Putin transit: revolution from above


Some observers call the January 15 reform a “revolution from above." In some ways this metaphor is true: the reforms announced by President Putin significantly change the configuration of the supreme power, redistribute power between the institutions of the president, the State Duma, the government and the State Council. This is a real separation of powers, which the democrats have always talked about, but our "democrats" are terribly unhappy with this, because they are also pro-Western puppets.


Putin's elite


Vladimir Putin will not be re-elected in 2024, resigns as president, but will continue to lead the “Putin elite” under the new president of Russia, and the latter infuriates our pro-Western party and other “all-proverbs”: their spells about the collapse of Russia have disappeared again. Putin leaves and remains at the same time!

To understand how great Putin’s Russia’s stability is, just look at a neighboring pro-European country, with which the population has been scampering for jobs throughout Europe for several years, but that doesn’t affect its stability - feel what a safety margin Russia has!

Putin's successor, so to speak, will be his elite power group, distributed between several centers, which deprives our liberal column of hope for the emergence of a “new Gorbachev”, hence the universal howl of Pavlovsky experts, public figures of Yavlinsky, bulk and bull. They shout "everything is lost," because they really have everything gone, but what else remains for them? Hopes to surrender Russia somehow under the external control of the West after Ukraine again disappeared! But you need to work out old grants and somehow earn new ones for your “democratic" needs.

Why now?


President Putin’s unexpected announcement of constitutional reform is perceived by many as a force majeure. Our “well-wishers” are promoting this topic in the Western media, and some of our experts succumb to their modest charm.

At that time, when there was a very simple explanation: now it’s a very favorable moment for Russia — the foreign policy pressure from our main “partner” and the specialist in “democracy” and “regime change”, the USA, has significantly weakened. In America, there’s a “big sluggishness,” a struggle between President Trump and the Democratic Party against the backdrop of the next presidential election.

Simply put, Washington is not up to us today, the hotbed of gay democracy is busy fighting Trump. In this case, excesses are possible, and then we will not have time for constitutional reforms. It can be said that with this reform Russia is preparing for the US elections, for any development and outcome.

All of us are not eternal, and Vladimir Putin, too. The January 15 reforms are designed for a very promising future, after Putin. There can be no guarantees, not even constitutional ones, and President Putin is doing what he can to continue his political course after himself.

And about Ukraine


Political upheavals in the United States will inevitably affect their satellites, especially such weak ones as today's Ukraine, which has also managed to get involved in intra-American squabbles. In general, escalation of tension in Ukraine is possible. Zelensky something too often asks for meetings with Putin, only for the exchange of “held persons”. Yulia Tymoshenko has acted as a prophet and predicts the collapse of Ukraine.

Zelensky continues to make conflicting statements, both by yours and ours, which speaks of the instability of his position. He still cannot "deal" with Petro Poroshenko and fulfill his main election promise - to put Petro on the "well-deserved bunks". But the matter is not only in these “bunks” per se: Poroshenko poses a real threat to President Ze, and until he eliminates it, he himself will be in constant danger.
Author:
Photos used:
kremlin.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

159 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. Ross xnumx 25 January 2020 05: 29 New
      • 39
      • 13
      +26
      Quote: Far In
      There is Putin - there is Russia, there is no Putin - there is no Russia. If not Putin, then a cat. Putinism is a long time. Putinism gobbled up Russia ...

      laughing good
      Our "Duma prophet" in this regard is more original:
      1. Far B 25 January 2020 05: 38 New
        • 47
        • 24
        +23
        But this, in fact, is scary - God forbid Putin decide to crank up the same feint with his ears as Sausages in Kazakhstan ... I’m afraid the people may not tolerate this.
        1. Lexus 25 January 2020 06: 34 New
          • 29
          • 15
          +14
          God forbid Putin decide to crank the same feint with his ears, like Sausages in Kazakhstan ...

          Just for this "circus" and started. And the choice is offered appropriate:
          "for" - only worse
          “against” - definitely worsen.

          What is the choice? The old children's joke was remembered where only "yes" and "no" can be answered:
          Your friends know that you are a dunce (the word is replaced by censorship)
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. Edik 25 January 2020 08: 39 New
                • 13
                • 35
                -22
                Quote: lexus
                You do not spend balm there. Much lower and on the other hand smear. So that later it will not break.

                Don’t wait! While I watch how it’s burning here wink So who do you have there now svetoch, savior of Russia? On YouTube there are a lot of them, but a small cart winked
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
              2. Golovan Jack 25 January 2020 09: 44 New
                • 13
                • 31
                -18
                Quote: lexus
                Much lower and on the other hand smear. So that later it will not tear

                Rude is bad for karma wink
                1. solzh 25 January 2020 10: 06 New
                  • 22
                  • 9
                  +13
                  Quote: Golovan Jack
                  Rude is bad for karma

                  Do not provoke wink
                  1. Golovan Jack 25 January 2020 10: 23 New
                    • 10
                    • 27
                    -17
                    Quote: solzh
                    Quote: Golovan Jack
                    Rude is bad for karma

                    Do not provoke wink

                    Firstly, it’s not a question for me. Secondly - they constantly provoke me, the whole team is working, and so what?

                    It is not only harmful to Lexus, it is harmful to everyone wink
                    1. solzh 25 January 2020 10: 34 New
                      • 9
                      • 2
                      +7
                      And in my opinion, everything is right in the dialogue with us, our comments complement each other.

                      I am also often provoked and sometimes I don’t know how to react hi
            2. Xnumx vis 25 January 2020 08: 35 New
              • 16
              • 32
              -16
              Quote: Edik
              IN how does it root you, right balm on my heart

              hi Similarly! Right Putin stood across their throats! Can choke at last ... laughing
              1. Edik 25 January 2020 08: 44 New
                • 16
                • 27
                -11
                Quote: 30 vis
                Can choke at last ...

                But this is unlikely, their name is legion!
              2. solzh 25 January 2020 10: 10 New
                • 18
                • 9
                +9
                Quote: 30 vis
                Right Putin got across their throats

                Why did you get this?
                Quote: 30 vis
                May suffocate at last

                Do not wait wink
            3. Ingvar 72 25 January 2020 09: 33 New
              • 24
              • 10
              +14
              Quote: Edik
              straight balm to my heart

              It smells like your balm is not very. wink
              1. Edik 25 January 2020 09: 41 New
                • 10
                • 23
                -13
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                It smells like your balm is not very.

                Well, the medicine doesn’t always smell good! Well, what should I do? You have to endure until the physician’s fervor is over. But there is a double feeling, on the one hand it is good for health, but on the other it stinks.
                1. Fan-fan 25 January 2020 10: 33 New
                  • 49
                  • 13
                  +36
                  Here’s a “balm” for your pet’s achievements, eat, don’t slap it:
                  1. 50 billion for the Olympics, of course it’s a beautiful thing, but he used it only so that his friends “laundered” the money and show off in front of the world.
                  2. Events in Ukraine in general showed an extremely unattractive picture: the salvation of the “president-urkagan” on the one hand and the refusal to completely defeat Bandera in the Donbass.
                  3. Support for the decision of the Crimean population on the one hand, and denial of the same support to other Russians in Ukraine.
                  4. Many beautiful words, many patriotic slogans, annual participation in the procession of the "Immortal Regiment" on the one hand, and on the other hand, a complete disregard for the interests of those who are still alive - the memorable Pension Reform.
                  5. Absolutely amorphous management and no control over the activities of ministers, heads of agencies and departments.
                  6. Astronomical amounts of bribes and theft in all, steal billions. But at the same time, the perpetrators of all these crimes do not bear absolutely no punishment.
                  7. In addition to the conveyor selling natural resources operating at the Stakhanov pace, nothing outstanding is observed in the country.
                  8. The poorer population, the population fleeing the country, the natural population decline is growing, last year we fell by 300 thousand, the people are simply dying out.
                  1. Edik 25 January 2020 10: 39 New
                    • 11
                    • 37
                    -26
                    Fan-Fan if you still understood what you write, I would love to talk with you! And so, this is the same as explaining to the deaf to the sixth symphony of Tchaikovsky!
                    1. Fan-fan 25 January 2020 10: 59 New
                      • 30
                      • 9
                      +21
                      Well, at least the last point - 300 thousand per year we became less, we are dying, what of a good life?
                      Or: “The number of highly qualified specialists emigrated from Russia increased from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016. This was explained at the general meeting of the Russian Academy of Sciences by the chief scientific secretary of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences Nikolai Dolgushkin.”
                      So far, there is no such data for 18 years, but I think the numbers are no less, and what also comes from a good life?
                      1. Edik 25 January 2020 11: 17 New
                        • 10
                        • 34
                        -24
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        Well, at least the last point - 300 thousand per year we became less, we are dying, what of a good life?

                        There was a message from the president, the truth was told there about this issue and you watched it and asked a question! Believe me further ... to everyone who wants to rule the state better yes
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        "The number of highly qualified specialists emigrated from Russia increased from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016

                        There is also reverse immigration to Russia and from Europe and from the USA and it is comparable with the numbers given by you! But for some reason you this was not reported ...
                      2. Erik 25 January 2020 21: 24 New
                        • 13
                        • 5
                        +8
                        Quote: Edik
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        Well, at least the last point - 300 thousand per year we became less, we are dying, what of a good life?

                        There was a message from the president, the truth was told there about this issue and you watched it and asked a question! Believe me further ... to everyone who wants to rule the state better yes
                        Quote: Fan-Fan
                        "The number of highly qualified specialists emigrated from Russia increased from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016

                        There is also reverse immigration to Russia and from Europe and from the USA and it is comparable with the numbers given by you! But for some reason you this was not reported ...

                        Your message, this is a shameful talking room! Who are you holding idiots here? 20 years of boltology, it is strange that there are still those who listen to this slag!
                      3. Edik 26 January 2020 06: 17 New
                        • 4
                        • 12
                        -8
                        I thought about you, I repent repeat
                2. Xnumx vis 25 January 2020 12: 16 New
                  • 7
                  • 29
                  -22
                  Quote: Edik
                  And so, it’s the same as explaining to the deaf to Tchaikovsky’s sixth symphony!

                  Show color pictures to a blind person! They are now, like grouse on a current! They do not hear and do not see ... Only Putin! Putin! Putin! Guilty of impotence and diarrhea! And in general .... fellow
                  1. Xnumx vis 25 January 2020 16: 38 New
                    • 6
                    • 21
                    -15
                    The minusers of my comment confirmed the version of impotent diarrhea sufferers! laughing lol
                  2. BecmepH 26 January 2020 12: 33 New
                    • 8
                    • 2
                    +6
                    Quote: 30 vis
                    The minusers of my comment confirmed the version of impotent diarrhea sufferers! laughing lol

                    Cool!
                    One smart, but all du crayfish ....
                  3. Xnumx vis 26 January 2020 13: 13 New
                    • 1
                    • 6
                    -5
                    Monotony should be only in gas station of beds!
                    Quote: BecmepH
                    Quote: 30 vis
                    The minusers of my comment confirmed the version of impotent diarrhea sufferers! laughing lol

                    Cool!
                    One smart, but all du crayfish ....
    2. depressant 25 January 2020 12: 49 New
      • 29
      • 5
      +24
      The last year has shown the final and irrevocable division of society into poor and rich with a narrow layer of wealthy people. Feels like just a tin! The proposed amendments to the Constitution should not only clearly divide the amorphous population into classes, but also consolidate this “tin” by simultaneously taking to the ruling class those rich who, in the future, that is, after Putin’s departure, will support society in the situation today have come. The only question is how serious will be the resistance of the rich, who have lost access to governing the country. I fully admit that the resource in the form of reliance on the people has so far been knocked out of their hands by Putin's social investments. And then - how the card will fall. If the investment is not sufficient, and the upcoming tax pressure on the average citizen is excessive, then the resource in the form of popular support will be knocked out from under Putin’s feet, which means he created a class of wealthy people who were allowed to rule the country. Consequently, the question boils down to whether Putin will be able to bring the state system to a consistent state in the remaining years of the presidency.
      1. Edik 25 January 2020 13: 32 New
        • 7
        • 23
        -16
        Quote: depressant
        The proposed amendments to the Constitution should not only clearly divide the amorphous population into classes, but also consolidate this "tin", simultaneously taking to the ruling class those rich who, in the future,

        depressant More specifically, can you tell me exactly what amendment worries you so much? They madame are in the public domain hi
      2. 210ox 25 January 2020 16: 22 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Yes, and I still don’t agree with Kamenev about easing the pressure. For example, the situation with "SP-2"
  • Roman070280 27 January 2020 15: 01 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    I'm afraid the people may not tolerate this.

    It’s necessary to rejoice if the people do not tolerate this ..
    But you should be afraid if the people swallow it in the same way as pension reform .. (IMHO, that’s how it will be)
  • SOVIET UNION 2 25 January 2020 06: 16 New
    • 15
    • 7
    +8
    You can see the YouTube Diary of the deputy. An interesting video from the point of view of a lawyer. It would be in VO to discuss. There is too much information to immediately digest and explain. This must be watched. hi The meaning of the introduction of the Civil Assembly is to block the nomination of candidates, which means the victory of the opposition through general elections. On the one hand, the thought is sound. Promotion to the role of leader of the best. The supreme power chooses the best. And on the other hand?
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  • To be or not to be 25 January 2020 08: 21 New
    • 15
    • 4
    +11
    Putin's transit: revolution from above
    The liberal-conservative center-right ideology of V. V. Putin and of the ruling party of the Russian Federation created by him by the United Russia does not provide for revolution. Only evolutionary development.
    What happened ? A new natural stage in the development of Russia ...
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. Far B 25 January 2020 05: 40 New
      • 22
      • 14
      +8
      Amooooh ... Lyuboofff ... (C) "Formula of love"
      1. Basil50 25 January 2020 06: 12 New
        • 22
        • 71
        -49
        I read the comments and so it became disgusting
        We already had a standard of living in both the EU and the USA. Who does not remember the 90s?
        Just began to get out of the democratic back .... and again dissatisfied.
        They are very similar to the Ukrainians who were given the opportunity to get * smartly * RUSSIAN citizenship and how many people are dissatisfied with that ..... they do not issue passports just because they have already arrived. How much indignation that they need information from them and, in general, they dare to demand something.
        At least you should not lose your mind. Do not be like Khokhlov
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Far East 25 January 2020 07: 31 New
            • 9
            • 3
            +6
            afraid to ask who is great? IO Stalin does not take!
        2. olpin51 25 January 2020 07: 27 New
          • 5
          • 16
          -11
          Dissatisfied will always be. Unfortunately, there are no two identical people on this planet, which makes conflicts inevitable, and misunderstanding is mandatory!
        3. Monster_Fat 25 January 2020 09: 27 New
          • 44
          • 13
          +31
          We already had a standard of living in both the EU and the USA. Who does not remember the 90s?

          About the "standard of living" which, "was already" and about "got out of the pit" - he smiled, thanks, - you made me a day. yes And also, in the USA "blacks lynch", and in the EU .... "do you want, like in France?" laughing
          Yes, and soon in Russia the concept of "minimum wage" will be canceled, replaced with some kind of "unit", obviously so that the whole world does not disgrace its size, which characterizes all the "great" achievements of "Putinism." love
        4. atalef 25 January 2020 09: 32 New
          • 11
          • 4
          +7
          Quote: Vasily50
          We already had a standard of living in both the EU and the USA. Who does not remember the 90s?

          good
          90s, in the 90s it was good, now it's generally tin
        5. Basil50 25 January 2020 12: 08 New
          • 8
          • 21
          -13
          In the 90s I had to visit Europe. In Germany and France. I remember how the slums hit me. I was struck by the fact that there criminals have long divided the countries into zones of influence and the police officially support the clans of criminals. Professional criminals of various profiles, from pickpockets to swindlers, have been cultivated there for centuries. There even offices for the reception of orders for a criminal offense exist, at least in France. Struck by the homeless and street children. Today in Europe, Asians and Kosovans added to past problems
          Of course there are those who live and do not bother, as in RUSSIA. It’s only in the countries of the EU regime that it is not recommended to get sick, grow old, and God forbid getting on the sight of criminals, of course, if you are not * of royal blood * and not from the rich clan.
          In the movie to themselves, they shoot a lot of things but do not cost it to believe.
          1. Nikitich 25 January 2020 23: 59 New
            • 6
            • 2
            +4
            Buy yourself some medicine ...
          2. From Siberia we 27 January 2020 14: 19 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            and there are still people eating
    2. The popuas 25 January 2020 06: 09 New
      • 15
      • 9
      +6
      And who is the author, otherwise I have an advertisement instead of an author and an article about advertising around, it’s not possible to read! Although I will only read comments
      1. Kleber 25 January 2020 06: 14 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Victor Kamenev
        1. The popuas 25 January 2020 06: 15 New
          • 49
          • 15
          +34
          Ahh, well, that’s all clear, he’s like Damantsev, he only figures in numbers and Kamenev is the praises of the current government hi
          1. Doctor Evil 25 January 2020 14: 24 New
            • 14
            • 3
            +11
            Quote: Popuas
            Ahh, well, that’s all clear, he’s like Damantsev, he only figures in numbers and Kamenev is the praises of the current government hi

            In my opinion: both authors are computer programs. Some analogue of the versifier for proles from 1984. The generator of random phrases and numbers. Akin to contextual advertising. Event first, then newspeak article. Listen to the news! Putin transit ...
  • Uncle Vanya Susanin 25 January 2020 06: 32 New
    • 16
    • 5
    +11
    And that Chad and Honduras were the second republic in the USSR and inherited the development of economy, industry, science and 3 military districts? I really didn’t know! Where can I read about it?
  • Vladimir_2U 25 January 2020 06: 51 New
    • 9
    • 6
    +3
    Quote: Far In
    Why not with Chad, not with Gabon, not with Honduras?
    Far away they, and the youth may not understand what it is about, the exam, and all that.
    with which the population has been running around in search of earnings throughout Europe for several years, but this does not affect its sustainability
    This is straight good, and Crimea with the Donbass - oh well, what little things, the right word.
  • olpin51 25 January 2020 07: 17 New
    • 14
    • 6
    +8
    Why not Chad? Where is he Chad then? Aw .....
    And Ukraine is ours, in the full sense of the word. If, in the year 14, they had done the right thing, at the request of Yanukovych, oh how many problems would have fallen off. This is a miscalculation of Putin. Very big. I wonder who advised him this.
    1. Sadam 25 January 2020 23: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      but Sevastopol is not necessary to renew .... although yes, an expensive base turned out
  • GRIGORIY76 25 January 2020 08: 13 New
    • 15
    • 4
    +11
    Forgot the last Surkov pearl. "Putinism is a geopolitical life hack."
  • The leader of the Redskins 25 January 2020 09: 30 New
    • 20
    • 5
    +15
    Because - Kamenev!)) In his previous article, he NEVER mentioned Dill and it was amazing. But this set of words is a creative atmosphere familiar to the author!
  • Stirbjorn 25 January 2020 10: 28 New
    • 18
    • 4
    +14
    Quote: Far In
    Oh my God ... Again the eulogy of Putin ... There is Putin - there is Russia, there is no Putin - there is no Russia.

    You look at the author ... it's Kamenev ... just Kamenev ... he has all the articles about it, there’s nothing to even discuss wassat
  • Tank jacket 25 January 2020 05: 11 New
    • 16
    • 44
    -28
    Thanks to the author for the article. I read it with interest. It was necessary to add about the new Yalta. And about the new Bretton Woods.
    1. GRIGORIY76 25 January 2020 08: 14 New
      • 20
      • 6
      +14
      In Yalta, the world is divided equal. So there will be no "new Yalta".
      1. Tank jacket 25 January 2020 08: 28 New
        • 10
        • 35
        -25
        In terms of political influence, Russia has no equal. New Yalta to be.
      2. Tank jacket 26 January 2020 20: 36 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        According to the German Chancellor, Europe needs to change its place in the world in order to confront China, Russia and the United States.
        According to her, the USA, Russia and China from time to time force European countries to take a single position. “Very often it is difficult because of a difference in interests. Even the old woman recognizes the political weight of the Russian Federation.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. Tank jacket 25 January 2020 09: 37 New
        • 6
        • 19
        -13
        General words ... That is nonsense about the king and the boyars, then nonsense about the transistor (he is the receiver). Boredom-boredom.
  • Uran53 25 January 2020 05: 15 New
    • 38
    • 13
    +25
    The duty change of sign (represented by the government) and a couple of slogans are not a “cardinal change of course”. Rather, a "bone" for people.
    1. Kleber 25 January 2020 05: 40 New
      • 58
      • 19
      +39
      Gone Bear
      Mishutka came
      Such a Putin joke

      The article is about nothing.
      1. Dante Alighieri 25 January 2020 07: 02 New
        • 39
        • 11
        +28
        The article is about nothing.

        The article is not just about anything. She is absolutely amateurish from a professional point of view. So, starting with the title itself, it becomes clear that the author of this opus has absolutely no understanding of what a revolution is and what is the meaning of this term. Let me remind you that the classical definition of revolution, applied to the sphere of politics, sounds like "a cardinal change in the socio-political system." And where from the theses given by the author we see something at least a little consistent with this definition? The notorious "there will be several decision centers"? We will omit the very controversy of this statement, we will focus only on the fact that even if such a development of the situation really takes place, then even so it does not constitute a cardinal change in the socio-political system, being just a change in the decision-making model. I’ll tell you a secret that even a complete transition to a parliamentary model of governance with the abolition of the presidency will not mean “revolution”, as the author sees it, because it will be just a transition from one model of democracy to another, of which there are a great many in the world.

        The only thing that is correctly noted in the article is that the States are really not up to us right now - a trade deal with China (read the agreement on the redistribution of spheres of influence in the world for the next 20 years) is much more important than the elderly weak opponent in the face of the Russian Federation, who still loves to shake his own nuclear baton, in the hope that his potency is still like that of a 20-year-old boy. Moreover, he categorically refuses to understand the fact that modern wars lie not so much in the plane of the open use of force, but in the sphere of economic and population expansion.

        The second more or less adequately noticed moment concerns the power elite. With the clarification that it is not the president who is the founder of this social category, but the power elite delegate their powers to the president. Of course, this is not about the formal personalities represented in the Federal Assembly or the Government of the Russian Federation. We are talking about those whose inviolability and lack of alternativeness is emphasized at every speech of the head of state when it comes to revising the results of privatization. This social group has developed long before the arrival of the current leader of Russia and has not undergone dramatic changes since then. They are the real masters of this country and the only center for making strategic decisions (others are simply not interesting to them and are left to the executive and legislative authorities at various levels).

        Well, and so, of course, the style and presentation of information raises many claims, the main one of which is the clearly subjective nature of the reasoning. I understand that this is acceptable for the heading "Opinions", but the author’s claim to some kind of analyticity is felt, for which this is unacceptable.

        Well, a little video in the topic. Watch from 2:10
        1. olpin51 25 January 2020 07: 36 New
          • 6
          • 6
          0
          .... a social group has developed long before the arrival of the current leader of Russia and since then has not undergone dramatic changes ...
          But in your opinion, who and how should make these cardinal changes. Something I can’t even suggest.
          Changes in the constitution is the first step and then not complete, as we would like.
          1. Dante Alighieri 25 January 2020 09: 10 New
            • 22
            • 6
            +16
            Changes in the constitution is the first step and then not complete, as we would like.

            For me, the indicated changes in the Constitution are not a step in the direction of redistributing power from big capital to the side, as stated in the highest legislative act of the "sole bearer of sovereignty and source of power in the Russian Federation." In my opinion, this is, first of all, an attempt to retain the official representative of the economic and power group by any means in a leadership position that allows legally transmitting the will of elite groups as an imperative for the population living on the territory of the Russian Federation. No more and no less.

            But in your opinion, who and how should make these cardinal changes.

            In fact, there are a lot of people who want to “redistribute”, or even completely demount, the existing system. The first to come to their senses, because called "siloviks", who remained out of work after reforms on the limit of state ownership, the results of which caused a reasonable outrage among them, because it was from the go-ahead of the leadership of the USSR State Security Council that bacchanalia occurred, which led to the collapse of the Union and the establishment of capitalist relations. Actually, we could observe the process of confrontation between security forces and big capital during the rivalry between the Fatherland-All Russia and Unity parties in the elections of the State Duma of the 3rd convocation, the results of which clearly demonstrated to both sides that further confrontation could well lead to a renaissance of the left vector development. It was after these events that the incumbent president was ordained to express the interests of both parts of the Russian political elite, as equally suited both those and others. However, having been incorporated into the structure of the managerial elite, the security forces privately never stopped attacking the economic bloc, constantly trying to snatch a piece of cake from their opponent. However, the major conflicts the arbiter in the person of the head of state always managed to suppress, while maintaining some semblance of balance. Thus, for all his 20 years of rule, he never once gave reason to doubt his loyalty to any of his overlords. However, take it away and these people with great joy cling to each other's throats.

            I want you to understand one thing: in fact, and the other, in fact, do not care about the people. Just because of their specifics, the siloviki cannot just as well be legalized in the West as their "colleagues" from the economic sector, and therefore they are forced to somehow correlate all their actions with the interests of the population of the territory that is under their jurisdiction. This is a necessary measure, which nevertheless plays into the hands of us - ordinary citizens. The only question is why for 20 years the emphasis in the ruling elite has not been shifted in their favor. After all, I draw your attention to the fact that representatives of both the one and the other power groups have retained their key posts in the new government, even despite the fact that the request for the creation of nationally-minded capital by society has long been formed.
            1. depressant 25 January 2020 14: 25 New
              • 7
              • 5
              +2
              Dante, bribed, how clearly you articulated the position and state of the views of the security forces. Recently I had a chance to hear from a retired general: "If a revolution begins from below, we officers will be in the forefront." I believe that this leads to high-profile criminal cases against officers of one or another branch of power, and there are few cases against large civilian figures.
              Of course, it is difficult to rock our population from below, to one degree or another, penetrated by petty-bourgeois psychology from deeply Soviet times, even in its most destitute part, but it is possible. To do this, it’s enough to adopt a series of stupid laws. Deputies lobbied by interested parties will do so willingly.
      2. Van 16 25 January 2020 08: 14 New
        • 26
        • 7
        +19
        An article that Putin is our everything, and if anyone is against it, then he is on a par with Navalny, Yavlinsky and even Gorbachev. And as always, Ukraine is an example.
    2. novobranets 25 January 2020 07: 56 New
      • 12
      • 13
      -1
      Quote: Uran53
      there is no "cardinal change of course." Rather, a "bone" for people.

      Just a bone with a meat stamp was torn from those representatives of the authorities who have dual citizenship, real estate, etc., over the hill. Who slept and saw how they grabbed, dash with the dough on the Cote d'Azur. From under the liberals running for a salary at the Embassy of America, they knocked out a stool. Now it’s not even possible to become a deputy with two passports, isn’t that about this, more recently, there was a heated debate, demanding to remove such people from running the country? Fulfilled, again dissatisfied. Gentlemen, you decide what you want. I, again, am not a fan of Putin, but I also see how long the GDP has set the stage for this step, and you want everything at once. It doesn’t work out that way.
      1. 2 Level Advisor 25 January 2020 08: 23 New
        • 19
        • 5
        +14
        Vyacheslav, here answer a simple question .. There is, for example, the federal law "On Civil Service" where the requirements for a civil servant are spelled out .. question:
        1. Why change the Constitution if you can just supplement the law? In this case, everything will also work. I will say more, after amendments to the Constitution, this law will be amended this way.
        2. Why are these changes only now, in 2020, and not in 2010, for example? What, before with 2 citizenship all the rules were?
        And my conclusion .. all these changes are tinsel! They can be made without the Constitution-Laws! the main reason for all this is the State Council, which if introduced into the Constitution, just like that, no one will disperse without a referendum.
        1. AUL
          AUL 25 January 2020 09: 08 New
          • 16
          • 3
          +13
          Quote: 2 level advisor
          And my conclusion .. all these changes are tinsel! They can be made without the Constitution-Laws! the main reason for all this is the State Council, which if introduced into the Constitution, just like that, no one will disperse without a referendum.

          IMHO, this is done to spread responsibility. The fact that the number of "decision centers" will increase is a bluff! Everyone understands where and by whom decisions will actually be made. But then there will be no one to ask later for the consequences of these decisions - they will nod at each other.
          By the way, it would be nice to introduce into the new Constitution (which will be adopted with enthusiasm 76% of the vote wink ) clause on the limitation of the term of the head of the State Council, for example, 4 years and no more without a "row". Oh, dreams, dreams ...
          The second time we are already changing the Constitution for a specific person. The trend, however!
          1. Ross xnumx 25 January 2020 09: 59 New
            • 12
            • 3
            +9
            Quote: AUL
            The second time we are already changing the Constitution for a specific person. The trend, however!

            A strange tendency and vicious practice.
        2. novobranets 25 January 2020 09: 09 New
          • 5
          • 17
          -12
          Nicholas, the Constitution is the foundation of the state. Well, let's say, the skeleton, and laws are an application to it, we will call muscles. Unsuccessful analogy, but did not come up with a more suitable one. I think that laws will also change or supplement over time. Now, as I see it, Putin wants to cut off the pro-Western riffraff from the government, I think that after a turn comes the major purge of the government. I hope so. hi
          1. 2 Level Advisor 25 January 2020 10: 04 New
            • 7
            • 2
            +5
            Well, let's step back from the design of this legal project and make sense of how it works and why ...
            1. Protection from enemy agents in power. You know, I’m sure that now there are foreign intelligence agents in power. In addition, it is almost unbelievable that they have a second citizenship — intelligence of the enemy, I think not fools — to have an agent who has a direct, undisguised relationship with foreign countries. If he needs to escape, he will be given citizenship, I think no one has. So this is unlikely to affect them.
            2. Protection against just enemies / thieves of the country in power. Well .. he will not have citizenship, he will have his wife, which in most countries, when he escapes to the country where his wife has citizenship, automatically gives him a residence permit as the wife of a citizen, immediately after contacting the authorities. And then citizenship, after a few years. In many countries, this scheme works not only for the spouse, but also for the parents.
            Total, I DO NOT SEE how this norm will work FACT! Then the wife also needs a ban on second citizenship, otherwise there will be a minister, for example, with a wife a US citizen, and this will be within the framework of the Constitution.
            But with a bunch of minuses of the USSR, I just can’t imagine that the minister had a wife-citizen of another country. And there will be no ban on this, even after these amendments.
            And that is why I say, the only thing that changes the norm in the project is the State Council, the rest-populism-is legally easy to circumvent. If the ban is not only on the civil servant, but also on members of his family, then I believe that the GDP of the country is being considered by this project. So far, he, as a lawyer, has veiled the essence very well and I don’t think that family members will appear in the project.
            1. novobranets 25 January 2020 10: 16 New
              • 3
              • 5
              -2
              Unfortunately, we have a minimum of information, more precisely, the necessary minimum level, in order to predict the next steps in GDP. With all its drawbacks, hardly anyone would call him stupid, and it is likely that he has already thought through the following steps to enable him to achieve the desired result (it is possible to include close relatives on the list at the level of the law). It remains only to speculate on guesses, because it is very difficult to predict, there are too many constantly changing variables in this equation. Personally, I think a lot cannot be expected from this change, but I hope for some kind of small positive.
              1. depressant 25 January 2020 14: 48 New
                • 7
                • 4
                +3
                And I have no doubt that the amendment on citizenship will not affect the wives and children of officials. What will be motivated by humanism. Like, we are not animals! And globalization, however. And none of the voting deputies will accept the idea that if your relatives are citizens of another state, and your financial situation is therefore strengthened there, and not here, then the official will be the soul and thoughts with that state, and not with Russia. And it will act in his interests. Hence my opinion. The amendment has zero exhaust. It is directed against a specific group of oligarchs with whom Putin never found a common language. They did not persuade them to invest in Russia, but they lay claim to the highest power in the country and to key posts. That is, he excluded the possibility of a power seizure of power. In his opinion. In my opinion, no. They want, capture. In the meantime, they have enough purchased deputies and officials. They will seize and change the Constitution. Without asking us. Just confronting the fact.
            2. Sergej1972 25 January 2020 19: 09 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              To make any demands on parents and children, as well as the spouses of candidates for public office, utter nonsense. This is a violation of human rights. The exception is minor children. By the way, the next of kin can be political opponents by opinion. And they can have their own political, economic and other ambitions. Incidentally, they themselves may well apply for positions in the civil service system, and put forward their candidatures for elected posts.
              1. 2 Level Advisor 26 January 2020 08: 24 New
                • 0
                • 1
                -1
                I’m talking about this, the proposed norm sounds cool, but it won’t work, it's a dummy.
                Sergei, do you think the wives of thievish officials, they are “successful” businesswoman and their children who stole money “you know who my dad is?” Will have very different views than the official? well, perhaps, at best, 10 percent of them ..
          2. Mustached Kok 25 January 2020 20: 05 New
            • 6
            • 3
            +3
            So we have the whole pro-Western government. All leadership policy, since the collapse. It deals with only one thing, selling the Soviet heritage and reducing the role of the state in human life. More and more around us are companies of different oligarchs and deputies, that the state is replacing us for money. Since P appeared in power, the number of ministerial rearrangements has been numerous. Reforms are even greater. But they all benefited. The same pension reform is the work of his hands and the government of his friends.
            And which of the published laws "cleans" the power from the "Westerners".
  • Pessimist22 25 January 2020 05: 30 New
    • 19
    • 14
    +5
    They changed the government, now we need to wait a bit, to improve, to suffer, otherwise it will be like in Ukraine. For twenty years they have been rubbing the same thing.
    1. Far East 25 January 2020 07: 33 New
      • 16
      • 7
      +9
      But how much more can you endure !? us, and so bent!
  • Mihail55 25 January 2020 05: 47 New
    • 17
    • 12
    +5
    How much can confuse foreign and domestic policy ??? If the outside has become better for us, then what is it with us, dear? Country for us or we for her ??? There is no answer ... And this is not a revolution. Initially, they put the new prime minister in a certain framework ... a pensioner ... progressive tax, etc. You will not be spoiled! The presence of Belousov is unlikely to change anything. And I would like to see changes in our everyday routine during my life ... And for this we need revolutions ??? Just to make insolent bureaucrats WORK the authorities are still not enough ???
    1. depressant 25 January 2020 15: 05 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Michael 55, you wanted to say "no progressive tax"?
      And how do you like this law, just adopted by the State Duma: after a divorce, the father is now obliged to pay not only child support, but also to pay housing for the child. That's the whole demography! Given the low salaries and unemployment. I don’t know about you, but I feel sorry for such a father.
      1. Sergej1972 25 January 2020 19: 14 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Can you give a link to the fact that such a law has been adopted? Is this not another initiative of individual deputies? In this case, if the child was left with his father, in theory, should his mother pay for the housing?
      2. CT-55_11-9009 26 January 2020 19: 43 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: depressant
        I don’t know about you, but I feel sorry for such a father.

        Not for me! My father is an alimony, and he is malicious. Rare and bastard. And in life. And there are a lot of such freaks, evading not only from alimony, but from elementary help to the child from another marriage! So I am ABSOLUTELY not a pity!
  • zyablik.olga 25 January 2020 06: 00 New
    • 27
    • 13
    +14
    The current government is only concerned with the preservation of power and actually slows down the development of the country. The best thing the president could do now is to step down with the government. But this will not happen, and he will hold on to power with his teeth, because he is afraid of responsibility.
    1. Kleber 25 January 2020 06: 30 New
      • 18
      • 10
      +8
      What responsibility is he afraid of? And most importantly, to whom to answer? Anyway, his henchman will come in his place. And the responsibility will be the same as that of Yeltsin, i.e. no. It is not offensive, but it is.
    2. olpin51 25 January 2020 07: 42 New
      • 6
      • 13
      -7
      Aw .... The government is gone. Who did this?
      And what is afraid is right. We are all afraid of something new, unpredictable.
      1. Ross xnumx 25 January 2020 10: 36 New
        • 12
        • 2
        +10
        Sorry to change the order of presentation.
        Quote: olpin51
        We are all afraid of something new, unpredictable.

        You can talk about us for a long time, but I’ll say what ordinary people are afraid of, not burdened by state duties and property taxes. All of them do not want their disenfranchised position, indicated by decrees, laws, articles and regulations, to change for the worse. At the end of life, they managed to achieve a "precarious balance." This suits them because of the cardinal changes that they were in the 90s they simply will not survive. A vivid example of the older generation, dying of hunger, abandoned to its fate. It was this “new”, such “unpredictable” that they drew with a caricature change of government.
        Here are those who decided to “wait” for milk from a cow male, tell us what events inspired you such confidence? Maybe that Medvedev and Co., after the liberation of state seats, received a stiff replacement for them in the form of stools and wooden loungers fastened for the day? According to merit, so to speak ... For the failure of the assigned business ... For "there is no money, but you hold on" with a surplus budget ... Nothing of the kind. This fact is not only alarming, but also suggests that the cart in a cart without changes.
        As for the younger people, they are only afraid that it is difficult to discern worthy people in our vast country. Some dominance of empty, worthless, unusable, cynical villains who usurped the right to dispose of other people's lives ...

        Quote: olpin51
        And what is afraid is right.

        The authorities are afraid of the truth. He is afraid that literate people will appear and publicly prove to those who are still “zombied” with promises and promises that the real power is not the elite and cream of society at all, but the most ordinary “foam” that lies on the surface of a society in an unstable state.
        But, most importantly, she is afraid of losing this right to legislate, indicate, and dispose of. Because in their life they have not learned anything but serving the bosses and humiliating their subordinates.
  • parusnik 25 January 2020 06: 13 New
    • 25
    • 9
    +16
    Those. as it was before the "reforms": not liberal power, under the pressure of liberals, adopted liberal laws and it infuriated liberals. Accepted laws under pressure of liberals, not liberal power will not change, and this again infuriates liberals .. The author writes for several years about impeachment dear to his heart, the American president, “it’s already midnight, but German is still gone,” but not today, tomorrow is a civil war ... in the USA ... laughing
    1. Ross xnumx 25 January 2020 10: 47 New
      • 10
      • 1
      +9
      Quote: parusnik
      Those. as it was before the "reforms": not liberal power, under the pressure of liberals, adopted liberal laws and it infuriated liberals. Accepted laws under pressure of liberals, not liberal power will not change, and this again infuriates liberals ..

      Who are these "liberals" under the pressure of whom laws were passed? Who is “not a liberal” in Putin’s power structures? Putin himself said that Russia will not turn from the path of a liberal market economy. You will then agree to the end - "Russian pro-Western liberals." It is thanks to them that we have what we have.
      In a situation when the so-called transit of power is being analyzed - the usual replacement of frayed, shabby chess pieces on the board of hundred-cell checkers, it is not clear what the rules of the game are, the rules of the arrangement of pieces are incomprehensible and he himself washed away this arrangement.
      1. parusnik 25 January 2020 17: 47 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        hi Greetings! ... My fault, in the right places, did not put emoticons denoting sarcasm smile And so, here it’s not chess pieces, but a speckled deck of cards with 8 aces, so I wrote about this in the comments ... and more than once ... smile hi
  • sagitch 25 January 2020 07: 29 New
    • 16
    • 4
    +12
    The revolution is too loudly said. Fasting castling.
  • The collective farm 25 January 2020 07: 58 New
    • 10
    • 21
    -11
    As if Putin hadn’t been casterized .. But remember what kind of Russia did he accept?
    The poor, humiliated with blood, choking and almost on the verge of collapse .. And what it is now, not quite deiocratic, as the West and neoliberals would like, but still moving forward .. Putin will leave, don’t worry, maybe soon .. But Russia needs stability and so that without world wars .. (we know how to fight and always get into all the world squabbles) How would we this time aside to observe how the United States in the second world ..
    1. Stils 25 January 2020 09: 17 New
      • 20
      • 4
      +16
      From that Russia, the sample of 1999, it was possible to dazzle what you want, freedom of speech, thought was enough, but apart from sliding into authoritarianism, maintaining personal power, Putin did not choose. This is not creative, it is a repressive choice. If we ignore the “Putin cookies” (which, incidentally, are due to the raw materials market, there is no merit in this), the country is going to the wrong place, the wrong one ... To disentangle the next generation ...
      1. The collective farm 25 January 2020 12: 28 New
        • 5
        • 12
        -7
        Quote: Stils
        From that Russia, the sample of 1999, it was possible to dazzle what you want, freedom of speech, thought was enough, but besides slipping into authoritarianism, maintaining personal power,

        Do you remember TU Russia 90s? Terrorist attacks Chechnya yelling akbar that we are going to Moscow, etc. Berezovsky with his smile and K.
        There is gangster lawlessness in the country, shooting in Moscow, and even in the province ... corpses of lawlessness .. etc.

        Quote: Stils
        Putin did not choose. It is not creative, it is repressive

        If Putin gave the order, then people like you would shut up right away ..
        You are here about the "dermocracy" ..
        In Russia, we also have "creative NKVD and SMERSH."
        So be careful here to yell and even more so in the west .. bully
    2. Ingvar 72 25 January 2020 09: 50 New
      • 18
      • 5
      +13
      Quote: Collective Farm
      As if Putin hadn’t been casterized .. But remember what kind of Russia did he accept?

      Let's compare the Russia of the 90s with a sick person. The healing process is inherent in every person by nature. And here there are three options for recovery - natural, accelerated by treatment, and regressive when there is recovery, but very slow, due to the influence of external negative factors that inhibit the process of regeneration of the body.
      At the moment, the country is developing according to the third variant of recovery, if we draw analogies with the human body. And all of Putin’s “achievements” are very, very dubious. hi
      1. atalef 25 January 2020 09: 59 New
        • 3
        • 8
        -5
        Quote: Ingvar 72
        The healing process is inherent in every person by nature. And here there are three options for recovery - natural, accelerated by treatment, and regressive

        recourse
        Regression (lat. Regressio "reverse movement, return") :.

        you braided gyrus?
        Is it like back to the future?

        Quote: Ingvar 72
        At the moment, the country's development is on the third option for recovery

        sad
        1. Ingvar 72 25 January 2020 10: 45 New
          • 12
          • 0
          +12
          Hello Leo Orthodox. hi What did you want to say? That I didn’t insert the word, or did the meaning not reach you?
          1. atalef 25 January 2020 11: 03 New
            • 2
            • 6
            -4
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Hi Levoslav

            And you do not get sick, faithful

            Quote: Ingvar 72
            What did you want to say? That I didn’t insert the word, or did the meaning not reach you?

            both
            hi
            1. rich 26 January 2020 03: 42 New
              • 4
              • 1
              +3
              Quote: Ingvar 72: Hello Levoslav

              Quote: atalef: And you do not get sick, faithful

              boys to the right, girls to the left laughing
          2. The collective farm 25 January 2020 12: 31 New
            • 7
            • 11
            -4
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Hello Leo Orthodox. hi What did you want to say? That I didn’t insert the word, or did the meaning not reach you?

            Yes, forum users from Israel just to spit in the direction of Russia .. Nostalgia for them)))))
      2. Dante Alighieri 25 January 2020 12: 58 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        And here there are three options for recovery - natural, accelerated by treatment, and regressive when there is recovery, but very slow, due to the influence of external negative factors that inhibit the process of regeneration of the body.

        You forgot about remission - the period of the course of a chronic disease, which is manifested by a significant weakening (incomplete remission) or disappearance (complete remission) of its symptoms. So there are four options, not three. Incomplete remission, by the way, also suits the situation we are considering.
        1. Ingvar 72 25 January 2020 20: 05 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          Quote: Dante
          You forgot about remission - the period of the course of a chronic disease,

          This is what I meant by the third option. Thanks for the amendment. hi
    3. Ross xnumx 25 January 2020 11: 04 New
      • 16
      • 1
      +15
      Quote: Collective Farm
      No matter how Putin was casterized ..But remember which Russia he took ?

      Before bonfiring or discussing someone, let's just change your favorite phrase:
      “But, remember what his predecessors and associates brought Russia to before the EBN handed over the reins to Putin”.
      One could talk about Putin's merits if, in the government entrusted to him, he would get rid of that superficial that destroyed the statehood of the USSR. Russia is not the antipode of the Soviet Union, but its (as stated) SUCCESSOR !!!
      Now look around and tell us why the successor was destroyed by the economy by transferring enterprises and industries to private hands? What has improved for the country's population?
      Having understood that the Russian people are gradually realizing (will understand) the benefits of Putin's "economic" transformations and can simply pay what they deserve, ONE decided that the state power should be equipped so that even a new, truly popular president could neither change nor decide in terms of worsening the situation of all these newly-born "people's servants."
      Only, either the people became more literate, then everyone was tired of reacting to screams: “Wolves! Wolves! " "Sanctions! Sanctions! Ukraine! Ukraine! ”- but, consciousness began to return. And it won’t succeed in fogging it with a show circus ...
      1. The collective farm 25 January 2020 12: 39 New
        • 3
        • 14
        -11
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Before bonfiring or discussing someone, let's just change your favorite phrase:
        “But, remember what his predecessors and associates brought Russia to before the EBN transferred the reins of power to Putin” ...

        Ukraine appeared 7))))
        Quote: ROSS 42
        Only, either the people became more literate, then everyone was tired of reacting to cries: “Wolves! Wolves! " "Sanctions! Sanctions! Ukraine! Ukraine! ”- but, consciousness began to return. And it won’t succeed in fogging it with a show circus ...

        But now Ukraine is being conceived in the world as a state praising the Nazis, and despite the fact that Jews are in power and financial flows ..

        How do you like this?
        Ukraine, do not wake up to take on .. Let the bastards themselves each other with \ devour!
        PS Cleansing of Kiev will be authorized by Donbass officials .. We will cover them in Russia! soldier
        We will block all the airspace and borders ..
        1. Dante Alighieri 25 January 2020 13: 09 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Well, now Ukraine is associated in the world as a state praising the Nazis

          No need to isolate the Russians and the rest of the world. Many countries of Europe after Crimea are very sympathetic to them, I am silent about the States and Canada (which, as everyone knows, is the northernmost region of the Independent). But for some reason I’m sure that most countries of the world treat Ukraine simply neutrally. What can we say in most of the former Union republics with the current Ukrainian authorities, these are quite neutral business relations that are far from shaking hands. So let's not broadcast our attitude to all other members of the international community. It is at least dishonest to ourselves.
        2. Ross xnumx 25 January 2020 14: 00 New
          • 13
          • 2
          +11
          Quote: Collective Farm
          We will block all the airspace and borders ..

          One feels the style of the site of a certain “khe-khe” adequate citizen known among old-timers.
          In our topic, Ukraine is not fastened by any side, okromya "casual".
          And therefore it is necessary to understand their own problems. We must become kind and attractive ourselves, and people (and not partners) will be drawn to us ...
          hi
          1. The collective farm 25 January 2020 14: 56 New
            • 4
            • 13
            -9
            Quote: ROSS 42
            One feels the style of the site of a certain “khe-khe” adequate citizen known among old-timers.
            In our topic, Ukraine is not fastened by any side, okromya "casual".

            Well, today I have a son in biathlon took second place .. The wind with frost is creepy .. But he shot clearly !! hi
            The hand does not flinch! Me too .. soldier
          2. Edik 26 January 2020 06: 35 New
            • 3
            • 5
            -2
            Quote: ROSS 42
            In our topic, Ukraine is not fastened by any side, okromya "casual".
            And therefore it is necessary to understand their own problems. We must become kind and attractive ourselves, and people (and not partners) will be drawn to us ...

            Just in your topic Ukraine rises to its full height! Such as YOU whined, whined, whined, and whined at all corners and toilets, and then putting money in their pocket they went to the Maidan! Well, what did they stop stealing? whining people like you remember! And I well remember how many corpses on people like you! drinks
  • Mihail55 25 January 2020 08: 07 New
    • 7
    • 4
    +3
    Interesting business smile I read the comments. The bulk are not very happy with the article. BUT ... for some reason they plus - they minus our scribble almost exactly !!! smile Or write one, think another ... Riddle. And on the topic. Even before 2024. FOUR more years! Che twitching? Prove by BUSINESS that you are power! Weak ??? Let us recall KRYMNASH - how great it became in my soul !!! Or are you walking in the columns of the Immortal regiment and around a sea of ​​people .. in memory !!! OK!!! Well, roll up your expensive sleeves BOYARA ... ay
    1. Ross xnumx 25 January 2020 14: 05 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: Michael55
      Even before 2024. FOUR more years! Che twitching? Prove by BUSINESS that you are power! Weak ??? Let us recall KRYMNASH - how great it became in my soul !!! Or are you walking in the columns of the Immortal regiment and around a sea of ​​people .. in memory !!! OK!!! Well, roll up your expensive sleeves BOYARA ... ay

      good
      Great thoughts. That is exactly what those who are not on the couch today, but at work think. What, in fact, are trying to "stir up"? Changed the "awl" to "soap" publican? belay
  • nm76 25 January 2020 08: 21 New
    • 10
    • 21
    -11
    After yesterday’s article, when Putin raised his soldier’s cap and pride for the supreme in every subsequent commentary, I realized that they were ready to forgive a lot for this act, even pension reform ...
    But in fact, almost everyone who forgave Putin this unpopular reform has long been retired, and it’s not just one pension that matters.
    It’s clear that Putin is a good man and that he has done a lot for Russia, but a good man is not a panacea, and on the other side of the scales there is what could be done ...
    It is clear that he is not physically eternal, however, like the elites surrounding him are not eternal for a number of reasons ...
    So the faster the complete transformation of power takes place, the faster we will begin to live according to the new rules. Now we are just delaying the end of the inevitable ...
  • GRIGORIY76 25 January 2020 08: 22 New
    • 17
    • 4
    +13
    By the way, the State Duma has already voted for the new amendments, spitting on the opinion of the people.
    Are you sure that there will be a referendum? But what if the people vote against the amendments? Will they be canceled?
    Volodin was asked about this, it’s so awkward of him ...
    1. Boris55 25 January 2020 10: 00 New
      • 6
      • 13
      -7
      Quote: GRIGORIY76
      Are you sure that there will be a referendum?

      Did someone declare a referendum?

      Constitution of the Russian Federation, Art. 84
      c) call a referendum in the manner prescribed by federal constitutional law;

      Federal Constitutional Law of June 28.06.2004, 5 No. 18.06.2017-FKZ (as amended on June XNUMX, XNUMX)
      "On the referendum of the Russian Federation"

      14 Article. Referendum initiative
      1. The referendum initiative belongs to:
      1) at least two million citizens of the Russian Federation entitled to participate in a referendum, provided that no more than 50 thousand of them reside in the territory of one subject of the Russian Federation or in aggregate outside the territory of the Russian Federation;

      Who announced the referendum? Someone announced the collection of signatures?
      1. New Year day 26 January 2020 07: 57 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Quote: Boris55
        . The referendum initiative belongs to:
        1) at least two million citizens of the Russian Federation eligible to participate in a referendum

        You have gathered the necessary benefit of the referendum on the abolition of pension reform, where is the referendum?
        We have the law turned like a drawbar
  • 1536 25 January 2020 08: 35 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Quote: Far In
    But this, in fact, is scary - God forbid Putin decide to crank up the same feint with his ears as Sausages in Kazakhstan ... I’m afraid the people may not tolerate this.

    Firstly, it is necessary to respect the people of a neighboring country and call a spade a spade - Elbasy. Do not respect others, do not respect yourself. And do not speak for the people whom you seem to know nothing and never knew. Secondly, while "feints with ears" are being done by all sorts of "democratically-minded" comrades ", whose faces we have seen for many years, and whose activities have destroyed the very concepts of" democracy "and" liberalism ". However, they persistently continue their activities.
  • nextimen 25 January 2020 09: 02 New
    • 12
    • 2
    +10
    A revolution is a change of the existing system. As was capitalism, so it remained. What kind of revolution are we talking about?
  • Boris55 25 January 2020 09: 02 New
    • 3
    • 23
    -20
    Quote: V. Kamenev
    Vladimir Putin will not be re-elected in 2024, will step down as president, but will continue to lead the “Putin elite” under the new president of Russia ... Putin will leave and remain at the same time!

    In order to understand why this is so, and not otherwise - read an excerpt from the primer, increase political literacy.

    "State policy and management in a crowd-elite society is an agreement reached on the possibilities of various clan-corporate groups in using the state structure and system to achieve their narrowly corporate goals."

    It does not matter who represents the clan-corporate interests in the visible part of the government, it does not matter what his last name is - he will defend the interests of his clan.

    Quote: V. Kamenev
    and the latter infuriates our pro-Western party and other “all-proverbs”: their spells about the collapse of Russia again disappeared.

    And how many are there on the VO site. See how they are in comments, joyfully plus every bad word about Putin, and how vehemently minus the truth about him.

    Quote: V. Kamenev
    Why now?

    They (the pro-Western elite) themselves determined their date of death.
    After it was announced that the president’s message would be January 15th, two days later, they set their meeting on the same date. The question was solved: with whom is the "elite" and if it is with them, then the announcement of the beginning of the counter-revolution to Putin. The overwhelming majority of the "elite" made their choice - it came to the message of the president. The next revolution in Russia is canceled.

    Thanks to the author for the article.
    1. Tank jacket 25 January 2020 10: 00 New
      • 3
      • 13
      -10
      And you, Boris, thanks for the comment. hi
  • Doctor Evil 25 January 2020 09: 20 New
    • 16
    • 5
    +11
    Glory to the Great Putin! These words should end the article. The author should continue to be guided.
  • Paul Siebert 25 January 2020 09: 21 New
    • 13
    • 3
    +10
    But what is this “revolution from above"?
    This is not even the evolution from above to the fullest ...
    The course remains the same. The "presidential republic" remains presidential.
    Half of the government has changed. The people are also ambiguous.
    The people were given a little money from state bins. And then the burning rubber began to smell.
    The government felt a threat from below for itself. And reacted.
    But now the threats - as it never happened. People like wafers discuss "unprecedented prospects."
    Media bosses on all screens perked up. And day and night praise the foresight and foresight.
    Well - we will rejoice!
    Until the next "fateful change" ... wink
  • Yehudi Menuhin 25 January 2020 09: 27 New
    • 8
    • 3
    +5
    Some nonsense.
  • U-58 25 January 2020 09: 27 New
    • 16
    • 1
    +15
    The revolution from above ....
    And what will it give?
    The Ministry of Economic Development appointed M.Reshetnikov.
    An internship in Perm was completed and promoted.
    What did he accomplish in Perm from the point of view of the people?
    Tried to rename the airport.
    The people opposed. Canceled.
    I removed trolleybuses from the streets of Perm. In favor of the bus lobby.
    The most tragic: I decided to destroy the historical and strategically important Goronozavodskaya railway, which is used daily by thousands of Perm and the region's residents. Instead, I was going to build a very long and almost completely uncomfortable detour and build an additional railway bridge for this.
    Permians are indignant, but
    builders from Moscow rub their hands in anticipation ....
    The price is hundreds of billions.
    Reshetnikov Perm came from Moscow with an offensive nickname about interest.
    And the Governor of the Destroyers leaves with the ZAGU.
  • Bambardia 25 January 2020 09: 56 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    Revolution is good. Will the people live better?
    1. AU Ivanov. 25 January 2020 11: 00 New
      • 5
      • 20
      -15
      Every time before the revolution, some rubbish inspires the people that they live sooooo badly. We have already gone through this. Then the people demolish the head of state, overturn their state. As a result: the country collapses, the economy and industry collapse, the civil war and famine begin.
      And only then will the people know what a bad life is.
      1. Cop
        Cop 25 January 2020 19: 23 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Quote: AU Ivanov.
        ..... Then the people demolish the head of state, overturn their state. As a result: the country collapses, the economy and industry collapse, the civil war and famine begin.
        C'mon, Andryusha, did the Finns demolish their ruler and after that there, what did they enter the cards for bread?
        1. 2 Level Advisor 26 January 2020 08: 57 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Andrei, you don’t understand the mood of the people, simply because you belong to the rare species in the country — the middle class .. would you have income — like most people would think differently, and even better, most would be middle class .. this you have nothing and no reason to change .. and people with sn in 20-30tr and without special prospects, are not happy with today's alignment ..
          1. 2 Level Advisor 26 January 2020 11: 34 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            What I agree with you in principle, after all kinds of revolutions of the 1917 type, there is a severe deterioration in the standard of living and such funds are possible if there are absolutely no prospects for improvement.
  • reader65 25 January 2020 10: 07 New
    • 15
    • 3
    +12
    And at this time .....

    Mishustin introduced a salary bonus for security officials for working on protests.
    We are talking about a monthly bonus of up to 100% of the monthly salary "for the complexity of the tasks."

    Now disgruntled will be peeling sticks with a vengeance.
  • Shahno 25 January 2020 10: 35 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    Quote: Uran53
    The duty change of sign (represented by the government) and a couple of slogans are not a “cardinal change of course”. Rather, a "bone" for people.

    For officials around the world, this is their favorite "entertainment" - the illusion of change, both cheaply and angrily ..
  • Karen 25 January 2020 11: 25 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Kamenev ... The surname is iconic ... Like Zinoviev, for example ...
    So, I will wait for the second coming of a certain Georgian for the Russians ... Although ... I’m sure that "they" took their mistakes into account ... they will not allow ...
  • Charlie 25 January 2020 11: 32 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Far In
    But this, in fact, is scary - God forbid Putin decide to crank up the same feint with his ears as Sausages in Kazakhstan ... I’m afraid the people may not tolerate this.

    The people will tolerate. Our people are too patient and fragmented enough to throw out their intolerance
  • svoit 25 January 2020 11: 51 New
    • 1
    • 6
    -5
    Zelensky something too often asks for meetings with Putin

    so the Americans are demanding to know if it’s time to move the ukrovermaht to the Donbass and Crimea, otherwise they give money, but there is no exhaust.
    The Americans are not used to this; they need to work out the pieces of silver.
    and until he eliminates it, he himself will be in constant danger.

    So this is the correct American policy - a “balance of power", let today's vassal know that there is someone to replace him (the biggest thing that Zee can count on is to sign papers and read out speeches completely written in the CIA department of the SBU, but not more). And nobody will give it to Ze.
  • BAI
    BAI 25 January 2020 11: 57 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Some observers call the January 15 reform a “revolution from above." In some ways this metaphor is true: the reforms announced by President Putin significantly change the configuration of the supreme power, redistribute power between the institutions of the president, the State Duma, the government and the State Council. This is a real separation of powers, which the democrats have always talked about, but our "democrats" are terribly unhappy with this, because they are also pro-Western puppets.

    The incumbent president is preparing leverage for himself to maintain control over government action after resigning.
    Only one conclusion can be drawn from this - there is no person in whom he could rely on. There is no one to transfer power to.
  • iouris 25 January 2020 12: 58 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    To read about the revolution from above is, of course, pleasant. And to write about it is inexpensive. If, as they say, Mishustin learned about his appointment at the time of the announcement of the decision (and the others too), then the essence of what is happening will not be clear earlier. Come in three years later - we'll talk.
    You need to live long in the Russian Federation, then you will live to see everything.
  • maden.usmanow 25 January 2020 13: 40 New
    • 10
    • 1
    +9
    They didn’t let my article about the electromagnetic catapult, but does this “creativity” pass quietly?

    Haha
    1. Cop
      Cop 25 January 2020 19: 18 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: maden.usmanow
      They didn’t let my article about the electromagnetic catapult, but does this “creativity” pass quietly?
      Give a link to it, I will read it with pleasure.
      1. maden.usmanow 25 January 2020 22: 01 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        I sent it for moderation yesterday, the admins removed. I printed the article immediately on this site, so the text was not saved.
        The Americans conducted new trials of their aircraft carrier Gerald Ford in January.
        They tested an electromagnetic catapult and an aerofinisher.
        For the first time, heavy ERLA E2A Hawkeye aircraft, C2A Greyhound transporters, T-45 training fighters, and EW E / A 18 Growler aircraft were launched from the deck


        1. Cop
          Cop 30 January 2020 10: 12 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: maden.usmanow

          They tested an electromagnetic catapult and an aerofinisher.
          Good video. Thank. And we even could not really make a steam. Although it seems they made a prototype.
  • Altona 25 January 2020 13: 45 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    All amendments to the Constitution should be through a referendum and the Constitutional Assembly, and as proposed, it is illegal. The constitution is not an instruction for an electric kettle.
    1. iouris 25 January 2020 15: 31 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      Quote: Altona
      The constitution is not an instruction for an electric kettle.

      Do you know how this constitution was adopted? Not?
    2. Sergej1972 25 January 2020 19: 22 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Have you read the Constitution? It all depends on which sections of the Constitution are supposed to be amended. For the amendments that are being discussed, approval by a qualified majority in both houses of the Federal Assembly, followed by approval by the legislative assemblies of at least three quarters of the subjects of the federation, is sufficient.
      1. Altona 26 January 2020 12: 08 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Quote: iouris
        Do you know how this constitution was adopted? Not?

        I know, then I was 24 years old. Then there was no such overwhelming rush, there was a Constitutional Assembly and a vote. Now this is not offered at all.
        Quote: Sergej1972
        For the amendments that are being discussed, approval by a qualified majority in both houses of the Federal Assembly, followed by approval by the legislative assemblies of at least three quarters of the subjects of the federation, is sufficient.

        It is enough to pervert everything, to spoil and say that it was so. Especially those people who can only lie and crap. And these people do not represent me at all. I did not select them. The Federation Council did not elect, did not elect the head of the republic, and voted for the Communist Party from the lower house of the Duma. So let them shove their amendments into their noble places.
        1. Edik 26 January 2020 12: 54 New
          • 2
          • 4
          -2
          Quote: Altona
          I know, then I was 24 years old. Then there was no such overwhelming rush, there was a Constitutional Assembly and a vote. Now this is not offered at all.

          Yes, of course! The moment when one of the young reformers told how he dashed this constitution overnight on his knee is especially interesting! Eugene isn’t funny for you yourself? But I'm sad!
          Quote: Altona
          It is enough to pervert everything, to spoil and say that it was so. Especially those people who can only lie and crap

          Quote: Altona
          And these people do not represent me at all. I did not select them. The Federation Council did not elect, did not elect the head of the republic, and voted for the Communist Party from the lower house of the Duma. So let them shove their amendments into their noble places.

          Here will be an all-Russian vote, take the bulletin and put it wherever you want!
          And what specific amendment annoys you so much?
        2. Sergej1972 26 January 2020 15: 01 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          And where is your vote? In any country, always part of the population votes for the opposition
        3. Sergej1972 26 January 2020 16: 02 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          I voted against this Constitution in 1993, but this does not mean that I am not obliged to obey it. I voted against Yeltsin in 1991 and 1996, against Medvedev in 2008, against Putin in 2000 and 2004 (in 2012 and 2018 I voted for him). Nevertheless, they were still the presidents of my country and I was obliged to comply with their decrees if their action extended to ordinary citizens.
  • Tomich3 25 January 2020 14: 18 New
    • 10
    • 1
    +9
    The article can be described in a few words - “spring has come, summer has come, thanks to Putin for that”)))
  • Karen 25 January 2020 14: 53 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: depressant
    And I have no doubt

    No one doubts how much ... Do you remember in the film “The Crown of the Russian Empire” the moment when the Frenchman instructs his clowns: “Make more noise, gentlemen!”? And today some will be so noisy ...
  • AleBors 25 January 2020 18: 11 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    The stormy orgasm of a pro-author writer? Is the author so naive that he considers what happened to be a revolution from above? In my opinion, this is just a beautiful move, when the ruler’s rating falls.
    I especially liked this one: "They shout" everything is lost "because they really have everything lost, but what else remains for them? Hopes to somehow pass Russia under the external control of the West after Ukraine again disappeared! But you need to work out old grants and somehow earn new ones for your “democratic" needs. " What is paranoia? Russia has long been under external control, and all changes in the Constitution only consolidate power for "friends." Everything is true here: "Putin’s successor, if I may say so, will be his elite grouping in power, distributed between several centers." That is, now it will become impossible to legally change this “elite” in any way.
    So the overall domestic, and foreign policy will remain unchanged. Just look at the "new" government. And as if the author did not want to, but the fate of Ukraine awaits us, only in a less radical and time-consuming way.
    The article is a huge minus.
  • TANKISTONE 25 January 2020 18: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2


    Oh, comrades ...
  • Cop
    Cop 25 January 2020 19: 06 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    In some ways, this metaphor is true ....
    No, Mr. author, this is a banal coup. Because constitutional amendments must be adopted individually.
    Vladimir Putin will not be re-elected in 2024, resigning as president, but will continue to lead the "Putin elite ....."
    It is quite possible. No wonder that they are trying to introduce the provisions on the new body in the form of amendments to the Russian constitution. Apparently Vladimir Vladimirovich is preparing it for himself. Then I will venture to suggest that this very body will be cooler than the presidential one.
    .... hopes for the emergence of a "new Gorbachev"
    Not only the “new Gorbachev”, but also the “new Stalin”. Author, isn’t he sweet to you? If it’s sweet, then who is Vladimir Vladimirovich from your point of view?
    .... feel what a safety margin in Russia then!
    And you do not confuse the president of Russia and Russia itself. It is good for Russia when its presidents come and go, and on their own feet, and not on a gun carriage and in the "funnel." And what did our president not admit to the election of either Navalny or Yavlinsky? Maybe it is in its strength?
    ...... now it’s a very favorable moment for Russia - the foreign policy pressure from our main “partner” has significantly weakened ...
    No, the author, just elections to the State Duma are coming, and the "Edro" ride on them, unless of course the calculation is honest. What then is our .... the leader of the nation will do?
    The January 15 reforms are designed for a very promising future, after Putin.
    And again, there is no Mr. author, designed for Putin's time, since he is going to rule ..... forever.
    Political disturbances in the United States will inevitably affect their satellites ....
    And how did they affect Russia, especially judging by our GDP (Gross Domestic Product). So it turns out that we are their satellites? Mr. Kamenev, you need to take a more responsible approach to writing articles .... Or are employers ... pushing you? laughing
  • Mustached Kok 25 January 2020 19: 41 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Since when have the theatrical changes in power become a "revolution"?
    The illusion of change for the sake of creating a background of "non-authoritarianism." The whole resignation (and then, not all ministers, but only half) and the new laws. No more than populism.
    Although no, you know, there are changes, now any person who becomes president after Putin will be more limited in authority. It seems good, but not for the fact that the GDP could manipulate the work of the next president through the Duma, which is still the same people.
    And the new amendments ... not new ... either these are insignificant changes (like maternity capital, which is a struggle with the consequences, and not with the cause of the demographic decline), or what has already been just written down in the constitution.
    And if all this is a “revolution from above for good," then what prevented him from doing the same thing earlier?!?!?!
  • Amper 25 January 2020 19: 54 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: Fan-Fan
    Here’s a “balm” for your pet’s achievements, eat, don’t slap it:
    1. 50 billion for the Olympics, of course it’s a beautiful thing, but he used it only so that his friends “laundered” the money and show off in front of the world.
    2. Events in Ukraine in general showed an extremely unattractive picture: the salvation of the “president-urkagan” on the one hand and the refusal to completely defeat Bandera in the Donbass.
    3. Support for the decision of the Crimean population on the one hand, and denial of the same support to other Russians in Ukraine.
    4. Many beautiful words, many patriotic slogans, annual participation in the procession of the "Immortal Regiment" on the one hand, and on the other hand, a complete disregard for the interests of those who are still alive - the memorable Pension Reform.
    5. Absolutely amorphous management and no control over the activities of ministers, heads of agencies and departments.
    6. Astronomical amounts of bribes and theft in all, steal billions. But at the same time, the perpetrators of all these crimes do not bear absolutely no punishment.
    7. In addition to the conveyor selling natural resources operating at the Stakhanov pace, nothing outstanding is observed in the country.
    8. The poorer population, the population fleeing the country, the natural population decline is growing, last year we fell by 300 thousand, the people are simply dying out.

    Two words about Sochi LLC. The man who was invited to participate in the master, in the second week, escaped from the sphere of dormostroy. It became creepy ... Guess why? See also personal participation and the construction results of Vostochny.
  • Amper 25 January 2020 19: 56 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Dr. Evil
    Glory to the Great Putin! These words should end the article. The author should continue to be guided.

    Do not even jokingly throw such words! Suddenly he will understand at face value he or our ancestors!
  • Amper 25 January 2020 20: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Altona
    All amendments to the Constitution should be through a referendum and the Constitutional Assembly, and as proposed, it is illegal. The constitution is not an instruction for an electric kettle.

    Mm ....!? Authors without notice to the reader are allowed to modify the content in the interests of the manufacturer.
  • Amper 25 January 2020 20: 07 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    Quote: iouris
    To read about the revolution from above is, of course, pleasant. And to write about it is inexpensive. If, as they say, Mishustin learned about his appointment at the time of the announcement of the decision (and the others too), then the essence of what is happening will not be clear earlier. Come in three years later - we'll talk.
    You need to live long in the Russian Federation, then you will live to see everything.

    Quote: iouris
    To read about the revolution from above is, of course, pleasant. And to write about it is inexpensive. If, as they say, Mishustin learned about his appointment at the time of the announcement of the decision (and the others too), then the essence of what is happening will not be clear earlier. Come in three years later - we'll talk.
    You need to live long in the Russian Federation, then you will live to see everything.

    Taxman at the helm of the government !? Crouch the blue-footed!
    Picking - no building, no talent! There are some questions, the redhead will tell you how to tighten!
  • Amper 25 January 2020 20: 11 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Revolution!!!?? Those. radical restructuring of production and social relations in the state !? In which place? More details please from this place! Drain the "lake" !?
  • Nikolai Korovin 26 January 2020 00: 12 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    They say that it is impossible to change the constitution from a floundering bay!
    As it was written, so it is necessary to change. And do not breed creepy about the priority of international law.
  • vel1163 26 January 2020 01: 45 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Very pleased with the comments. Everyone understands. There is no revolution from above and cannot be. The power block in the government and the economic one does not change. "And you, friends, no matter how you sit down, everyone is not good at musicians."
  • unknown 26 January 2020 07: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    All revolutions are ALWAYS carried out from above. Revolutions ALWAYS require organization, financing, material support. No lower classes were NEVER capable of this.
    1. CT-55_11-9009 26 January 2020 20: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: ignoto
      All revolutions are ALWAYS carried out from above.

      No. Not always. Revolutions took place from below when there was from above ... Well, the scribe, in short, had no control, power and will at all. We recall Louis 18th and WFR and the Provisional Government and WOSR. I don’t take Nicholas II into account, because in this case there really was a revolution from above ..
  • Paranoid50 26 January 2020 11: 47 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    Yes, Victor, it turned out interestingly. yes Just messed with a spoon, and shit like boils ... fellow But in general, the roll call was successful - the whole shobla got out, including corrupt runners, such as greasy mattress toppers and six-end electricians.
    The swamp worries ONCE
    Swamp worries TWO
    The swamp worries THREE ...
    Tsyts, liberda, snot erase.

    hi
  • Comrade Kim 26 January 2020 21: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Edik
    Quote: Fan-Fan
    "The number of highly qualified specialists emigrated from Russia increased from 20 thousand in 2013 to 44 thousand in 2016

    There is also reverse immigration to Russia and from Europe and from the USA and it is comparable with the figures given by you! But for some reason you were not informed about this ...


    Return migration from Europe and the USA is repeatedly, by orders of magnitude, blocked by hordes of uneducated illegal migrants.
    Try driving in the Moscow metro in the morning - 70% of passengers look like representatives of Central Asia.
    So, it turns out that highly qualified specialists go abroad, and poorly educated people with an alien worldview come.
    And then we get a surge of crime, drug addiction killings and rape.

    “If we take the general statistics and divide by the number of rapes, who commits them, then 75% are made by non-Moscow region visitors. 90% of them come from Asian countries: Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan.”- said Trubnikov.
    But the authorities and business are satisfied. Their children study in London, their houses behind high ruble fences.


    https://ria.ru/20160825/1475238398.html
  • Roman070280 27 January 2020 15: 24 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    it’s enough to look at the neighboring pro-European country, with which the population has been running around for several years in search of earnings throughout Europe, but this does not affect its sustainability - Feel what a safety margin in Russia then!


    Yes, no ..
    If at least something unites a neighboring country - the same hatred of Russia, the desire to take revenge, etc. .. what unites us with Kadyrov ??
    Well, I understand that I’ll hurt many people - is it really that I (if honestly) are interested in some Sakhalin, Kamchatka, or the Chukchi in the north ??
    No, I certainly don’t mind that we live everything (in any case, still in one country, etc. .. but I don’t see any reserve of strength in the form of inextricable links .. Maybe someone and otherwise, but I don’t see anyone in my surroundings who would suddenly “climb onto the barricades” if tomorrow, let Kazan / Peter decide to secede or something like that ..
    Ordinary people are no longer up to this in our country ..
  • honest people 28 January 2020 19: 23 New
    • 1
    • 5
    -4
    Quote: Edik
    Quote: lexus
    You do not spend balm there. Much lower and on the other hand smear. So that later it will not break.

    Don’t wait! While I watch how it’s burning here wink So who do you have there now svetoch, savior of Russia? On YouTube there are a lot of them, but a small cart winked

    We look