways this metaphor is true: the reforms announced by President Putin significantly change the configuration of the supreme power, redistribute power between the institutions of the president, the State Duma, the government and the State Council. This is a real separation of powers, which the democrats have always talked about, but our "democrats" are terribly unhappy with this, because they are also pro-Western puppets.

    The incumbent president is preparing leverage for himself to maintain control over government action after resigning.
    Only one conclusion can be drawn from this - there is no person in whom he could rely on. There is no one to transfer power to.
  27. +3
    25 January 2020 12: 58
    Reading about the revolution "from above" is, of course, pleasant. And it’s inexpensive to write about it. If, as they say, Mishustin found out about his appointment at the time of the announcement of the decision (and the others too), then the essence of what is happening will not be clear earlier. Come back in three years - we'll talk.
    You need to live long in the Russian Federation, then you will live to see everything.
  28. +9
    25 January 2020 13: 40
    My article about the electromagnetic catapult was not allowed, but this "creativity" is quietly passing?

    Haha
    1. Cop
      +2
      25 January 2020 19: 18
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      My article about the electromagnetic catapult was not allowed, but this "creativity" is quietly passing?
      Give a link to it, I will read it with pleasure.
      1. +3
        25 January 2020 22: 01
        I sent it for moderation yesterday, the admins removed. I printed the article immediately on this site, so the text was not saved.
        The Americans conducted new trials of their aircraft carrier Gerald Ford in January.
        They tested an electromagnetic catapult and an aerofinisher.
        For the first time, heavy ERLA E2A Hawkeye aircraft, C2A Greyhound transporters, T-45 training fighters, and EW E / A 18 Growler aircraft were launched from the deck


        1. Cop
          0
          30 January 2020 10: 12
          Quote: maden.usmanow

          They tested an electromagnetic catapult and an aerofinisher.
          Good video. Thank. And we even could not really make a steam. Although it seems they made a prototype.
  29. +11
    25 January 2020 13: 45
    All amendments to the Constitution should be through a referendum and the Constitutional Assembly, and as proposed, it is illegal. The constitution is not an instruction for an electric kettle.
    1. -3
      25 January 2020 15: 31
      Quote: Altona
      The constitution is not an instruction for an electric kettle.

      Do you know how this constitution was adopted? Not?
    2. -1
      25 January 2020 19: 22
      Have you read the Constitution? It all depends on which sections of the Constitution are supposed to be amended. For the amendments that are being discussed, approval by a qualified majority in both houses of the Federal Assembly, followed by approval by the legislative assemblies of at least three quarters of the subjects of the federation, is sufficient.
      1. +3
        26 January 2020 12: 08
        Quote: iouris
        Do you know how this constitution was adopted? Not?

        I know, then I was 24 years old. Then there was no such overwhelming rush, there was a Constitutional Assembly and a vote. Now this is not offered at all.
        Quote: Sergej1972
        For the amendments that are being discussed, approval by a qualified majority in both houses of the Federal Assembly, followed by approval by the legislative assemblies of at least three quarters of the subjects of the federation, is sufficient.

        It is enough to pervert everything, to spoil and say that it was so. Especially those people who can only lie and crap. And these people do not represent me at all. I did not select them. The Federation Council did not elect, did not elect the head of the republic, and voted for the Communist Party from the lower house of the Duma. So let them shove their amendments into their noble places.
        1. -2
          26 January 2020 12: 54
          Quote: Altona
          I know, then I was 24 years old. Then there was no such overwhelming rush, there was a Constitutional Assembly and a vote. Now this is not offered at all.

          Yes, of course! The moment when one of the young reformers told how he dashed this constitution overnight on his knee is especially interesting! Eugene isn’t funny for you yourself? But I'm sad!
          Quote: Altona
          It is enough to pervert everything, to spoil and say that it was so. Especially those people who can only lie and crap

          Quote: Altona
          And these people do not represent me at all. I did not select them. The Federation Council did not elect, did not elect the head of the republic, and voted for the Communist Party from the lower house of the Duma. So let them shove their amendments into their noble places.

          Here will be an all-Russian vote, take the bulletin and put it wherever you want!
          And what specific amendment annoys you so much?
        2. 0
          26 January 2020 15: 01
          And where is your vote? In any country, always part of the population votes for the opposition
        3. 0
          26 January 2020 16: 02
          I voted against this Constitution in 1993, but this does not mean that I am not obliged to obey it. I voted against Yeltsin in 1991 and 1996, against Medvedev in 2008, against Putin in 2000 and 2004 (in 2012 and 2018 I voted for him). Nevertheless, they were still the presidents of my country and I was obliged to comply with their decrees if their action extended to ordinary citizens.
  30. +9
    25 January 2020 14: 18
    The article can be described in a few words - “spring has come, summer has come, thanks to Putin for that”)))
  31. +4
    25 January 2020 14: 53
    Quote: depressant
    And I have no doubt

    No one doubts any more ... Do you remember in the film "Crown of the Russian Empire" the moment when a Frenchman instructs his clowns: "Make more noise, gentlemen!" So today some will make noise like that ...
  32. +4
    25 January 2020 18: 11
    The stormy orgasm of a pro-author writer? Is the author so naive that he considers what happened to be a revolution from above? In my opinion, this is just a beautiful move, when the ruler’s rating falls.
    I especially liked this: “They shout 'everything is lost', because they really have lost everything, and what else is left for them? The hopes of somehow handing over Russia under the external control of the West, following Ukraine, are gone again! But you need to work off old grants and somehow earn new ones for their 'democratic' needs. " What is this paranoia? Russia has long been under external control, and all the amendments to the Constitution only consolidate power for the "friends". Everything is correct here: "Putin's successor, if I may say so, will be his elite group in power, distributed among several centers." That is, now it will be impossible to change this "elite" in any way legally.
    So the general domestic and foreign policy will remain unchanged. Just look at the "new" government. And as much as the author would not like, but the fate of Ukraine awaits us, only in a less radical and time-consuming way.
    The article is a huge minus.
  33. +2
    25 January 2020 18: 26


    Oh, comrades ...
  34. Cop
    +1
    25 January 2020 19: 06
    In some ways, this metaphor is true ....
    No, Mr. author, this is a banal coup. Because constitutional amendments must be adopted individually.
    Vladimir Putin will not be re-elected in 2024, resigning as president, but will continue to lead the "Putin elite ....."
    It is quite possible. No wonder that they are trying to introduce the provisions on the new body in the form of amendments to the Russian constitution. Apparently Vladimir Vladimirovich is preparing it for himself. Then I will venture to suggest that this very body will be cooler than the presidential one.
    .... hopes for the emergence of a "new Gorbachev"
    Not only the “new Gorbachev”, but also the “new Stalin”. Author, isn’t he sweet to you? If it’s sweet, then who is Vladimir Vladimirovich from your point of view?
    .... feel what a safety margin in Russia then!
    Do not confuse the President of Russia and Russia itself. It is good for Russia when its presidents come and go, and on their own feet, and not on a gun carriage and in a "funnel". And why did our president not allow either Navalny or Yavlinsky to go to the elections? Maybe it's just its strength?
    ...... now it’s a very favorable moment for Russia - the foreign policy pressure from our main “partner” has significantly weakened ...
    No, Mr. author, the elections to the State Duma are just coming, and Edro will be given a ride at them, unless of course the counting is fair. What then will our ... leader of the nation do?
    The January 15 reforms are designed for a very promising future, after Putin.
    And again, there is no Mr. author, designed for Putin's time, since he is going to rule ..... forever.
    Political disturbances in the United States will inevitably affect their satellites ....
    And how did they affect Russia, especially judging by our GDP (Gross Domestic Product). So it turns out that we are their satellites? Mr. Kamenev, you need to take a more responsible approach to writing articles .... Or are employers ... pushing you? laughing
  35. +2
    25 January 2020 19: 41
    Since when did the theatrical power changes become a "revolution"?
    The illusion of changes for the sake of creating a background of "non-authoritarianism". The entire resignation (and even then, not all ministers, but only half) and new laws. No more than populism.
    Although no, you know, there are changes, now any person who becomes president after Putin will be more limited in authority. It seems good, but not for the fact that the GDP could manipulate the work of the next president through the Duma, which is still the same people.
    And the new amendments ... not new ... either these are insignificant changes (like maternity capital, which is a struggle with the consequences, and not with the cause of the demographic decline), or what has already been just written down in the constitution.
    And if all this is a "revolution from above for the good", then what prevented him from doing the same thing earlier?!?!?!
  36. +3
    25 January 2020 19: 54
    Quote: Fan-Fan
    Here is a "balm" from the achievements of your pet, eat, do not crap:
    1. 50 billion for the Olympics, of course, is a beautiful thing, but he only used it to "launder" money from his friends and show off in front of the world.
    2. The events in Ukraine in general showed an extremely ugly picture: the salvation of the "president-urkagan" on the one hand and the refusal to completely defeat Bandera in the Donbass.
    3. Support for the decision of the population of Crimea on the one hand, and the refusal of the same support for the rest of the Russians in Ukraine.
    4. Many beautiful words, many patriotic slogans, annual participation in the procession of the "Immortal Regiment" on the one hand, and on the other hand, complete disregard for the interests of those who are still alive - the ever-memorable Pension Reform.
    5. Absolutely amorphous management and no control over the activities of ministers, heads of agencies and departments.
    6. Astronomical amounts of bribes and theft in everything, they steal in the billions. But at the same time, the perpetrators of all these crimes do not bear absolutely no punishment.
    7. In addition to the conveyor for the sale of natural resources, which is working at a Stakhanovite pace, there is absolutely nothing outstanding in the country.
    8. The poorer population, the population fleeing the country, the natural population decline is growing, last year we fell by 300 thousand, the people are simply dying out.

    Two words about LLC Sochi. The man, who was invited to participate as a master, escaped from the sphere of dormostroi in the second week. It became creepy ... Guess why? See also personal participation and the results of the Vostochny construction.
  37. +2
    25 January 2020 19: 56
    Quote: Dr. Evil
    Glory to the Great Putin! These words should end the article. The author should continue to be guided.

    Do not even jokingly throw such words! Suddenly he will understand at face value he or our ancestors!
  38. +1
    25 January 2020 20: 02
    Quote: Altona
    All amendments to the Constitution should be through a referendum and the Constitutional Assembly, and as proposed, it is illegal. The constitution is not an instruction for an electric kettle.

    Mm ....!? Authors without notice to the reader are allowed to modify the content in the interests of the manufacturer.
  39. +3
    25 January 2020 20: 07
    Quote: iouris
    Reading about the revolution "from above" is, of course, pleasant. And it’s inexpensive to write about it. If, as they say, Mishustin found out about his appointment at the time of the announcement of the decision (and the others too), then the essence of what is happening will not be clear earlier. Come back in three years - we'll talk.
    You need to live long in the Russian Federation, then you will live to see everything.

    Quote: iouris
    Reading about the revolution "from above" is, of course, pleasant. And it’s inexpensive to write about it. If, as they say, Mishustin found out about his appointment at the time of the announcement of the decision (and the others too), then the essence of what is happening will not be clear earlier. Come back in three years - we'll talk.
    You need to live long in the Russian Federation, then you will live to see everything.

    Taxman at the helm of the government !? Crouch the blue-footed!
    Picking - no building, no talent! There are some questions, the redhead will tell you how to tighten!
  40. +2
    25 January 2020 20: 11
    The revolution!!!?? Those. radical restructuring of industrial and social relations in the state !? In which place? More details please from this place! We drain the "lake" !?
  41. -1
    26 January 2020 00: 12
    They say that it is impossible to change the constitution from a floundering bay!
    As it was written, so it is necessary to change. And do not breed creepy about the priority of international law.
  42. +2
    26 January 2020 01: 45
    Very pleased with the comments. Everyone understands everything. There is no revolution from above and there cannot be. The power bloc in the government and the economic one does not change. "And you, friends, no matter how you sit down, you are all no good for musicians."
  43. +2
    26 January 2020 07: 34
    All revolutions are ALWAYS carried out from above. Revolutions ALWAYS require organization, financing, material support. No lower classes were NEVER capable of this.
    1. 0
      26 January 2020 20: 19
      Quote: ignoto
      All revolutions are ALWAYS carried out from above.

      No. Not always. Revolutions took place from below when there was from above ... Well, the scribe, in short, had no control, power and will at all. We recall Louis 18th and WFR and the Provisional Government and WOSR. I don’t take Nicholas II into account, because in this case there really was a revolution from above ..
  44. -2
    26 January 2020 11: 47
    Yes, Victor, it turned out interestingly. Yes Just messed with a spoon, and shit like boils ... fellow But in general, the roll call was successful - the whole shobla got out, including corrupt runners, such as greasy mattress toppers and six-end electricians.
    The swamp worries ONCE
    Swamp worries TWO
    The swamp worries THREE ...
    Tsyts, liberda, snot erase.

    hi
  45. +2
    26 January 2020 21: 08
    Quote: Edik
    Quote: Fan-Fan
    "The number of highly qualified specialists who emigrated from Russia has grown from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016

    There is also reverse immigration to Russia and from Europe and from the USA and it is comparable with the figures given by you! But for some reason you were not informed about this ...


    Return migration from Europe and the USA is repeatedly, by orders of magnitude, blocked by hordes of uneducated illegal migrants.
    Try driving in the Moscow metro in the morning - 70% of passengers look like representatives of Central Asia.
    So, it turns out that highly qualified specialists go abroad, and poorly educated people with an alien worldview come.
    And then we get a surge of crime, drug addiction killings and rape.

    "If we take the general statistics and divide by the number of rapes who commit them, then 75% are made by visitors from outside the Moscow region. Of these, 90% are from Asian countries: Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan."- said Trubnikov.
    But the authorities and business are satisfied. Their children study in London, their houses behind high ruble fences.


    https://ria.ru/20160825/1475238398.html
  46. -1
    27 January 2020 15: 24
    it’s enough to look at the neighboring pro-European country, with which the population has been running around for several years in search of earnings throughout Europe, but this does not affect its sustainability - Feel what a safety margin in Russia then!


    Yes, no ..
    If at least something unites a neighboring country - the same hatred of Russia, the desire to take revenge, etc. .. what unites us with Kadyrov ??
    Well, I understand that I’ll hurt many people - is it really that I (if honestly) are interested in some Sakhalin, Kamchatka, or the Chukchi in the north ??
    No, I certainly do not mind that we all live (in any case, while still in one country, etc., but I don’t see any RESERVE of strength in the form of inextricable ties .. Maybe someone and otherwise, but I don't see anyone in my environment who would suddenly "climb the barricades" if tomorrow, let Kazan / Peter decide to secede or something like that ..
    Ordinary people are no longer up to this in our country ..
  47. -4
    28 January 2020 19: 23
    Quote: Edik
    Quote: lexus
    You do not spend balm there. Much lower and on the other hand smear. So that later it will not break.

    Don’t wait! While I watch how it’s burning here wink So who do you have there now svetoch, savior of Russia? On YouTube there are a lot of them, but a small cart winked

    We look