Attempted to attack the air base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria using drones


Syrian and Lebanese media report another militant attempt to attack the Russian Hmeimim air base in Latakia province.

The materials say that the militants used unmanned aerial vehicles armed with explosive devices.

It was planned to damage the military base of the Russian Aerospace Forces by the "dive method".

According to the latest information, the attack was repelled by air defense systems located at Khmeimim.

It is noted that the militants used three small-sized drones. The attack was carried out from the north-western direction in the dark. Most often, drones fly into the air from the territory of the province of Idlib, a significant part of the territory of which continues to remain under the occupation of terrorists.

The Russian military department reports that the Russian Air Force base in Syria is currently operating normally, there are no casualties or destruction.
Militant drones were neutralized.

At the moment, what kind of air defense systems were used by the Russian military to repel the attack are not reported. It can be assumed that we are talking about the use of shells.

In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

113 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. bessmertniy 20 January 2020 07: 24 New
    • 11
    • 11
    0
    It seems that the defense of Khmeimim became really reliable once all three drones were neutralized.
    1. aszzz888 20 January 2020 07: 33 New
      • 16
      • 3
      +13
      bessmertniy (Victor) Today, 07: 24 NEW
      0
      It seems that the defense of Khmeimim has become really reliable once all three drones were able to neutralize.

      I believe in the "reliability of defense" and before there was no reason to doubt.
      1. WILL 20 January 2020 07: 52 New
        • 26
        • 5
        +21
        It is necessary to maximally replicate such news in the media! The best advertising of Russian Weapons and not Come Up !!! good
        1. novobranets 20 January 2020 10: 56 New
          • 7
          • 2
          +5
          Quote: ANIMAL
          The best advertising of Russian Weapons and not Come Up !!!

          Yes, a small group goal is an indicator. Amer’s “patriots” couldn’t even detect this, much less destroy it.
          1. Shurik70 20 January 2020 13: 38 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Good real check.
            But with advertising it turns out only where they are fighting or have recently fought. Turkey, India, Serbia, Saudi Arabia ...
            We must be able to fight at the front in the media. Previously, they could not do it at all (from which the USSR fell apart). But every year we are able to do better. And the United States is losing the skill, "resting on its laurels."
    2. xGibSoNx 20 January 2020 19: 00 New
      • 2
      • 5
      -3
      It seems that
      It is more likely that there has simply been less news on Syria and more skillfully began to mask what is “not desirable to know”
      1. Dart2027 20 January 2020 20: 01 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: xGibSoNx
        and more skillfully began to mask what “is not desirable to know”

        What exactly?
  2. rocket757 20 January 2020 07: 30 New
    • 9
    • 1
    +8
    They are experiencing various devices of attack and further things will continue like that.
    You really can’t find the ends in that mess that is everywhere there.
    Passive defense has its limit ... this is all in the experimental stage, on the part of the curators of the barmalei. But it is still!
    1. Mountain shooter 20 January 2020 07: 59 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: rocket757
      Passive defense has its limit ... this is all in the experimental stage, on the part of the curators of the barmalei. But it is still

      Right. A method of air defense breakthrough is overloading targets in a narrow area. Yes, only if electronic warfare systems are successfully working on them, the "flock" will not reach anywhere ... Apparently, this is "tried" ... What is the point of attacking a well-protected object in small groups? Only as a "reconnaissance in battle", IMHO ...
      1. rocket757 20 January 2020 08: 07 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Concrete test. It’s not yet comprehensive, but it will come to that, the landfill is too convenient .... it’s easy to say there, I’m not me and not my pen! They bought, they say, on aliexpress or somewhere else. Go prove it later.
        However, for our systems a specific test, namely foreign technology against ours.
        We will parallel "move forward" !!!
        1. Aleksandr21 20 January 2020 09: 05 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: rocket757
          ... They bought, they say, on aliexpress or somewhere else. Go prove it later.
          However, for our systems a specific test, namely foreign technology against ours.
          We will parallel "move forward" !!!


          Most likely the way it is, Chinese civilian UAVs could buy on aliexpress and remake them to fit their needs. And in general, UAV fighters are mostly of artisan type, and of local production ... it is clear that we are not talking about Western vehicles (the serious UAVs that are used by the United States). In any case, it’s good that our air defense works, this is a huge plus.
          1. rocket757 20 January 2020 09: 21 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            Most likely the way it is, Chinese civilian UAVs could buy on aliexpress and remake them to fit their needs.

            You can buy a piece of iron anywhere, but here’s what it’s in the brain, even simple devices have them, an interesting control algorithm, this is already a serious experiment. The management program is already the work of serious experts ... which can easily be disguised as "craftsmen". After all, there are also enough of them.
            In general, let's see, see.
          2. Rzzz 20 January 2020 13: 52 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Aleksandr21
            Could buy on aliexpress Chinese civilian UAVs and remake them

            Most likely they didn’t buy the devices themselves, but their key components - motors, batteries, servos, regulators, autopilots with sensors, GPS receivers and radio control.
            The "firewood" itself is quite simply made from consumer-friendly materials from the construction market.
      2. Magog 20 January 2020 09: 10 New
        • 6
        • 6
        0
        EW can not be used in such clearly provocative attacks. It is obvious that the Americans, through militants, are trying to probe the possibilities and the principle of action of electronic warfare equipment. And this should remain a secret for the adversary as long as possible. After the comic story with “Donald Cook” in the Black Sea in 2014, the “partners” provoked forces in the Crimea about a dozen times to repeat the focus, sending the destroyers of the same type there ...
    2. pmkemcity 20 January 2020 11: 53 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      You really can’t find the ends in that mess that is everywhere there.

      Whose ears are sticking out and a hedgehog is understandable.
      1. rocket757 20 January 2020 11: 58 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: pmkemcity
        Whose ears are sticking out and a hedgehog is understandable.

        There are not just all the ears, and donkey, and camel, and jackals ...
        1. pmkemcity 20 January 2020 11: 59 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Exactly! And right after them ...
          1. rocket757 20 January 2020 12: 07 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And that is, a "secret, secret, secret" for such a small company, accomplices.
            1. pmkemcity 20 January 2020 12: 20 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              It's no secret that friends do not grow in the garden.
              1. rocket757 20 January 2020 12: 29 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Well, yes, they are grown on a field of miracles, in some kind of distant country.
                1. pmkemcity 20 January 2020 12: 30 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Unfortunately, a grown friend "turned out suddenly" ...
                  1. rocket757 20 January 2020 12: 33 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Quote: pmkemcity
                    Unfortunately, a grown friend "turned out suddenly" ...

                    Probably undershot? when landing.
                    1. pmkemcity 20 January 2020 12: 34 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Watered with fertilizers diluted with urine.
        2. Boa kaa 20 January 2020 19: 37 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          There are not just all the ears, and donkey, and camel, and jackals ...

          Quote: pmkemcity
          Exactly! And right after them ...

          Really elephants !?
          (Americans often write, for granted, the "elephant party", meaning Republicans , and this is Donya from Tramplin)
  3. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 07: 30 New
    • 9
    • 9
    0
    In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.

    And you can’t argue with that ...
    But, there is, as it were, one more point that observers are silent about, consciously, or simply do not pay attention to it ... We and the United States have bases in Syria, while neither the Russian Federation nor the United States fully control the territory of Syria. .. To us, from all the media, along the way, they pour information about the fact that the Russian Federation is the key player in Syria ... And if you compare the number of attacks on the Russian and US bases, the question arises why our base is always trying to kick shamelessly and often without reason and apparently very afraid of retaliation, and US bases are kicking less often and more for specific actions? And somehow, the answer to this question leads to a slight dissonance from the fact that we are given to ordinary people in the Russian Federation for the truth in Syria and what is happening there.
    1. Professor 20 January 2020 07: 44 New
      • 11
      • 16
      -5
      Quote: Alex2048
      And if you compare the number of attacks on the bases of the Russian Federation and the USA ...

      How can you compare without information?
      1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 08: 12 New
        • 10
        • 2
        +8
        I compared only the information available to me from the media. If you have access for comparison to other sources and you can share the data, I will be glad to have a constructive dialogue.
        1. Professor 20 January 2020 09: 05 New
          • 5
          • 16
          -11
          You compare what is not with what was not. They write about attacks on Russian bases once in a while (so that there are no leaks from the fighters with their mobile phones), they don’t write about attacks on American bases at all.
          1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 09: 24 New
            • 4
            • 4
            0
            From the fact that "leaked" in the media, too, we can draw conclusions.
            A "leaked" is not a little ... I think enough to do some analysis. I think that with a successful attack on the base, the attackers will scream loudly about it so that they hear the media, and the latter will be smashed and will certainly either embellish or “smooth sharp corners”.
            So, acting within the framework of the concept that forwards of a successful attack are loudly blowing, or as in this case, the defenders are loudly blowing that the efforts of the attackers have been nullified and analysis can be conducted.
            From the analysis, it turns out that despite the ostentatious “crappiness” of US air defense, no one really wants to kick the US base (except for the latest Iranian (IRGC) attacks), while the media is quite specific about the fact that the USA is actually robbing Syria allowing you to be in the territory of the latter not only by troops, but also shamelessly pumping out hydrocarbons, which are subsequently sold on the world market.
            At the same time, initially bringing peace to the territory of Syria, the Russian Federation, actively helping the legitimate government of Syria, including Assad, who does not have direct proceeds from the "humanitarian" action, quite so receives attacks on its bases.
            What is it? Deficiency in intelligence from the Russian Federation and the lack of data on possible threats to the base? Deficiencies in the response from the Russian Federation in relation to persons who allow themselves to strike at our bases? Or something else?
            1. Professor 20 January 2020 09: 36 New
              • 5
              • 18
              -13
              Quote: Alex2048
              From the fact that "leaked" in the media, too, we can draw conclusions.

              Not allowed.

              Quote: Alex2048
              A "leaked" is not a little ... I think enough to do some analysis. I think that with a successful attack on the base, the attackers will scream loudly about it so that they hear the media, and the latter will be smashed and will certainly either embellish or “smooth sharp corners”.

              You cannot know much or not much has leaked. from the word "completely." You do not monitor the media, blogs, militia digests and do not know whether they “shout” or not.

              Quote: Alex2048
              So, acting within the framework of the concept that forwards of a successful attack are loudly blowing, or as in this case, the defenders are loudly blowing that the efforts of the attackers have been nullified and analysis can be conducted.
              From the analysis, it turns out that despite the ostentatious “crappiness” of US air defense, no one really wants to kick the US base (except for the latest Iranian (IRGC) attacks), while the media is quite specific about the fact that the USA is actually robbing Syria allowing you to be in the territory of the latter not only by troops, but also shamelessly pumping out hydrocarbons, which are subsequently sold on the world market.

              There is no ANALYSIS due to the complete lack of input data. Nothing to analyze.

              Quote: Alex2048
              At the same time, initially bringing peace to the territory of Syria, the Russian Federation, actively helping the legitimate government of Syria, including Assad, who does not have direct proceeds from the "humanitarian" action, quite so receives attacks on its bases.

              Tell us about “bringing peace” to the victims of 100 thousand bombing raids. Oh yes. More than 100 airstrikes and not a single victim. The main thing here is not to fall into the hands of those to whom you bring the world. Ungrateful creatures will tear into souvenirs.

              Quote: Alex2048
              What is it? Deficiency in intelligence from the Russian Federation and the lack of data on possible threats to the base? Deficiencies in the response from the Russian Federation in relation to persons who allow themselves to strike at our bases? Or something else?

              Lack of information.
              1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 09: 42 New
                • 3
                • 4
                -1
                Not allowed.

                Why is it so peremptory?
                If you have any other data, share ... I would be very curious.
                Tell us about “bringing peace” to the victims of 100 thousand bombing raids. Oh yes. More than 100 airstrikes and not a single victim. The main thing here is not to fall into the hands of those to whom you bring the world. Ungrateful creatures will tear into souvenirs.

                Here I am about the same ...
                Hence the conclusion to the next question is not very hospitable. What are the true goals of finding the Russian Federation in Syria? And after answering it, you can already talk about the success of the Syrian company for the Russian Federation or about failure. And here it will already be possible to talk about a more complete analysis.
                1. Professor 20 January 2020 09: 51 New
                  • 4
                  • 15
                  -11
                  Quote: Alex2048
                  Why is it so peremptory?
                  If you have any other data, share ... I would be very curious.

                  Since neither you nor I have complete information for any analysis. This time.
                  Militias report success daily on infidels. Their statements should not be taken into account because of their deceit. These are two.
                  The losses of the military personnel of the Russian Federation are classified by law and their cell phones were seized at their base in Syria. These are three.

                  Quote: Alex2048
                  Hence the conclusion to the next question is not very hospitable. What are the true goals of finding the Russian Federation in Syria? And after answering it, you can already talk about the success of the Syrian company for the Russian Federation or about failure. And here it will already be possible to talk about a more complete analysis.

                  And really, what are the goals of the arrival of the Russian Federation in Syria?
                  1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 10: 12 New
                    • 4
                    • 8
                    -4
                    But on this subject you can speculate ...
                    And really, what are the goals of the arrival of the Russian Federation in Syria?

                    When military assistance to the Syrian government officially began in September 2015, in principle, everything was right in my opinion ... Under the guise of fighting ISIS, an operation was underway to prevent the construction of pipelines capable of connecting Arab hydrocarbons and Europe. But what began then when the media hatred was pouring and the opposition of the “Russian world” with European values, it clearly became clear that, in general, the sabotage operation was outgrowing its scale and getting out of control. Goals began to appear to justify two permanent bases. What for? Unclear. The goals of the need to develop Russian business in Syria began to appear. At the same time, no one asked Russian business whether he wants to go to Syria or is it more habitual for him to "suck" his beloved state. Some at some point in time, in my opinion, completely lost their minds and suggested looking for ISIS cells in the Philippines, Brunei and Indonesia. Etc...
                    All these arguments involuntarily suggest the idea that it was time to turn off the bench in Syria for a long time. But urapatriots have not yet realized all their ambitions and not all state money has been diverted to goals that are far from the commercial interests of the Russian Federation.
                    All the same, the question again arises: what are the goals of the Russian Federation’s stay in Syria today? Domestic political? Is it worth it?
                    1. Professor 20 January 2020 10: 21 New
                      • 5
                      • 9
                      -4
                      Quote: Alex2048
                      Under the cover of fighting ISIS, an operation to prevent the construction of pipelines capable of connecting Arab hydrocarbons and Europe was underway

                      No such goals were announced.

                      Quote: Alex2048
                      All the same, the question again arises: what are the goals of the Russian Federation’s stay in Syria today? Domestic political? Is it worth it?

                      What are the official goals?
                      1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 10: 25 New
                        • 2
                        • 5
                        -3
                        No such goals were announced.

                        And I'm not saying that only stated goals are suitable for analysis.
                        What are the official goals?

                        Unfortunately, they have recently ceased to be voiced.
                      2. Professor 20 January 2020 10: 42 New
                        • 5
                        • 9
                        -4
                        Quote: Alex2048
                        No such goals were announced.

                        And I'm not saying that only stated goals are suitable for analysis.
                        What are the official goals?

                        Unfortunately, they have recently ceased to be voiced.

                        Considering the gas pipeline as a goal is not serious. Geography allows you to build it bypassing Syria. Which by the way is already happening.

                        Quote: _Ugene_
                        one main goal has always been officially voiced - the fight against international terrorism

                        So the goals are not achieved. International terrorism is alive and well.
                      3. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 10: 51 New
                        • 3
                        • 4
                        -1
                        Considering the gas pipeline as a goal is not serious. Geography allows you to build it bypassing Syria. Which by the way is already happening.

                        It was simply cheaper via Syria. Well, and what kind of building?
                      4. Professor 20 January 2020 11: 07 New
                        • 3
                        • 5
                        -2
                        Quote: Alex2048
                        Considering the gas pipeline as a goal is not serious. Geography allows you to build it bypassing Syria. Which by the way is already happening.

                        It was simply cheaper via Syria. Well, and what kind of building?

                        Cheaper? Why on earth?
                        Build from Israel through Greece to Europe.
                      5. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 11: 21 New
                        • 3
                        • 4
                        -1
                        Build from Israel through Greece to Europe.

                        laughing laughing laughing
                        Sorry, Israel is certainly an important state, but the light did not converge on it. For Europe, the supply of hydrocarbons through the pipe from the UAE is more important. These supplies may affect the energy independence of Europe from Russia, and Israel is small. Under the control of Iraq and Libya with Israel, there is not enough territory of Syria to lay a pipe.
                      6. Professor 20 January 2020 12: 49 New
                        • 3
                        • 2
                        +1
                        Quote: Alex2048
                        Build from Israel through Greece to Europe.

                        laughing laughing laughing
                        Sorry, Israel is certainly an important state, but the light did not converge on it. For Europe, the supply of hydrocarbons through the pipe from the UAE is more important. These supplies may affect the energy independence of Europe from Russia, and Israel is small. Under the control of Iraq and Libya with Israel, there is not enough territory of Syria to lay a pipe.

                        There would be a pipe from Israel, and to Israel with the UAE it should be stretched out like 2 fingers ...
                      7. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 12: 52 New
                        • 2
                        • 1
                        +1
                        There would be a pipe from Israel

                        Obviously, with Syria, no one would need a pipe from Israel. The price tag just rolls over.
                      8. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 13: 09 New
                        • 0
                        • 2
                        -2
                        and to Israel with the UAE, to stretch it altogether like 2 fingers ...

                        Oh, no matter how problems start in Jordan.
                      9. Professor 20 January 2020 13: 44 New
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        -1
                        Quote: Alex2048
                        There would be a pipe from Israel

                        Obviously, with Syria, no one would need a pipe from Israel. The price tag just rolls over.

                        We need this pipe, independent of Syria.

                        Quote: Alex2048
                        and to Israel with the UAE, to stretch it altogether like 2 fingers ...

                        Oh, no matter how problems start in Jordan.

                        Jordan does not stand in the way of the chimney.
            2. _Ugene_ 21 January 2020 10: 06 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              So the goals are not achieved. International terrorism is alive and well.
              so the goal was stated - the fight against terrorism and not an unconditional victory over international terrorism laughing there are clearly some successes
            3. Professor 21 January 2020 10: 49 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: _Ugene_
              So the goals are not achieved. International terrorism is alive and well.
              so the goal was stated - the fight against terrorism and not an unconditional victory over international terrorism laughing there are clearly some successes

              The goal of participation, not victory? Well, just like an olympiad.
            4. _Ugene_ 21 January 2020 18: 17 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              The goal of participation, not victory? Well, just like an olympiad.

              the goal of victory in a particular place and not in the whole world, it has not been achieved yet, but it’s stupid to deny success, and to set a goal to defeat international terrorism around the world no one can do now
            5. Professor 21 January 2020 18: 20 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: _Ugene_
              The goal of participation, not victory? Well, just like an olympiad.

              the goal is victory in a particular place and not around the world, it has not yet been achieved but success it’s stupid to deny, and the goal is to defeat international terrorism around the world no one can do now

              As in the joke about Napoleon and oil: "already smeared, but still stinks." laughing
            6. _Ugene_ 21 January 2020 18: 42 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Well, you can formulate it that way, it already depends on the degree of bias of a particular individual
  4. _Ugene_ 20 January 2020 10: 38 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    one main goal has always been officially voiced - the fight against international terrorism
  5. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 10: 51 New
    • 5
    • 3
    +2
    one main goal has always been officially voiced - the fight against international terrorism

    Then the question ... Why were they limited only to Syria?
  6. _Ugene_ 21 January 2020 10: 01 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Then the question ... Why were they limited only to Syria?

    we are not the USA, the whole world does not sponsor us, the budget is limited
  • Okolotochny 20 January 2020 12: 47 New
    • 5
    • 2
    +3
    Colleague, stop feeding about the American troll, not horse feed)))
  • svp67 20 January 2020 07: 45 New
    • 12
    • 2
    +10
    Quote: Alex2048
    they always try to kick our base shamelessly and often without reason and apparently not really fearing retaliation, and do US bases kick less and more often in revenge for specific actions?

    You have a "mess" in your head. That is, it turns out that our base, with the personnel bored from idleness there, is just the same as our pilots, the lazy enemy will not kick? Yes, our planes a day can make a huge number of sorties, I note combat. Even the Americans admit that they did not expect from our aircraft the possibility of such a load, and even in isolation from the main supply points.
    So that any such attempt to harm us there has all the reasons and reasons.
    And at the expense of the Americans, I’ll remind you of one saying that few “who bites the hand of a serving”, I’ll add from myself a pointing one ...
    1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 08: 21 New
      • 2
      • 9
      -7
      I don’t know about the cereal in my head ...
      And here to the very point ...
      And at the expense of the Americans, I’ll remind you of one saying that few “who bites the hand of a serving”, I’ll add from myself a pointing one ...

      There is a feeling that the Russian Federation in Syria with a mission to free the world from ISIS and free the Syrian people is apparently out of place now.
      1. svp67 20 January 2020 08: 23 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        Quote: Alex2048
        There is a feeling that the Russian Federation in Syria with a mission to free the world from ISIS and free the Syrian people is apparently out of place now.

        That is, you support the point of view of ISIS and the United States?
        1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 08: 44 New
          • 3
          • 9
          -6
          Quote: svp67
          That is, you support the point of view of ISIS and the United States?

          Not at all.
          What is the conclusion?
          I just think what specific goals the Russian Federation pursues in Syria and what are the results of our work?
          I just think that the funds invested are not small and when they will be “repulsed” by net income, and not by the talk that the Russian Federation is a key player, by the talk that our air defense is the best ... and so on ... I I mean when the acquisitions from our presence in Syria will cease to have an image character, but will be embodied in real money?
          Talk about the fact that we have two bases there, I'm sorry a little not about the money for the Russian Federation. More precisely, this is talk about a direct loss for the Russian Federation; these two bases should be maintained. The value of these bases can only be considered during the Cold War with the West. With a possible variant of a direct military clash between the Russian Federation and NATO, these are simply two lost bases and wasted resources.
          1. dzvero 20 January 2020 09: 23 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            and embodied in real money?

            In BV, it’s almost the turn to purchase Russian weapons. But UTB real money and considerable.
            With a possible variant of a direct military clash between the Russian Federation and NATO, these are simply two lost bases and wasted resources.

            Here the question can be posed differently - how much resources will be diverted from NATO by the destruction of these two bases.
            1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 09: 31 New
              • 2
              • 6
              -4
              In BV, it’s almost the turn to purchase Russian weapons. But UTB real money and considerable.

              These are image acquisitions. This is not a direct income. The direct income from this could be attributed to the fact that, in theory, the S-400 was still manufactured in pieces, it had one price tag, and with continuous production, the price tag became smaller. This can be considered as direct income.
              Here the question can be posed differently - how much resources will be diverted from NATO by the destruction of these two bases.

              I'm afraid that in a real war there are not many. You do not think that they will be destroyed by a massive non-nuclear missile strike. All the same, there is nothing more reliable than a nuclear strike on each of our bases in Syria. And that means that it is not necessary to allocate much money for such an attack, especially since Israel has experience of breaking through air defense from behind mountains.
              1. svp67 20 January 2020 16: 47 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Alex2048
                Talk about the fact that we have two bases there, I'm sorry a little not about the money for the Russian Federation

                This is about the possibility of obtaining them. It is necessary that our exploiting capitalists learn to follow our tanks and make money, as they do around the world.
    2. Kasym 20 January 2020 19: 44 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Sergey, hi ! I also thought that aviation could have worked (several fighters and turntables are on duty on duty, and if you spot it in time) ... Or maybe the electronic warfare complex worked or the "Peresvet" check passes ... So it’s not necessary that the air defense systems were shot down ...
  • Piramidon 20 January 2020 10: 08 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Quote: Alex2048
    if we compare the number of attacks on the bases of the Russian Federation and the USA, the question arises: why are they always trying to kick our base shamelessly and often without reason and apparently not really fearing retaliation, while US bases are kicked less often and more often in retaliation for specific actions?

    The answer is obvious. Because of these attacks, the ears of the United States and its satellites peer out. Are they going to attack their breadwinners?
    1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 10: 19 New
      • 2
      • 6
      -4
      The answer is obvious. Because of these attacks, the ears of the United States and its satellites peer out. Are they going to attack their breadwinners?

      And the answer is not so obvious. More precisely, the conclusion with such an obvious answer for some reason is one-sided. Judging by the Russian media in Syria, it enjoys the support of the local population. Why doesn’t the local population attack the invaders and robbers represented by the USA? Why do not similar attacks on US bases occur?
      1. Piramidon 20 January 2020 10: 36 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Alex2048
        Why doesn’t the local population attack the invaders and robbers represented by the USA? Why do not similar attacks on US bases occur?

        The local population (namely the population) has a "hut from the edge." They don’t fight with anyone, they don’t attack anyone (except for children with stones), everything is like a drum to them. And barmalei, I repeat, will not attack their own
        1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 10: 56 New
          • 2
          • 5
          -3
          And barmalei, I repeat, will not attack their own

          And where did the barmalei who act for Assad go? Or are they happy with everything too?
          1. Piramidon 20 January 2020 11: 05 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: Alex2048
            And where did the barmalei who act for Assad go?

            Who are they? Can be more. About the armed forces of the Syrian state (Syrian Arab Army) I heard. Syrian Armed Forces formed after independence in 1946
            1. Aleks2048 20 January 2020 11: 26 New
              • 2
              • 4
              -2
              Syrian Arab Army

              Some in the west tried to enlist them as terrorists.
              Anyway. What is it that the United States in Syria more like the population of Syria than the Russian Federation?
              1. Piramidon 20 January 2020 11: 32 New
                • 4
                • 0
                +4
                Quote: Alex2048
                What is it that the United States in Syria more like the population of Syria than the Russian Federation?

                In many countries where foreign troops are present, the population does not like this, but it is silent in a rag and does not speak. There are few who want to go to partisans now.
  • aszzz888 20 January 2020 07: 32 New
    • 10
    • 3
    +7
    Squinting under the spirits, our enemy fulfills attacks with drones ... Who would make drones in idlib on their knees? Bearded? Mind is not enough. Of course, drones supply, and supply not tribes, but fully developed states, and which ones can be safely assumed.
    1. donavi49 20 January 2020 09: 27 New
      • 6
      • 4
      +2
      Well, of course - only the CIA can do this. Buy alik controller, dviglo, antenna. Close the reset circuit by hanging on plastic clamps. This is the 22nd century - super technologies.




      And here are the new kamikaze drone with a cumulative warhead. Explicitly from Mossad's secret technical laboratory wassat .


      Even the collective farmer from the video below - who just for the fan gathered himself an UAV, so that he controls the field with the map, at a much higher level. Collecting UAVs from the Iranian sets of Husits ​​are generally a civilization of Anunaki reptilians, compared to the women of the Idlib Design Bureau.
      1. Piramidon 20 January 2020 10: 46 New
        • 2
        • 2
        0
        Quote: donavi49
        Well, of course - only the CIA can do this. Buy alik controller, dviglo, antenna. Close the reset circuit by hanging on plastic clamps. This is the 22nd century - super technologies.

        This is Ukrainian know-how.


        http://military-informant.com/news/ukraintsy-izobreli-bespilotnik-s-granatoj.html
  • Tank jacket 20 January 2020 07: 34 New
    • 8
    • 5
    +3
    Turkey is transferring barmaley from Idlib to Libya. Haftar utilizes them. Soon the circle of aircraft models will be empty.
    1. knn54 20 January 2020 07: 58 New
      • 8
      • 1
      +7
      Judging by the navigation equipment, the ammunition dumping system, the aircraft model circle does not smell. Moreover, they work out the swarm attacks.
      1. Tank jacket 20 January 2020 08: 19 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        Well do daish (banned in the Russian Federation) -regular army of the United States.
      2. Svetlana 20 January 2020 08: 43 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Moreover, they work out the attacks of the "swarm".


        How do you know that there was that same "swarm" and not three independent pepelats?
      3. donavi49 20 January 2020 14: 00 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Yes? For example, a fresh downed drone on Pixhawk - costs 4000 on alik, you can search, it’s built on Mini APM Pro + an ordinary flash drive, it’s even suitable from the phone.


        Here is the GPS antenna and the module, here, apparently, the bum is only GPS. Rubles for 600.


        Well, high-tech ammunition mounting systems, it’s clear to everyone that only in secret military laboratories can they come up with this. Use plastic clamps - aerodynamic linings made from improvised materials, an ordinary person, but never ... Even a broken caliphate used 3D printing and normal rail-type pendants, not these clamps.
  • Monar 20 January 2020 07: 38 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    I am only interested in one thing. Than the "Shell" to shoot back.
  • Thrifty 20 January 2020 07: 38 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    And, if they had their own drone drones in service, then the answer would be faster and more efficient!
  • Professor 20 January 2020 07: 42 New
    • 10
    • 27
    -17
    In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.

    1. Not a “fact” of reflection, but a “message” of reflection.
    2. This is evidence that the militias have not yet been driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.
    3. Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.
    1. Volodin 20 January 2020 07: 56 New
      • 20
      • 1
      +19
      Quote: Professor
      Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

      And at the same time, think about the fact that the Iron Dome spends “lyamy” and “tons” of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.
      1. atalef 20 January 2020 08: 02 New
        • 2
        • 16
        -14
        Quote: Volodin
        Quote: Professor
        Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

        And at the same time, think about the fact that the Iron Dome spends “lyamy” and “tons” of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

        Alexei - you should remember this comment the next time you write about rockets from water pipes.
      2. loki565 20 January 2020 08: 10 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        And at the same time, think about the fact that the Iron Dome spends “lyamy” and “tons” of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

        Yeah and after a time they pierce him
      3. Professor 20 January 2020 09: 01 New
        • 2
        • 17
        -15
        Quote: Volodin
        Quote: Professor
        Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

        And at the same time, think about the fact that the Iron Dome spends “lyamy” and “tons” of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

        We think about it with every salvo of the LCD.

        Quote: loki565
        And at the same time, think about the fact that the Iron Dome spends “lyamy” and “tons” of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

        Yeah and after a time they pierce him

        With what a fright "breaks"? The LCD does not intercept missiles flying in the open, as shown in the video.
        1. Ramzaj99 20 January 2020 09: 32 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          Quote: Professor
          With what a fright "breaks"? The LCD does not intercept missiles flying in the open, as shown in the video.

          Autobahn chock full of cars is a deserted area ??
          Professor you are disappointing me))) Clumsy began to work, without fiction, slipped into a lie ... ah, ah .... You probably are the dome operator and select targets?))
          1. Professor 20 January 2020 09: 40 New
            • 3
            • 12
            -9
            Quote: Ramzaj99
            Autobahn chock full of cars is a deserted area ??

            It is a deserted area. There are no industrial enterprises, no military facilities, no settlements.

            Quote: Ramzaj99
            Professor you are disappointing me))) Clumsy began to work, without fiction, slipped into a lie ... ah, ah .... You probably are the dome operator and select targets?))

            Teach materiel.
            on September 6 2011
            https://topwar.ru/6584-zheleznyy-kupol-znaniya-a-glavnoe-opyt.html
      4. sivuch 20 January 2020 18: 17 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Yes, nothing to think about. The figures for the cost of Shell shells by the professor are taken from the ceiling.
    2. Monter 20 January 2020 08: 13 New
      • 12
      • 1
      +11
      Think about it. What would be the damage, destroy drones at least one SU35? And, if even worse, our flight crew would suffer, there is generally no price. You, as I understand it, bring down the penny "rockets" of the rebels (or militias?) With a fly swatter? Or, rolled up, with a newspaper?
    3. SNEAKY 20 January 2020 08: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      hi Tin. And how much does it cost to repair a plane damaged by an explosion, and the life of a soldier? Another question.
    4. Monar 20 January 2020 08: 29 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Is it possible? How did the "Shells" shoot?
    5. askort154 20 January 2020 08: 39 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Professor..... This is evidence that militias not yet driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.

      Already negotiate - not knocked out because, these "militias" are armed and treated by Israel together with Turkey.
      1. Professor 20 January 2020 09: 03 New
        • 2
        • 16
        -14
        Quote: askort154
        Professor..... This is evidence that militias not yet driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.

        Already negotiate - not knocked out because, these "militias" are armed and treated by Israel together with Turkey.

        Urgently to school for a geography lesson. Immediately master where the northwest of Syria is and where Israel is.
        1. askort154 20 January 2020 09: 46 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Professor..... Urgent to school for a geography lesson. Immediately master where northwest Syria and where Israel

          "professor," don't pretend to be! You know very well that Israel healed and supplied the so-called you "rebels", at their borders (in the south-west of Syria), and the Turks are doing the same at their border with Syria (in the north-west of Syria, where Idlib is located. yes hi
          1. Professor 20 January 2020 09: 53 New
            • 3
            • 12
            -9
            Quote: askort154
            Professor..... Urgent to school for a geography lesson. Immediately master where northwest Syria and where Israel

            "professor," don't pretend to be! You know very well that Israel healed and supplied the so-called you "rebels", at their borders (in the south-west of Syria), and the Turks are doing the same at their border with Syria (in the north-west of Syria, where Idlib is located. yes hi

            He treated the wounded Syrian citizens whose UN delivered to us.
            Provided with baby food, medicines and diapers through UN.
            1. askort154 20 January 2020 11: 26 New
              • 5
              • 2
              +3
              Professor.... He treated the wounded Syrian citizens whom the UN delivered to us.
              He supplied baby food, medicine and diapers through the UN.


              "professor," this noodles tongue hang up your "students."
              1. Professor 20 January 2020 12: 50 New
                • 1
                • 5
                -4
                Quote: askort154
                Professor.... He treated the wounded Syrian citizens whom the UN delivered to us.
                He supplied baby food, medicine and diapers through the UN.


                "professor," this noodles tongue hang up your "students."

                The materiel however is incontrovertible.
              2. Okolotochny 20 January 2020 12: 51 New
                • 4
                • 2
                +2
                "Professor," hang this tongue noodles for your "students."

                There is only one, with a mouse on av and he smoked all the textbooks)))
    6. Ramzaj99 20 January 2020 09: 26 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Professor
      1. Not a “fact” of reflection, but a “message” of reflection.

      Practice, practice))))
      However, the facts are stubborn.
      Everyone perfectly sees the consequences of attacks on the Russian base, usually debris. And the consequences on Amer’s, destruction and almost universal hospitalization of personnel from the shock experienced)))
    7. Piramidon 20 January 2020 10: 56 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      Quote: Professor
      This is evidence that militias not yet driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.

      The militias oppose you in the Palestinian Authority. In Syria - international terrorists hired, including with Jewish money.
      Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

      Do you know for sure that the Shell used rockets and all six? The guns on him did not notice, or did not want to notice? Are you there in Israel, so worried about the cost of Russian missiles? Costing your "Dome" is best done.
  • Cananecat 20 January 2020 08: 32 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    And in this case, I'm interested in another aspect ...
    ... well, intercepted, well, destroyed, but each drone works in a certain frequency band. We have no technology to detect emitters of these frequencies? Of course, you can score the frequency, but this is a struggle with the consequences, and not with the cause.
    1. Monar 20 January 2020 08: 41 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And what for him to work in a frequency band? You program the arduinka to fly the route along the jiries and that's it. Well, let the jeep signal be suppressed at the base. But the inertial will not stop working.
    2. donavi49 20 January 2020 09: 12 New
      • 1
      • 5
      -4
      How's that in the tube 70s ???

      Now everything is simpler.

      We take the controller on Alik. We connect it to the laptop (it’s possible for the old one for 399 dollars - you don’t even need to pull Win7, the software also plows perfectly on XP). Next, we prescribe a route for him, set the waypoints. After we fasten the controller to the frame. All. No radiation.

      Problems will only be if the satellite signal is extinguished (and Glonass too, and soon Beid too - already 3in1 controllers are in operation). But it doesn’t matter either - for a breakthrough in technology, it gave a compact ANN. Here it will go on it if the satellites shut down or the computer considers an anomaly (for example, a shift in position). Yes, compact ANNs give a big mistake. But let's say the last 8-10km in order to fall on the territory of AB - the accuracy of the ANN is enough.

      Therefore, no radiation. Consequently, EW will not work.

      And this is not the Mossad CIA. For example, a simple collective farmer collected from sticks and acorns, uses it for waypoints, in his fields.

  • arhitroll 20 January 2020 08: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why bases do not attack such drones ... pushes ...
  • Rostislav 20 January 2020 08: 42 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Different authors, different headings. Some escalate the situation with the very noisy heading, others shyly begin to hide, - "an attempt to attack." Although then everything is in its place - the next attack is repelled.
  • cniza 20 January 2020 08: 42 New
    • 4
    • 2
    +2
    In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.


    There is no better advertisement ...
  • Dikson 20 January 2020 09: 40 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    And why are there no comments on the resource about this nightly news? -... "The American troops did not let the Russian military who wanted to get to the oil field in Syria, the Turkish agency Anadolu reports ..."
    1. donavi49 20 January 2020 10: 08 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      AND? Well, once again blocked. This time with a video. In a box. The head with two cars and behind Oshkosh propped the tail of the column.


      They will now block every day. Allocate a strip for daily blocking?
  • Ros 56 20 January 2020 10: 34 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Or maybe those who want to attack ours are simply disposed of, and there will be less trouble? angry negative
  • 1536 20 January 2020 11: 52 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    American drones? And did the Yankees send them to bomb the Russian base in revenge that Russia accuses their troops of smuggling oil? But did anyone invite American troops to Syria? Does the US own oil fields in Syria? Or did the Pentagon switch to self-sufficiency and sell stolen oil to make ends meet?
    For good, it would be necessary to track where these UAVs take off and who controls them ...
    1. donavi49 20 January 2020 13: 50 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Here is the current raid - STELS TECHNOLOGIES are visible! Also innovative American electronics camouflaged at a Chinese price in 4000 rubles on Alik.




      Bomb load - pay attention to an innovative, super-sophisticated and technologically advanced system of fastening and dropping ammunition with plastic clamps wassat . Zone 51 clearly could not do without the latest technologies laughing
  • 4ekist 20 January 2020 12: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    ".... Most often, drones fly into the air from the territory of the province of Idlib, a significant part of the territory of which continues to remain under the occupation of terrorists ....."
    “But can’t it be compared with the level of the earth?
    1. donavi49 20 January 2020 13: 45 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      6000 square kilometers. Even if we discard the fact that the Sultan will wrap the tomatoes. In general, this is genocide in all media. That the current grouping - this is impossible.
    2. Piramidon 20 January 2020 16: 19 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: 4ekist
      ".... Most often, drones fly into the air from the territory of the province of Idlib, a significant part of the territory of which continues to remain under the occupation of terrorists ....."
      “But can’t it be compared with the level of the earth?

      Do you think that the barmalei are completely brainless and after launching the drones will sit in the same place and wait for an answer? Launched, faded, and then look for them later throughout the province. Especially if launches are made from the residential neighborhood
  • Old26 20 January 2020 13: 58 New
    • 4
    • 3
    +1
    Quote: novobranets
    Yes, a small group goal is an indicator. Amer’s “patriots” couldn’t even detect this, much less destroy it.

    Bravo, Vyacheslav !!! It is a pity that you can put only one plus, I would put twenty !!!! When I opened the topic, the first thought the balls were: “And how many posts the American Patriot will remember, How can it be without it. My friendly advice, in the topic of the fleet, try to illuminate from a comparison point of view the autonomy and seaworthiness of the American Nimitz aircraft carrier and our RTOs like river-sea “Buyan-M.” The comparison will be about the same as yours when you compare the “Shell.” Originally designed to hit such targets and the “Patriot,” And do not tell me, but our S-400 could hit these drones? I will wait for your reply .... crying

    Quote: rocket757
    They are experiencing various devices of attack and further things will continue like that.
    You really can’t find the ends in that mess that is everywhere there.
    Passive defense has its limit ... this is all in the experimental stage, on the part of the curators of the barmalei. But it is still!

    Not only that, Victor, that passive defense has its limit, but now the reliability of the defense of our air base is also determined by the fact that the militants are squeezed out into "de-escalation zones" and they do not roam throughout Syria.
    Remember the attack of the air base 3-4 years ago, when fighters fired at it from mortars. Photos of aircraft with holes then dazzled the entire Internet. We are lucky that now they are in the Idlib zone, and this is in a straight line to the air base about 70-80 km. Given the fact that the attack was carried out from the north-west, that is, from the sea, drones had to fly 130-150 kilometers.

    Quote: Magog
    EW can not be used in such clearly provocative attacks. It is obvious that the Americans, through militants, are trying to probe the possibilities and the principle of action of electronic warfare equipment.

    Then a few counter questions:
    1. Why do they need these electronic warfare equipment there, if they are not used
    2. How can we be guaranteed that a certain electronic warfare system that we have there will be effective against the same UAVs if it is not used? After all, only practical experience in use can guarantee that the electronic warfare system is operational

    Quote: Magog
    After the comic story with “Donald Cook” in the Black Sea in 2014, the “partners” provoked forces in the Crimea about a dozen times to repeat the focus, sending the destroyers of the same type there ...

    This is the story when the SU-24 used against the "Donald Cook" electronic warfare system, which he did not have ???
    A well-known story disavowed 6 years ago, but which is regularly used as an indicator of the coolness of our electronic warfare against the American destroyer

    Quote: Alex2048
    These are image acquisitions. This is not a direct income. The direct income from this could be attributed to the fact that, in theory, the S-400 was still manufactured in pieces, it had one price tag, and with continuous production, the price tag became smaller. This can be considered as direct income.

    Jokingly, they are made exclusively for export. The number of those who bought can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and even free fingers will remain. Only three countries bought this air defense system. Wishing - 3-4 more. But for them it’s really a piecewise option. And for the Russian Armed Forces, they are by no means manufactured in unit form. For 2020, it is planned to purchase a number of divisional sets and in total their number in the Russian Armed Forces will be 56. Fifty-six divisional sets

    Quote: Svetlana
    Moreover, they work out the attacks of the "swarm".


    How do you know that there was that same "swarm" and not three independent pepelats?

    And this begs for itself. It makes no sense to launch separate UAVs against a sufficiently equipped enemy. But the tactics of “swarm” are really interesting and they have been talking about it for at least 10 years. This is a more effective tactic than single UAVs. And while the UAV can be very simple. At one time, the issue of manned vehicles was even considered to create such a "swarm" on the basis of something resembling a motor-delta planes. But this is really an excess. But the simplest drones with one or two ammunition, and launched in the amount of several tens, if not hundreds, can cause significant harm.

    Quote: Ramzaj99
    Autobahn chock full of cars is a deserted area ??

    In principle, Oleg (Professor) is right. The autobahn is not the place behind the LCD. His main task is still the protection of settlements, enterprises, etc. And getting on a car moving at high speed on the autobahn is almost unbelievable. And I think that at the beginning of the shelling the movement may stop. But there will be no losses when hitting the autobahn

    Quote: 1536
    American drones?

    Most likely they can be Chinese, and spare parts purchased at Aliexpress

    Quote: 1536
    For good, it would be necessary to track where these UAVs take off and who controls them ...

    It’s known where they take off from somewhere. This is the province of Idlib. "Zone of de-escalation." Who controls? A little higher they wrote about a possible control algorithm
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Old26 20 January 2020 18: 02 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Quote: Piramidon
    Do you think that the barmalei are completely brainless and after launching the drones will sit in the same place and wait for an answer? Launched, faded, and then look for them later throughout the province. Especially if launches are made from the residential neighborhood

    Absolutely agree. When fired at the base of mortars, the shelling lasted one or two minutes, and then "on the gas." And after a couple of minutes these jeeps were no longer in the base area