Attempted to attack the air base of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria using drones

Syrian and Lebanese media report another militant attempt to attack the Russian Hmeimim air base in Latakia province.
The materials say that the militants used unmanned aerial vehicles armed with explosive devices.

It was planned to damage the military base of the Russian Aerospace Forces by the "dive method".

According to the latest information, the attack was repelled by air defense systems located at Khmeimim.

It is noted that the militants used three small-sized drone. The attack was carried out from the north-western direction in the dark. Most often, drones take to the air from the territory of the province of Idlib, a significant part of the territory of which continues to be under the occupation of terrorists.

The Russian military department reports that the Russian Air Force base in Syria is currently operating normally, there are no casualties or destruction.
Militant drones were neutralized.

At the moment, what kind of air defense systems were used by the Russian military to repel the attack are not reported. It can be assumed that we are talking about the use of shells.

In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.

Comments

[bessmertniy]

It seems that the defense of Khmeimim became really reliable once all three drones were neutralized.

[aszzz888]

bessmertniy (Victor) Today, 07: 24 NEW
0
It seems that the defense of Khmeimim has become really reliable once all three drones were able to neutralize.

I believe that there was no reason to doubt the "reliability of the defense" before.

[WILL]

It is necessary to maximally replicate such news in the media! The best advertising of Russian Weapons and not Come Up !!!

[novobranets]

Quote: ANIMAL

The best advertising of Russian Weapons and not Come Up !!!

Yes, a small group target is an indicator. Amer "patriots" could not even detect this, let alone destroy.

[Shurik70]

Good real check.
But with advertising it turns out only where they are fighting or have recently fought. Turkey, India, Serbia, Saudi Arabia ...
You must be able to fight at the front in the media. Previously, they did not know how to do it at all (that is why the USSR collapsed). But every year we can do better. And the United States is losing its skill, "resting on its laurels."

[xGibSoNx]

It seems that

It looks more like there is simply less news on Syria and more skillfully began to mask what is "not desirable to know"

[Dart2027]

Quote: xGibSoNx

and more skillfully began to mask what is "not desirable to know"

What exactly?

[rocket757]

They are experiencing various devices of attack and further things will continue like that.
You really can’t find the ends in that mess that is everywhere there.
Passive defense has its limit ... this is all in the experimental stage, on the part of the curators of the barmalei. But it is still!

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: rocket757

Passive defense has its limit ... this is all in the experimental stage, on the part of the curators of the barmalei. But it is still

Right. The way to break through air defense is to overload targets in a narrow area. But only if electronic warfare is successfully working on them, then the "flock" will not reach anywhere ... Apparently, this is what they are "trying" ... What is the point of attacking a well-protected object in small groups? Only as "reconnaissance in force", IMHO ...

[rocket757]

Concrete test. It’s not yet comprehensive, but it will come to that, the landfill is too convenient .... it’s easy to say there, I’m not me and not my pen! They bought, they say, on aliexpress or somewhere else. Go prove it later.
However, for our systems a specific test, namely foreign technology against ours.
We will simultaneously "move forward" !!!

[Aleksandr21]

Quote: rocket757

... They bought, they say, on aliexpress or somewhere else. Go prove it later.
However, for our systems a specific test, namely foreign technology against ours.
We will simultaneously "move forward" !!!

Most likely the way it is, Chinese civilian UAVs could buy on aliexpress and remake them to fit their needs. And in general, UAV fighters are mostly of artisan type, and of local production ... it is clear that we are not talking about Western vehicles (the serious UAVs that are used by the United States). In any case, it’s good that our air defense works, this is a huge plus.

[rocket757]

Quote: Aleksandr21

Most likely the way it is, Chinese civilian UAVs could buy on aliexpress and remake them to fit their needs.

You can buy a "piece of iron" anywhere, but here's what to put in her brains, even simple devices have them, an interesting control algorithm, this is already a serious experiment. The control program is already the work of serious specialists ... which can be easily disguised as "craftsmen". There are also enough of them.
In general, let's see, see.

[Rzzz]

Quote: Aleksandr21

Could buy on aliexpress Chinese civilian UAVs and remake them

Most likely they didn’t buy the devices themselves, but their key components - motors, batteries, servos, regulators, autopilots with sensors, GPS receivers and radio control.
The "firewood" themselves are quite simply made from mass-produced materials from the construction market.

[Magog]

Electronic warfare cannot be used for such obviously provocative attacks. It is obvious that the Americans, through the militants, are trying to probe the possibilities and principle of operation of electronic warfare systems. And this should remain a secret for the foe for as long as possible. After the comical story with the "Donald Cook" in the Black Sea in 2014, the "partners" provoked the forces in Crimea to repeat the trick about a dozen times by sending destroyers of the same type there ...

[pmkemcity]

You really can’t find the ends in that mess that is everywhere there.

Whose ears are sticking out and a hedgehog is understandable.

[rocket757]

Quote: pmkemcity

Whose ears are sticking out and a hedgehog is understandable.

There are not just all the ears, and donkey, and camel, and jackals ...

[pmkemcity]

Exactly! And right after them ...

[rocket757]

And that is "secret, secret, secret" for such a small group, accomplices.

[pmkemcity]

It's no secret that friends do not grow in the garden.

[rocket757]

Well, yes, they are grown on a field of miracles, in some kind of distant country.

[pmkemcity]

Unfortunately, a grown-up friend "suddenly appeared" ...

[rocket757]

Quote: pmkemcity

Unfortunately, a grown-up friend "suddenly appeared" ...

Probably undershot? when landing.

[pmkemcity]

Watered with fertilizers diluted with urine.

[Boa kaa]

Quote: rocket757

There are not just all the ears, and donkey, and camel, and jackals ...

Quote: pmkemcity

Exactly! And right after them ...

Really elephants !?
(Americans often write "the party of the elephant" for granted, implying Republicans , and this is Donya from Tramplin)

[Aleks2048]

In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.

And you can’t argue with that ...
But, there is, as it were, one more point that observers are silent about, consciously, or simply do not pay attention to it ... We and the United States have bases in Syria, while neither the Russian Federation nor the United States fully control the territory of Syria. .. To us, from all the media, along the way, they pour information about the fact that the Russian Federation is the key player in Syria ... And if you compare the number of attacks on the Russian and US bases, the question arises why our base is always trying to kick shamelessly and often without reason and apparently very afraid of retaliation, and US bases are kicking less often and more for specific actions? And somehow, the answer to this question leads to a slight dissonance from the fact that we are given to ordinary people in the Russian Federation for the truth in Syria and what is happening there.

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

And if you compare the number of attacks on the bases of the Russian Federation and the USA ...

How can you compare without information?

[Aleks2048]

I compared only the information available to me from the media. If you have access for comparison to other sources and you can share the data, I will be glad to have a constructive dialogue.

[Professor]

You compare what is not with what was not. They write about attacks on Russian bases once in a while (so that there are no leaks from the fighters with their mobile phones), they don’t write about attacks on American bases at all.

[Aleks2048]

It is also possible to draw conclusions from what has "leaked" into the media.
And "leaked" is not a little ... I think it is enough to do some analysis. I think that with a successful attack on the base, the attackers will start shouting about it so that they hear the media, and the latter will smash it and certainly either embellish or "smooth out the sharp corners."
So, acting within the framework of the concept that forwards of a successful attack are loudly blowing, or as in this case, the defenders are loudly blowing that the efforts of the attackers have been nullified and analysis can be conducted.
From the analysis, it turns out that despite the ostentatious "rubbishness" of the US air defense, no one really wants to kick the US bases (except for the latest Iranian (IRGC) attacks), while in the media it is quite so concretely replicated infa that the US is actually robbing Syria for itself allowing to be on the territory of the latter not only by troops, but also shamelessly pumping out hydrocarbons, which are subsequently sold on the world market.
At the same time, initially bringing peace to the territory of Syria, the Russian Federation, actively helping the legitimate government of Syria, including Assad, who does not have direct income from the "humanitarian" action, is getting attacks on its bases.
What is it? Deficiency in intelligence from the Russian Federation and the lack of data on possible threats to the base? Deficiencies in the response from the Russian Federation in relation to persons who allow themselves to strike at our bases? Or something else?

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

It is also possible to draw conclusions from what has "leaked" into the media.

Not allowed.

Quote: Alex2048

And "leaked" is not a little ... I think it is enough to do some analysis. I think that with a successful attack on the base, the attackers will start shouting about it so that they hear the media, and the latter will smash it and certainly either embellish or "smooth out the sharp corners."

You may not know much or not much has leaked. from the word "absolutely". You do not monitor mass media, blogs, militia digests and do not know whether they "shout" or not.

Quote: Alex2048

So, acting within the framework of the concept that forwards of a successful attack are loudly blowing, or as in this case, the defenders are loudly blowing that the efforts of the attackers have been nullified and analysis can be conducted.
From the analysis, it turns out that despite the ostentatious "rubbishness" of the US air defense, no one really wants to kick the US bases (except for the latest Iranian (IRGC) attacks), while in the media it is quite so concretely replicated infa that the US is actually robbing Syria for itself allowing to be on the territory of the latter not only by troops, but also shamelessly pumping out hydrocarbons, which are subsequently sold on the world market.

There is no ANALYSIS due to the complete lack of input data. Nothing to analyze.

Quote: Alex2048

At the same time, initially bringing peace to the territory of Syria, the Russian Federation, actively helping the legitimate government of Syria, including Assad, who does not have direct income from the "humanitarian" action, is getting attacks on its bases.

Tell us about "bringing peace" to the victims of 100 missile and bomb strikes. Oh yes. More than 100 airstrikes and no casualties. The main thing here is not to fall into the hands of those to whom you are bringing the world. Not grateful creatures will tear apart into souvenirs.

Quote: Alex2048

What is it? Deficiency in intelligence from the Russian Federation and the lack of data on possible threats to the base? Deficiencies in the response from the Russian Federation in relation to persons who allow themselves to strike at our bases? Or something else?

Lack of information.

[Aleks2048]

Not allowed.

Why is it so peremptory?
If you have any other data, share ... I would be very curious.

Tell us about "bringing peace" to the victims of 100 missile and bomb strikes. Oh yes. More than 100 airstrikes and no casualties. The main thing here is not to fall into the hands of those to whom you are bringing the world. Not grateful creatures will tear apart into souvenirs.

Here I am about the same ...
Hence the conclusion to the next question is not very hospitable. What are the true goals of finding the Russian Federation in Syria? And after answering it, you can already talk about the success of the Syrian company for the Russian Federation or about failure. And here it will already be possible to talk about a more complete analysis.

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

Why is it so peremptory?
If you have any other data, share ... I would be very curious.

Since neither you nor I have complete information for any analysis. This time.
Militias report success daily on infidels. Their statements should not be taken into account because of their deceit. These are two.
The losses of the military personnel of the Russian Federation are classified by law and their cell phones were seized at their base in Syria. These are three.

Quote: Alex2048

Hence the conclusion to the next question is not very hospitable. What are the true goals of finding the Russian Federation in Syria? And after answering it, you can already talk about the success of the Syrian company for the Russian Federation or about failure. And here it will already be possible to talk about a more complete analysis.

And really, what are the goals of the arrival of the Russian Federation in Syria?

[Aleks2048]

But on this subject you can speculate ...

And really, what are the goals of the arrival of the Russian Federation in Syria?

When in September 2015, military assistance to the Syrian government officially began, in principle, everything was in my opinion competently ... It was quite possible for myself, under the guise of fighting ISIS, to carry out an operation to prevent the construction of pipelines capable of connecting Arab hydrocarbons and Europe. But this is what began later, when the media hatred and the opposition of the "Russian world" to European values ​​began to flow, it became clear that, in general, the sabotage operation was outgrowing its scale and out of control. Goals began to appear to justify two permanent bases. What for? Unclear. The goals of the need to develop Russian business in Syria began to appear. At the same time, no one asked the Russian business whether he wants to go to Syria or it is more convenient for him to "suck" his beloved state out of habit. Some at some point in time, in my opinion, completely lost their minds and offered to look for ISIS cells in the Philippines, Brunei and Indonesia. Etc...
All these arguments involuntarily suggest the idea that it was time to turn off the bench in Syria for a long time. But urapatriots have not yet realized all their ambitions and not all state money has been diverted to goals that are far from the commercial interests of the Russian Federation.
All the same, the question again arises: what are the goals of the Russian Federation’s stay in Syria today? Domestic political? Is it worth it?

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

Under the cover of fighting ISIS, an operation to prevent the construction of pipelines capable of connecting Arab hydrocarbons and Europe was underway

No such goals were announced.

Quote: Alex2048

All the same, the question again arises: what are the goals of the Russian Federation’s stay in Syria today? Domestic political? Is it worth it?

What are the official goals?

[Aleks2048]

No such goals were announced.

And I'm not saying that only stated goals are suitable for analysis.

What are the official goals?

Unfortunately, they have recently ceased to be voiced.

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

No such goals were announced.

And I'm not saying that only stated goals are suitable for analysis.

What are the official goals?

Unfortunately, they have recently ceased to be voiced.

Considering the gas pipeline as a goal is not serious. Geography allows you to build it bypassing Syria. Which by the way is already happening.

Quote: _Ugene_

one main goal has always been officially voiced - the fight against international terrorism

So the goals are not achieved. International terrorism is alive and well.

[Aleks2048]

Considering the gas pipeline as a goal is not serious. Geography allows you to build it bypassing Syria. Which by the way is already happening.

It was simply cheaper via Syria. Well, and what kind of building?

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

Considering the gas pipeline as a goal is not serious. Geography allows you to build it bypassing Syria. Which by the way is already happening.

It was simply cheaper via Syria. Well, and what kind of building?

Cheaper? Why on earth?
Build from Israel through Greece to Europe.

[Aleks2048]

Build from Israel through Greece to Europe.

Sorry, Israel is certainly an important state, but the light did not converge on it. For Europe, the supply of hydrocarbons through the pipe from the UAE is more important. These supplies may affect the energy independence of Europe from Russia, and Israel is small. Under the control of Iraq and Libya with Israel, there is not enough territory of Syria to lay a pipe.

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

Build from Israel through Greece to Europe.

Sorry, Israel is certainly an important state, but the light did not converge on it. For Europe, the supply of hydrocarbons through the pipe from the UAE is more important. These supplies may affect the energy independence of Europe from Russia, and Israel is small. Under the control of Iraq and Libya with Israel, there is not enough territory of Syria to lay a pipe.

There would be a pipe from Israel, and to Israel with the UAE it should be stretched out like 2 fingers ...

[Aleks2048]

There would be a pipe from Israel

Obviously, with Syria, no one would need a pipe from Israel. The price tag just rolls over.

[Aleks2048]

and to Israel with the UAE, to stretch it altogether like 2 fingers ...

Oh, no matter how problems start in Jordan.

[Professor]

Quote: Alex2048

There would be a pipe from Israel

Obviously, with Syria, no one would need a pipe from Israel. The price tag just rolls over.

We need this pipe, independent of Syria.

Quote: Alex2048

and to Israel with the UAE, to stretch it altogether like 2 fingers ...

Oh, no matter how problems start in Jordan.

Jordan does not stand in the way of the chimney.

[_Ugene_]

So the goals are not achieved. International terrorism is alive and well.

so the goal was stated - the fight against terrorism and not an unconditional victory over international terrorism there are clearly some successes

[Professor]

Quote: _Ugene_

So the goals are not achieved. International terrorism is alive and well.

so the goal was stated - the fight against terrorism and not an unconditional victory over international terrorism there are clearly some successes

The goal of participation, not victory? Well, just like an olympiad.

[_Ugene_]

The goal of participation, not victory? Well, just like an olympiad.

the goal of victory in a particular place and not in the whole world, it has not been achieved yet, but it’s stupid to deny success, and to set a goal to defeat international terrorism around the world no one can do now

[Professor]

Quote: _Ugene_

The goal of participation, not victory? Well, just like an olympiad.

the goal is victory in a particular place and not around the world, it has not yet been achieved but success it’s stupid to deny, and the goal is to defeat international terrorism around the world no one can do now

As in the anecdote about Napoleon and oil: "it is already smeared, but it still stinks."

[_Ugene_]

Well, you can formulate it that way, it already depends on the degree of bias of a particular individual

[_Ugene_]

one main goal has always been officially voiced - the fight against international terrorism

[Aleks2048]

one main goal has always been officially voiced - the fight against international terrorism

Then the question ... Why were they limited only to Syria?

[_Ugene_]

Then the question ... Why were they limited only to Syria?

we are not the USA, the whole world does not sponsor us, the budget is limited

[Okolotochny]

Colleague, stop feeding about the American troll, not horse feed)))

[svp67]

Quote: Alex2048

they always try to kick our base shamelessly and often without reason and apparently not really fearing retaliation, and do US bases kick less and more often in revenge for specific actions?

You have a "mess" in your head. That is, it turns out that our base, with the personnel bored there from idleness, is only the same as our pilots, the lazy enemy will not kick? Yes, our planes can make a huge number of air sorties per day, I would like to note the COMBAT. Even the Americans admit that they did not expect our aviation to be capable of such a load, and even apart from the main supply points.
So that any such attempt to harm us there has all the reasons and reasons.
And at the expense of the Americans, I will remind you of one saying that few "who bite the hand giving", I will also add an indicating ...

[Aleks2048]

I don’t know about the cereal in my head ...
And here to the very point ...

And at the expense of the Americans, I will remind you of one saying that few "who bite the hand giving", I will also add an indicating ...

There is a feeling that the Russian Federation in Syria with a mission to free the world from ISIS and free the Syrian people is apparently out of place now.

[svp67]

Quote: Alex2048

There is a feeling that the Russian Federation in Syria with a mission to free the world from ISIS and free the Syrian people is apparently out of place now.

That is, you support the point of view of ISIS and the United States?

[Aleks2048]

Quote: svp67

That is, you support the point of view of ISIS and the United States?

Not at all.
What is the conclusion?
I just think what specific goals the Russian Federation pursues in Syria and what are the results of our work?
I just think that the funds are not small and when they will be "repulsed" by net income, and not by talking about the fact that the Russian Federation is a key player, talking about the fact that our air defense is the best ... and so on ... I mean, when will the acquisitions from our presence in Syria cease to be of an image character, but will be embodied in real money?
Conversations that we have two bases there are, forgive me, a little not about money for the Russian Federation. More precisely, these are conversations about direct losses for the Russian Federation, these two bases need to be maintained. The value of these bases can only be seen during the Cold War with the West. In the event of a direct military clash between the Russian Federation and NATO, these are simply two lost bases and wasted resources.

[dzvero]

and embodied in real money?

In BV, it’s almost the turn to purchase Russian weapons. But UTB real money and considerable.

With a possible variant of a direct military clash between the Russian Federation and NATO, these are simply two lost bases and wasted resources.

Here the question can be posed differently - how much resources will be diverted from NATO by the destruction of these two bases.

[Aleks2048]

In BV, it’s almost the turn to purchase Russian weapons. But UTB real money and considerable.

These are image acquisitions. This is not a direct income. The direct income from this could be attributed to the fact that, in theory, the S-400 was still manufactured in pieces, it had one price tag, and with continuous production, the price tag became smaller. This can be considered as direct income.

Here the question can be posed differently - how much resources will be diverted from NATO by the destruction of these two bases.

I'm afraid that in a real war there are not many. You do not think that they will be destroyed by a massive non-nuclear missile strike. All the same, there is nothing more reliable than a nuclear strike on each of our bases in Syria. And that means that it is not necessary to allocate much money for such an attack, especially since Israel has experience of breaking through air defense from behind mountains.

[svp67]

Quote: Alex2048

Talk about the fact that we have two bases there, I'm sorry a little not about the money for the Russian Federation

This is about the possibility of obtaining them. It is necessary that our exploiting capitalists learn to follow our tanks and make money, as they do around the world.

[Kasym]

Sergey, ! I also thought that the aviation could have worked (there are definitely several fighters and turntables on alert, and if you spot them in time) ... Or maybe the electronic warfare complex worked or the "Peresvet" test passes ... So it is not necessary that the air defense system was shot down ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: Alex2048

if we compare the number of attacks on the bases of the Russian Federation and the USA, the question arises: why are they always trying to kick our base shamelessly and often without reason and apparently not really fearing retaliation, while US bases are kicked less often and more often in retaliation for specific actions?

The answer is obvious. Because of these attacks, the ears of the United States and its satellites peer out. Are they going to attack their breadwinners?

[Aleks2048]

The answer is obvious. Because of these attacks, the ears of the United States and its satellites peer out. Are they going to attack their breadwinners?

And the answer is not so obvious. More precisely, the conclusion with such an obvious answer for some reason is one-sided. Judging by the Russian media in Syria, it enjoys the support of the local population. Why doesn’t the local population attack the invaders and robbers represented by the USA? Why do not similar attacks on US bases occur?

[Piramidon]

Quote: Alex2048

Why doesn’t the local population attack the invaders and robbers represented by the USA? Why do not similar attacks on US bases occur?

The local population (namely the population) has a "hut on the edge". They do not fight with anyone, do not attack anyone (except for children with stones), they do not care about anything. And the barmaley, I repeat, will not attack their own

[Aleks2048]

And barmalei, I repeat, will not attack their own

And where did the barmalei who act for Assad go? Or are they happy with everything too?

[Piramidon]

Quote: Alex2048

And where did the barmalei who act for Assad go?

Who are they? Can be more. About the armed forces of the Syrian state (Syrian Arab Army) I heard. Syrian Armed Forces formed after independence in 1946

[Aleks2048]

Syrian Arab Army

Some in the west tried to enlist them as terrorists.
Anyway. What is it that the United States in Syria more like the population of Syria than the Russian Federation?

[Piramidon]

Quote: Alex2048

What is it that the United States in Syria more like the population of Syria than the Russian Federation?

In many countries where foreign troops are present, the population does not like this, but it is silent in a rag and does not speak. There are few who want to go to partisans now.

[aszzz888]

Squinting under the spirits, our enemy fulfills attacks with drones ... Who would make drones in idlib on their knees? Bearded? Mind is not enough. Of course, drones supply, and supply not tribes, but fully developed states, and which ones can be safely assumed.

[donavi49]

Well, of course - only the CIA can do this. Buy alik controller, dviglo, antenna. Close the reset circuit by hanging on plastic clamps. This is the 22nd century - super technologies.

And here are the new kamikaze drone with a cumulative warhead. Explicitly from Mossad's secret technical laboratory .

Even the collective farmer from the video below - who just for the fan gathered himself an UAV, so that he controls the field with the map, at a much higher level. Collecting UAVs from the Iranian sets of Husits ​​are generally a civilization of Anunaki reptilians, compared to the women of the Idlib Design Bureau.

[Piramidon]

Quote: donavi49

Well, of course - only the CIA can do this. Buy alik controller, dviglo, antenna. Close the reset circuit by hanging on plastic clamps. This is the 22nd century - super technologies.

This is Ukrainian know-how.

http://military-informant.com/news/ukraintsy-izobreli-bespilotnik-s-granatoj.html

[Tank jacket]

Turkey is transferring barmaley from Idlib to Libya. Haftar utilizes them. Soon the circle of aircraft models will be empty.

[knn54]

Here, judging by the navigation equipment, the ammunition dumping system, it does not smell like an aircraft model circle. Moreover, the "swarm" attacks are being practiced.

[Tank jacket]

Well do daish (banned in the Russian Federation) -regular army of the United States.

[Svetlana]

Moreover, they are practicing swarm attacks.

How do you know that there was the same "swarm" and not three independent pepelats?

[donavi49]

Yes? For example, a fresh downed drone on Pixhawk - costs 4000 on alik, you can search, it’s built on Mini APM Pro + an ordinary flash drive, it’s even suitable from the phone.

Here is the GPS antenna and the module, here, apparently, the bum is only GPS. Rubles for 600.

Well, high-tech ammunition mounting systems, it’s clear to everyone that only in secret military laboratories can they come up with this. Use plastic clamps - aerodynamic linings made from improvised materials, an ordinary person, but never ... Even a broken caliphate used 3D printing and normal rail-type pendants, not these clamps.

[Monar]

There is only one thing that interests me. Than "Shell" to shoot back.

[Thrifty]

And, if they had their own drone drones in service, then the answer would be faster and more efficient!

[Professor]

In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.

1. Not the "fact" of the reflection, but the "messages" about the reflection.
2. This is evidence that the militias have not yet been driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.
3. Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

[Volodin]

Quote: professor

Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

And at the same time think about the fact that the "Iron Dome" is spending "lamas" and "tons" of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

[atalef]

Quote: Volodin

Quote: professor

Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

And at the same time think about the fact that the "Iron Dome" is spending "lamas" and "tons" of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

Alexei - you should remember this comment the next time you write about rockets from water pipes.

[loki565]

And at the same time think about the fact that the "Iron Dome" is spending "lamas" and "tons" of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

Yeah and after a time they pierce him

[Professor]

Quote: Volodin

Quote: professor

Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

And at the same time think about the fact that the "Iron Dome" is spending "lamas" and "tons" of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

We think about it with every salvo of the LCD.

Quote: loki565

And at the same time think about the fact that the "Iron Dome" is spending "lamas" and "tons" of American rubles to intercept Palestinian blanks.

Yeah and after a time they pierce him

With what fright "breaks through"? LCD does not intercept missiles flying into open areas as shown in the video.

[Ramzaj99]

Quote: professor

With what fright "breaks through"? LCD does not intercept missiles flying into open areas as shown in the video.

Autobahn chock full of cars is a deserted area ??
Professor you are disappointing me))) Clumsy began to work, without fiction, slipped into a lie ... ah, ah .... You probably are the dome operator and select targets?))

[Professor]

Quote: Ramzaj99

Autobahn chock full of cars is a deserted area ??

It is a deserted area. There are no industrial enterprises, no military facilities, no settlements.

Quote: Ramzaj99

Professor you are disappointing me))) Clumsy began to work, without fiction, slipped into a lie ... ah, ah .... You probably are the dome operator and select targets?))

Teach materiel.
on September 6 2011
https://topwar.ru/6584-zheleznyy-kupol-znaniya-a-glavnoe-opyt.html

[sivuch]

Yes, nothing to think about. The figures for the cost of Shell shells by the professor are taken from the ceiling.

[Monter]

Think about it. What would be the damage, destroy drones at least one SU35? And, if even worse, our flight crew would suffer, there is generally no price. You, as I understand it, bring down the penny "rockets" of the rebels (or militias?) With a fly swatter? Or, rolled up, with a newspaper?

[SNEAKY]

Tin. And how much does it cost to repair a plane damaged by an explosion, and the life of a soldier? Another question.

[Monar]

Can I get some info? How did the "Shells" shoot?

[askort154]

Professor..... This is evidence that militias not yet driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.

Speak out - not knocked out because these "opolchentsev" arms and treats Israel together with Turkey.

[Professor]

Quote: askort154

Professor..... This is evidence that militias not yet driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.

Speak out - not knocked out because these "opolchentsev" arms and treats Israel together with Turkey.

Urgently to school for a geography lesson. Immediately master where the northwest of Syria is and where Israel is.

[askort154]

Professor..... Urgent to school for a geography lesson. Immediately master where northwest Syria and where Israel

"professor", don't pretend! You know very well that Israel healed and supplied the so-called you "rebels", at their borders (in the south-west of Syria), and the Turks are doing the same at their border with Syria (in the north-west of Syria, where Idlib is located.

[Professor]

Quote: askort154

Professor..... Urgent to school for a geography lesson. Immediately master where northwest Syria and where Israel

"professor", don't pretend! You know very well that Israel healed and supplied the so-called you "rebels", at their borders (in the south-west of Syria), and the Turks are doing the same at their border with Syria (in the north-west of Syria, where Idlib is located.

He treated the wounded Syrian citizens whose UN delivered to us.
Provided with baby food, medicines and diapers through UN.

[askort154]

Professor.... He treated the wounded Syrian citizens whom the UN delivered to us.
He supplied baby food, medicine and diapers through the UN.

"professor", these noodles hang up to your "students".

[Professor]

Quote: askort154

Professor.... He treated the wounded Syrian citizens whom the UN delivered to us.
He supplied baby food, medicine and diapers through the UN.

"professor", these noodles hang up to your "students".

The materiel however is incontrovertible.

[Okolotochny]

"Professor", hang these tongue noodles to your "students".

There is only one, with a mouse on av and he smoked all the textbooks)))

[Ramzaj99]

Quote: professor

1. Not the "fact" of the reflection, but the "messages" about the reflection.

Practice, practice))))
However, the facts are stubborn.
Everyone perfectly sees the consequences of attacks on the Russian base, usually debris. And the consequences on Amer’s, destruction and almost universal hospitalization of personnel from the shock experienced)))

[Piramidon]

Quote: professor

This is evidence that militias not yet driven out of the northwestern regions of Syria.

The militias oppose you in the Palestinian Authority. In Syria - international terrorists hired, including with Jewish money.

Three drones cost less than 3 tons of American rubles, 6 Shell missiles more than lyama in the same currency. There is something to think about.

Do you know for sure that Shell used missiles and all six? Didn't you notice the guns on it, or didn't you want to notice? Are you in Israel so worried about the cost of Russian missiles? Calculate your "Dome" better.

[Cananecat]

And in this case, I'm interested in another aspect ...
... well, intercepted, well, destroyed, but each drone works in a certain frequency band. We have no technology to detect emitters of these frequencies? Of course, you can score the frequency, but this is a struggle with the consequences, and not with the cause.

[Monar]

And what for him to work in a frequency band? You program the arduinka to fly the route along the jiries and that's it. Well, let the jeep signal be suppressed at the base. But the inertial will not stop working.

[donavi49]

How's that in the tube 70s ???

Now everything is simpler.

We take the controller on Alik. We connect it to the laptop (it’s possible for the old one for 399 dollars - you don’t even need to pull Win7, the software also plows perfectly on XP). Next, we prescribe a route for him, set the waypoints. After we fasten the controller to the frame. All. No radiation.

Problems will only be if the satellite signal is extinguished (and Glonass too, and soon Beid too - already 3in1 controllers are in operation). But it doesn’t matter either - for a breakthrough in technology, it gave a compact ANN. Here it will go on it if the satellites shut down or the computer considers an anomaly (for example, a shift in position). Yes, compact ANNs give a big mistake. But let's say the last 8-10km in order to fall on the territory of AB - the accuracy of the ANN is enough.

Therefore, no radiation. Consequently, EW will not work.

And this is not the Mossad CIA. For example, a simple collective farmer collected from sticks and acorns, uses it for waypoints, in his fields.

[archiroll]

Why bases do not attack such drones ... pushes ...

[Rostislav]

Different authors, different titles. Some of them are aggravating the situation by the very loud headline, others are beginning to hide bashfully - "an attempt to attack." Although then everything is in place - the next attack is repelled.

[cniza]

In any case, the fact of repelling an air strike is another proof of the effectiveness of the air defense system built by the Russian military.

There is no better advertisement ...

[Dikson]

Why are there no comments on the resource regarding this nightly news? -... "American troops did not allow the Russian military who wanted to get to the oil field in Syria, reports the Turkish Anadolu news agency ..."

[donavi49]

AND? Well, once again blocked. This time with a video. In a box. The head with two cars and behind Oshkosh propped the tail of the column.


They will now block every day. Allocate a strip for daily blocking?

[Ros 56]

Or maybe those who want to attack ours are simply disposed of, and there will be less trouble?

[1536]

American drones? And did the Yankees send them to bomb the Russian base in revenge that Russia accuses their troops of smuggling oil? But did anyone invite American troops to Syria? Does the US own oil fields in Syria? Or did the Pentagon switch to self-sufficiency and sell stolen oil to make ends meet?
For good, it would be necessary to track where these UAVs take off and who controls them ...

[donavi49]

Here is the current raid - STELS TECHNOLOGIES are visible! Also innovative American electronics camouflaged at a Chinese price in 4000 rubles on Alik.

Bomb load - pay attention to an innovative, super-sophisticated and technologically advanced system of fastening and dropping ammunition with plastic clamps . Zone 51 clearly could not do without the latest technologies

[4ekist]

".... Most often, drones take off from the territory of the Idlib province, a significant part of the territory of which remains under the occupation of terrorists ....."
“But can’t it be compared with the level of the earth?

[donavi49]

6000 square kilometers. Even if we discard the fact that the Sultan will wrap the tomatoes. In general, this is genocide in all media. That the current grouping - this is impossible.

[Piramidon]

Quote: 4ekist

".... Most often, drones take off from the territory of the Idlib province, a significant part of the territory of which remains under the occupation of terrorists ....."
“But can’t it be compared with the level of the earth?

Do you think that the barmalei are completely brainless and after launching the drones will sit in the same place and wait for an answer? Launched, faded, and then look for them later throughout the province. Especially if launches are made from the residential neighborhood

[Old26]

Quote: novobranets

Yes, a small group target is an indicator. Amer "patriots" could not even detect this, let alone destroy.

Bravo, Vyacheslav !!! It is a pity that you can bet only one plus, I would bet twenty !!!! When I opened the topic, my first thought was the following: "And after how many posts will the American Patriot be remembered, How can we do without it. My friendly advice, in the topic of the fleet, try to highlight in terms of comparison the autonomy and seaworthiness of an American aircraft carrier of the Nimitz type and our MRK type river-sea "Buyan-M". There will be a comparison about the same as yours when you compare "Pantsir". Originally intended to defeat such targets and "Patriot", And don't tell me, but our S-400 could Will these drones hit? I will wait for your answer ....

Quote: rocket757

They are experiencing various devices of attack and further things will continue like that.
You really can’t find the ends in that mess that is everywhere there.
Passive defense has its limit ... this is all in the experimental stage, on the part of the curators of the barmalei. But it is still!

Moreover, Viktor, passive defense has its limits, so now the reliability of the defense of our airbase is also determined by the fact that the militants are squeezed out into the "de-escalation zone", and they do not run around the entire territory of Syria.
Remember the attack of the air base 3-4 years ago, when fighters fired at it from mortars. Photos of aircraft with holes then dazzled the entire Internet. We are lucky that now they are in the Idlib zone, and this is in a straight line to the air base about 70-80 km. Given the fact that the attack was carried out from the north-west, that is, from the sea, drones had to fly 130-150 kilometers.

Quote: Magog

EW can not be used in such clearly provocative attacks. It is obvious that the Americans, through militants, are trying to probe the possibilities and the principle of action of electronic warfare equipment.

Then a few counter questions:
1. Why do they need these electronic warfare equipment there, if they are not used
2. How can we be guaranteed that a certain electronic warfare system that we have there will be effective against the same UAVs if it is not used? After all, only practical experience in use can guarantee that the electronic warfare system is operational

Quote: Magog

After the comical story with the "Donald Cook" in the Black Sea in 2014, the "partners" provoked the forces in Crimea to repeat the trick about a dozen times by sending destroyers of the same type there ...

This is the story when the SU-24 used an electronic warfare system against "Donald Cook", which he did not have ???
A well-known story disavowed 6 years ago, but which is regularly used as an indicator of the coolness of our electronic warfare against the American destroyer

Quote: Alex2048

These are image acquisitions. This is not a direct income. The direct income from this could be attributed to the fact that, in theory, the S-400 was still manufactured in pieces, it had one price tag, and with continuous production, the price tag became smaller. This can be considered as direct income.

Jokingly, they are made exclusively for export. The number of those who bought can be counted on the fingers of one hand, and even free fingers will remain. Only three countries bought this air defense system. Wishing - 3-4 more. But for them it’s really a piecewise option. And for the Russian Armed Forces, they are by no means manufactured in unit form. For 2020, it is planned to purchase a number of divisional sets and in total their number in the Russian Armed Forces will be 56. Fifty-six divisional sets

Quote: Svetlana

Moreover, they are practicing swarm attacks.

How do you know that there was the same "swarm" and not three independent pepelats?

And this suggests itself. It makes no sense to launch separate UAVs against a sufficiently equipped enemy. But the "swarm" tactics are really interesting and they have been talking about it for at least 10 years. This is a more effective tactic than single drones. And yet UAVs can be very simple. At one time, even the question of manned vehicles was considered to create such a "swarm" on the basis of something resembling motor-deltaplanes. But this is really an overkill. But the simplest drones with one or two ammunition, and launched in an amount of several dozen, if not hundreds, can cause significant harm.

Quote: Ramzaj99

Autobahn chock full of cars is a deserted area ??

In principle, Oleg (Professor) is right. The Autobahn is not the place that "ZhK" is hiding behind. Its main task is still to protect settlements, enterprises, etc. And getting in a car moving at high speed on the Autobahn is almost unbelievable. And I think that when the shelling begins, the movement may stop. But there will be no losses when hitting the Autobahn

Quote: 1536

American drones?

Most likely, they can be Chinese, and spare parts were bought at Aliexpress.

Quote: 1536

For good, it would be necessary to track where these UAVs take off and who controls them ...

From where they take off roughly - we know. This is the province of Idlib. "De-escalation zone". Who is in charge? We wrote a little higher about a possible control algorithm

[Old26]

Quote: Piramidon

Do you think that the barmalei are completely brainless and after launching the drones will sit in the same place and wait for an answer? Launched, faded, and then look for them later throughout the province. Especially if launches are made from the residential neighborhood

Absolutely agree. When they fired at the base from mortars, the shelling lasted one or two minutes, and then "on gases". And after another couple of minutes these jeeps were no longer in the base area