News

US Navy accuses Russian intelligence ship Ivan Hurs of "dangerous rapprochement"

103
US Navy accuses Russian intelligence ship Ivan Hurs of "dangerous rapprochement"

The US Navy has accused the Russian reconnaissance ship Ivan Hurs of “making dangerous proximity” with the USS Farragut (DDG-99) in the northern Arabian Sea. The American destroyer provided combat security for the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Harry Truman. This was stated by the command of the 5th operational fleet USA.


On Thursday, a Russian ship made an aggressive maneuver against an American missile destroyer in the northern Arabian Sea. The Farragut was part of the carrier carrier group of the Harry Truman aircraft carrier when the Russian reconnaissance ship Ivan Hurs approached the destroyer from behind.

- said in a statement.

In turn, the Russian Defense Ministry denied the accusations of the American side, saying that there was no violation by the Ivan Khurs reconnaissance ship, namely, the American destroyer violated international rules for preventing collisions at sea.

The replicated statement by representatives of the 5th fleet of the US Navy about the alleged "dangerous" rapprochement between the Russian ship and the destroyer Farragut in the Arabian Sea is untrue. It was the US Navy destroyer, being on the left course of the Russian warship moving forward, on January 9, 2020, grossly violated international rules for preventing collisions of ships at sea, having made a maneuver to intersect its course

- declared in the Ministry of Defense


The military department accused American sailors of unprofessionalism and deliberate violation of international safety standards for navigation.

The Convention on the International Rules for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea of ​​1972, Rule No. 15 (“Cross-cutting Situation”) defines: “when two ships with mechanical engines run at intersecting courses so that there is a danger of a collision, then a ship that has another on its right to the side, must give way to another vessel and in so doing, if circumstances allow, to avoid crossing the course of the other vessel along its bow "
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

We are in Yandex Zen
Strengthened. The destroyer USS Milius DDG-7 arrived at the base of the 69 fleet of the US Navy.
And that's not all ... "Harry Truman" entered the Mediterranean with a small part of his group
103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Vladimir_2U
    Vladimir_2U 11 January 2020 06: 17 New
    • 21
    • 5
    +16
    They were not afraid on the Khursa, they didn’t leave the course. ) But the boat is noticeably smaller than the American.
    1. WILL
      WILL 11 January 2020 06: 30 New
      • 30
      • 4
      +26
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      They were not afraid on the Khursa, they didn’t leave the course. ) But the boat is noticeably smaller than the American.

      Well done! good The captain and crew worked perfectly and harmoniously, in the Traditions of the Russian Navy!
      From the Amer captain - take away the "rights" and check for alcohol and drugs!
      1. Serg koma
        Serg koma 11 January 2020 07: 14 New
        • 13
        • 1
        +12
        "On Thursday, January 9, during planned operations in the north of the Arabian Sea, the ship of the Russian Navy aggressively approached the ship USS Farragut (DDG 99)," the message says
        The Farragut destroyer team gave 5 short beeps, signaling the danger of a collision, and demanded a change of course, after which the Ivan Khurs reconnaissance “initially refused, but eventually changed course"Added the US Navy.

        In explanation of the destroyer, they are explained by the explanation that he allegedly did not allow the dangerous rapprochement between Ivan Khurs and Harry Truman, but as a result of the maneuvers, Ivan Khurs appeared on the port side of the destroyer, and therefore approached the supposed (according to the Yankees version) place the presence of "Harry Truman" in the warrant laughing
        1. To be or not to be
          To be or not to be 11 January 2020 09: 21 New
          • 6
          • 11
          -5
          The goal of the “Ivan Khurs" maneuver is not clear?
          -show off?
          - Something had to be photographed?
          - have the Yankees lost something?
          Usually, when approaching an American order, they are asked to follow their order and they
          give the go-ahead and indicate the place of the scout in the warrant.
          And when they are not in their warrant and the beginning of aviation flights from the Yanko aircraft carrier, they indicate the beginning of flights and the safe removal of the reconnaissance ship
          1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
            ALEKSANDR KUTS 11 January 2020 12: 11 New
            • 14
            • 1
            +13
            But I am surprised) Where have you read this?
            Firstly: where on the video or in the available photos did you even see which order?
            Who told you this, about some kind of requests to a potential enemy and his answers, if the same MPPSS-72 do not require it? Why are you talking nonsense?
            The same rules also stipulate signals that are OBLIGED to raise to AB when they are either going to raise or receive aircraft (s).
            It should be noted that in the video we do not observe any maneuver of “Ivan Hurs”, the ship goes its course without turns, this can be seen even in the final video and in one of the photos, the wake of the ships is clearly visible there. From the same trace it is clear that it was the American who was approaching and dangerously crossed the course of our ship, precisely violating the MPPSS.
            I dare to suggest, It is quite possible that AB was going to replenish supplies, well, let's say from the starboard side, where the supply ship was supposed to go. And our ship was tasked with how to complicate it, to delay in time the beginning of this operation. For what he actually tried to get closer to AB. I just wanted to take a position from the starboard side of the AB and follow a parallel course, not necessarily even at a dangerous distance. MPPSS allows this, by the way.)
            And perhaps he was tasked with distracting the EM from himself, for which this is a different question, well, let's assume to make it easier for our submariners .....
            And the fact that the Yankees themselves violated all the rules is obvious. Their ship catches up with ours, while dangerously approaching and crossing its course having our ship on its starboard side.
            That something like this.
            1. To be or not to be
              To be or not to be 11 January 2020 13: 26 New
              • 1
              • 7
              -6
              ALEKSANDR KUTS (Sailor) Today, 12:11 NEW
              +2
              But I am surprised) Where have you read this? "

              In the Mediterranean hi
              1. Looking for
                Looking for 11 January 2020 16: 13 New
                • 2
                • 1
                +1
                Which of the American ships did they serve? What is the nickname of the Russian letters missing?
            2. To be or not to be
              To be or not to be 11 January 2020 19: 01 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              The aircraft carrier itself does not walk. Yes, and the article says: "The American destroyer provided military security for the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Harry Truman.
              We look at the composition of his group:
              In the north arabian sea
              Carrier Strike Group 8
              Aircraft carrier
              USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75), homeported in Norfolk, Va.
              Carrier Air Wing 1 Carrier Air Wing 1 is based at Naval Air Station Oceana, Va., And embarked on Harry S. Truman:
              • The “Red Rippers” of VFA-11 - Strike Fighter Squadron (VFA) - from Naval Air Station Oceana - Va.
              • The “Checkmates” of VFA-211 from Naval Air Station Oceana - Va.
              • The “Sunliners” of VFA-81 from Naval Air Station Oceana - Va.
              • The “Knighthawks” of VFA-136 from Naval Air Station Lemoore - Calif.
              • The “Rooks” of VAQ-137 - Electronic Attack Squadron (VAQ) - from Naval Air Station Whidbey Island - Wash.
              • The “Seahawks” of VAW-126 - Carrier Airborne Early Warning Squadron (VAW) - from Naval Air Station Norfolk - Va.
              • The “Rawhides” of VRC-40 - Detachment - Fleet Logistics Support Squadron (VRC) - from Naval Air Station Norfolk - Va.
              • The “Dragon Slayers” of HSC-11 - Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron (HSC) - from Naval Air Station Norfolk - Va.
              • The “Proud Warriors” of HSM-72 - Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron (HSM) - from Naval Air Station Jacksonville - Fla.
              Cruiser USS Normandy (CG-60), homeported in Norfolk, Va.
              Destroyer Squadron 28 Destroyer Squadron 28 is based at Norfolk, Va., And its leaders are embarked on Truman.
              • USS Lassen (DDG-82), homeported in Mayport, Fla.
              • USS Farragut (DDG-99), homeported in Mayport, Fla.
              • USS Forrest Sherman (DDG-98), homeported in Norfolk, Va.
              1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 02: 00 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                It turns out that you don’t quite understand what an “aviation group” is))), I also didn’t understand very well with English) ......
                of everything you copied and presented here, the term warrant, or as it is customary to say AUG here refers to three EMs and a URO cruiser, everything else is the aviation wing (aviation group) of this AB, with their names and place of permanent (main) base.
                Actually, there is one more thing in the protection of the AB - there should be two submarines, but they were apparently modestly silent about them).
                Yes, but you are aware that the AB has a type of short-range protection, but there is a long-range? And all of these ships do not necessarily go straight next to the AB, since you often see in all sorts of pictures (advertising).
                read on ..... in the Mediterranean))
                1. To be or not to be
                  To be or not to be 13 January 2020 12: 46 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Unlike you, I have seen them at sea more than once.
                  And I know how the distillation games end and that side loved to "joke"
                  Usually they don’t talk about submarines. But the Yankees think that there is a submarine under the reconnaissance ship .. And they raise their plane and throw buoys (which successfully become the prey of the reconnaissance ship).
                  1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                    ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 17: 09 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    You tell us plots of movies shtole))
                    No, the plane with these same buoys, it’s usually there, well, in the sense, away from AB, yeah.
                    And if it is necessary where closer, then they usually raise the helicopter and maybe even two, which (e) works as a lowered sonar device. Yes, I saw them too .....

                    ........ three hours in the position of the use of weapons .... AB Midway
                    1. To be or not to be
                      To be or not to be 13 January 2020 17: 34 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Why do you rewrite me ZVO. ???
                      I still read it. When he was in the package on a subscription wink
                      Can you tell (not from the movie) how did Saratoga fly to the Turkish Muavinet at night ??
                      1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                        ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 17: 37 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        who cares, who pics about a past life
                      2. To be or not to be
                        To be or not to be 13 January 2020 17: 53 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Welcome no offense..
                    2. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                      ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 17: 53 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      Yes, I would fit you and pictures of his son, very good. impressive, already present, but time did not work out.
                      But in general, the people who saw the AB are not so few, there are not many old photos, and the new ones have not yet been put into public viewing, it’s a pity of course ... people would be glad.
                      But the news itself is for the public, and sometimes similar incidents happen weekly. What can you do, if there is an order, it must be followed, but the overwhelming majority of what is happening may seem strange, or even funny ......., well, maybe it’s good smile
                    3. To be or not to be
                      To be or not to be 13 January 2020 17: 58 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Thank you.
                      This is not news - everything happens at sea .. And often even cooler. But try not to inflate and do it right .. It is scary. When people die ..
                    4. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                      ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 18: 03 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      Oh, anegdod ......
                      Son asks father:
                      “Dad, why are all sailors bald or gray?”
                      dad answers
                      -You understand, son, gray-haired are those who served under the command of bald .......
                    5. To be or not to be
                      To be or not to be 13 January 2020 18: 10 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      wink ..I got it. in both categories laughing
  2. dirk182
    dirk182 11 January 2020 12: 17 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Actually, as stated in Rule 15 of the MPPSS-72 "When two ships with mechanical engines go at intersecting courses so that there is a danger of collision, a ship that has another on its right side must give way to another ship, if circumstances permit, avoid crossing the course of another ship at his course. "In fact, the Americans cut our guys.
    1. Victorio
      Victorio 11 January 2020 22: 24 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: dirk182
      Actually, as stated in Rule 15 of the MPPSS-72 "When two ships with mechanical engines go at intersecting courses so that there is a danger of collision, a ship that has another on its right side must give way to another ship, if circumstances permit, avoid crossing the course of another ship at his course. "In fact, the Americans cut our guys.

      ===
      here, probably, another point:

      Rule 13 - Overtaking

      (a) Notwithstanding the requirements contained in the Rules of this section, each vessel overtaking the other shall be kept clear of the path of the vessel being overtaken.

      it’s not entirely clear in the video, the American left ahead, and then slowed down?
      1. dirk182
        dirk182 13 January 2020 08: 53 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        on the video that I watched ours walked right on the starboard side of the American and were cropped by them .... it didn’t seem to me that there was overtaking
        1. Victorio
          Victorio 14 January 2020 15: 50 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: dirk182
          on the video that I watched ours walked right on the starboard side of the American and were cropped by them .... it didn’t seem to me that there was overtaking

          ====
          here in this video the actions of the American are taken from the Russian ship https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqF6EcShwP0
          1. dirk182
            dirk182 14 January 2020 16: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            so here it’s clearly and clearly visible that ours fell into the wake of the American ...
  • novobranets
    novobranets 11 January 2020 08: 18 New
    • 5
    • 0
    +5
    Quote: ANIMAL
    From the Amer captain - take away the "rights" and check for alcohol and drugs!

    And to retake him, the loser. am
  • knn54
    knn54 11 January 2020 11: 11 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    It's just that US sailors “forgot” the rules for passing ships (Convention on International Rules for Preventing Collisions at Sea at 1972) at intersecting courses.
    1. Looking for
      Looking for 11 January 2020 16: 16 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Americans simply apply the rules and laws depending on whether they are profitable or not.
  • Ax Matt
    Ax Matt 13 January 2020 17: 03 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Up to the confiscation of the vehicle in favor of our state! wassat
  • Serg65
    Serg65 11 January 2020 07: 30 New
    • 19
    • 1
    +18
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    Do not be afraid on the "Hursa"

    He, a scout, is once afraid of work!
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 11 January 2020 07: 48 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      ours, apparently, decided to "flash through" the Truman warrant, which caused "righteous" anger among the mattresses ...
      a bold decision ... respect intelligence commander, definitely ...
      1. Serg65
        Serg65 11 January 2020 07: 51 New
        • 18
        • 1
        +17
        Quote: kepmor
        Respect Commander Respect, definitely ...

        In the second half of the last century, American navy men called our naval scouts "Fly in the Soup." So, this is a long tradition of our EQUIPMENT!
  • Cry
    Cry 11 January 2020 07: 44 New
    • 3
    • 29
    -26
    The American is right because he set up his butt to save the aircraft carrier.
    1. bessmertniy
      bessmertniy 11 January 2020 08: 30 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Poop or what? recourse But close, really impressive! good
    2. Andrey VOV
      Andrey VOV 11 January 2020 09: 24 New
      • 11
      • 0
      +11
      Well, yes, it is in the tradition of the modern American Navy to substitute the ass ..... generally feed))))
    3. Ramzaj99
      Ramzaj99 11 January 2020 09: 32 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Choro
      The American is right, because he set up his ass, for the sake of saving the aircraft carrier

      In the sea, who crosses the course from one angle is not possible to understand. This is visible only from above on the wake trail.
      I admit that the Americans are lying deliberately. The last time they lied to the end ......
      1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
        ALEKSANDR KUTS 11 January 2020 12: 18 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        How is it not clear if we clearly see that it is our ship that is to the right of the American? Moreover, the video shows that the American catches up with our ship, overtakes it and crosses its course. What other perspective is needed to understand that it was the American EM that intentionally violated the IPSS?)
    4. Serg koma
      Serg koma 11 January 2020 09: 38 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Quote: Choro
      framed his ass, to save the aircraft carrier.

      wassat
      Framed "ass" for the penetration of an enemy ship inside the order - Respect for Americans from LGBT

      On the USS Farragut (DDG 99) urgently raise the flag of belonging (pictured above) wassat laughing
      1. Cry
        Cry 11 January 2020 17: 30 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        But he found himself, as his backside is more expensive than an aircraft carrier.
    5. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 11 January 2020 19: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Choro
      American is right because he set up his ass

      He painted that blue paint, once substitutes the stern.
  • Yuri Yaroshevsky
    Yuri Yaroshevsky 11 January 2020 10: 48 New
    • 2
    • 17
    -15
    Yes, and the American fleet is slightly larger than the Russian ......... Americans do not climb on the rampage and the Russians use it and think that they are afraid. ...... They could turn a Russian ship into dust above water if they wanted to. .... Just a homespun truth .........
    1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
      ALEKSANDR KUTS 11 January 2020 12: 47 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      In this case, it is the Americans who are getting into trouble .........
      Well, they’re not afraid, but they’re afraid, yes.)
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 11 January 2020 17: 33 New
      • 7
      • 1
      +6
      Quote: Yuri Yaroshevsky
      Just a homespun truth

      Just Svidomo nonsense. yes
  • tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 11 January 2020 12: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    They were not afraid on the Khursa, they didn’t leave the course. ) But the boat is noticeably smaller than the American.

    Not certainly in that way. USS "Farragut" was at the "Ivan Hurs" on the port side. According to the IPPSS rule 15. American must give way. “Hurs” gave 5 short ones (pay attention), then one long one, that is, “I turn right.” But the American is right here, the video shows that Khurs has more speed and overtakes USS Farragut. Rule 13 “Overtaking” comes into effect. Regardless of the requirements contained in the Rules of this Section, each vessel that overtakes the other must be kept clear of the path overtaking the vessel.
    A vessel is considered to overtake another vessel when it approaches it from a direction of more than 22.5 behind the last beam, i.e. when the overtaking vessel is in such a position with respect to the overtaking that at night, the overtaking vessel can only see the stern light of the overtaking vessel and cannot see any of its side lights.
    If there is any doubt as to whether the vessel is overtaking, it should be considered that this is the case and act accordingly.
    No subsequent change in the relative position of the two vessels may give rise to consider the overtaking vessel, in the meaning of these Rules, as a vessel heading for a course crossing, or to relieve the overtaking vessel from the obligation to stay away from the overtaking vessel until it is finally completed and left behind.
    Well, based on the video, I do not see such a critical situation for a collision. “Khurs” understood the situation as a normal skipper, the American, too (video recording from him) calmly accepted this situation. For the media and people who see the sea from the coast, this is an incident, and for skippers this is a common occurrence, of which there are a dozen per day.
  • x.andvlad
    x.andvlad 11 January 2020 15: 49 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Vladimir_2U
    They were not afraid on the Khursa, they didn’t leave the course. ) But the boat is noticeably smaller than the American.

    Yes, we must pay tribute to our sailors. Apparently, they temporarily lost momentum, let the “fools” go forward, and then again gained momentum. It was then that mattresses were mantled, even some kind of “people” ran to their stern, apparently to watch. I am sure that our captain reliably controlled the situation.
  • Connor MacLeod
    Connor MacLeod 11 January 2020 06: 18 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Exploration by battle wink
    1. Professor
      Professor 11 January 2020 09: 50 New
      • 8
      • 19
      -11
      Quote: Connor MacLeod
      Exploration by battle wink

      What battle? You can show off very much when you know that the snout is not cleaned. Do you know what they call drivers on the road?
      1. Shooter22
        Shooter22 11 January 2020 14: 28 New
        • 4
        • 1
        +3
        Hi Professor! Are you very sure that the commander of the reconnaissance ship was engaged in a show off? And the difference between ship driving and showing off on a personal car is very different! hi
        1. Professor
          Professor 11 January 2020 16: 09 New
          • 4
          • 6
          -2
          Quote: Shooter22
          Hi Professor! Are you very sure that the commander of the reconnaissance ship was engaged in a show off? And the difference between ship driving and showing off on a personal car is very different! hi

          A scout must follow the warrant and collect everything and everything including all the garbage that is thrown overboard. And we are witnessing a demonstration of unprofessionalism.
          1. To be or not to be
            To be or not to be 11 January 2020 17: 05 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            IN! And the garbage is called Pts modestly - "bastard" laughing
          2. Shooter22
            Shooter22 11 January 2020 17: 35 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            The commander of a military ship, in the first place, must comply with the orders of the command. And secondly, the reconnaissance ship is not a garbage truck, now reconnaissance is carried out in other ways (if this, of course, is not a joke - about garbage collection). Where did you read about going for an order? Or did you send a training manual from the GRU for marine intelligence?
            And I am very doubtful that the commander of Ivan Khurs is not a professional. Just everyone performed the task.
            1. Professor
              Professor 11 January 2020 18: 03 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              Quote: Shooter22
              The commander of a military ship, in the first place, must comply with the orders of the command. And secondly, the reconnaissance ship is not a garbage truck, now reconnaissance is carried out in other ways (if this, of course, is not a joke - about garbage collection). Where did you read about going for an order? Or did you send a training manual from the GRU for marine intelligence?
              And I am very doubtful that the commander of Ivan Khurs is not a professional. Just everyone performed the task.
              1. Shooter22
                Shooter22 11 January 2020 19: 53 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                “There it didn’t smell like a battering ram.” (recent: "Yaroslav the Wise", "Admiral Vinogradov").
                - It was, but it passed. Garbage is not collected. This is the lot of the green.
                “When you went to the sea (if you went), did you also consider the ship’s commander to be a layman?” Or were they immediately written off ashore? First, give a reference to the Opinion of the commission to investigate the incident with the "Estuary", and then we will talk about the professionalism of its commander. Okay?

                This is an ordinary ordinary event, not worth such a screech in the media. The occasion used is "sprinkle with saliva." No more.
                1. Professor
                  Professor 11 January 2020 21: 16 New
                  • 2
                  • 2
                  0
                  Quote: Shooter22
                  “There it didn’t smell like a battering ram.” (recent: "Yaroslav the Wise", "Admiral Vinogradov").
                  - It was, but it passed. Garbage is not collected. This is the lot of the green.
                  “When you went to the sea (if you went), did you also consider the ship’s commander to be a layman?” Or were they immediately written off ashore? First, give a reference to the Opinion of the commission to investigate the incident with the "Estuary", and then we will talk about the professionalism of its commander. Okay?

                  This is an ordinary ordinary event, not worth such a screech in the media. The occasion used is "sprinkle with saliva." No more.

                  - If you didn’t go to the ram, then its actions are not at all clear.
                  - Garbage collected and collected.
                  - I met different commanders. Not everyone was smart and professional.
                  - The conclusions of the commission are classified. With what?
                  - This is not an ordinary event, but a violation of the contract of 1972.
                  1. Shooter22
                    Shooter22 12 January 2020 01: 15 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    - Once again: Which ram? Wake watched? Do you really think that at the helm of a Russian ship, who decided in neutral waters to thus bring himself to the pantheon of glory? Professor, right you do sophistry.
                    - Is this your opinion (about garbage) or a confirmed fact? Throw a link? (just wondering
                    - Since you didn’t see the conclusions of the commission, why did you suddenly decide to recall the “Estuary” and the cattle truck? Operate with facts or slop info agency "Unian"? Or is it so convenient for you?
                    - Professor, if there had been real damage, then we would have talked about violating the International Rules for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea. Or did I watch the Americans stumble into court? And even if a real international trial had begun there, the big question is who would be really to blame. The truth is somewhere near. It is so?
                    1. Professor
                      Professor 12 January 2020 09: 08 New
                      • 3
                      • 4
                      -1
                      Quote: Shooter22
                      - Once again: Which ram? Wake watched? Do you really think that at the helm of a Russian ship, who decided in neutral waters to thus bring himself to the pantheon of glory? Professor, right you do sophistry.

                      -Nothing else can be explained to the commander’s irresponsible behavior.
                      - I won’t throw a link (about rubbish) since during my service on the Red Banner Black Sea Fleet there was no Internet and cell phones either, but you could get a camera on board at the most ...
                      -Liman drowned from a collision with a cattle truck. This is a medical fact. The findings of the commission are strangely classified.
                      - Almost an accident is already an accident and a violation of the contract of 1972 took place. video evidence of this. To sue Russia is a waste of time. Every now and then tourists spike, then they relax on their net.
                      1. Shooter22
                        Shooter22 12 January 2020 14: 34 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Smiled! ))) Thanks for the discussion Professor. hi
            2. tihonmarine
              tihonmarine 11 January 2020 19: 54 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Quote: Shooter22
              The commander of a military ship, in the first place, must comply with the orders of the command.

              You are right here. But! The warship must carry the St. Andrew flag, and the ship "Ivan Khurs" carries the State flag of Russia. Therefore, he must abide by all the rules for civil courts. Although the incident between the American destroyer and the Russian ship is simply sucked from the finger. Normal daily work, and what kind of violations there, but they simply do not exist. Pass yourself at least once from Middle-earth through the Dardanelles, the Bosphorus to the Black Sea, or from Drogden to Biscay, and then you will understand.
              1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 02: 21 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                "Ivan Khurs" is a ship of the Russian Navy and carries the St. Andrew’s flag, the flag of the Russian Navy. Take a closer look.
                We do not know what task was assigned to the commander of our ship.
                MPPSS they, for all ships and ships are the same in international (neutral) waters.
                It is only in our own waters that we can establish areas where there are some special priorities for naval ships.
                1. tihonmarine
                  tihonmarine 13 January 2020 08: 52 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Quote: ALEKSANDR KUTS
                  "Ivan Khurs" is a ship of the Russian Navy and carries the St. Andrew’s flag, the flag of the Russian Navy. Take a closer look.

                  Looked closely, and now look at the stern of "Ivan Hurs"
                  1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                    ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 17: 19 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Oh ....... how everything is started), the presented photo is when the ship has not yet been handed over to the Navy, is located at the construction wall of the plant, before the transfer of the Navy, all ships carry the State Flag. When the ship is accepted by the Navy, the St. Andrew’s flag, the flag of the Russian Navy, flies.
                    If you look closely, the video shows that the flag of St. Andrew is developing on the ship’s gaffel.
          3. ALEKSANDR KUTS
            ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 17: 29 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            What rubbish ... The 50s are long gone) ..... Forgive me, I read the latest International Conventions on the environment (pollution prevention ....), I recommend reading it.
  • Grits
    Grits 11 January 2020 06: 18 New
    • 9
    • 2
    +7
    Well, think of it, the Americans confused the right and left sides. It happens. They are excusable.
    1. Victor_B
      Victor_B 11 January 2020 06: 29 New
      • 11
      • 2
      +9
      Quote: Gritsa
      Well, think of it, the Americans confused the right and left sides. It happens. They are excusable.

      I recall the dialogue of an aircraft carrier with a lighthouse.
      Well, EVERYONE is obliged to give way to American ships!
      And do not care about MPPSS (international rules for the divergence of ships) in which English is numbered according to the number - skip the RIGHT INTERFERENCE!
  • Hto tama
    Hto tama 11 January 2020 06: 19 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    Arctic fox crept up not noticeably, which is interesting, from the stern laughing The captain of the Amer ship climbed for validol, the crew for pens, write statements crying
    1. tihonmarine
      tihonmarine 11 January 2020 20: 16 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: hto tama
      The captain of the Amer ship climbed for validol, the crew for pens, write statements

      Well, humor is one of the constituents of sailors. But I often had to meet with American ships in Gibraltar, and in the Mediterranean and in the states. I will not praise, or pour mud on them, but their service on the bridge is on top. They always call in advance, stipulate the divergence of the courts, if they need something, they just ask if you can turn away or turn off the course. I have never noticed rudeness from them. And they try to walk if several ships go, away from the tracks with heavy traffic. They pass through the straits, like all ships, without any show off. They transmit any passage of straits by a large group in advance on NAVIPs, and they also constantly warn on VHF channel 16. Normal work, ordinary sailors. Sorry if someone didn’t like my comment.
  • Kibl
    Kibl 11 January 2020 06: 25 New
    • 6
    • 10
    -4
    They were sprayed with all the crew, the destroyer stayed afloat only because they not only inflated but put it in their pants. And this substance gives increased buoyancy, because it does not sink ....
  • andrewkor
    andrewkor 11 January 2020 06: 52 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    At VO, on this occasion, they advised me to read "Charlie, Charlie, Bravo." I found out a lot of interesting things for myself, because it’s not at all moroman!
  • Sergei 23
    Sergei 23 11 January 2020 07: 00 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Video test!
    When viewing, I was not comfortable.
  • A hundred
    A hundred 11 January 2020 07: 06 New
    • 12
    • 16
    -4
    Yes, here it is no longer necessary to get closer, but to ram as in the days of the USSR! Insolent generally bastards ..
    1. Vladimir_2U
      Vladimir_2U 11 January 2020 07: 20 New
      • 13
      • 4
      +9
      In international waters ?! You do not lose sense of proportion.
      1. A hundred
        A hundred 11 January 2020 07: 22 New
        • 6
        • 16
        -10
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        In international waters ?! You do not lose sense of proportion.

        Why are they afraid to ram and apologize a couple of times? Supposedly the captain was drunk and in general it was an accident .. I think that only this will affect them .. negative
    2. Serg65
      Serg65 11 January 2020 07: 39 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Quote: Hundred
      ram like in Soviet times!

      And his saber, saber !!!!
      1. A hundred
        A hundred 11 January 2020 07: 41 New
        • 7
        • 10
        -3
        Quote: Serg65
        Quote: Hundred
        ram like in Soviet times!

        And his saber, saber !!!!

        Yes, even if so ... And then we are forever in Russia "No matter how you offend anyone and wipe ourselves with bloody snot .."
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 11 January 2020 07: 47 New
          • 14
          • 0
          +14
          Quote: Hundred
          And then we are forever in Russia

          And think with your head as it is not comme il faut? The destroyer guards his aircraft carrier - this is his job! SRZK need to get into the AUG order is his job! If the commander of the SRZK would ram the destroyer, then what kind of reconnaissance officer is he after that? Such scouts must be driven out of intelligence by a pissing broom! That's why Vital is not a scout! wink
          1. A hundred
            A hundred 11 January 2020 07: 59 New
            • 6
            • 6
            0
            Quote: Serg65
            If the commander of the SRZK would ram the destroyer, then what kind of reconnaissance officer is he after that?

            Well, in some situations, this needs to be done .. After all, the US Navy is laughing at us ..
            Quote: Serg65
            Such scouts must be driven out of intelligence by a pissing broom! That's why Vital is not a scout!

            Then you’re right, the scout and Stirlitz are none of me, they immediately calculate by handwriting .. laughing And I’m not particularly upset hi
            1. Serg65
              Serg65 11 January 2020 08: 05 New
              • 8
              • 0
              +8
              Quote: Hundred
              Well in some situations, this needs to be done

              In some, yes ... I agree! For example, if you violate the state border!
              Quote: Hundred
              immediately calculated by handwriting.

              laughing Vitaly, how not to recognize the VO legend? With past you drinks
          2. aleks26
            aleks26 11 January 2020 11: 37 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Serg65
            SRZK need to get into the AUG order is his job! If the commander of the SRZK would ram the destroyer, then what kind of reconnaissance officer is he after that?

            So he did not ram. And yet he got into the warrant, he didn’t change course, missed the destroyer under his nose, and then went on to where he was going.
            1. Serg65
              Serg65 11 January 2020 11: 41 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Quote: aleks26
              So he didn’t ram

              what Actually, my answer was to these words ..
              Quote: Hundred
              Why are you afraid to ram and apologize a couple of times? Supposedly the captain was drunk

              Quote: aleks26
              and further popper where he went.

              So he has already come where he was going, why continue to shove? wink
          3. ALEKSANDR KUTS
            ALEKSANDR KUTS 11 January 2020 12: 30 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Are you up to date with our ship? Maybe this is the task, such as a little "fix" the order. By the way, we didn’t see either the warrant or the AB itself, in what distance was it?
            Or maybe our ship was carrying out the task of diverting security forces to itself? And even the task could complicate the maneuver of the order.
            In the service of ships, different tasks are set, depending on the situation. The reconnaissance ship, this did not necessarily overhear, peeped and that was it. This is a combat unit, and as it will, if necessary, it will ram and even in international waters. Which, by the way, happened.
            1. Serg65
              Serg65 11 January 2020 12: 59 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              Quote: ALEKSANDR KUTS
              Are you in the know

              In the know of what? In the know about your fantasies?
              Quote: ALEKSANDR KUTS
              Maybe this is the task, such as a little "fix" the order

              I’m sorry, you weren’t an admiral in a past life?
              Quote: ALEKSANDR KUTS
              Which, by the way, happened.

              Can you give an example when RK went to ram ... just like that, from nefig do ???
              1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
                ALEKSANDR KUTS 13 January 2020 02: 35 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                What fantasies .... this is life)

                And I didn’t assure what exactly which CERs were ramming ...... But the tug, providing the reception of the spacecraft in the Pacific Ocean in the group of ships of the KIK, made dangerous maneuvers with respect to the adversary, not allowing him to the landing site .... And if it was required, even directly, if it hadn’t rammed, the bulk would have been made unambiguously.
            2. Looking for
              Looking for 11 January 2020 16: 22 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              but as it sounds, ORDER!
  • bald
    bald 11 January 2020 07: 12 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Well done guys, you are there, by the way, although by the way, although there is no control over the pirates, there is no Somali control.
  • bald
    bald 11 January 2020 07: 23 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Question
    to diesel engineers, how do engines relate to them
    .
  • sagitch
    sagitch 11 January 2020 07: 27 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    At the end of the video plot it can be seen that the American “stern” towards the side still took away. Point squeezed.
  • tlauicol
    tlauicol 11 January 2020 07: 29 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    then the Iranians admitted that they shot down a plane, and you just write about Hurs. Website responsiveness is low
    1. kepmor
      kepmor 11 January 2020 07: 39 New
      • 5
      • 14
      -9
      Well, everything fell into place ...
      neither CIA agents, nor Ukrainian pilots ... everything is much simpler ... as stupid as their Syrian counterparts, who failed our IL-20 ...
      interesting, but nothing Jewish flied near ???? ... otherwise it was somehow "non-kamlfo" for the idiots ...
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 11 January 2020 07: 36 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    "Hero", prickly hedgehogs! If the vessel was of equal class, the mattress covers would go half bent. And then why not heroic? Jackals!
  • rocket757
    rocket757 11 January 2020 08: 13 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Question, and the rules can’t be observed After all, they are, these rules.
    There are enough psychos everywhere .... the rules are written for that, so that critical incidents do not occur.
    1. ALEKSANDR KUTS
      ALEKSANDR KUTS 11 January 2020 12: 38 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well, actually the American then violated these very rules and violated them. Why the universal cry of the 5th US fleet?
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 11 January 2020 12: 49 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        There are enough psychos / exceptional among them ... they will also give a medal for greyhound.
  • 2 Level Advisor
    2 Level Advisor 11 January 2020 08: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Not so long ago there was an absolutely identical topic: Merikos was fulfilling an order to protect the AUG — crushing ours from the course to the center of the warrant, ours insisted that he didn’t go according to civil rules .. regular service, ours, not ours ..
  • Adimius38
    Adimius38 11 January 2020 08: 27 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    the trail shows who was walking, the American insolently cut the course of the Russian ship on the right
  • Adimius38
    Adimius38 11 January 2020 08: 29 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    for every American sailor on one leg of hay on another straw, so that they learn to recognize where right is where left
  • Karaul14
    Karaul14 11 January 2020 08: 50 New
    • 5
    • 10
    -5
    This is called an inferiority complex. Previously, the USSR fleet was deservedly formidable and respected in the world. And what is the Russian fleet compared to the US Navy, especially far from the coast? Such maneuvers are done only with the aim of somehow attracting attention.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Adimius38
    Adimius38 11 January 2020 09: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    of displacement, of course, the destroyer was three times superior to our boat, that's why courage full pants at amers
  • svp67
    svp67 11 January 2020 09: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The Convention on the International Rules for Preventing Collisions at Sea of ​​1972, Rule No. 15 (“Situation of Course Crossing), defines:
    What conventions, when the "Russian" behaves so "brazenly", you see, you decided to follow the American aircraft carrier ...
  • igorlvov
    igorlvov 11 January 2020 10: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    remembered
  • PCF
    PCF 11 January 2020 16: 58 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    An excellent reason for the information war, (at first I wanted to write to throw shit on a fan), I will explain my idea. Now I am in Germany and the Germans on all radio news, probably on TV, but I don’t watch it, they are talking like people wound up about the aggressive approach of the Russian ship to the sacred boat under the striped flag.
    Full compliance with the settings of the Washington Regional Committee.
    When asked one more or less adequate German about the COLREGs, they were the same MPPSS and what the hell the Americans broke they heard a miserable bleating about the aggressive Russian.
    The brains are washed there so that Mozha Goebbels smiles happily
  • eklmn
    eklmn 11 January 2020 17: 12 New
    • 1
    • 6
    -5
    I think that this situation arose due to the lack of smoke.
    After all, how is the Russian squadron going? If the aircraft carrier - then smokes. If not an aircraft carrier (and all Russian squadrons go with their own tug and fuel truck, then there are no bases!), Then these two are smoked. Or one of them. Those. - The squadron passage is visible from space, and the Americans are not approaching it. Yes, and why? But the Amer squadron is moving fast, but low and quiet, tiptoe. Here the Russian intelligence officer did not understand that the Amer ship is a cover ship - nothing was visible / heard and started these cats / mice. Well, the Americans, as always, laughed and forgave - well, what do you take with ...
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 11 January 2020 17: 36 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: eklmn
      this situation arose due to the lack of smoke.

      Commentary do not understand anyone, arising from a lack of brain. yes
  • Rzzz
    Rzzz 11 January 2020 22: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There is no crossing situation here, rule 15 is not applicable here.
    But they came close by marine standards. It’s uncomfortable for me, even with my river experience, and it’s probably terrible for pure sailors.
  • Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 13 January 2020 08: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: ALEKSANDR KUTS
    Actually, there is one more thing in the protection of the AB - there should be two submarines, but they were apparently modestly silent about them).


    It could well be that Hurst worked precisely on the submarine, and the destroyer carefully interfered.
  • Ax Matt
    Ax Matt 13 January 2020 17: 10 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Farragut is a relatively new (2006) destroyer. “Ivan Khurs” most likely shot fields on a working order. And then "a flock of birds flew and dripped from the eyelashes" laughing and someone again will massively write a report on the descent to the shore ... Keep it up, sailors!