Mishustin will not review pension reform

201
Mishustin will not review pension reform

ЧудР° РЅРµ РїСЂРѕРёР · РѕС € Р »Рѕ. Р'С ‹РґРІРёРЅСѓС‚С‹ Р№ РІ РєР ° С ‡ естве РєР ° РЅРґРёРґР ° тР° РЅР ° РІРѕСЃС ІРІР ... F ° Röhr "RњRoS € SѓSЃS,RoRЅ RѕRґRЅRѕR · RЅR ° C ‡ RЅRѕ RІS <SЃRєR ° R · R ° R" SЃSЏ RїRѕ RїRѕRІRѕRґSѓ RїRμRЅSЃRoRѕRЅRЅRѕR№ SЂRμS "RѕSЂRјS <RѕS,RјRμS,RoRІ RЅR ° RІRѕRїSЂRѕSЃ RІRѕR of the PS · RјRѕR¶ РЅРѕР№ РµС 'отмене. RќR ° RїRѕRјRЅRoRј, SЂRμS ‡ SЊ RoRґS'S, of the PS RїRѕSЌS,R ° RїRЅRѕRј RїRѕRІS <C € RμRЅRoRo RїRμRЅSЃRoRѕRЅRЅRѕRіRѕ RІRѕR · SЂR ° SЃS,R SЃ 55 ° F RґRѕ 60 "RμS, Sѓ R¶RμRЅS ‰ RoRЅ Ryo SЃ 60 RґRѕ 65 Сѓ РјСѓР¶С ‡ РёРЅ.

РџРѕРєР ° РµС ‰ С 'РґРµР№СЃС‚РІСѓСЋС ‰ РёР№ РіР »Р ° РІР ° ФедерР° Р» СЊРЅРѕР№ РЅР ° Р »РсРіРѕРІРѕРёС °Р °Р °Р °Р °Р ±Р °Р ±Р ±Р ±Р ±Р ±Р ±Р ±Р ±Р ±Р R ° R »СЃСЏ против отмены пенсионной СЂРµС „РѕСЂРјС‹. RЎRІRѕS 'P · P ° SЏRІR "RμRЅRoRμ RњRoS ... F ° Röhr" RњRoS € SѓSЃS,RoRЅ SЃRґRμR "P ° P" ° RЅR RІSЃS,SЂRμS ‡ Rμ SЃ RїSЂRμRґSЃS,R ° RІRoS,RμR "SЏRјRo RґSѓRјSЃRєRѕR№ C" SЂR ° RєS † RyoRo RљRџR R¤.



RџRѕ SЃR "RѕRІR ° Rј RґRμRїSѓS,R ° S,R ° F" RѕSЃRґSѓRјS <RѕS, SѓRїRѕRјSЏRЅSѓS,RѕR№ C "SЂR ° RєS † RoRo RЎRμSЂRіRμSЏ RћR ± SѓS ... RѕRІR °, RєR ° RЅRґRoRґR ° C RЅR ° RїRѕSЃS, RіR »Р ° РІС‹ РїСЂР ° вительствР° Р · Р ° СЏРІРёР» Р ± СѓРєРІР ° Р »СЊРЅРѕ СЃР» РµРґСѓСЋС ‰ ее:

RќRoS ‡ RμRіRѕ (PI RїR "P ° RЅRμ RїSЂRoRЅSЏS,S <C ... SЂRμS € RμRЅRoR№ RїRѕ RїRμRЅSЃRoRѕRЅRЅRѕR№ SЂRμS" RѕSЂRјRμ) S,SЂRѕRіR S,SЊ RЅRμ ° F ± SѓRґSѓ. РќРѕ Р ± СѓРґСѓ СЂР ° Р · Р ± РёСЂР ° ться СЃ РІРѕР · СЂР ° стом дожития.

R '° RєR RєRѕRј RїR "P ° RЅRμ RѕRЅ SЃRѕR RoSЂR ° ± RμS,SЃSЏ SЂR · ° F ± RѕR SЂR ° S,SЊSЃSЏ SЃ RІRѕR · SЂR ° SЃS,RѕRј RґRѕR¶RoS,RoSЏ, RїRѕRєR RЅRμ SЃRѕRѕR ° C ± ‰ R ° RµС‚СЃСЏ.

In "R'RѕR · SЂR ° SЃS,RѕRј RґRѕR¶RoS,RoSЏV" SЌRєRѕRЅRѕRјRoSЃS,S <RЅR ° F · C <RІR ° SЋS, RІSЂRμRјSЏ SЃ RјRѕRјRμRЅS,R ° RІS <C ... RѕRґR RЅR ° ° RїRμRЅSЃRoSЋ RґRѕ SЃRјRμSЂS,Ro С ‡ еловекР°.

РЈ РњРёС € устинР° тР° кже РЫоиннтересовР° Р »РёСЃСЊ, готов Р» Рё РѕРЅ РІРСдежааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааааР°РРР † RёRё стрР° С‚РµРіРёС З РµСЃРєРё РІР ° Р¶РЅС ‹С ... РЅР ° С † РёРѕРЅР ° Р» СЊРЅС ‹С ... Р ° ктивов. ФР° РєС‚РёС З РµСЃРєРё СЂРµС З СЊ Р · Р ° С € Р »Р ° Рѕ РЅР ° С † РёРѕРЅР ° Р» РёР · Р ° С † РёРё. РџРѕ СЃР »РѕРІР ° Рј РћР ± СѓС ... РѕРІР °, РѕРїСѓР ± Р» РёРєРѕРІР ° РЅРЅС ‹Рј РІ его Telegram-РєР ° РЅР ° Р» Рµ, РњРёС € СѓСЃСѕРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅРЅ СЏРІРёР ”, СЗ С‚Рѕ РІС‹ ступР° РµС ‚вротив РЅР ° С † РёРѕРЅР ° Р» РёР · Р ° С † РёРё.

P '· Pd SЃRІSЏR SЃ S,R ° RєRoRјRo RѕS,RІRμS,R ° RјRo RњRoS € SѓSЃS,RoRЅR °, C "SЂR ° RєS † RoSЏ RљRџR R¤ PI P" RѕSЃRґSѓRјRμ SЂRμS € Röhr "P ° RїSЂRo RіRѕR" RѕSЃRѕRІR ° РЅРёРё РІРѕ его РєР ° РЅРґРёРґР ° туре единоглР° СЃРЅРѕ РІРѕР · держР° ться.
201 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +46
    16 January 2020 12: 37
    And why only abstain? WEAKLY VOTE AGAINST? !!!
    1. +34
      16 January 2020 12: 41
      Quote: Fierce73
      WEAKLY VOTE AGAINST? !!!

      it's the same as against the wind .... they are the same at the trough ..... like everything edro!
      we’ll see how much it will really be against Mishutin .... I put a viskar for 25 years of endurance, which is a maximum of 2-4 people ..... the rest, like a flock of ZA and the Communist Party, will abstain (90%) !!
      1. -6
        16 January 2020 13: 18
        Quote: Tiksi-3
        we’ll see how much it will really be against Mishutin .... I put a viskar for 25 years of endurance, which is a maximum of 2-4 people ..... the rest, like a flock of ZA and the Communist Party, will abstain (90%) !!

        Unanimously!
        The Communist Party is still that woman of easy virtue! laughing
        Especially the United States, they liked to wave, and now they are raging tongue
        1. +22
          16 January 2020 14: 30
          I agree.
          P '· Pd SЃRІSЏR SЃ S,R ° RєRoRјRo RѕS,RІRμS,R ° RјRo RњRoS € SѓSЃS,RoRЅR °, C "SЂR ° RєS † RoSЏ RљRџR R¤ PI P" RѕSЃRґSѓRјRμ SЂRμS € Röhr "P ° RїSЂRo RіRѕR" RѕSЃRѕRІR ° РЅРёРё РІРѕ его РєР ° РЅРґРёРґР ° туре единоглР° СЃРЅРѕ РІРѕР · держР° ться.
          Why not vote against? The gut is thin? Papa Zyu, as always, wants to look good in front of the electorate and so that they do not tear him from the feeder, he has a weather vane and lousy skin. He took and debunked such an idea.
          1. +4
            16 January 2020 14: 40
            Quote: Alexander Suvorov
            He took and cited such an idea

            They are still in the restructuring of everything under the Americans, they all worry about the people for the people!
            But they did not forget the ideology! The electorate, you see, is gullible, all the same, the ideas of communism are being pursued!
            And this is not what kind of electorate and here in VO, he is very aggressive wink And yesterday, all of them rooster pecked somewhere, as they broke off the chain.
      2. +24
        16 January 2020 13: 23
        In general, of course, it’s funny and sad to watch our politicians. LDPR proposed a bill to abolish personal income tax for the poor. Mishustin said against. The Liberal Democratic Party, through the words of the leader, announced: a wonderful prime minister will be, we are for him. Weather vane.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +27
        16 January 2020 13: 41
        Mishustin will not review pension reform

        There is no need to hope for changes, Mishutin will pursue the same policy as Medvedev .. what they say, he will do .. Perhaps, of course, the work will be more responsible and clearer, but the result for ordinary citizens will be definitely the same as now ... It is necessary to change everyone, everyone in general, including the "elite", whose income schemes have been perfected and put on stream .. No Mishutin will dare to encroach on this stream. We need socialism!
        1. +12
          16 January 2020 14: 20
          Quote: Svarog
          You should not hope for changes, Mishutin will pursue the same policy as Medvedev ... whatever they say, he will do it.

          Who orders music, he dances the girl! Not for this he was put forward so that he immediately spit against the wind!
        2. +5
          16 January 2020 15: 08
          Quote: Svarog
          Mishutin will pursue the same policy as Medvedev .. whatever they say, he will do it.

          You have some misconception about the government: as a "legislative-political" authority, and not an EXECUTIVE one!
          Did you by chance confuse him with the State Council, Duma, President, talking about "conducting politics" !?
          The executive (!) Power (represented by the government of the Russian Federation) must do what the political power indicates to it! (within the framework of the current legislation of course) Or do you think the process of government is different?
          But.
    2. +9
      16 January 2020 12: 48
      It is impossible !!! Expelled from the deputies! Yes, even a criminal case will be instituted, for everyone, there is a reason!
      1. +2
        16 January 2020 14: 36
        Repost.
        Estimate the corresponding beard to Medvedev's face - pure Nicholas II ...
        And now put on Mishustin glasses with a gleam in a thin frame - spilled Lavrenty Beria!
        Do you say physiognomy is pseudoscience? Oh well...
        1. +10
          16 January 2020 14: 48
          Quote: vladimirvn
          And now put on Mishustin glasses with a gleam in a thin frame - spilled Lavrenty Beria!

          And I have other associations ....
        2. +2
          16 January 2020 22: 46
          And if you try on a pile ...?
    3. +5
      16 January 2020 12: 51
      whoever doubted, otherwise they would have taken him here.
      1. +24
        16 January 2020 13: 11
        Quote: Bar2
        whoever doubted, otherwise they would have taken him here.

        Please note that in modern Russia, at the helm of companies in high government positions, they are not put in place specialists, but effective managers, without shame and conscience, who are bobbing their heads and do not care about the people around them. And it did not start yesterday, and Serdyukov from the Moscow Region. as an example. So calm down, breathe evenly, from the change of terms the sum of the numbers is not changed. Remove the noodles gentlemen.))))) Something he reminded me of Chubais, here is an excerpt from an article about him.))))
        Being well acquainted with the current situation of business in the country and the existing corruption, Mikhail Mishustin again plunged into work with high technologies and electronic services aimed at automating activities, which made transparent the entire tax system of the country
        In general, I'm afraid we were led again, the Bear was changed to Mishutka)))))
        1. -1
          16 January 2020 13: 50
          in fact, this person from the Federal Tax Service made, for example, the Norwegian chapter of the tax, the most advanced and most digitalized service in the world. it's worth something. I don’t know much about him, but what has been done from the tax since 10 years is visible from any angle and to deny that under his leadership everything has changed stupidly.
          1. +12
            16 January 2020 14: 05
            Quote: carstorm 11
            but what has been done from the tax since 10 years is visible from any angle and to deny that under his leadership everything changed stupidly.

            That's when we pay the tax on air, sun and rain, then we'll talk about its positive Know How in the tax policy of the new Russia))))
            1. -2
              16 January 2020 14: 08
              and what does the Federal Tax Service have to do with it? they do not accept and do not create taxes. as if the State Duma adopts the tax code. you are not sending these questions at all.
              1. +7
                16 January 2020 14: 14
                They are the ones who adopt taxes, but the laws and laws are consulted with the head of the Federal Tax Service before they are adopted, and now God himself ordered, the chairman of the government)))) Not a plowed field for activity. Are you familiar with the biography of Mishustin? After all, he is far from being an economist by his first education, only in the 10th year he successfully received the "necessary" education. And before that, so to speak, I was sitting on the bench, stretching my elbows, I think so. In general, I will not guess, time will tell who Mr. Mishutin is. Nobody from this company has faith.
                1. 0
                  16 January 2020 14: 41
                  In Russia, there really is no plowed field for collecting taxes - 13 million work in the shade with 20 trillion turnover - they do not pay taxes: pensions, benefits, free medicine and much more.
                  1. +1
                    16 January 2020 14: 56
                    Quote: Vadim237
                    13 million work in the shade with 20 trillion turnover - do not pay taxes

                    Well, let's see what the academic adviser of the HSE Gaidar. Moreover, he is positioned in all media as an awesome finance specialist.
                    Thanks to his position, Mishustin is one of the most informed officials, especially in terms of cash flows, including shadow ones. Moreover, over many years of work in one of the most influential, he was not involved in corruption scandals.
                    We will watch, and not throw at the fan.)))) Time will tell.
                  2. +10
                    16 January 2020 15: 33
                    Quote: Vadim237
                    13 million work in the shade with 20 trillion turnover

                    Pull them out of the shadows - kill a small business and these 13 mil. will be on the street .. After all, those who are in the shade are usually small businesses. It is necessary to introduce a progressive tax. Prohibit the withdrawal of capital in offshore. To establish a state monopoly on the extraction of natural resources, alcohol .. That's when pensions will be and the economy will begin to develop. Because you don’t need to produce a lot of mind to develop natural resources and especially alcohol, but you need a mind in industry, medicine, pharmacology .. and other sectors where there is a high added value .. But for some reason, our billionaire oligarchs are in no hurry to invest money there .. why? why do they need it ... him and so well.
                    do not pay taxes a: pensions, benefits, free medicine and much more.

                    When was the last time you were in the hospital? We don’t have free medicine .. All that can be done for free, go to the therapist .. But the result will be the same if you diagnose yourself by rummaging on the Internet .. Personally, I checked .. And then, if to narrow specialists, then six months turn or go to pay ..
                    1. -2
                      16 January 2020 16: 28
                      From the monopolization of alcohol, the maximum that the budget will receive is 20 billion rubles, oil and gas production, and so for the most part state. We’ll get these 13 million out of the shadows and get 3 or more trillions of rubles in the budget - you can don’t worry about taxes, they won’t be thrown into the street, since these guys have been working for more than a year.
                      1. +2
                        16 January 2020 16: 46
                        Quote: Vadim237
                        From the monopolization of alcohol, the maximum that the budget will receive is 20 billion

                        Ha .. you take figures from the ceiling .. only in 2018, excise taxes were collected 167,4 billion rubles .. This is only excise duty and only vodka .. Estimates are different, but the monopolization of alcohol will give from 4 to 8 trillion .. per year ..
                        https://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/21614.pdf
                        Pull these 13 million from the shadows and get 3 or more trillions of rubles in the budget

                        Think why not pulled yet? once again, small business will kill it .. Are you a businessman yourself?
                      2. -1
                        16 January 2020 20: 01
                        No 20 billion is additional - but yours from 4 to 8 trillion are pure fantasy, since we do not even produce a trillion alcohol. What makes you think that 13 million is an exclusively small business - the average is full of the same.
                    2. 0
                      16 January 2020 16: 40
                      Well, you swung alcohol! So the whole electorate will turn away! This tagged indulged, and burned.
                    3. -4
                      16 January 2020 17: 14
                      Svarog, tax evasion is an unworthy act from the point of view of morality, and by law it is a crime. Excuse me?
                      You will know: the production of alcohol and the extraction of natural resources have very little effect on the joint pension system, but the non-payment of pension contributions by those working in the shade directly affects it. Realize, but it’s awkward to read ....
                      1. 0
                        17 January 2020 16: 41
                        Quote: Victor N
                        tax evasion is an unworthy act from the point of view of morality, and by law it is a crime. Excuse me?

                        And the use of taxes paid for the construction of fabulous palaces and the payment of no less fabulous salaries and bonuses - is it both in terms of morality and law ?! Excuse me?
                        Quote: Victor N
                        Realize, but it’s awkward to read ....
          2. +9
            16 January 2020 14: 31
            Quote: carstorm 11
            this man from the Federal Tax Service made, for example, the Norwegian head of tax, the most advanced and most digitalized service in the world

            felt on the wallet and will feel more than once
            1. +1
              16 January 2020 14: 35
              damn ... claims to the State Duma are all and not to the Federal Tax Service. I spoke only about the fact that the Federal Tax Service has changed dramatically under his leadership. and in fact it has become a very advanced and convenient service. but what exactly they collect is a completely different question for other people
              1. 0
                16 January 2020 16: 49
                I, so as not to spit on me, I will not write much. Just to list. Sberbank, tax, growing registry. Who has been there ten years ago will feel the difference. Now visiting them and solving problems takes a maximum of half an hour. And in one window. And then you can run for a week. For all floors and buildings.
                True, this has nothing to do with the topic of our debate. Not the chief of the FNS put forward this idea. And Gref began.
          3. AUL
            +6
            16 January 2020 15: 01
            Quote: carstorm 11
            in fact, this person from the Federal Tax Service made, for example, the Norwegian chapter of the tax, the most advanced and most digitalized service in the world.

            And why then this most advanced and so on service could not collect taxes on a progressive scale? After all, that’s how they explain the refusal to introduce this scale!
            1. +8
              16 January 2020 15: 07
              And why then this most advanced and so on service could not collect taxes on a progressive scale? After all, that’s how they explain the refusal to introduce this scale!

              He would then, instead of a new "chair", have moved to the bunk.
              1. -2
                16 January 2020 17: 35
                Even AUL with Lexus will not be able until tax nihilism among the people is outlived. Or, at least, in yourself.
                1. +10
                  16 January 2020 17: 45
                  while tax nihilism among the people we will not outlive

                  People are constantly ripped off without asking. Soon there will be nothing to "cut". But "rich Buratina" only multiply and grow fat. Or not?
                  Or at least in yourself

                  I have no arrears of taxes and fees. Like foreign citizenship. What I can’t put as an example any of the big officials and oligarchs.
                  1. -2
                    16 January 2020 20: 05
                    Our people, first of all, the people themselves in the form of numerous speculators strip off.
            2. -2
              16 January 2020 15: 08
              will accept new taxes will collect. or do you want them to take taxes themselves and collect them themselves?)))
              1. AUL
                +4
                16 January 2020 15: 12
                Quote: carstorm 11
                or do you want them to take taxes themselves and collect them themselves?)))

                Please read my post again, only slowly. Then, perhaps, you will understand that I did not write about this at all. And please do not ascribe your fantasies to me!
                1. -1
                  16 January 2020 15: 15
                  And why then this most advanced and so on service could not collect taxes on a progressive scale?
                  what fantasies?) you asked why I answered because they do not have such a law by which they should do this.
                  1. AUL
                    +2
                    16 January 2020 15: 28
                    Quote: carstorm 11
                    what fantasies?) you asked why I answered because they do not have such a law by which they should do this.

                    Read the third time, even more slowly and completely. The meaning of the second sentence.
                    1. -1
                      16 January 2020 15: 34
                      write more specifically because I have no idea what and who explains the rejection of this scale. I was not interested in this question and the meaning of the question eludes me
                      1. AUL
                        +3
                        16 January 2020 15: 36
                        Quote: carstorm 11
                        I have no idea what and who is explaining the rejection of this scale. I was not interested in this question and the meaning of the question eludes me

                        Science is powerless here ...
                      2. 0
                        16 January 2020 15: 38
                        I think so . It’s worth finishing, and it reminds one of a conversation between the deaf and the blind.
            3. +1
              16 January 2020 16: 51
              This is to the State Duma. Taxes are the prerogative of the legislature. FNS is a tax collector. Only collect.
              1. AUL
                -1
                16 January 2020 17: 01
                Quote: T.Henks
                This is to the State Duma. Taxes are the prerogative of the legislature. FNS is a tax collector. Only collect.
                Repeat the same dialogue with you as with carstorm 11? No I do not want!
            4. 0
              25 January 2020 11: 49
              After all, that’s how they explain the refusal to introduce this scale.
              !
              If it's not difficult for you, take a look at how the "refusal" is explained?
        2. 0
          16 January 2020 18: 18
          in high government positions, they put in not effective specialists, but effective managers

          In this context, the word "effective" is asked in quotation marks. Well, or the letter "d" at the beginning means.
    4. +1
      16 January 2020 12: 55
      But in fact, if he canceled the pension reform and showed himself well, he could have jumped into the presidential chair in the election
      1. +18
        16 January 2020 13: 07
        Quote: Clever man
        But in fact, if he canceled the pension reform and showed himself well, he could have jumped into the presidential chair in the election

        hi Is this sarcasm or your naive idea of ​​the "Kremlin mafia"?
        "The Moor has done his job, the Moor can leave," but the "Dimon" will not "go far", they do not leave such a trough.
        Aliens do not go there! hi
        1. +2
          16 January 2020 14: 50
          Hello. I am the daughter of a deputy. Not everything is so simple, Vyacheslav, as you write here. VYFSEVRETE - "Dimon" is not a Moor - I saw him on TV. laughing
      2. +1
        16 January 2020 13: 54
        As soon as such thoughts come to his bald head (and they certainly won’t come), he will not jump into the president’s chair, but into the Mordovian zone, for 20 years.
        Best case scenario.
      3. +7
        16 January 2020 13: 57
        Quote: Clever man
        But in fact, if he canceled the pension reform and showed himself well, he could have jumped into the presidential chair in the election
        No, well, it would be strange to hope that Mishustin will first of all deal with the issue of canceling the pension reform. Nobody will touch this "dessert" ahead of time. If this happens, it will not be earlier than 2024, when the country approaches the presidential elections.
        1. +1
          16 January 2020 14: 06
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          If this happens, it will not happen before 2024, when the country approaches the presidential election.

          In principle, they can make plans for the parliamentary elections. Presidential lose their meaning.
          The possibility of an early retirement, but with a living wage of a pensioner, can add to the pension reform.
          1. +4
            16 January 2020 14: 11
            Quote: Sergey39
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            If this happens, it will not happen before 2024, when the country approaches the presidential election.

            In principle, they can make plans for the parliamentary elections. Presidential lose their meaning.
            The possibility of an early retirement, but with a living wage of a pensioner, can add to the pension reform.

            Quite possible. But for any reason this card will be played for some significant stage, either in 2021 or in 2024. Now Mishustin, even with the goal of raising his rating, will not pedal this topic at all.
        2. +5
          16 January 2020 14: 32
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          when the country approaches the presidential election.

          there will be no elections or the president will be decorative, such as Sobchak
          1. +6
            16 January 2020 14: 44
            Quote: Silvestr
            Quote: Nyrobsky
            when the country approaches the presidential election.

            there will be no elections or the president will be decorative, such as Sobchak

            No Sylvester, there will be elections and candidates. But only everything will be furnished in such a way that they will not leave any other choice, i.e. will nominate one more or less "smart" and, in contrast to him, they will register competitors that you cannot look at without tears (such as Sobchak). In this situation, people will choose "smart". hi
            1. +6
              16 January 2020 14: 52
              Quote: Nyrobsky
              In this situation, people will choose "smart"

              I am convinced that the president will be decorative, like Dodon in Moldova or in Germany. The controls will be in old hands hi
              1. 0
                16 January 2020 17: 39
                Putin said that Russia should remain a strong presidential republic.
      4. +4
        16 January 2020 14: 38
        Quote: Clever man
        if he canceled pension reform and showed himself well, he could jump into the presidency in the elections

        Yes, he can jump into the president’s chair anyway. Our president is not elected for business. Whom Putin will point to with his finger and choose. Yes, even if again Dimona!

        But I think Mishustin did not run for president, as did Dimona (he performed his function of preserving the seat). On the role of the leader of the nation, as both of them do not pull. Leadership is not enough, they are increasingly fulfilling the will of others.
    5. +14
      16 January 2020 12: 56
      Quote: Fierce73
      WEAKLY VOTE AGAINST? !!!

      they didn’t set him up to change something, not in favor of the bourgeoisie and the authorities
      1. +12
        16 January 2020 13: 03
        Who would doubt it. The president indicated that on average we now live up to 73 years. But this is doubtful.
      2. +2
        16 January 2020 13: 14
        В В Putin has long begun talking about the upcoming digital economy. At first, he only mentioned it
        Over the years, more and more revealed the essence.
        Here is the premier for the digital economy of the Russian Federation. Probably. this served as the main one in the choice of the prime minister. He introduced the figure and the tax service.
        But he himself says: "
        "" "According to a TASS source who was at the United Russia meeting, and also judging by the video recording of the meeting, which Kashevarova posted, Mishustin named among his priorities

        digitalization of the economy and the transformation of the state into a “digital platform”,
        reliance on nat projects,
        institutional reforms
        removal of restrictions for business,
        changes in the composition of the new cabinet. "
        1. +8
          16 January 2020 13: 22
          Quote: To be or not to be
          Mishustin called

          digitalization of the economy and the transformation of the state into a “digital platform”,

          Even if you number, you don't even get it ... well, the remnants of the Soviet "analog" footprint won't fit into "digital" ..
          1. +3
            16 January 2020 13: 26
            Here the question is different. There is no change in settings and basis. Everything remains the same.
            Russia just needs to catch the global train of the digital economy.
            Who does not have time for that. bananas ...
        2. -1
          16 January 2020 13: 25
          Quote: To be or not to be
          In Putin has long begun talking about the upcoming digital economy

          The digital economy program was approved back in 2017 and then the money went to this project! But with us this is not interesting for anyone!
          I wonder only who farted around the corner?
          1. AUL
            +1
            16 January 2020 15: 58
            Quote: Edik
            The digital economy program was approved back in 2017 and then the money went to this project! But with us this is not interesting for anyone!

            This program was obviously doomed to failure! With a transparent, digital economy, it would be difficult to steal budget money on a current scale, so the introduction of this program causes fierce resistance at all levels of government. Those who are older probably remember the boom in the introduction of ACS (automated enterprise management systems) in the 70s, which failed for the same reason (although they stole then, not by an example less).
            Well, money has been going on since 2017. Just where?
            1. +2
              16 January 2020 17: 51
              Quote from AUL
              Well, money has been going on since 2017. Just where?

              The program that is being promoted, it is on the network where everything is written in terms and actions! I understand that this is not visible from your sofa, but I could help with what hi
    6. +15
      16 January 2020 12: 59
      from a change in terms of terms .. the amount does not change. and who will let him do it ..
    7. +2
      16 January 2020 13: 00
      Sykotno, can fly back.
      1. +11
        16 January 2020 13: 11
        RќRoS ‡ RμRіRѕ (PI RїR "P ° RЅRμ RїSЂRoRЅSЏS,S <C ... SЂRμS € RμRЅRoR№ RїRѕ RїRμRЅSЃRoRѕRЅRЅRѕR№ SЂRμS" RѕSЂRјRμ) S,SЂRѕRіR S,SЊ RЅRμ ° F ± SѓRґSѓ. РќРѕ Р ± СѓРґСѓ СЂР ° Р · Р ± РёСЂР ° ться СЃ РІРѕР · СЂР ° стом дожития.

        Well, all ambitious to pensioners, colleagues, probably, will poison them (pensioners) so that they don't get confused under the feet of reformers and worsen "financial reporting" and "macroeconomic indicators." sad This is the "new prime minister"! "Right off the bat!" I alone have a feeling that in the words of the subject, Kudrin said (well, or vice versa, the subject in the words of Kudrin)?
        1. -7
          16 January 2020 13: 28
          Quote: Snail N9
          Well, all ambitious to pensioners, colleagues, probably, will poison them (pensioners) so that they don't get confused under the feet of reformers and worsen "financial reporting" and "macroeconomic indicators."

          First of all, well, are you aware of what would be with you for those jokes about power that you are scribbling with a machine gun here, under the Communists?
        2. +6
          16 January 2020 13: 35
          Well, an all-ambitian retired colleague
          Yeah words
          ... But I will deal with the age of survival
          optimism is not added.
          I have one, it feels like Kabrin said the words of the subject (well, or vice versa, the subject said Kudrin)?
          I think you have the right feeling, this is Kudrinsky creature.
    8. +8
      16 January 2020 13: 12
      Vedmedev 2, in its “content” but in a “new package”! Such a country does not need a prime minister! Enough of the incompetent iPhone! Nominate for a popular vote, after the voiceover of his program to bring the country out of the economic crisis!
      1. -5
        16 January 2020 14: 46
        The main task of the new minister now is the implementation of all May decrees for the program until 2024 with the elimination of all stalled axles.
    9. Maz
      0
      16 January 2020 15: 42
      Chernomyrdin reminds
    10. 0
      17 January 2020 10: 20
      So, after all, Mishustin and his wife are millionaires and have about 100 million. Will he do anything against himself and his condition? against the former government? against all deputies in a thought? against the poor president?
    11. 0
      17 January 2020 12: 54
      It’s annoying, and suddenly it burns laughing
  2. +12
    16 January 2020 12: 37
    What did they expect? Naturally, he will support the policy of the current government, otherwise he would not have been elected.
    1. +6
      16 January 2020 12: 51
      So again they will raise the retirement age ... They do not want to pay pensions, they want everyone to die before it is paid! Cancel the pipe dream!
      1. +5
        16 January 2020 13: 08
        Quote: Anatoly 288
        So again they will raise the retirement age ...

        Rather yes than no.
    2. +8
      16 January 2020 13: 22
      % of pensioners in society should be reduced. Here the opinions of the good king and bad boyars coincide.
    3. -6
      16 January 2020 13: 22
      It's too early to reach a verdict. Let's look at the personalities of the new government. Will all Siluanovs, etc., survive there?
    4. +1
      16 January 2020 13: 28
      The task of the transitional government is to carry out the constitutional reform, while others will do the "breakthrough".
  3. +5
    16 January 2020 12: 38
    The same Medvedev, only in profile.
    1. +5
      16 January 2020 13: 00
      They just exchanged Medvedev for Misha Shustrin.
  4. +8
    16 January 2020 12: 38
    And someone believed in a miracle? It is high time to grow up from childhood, and understand that Santa Claus does not exist.
    1. +2
      16 January 2020 12: 42
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      It is high time to grow up from childhood, and understand that Santa Claus does not exist.

      Unlike another creature associated with winter and snow. I mean the fox. And he will come laughing
    2. -1
      16 January 2020 12: 59
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      It's time to grow up from childhood, and understand that Santa Claus does not exist

      If Santa Claus even exists, then he does not bring gifts.
  5. +8
    16 January 2020 12: 39
    deal with the age of survival
    All pensioners live up to 100 years! That's an order !
    1. +5
      16 January 2020 12: 50
      Do not!!!!! Are you !!!! ???? They will raise the age to 99 years!
      1. +4
        16 January 2020 12: 54
        Quote: Dmitry Potapov
        Do not!!!!!

        This is not for me! This new prime minister will adjust the "age of survival"! By decree! So do not die until a hundred years old! And that's it!
        1. +8
          16 January 2020 13: 12
          he cannot collect taxes, if progressive, wimp, in a word
          1. +2
            16 January 2020 15: 38
            Quote: novel xnumx
            he cannot collect taxes, if progressive, wimp, in a word

            Roma hi You seem wrong!
            1. Tax collection increased to 75% of the base! 25% - in the shade ...
            2. The law on progressive tax sabotages the Duma, led by edrosistov. Therefore, what matters to the executive branch?
            3. Therefore, his GDP was put forward for the post of Prime Minister because MihMish still has a Faberge, unlike a plush one.
            4. Putin would not put a "weakling" on the implementation of the tasks outlined in his message to the Federal Assembly by definition.
            5. Judging by the previous tasks performed, MihMish will also cope with this: there is money, there is support for the President, the governor’s corps will be rewritten at its discretion ...
            And things will move in the right direction. It seems to me so!
            1. +2
              16 January 2020 17: 00
              I would only be glad
  6. +7
    16 January 2020 12: 39
    Mishustin will not review pension reform
    she rushed through the bumps ... Mishustin, not from another planet, he was on the board, and everything that was done with a wave of Putin’s hand, he won’t change anything, they didn’t put him for that.
    1. +5
      16 January 2020 12: 58
      Quote: Aerodrome
      Mishustin, not from another planet, he is his own in the board

      plays hockey, makes friends with security officials, how else?
      1. +4
        16 January 2020 13: 16
        The second "Zolotov" .... Yes
  7. +4
    16 January 2020 12: 39
    P '· Pd SЃRІSЏR SЃ S,R ° RєRoRјRo RѕS,RІRμS,R ° RјRo RњRoS € SѓSЃS,RoRЅR °, C "SЂR ° RєS † RoSЏ RљRџR R¤ PI P" RѕSЃRґSѓRјRμ SЂRμS € Röhr "P ° RїSЂRo RіRѕR" RѕSЃRѕRІR ° РЅРёРё РІРѕ его РєР ° РЅРґРёРґР ° туре единоглР° СЃРЅРѕ РІРѕР · держР° ться.

    This is the point, to have time to establish a new government with the current composition of the Duma, where United Russia has a majority. Who knows what the composition of the new Duma will be. And the decision of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will in no way affect the approval of the ministers.
    1. +5
      16 January 2020 12: 44
      This is a very unusual majority, if it does not object to the resignation of its government and will vote for a foreign government that is not related to United Russia.
      Usually the parliamentary majority has a strictly opposite position. smile
    2. 0
      16 January 2020 12: 57
      Quote: Resident of the Urals
      And the decision of the Communist Party does not affect the approval of ministers

      Moreover, the Communist Party is not opposed, but simply to abstain.
      1. +6
        16 January 2020 13: 09
        Quote: tihonmarine
        Quote: Resident of the Urals
        And the decision of the Communist Party does not affect the approval of ministers

        Moreover, the Communist Party is not opposed, but simply to abstain.

        Communist Party in the "cage" of tame opposition parties, do not forget.
        1. 0
          16 January 2020 13: 24
          Quote: Aerodrome
          Communist Party in the "cage" of tame opposition parties, do not forget.

          Without a doubt.
  8. +1
    16 January 2020 12: 42
    Who would doubt that...
  9. +11
    16 January 2020 12: 42
    Mishustin unequivocally stated that he was opposed to nationalization. I will not touch anything (in terms of the decisions taken on pension reform), there will be no progressive tax.
    No miracle happened.
    Yes, no one was waiting. A miracle. From the change of places of the terms the sum does not change. The mountain gave birth to a mouse. We are following the previous course, comrades.
    1. +12
      16 January 2020 12: 47
      Quote: GKS 2111
      The amount does not change from a change in the terms of the terms.

      Sewed on soap!
    2. +8
      16 January 2020 12: 53
      Quote: GKS 2111
      Yes, no one expected. A miracle. From the change of places of the sums the sum does not change. The mountain gave birth to a mouse.

      "it's useless to move the beds" ..
      1. +4
        16 January 2020 13: 05
        Quote: Aerodrome
        "it's useless to move the beds" ..

        So there are no other girls either!
        1. +4
          16 January 2020 13: 06
          Quote: Phil77
          Quote: Aerodrome
          "it's useless to move the beds" ..

          So there are no other girls either!

          that’s the problem ... comrade Esposito.
          1. +4
            16 January 2020 13: 08
            Quote: Aerodrome
            that’s the problem ...

            Yeah! This is a problem we have with you. They have it?! Yes, not in this life and with this power.
            1. +3
              16 January 2020 13: 11
              Quote: Phil77
              Quote: Aerodrome
              that’s the problem ...

              Yeah! This is a problem we have with you. They have it?! Yes, not in this life and with this power.

              well ... fate .. "Russia cannot be understood with the mind ..." (C) you and I seem to have sinned quite a bit. drinks
              1. +2
                16 January 2020 13: 14
                Well ... depending on whom to compare! laughing drinks -no I am at work!
                1. +2
                  16 January 2020 13: 22
                  Quote: Phil77
                  -no I am at work!

                  symbolically ... me too at night. hi
              2. +1
                16 January 2020 13: 22
                you have sinned and half of the country is now steaming laughing
        2. +3
          16 January 2020 13: 13
          Quote: Phil77
          So there are no other girls either!

          There are women in Russian villages! stop
          1. +3
            16 January 2020 13: 16
            Ingvar! Ingvar! We are talking about girls! And beds in a brothel! / From a joke / laughing
            1. +5
              16 January 2020 13: 24
              I remember myself mentioning it the other day. But there is no problem with the girls, the problem is the reluctance to change them.
          2. +1
            16 January 2020 13: 24
            Quote: Ingvar 72
            Quote: Phil77
            So there are no other girls either!

            There are women in Russian villages! stop

            a poet in Russia is more than a poet ... good
    3. +10
      16 January 2020 12: 59
      Quote: GKS 2111
      Yes, no one was waiting

      like this!? Yesterday the "hurray-patriots" shouted about Putin's victory over the liberal government, and today it's a bummer. You can't do that!
    4. +6
      16 January 2020 13: 06
      We are going the same course, comrades.

      Yeah. The state is their own, and the people are their own.
      1. +5
        16 January 2020 13: 25
        Quote: Skay
        We are going the same course, comrades.

        Yeah. The state is their own, and the people are their own.

        if so, tear it .... it will be all ...... cold.
      2. +6
        16 January 2020 13: 29
        "The most important thing is to remove barriers for business, cut costs for business, in any case, it is essential to talk with business," Mishustin said on Thursday at a meeting with deputies of the United Russia faction in the State Duma.

        Understood, with "business will be SIGNIFICANT to speak" - how! straight jargon "in terms". You can imagine how they will "essentially" talk to business - I think they will hiccup for a long time after this conversation ..
        "Of course, the first thing that needs to be done is to seriously engage in institutional reforms, management reforms," ​​Mishustin believes. "Of course, [you need] to bring in the most modern information technologies." “I will deal with programs, the national project“ Digital Economy. ”“ Without a doubt, the state should be a digital platform that is created for people, ”he said.

        Well, what did I say yesterday? Welcome to the digital state - for people. wink It was for this subject that they were pulled from the deck.
        Taken from here: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/7532747?utm_source=finobzor.ru
        I say, we say "subject", we mean "Kudrin".
    5. -9
      16 January 2020 15: 04
      What are you going to privatize there - half of the shares of all large companies have long been privately owned by both internal and external investors, shares are sold and bought every day, do you want investors, and millions of them, take their investments by force? A progressive tax in Russia will primarily lead to an increase in the value of all goods and services, since the producers and speculators of which this tax affects will simply transfer this burden on buyers - they have every right, since they make goods and services and they push them to decide what prices expose.
  10. +5
    16 January 2020 12: 44
    Who would doubt it ... So for us - that one is a protege of the bourgeoisie, that the other - no difference. All will be one people to spread rot. From the change of places of the sums, the sum does not change. Only the return of Soviet power can drastically improve the life of the people.
  11. +12
    16 January 2020 12: 49
    Yesterday I wrote that everything will be clear with Mishustin very soon ...
    His position will be decisive: will there be a progressive tax or the entire burden of overcoming the crisis will fall only "on our shoulders." And he "did not disappoint", announcing today that there will be no progressive tax. Coupled with the fact that there will also be no revision of the results of "privatization" and softening of the pension reform, everything else becomes uninteresting.
    So, for me it makes no difference such a change of the prime minister from "plush" to "bald".
    1. +5
      16 January 2020 13: 10
      And he "did not disappoint"

      All. We disagree, there will be no kina. sad
    2. +4
      16 January 2020 14: 00
      Quote: mavrus
      Yesterday I wrote that everything will be clear with Mishustin very soon ...
      Determining will be his position:

      as they put it, it will stand.
  12. +8
    16 January 2020 12: 51
    How can I deal with the age of survival? Like a fairytale? Jumped into the boiler and boiled there? Will it be possible to replace the “jump” with monetary compensation?
    1. -1
      16 January 2020 12: 56
      Quote: sergo1914
      How can I deal with the age of survival?

      Can remove it sad
    2. +4
      16 January 2020 13: 00
      How can I deal with the age of survival?
      Very simple. Too many people have the audacity to survive even to their current retirement. We urgently need to deal with this ..
      1. +5
        16 January 2020 13: 07
        Quote: paul3390
        How can I deal with the age of survival?
        Very simple. Too many people have the audacity to survive even to their current retirement. We urgently need to deal with this ..


        Do you know something? Do not languish. Guillotine? Gazenvagen?
        1. 0
          16 January 2020 14: 33
          Efremov Bull hour read? After 60 - come to the Palace of Tender Death. Particularly elected - no need .. Everything has already been described to us ..
    3. 0
      16 January 2020 13: 07
      Quote: sergo1914
      How can I deal with the age of survival?

      Maybe they live long after retirement?
    4. +3
      16 January 2020 14: 01
      Quote: sergo1914
      How can I deal with the age of survival? Like a fairytale? Jumped into the boiler and boiled there? Will it be possible to replace the “jump” with monetary compensation?

      no, "monetization" is not provided ... fuck you not money! wassat
  13. +4
    16 January 2020 12: 53
    In what plan is he going to deal with the age of survival ...

    Rosstat will simply increase it to 100 or to 150
  14. +1
    16 January 2020 12: 55
    Mikhail Mishustin unequivocally spoke about the pension reform, noting the question of its possible cancellation

    This was probably the main condition for his appointment as prime minister.
    1. +6
      16 January 2020 13: 01
      Quote: tihonmarine
      ... the main condition for his appointment as prime minister

      ... change nothing. Steam was released for the electorate, they shouted "hurray" excitedly and that's enough - the rating of Putin's people has grown
  15. 0
    16 January 2020 12: 57
    Not started fool
  16. +3
    16 January 2020 12: 57
    Yeah .. schaz, he also will fight with the oligarchs ..))

    It was interesting earlier to listen to some characters about how Putin rejoices day and night for the country and the people, and the evil Medvedev (well, the Medvedev clan to the heap) constantly puts sticks in his wheels, and prevents him from lifting the country from his knees ..

    Apparently, now the task of inserting sticks into Putin’s wheels is shifted to Mishutin ??)
    1. 0
      16 January 2020 15: 57
      Quote: Roman070280
      Apparently, now the task of inserting sticks into Putin’s wheels is shifted to Mishutin ??)

      But never once guessed !!!
      The role of the collective scapegoat is now cunningly assigned to the country's parliament, which, according to the idea of ​​the guarantor, should appoint the Prime Minister and ministers! (You yourself appointed, and I suffer with them! - Uuuuu, BYAK!)
      1. -2
        16 January 2020 16: 02
        That is, Mishustina was appointed by the parliament, not Putin ??)
        1. +1
          16 January 2020 16: 06
          Quote: Roman070280
          That is, Mishustina was appointed by the parliament, not Putin

          But has the legislation already changed?
          I talked about how this will soon be.
          (Well, what don’t you guys understand?
          After all, beauty is only only externally pleasant.
          All cannot be beautiful in the world
          And for some reason, everyone needs happiness! laughing )
  17. +6
    16 January 2020 12: 58
    In the Kremlin Theater of the Absurd there was a change of scenery.
    The composition of the troupe remained the same. However, the director changed the performers of some of the main roles.
    The show goes on....
    1. +1
      16 January 2020 13: 03
      The owner of the brothel changed his pimp ..
      Naturally, in order to take care of the employees of the brothel ..))

      Now they (or rather, ours) have a better life ..
  18. +2
    16 January 2020 13: 00
    Yes, look at his face and on all our expectations of changes, you can put an end to, a fat big cross.
  19. +1
    16 January 2020 13: 00
    Well, the Communists, I am surprised you are toothless, you won’t achieve power, that is, you don’t care how things are going with pensions. And Mishustin’s answer on pensions clarified the situation, the bourgeoisie are not going to pay the workers, they only need us as cannon fodder to protect their assets from overseas raiders.
  20. +1
    16 January 2020 13: 01
    In the old rotten barrel, one clip with the same cartridges. A shot, and a new one is inserted in the place of the retired, exactly the same. Someone has already unearthed an unaccounted plot on Rublevka, the approximate cost of 600 million rubles. But I think that he is an honest hard worker and tossed this house and plot =)
    1. +1
      16 January 2020 13: 06
      The house and the plot is not a candy wrapper from kanffety .. if you tossed it - you just can’t throw it back ..))
      1. 0
        16 January 2020 15: 12
        Quote: Roman070280
        you just can’t throw it back ..))

        Well, yes ... in disgust, but have to use ... hi
  21. +3
    16 January 2020 13: 03
    Mr. Twister, former Minister, Mr. Twister Millionaire
  22. BAI
    +2
    16 January 2020 13: 06
    1.
    The current head of the Federal Tax Service of Russia has opposed the abolition of pension reform.

    But what else can he say if the reform was carried out by his immediate supervisor - Putin?
    2.
    Communist Party faction in the State Duma decided to abstain unanimously when voting on its candidacy.

    Is it weak to vote against? Putin is all right - "a lame duck".
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +1
    16 January 2020 13: 09
    Wow ... as soon as it starts to introduce TAXES, it’s not for nothing that they set the head of the Federal Tax Service, from its filing these taxes grow like mushrooms after rain ...
    1. 0
      16 January 2020 15: 14
      Quote: Popuas
      not for nothing that the head of the Federal Tax Service was delivered

      I remember that not so long ago there was already a tax officer ... I drove the army into such a unit ...
  25. +5
    16 January 2020 13: 12
    In general, we changed the horseradish to hell ...
  26. +6
    16 January 2020 13: 14
    Why this article? No seriously. It is clear that this disco was started to move the president to a new life position.
  27. -4
    16 January 2020 13: 15
    Now is not the time to revise anything. I agree with those observers who believe that Mishustin is a "technical prime minister" who was appointed to carry out a political maneuver (unless, of course, to assume political responsibility for the impending serious economic crisis - there was already one such "kinder surprise") ... This composition of the State Duma is quite manageable "from above".
  28. +2
    16 January 2020 13: 16
    Of course, he will not review, because the president is very pleased with the reform. The only reform that has succeeded in 20 years. And then partially.
  29. +4
    16 January 2020 13: 16
    Damned liberals appointed Mishustin!
  30. +4
    16 January 2020 13: 20
    Where does the expectation of a change come from? After all, those who appoint and really steer the country on horseback, so that there would be changes, it is not necessary to introduce amendments to the Constitution, but to change it entirely together with management and friends.
  31. +4
    16 January 2020 13: 24
    Quote: maden.usmanow
    Damned liberals appointed Mishustin!

    This has never happened and here again =)
  32. ZVS
    +14
    16 January 2020 13: 30
    Mishustin is Kiriyenko, 98th year. The Strategy 2020 program has failed miserably, so Putin got Medvedev out of harm's way by putting Mishustin in his place, from whom one cannot even ask. Yes, no one can, tk. all resigned. And now Putin can safely blame the former cabinet. Now they will come up with a new program, allocate money for it and use them to develop overseas property, foreign plantations and vineyards, etc.
    The play was performed according to all the rules of the genre! Stanislavsky would have put a five - and the development of the country was completely ruined, and the people were suddenly made happy by making "concessions" to him.
    Clowns, one word!
    1. -5
      16 January 2020 15: 14
      "The Strategy 2020 program has failed miserably." This became clear in the same 2008 when this program was announced - the global economic crisis hit and until recently no one remembered this program. The program remained a program due to the lack of funds and a favorable economic environment over the past 12 years for its implementation.
      1. ZVS
        +2
        16 January 2020 17: 54
        Means Medvedev and Putin are immeasurable! In reserve alone, more than 500 billion dollars! It’s just that nobody really needed this program — neither Putin nor Medvedev. They worked, as it turned out, knowing that they would not answer before the people. It was a PR built on their activity and nothing more. They knew that the people in Russia would not rise until the children died of hunger. In Russia, the economy is built on the basis of which are bribes and theft. It is not a secret that at each level the bureaucracy takes kickbacks of up to 50%. Therefore, there is tacit agreement with this state of affairs on the part of the authorities, since the main task of the authorities is to create a large class of strong owners in order to prevent a turn to socialism.
        And all this retired circus is needed only to create a kind of change in power. Another promise of a brighter future. I am absolutely sure that by the end of Putin’s term nothing will change. They will conjure investors again, and their state oligarchs will determine state programs so that they increase fat. Who brought Putin into power, he has been eating these years.
        1. -5
          16 January 2020 20: 15
          Forget these funds for a rainy day about 500 billion gold reserves - an analogue of 2008. And there will be no socialism in Russia because the people are greedy in their mentality. If the 2008 crisis did not happen and in 2014 the oil price collapse did not occur and the sanctions were not imposed, then "Strategy 2020" would have been implemented by at least 80%.
          And I have been fattening the same all these years since 2014 - since I am one of those who brought Putin to power, like millions of Russian citizens who voted for him in the presidential election.
  33. +4
    16 January 2020 13: 30
    Are you talking about?
    Not for this is the rotation of the watchers under the head of the Hasidic administration.
  34. +1
    16 January 2020 13: 33
    Quote: Anatole Klim
    Quote: GKS 2111
    The amount does not change from a change in the terms of the terms.

    Sewed on soap!

    In addition to faces on the TV, nothing will change. All this mess with the resignation of the government is to push the changes into the brochure, erroneously called the Constitution of the Russian Federation, without grease.
  35. +1
    16 January 2020 13: 35
    RќRoS ‡ RμRіRѕ (PI RїR "P ° RЅRμ RїSЂRoRЅSЏS,S <C ... SЂRμS € RμRЅRoR№ RїRѕ RїRμRЅSЃRoRѕRЅRЅRѕR№ SЂRμS" RѕSЂRјRμ) S,SЂRѕRіR S,SЊ RЅRμ ° F ± SѓRґSѓ. РќРѕ Р ± СѓРґСѓ СЂР ° Р · Р ± РёСЂР ° ться СЃ РІРѕР · СЂР ° стом дожития.
    But what is returning to its own circles on the pension front, not a program to raise the living standards of the peoples of Russia ??? Many working pensioners have just begun to truly live, and in the first place, they began to help children and grandchildren to survive more or less, and set aside their repairs and medicines than you do not increase the welfare of the people ??? This is all interconnected. Still, there is a lot of cunning in our rulers, it seems that everything is verbally for the people, but in fact it is not clear for which people all these attempts and appearances of concerns ....
  36. +2
    16 January 2020 13: 41
    Quote: SU
    Mishustin is Kiriyenko, 98th year. The Strategy 2020 program has failed miserably, so Putin got Medvedev out of harm's way by putting Mishustin in his place, from whom one cannot even ask. Yes, no one can, tk. all resigned. And now Putin can safely blame the former cabinet. Now they will come up with a new program, allocate money for it and use them to develop overseas property, foreign plantations and vineyards, etc.
    The play was performed according to all the rules of the genre! Stanislavsky would have put a five - and the development of the country was completely ruined, and the people were suddenly made happy by making "concessions" to him.
    Clowns, one word!

    The old circus has remained, new clowns are performing. This crocodile and Gref’s best friend of us will now squeeze two glasses of juice instead of one. Thief rotation went ... or, as the guarantor says, the social elevators worked. Does our people deserve such a government?
  37. Egg
    +3
    16 January 2020 13: 48
    Quote: Edik
    Well, do you know what would be with you for those jokes about power that you are scribbling with a machine gun, under the Communists?

    There wouldn’t be anything, do not fantasize. Have you seen enough liberal films do you understand ....
  38. +6
    16 January 2020 13: 52
    The dream of the state and the prime minister is healthy citizens who regularly pay taxes and die on the day of retirement
  39. +1
    16 January 2020 13: 55
    But the life of the population is simpler, more secure, predictable and more comfortable, apparently lacking in the hands of the leaders. What is not the law is to ban, to impose.
  40. +1
    16 January 2020 13: 58
    He did not surprise. Did anyone expect change ?!
  41. 0
    16 January 2020 13: 59
    Are you talking about?
    Not for this is the rotation of the watchers under the head of the Hasidic administration!
    Now, if they tried to touch "Chabad Lubavich", then yes, then we would all see the slender and indestructible ranks of champions of freedom of conscience and other elements of judaicus security, screaming and raging in all conceivable poses and broadcasts.
    And so ....., just screwed the nuts for the gentiles and said that there would be no reverse motion.
    And how else should gentlemen handle the slaves?
    It’s good that so far the age of surviving slaves has been determined.
    In the future, with the development of events according to the current scenario, most likely, as soon as the slave stops making profits in one way or another, he will be given (or sold? (Deduct when calculating)) a ​​"death pill" and sign an agreement with him that he must accept it no later than 3 months after dismissal, otherwise, fines, penalties ..., for relatives.
    That's just in the Netherlands now they’ll break everything in ....
  42. +5
    16 January 2020 14: 08
    In "R'RѕR · SЂR ° SЃS,RѕRј RґRѕR¶RoS,RoSЏV" SЌRєRѕRЅRѕRјRoSЃS,S <RЅR ° F · C <RІR ° SЋS, RІSЂRμRјSЏ SЃ RјRѕRјRμRЅS,R ° RІS <C ... RѕRґR RЅR ° ° RїRμRЅSЃRoSЋ RґRѕ SЃRјRμSЂS,Ro С ‡ еловекР°.
    In short, it is clear that we will retire as before, but we will live happily until the first pension. laughing
    1. -4
      16 January 2020 14: 25
      Quote: sabakina
      Economists call the "age of survival" the time from retirement to death

      Correctly Yes

      Accordingly, the overstatement of the age of survival (and it is now taking place) leads to a decrease in pensionwhich is paid to the pensioner.

      This is so, by the way.
  43. +5
    16 January 2020 14: 14
    Something I don’t remember in Soviet times, such a term is the age of survival .... rather, this expression is suitable for baptism with Buchenwald but not a great country ...
    1. +6
      16 January 2020 14: 23
      When I hear the phrase "the age of survival", for some reason I always remember the movie "Dead Season" ......
  44. AB
    +1
    16 January 2020 14: 18
    But I will deal with the age of survival.

    A man retired, the next day he was shot. And why this, since it does not pay taxes, the state does not need it. So I figured it out ...
  45. +3
    16 January 2020 14: 23
    and who would doubt the next talking head)))) GDP is the only and unique king of all Russia. Stagnation, pah stability will continue. All new bar stay at their own. From a rearrangement of terms, the sum does not change.
  46. 0
    16 January 2020 14: 27
    If someone does not know. , then he drove there: MihMish)
  47. -7
    16 January 2020 14: 33
    Nationalization will not do anything economically and Mishustin knows this very well.
  48. +10
    16 January 2020 14: 33
    Mishustin came to power from business. All you need to know about a person. For decent people, being in business is a brand of a scoundrel for life. What do you expect from him? Remove the noodles from your ears and continue your daily life. There will be no changes, we were raped again .. Thank you all
    1. 0
      18 January 2020 11: 40
      A successful businessman, however!
      He invested in a wife and a member and a voucher, and there and there he received a significant offspring!
      Tiny, however!
      Now he will invest in the Government something for himself.
      Fofku will not offend, of course!
      Tighten the belts and wait.
  49. +2
    16 January 2020 14: 42
    Quote: Edik
    Quote: Snail N9
    Well, all ambitious to pensioners, colleagues, probably, will poison them (pensioners) so that they don't get confused under the feet of reformers and worsen "financial reporting" and "macroeconomic indicators."

    First of all, well, are you aware of what would be with you for those jokes about power that you are scribbling with a machine gun here, under the Communists?

    The communists did not adopt such cannibalistic laws, therefore there would be no reason to "scribble those jokes" ... lol
  50. +6
    16 January 2020 14: 43
    This means that the mess in the country will continue, and after further privatization of state property, state revenues will decrease even more, which will lead Putin to the same place where Lukashenko came to, and if you don’t get away with retirement, you will have to move to Gorbachev ...
  51. +3
    16 January 2020 14: 44
    Quote: shark
    Mishustin came to power from business. All you need to know about a person. For decent people, being in business is a brand of a scoundrel for life. What do you expect from him? Remove the noodles from your ears and continue your daily life. There will be no changes, we were raped again .. Thank you all

    Yes good Respect! hi
  52. +1
    16 January 2020 14: 50
    The Pension Reform has given its flowers. This is not just a “minus” - it’s hitting real nails... into the lid. I don’t even know what “plus” it can be compared to in terms of module. Can you tell me? p.s. I know for the big “advantages”.
  53. +1
    16 January 2020 14: 51
    I wonder if he’s not afraid of ruining his karma with such statements?
  54. 0
    16 January 2020 15: 11
    We should not abstain, but vote against!
  55. +3
    16 January 2020 15: 11
    Well, we swapped the awl for soap! What will change if the main puppeteer is still the same?
  56. The comment was deleted.
  57. +3
    16 January 2020 15: 39
    Pension reform is the basic value of the Guarantor, he has already exchanged his conscience for it, so there is no need to touch it, especially for some Mishustin.
    And asking him such a question is simply stupid - it is beyond his competence. But the parliamentarians could have asked themselves this question more reasonably, since they are the ones who can change the law.
    Or is this reserve ballast for United Russia? Let's say they tensed the situation, and just before the elections they lowered the retirement age by a year - and the electorate rejoiced?
    There is a lot to learn from Trump: he strained the situation to the maximum, then blew it away a little - and everyone is happy: relieved!
    1. +1
      16 January 2020 16: 18
      United Russia is ballast itself.
  58. +1
    16 January 2020 15: 48
    Did anyone doubt it???
  59. 0
    16 January 2020 15: 56
    The logic of all these actions is banal and simple..
    PU has difficult elections on the horizon, with iPhone’s real rating of 3-5%, the reshuffle between President and Prime Minister and back may already take place, and Navalny (or some other devil) may slip through, so they have started another “multi-move”. But unfortunately, this does not affect the population in any way. As the country was under manual control, it will remain so, and positions will be appointed according to the degree of devotion and not competence :(
    1. -4
      16 January 2020 16: 37
      Loyalty, first of all, implies the fulfillment of assigned instructions in full, but since in the regions there are mostly idlers and hackers sitting in village, city and other municipalities, and the local residents do not care about any high-quality, quick implementation of government orders, there can be no talk of any kind of government. Problems need to be solved locally - using radical methods.
  60. 0
    16 January 2020 17: 31
    Horseradish radish is not sweeter.
  61. exo
    +1
    16 January 2020 18: 23
    "They're all puppets
    In dexterous and hard-working hands..."(c)
  62. +2
    16 January 2020 19: 25
    Why bother with the age of survival? It is necessary to legally oblige pensioners to cross the road only when the light is red. laughing
  63. +1
    17 January 2020 05: 20
    Mishustin will not review pension reform

    On this and finish ...
  64. +1
    17 January 2020 06: 15
    RќRoS ‡ RμRіRѕ (PI RїR "P ° RЅRμ RїSЂRoRЅSЏS,S <C ... SЂRμS € RμRЅRoR№ RїRѕ RїRμRЅSЃRoRѕRЅRЅRѕR№ SЂRμS" RѕSЂRјRμ) S,SЂRѕRіR S,SЊ RЅRμ ° F ± SѓRґSѓ. РќРѕ Р ± СѓРґСѓ СЂР ° Р · Р ± РёСЂР ° ться СЃ РІРѕР · СЂР ° стом дожития.
    According to Obukhov, published on his Telegram channel, Mishustin unequivocally stated that he opposes nationalization.

    and why is he better than Medvedev, in general, “the same eggs only on the side”
  65. +1
    17 January 2020 14: 20
    Just one phrase: “there is no one to charge an increased rate of income tax in Russia.” The whole answer: We don’t have rich people.... “On the pension reform now it’s better not to touch anything, it seems to me,” Mr. Mishustin said at a meeting with the Communist Party of the Russian Federation It's a no brainer who he is...
  66. +1
    17 January 2020 16: 20
    It is necessary to approve the start date for the tribunal of the instigators and implementers of the pension “reform”, which brazenly robbed millions of Russians.