Superjet had to interrupt flight due to technical problem

The Sukhoi Superjet 100, owned by Aeroflot and operating the Moscow-Stavropol flight on January 12, unexpectedly ran into a malfunction, which caused him to return to Sheremetyevo.

About it сообщает TASS news agency, citing a source in the emergency service.

During the flight, the crew noticed that there was no skin on the left engine, so he decided to return to the departure airport. Before landing, the aircraft had to circle for an hour and a half to work out fuel. The plane landed at Sheremetyevo Airport as usual.

At that time there were 55 passengers and six crew members on board. Fortunately, none of them were hurt.

The alleged cause of the incident was the negligence of one of the employees who poorly fastened the casing or forgot to do it at all. Therefore, it was thwarted by a strong stream of air during take-off.

In this situation, there are no complaints about the aircraft itself and its developers, although this does not always happen. It happens that the causes of incidents with "Superjets" are called the shortcomings of its design. Sometimes this is done in the interests of competitors, but in some cases such criticism is objective.

Comments

[Tartar]

she was ripped off by a strong stream of air

This is called free flow.

[Boomandroid]

Quote: TarTar

she was ripped off by a strong stream of air

This is called free flow.

Why are these terms to people who are far from this topic? This is written as news for the consumer .. The most important thing is clear to him .. And the author’s thought and his assumptions))

[Elena Zakharova]

Quote: BoomAndroid

Why are these terms for people

Anyone wants to show off erudition

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

Anyone wants to show off erudition

Every thing needs to be called correctly. Yes, indeed, many terms are incomprehensible to people. But for this there are explanations and clarifications.
Here you, Elena Nikolaevna, know how many wings have a Sukhoi Superjet 100? And why?
But for that you know what erudition is and why it shines.

[Elena Zakharova]

Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi

Here you, Elena Nikolaevna, know how many wings have a Sukhoi Superjet 100?

Funny question ??
What should I know there and why)))
Something burst out laughing))

All right.
I will ask you a similar question.

Do you, Obi Wan Kenobi (Sigismund Voldemarovich) know how many socks on the wing of the SU-27?
And why are they needed there?

[Obi-Wan Kenobi]

And I’ll add.
Here:

The alleged cause of the incident was the negligence of one of the employees who poorly fastened the casing or forgot to do it at all.

Most likely it was not "the casing of the casing that was fastened poorly," but the engine nacelle hood lid was not locked.

[smart ass]

I agree, do not know how to be clever do not handle

[Ros 56]

This is called idiocy.

[smart ass]

Superjet not released at AvtoVAZ?

[Angelo Provolone]

What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut. There are more than a dozen fixtures!

[Same lech]

What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut. There are more than a dozen fixtures!

What a level of insult ... What do you want the human factor ... I forgot to insert one letter per word or attachment and all ... the consequences are irreparable.

[kjhg]

Quote: Angelo Provolone

What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut

And if this casing was in the front of the fuselage and coming off, when taking off, hit the engine. It’s scary to think. Well, how so irresponsible you can relate to your work, on which the lives of many people may depend, I don’t understand

[sanya_sergant]

... scary to think ...

Do not hang labels so seriously. "It's scary to think ... what would have happened ... but if my grandmother had a Device ..."
Surely not everything is so critical, torn off and torn off. I sat down normally. Surely the same hatch in front of the engine is closed by the three so as not to mess up.
Do you agree that drunk driving is a criminal and a potential killer?
However, everyone’s beloved character Otto von Stirlitz is drunk in Berlin and this doesn’t stop him from being a good hero.

[Piramidon]

Quote: sanya_sergant

Surely the same hatch in front of the engine is closed by the three so as not to mess up.

As one of the "Murphy's laws" says - "If more than one person is responsible for a mistake in the work, the guilty ones will not be found."

[sanya_sergant]

A mechanic twists nuts
The technician is looking to spin in the right direction
PIC will then verify that everything is in place, everything is in order

[Kaw]

But it’s just that someone has poorly secured it now is not clear. Maybe the mounting of the part itself was unreliable? And blame will now be hanged on Vanya’s airport technician so that the plane does not discredit.

[Lord of the Sith]

Come on, finish the superjet already.

[Elena Zakharova]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

Come on, finish the superjet already.

Will not work.
The plane is good.

[Lord of the Sith]

What do you mean "will not work"? A priori, any technique has a reserve for the future.
Like childhood illnesses.

[NKT]

It happens....

[parma]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

Come on, finish the superjet already.

You missed the word "budget", and forgot the letter "a" .. The most accurate "Come on, finish the budget of the superjet"

[Lord of the Sith]

Just don’t have to la la la cut the budget.
The stakes on the new plane are too high to steal money pointlessly.

[parma]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

Just don’t have to la la la cut the budget.
The stakes on the new plane are too high to steal money pointlessly.

Any large project is big stakes ... The same "eastern" one, and even the country's leadership admitted that it was "senseless to steal money" ... Yes, and "cutting" is not always a direct theft, often it is just work for the sake of working with 0 result for a large salary;)

[Romka]

A little miscalculated, a little screwed up, a little overlooked ..... those who can plant in a corn field save. Who knows how "easy" it was for the pilots?

[Captain45]

Quote: Romka

A little miscalculated, a little screwed up, a little overlooked ..... those who can plant in a corn field save. Who knows how "easy" it was for the pilots?

To bring the change of technicians to the corn field .... And .... from the automatic machines ... in long bursts ... in front of another shift, so that it gets through .... Then all the bolts and screws will be tightly tightened. There is no other way, because, as Fishka's grandfather said, "the people are wasted" (c) "Eternal call" And Ivanov.

[balunn]

Quote: Lord of the Sith

Come on, finish the superjet already.

For me, as a passenger, the plane is very good. But in market conditions, they most likely will not finish it. Economically unprofitable.

[St Petrov]

Economically unprofitable.

the most successful model among competitors. It is economically unprofitable to buy airbuses and Boeing. 200 pieces.

And to gradually localize is good.

[balunn]

You explain this to the leaders of the airlines. And ask the question why they take Boeing and Airbuses, not ssj-100

[St Petrov]

If we compare the supplies of the SSJ100 only with the airplane models closest in terms of passenger capacity (CRJ900 - 88 seats, CRJ1000 - 100 seats, CS100 - 110 seats, E190 - 98 seats, E195 - 108 seats, Lineage 1000E - VIP version E190, ARJ - 105 passengers) , then the share of SSJ100 in 2017 will be 36%.

I mean, that it is in its segment that the most successful CSJ among competitors. Mitsubishi did not finish. And the money poured several times more, about the same for the Chinese

If you consider that the SSJ with chronic underfunding of the project - then Sukhoi is simply handsome

[St Petrov]

Embriere and Bombardier made projects based on previously developed and in-production machines.

Superjet costs rose from 1,8 to 2,5 billion. 190 production aircraft were produced.

The Chinese, having started simultaneously with the GSS, and having spent 8 billion, released a dozen and a half ARJ.

The Japanese started two years later, spent 4,5 billion and expect to start mass production in 2021 (but this is in question).

[Guillon]

Because there is no limit to greed! They want to eat honey, and even a spoon !!!
In Soviet times, in the first place was safety и reliability, and now the maximum profit!

[wchin]

Quote: Gillaton

In Soviet times, safety and reliability came first.

What nonsense. Civilian jet aircraft were not produced in the USSR at all. More precisely, what is called "civilian jet aircraft" all over the world. The USSR produced "Soviet civilian jet aircraft". These were strange products that nobody wanted in a free market.
So SSJ, this is the firstborn. And not all of it is lumpy, as a well-known saying goes.

[Elena Zakharova]

Quote: wchin

What nonsense. In the USSR, civilian jets were not produced at all.

But what about the IL-86 ???

[vfwfr]

Boeing and airbus can put even now "conditionally" .. ours have at most three on the stocks ... But this is not certain.
This superjet, born under Poghosyan ... The pipe, wings, landing gear are ours. the rest is imported. We wanted to reduce the time spent on spare parts. The import showed the essence, they may not give the competitors spare parts ... They decided to stir up their own at last, but then the heads of the airlines do not want to tempt fate, to believe the son or grandson of Ivan Ivanovich and Company that everything will be fine and profitable without hemorrhoids. In addition: Boeing and Airbus are certified for flights to the USA, EUROPE, ASIA, VOSTOK ... And the process is not fast, and planes are needed now. (As I see it. So I printed it. The reliability is not confirmed.)

[SSR]

Quote: balunn

For me, as a passenger, the plane is very good. But in market conditions, they most likely will not finish it.

Comrade, they have already started to "finish" him. There is a task to remove at least American components. The United States was able to impose a ban on the sale of the Superjet to Iran precisely because they have a voice and their products there seem to be slightly more than 10%.

[kupitman]

Boeing interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - nothing happens.
ssj interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - everything is bad, they can’t do anything, they can’t fly, they don’t want to do

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: kupitman

Boeing interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - nothing happens.
ssj interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - everything is bad

Just Boeing in the world flies a little more than SSJ-comrade. Therefore, such a reaction ...
The bad in our case is less than the good. In different Soviet times, the same case would be considered as sabotage, with all the ensuing conclusions. The author of the words correctly noted:

Quote: The same LYOKHA

What do you want the human factor ... I forgot to insert one letter per word or attachment and all ... the consequences are irreparable.

I don’t know who benefits economically that in civil and military aviation of the Russian Federation planes fall like sleepy flies or break down ...

[loki565]

It seems that the ground services are specifically trying to ditch the Superjet. Recently, there was a case that they forgot to remove the grounding cable and during the flight, with a crutch, hollowed through the hull turning it into a colander. It’s good that it did not get into the elevator and did not jam it.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: loki565

Recently, there was a case that they forgot to remove the grounding cable and, during portlet, crushed it with a crutch along the body, turning it into a colander.

Symbolic translation:
Life shot - "shot in life" ...

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: loki565

Recently there was a case ...

IMHO this is the case when the incident has a name.

Next is the work of the services appropriate to the occasion ... everything is already there. Routine, oddly enough.

I am not a journalist, so I will not post versions. My right, by the way

[Korg]

What a salary - such a job!

[Mountain shooter]

Normal plane. Abnormal sloppiness!

[Elena Zakharova]

Sheremetyevo is the most problematic airport in Russia.

[Rushnairfors]

And not only in Sheremetyevo business. There are many questions for tovarisch araflot, who does his best to make this plane fly as little as possible and "mow" as often as possible. As far as I know from the guys flying in this company, the state pays a lot of money for a simple fleet of superjets, I don't remember what the salt is, but in short: the planes are standing, money is piling up, everything is fine.
P.S. And so the guys who fly on ssj say that Samzel is very even at the level

[donavi49]

Aeroflot and any large company need only 2 types of aircraft - Watermelon and Boeing. All others are weights and unnecessary ballast.

Everything will also be with the MS-21.

It is not profitable for the company to have another 3 type / philosophy - which requires expenses for training, maintenance, taking into account various nuances, and at the same time the share of the park is ~ 10%, and the share of profit is even less.

[NKT]

And what about regional aircraft? Canadians buy or Brazilians?

[donavi49]

A220 is . Integrated in a network of watermelon. The best choice. The Brazilians have not yet integrated into the Boeing network, but the process is already underway. It will physically take some time.

As a result, A and B remained with the regionals.

[NKT]

A220 in a sense, a competitor to A318, do not you find?

[St Petrov]

a separate carrier will soon be created for the CSW.

[Thrifty]

Problems with the preparation of maintenance personnel, or the usual sloppiness? ??

[cherkas.oe]

[quote = Thrifty] or the usual slovenliness? ?? [/ qu Or maybe unusual. After all, if the car proves itself well, it will have priority in the purchase. And how many kickbacks can you get inside the country for buying your own liner? So, apparently, they try to shit as they can, so that later there would be more excuses - "why do you buy a watermelon and not a superjet", - "but patAmushta", and list all the shoals that they themselves organized.

[IL-18]

Azimut, having 11 superjets in stock, carried 2018 passengers in 700000. The reliability index is approximately the same as in Pobeda, with the B-737. Although one flight of all sides is already 1000, and 365 days a year. But (!) Once in 2012 I flew to the B-737 Transaero, and there were about 30 passengers, and the tickets were cheaper than Ural Airlines. SSJ filled at least a third, but then they almost did not fly.
Consequently, Aeroflot management may be suspected of sabotage. On the other hand, UAC, UEC, Rosoboronexport, factories and design bureaus under the auspices of the Government should organize service maintenance yesterday. But there will be a lot of foreigners spinning around, the budget just won’t be cut, they’ll hand over with giblets, if you don’t share, and the toad is probably crushing.

[lucul]

Problems with the preparation of maintenance personnel, or the usual sloppiness? ??

And do not even consider the version of targeted sabotage?

[Brand-new]

After such news, which is circulated by all media, ordinary people believe that the superjet is a bad and emergency plane, although in fact this is not at all the case. The employee showed negligence, I do not understand why write about each such case. So that people on the subcortex postpone Dry superjet = accident?

[Sayan]

And why was it published on VO?

[bober1982]

Quote: Sayan

And why was it published on VO?

Tomorrow is the message of the president to the Federal Assembly, this is how the public is warmed up.

[Finn]

Quote: Angelo Provolone

What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut. There are more than a dozen fixtures!

What is the difference how many fasteners? He didn’t close the first one. Well, the rest.

[iouris]

It has been known since ancient times that it is human nature to make mistakes. Errors caused by design and production shortcomings are a "human factor", errors caused by underachievement or a low level of motivation are a "personal factor".

[boris]

When reading a comment from donavi49, there is a strong suspicion
that this comrade is on a salary from the same Boeing and Airbus.

[Ros 56]

No one has yet been able to undo the rampage.

[trahterist]

Just a couple of weeks ago on TyTruba I saw a collection of clips about various non-fatal emergency situations in flight.
There, both Boeing and Airbus are also seen with torn covers.
And nothing, pax removed through the windows on mobile phones and laugh more!
But since this is a Superjet, we will make a sensation out of this, in general, so-so misunderstanding.

[Uran53]

That's it! Again "independent sofa analysts" will start yelling that everything is bad, our planes are bad! As for me, this is the usual sloppiness, which is over the hill in bulk. But everything is bad only in Russia.

[Alexander X]

During my service, it happened that hatches in flight lost. Human factor. Not fatal in this case. But, it is intended (s), sloppiness!

[Vitalian]

Quite regular news .. What now, each of our departure and landing media control?
What is waiting for interesting? Already the task is available ..?

[pafegosoff]

And who replaces the flight attendant? Well, the aircraft technician on the platform is a mess, and the pre-flight inspection? Kicked on wheels? This is not An-2 on the AChR. Although there they tried to take off with clamps ... My company commander was suspended from service and transferred to the school because he did not take off his small case with a flag on the LDPE already from Kutakhov himself!

[73bor]

AEROFLOT with SSJ CONSTANTLY has problems, suspiciously often.

[boris]

For wchin.
Bullshit is your post. Soviet civil aircraft for some reason
the parameters were inferior to the Western ones, in others they were superior. Quite
normally went for export and there for a long time and quite successfully operated
validity. If we compare by the criterion productivity /
cost, then Soviet aircraft were superior to Western ones by much.
You can find price data and compare.

[Po-tzan]

For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.
So either against the dry there is an American-Zionist conspiracy, or this time the dry built just perfect rubbish, which no one needs.

[Captain45]

Quote: PO-tzan

For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.

Do you know how many and to whom, according to the plan, the airline was supposed to deliver aircraft this year? Write with a link to the website of the airline, or else ... An empty market ...

[Nastia makarova]

2019 aircraft produced in 18

[Genry]

Quote: PO-tzan

For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.

You are promoting ACCENTED TRIBUTE from the "Komersant" edition !!!
According to the results for 2019 Sold 11 aircraft ...
Azimuth - 1 + 2 aircraft,
Severstal 1 + 2
Aeroflot - 5 (under the Christmas tree).

[Elena Zakharova]

Quote: PO-tzan

For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.

Well, why lie?
In 2019, 18 boards were produced!
Sold eleven!

[notingem]

Specialists fired. Scored non-drinkers and non-smokers. Fly gentlemen

[valery yan]

According to the instructions, the second pilot must conduct a pre-flight external inspection of the aircraft for possible malfunctions