The British introduced the new Challenger 2 tank for action in urban environments

The British introduced the new Challenger 2 tank for action in urban environments

Modified British main tank Challenger 2 Streetfighter II


In the UK, the first tests of a modified sample of a modified British main tank Challenger 2, designated as Streetfighter II. This was reported by the magazine "Jane's Defense Weekly".

According to the publication, the first tests of the new “city” tank took place at the beginning of December 2019 at the British center of combat training in urban conditions Copehill Down at a military training ground in Salisbury. On December 5, 2019, at the same training ground, the new Challenger 2 Streetfighter II tank was presented to senior representatives of the British Army and the British Ministry of Defense.

According to the publication, tests of a new model of the Challenger 2 Streetfighter II tank have been going on since 2018, although the further prospects of this modification are still not clear. It is noted that the tank was developed on its own by the Royal Tank Corps with the participation of the British Defense Ministry Research Center

A feature of this model of the modified Challenger 2 Streetfighter II tank is the installed system of "transparent" or "situational armor" IronVision Israeli company Elbit Systems. "Transparent armor" is a system of all-round visibility through a series of cameras on the tank body, transmitting a circular image in real time to the helmet-mounted indicators of crew members.


The IronVision system was first installed on the Challenger 2 Streetfighter II instead of the original Brimstone II long-range anti-tank missile launcher, originally placed on the roof of the tower.

Also, the Challenger 2 Streetfighter II tank is equipped with a new communication system, modified external compartments for property placement and a bulldozer dump. A 12,7 mm M2 machine gun in a remotely controlled combat module (in addition to the standard 7,62 mm machine gun on turrets) and a 60 mm mortar were installed on the tank turret. The camouflage color of the tank was borrowed from the “urban camouflage” of armored vehicles of the British Berlin motorized infantry brigade of the 1970s and 1980s.
Photos used:
UK Department of Defense
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. tihonmarine 21 January 2020 14: 03 New
    • 9
    • 11
    -2
    Люди, да когда же мы прекратим создавать средства убийства, не пора ли вместо танков изобретать новый трактор.
    1. fruit_cake 21 January 2020 14: 13 New
      • 9
      • 6
      +3
      so you go write to those in power, to all these democrats and other liberals whose military budgets are larger than the budgets of individual countries
      1. tihonmarine 21 January 2020 14: 14 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        Quote: fruit_cake
        so you go write to those in power, to all these democrats and other liberals whose military budgets are larger than the budgets of individual countries

        Here is the answer.
    2. old friend 21 January 2020 14: 16 New
      • 15
      • 2
      +13
      You are clearly on the wrong site)
      1. tihonmarine 21 January 2020 14: 50 New
        • 4
        • 6
        -2
        Quote: old friend
        You are clearly on the wrong site.

        Yeah, I know. I’m not against the fight.
    3. carstorm 11 21 January 2020 14: 51 New
      • 22
      • 0
      +22
      the thing is that creating a tractor instead of tanks you simply will be left without tractors, too, because whoever has the tanks will want your tractors too. and since you don’t have tanks, they don’t sweat too much) the world is arranged so that pacifism only brings war closer) the temptation is too great to get everything at once.
      1. eagle owl 21 January 2020 15: 00 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Well, here's how to say it. As for us, this is fair. As for Europe, I have a firm conviction. what is somewhat wrong there. "War must feed itself." And what's the point of capturing Germany for example? What will the winner get? Slaves? Of the earth? Brain? Brains from under a stick cannot work. And there are no resources there - there is nothing to rob.
        True, there is one option - the destruction of a competitor, just destroy - and capture its market share
        1. Zoldat_A 21 January 2020 15: 22 New
          • 11
          • 0
          +11
          Quote: Uhu
          True, there is one option - the destruction of a competitor, just destroy - and capture its market share

          The truth is yours.
          Простой пример - бывшие "братушки". Все, кто жил в Советском Союзе, помнят болгарские овощные и фруктовые консервы - начиная с горошка в салат на Новый год и заканчивая нектаром в стеклянных бутылках. Вы таки будете смеяться, но теперь в болгарских магазинах продаётся перец, который мы называем "болгарский", родом из Турции...
          1. pytar 21 January 2020 18: 56 New
            • 7
            • 0
            +7
            The truth is yours. A simple example is the former "bros". Everyone ... remembers the Bulgarian canned fruits and vegetables .... You will still laugh, but now pepper is sold in Bulgarian shops, which we call "Bulgarian", originally from Turkey ...

            I apologize for interfering in the dialogue, but the example given by you "has little to do with reality! I understand that this mantra is constantly replicated in Russian-speaking resources, but the truth is different ... Agriculture in Bulgaria is seasonal. In the summer, they are mainly grown and sold. Bulgarian vegetables and products. Up to 70% of the products sold in stores are produced in Bulgaria. In winter, exports from warm countries increase. There are also orangerium ones, but they are more expensive. Fact: Bulgaria exported agricultural products in 2019 for about 5 euros! Mainly cereal crops, as they are more profitable. hi
            1. eagle owl 21 January 2020 19: 40 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Well, God forbid. But your bed, unfortunately, has disappeared tightly with us - this is a fact. The good thing was
              1. pytar 21 January 2020 20: 29 New
                • 3
                • 0
                +3
                Lecho is made and sold with us. Unfortunately from Russia. markets are gone. In recent years, efforts are underway to return. hi
                https://rus.bg/esche/interesno/interesno/29034-mir-bolgarii-v-moskve-vse-chto-bolgarskaya-i-ne-tolko-dusha-pozhelaet
                1. eagle owl 21 January 2020 20: 37 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Listen, it’s just interesting - what’s so? Was there any sanction with you?
                  1. pytar 22 January 2020 00: 17 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Listen, it’s just interesting - what’s so? Was there any sanction with you?

                    The reasons are many. This is a long story to tell and this is not the place.
            2. mikstepanenko 21 January 2020 19: 48 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              I apologize for interfering in the dialogue, but the example you gave me has little in common with reality! I understand that this mantra is constantly replicated in Russian-speaking resources, but the truth is different ...
              It’s a pity that the Bulgarians themselves have no idea about this “other truth”.
              "About 90% of the vegetables and fruits consumed by the Bulgarians are imported, and domestic production is completely destroyed. This was announced by Chavdar Marinov, executive director of the Bulgarian Association of Organizations of Fruit and Vegetable Manufacturers. According to statistics for the last 10 months of 2018, the import of fresh vegetables increased by 11,7% per year, reaching 226,7 thousand tons, and fresh fruit - by 9,4% and amounted to 255,3 thousand tons. "
              1. pytar 21 January 2020 20: 56 New
                • 7
                • 0
                +7
                Dear Mikhail, I do not want to enter into disputes on issues not related to the topic. There is talk about tanks ... Отвечу всего раз: Ваш цитат, исходит из БАОПОФ. В нее членуют 5-7% от всех производители. БАОПОФ хочет добить больше гос-субсидии. В то же время согласно Института рыночной экономики около 70% товаров, продающихся в крупных торговых сетях Болгарии, произведено в стране. Я летом покупаю болгарских овощей и фрукты, их на рынках полно! Ныне действительно производятся намного менше о.ф., чем ранше. В то же время маленкая Болгария превратилась в один из мировых лидеров по экспорту зерновых и масличных культур. По некоторые позиции мы вышли на 1-место в мире. В виду климатических особенностей стране, овощи дороже и капризнее для выращивания, чем зерно. А "белое золото", как нефть! Эго можно транспортироват куда угодно! Производство ов. и фр. растет, но с уклон к эко- и биопродуктов. Менше количество, но с высокое качество. У нас не так много земли, 2/3 територии стране горы! За 7 лет площадь участков для биоземледелия увеличились в 6 раз. В один только 2018 год производство тепличных овощей увеличилось на 28%! В резюме: Экспортируем селхозпродукция за 5 млрд. евра, импортируем за 4 млрд.! Магазины полные, разнообразие огромное! Во время соца, у нас прилавки были пустые. Было сложно найти не то, что импортное, но даже родное. hi
      2. tihonmarine 21 January 2020 15: 04 New
        • 0
        • 2
        -2
        Quote: carstorm 11
        and since you don’t have tanks, they don’t sweat too much) the world is arranged so that pacifism only brings war closer) the temptation is too great to get everything at once.

        No, everything is easier "war is profit and over profit."[B] [/ b]
      3. Paul Siebert 21 January 2020 15: 58 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Yes, they there in Salisbury all the "Novice" sniffed.
        Hiley-Likely! "
        They already have a large tank - a small hatches ...
        An opaque hint of a Russian nesting doll! laughing
    4. NEXUS 21 January 2020 16: 07 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: tihonmarine
      Люди, да когда же мы прекратим создавать средства убийства, не пора ли вместо танков изобретать новый трактор.

      I once wrote that if all the efforts and money that is invested in war and military development were put into medicine, for example, then humanity has long forgotten about diseases such as cancer, diabetes, AIDS, and so on ...
      1. mikstepanenko 21 January 2020 19: 54 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        I once wrote that if all the efforts and money that is invested in war and military development were put into medicine, for example, then humanity has long forgotten about diseases such as cancer, diabetes, AIDS, and so on ...
        I can’t say anything about diabetes, I don’t know. Cancer, according to the situation as of the middle of the last century, has been studied enough so that this problem can be solved completely, to make the concept itself obsolete. And the means for this are needed, compared with those spent now, very modest. And AIDS was a scam from the very beginning.
        1. NEXUS 21 January 2020 20: 20 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: mikstepanenko
          I can’t say anything about diabetes, I don’t know.

          50 years ago, diabetes was not a very common disease, and now it has crossed the line of the epidemic.
          Quote: mikstepanenko
          Cancer, according to the situation as of the middle of the last century, has been studied enough so that this problem can be solved completely, to make the concept itself obsolete.

          There are a lot of oncology types, therefore the problem is not so easy.
          Quote: mikstepanenko
          And AIDS was a scam from the very beginning.

          However, this virus is deadly, if not cool.
          1. mikstepanenko 21 January 2020 20: 26 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            This is not the topic of the site, but because if you want to continue then in personal correspondence. What I wrote can confirm with evidence. For a week of reading, to email.
    5. orionvitt 21 January 2020 16: 58 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: tihonmarine
      People, when will we stop creating killing means?

      Maybe it's time, but only as long as humanity is alive, this will not happen. There are a lot of scum that have always been and always will be. Not on one side, but on the other. No matter how inside, so outside. I recalled an old joke:
      There is a passerby looking, a little girl in the sandbox of a kitten is tormenting. A passerby asks:
      - Girl, don’t you like animals?
      The girl looked at him with a "kind" look and said:
      - Yes, I don’t really like that either.
    6. Tank jacket 21 January 2020 17: 25 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      hi Do not worry, this tank was created to participate in the civil war against Scotland and Ireland.
    7. Alexfly 21 January 2020 17: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You’ll get a little tractor out of the tank; it’s already been checked by grandfathers after the Second World War.
    8. Prisoner 21 January 2020 17: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      winked Which tractor? For "urban action"?
  2. Konstantin Shevchenko 21 January 2020 14: 04 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    "Cool," the fighter in front covers the retreating tank. There would be more such fighters and exercises in NATO.
    1. Mihail2019 21 January 2020 18: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Yeah, and the type of "wounded" lying in a bulldozer dump in front of the tank, but when retreating, it also surprised a lot!
      Right the most “safe” place, you won’t find it better !!!
  3. Thrifty 21 January 2020 14: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The new tank would be Challenger 3, and then a NEW MODIFICATION! The author probably knows the difference, I think so. ..
  4. Buffet 21 January 2020 14: 12 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    What kind of city tank is it if the commander needs to lean out of the tower to shoot from a machine gun? The sniper will say thanks ...
    1. Alex_You 21 January 2020 16: 22 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      The city tank as such does not exist in principle.
      1. Romario_Argo 23 January 2020 11: 37 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I agree, everything in the tactics of using tanks with interfacing them with the work of the BMP
        in Syria, our T-72 in the "body kit" perfectly ironed city blocks for 5 years
  5. signifera 21 January 2020 14: 13 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Put the wounded in front of the tank on the dump, and hide behind the stern and go back. These are the warriors. What percentage that they will bring him alive)))
    1. Mihail2019 21 January 2020 18: 24 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Exactly! My jaw dropped already at this frame! Well, hang a mesh “basket” aft in such a case - the exhaust is still left behind, and not into the stern, like the Abrasha or our T-80!
  6. Amateur 21 January 2020 14: 20 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    The total mass of the tank of the latest modifications adopted after its first combat use (after 2003) reaches 74,95 tons, taking into account the anti-cumulative gratings, bulwarks and non-reactive DZ plates (NERA type) placed in addition to them

    I wonder where he can ride with such weight?
    1. Mihail2019 21 January 2020 18: 26 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Probably the best thing on the hardware, on four-axle platforms .. laughing
  7. Klingon 21 January 2020 14: 21 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    Quote: SHVEDsky_stol
    What kind of city tank is it if the commander needs to lean out of the tower to shoot from a machine gun? The sniper will say thanks ...

    in terms of need to stick out for shooting? it is written, a machine gun on a remote turret. Can you beguiled with T-72B3 ??
  8. knn54 21 January 2020 14: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    В наше время решающие сражения будут происходить в крупных городах.
    Как пример-уникальные штурмовые группы,которые включали в свой состав и Т-34 при взятии Кенигсберга.
    And the sad "experience" during the storming of Grozny, in the first Chechen one.
    1. Zoldat_A 21 January 2020 15: 32 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: knn54
      And the sad "experience" during the storming of Grozny, in the first Chechen one.

      If the army will not have such a shame as Pasha Mercedes, then such a “sad experience” will no longer be. He promised to take Grozny with one RAP, and introduced tanks. I’m not sure about one RAP, but to fill the city with "targets" ... Great, damn it, military commander, so that he could bake him well ...
  9. Sanichsan 21 January 2020 14: 48 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    this is not an urban tank, this is a village tank! laughing The British Army’s planning horizon is limited to entering the village. request
  10. prodi 21 January 2020 14: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, the trunk of a car for urban battles should rise to at least 70 degrees
  11. Kerensky 21 January 2020 14: 56 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Mdya ... Hacky approach. For the city you need to start a car from scratch. That's why he needs a long trunk, for example? Yes, and all the cameras plant dust and soot - he will be a "transparent armor" ....
  12. voyaka uh 21 January 2020 14: 57 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    The most important thing is not said: did they replace the rifled gun with a shotgun loading with a standard NATO smoothbore?
    1. Alex_You 21 January 2020 16: 16 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The gun shows that this is a good old L30.
      1. voyaka uh 21 January 2020 16: 45 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        They tested the Rheinmetall 120 on the Challenger. Looks like there is no money to replace.
        As a city tank Challenger 2 does not pull. Without KAZ, there’s nothing to talk about. It’s not enough to see 360 ​​degrees from the inside. We must also be able to catch ATGMs in 360.
        1. Alex_You 21 January 2020 16: 57 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Without KAZ, there’s nothing to talk about. It’s not enough to see 360 ​​degrees from the inside. We must also be able to catch ATGMs in 360.
          I agree one hundred percent. Even there is no banal TUSKa, not to mention the trophy, can we let them drive?
  13. shinobi 21 January 2020 14: 59 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    A tank in a city battle against a staffed infantry squad, a big target. It will get from above into an engine compartment from an RPG or a tank and remember what it was called. In police actions, where apart from the rifleman the enemy has nothing, this fool of more than 70 tons is useless. In urban combat, heavy bmp and bmpt are needed.
    1. starik80 23 January 2020 07: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Поэтому в городе используют арт системы 120 мм и выше, а не бмп которые не могут сложить кирпичный дом и мало мальски крепкую постройку. Пару "средненьких" снайперов твою "штатно укомплектованного отделения пехоты" положат носом в асфальт и не дадут развить наступление. НЕ веришь? Не будем обращаться к опыту ВОВ, посмотри youtube "Бои за Дейр-эз-Зор" часовой фильм оператор шел в метрах 300 от штурмовых групп. Без танка на прямой наводке там вообще делать нечего. Танк как анти снайперское оружие не имеет себе равных, как подавление огневых точек, разрушение фортификаций противника и т.д. Без него никуда.
      1. shinobi 23 January 2020 14: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        A tank against a sniper is from complete despair. A counter-sniper group with the appropriate weapons must work against the sniper and enter the infantry squad. In a city battle, where in full civilians, you will be putting art into the house? The enemy’s city, okay, back and forth. Based on your logic, the carpet bombing of residential buildings as the Yankees did in the Second World War, it’s the very thing. Something is trifling. A bomb is half a ton, or a tulip is on a high-rise building, for sure. Something there tank 125mm or 152 at the sau. it’s necessary along the residential block, like Georgians.
        1. starik80 23 January 2020 22: 43 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          youtube "Fights for Deir ez-Zor" tank direct fire. An anti-sniper group is a “police operation” and a luxury during the war, an assault group and a couple of tanks are in, an enemy sniper usually makes the first shot and is unmasked, then the tank works. The difference between a police officer and an officer who graduated from a combined arms school is precisely in this, a policeman for minimizing civilian casualties, and a combined-arms officer for minimizing casualties in a unit. Since the conversation is about a tank, the police do not have tanks, so we are talking about combined arms combat. Withdraw a tank with direct fire and five high-explosive high-explosive shots along the floor to the area where the sniper or firing point (the building may just add up) ... the entire task was completed, there were no losses. BMP does not have such firepower and therefore it is only a means of amplification.
          1. shinobi 23 January 2020 23: 57 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Do you want to fight like this? On a large scale? I hasten to upset you, or can make you glad, such a war is no longer possible with Russia. Glory to Stalin and Beria, with all my nuuu, there is a very ambiguous attitude towards them. Whatever they wove in the West, they will fight with us they can only verbally and financially. The time of global conflicts has passed, and thank God. The war in Syria is a separate conversation and far from an indicator. As a matter of fact, they are fighting, full of stories from our military who was there. To suppress a sniper, it’s quite wise to use the same BMP-3. If without cereals th caliber does.
  14. sledak 21 January 2020 15: 00 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Now at least it’s clear why the Britons need a dozer blade - to evacuate the wounded.
    1. Mihail2019 21 January 2020 18: 32 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      The economy option, you can’t say anything - give a full-fledged MBT to the assault group to evacuate one or two wounded in the attached bulldozer dump. Although, with this approach - rather, already, two bodies .. For to think of such a thing - you have to be real "bites" !!
  15. Catfish 21 January 2020 15: 02 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Tank in town? And they heard about RPG-7 from the vents of the basement?
    And what the hell is that with a thick barrel sticking out at the left along the hatch on the tower?
    1. Krasnodar 21 January 2020 16: 52 New
      • 5
      • 4
      +1
      Watching where to fuck this RPG - 7
      If really from the basement - I don’t envy RPGist laughing
      In Bethlehem, at the beginning of zero fire, RPG-7s were shot at the undercarriage of M-60 reservists. As he rode, he continued
      1. Catfish 21 January 2020 20: 52 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        The arrows were horseradish, or RPG Chinese. laughing
        1. Krasnodar 21 January 2020 20: 58 New
          • 5
          • 2
          +3
          Arrows - possibly RPG - Soviet))
  16. JonnyT 21 January 2020 15: 13 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    They gather in comfort, while drinking English tea, to shoot Aboriginal people as in a video game.
  17. Incvizitor 21 January 2020 15: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    All the same, it seems to me that the terminator is best for the city, there the armor is good and it’s covered everywhere and 30Ks from the buildings are knocked out and 9M120F rockets, KAZ would be added there ...
    1. Krasnodar 21 January 2020 15: 35 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      For the city, it is best not to introduce armored vehicles there
      1. Incvizitor 21 January 2020 15: 39 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Without the support of the city’s armored vehicles, take this ...
        1. Krasnodar 21 January 2020 15: 48 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Why without support? In the outskirts, after stripping quarters, etc.
          1. Incvizitor 21 January 2020 17: 24 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            From the tactics of urban battles were:

            To avoid undesirable losses, tanks should advance at the same pace as advancing infantry units, without losing visual communication with them.

            As a rule, when attacking ground targets, an assault group has to move through open and well-shot areas; in order to minimize losses at this stage, fire support units (or attached fire weapons) should provide tight suppression fire. Another cover option is a smoke screen. (I think it’s better when both)

            The best way to get into the building, taken by a backer, to use the breaks in the wall, done in the course of the fire preparation of the stamp. For these purposes, it is necessary to provide tanks and equipment, driving a direct fire, installing ATGM, etc.

            Acting in collaboration with assault groups, armored vehicles should be on both sides of the street, as close to buildings as possible, supporting the assault groups with fire.

            BMPT does not have such a limited range of pointing angles in the vertical plane as MBT,
            Infantry fighting vehicles, in this case, have advantages. Their 30mm automatic guns can go up to 60 degrees.
            the truth is very vulnerable, BMPT has much better protection, the only open speaker module I consider vulnerable, but if you act more carefully then the modules will be more intact.
            1. Krasnodar 21 January 2020 17: 53 New
              • 4
              • 2
              +2
              The issue of saturation with the PT-flank of the enemy.
  18. bars1 21 January 2020 16: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ИМХО, закупать Т-14, да и другую БТТ с ДУБМ без аналога Iron Vision - пускать деньги на ветер. Либо обитаемая башня, либо ДУБМ с аналогом Iron Vision. Остальное полумеры.
  19. AB
    AB 21 January 2020 16: 27 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    I wonder if he can withstand the hit of the shot of the IG-7VR "Summary" from the RPG-7, in the barrel or from above. I think no. They will burn them all in the city. RPG-7 is now not only lazy.
  20. Alex_You 21 January 2020 16: 32 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Nda, a city tank. If only the Americans asked for a TUSK kit for familiarization, not to mention the Israeli "trophy". 42 mm with anti-cumulative screen on board. If only really ARATom veiled. Although there is one:
  21. Victor March 47 21 January 2020 18: 15 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Quote: tihonmarine
    Люди, да когда же мы прекратим создавать средства убийства, не пора ли вместо танков изобретать новый трактор.

    Чтобы выполнить вашу мечту, нужно просто переселить вас на необитаемый остров. Не снабдив НИКАКИМИ орудиями убийства живого.
    1. Mihail2019 21 January 2020 19: 15 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The first stone found - and the arms race will begin!
      A man in terms of murder weapons of his own kind is an extremely inventive bastard !!
      1. Old Michael 21 January 2020 21: 47 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        A man in terms of murder weapons of his own kind is an extremely inventive bastard !!

        Perhaps the hippies were somewhat right (“Make love, not war!”)
  22. Reserve buildbat 22 January 2020 20: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Wonderful movie! First, the “fighter” of kilograms of 150 cellulite barely falls through the window, then the “wounded” is poked with a barrel in the nose, then the “wounded” is taken out to a bulldozer dump. Not to mention the fact that such a "streetfighter" that barely moves is a grenade launcher's dream.
  23. jekasimf 23 January 2020 09: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Вот мне,как НЕ специалисту,интересно.Что будет с камерами кругового обзора,после попадания в танк нескольких бутылок с зажигательной смесью,пыли от разрушаемых зданий и пулеметного шквала.Которые будут иметь место в уличных боях.Я уж не говорю о применении РПГ.Для которого городские условия идеальны.