Superjet had to interrupt flight due to technical problem


The Sukhoi Superjet 100, owned by Aeroflot and operating the Moscow-Stavropol flight on January 12, unexpectedly ran into a malfunction, which caused him to return to Sheremetyevo.


About it сообщает TASS news agency, citing a source in the emergency service.

During the flight, the crew noticed that there was no skin on the left engine, so he decided to return to the departure airport. Before landing, the aircraft had to circle for an hour and a half to work out fuel. The plane landed at Sheremetyevo Airport as usual.

At that time there were 55 passengers and six crew members on board. Fortunately, none of them were hurt.

The alleged cause of the incident was the negligence of one of the employees who poorly fastened the casing or forgot to do it at all. Therefore, it was thwarted by a strong stream of air during take-off.

In this situation, there are no complaints about the aircraft itself and its developers, although this does not always happen. It happens that the causes of incidents with "Superjets" are called the shortcomings of its design. Sometimes this is done in the interests of competitors, but in some cases such criticism is objective.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

92 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Tartar 13 January 2020 14: 47 New
    • 10
    • 6
    +4
    she was ripped off by a strong stream of air

    This is called free flow.
    1. Boomandroid 13 January 2020 14: 59 New
      • 13
      • 6
      +7
      Quote: TarTar
      she was ripped off by a strong stream of air

      This is called free flow.

      Why are these terms to people who are far from this topic? This is written as news for the consumer .. The most important thing is clear to him .. And the author’s thought and his assumptions))
      1. Elena Zakharova 13 January 2020 15: 14 New
        • 9
        • 7
        +2
        Quote: BoomAndroid
        Why are these terms for people

        Anyone wants to show off erudition
        1. Obi-Wan Kenobi 14 January 2020 06: 17 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Anyone wants to show off erudition

          Every thing needs to be called correctly. Yes, indeed, many terms are incomprehensible to people. But for this there are explanations and clarifications.
          Here you, Elena Nikolaevna, know how many wings have a Sukhoi Superjet 100? And why?
          But for that you know what erudition is and why it shines.
          1. Elena Zakharova 14 January 2020 12: 06 New
            • 0
            • 1
            -1
            Quote: Obi Wan Kenobi
            Here you, Elena Nikolaevna, know how many wings have a Sukhoi Superjet 100?

            Funny question ??
            What should I know there and why)))
            Something burst out laughing))

            All right.
            I will ask you a similar question.

            Do you, Obi Wan Kenobi (Sigismund Voldemarovich) know how many socks on the wing of the SU-27?
            And why are they needed there?
        2. Obi-Wan Kenobi 14 January 2020 06: 26 New
          • 0
          • 2
          -2
          And I’ll add.
          Here:
          The alleged cause of the incident was the negligence of one of the employees who poorly fastened the casing or forgot to do it at all.

          Most likely, it was not “the casing cover that was badly fixed”, and the bonnet cover of the engine nacelle was not locked.
      2. smart ass 14 January 2020 15: 02 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        I agree, do not know how to be clever do not handle
    2. Ros 56 13 January 2020 17: 59 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      This is called idiocy.
    3. smart ass 14 January 2020 15: 01 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Superjet not released at AvtoVAZ?
  2. Angelo Provolone 13 January 2020 14: 48 New
    • 12
    • 1
    +11
    What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut. There are more than a dozen fixtures!
    1. Same lech 13 January 2020 15: 00 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut. There are more than a dozen fixtures!

      What a level of insult ... What do you want the human factor ... I forgot to insert one letter per word or attachment and all ... the consequences are irreparable.
    2. kjhg 13 January 2020 17: 05 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Angelo Provolone
      What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut

      And if this casing was in the front of the fuselage and coming off, when taking off, hit the engine. It’s scary to think. Well, how so irresponsible you can relate to your work, on which the lives of many people may depend, I don’t understand request
      1. sanya_sergant 13 January 2020 17: 40 New
        • 2
        • 1
        +1
        ... scary to think ...

        You shouldn’t hang labels so seriously. "It’s scary to think ... what would happen ... but if my grandmother would have a Device ..."
        Surely not everything is so critical, torn off and torn off. I sat down normally. Surely the same hatch in front of the engine is closed by the three so as not to mess up.
        Do you agree that drunk driving is a criminal and a potential killer?
        However, everyone’s beloved character Otto von Stirlitz is drunk in Berlin and this doesn’t stop him from being a good hero.
        1. Piramidon 13 January 2020 20: 48 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: sanya_sergant
          Surely the same hatch in front of the engine is closed by the three so as not to mess up.

          As one of Murphy’s laws states, “If more than one person is responsible for a mistake in work, you cannot find the guilty.”
          1. sanya_sergant 13 January 2020 22: 34 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            A mechanic twists nuts
            The technician is looking to spin in the right direction
            PIC will then verify that everything is in place, everything is in order
      2. Kaw
        Kaw 13 January 2020 18: 22 New
        • 3
        • 4
        -1
        But it’s just that someone has poorly secured it now is not clear. Maybe the mounting of the part itself was unreliable? And blame will now be hanged on Vanya’s airport technician so that the plane does not discredit.
  3. Lord of the Sith 13 January 2020 14: 55 New
    • 6
    • 20
    -14
    Come on, finish the superjet already.
    1. Elena Zakharova 13 January 2020 15: 15 New
      • 10
      • 10
      0
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Come on, finish the superjet already.

      Will not work.
      The plane is good.
      1. Lord of the Sith 13 January 2020 15: 32 New
        • 3
        • 5
        -2
        What does "fail" mean? A priori, any technology has a foundation for the future.
        Like childhood illnesses.
    2. NKT
      NKT 13 January 2020 15: 32 New
      • 17
      • 0
      +17
      It happens....


    3. parma 14 January 2020 07: 04 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      Come on, finish the superjet already.

      You missed the word "budget", and forgot the letter "a" .. The most accurate "Come on, finish the budget of the superjet already"
      1. Lord of the Sith 14 January 2020 10: 32 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Just don’t have to la la la cut the budget.
        The stakes on the new plane are too high to steal money pointlessly.
        1. parma 14 January 2020 11: 41 New
          • 1
          • 1
          0
          Quote: Lord of the Sith
          Just don’t have to la la la cut the budget.
          The stakes on the new plane are too high to steal money pointlessly.

          Any major project means big stakes ... The same "eastern" one, and even the leadership of the country admitted that they "stole money meaninglessly" ... Yes, and "cut" is not always a direct theft, it is often just a job to work with 0 result for a large salary;)
  4. Romka 13 January 2020 15: 00 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    Just a little counted, a little screwed up, a little bit of screening ..... save those who can plant on a corn field. How to know how “simple” pilots had to?
    1. Captain45 14 January 2020 03: 10 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Romka
      Just a little counted, a little screwed up, a little bit of screening ..... save those who can plant on a corn field. How to know how “simple” pilots had to?

      Take the change of technicians to the corn field .... And .... from the machines ... with long lines ... in front of another shift, so that it penetrates .... Then all the bolts and screws will be tightened tight. There is no other way, for, as Grandfather Fishka used to say, "the people have lost their temper" (c) "Eternal Call" And Ivanov.
  5. balunn 13 January 2020 15: 01 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    Come on, finish the superjet already.

    For me, as a passenger, the plane is very good. But in market conditions, they most likely will not finish it. Economically unprofitable.
    1. St Petrov 13 January 2020 16: 24 New
      • 10
      • 12
      -2
      Economically unprofitable.


      the most successful model among competitors. It is economically unprofitable to buy airbuses and Boeing. 200 pieces.

      And to gradually localize is good.
      1. balunn 13 January 2020 16: 49 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        You explain this to the leaders of the airlines. And ask the question why they take Boeing and Airbuses, not ssj-100
        1. St Petrov 13 January 2020 17: 04 New
          • 10
          • 6
          +4
          If we compare the supplies of the SSJ100 only with the airplane models closest in terms of passenger capacity (CRJ900 - 88 seats, CRJ1000 - 100 seats, CS100 - 110 seats, E190 - 98 seats, E195 - 108 seats, Lineage 1000E - VIP version E190, ARJ - 105 passengers) , then the share of SSJ100 in 2017 will be 36%.

          I mean, that it is in its segment that the most successful CSJ among competitors. Mitsubishi did not finish. And the money poured several times more, about the same for the Chinese

          If you consider that the SSJ with chronic underfunding of the project - then Sukhoi is simply handsome

          1. St Petrov 13 January 2020 17: 31 New
            • 5
            • 5
            0
            Embriere and Bombardier made projects based on previously developed and in-production machines.

            Superjet costs rose from 1,8 to 2,5 billion. 190 production aircraft were produced.

            The Chinese, having started simultaneously with the GSS, and having spent 8 billion, released a dozen and a half ARJ.

            The Japanese started two years later, spent 4,5 billion and expect to start mass production in 2021 (but this is in question).

        2. Guillon 13 January 2020 19: 31 New
          • 5
          • 1
          +4
          Because there is no limit to greed! request They want to eat honey, and even a spoon !!! belay
          In Soviet times, in the first place was safety и reliability, and now the maximum profit! am
          1. wchin 13 January 2020 19: 55 New
            • 2
            • 15
            -13
            Quote: Gillaton
            In Soviet times, safety and reliability came first.

            What nonsense. In the USSR, civilian jets were not produced at all. More precisely, what is called "civilian jets" around the world. "Soviet civilian jets" were produced in the USSR. These were strange products that no one needed in a free market.
            So SSJ, this is the firstborn. And not all of it is lumpy, as a well-known saying goes.
            1. Elena Zakharova 14 January 2020 15: 58 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: wchin
              What nonsense. In the USSR, civilian jets were not produced at all.

              But what about the IL-86 ???
        3. vfwfr 14 January 2020 19: 50 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Boeing and airbus can deliver even now "conditionally" .. ours have three on the slipway from the force ... But this is not accurate.
          This superjet, born at Poghosyan ... Pipe, wings, our chassis. the rest is imported. They wanted to reduce time on spare parts. Import has shown the essence, they may not give competitors spare parts ... They finally decided to stir up things, but here the airline executives do not want to tempt fate, to believe Ivan Ivanitch and Company, his son or grandson, that everything will be fine and profitable and without haemorrhoids. In addition: Boeing and Airbus are certified for flights to the USA, EUROPA, ASIA, EAST ... But the process is not fast, but we need airplanes now. (As I see it. I printed it. Reliability is not confirmed.)
    2. SSR
      SSR 13 January 2020 18: 25 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      Quote: balunn
      For me, as a passenger, the plane is very good. But in market conditions, they most likely will not finish it.

      Comrade, he has already begun to "finish". There is a task to remove at least American components. The US was able to impose a ban on the sale of Superjet to Iran precisely because they have a voice and their products there seem to be a little more than 10%.
  6. kupitman 13 January 2020 15: 01 New
    • 32
    • 8
    +24
    Boeing interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - nothing happens.
    ssj interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - everything is bad, they can’t do anything, they can’t fly, they don’t want to do
    1. Ross xnumx 13 January 2020 15: 18 New
      • 9
      • 4
      +5
      Quote: kupitman
      Boeing interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - nothing happens.
      ssj interrupted the flight due to a malfunction - everything is bad

      Just Boeing in the world flies a little more than SSJ-comrade. Therefore, such a reaction ...
      The bad in our case is less than the good. In different Soviet times, the same case would be considered as sabotage, with all the ensuing conclusions. The author of the words correctly noted:
      Quote: The same Lech
      What do you want the human factor ... I forgot to insert one letter per word or attachment and all ... the consequences are irreparable.

      I don’t know who benefits economically that in civil and military aviation of the Russian Federation planes fall like sleepy flies or break down ...
  7. loki565 13 January 2020 15: 07 New
    • 15
    • 4
    +11
    It seems that the ground services are specifically trying to ditch the Superjet. Recently, there was a case that they forgot to remove the grounding cable and during the flight, with a crutch, hollowed through the hull turning it into a colander. It’s good that it did not get into the elevator and did not jam it.


    1. Ross xnumx 13 January 2020 15: 22 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: loki565
      Recently, there was a case that they forgot to remove the grounding cable and, during portlet, crushed it with a crutch along the body, turning it into a colander.

      Symbolic translation:
      Life shot - "shot in life" ...
    2. Golovan Jack 13 January 2020 15: 30 New
      • 9
      • 8
      +1
      Quote: loki565
      Recently there was a case ...

      IMHO this is the case when the incident has a name.

      Next is the work of the services appropriate to the occasion ... everything is already there. Routine, oddly enough.

      I am not a journalist, so I will not post versions. My right, by the way laughing
    3. Korg 14 January 2020 18: 20 New
      • 0
      • 2
      -2
      What a salary - such a job!
  8. Mountain shooter 13 January 2020 15: 11 New
    • 8
    • 10
    -2
    Normal plane. Abnormal sloppiness!
    1. Elena Zakharova 13 January 2020 15: 17 New
      • 5
      • 3
      +2
      Sheremetyevo is the most problematic airport in Russia.
      1. Rushnairfors 13 January 2020 15: 38 New
        • 8
        • 4
        +4
        And not only the Sheremetyevo business. There are many questions for Comrade Araflot, who is doing everything to make this plane fly as rarely as possible and "mow" as often as possible. as far as I know from the guys flying in this company, the state pays a lot of money for a simple fleet of superjets, I don’t remember what the salt is, but in short: the planes are standing, the money towing, everything is fine.
        P.S. And so the guys who fly on ssj say that Samzel is very even at the level
        1. donavi49 13 January 2020 15: 59 New
          • 10
          • 5
          +5
          Aeroflot and any large company need only 2 types of aircraft - Watermelon and Boeing. All others are weights and unnecessary ballast.

          Everything will also be with the MS-21.

          It is not profitable for the company to have another 3 type / philosophy - which requires expenses for training, maintenance, taking into account various nuances, and at the same time the share of the park is ~ 10%, and the share of profit is even less.
          1. NKT
            NKT 13 January 2020 16: 16 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            And what about regional aircraft? Canadians buy or Brazilians?
            1. donavi49 13 January 2020 16: 48 New
              • 6
              • 5
              +1
              A220 is wink . Integrated in a network of watermelon. The best choice. The Brazilians have not yet integrated into the Boeing network, but the process is already underway. It will physically take some time.

              As a result, A and B remained with the regionals.
              1. NKT
                NKT 13 January 2020 17: 39 New
                • 1
                • 2
                -1
                A220 in a sense, a competitor to A318, do not you find?
          2. St Petrov 13 January 2020 16: 27 New
            • 2
            • 8
            -6
            a separate carrier will soon be created for the CSW.

  9. Thrifty 13 January 2020 15: 39 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Problems with the preparation of maintenance personnel, or the usual sloppiness? ??
    1. cherkas.oe 13 January 2020 16: 04 New
      • 3
      • 4
      -1
      [quote = Lean] or ordinary sloppiness? ?? [/ qu And maybe the unusual. After all, if the car will prove itself well, it will have priority in the purchase. And how many kickbacks can I get inside the country for buying my ship? It seems that they are trying to spoil as much as they can, so that there would be more excuses afterwards - “why buy a watermelon and not a superjet”, - “but patAmushta”, and they will list all the jambs that they organized themselves.
      1. IL-18 14 January 2020 00: 04 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Azimut, having 11 superjets available, transported 2018 passengers in 700000. Reliability index approximately, as in Victory, with B-737. Although one flight of all sides is already 1000, and 365 days a year. But (!) Once in 2012, he flew to Transaero B-737, and there were 30 passengers, and tickets are cheaper than Ural Airlines. SSJ is at least a third filled, but then they almost did not fly.
        Consequently, Aeroflot management may be suspected of sabotage. On the other hand, UAC, UEC, Rosoboronexport, factories and design bureaus under the auspices of the Government should organize service maintenance yesterday. But there will be a lot of foreigners spinning around, the budget just won’t be cut, they’ll hand over with giblets, if you don’t share, and the toad is probably crushing.
    2. lucul 13 January 2020 19: 06 New
      • 1
      • 6
      -5
      Problems with the preparation of maintenance personnel, or the usual sloppiness? ??

      And do not even consider the version of targeted sabotage?
  10. Brand-new 13 January 2020 15: 55 New
    • 7
    • 5
    +2
    After such news, which is circulated by all media, ordinary people believe that the superjet is a bad and emergency plane, although in fact this is not at all the case. The employee showed negligence, I do not understand why write about each such case. So that people on the subcortex postpone Dry superjet = accident?
  11. Sayan 13 January 2020 16: 13 New
    • 4
    • 9
    -5
    And why was it published on VO?
    1. bober1982 13 January 2020 16: 57 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Sayan
      And why was it published on VO?

      Tomorrow is the message of the president to the Federal Assembly, this is how the public is warmed up.
  12. Finn 13 January 2020 16: 19 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Angelo Provolone
    What nonsense should there be? ETOGES is not a hood on a car, which is clicked shut. There are more than a dozen fixtures!

    What is the difference how many fasteners? He didn’t close the first one. Well, the rest.
  13. iouris 13 January 2020 17: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    From ancient times it is known that it is human nature to make mistakes. Errors caused by constructive-production flaws are the "human factor", errors due to underestimation or a low level of motivation are the "personality factor".
  14. borys 13 January 2020 17: 30 New
    • 5
    • 6
    -1
    When reading a comment from donavi49, there is a strong suspicion
    that this comrade is on a salary from the same Boeing and Airbus.
  15. Ros 56 13 January 2020 17: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    No one has yet been able to undo the rampage.
  16. trahterist 13 January 2020 18: 22 New
    • 8
    • 2
    +6
    Just a couple of weeks ago on TyTruba I saw a collection of clips about various non-fatal emergency situations in flight.
    There, both Boeing and Airbus are also seen with torn covers.
    And nothing, pax removed through the windows on mobile phones and laugh more!
    But since this is a Superjet, we will make a sensation out of this, in general, so-so misunderstanding.
  17. Uran53 13 January 2020 18: 33 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    Well, that’s it! Again, "independent couch analysts" will start screaming that everything is bad, our planes are bad! As for me, this is the usual sloppiness, which is also in bulk in the hill. But everything is bad only in Russia.
  18. Alexander X 13 January 2020 19: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    During my service, it happened that hatches in flight lost. Human factor. Not fatal in this case. But, it is intended (s), sloppiness!
  19. Vitalian 13 January 2020 19: 18 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quite regular news .. What now, each of our departure and landing media control?
    What is waiting for interesting? Already the task is available ..?
  20. pafegosoff 13 January 2020 19: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And who replaces the flight attendant? Well, the aircraft technician on the platform is a mess, and the pre-flight inspection? Kicked on wheels? This is not An-2 on the AChR. Although there they tried to take off with clamps ... My company commander was suspended from service and transferred to the school because he did not take off his small case with a flag on the LDPE already from Kutakhov himself!
  21. 73bor 13 January 2020 19: 36 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    AEROFLOT with SSJ CONSTANTLY has problems, suspiciously often.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. borys 13 January 2020 20: 35 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    For wchin.
    Bullshit is your post. Soviet civil aircraft for some reason
    the parameters were inferior to the Western ones, in others they were superior. Quite
    normally went for export and there for a long time and quite successfully operated
    validity. If we compare by the criterion productivity /
    cost, then Soviet aircraft were superior to Western ones by much.
    You can find price data and compare.
  24. Po-tzan 13 January 2020 22: 04 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.
    So either against the dry there is an American-Zionist conspiracy, or this time the dry built just perfect rubbish, which no one needs.

    1. Captain45 14 January 2020 03: 04 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: PO-tzan
      For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.

      Do you know how many and to whom, according to the plan, the airline was supposed to deliver aircraft this year? Write with a link to the website of the airline, or else ... An empty market ...
    2. Nastia makarova 14 January 2020 08: 00 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      2019 aircraft produced in 18
    3. Genry 14 January 2020 10: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: PO-tzan
      For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.

      You are promoting the accented nonsense from the publication "Komersant" !!!
      According to the results for 2019 Sold 11 aircraft ...
      Azimuth - 1 + 2 aircraft,
      Severstal 1 + 2
      Aeroflot - 5 (under the Christmas tree).
    4. Elena Zakharova 14 January 2020 16: 02 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: PO-tzan
      For the whole of 2019, a dry superjet sold 1 (ONE !!!) aircraft.

      Well, why lie?
      In 2019, 18 boards were produced!
      Sold eleven!
  25. notingem 13 January 2020 23: 57 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Specialists fired. Scored non-drinkers and non-smokers. Fly gentlemen
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. valery yan 14 January 2020 21: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    According to the instructions, the second pilot must conduct a pre-flight external inspection of the aircraft for possible malfunctions