The State Duma denied rumors about the dissolution of parliament

The State Duma denied rumors about the dissolution of parliament

The State Duma of the Russian Federation will not be prematurely dissolved, all the rumors spread by foreign media are fakes. This was stated by State Duma Chairman Vyacheslav Volodin.


Volodin called the publication of a possible early dissolution of the State Duma an intervention in Russia's sovereign affairs, saying that these rumors are stuffing from foreign media. At the same time, he drew attention to the fact that some Russian publications picked up the fake.

Our media picked up. In this case, no one indicates the sources. We spoke about this again yesterday in the course of communication with reporters, and we consider it unacceptable to interfere in the affairs of sovereign states. We do not interfere in their affairs, and let them not interfere with us.

- he said.

The first to hear rumors about the early dissolution of the State Duma at a plenary session was the attention of the leader of the LDPR, Vladimir Zhirinovsky. He urged his colleagues to “not listen and not follow the lead” of these speculations.

The State Duma noted that in most cases of fake distribution, the Russian media do not indicate the source of the information.

Earlier, the Kommersant newspaper, referring to its own source close to the presidential administration, reported that the Kremlin did not preclude early parliamentary elections. According to the source of the publication, self-dissolution will help the State Duma "again catch the wave of popular love and hold elections against its background."
Photos used:
Kremlin.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

76 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. the finish 21 January 2020 14: 17 New
    • 23
    • 6
    +17
    But it would be nice!
    1. GKS 2111 21 January 2020 14: 24 New
      • 25
      • 4
      +21
      Quote: finish
      self-dissolution will help the State Duma "to catch the wave of popular love again and hold elections against its background."

      What, excuse me? I heard rightly about people's love? Love ???
      1. sergo1914 21 January 2020 14: 28 New
        • 8
        • 3
        +5
        Quote: GKS 2111
        Quote: finish
        self-dissolution will help the State Duma "to catch the wave of popular love again and hold elections against its background."

        What, excuse me? I heard rightly about people's love? Love ???



        The key phrase here is "catch again." She flew away, but promised to return ...
        1. Mar.Tirah 21 January 2020 15: 27 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Quote: sergo1914
          The key phrase here is "catch again." She flew away, but promised to return ...

          She never was from the people. The main thing is to like the president, but to talk about lobbying other people's interests. For the corresponding bonuses, respectively. A little more and half of the Russian population will become criminals who violate their laws in order to survive ..
          1. sergo1914 21 January 2020 16: 53 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            Quote: Mar. Tira
            Quote: sergo1914
            The key phrase here is "catch again." She flew away, but promised to return ...

            She never was from the people. The main thing is to like the president, but to talk about lobbying other people's interests. For the corresponding bonuses, respectively. A little more and half of the Russian population will become criminals who violate their laws in order to survive ..


            Fishing, mushrooms, berries, deadwood?
            1. Mar.Tirah 21 January 2020 17: 10 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: sergo1914
              Fishing, mushrooms, berries, deadwood?

              In vain ironize. And this too.
      2. depressant 21 January 2020 14: 35 New
        • 10
        • 1
        +9
        Yeah)) So bluntly said, caused a smile. Rather, the Duma thought about what to choose - permanent residence in a foreign country or a heated chair in the penates, but thought out loud between themselves. Someone from the journalists heard, and away we go. Or, perhaps, a rumor has been purposely launched to infiltrate the Wild West - a frightened thinker votes “better”.
      3. YOUR 21 January 2020 14: 52 New
        • 5
        • 1
        +4
        It will be so
      4. tihonmarine 21 January 2020 15: 08 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Quote: GKS 2111
        Quote: finish
        self-dissolution will help the State Duma "to catch the wave of popular love again and hold elections against its background."

        What, excuse me? I heard rightly about people's love? Love ???

        How can you escape from the feeder? Dissolution of the Duma, the largest fake since its inception. You can only say in the words of Dybenko, "The guard is tired." Love passed, tomatoes wilted.
      5. Paul Siebert 21 January 2020 16: 25 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        I heard right, people's love? Love ???

        Yes - love!
        Over the past three years, managed to fall in love with people to death!
        People no longer know what to think ...
        Around the fiery Duma love ... even a wolf howl. wink
      6. Nyrobsky 21 January 2020 16: 45 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        Quote: GKS 2111
        Quote: finish
        self-dissolution will help the State Duma "to catch the wave of popular love again and hold elections against its background."

        What, excuse me? I heard rightly about people's love? Love ???

        And what is wrong? They forbade hatred of the authorities by law and summed up under Art. 151. Once you didn’t fall in love, you will receive a fine from 30 to 100 thousand. If you didn’t understand and didn’t like it a second time, then you’ll pay from 100 to 200 thousand, but if you didn’t like it after that, then taking into account relapse you will have to give up to 300 thousand and spend 15 days in a separate room studying the study guide - “How to love power, so that she would not love you.
      7. Vadim237 21 January 2020 21: 02 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Probably Tough folk love.
    2. Svarog 21 January 2020 14: 45 New
      • 16
      • 8
      +8
      The State Duma denied rumors about the dissolution of parliament

      In general, a parliament where one party runs is not needed!
      1. Yves762 21 January 2020 14: 58 New
        • 6
        • 5
        +1
        Quote: Svarog
        In general, a parliament where one party runs is not needed!

        what But what about the fact that this party represents ( crying Sorry, Lord. !!!.) Majority opinion?
        1. Svarog 21 January 2020 15: 00 New
          • 16
          • 9
          +7
          Quote: Yves762
          Quote: Svarog
          In general, a parliament where one party runs is not needed!

          what But what about the fact that this party represents the majority opinion ( crying Sorry, Lord. !!!.)?

          Which majority? This party presents only its opinion and the opinion of money bags, from the majority (that is, from the people) it is as far away as Neptune is from the sun ..
          1. BARKAS 21 January 2020 15: 09 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            The normal Supreme Council must be revived. The deputy must work constantly in his region.
            1. Yves762 21 January 2020 15: 35 New
              • 3
              • 2
              +1
              Quote: BARKAS
              The normal Supreme Council must be revived. The deputy must work constantly in his region.

              And they will "consult" on Skype.?. laughing
              Seriously, before the Supreme Council, for starters, it is necessary to stir up the local Soviets; but, as they work on the ground, so also by All ... ( repeat sorry) ... Russian Congress of Soviets! Well and so on ...
              And then all these federal assemblies are already more and more like feudal ... lol
          2. Yves762 21 January 2020 15: 19 New
            • 4
            • 3
            +1
            Quote: Svarog
            Which majority? This party represents only its opinion and the opinion of money bags, it is also far from the majority (that is, from the people) ...

            And what is the people (!!!) allowed ( crying Sorry, Lord. !!!.) Over yourself such.?. repeat
            ??
            (rhetorical sarcasm it was)
            It doesn’t matter, not about me. And about the principle of taking into account the views of the parties.
          3. Sotskiy 21 January 2020 16: 05 New
            • 4
            • 2
            +2
            Quote: Svarog
            Which majority?

            Those who have more money are now the “majority”, because can have their representatives in structures that write laws for others who do not have money for such representatives. fellow
          4. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 09 New
            • 3
            • 6
            -3
            Quote: Svarog
            This party presents only its opinion and the opinion of money bags, from the majority (that is, from the people) it is as far away as Neptune is from the sun ..

            A vivid example of reasoning not allowed to the feeder, a representative of the minority.
            And in your minority do representatives of what sections of the population want to break through? Without bags and foreign passports?
            1. Svarog 21 January 2020 16: 14 New
              • 9
              • 6
              +3
              Quote: Genry
              A vivid example of reasoning not allowed to the feeder, a representative of the minority.

              So you think that the majority supported pension reform? wassat Give at least a dozen laws that have been adopted by the EP and which have benefited the vast majority of the population of our country.
              1. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 29 New
                • 2
                • 6
                -4
                Quote: Svarog
                So you think that the majority supported pension reform?

                Any fool understands that pension reform is a consequence of the priority of international law over Russian. What the IMF orders is fulfilled.
                And it’s useless to shuffle the population of the parliament - the system of laws does not change. You need to change from the beginning, the beginning: the Constitution.
                1. Svarog 21 January 2020 16: 35 New
                  • 7
                  • 7
                  0
                  And it’s useless to shuffle the population of the parliament - the system of laws does not change.

                  Useless to change useless .. here I agree .. The Duma needs a living one that really reflects the will of the population in laws
                  You need to change from the beginning, the beginning: the Constitution.
                  Any fool understands that pension reform is a consequence of the priority of international law over Russian

                  About how .. that is, do you think that for the sake of the United States the country's leadership is harming the population? And who interfered with changing the Constitution .. for 20 years with such support it was possible ..?
                  1. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 42 New
                    • 3
                    • 6
                    -3
                    Quote: Svarog
                    About how .. that is, do you think that for the sake of the United States the country's leadership is harming the population?

                    The population supported the Yeltsin Constitution and did not want to change (more precisely, it didn’t care), just as you don’t want it now (the thought should ripen).
                    1. solzh 21 January 2020 17: 23 New
                      • 4
                      • 1
                      +3
                      Quote: Genry
                      The population supported the Yeltsin Constitution and did not want changes (more precisely, it did not care)

                      At the time of the "adoption" of the constitution, 106170835 voters were registered. 58187755 ballot papers were issued. 32937630 voted for the constitution. I hope I wasn’t mistaken with the numbers, I’m using a cell phone on the network.
                      http://www.cikrf.ru/banners/vib_arhiv/referendum/1993_ref_itogi.php
                      Sorry, but did the population have a choice? Do not forget that before this ebn made a coup d'etat and shot the Supreme Council from tanks.
                      1. Genry 21 January 2020 18: 16 New
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        -1
                        Quote: solzh
                        Sorry, but did the population have a choice?

                        Vote against - isn't that an option?
                        Quote: solzh
                        Do not forget that before this ebn made a coup d'etat and shot the Supreme Council from tanks.

                        And most liked it - the TV said to everyone that it was right.
                        Now, too, the issue of the Constitution will be blurred and distorted. Only Solovyov tried to say a few times about the Constitution - but the media are guided by foreign rating agencies, which sharply “cut” such words (indirect censorship).
                2. solzh 21 January 2020 16: 42 New
                  • 5
                  • 1
                  +4
                  Quote: Genry
                  And it’s useless to shuffle the population of the parliament - the system of laws does not change. You need to change from the beginning, the beginning: the Constitution.

                  If you do not shuffle parliament, then who will change the laws? Therefore, it is necessary to change it. The parliament will change, and the laws will change. Do not change, accordingly, nothing will change.
                  1. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 47 New
                    • 2
                    • 4
                    -2
                    Quote: solzh
                    The parliament will change, and the laws will change.

                    Parliament only approves, but does not write laws. They just don’t give him anything good. Laws are written by foreign consulting companies, as under Yeltsin the entire Constitution was written by USAID. The deputies discussed one thing, but signed a completely different one.
                    1. solzh 21 January 2020 16: 53 New
                      • 7
                      • 1
                      +6
                      Quote: Genry
                      Parliament only approves, but does not write laws. They just don’t give him anything good.

                      That’s why, or rather, that’s why the parliament must be changed. When they approve a law, do not they read it? They are reading! Before adopting the law, they also discuss it. And if they don’t read it, all the more so, why are they needed there?
                      1. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 56 New
                        • 2
                        • 2
                        0
                        Quote: solzh
                        When they approve a law, do not they read it? They are reading!

                        You are given two varieties of kaki - read and choose. And they are simply obliged to approve something, otherwise international law will be offended.
          5. solzh 21 January 2020 16: 33 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            Quote: Svarog
            from the majority (that is, from the people) it is as far as neptune from the sun

            I agree. Let me remind you of those who disagree. In 2016, 111,724 million voters were registered. The turnout was 47,88%. If I’m not mistaken, then something about 29 million people voted for EP, which is 25,96% of the total voters list. But due to the fact that the majority did not come to the polls, EP got a majority in the Duma. The reasons why people did not come to vote were different. And the main reason, in my opinion, was the lack of confidence in the elections. For some reason, people believe that nothing will change from their voices, but this is not so. You need to go to the polls, otherwise your vote in calculating the results may not go to those.
    3. Thrifty 21 January 2020 15: 41 New
      • 1
      • 4
      -3
      Sorry, very sorry! There is no sailor Zheleznik on them! !!
    4. AUL
      AUL 21 January 2020 15: 43 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: finish
      But it would be nice!

      But who voluntarily leaves such a trough?
      1. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 12 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        Quote: AUL
        But who voluntarily leaves such a trough?

        They protect him from you.
    5. ul_vitalii 21 January 2020 15: 51 New
      • 8
      • 2
      +6
      Quote: finish
      But it would be nice!

      Yeah, when you feel bad. wink laughing
  2. Bomb 21 January 2020 14: 18 New
    • 9
    • 4
    +5
    This must not be allowed! The country’s gender will go away with joy =)
  3. Siberian 66 21 January 2020 14: 20 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    Who will go from there himself .. Only forward feet or along the stage ..
    1. knn54 21 January 2020 15: 12 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Why the State Duma self-dissolution ???
  4. Lelek 21 January 2020 14: 22 New
    • 12
    • 2
    +10
    Self-dissolution, of course, will not, but some who have a second citizenship or real estate over the hill (if this clause is approved in the amendments to the Constitution) will have to leave, and there are many of them.
    1. balunn 21 January 2020 14: 24 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      some are 90% of this structure. Will give to finalize respected people. And during this time everything will be reissued for wives, children, lovers. Everything within the law will be.
      1. Lelek 21 January 2020 14: 31 New
        • 6
        • 3
        +3
        Quote: balunn
        And during this time everything will be reissued for wives, children, lovers.

        hi
        Well, on this option, Putin made a proposal to take into account the elections and appointments. In general, what to guess, let's see how “it” turns out. The wise ones will certainly look for loopholes, the place is painfully sweet. yes
        1. VIT101 21 January 2020 17: 49 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Lelek
          Well, on this option, Putin made a proposal


          He would also have made a proposal to reduce the term of office to 4 years to the president and deputies of the State Duma. The people would vote for this with both hands. And no one will come to the referendum.
  5. fif21 21 January 2020 14: 23 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    Sorry, very sorry! Well then, at 21 people will have to cast out demons from the Duma! hi
  6. The Siberian barber 21 January 2020 14: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    .... fiction on the top shelf (s) laughing
  7. book 21 January 2020 14: 28 New
    • 7
    • 5
    +2
    yes it would be better to disperse this rabble
    1. Mestny 21 January 2020 14: 45 New
      • 7
      • 16
      -9
      It would be better on the site to disperse your rabble. Post the same thing, put your own pluses.
      1. ultra 21 January 2020 14: 55 New
        • 9
        • 3
        +6
        In the Duma, not rabble of course. There are opportunists, bribe takers, people without honor and conscience, and in my opinion there are 60-70 percent of them.
      2. fif21 21 January 2020 16: 24 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Mestny
        It would be better if the site dispersed your rabble

        Who are you crumbing the loaf for !? People have the right to express their opinion, albeit different from the official.
        As for the "rabble" - everything in the world is relative! hi
  8. bk316 21 January 2020 14: 32 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    The law on amending the Constitution has been submitted to the State Duma.
    Deputies can now no longer have a residence permit. The Duma halves.
    By the way, someone would like the minimum wage to be no less than the cost of living - get a sign ...
    1. balunn 21 January 2020 14: 42 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Do you really believe that bees will be against honey (this is me about EdRo and changes to the Constitution)?
      1. bk316 21 January 2020 16: 11 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        You really believe that bees will be against honey

        You mean the prohibition of work as a deputy with a residence permit.
        I do not believe I'm sure.
        I can justify it, BUT
        Do you want to bet?

        1. balunn 21 January 2020 16: 35 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          That is, are you sure that our deputies, as well as their immediate family, will renounce foreign citizenship, accounts, residence permits, companies and organizations affiliated with them, and other things, and become crystal clear?
  9. Prisoner 21 January 2020 14: 32 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    They will dissolve themselves! You will push out with your hands and feet will cling. From such a feeder yes voluntarily. Now!
    1. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 18 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Captive
      They will dissolve themselves! You will push out with your hands and feet will cling. From such a feeder yes voluntarily. Now!

      This is similar if you quit your job / business.
      In general, why on earth should self-dissolution be? What is the reason?
  10. Roman070280 21 January 2020 14: 37 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    The first to hear rumors about the early dissolution of the State Duma at a plenary meeting was the leader of the LDPR Vladimir Zhirinovsky. He called on colleagues "not to listen and not to go on occasion" at these conjectures


    And it would be without him "colleagues" as they would start to listen .. but how would they go about it .. yes how to repent to the people would all rush ..
  11. And
    And 21 January 2020 14: 38 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    "... He called on his colleagues" not to listen and not to go on about "these speculations ...". Those. As soon as Western media wrote news about the dissolution of the State Duma, one of the deputies was already picking up things to go out.
  12. askort154 21 January 2020 14: 38 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    The State Duma denied rumors about the dissolution of parliament.

    How can you think so bad of us? crying
  13. Roman070280 21 January 2020 14: 39 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Medvedev, the resignation of the government is associated with new tasks for the political renewal of the country, which President Vladimir Putin outlined in a message to the Federal Assembly. "For to make all these decisions the president must be absolutely free to discuss and accept them without regard to any other factors. Including government factor", The former prime minister explained.


    Why Volodin does not want to give the president a similar freedom??
  14. Nonna 21 January 2020 14: 56 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    It is unfortunate that these are rumors. Little people slamming American senators and adopting anti-people’s laws shouldn’t be in this Duma at all.
    1. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 21 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Nonna
      Little people slamming American senators and adopting anti-people’s laws shouldn’t be in this Duma at all.

      This is corrected only by the Constitution ..... It is necessary to eliminate the priority of international law over state.
  15. DPN
    DPN 21 January 2020 15: 04 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    and who wants to say goodbye to their salary? and go for 15-20 tons of rubles ..
    1. Vadim237 21 January 2020 21: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      They have dozens and hundreds of millions of rubles worth of business and assets — what salaries of 15-20 thousand are you talking about?
      1. DPN
        DPN 21 January 2020 22: 40 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        They are altruists and sit just for the pleasure of the people and for their good.
  16. Kerensky 21 January 2020 15: 12 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    In no case!!! No dissolution and self-dissolution.
    The deputy what? That's right - WORK. Therefore, I propose to improve the quality of their work:
    1. Form of payment - piecework.
    2. The system of fines for absenteeism and other violations of labor discipline and labor protection.
    3. Optional, - shift method.
    4. Collective liability for possible damage from "lawmaking."
  17. Calm 21 January 2020 15: 29 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Parliament is a representative institution whose deputies are elected by the people and represent its interests in Parliament. The parliament exercises legislative power. What kind of people are chosen our interesting !!! ??? Do they defend our interests, the interests of the people?
  18. Dmitry Potapov 21 January 2020 15: 32 New
    • 5
    • 1
    +4
    What do you want a lot, Russians! Yes, we, we, we for the Russian people will not do a damn few more terms!
  19. habaroff.ven 21 January 2020 15: 41 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Self-destruction is what these parasites deserve. Put, as already suggested, another copy machine in the Kremlin to propagate laws and it will not be commensurably cheaper with the same result of anti-popular activities.
  20. Mihail55 21 January 2020 15: 44 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    What a pity that this will not happen smile
    1. Vadim237 21 January 2020 21: 07 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And what will their dissolution give you?
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. Genry 21 January 2020 16: 23 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    How much idle talk and noise, if only not to discuss the amendment of the Constitution ...
  23. Romey 21 January 2020 16: 24 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    (In the voice of Mark Cicero, survive the scripture of 42 years): Oh, bitterly to me citizens, listen to such rebellious words! Was it not this assembly of so respected people that supported all the undertakings of our wise princeps? Did he not approve the laws of the most worthy fathers of senators? Did they, the most faithful comrades-in-arms of the divine Julius, provide all-round support and support in his works, with which he, becoming like Romulus, re-founded the City? Are you really citizens, so ungrateful, just blaspheme the last words of the friends of Emperor Caesar ?!
  24. mag nit 21 January 2020 16: 38 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    These will only go forward with their feet ...
  25. faterdom 21 January 2020 17: 10 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    It is foolish to ask someone in the State Duma what they think about self-dissolution. If One-one-must decide, they will understand tomorrow that they have longed for this for a long time. But he will not decide - of course, why should they think such a heresy?
    Everything should be ordered:
    -Do it again! - Do not think about self-dissolution!
    -Do it two! -Thinking of self-dissolution!
    -Time!
    -Two!
    Trained monkeys, for some reason with ministerial salaries.
  26. Zeev Zeev 21 January 2020 17: 45 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If the authorities so stubbornly deny, then the chances of early elections are higher than ever.
  27. Fenix 2.0 21 January 2020 18: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I know the State Duru, this is where all the crap of society sits, but I didn’t know the State Duma, but I once sailed under Tsar Nikolashka.
  28. iouris 22 January 2020 13: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    He doesn't know yet.