Missile attacks on US bases hit the video

Missile attacks on US bases hit the video

Details of the attack carried out by Tehran on American military bases in Iraq appear.


According to information voiced by Newsweek, cruise missiles and short-range ballistic missiles were used as weapons. As can be judged by the published materials, it is likely that Soviet-made liquid single-stage R-17s (according to NATO classification - “Scud”) or their Iranian counterparts or more advanced modifications of local development were used. Data on the use of the new Qiam-1 and Zolfaghar ballistic missiles is provided.




They are uploading to the network and video materials that display the action of retaliation, which received the official name “Martyr Suleimani”. They were posted by both the Iranian news agency FarsNews and eyewitnesses of the events.

The rocket attack began at 1:30 local time (similar to Moscow time). According to the Pentagon, there are no casualties among US troops, however, material damage is estimated. A total of thirteen missiles were fired at two United States sites in Iraq.

Tehran announces the possibility of striking at Washington’s allies. First of all, apparently, it means Israel. The IDF has already brought its armed forces to full alert.


Photos used:
https://twitter.com/FarsNews_Agency
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

95 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Victor_B 8 January 2020 05: 30 New
    • 11
    • 10
    +1
    Tehran announces the possibility of striking at Washington’s allies. First of all, apparently, it means Israel. The IDF has already brought its armed forces to full alert.

    Israel cannot pass by!
    It will strike itself. Preventively.
    1. Russian Moldavian 8 January 2020 05: 39 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      The Iraqi People’s Mobilization Forces (SNM), also known as Khashd al-Shaabi, launched a major operation against the US military in Iraq, Iranian Press TV reported.

      "The Popular Mobilization Force's anti-terrorist group, better known as the Hashd al-Shaabi forces, has announced the start of a crushing retaliatory operation against the United States," the report said.

      The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has reportedly launched rocket attacks on the Ain al-Assad US air base in Anbar province in western Iraq.
    2. Same lech 8 January 2020 05: 54 New
      • 20
      • 5
      +15
      It will strike itself. Preventively.

      Yah belay Jews won't get into a fight until the last ... so it's better to sit on the sidelines and watch Uncle Sam butting with the Iranians.
      1. Demon_is_ada 8 January 2020 06: 44 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        In this case, this is the best way out for them, and rocket frames are pretty much stacked by frame ...
        1. kjhg 8 January 2020 07: 29 New
          • 12
          • 3
          +9
          Quote: Demon_is_ada
          the missiles go pretty heap ...

          There is no doubt that these missiles were launched not to destroy as many of the American military as possible, but to intimidate them in order to squeeze the Americans out of Iraq as soon as possible. Trump now has an iron motive in order to withdraw troops from Iraq, but at the same time not to respond to the shelling, because none of the military were injured. As the saying goes, both the wolves are fed and the sheep are intact.
          1. alexmach 8 January 2020 10: 42 New
            • 1
            • 3
            -2
            but do not respond to shelling

            Do not respond to shelling? Oh well. Weakly somehow believed. For this, the bombers apparently moved closer to Iran.
          2. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 08: 44 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: kjhg
            and for intimidation with the goal of speeding out the Americans from Iraq.

            but did not meet the information on the damaged infrastructure?
            1. kjhg 9 January 2020 11: 07 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Here is a photo of the affected objects and turntables standing nearby
              https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/5551325.html
      2. Grits 8 January 2020 06: 57 New
        • 7
        • 2
        +5
        Quote: The same Lech
        so it’s better to sit on the sidelines and watch Uncle Sam butting with the Iranians.

        That Israel, that Iran is now profitable not to bully each other-will cost more. And look at the side of the party - so there was an unspoken struggle between the USA and Israel - who will fight and who will watch from the side. And each other pushed for this. While the Jews seem smarter.
      3. Udav kaa 8 January 2020 08: 47 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: The same Lech
        Oh well, belay Jews will not get into a fight until the last ..

        On the sly they will wet, they will not miss their ..
      4. Chaldon48 8 January 2020 11: 38 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Iran borders on Russia, I'm afraid to sit aside, in the event of a full-blown conflict, it will not succeed.
        1. Vadim237 8 January 2020 12: 00 New
          • 3
          • 4
          -1
          Where does Iran border Russia?
          1. aybolyt678 9 January 2020 08: 45 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Vadim237
            Where does Iran border Russia?

            on the Caspian Sea
    3. Grits 8 January 2020 06: 54 New
      • 7
      • 2
      +5
      Quote: Victor_B
      It will strike itself. Preventively.

      I think Jews can even hit nuclear weapons. When they need, they forget about morality. And they motivate us with the fact that, they say, we had the right to self-defense, we are a small country and blah blah blah. But it would be better to abstain altogether
      1. atalef 8 January 2020 06: 56 New
        • 2
        • 10
        -8
        Quote: Gritsa
        I think Jews can even hit nuclear weapons. When they need, they forget about morality.

        Well, it won’t come to that, I think.
        But nevertheless, it means Iran to strike at Israel in response to the states - it’s highly moral, but for us to defend ourselves in any way possible - no
        1. Flooding 8 January 2020 08: 27 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Quote: atalef
          But nevertheless, it means Iran to strike at Israel in response to the states - it’s highly moral, but for us to defend ourselves in any way possible - no

          All possible methods should be adequate.
          You do not know how Iran with bacteriological weapons?
          1. Voyager 8 January 2020 19: 21 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Many Iranians dream of destroying the whole of Israel. Do not leave stone from stone. So that...
    4. Thrifty 8 January 2020 07: 06 New
      • 16
      • 1
      +15
      And what is there about the Yankisian vaunted patriots, out of 30 launched Iranian missiles shot down all 50? ?? lol
    5. Vol4ara 8 January 2020 08: 58 New
      • 19
      • 0
      +19
      And Iran has titanium eggs, did not expect
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. Xnumx vis 8 January 2020 10: 08 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: Victor_B
      Tehran announces the possibility of striking at Washington’s allies. First of all, apparently, it means Israel. The IDF has already brought its armed forces to full alert.

      Israel cannot pass by!
      It will strike itself. Preventively.

      Feel free to go into battle and stand with your breasts behind your backs!
    8. Nyrobsky 8 January 2020 12: 12 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Victor_B
      Israel cannot pass by!
      It will strike itself. Preventively.

      Preventively, this is unlikely. If only in response. Now everyone will pause and observe the exchange of "courtesies" between the US and Iran, in the hope that everything will be limited to a few blows. no one wants a full-scale war, and at the same time they understand that Iran could not leave the American "prank" unanswered.
  2. Sergey Ui 8 January 2020 05: 33 New
    • 16
    • 1
    +15
    Several planes are damaged, amers have some kind of air defense
    1. Graz 8 January 2020 05: 34 New
      • 18
      • 2
      +16
      Yes, they have no air defense, one advertisement
      1. Sergei 23 8 January 2020 06: 05 New
        • 26
        • 1
        +25
        Let us now look at Iran’s air defense. In the coming hours, I think it will be tested in full.
      2. Grits 8 January 2020 06: 59 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        Quote: Graz
        Yes, they have no air defense, one advertisement

        It seems that the entire defense of American bases is concrete walls, sandbags and machine guns on the towers. About air defense as it was recklessly forgotten.
      3. Victor_B 8 January 2020 07: 14 New
        • 8
        • 2
        +6
        Quote: Graz
        Yes, they have no air defense,

        Land. Object.
        They have relied on aviation for air defense.
        These bases, as I understand it, are not protected by any Patriots. From the word - in general.
        1. Sergej1972 8 January 2020 11: 18 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          And in Soviet times, they wrote that in the United States air defense aircraft had practically not existed since the 70s. They wrote that the entire territory of the United States accounted for only 50 interceptor fighters.
      4. Vadim237 8 January 2020 12: 01 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        For example, the one that the recent American high-altitude Global Hawk shot down.
    2. maidan.izrailovich 8 January 2020 05: 39 New
      • 28
      • 0
      +28
      .... Amer's air defense is some kind of gift

      The hegemon is not used to being bombed and fired. Probably have to get used to it.
  3. However, dear 8 January 2020 05: 39 New
    • 4
    • 28
    -24
    Dashing trouble is the beginning ... of the end of Ayatollah’s reign.
    1. Same lech 8 January 2020 05: 55 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Something long this end comes.
      1. However, dear 8 January 2020 05: 59 New
        • 1
        • 23
        -22
        If they have enough "intelligence" to run into Israel, then they will be burned even faster ...
        1. Same lech 8 January 2020 06: 01 New
          • 13
          • 0
          +13
          Not enough ... Israel itself took a reasonable position without interfering in this conflict ... as always, cunning guys expect to sit behind the stupid Uncle Sam.
          1. However, dear 8 January 2020 06: 07 New
            • 1
            • 11
            -10
            I was just in Israel when Saddam fired at him with Skads. Then the Americans asked Israel not to intervene so as not to destroy the anti-Iraq coalition. Now there is no coalition. If the ayatollahs attack, Israel will no longer stay.
            1. Same lech 8 January 2020 06: 09 New
              • 4
              • 0
              +4
              If the ayatollahs attack, Israel will no longer stay.

              The fact of the matter is that if ... one big thing if ... I don’t think that the ayatollahs, despite their rhetoric, are so stupid as to receive another front of the war.
              1. However, dear 8 January 2020 06: 13 New
                • 3
                • 19
                -16
                I also thought that the Ayatollahs are smarter: they curse the popularly bad Merikos and calm down. But no - they attacked.
                1. Same lech 8 January 2020 06: 15 New
                  • 16
                  • 0
                  +16
                  I also thought that the Ayatollahs are smarter: they curse the popularly bad Merikos and calm down. But no - they attacked.

                  A man said ... a man did ... the Iranians kept their word to take revenge on the United States ... at least a little revenge.
                  Unlike the leaders of the United States ... hehe heh gave the word they took the word ... real macho.
                  1. However, dear 8 January 2020 06: 17 New
                    • 4
                    • 4
                    0
                    Yes, now we’ll see what the director’s intention was. :))
              2. atalef 8 January 2020 06: 57 New
                • 0
                • 6
                -6
                Quote: The same Lech
                If the ayatollahs attack, Israel will no longer stay.

                The fact of the matter is that if ... one big thing if ... I don’t think that the ayatollahs, despite their rhetoric, are so stupid as to receive another front of the war.

                Of course they will. Hezbollah in Lebanon.
                End to Lebanon.
                1. However, dear 8 January 2020 08: 16 New
                  • 4
                  • 2
                  +2
                  Listening to CNN now. Until they found the dead Americans or Iraqis at these bases. There was a warning of a missile attack, and base personnel took refuge in shelters. Trump will perform in America tomorrow morning. Probably, if there are no dead and Iran does not continue, then the war is canceled.
                  1. Vol4ara 8 January 2020 09: 11 New
                    • 2
                    • 1
                    +1
                    Quote: However, dear
                    Listening to CNN now. Until they found the dead Americans or Iraqis at these bases. There was a warning of a missile attack, and base personnel took refuge in shelters. Trump will perform in America tomorrow morning. Probably, if there are no dead and Iran does not continue, then the war is canceled.

                    CNN is it fake news? Well, an American television channel ... if they had hit a base with nuclear weapons, would they also say that the staff took refuge? Missile attack warning from whom? from what means of air defense, and why were these funds silent if they were? If Trump doesn’t answer, then his campaign company is crap
                    1. However, dear 9 January 2020 00: 53 New
                      • 1
                      • 2
                      -1
                      Well, a fake is not a fake, but it turned out that there is no war, but there will still be sanctions.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
                    1. However, dear 9 January 2020 04: 18 New
                      • 1
                      • 2
                      -1
                      This time, it seems, the conflict with Suleimani ended, did not lie to CNN, in general. And although war is still possible, but not in the near future. However, they have been talking about the war between Iran and the United States for 40 years, since they took hostages at the American embassy.
            2. Gray-haired 8 January 2020 10: 09 New
              • 7
              • 0
              +7
              "I was just in Israel" I hesitate to ask: Did you go home? repeat
              1. However, dear 9 January 2020 00: 54 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Do not be shy. Ask. I lived in Israel from 1990 to 2002.
  4. seregin-s1 8 January 2020 05: 39 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    When they bombard Damascus, both arrivals and air defense missiles are visible. There are only arrivals. Where is the air defense?
    1. Blackmokona 8 January 2020 05: 41 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Judging by the fact that there are no victims, not a single hit in something valuable
      1. seregin-s1 8 January 2020 05: 46 New
        • 10
        • 0
        +10
        And judging by the video, they go to heap. And as for the victims, this is understandable. Who at the very beginning of the war will say that the strikes reached their goal, and even at night.
        1. lucul 8 January 2020 05: 53 New
          • 0
          • 18
          -18
          And judging by the video, they go to heap

          All the world's media are silent, so another fake.
          1. Vol4ara 8 January 2020 09: 13 New
            • 3
            • 0
            +3
            Quote: lucul
            And judging by the video, they go to heap

            All the world's media are silent, so another fake.

            Forgot to add a civilized, although this word in relation to Western countries can already be quoted. "civilized"
      2. maidan.izrailovich 8 January 2020 05: 46 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9
        Blackmokona
        Judging by the fact that there are no victims ...

        Did you determine this from the photo and video, or did Trump personally report to you?
        Americans really do not like to admit their losses. And if they recognize, they always underestimate.
        1. Grits 8 January 2020 07: 06 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: maidan.izrailovich
          Americans really do not like to admit their losses. And if they recognize, they always underestimate.

          So it is still not known what is better - there are losses among the Americans or not. If so, then Trump has no way back.
      3. Cobalt 8 January 2020 05: 48 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: BlackMokona
        Judging by the fact that there are no victims, not a single hit in something valuable

        The important thing here is not getting into something valuable, but the fact of the strike, first an attack on the base, then a missile strike, then an interesting one in front (an analogue of the twin towers), the spiral is just starting to unwind
        1. maidan.izrailovich 8 January 2020 05: 52 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          ... further - interesting ahead (analogue of twin towers), ...

          That is, the Americans will destroy the Pentagon building and the White House in the trash? And they will say to the whole world that Iran has done this “evil”?
          But....
          1. Cobalt 8 January 2020 05: 57 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Do you really think that 11 were made by American intelligence agencies? I think not. The people in America are multinational, there is such a rule “nothing personal, just business,” that is, money is ruled, not patriotism, so for any 100 thousand dollars there any American “patriot” will sell his government and his people.
            1. seregin-s1 8 January 2020 06: 03 New
              • 10
              • 0
              +10
              And why next to the "twins" the third tower collapsed?
              1. Thunderbolt 8 January 2020 06: 25 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                Quote: maidan.izrailovich
                Americans really do not like to admit their losses. And if they recognize, they always underestimate.

                Then maybe you can name some country that loves to admit its losses? And always overestimates them.
              2. Piramidon 8 January 2020 09: 12 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: seregin-s1
                And why next to the "twins" the third tower collapsed?

                Yes, and the Pentagon is somehow muddy. No debris was found.
          2. dvina71 8 January 2020 09: 41 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: maidan.izrailovich
            But....

            You poorly know the history of American wars .. In order to justify the war, they did not spare both single ships and entire bases ..
    2. Grits 8 January 2020 07: 04 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: seregin-s1
      When they bombard Damascus, both arrivals and air defense missiles are visible. There are only arrivals. Where is the air defense?

      belay What kind of air defense? And why is it at the base or US airfield? Who dares to shell the great elves?
    3. Piramidon 8 January 2020 09: 17 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: seregin-s1
      Where is the air defense?

      They write that the personnel of the base leaked into shelters. There was no one to control the air defense, even if it was available.
  5. Antidote 8 January 2020 05: 42 New
    • 0
    • 5
    -5
    Launching rockets "somewhere there" is a so-so perspective. IMHO.
  6. Mountain shooter 8 January 2020 05: 44 New
    • 5
    • 4
    +1
    It’s very bad ... And the fact that the funeral themselves resulted in a tragedy with the mass of dead people ... And the fact that they struck, but the result is rather obscure. And nothing but an excuse to start a massive bombing of Iran, will not give ... Somehow "ostentatious" everything. Like in Indian cinema ...
  7. Zaurbek 8 January 2020 05: 44 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Somehow they shoot obliquely. Maybe missiles detected missile defense and everyone hid?
    1. Non liberoid Russian 8 January 2020 05: 49 New
      • 0
      • 6
      -6
      start it directly, just with a quo they have a couple of hundred kilometers ... from Persian missiles
      1. Zaurbek 8 January 2020 05: 52 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Well, from 13pcs with a quo of 150m, something should get into the base. And bch there under 500kg
        1. Blackmokona 8 January 2020 05: 57 New
          • 1
          • 2
          -1
          The Soviets have such a QUO, while the Iranians can have orders of magnitude more
    2. Vladimir_2U 8 January 2020 05: 52 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I read about a couple of "muddy" bases in Europe, there rocket and artillery were worked out strictly and often there! anxiety. So the Americans, with timely notification of a raid, may well take refuge.
  8. However, dear 8 January 2020 05: 53 New
    • 1
    • 9
    -8
    US airlines banned flights over Iraq and Iran.

    https://www.golos-ameriki.ru/a/faa-bans-flights-iran/5236498.html

    We stock up on popcorn. The shooting of Iraq by the ayatollah taught nothing.
    1. Vol4ara 8 January 2020 09: 16 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: However, dear
      US airlines banned flights over Iraq and Iran.

      https://www.golos-ameriki.ru/a/faa-bans-flights-iran/5236498.html

      We stock up on popcorn. The shooting of Iraq by the ayatollah taught nothing.

      I hope you are outside Israel, then I would advise you to stock up on stew
  9. lucul 8 January 2020 05: 59 New
    • 2
    • 6
    -4
    Delete the fake - otherwise it will throw on Yandex Zen - get the status of the yellow press.
  10. Hwostatij 8 January 2020 06: 04 New
    • 1
    • 3
    -2
    Oil in the morning, I think, over a hundred parts - a good present for all of us for Christmas)
    1. Vadim237 8 January 2020 12: 04 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      A little over 70 dollars - for a hundredths she will pass when the first tanker hits a sea mine.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. Cobalt 8 January 2020 06: 09 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: seregin-s1
    And why next to the "twins" the third tower collapsed?

    Investigation of why it collapsed there is now uninteresting (long ago, the USA dominated the world, there were few opponents, etc., etc.), the situation is interesting now, how they will leave (many interesting factors)
  13. Arthur 85 8 January 2020 06: 11 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Damn, I wanted a peaceful sky, but to see, my dreams were not destined to come true ... star-striped provocateurs.
  14. Amateur 8 January 2020 06: 24 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    short-range ballistic missiles.

    Is this a new type of weapon or a new type of Russian language?
    1. Zaurbek 8 January 2020 06: 33 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Google Translate
      1. Amateur 8 January 2020 06: 36 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        There used to be pidgin English, and recently they are trying to introduce Google rush at VO. belay
    2. However, dear 8 January 2020 06: 35 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      This is when the author is too lazy to translate, but includes a Google translator. laughing
  15. georggy 8 January 2020 08: 29 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well done.
    Keep it up.
  16. svp67 8 January 2020 08: 46 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It is interesting to look at the results, how many misses? And the first video looks very much like air defense missile launches ...
  17. K-50 8 January 2020 09: 24 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    They raised a “hornet’s nest” to murder no one needed except Jews, now they will consider the losses.
    Question: did you need it in fig? Cave in front of the Jewish lobby and question the victory in the upcoming presidential election?
    Or is the Jews so trumped by Trump that they were forced to do so? what
  18. Chingachguk 8 January 2020 09: 54 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    They will shoot in the desert and claim that they launched a missile strike on Israel! And Israel will not understand that it was shot at him. Two gophers in the desert may be affected, and then only vryatly. Is it now so responsible for the murder of their military generals? At the funeral, more was injured than a missile strike in retaliation! Both laughter and sin.
  19. shark 8 January 2020 10: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    It looks like an agreement. What a ridiculous attack. The number of missiles launched is obviously small for a crushing blow. Not a single amer died. What we have in total- A couple of craters, a burned plane, Iran saved the face of a man with titanium eggs, Trump saved his face and (type) brought out from under the blow of US citizens. All in its own way. And only the Iranian general is dead. By the way, the question arose: who is following Iran? Tell me, was Iran’s top leadership bothered by the general’s increased influence? Then everything will fall into its holes.
  20. mlad 8 January 2020 10: 48 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    A strike at the airbase showed that Iran would be able to disable the base in case of conflict, the United States wanted to transfer B52 there
    1. Dima_Anlim 8 January 2020 12: 20 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Iran has shown that its missiles are not accurate and are at the level of the ancient Iraqi Scuds flying anywhere. And that Iran clearly does not want a big war with the United States. That's all.
      1. mlad 8 January 2020 12: 40 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        I think that the accuracy of these missiles is not great, although we do not know this, but the accuracy of the missiles would be enough to not catch the Americans. otherwise the tomahawks would have beaten in Tehran
  21. Dima_Anlim 8 January 2020 12: 18 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    In short, they shot anywhere, just not to hurt the Americans. Abrupt action of "retaliation" ... A lot of noise because of nothing.
    1. shark 8 January 2020 12: 37 New
      • 0
      • 1
      -1
      well, it’s not theirs, to shoot rockets ... Some sort of bus to blow up or a plane, preferably a civilian ... These are their methods. But they do not know how to seriously fight. Yes, and how can you seriously fight with interruptions in prayer)) In a guerrilla war, but on its territory - yes. In this they are masters. Enough to remember Afghanistan. (I mean not specifically the Iranians, but all the peoples in the region) So, we ran, made some noise, threatened the sky with our fists, we don’t know where the pipe was launched and that's all. There will be nothing more ...
  22. Old26 8 January 2020 12: 27 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Russian Moldovans
    The Iraqi People’s Mobilization Forces (SNM), also known as Khashd al-Shaabi, launched a major operation against the US military in Iraq, Iranian Press TV reported.

    "The Popular Mobilization Force's anti-terrorist group, better known as the Hashd al-Shaabi forces, has announced the start of a crushing retaliatory operation against the United States," the report said.

    The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) has reportedly launched rocket attacks on the Ain al-Assad US air base in Anbar province in western Iraq.

    I don’t know how the fighting is there, but propaganda has already begun. You listen to the Iranian media, they have already launched almost 40-60 missiles. The number of dead Americans is approaching 100, the number of aircraft destroyed can no longer be counted on the fingers ...

    Quote: Thrifty
    And what is there about the Yankisian vaunted patriots, out of 30 launched Iranian missiles shot down all 50? ?? lol

    But what a comrade trifle. Write like the Persians that launched 60 rockets ...

    Quote: Antidote
    Launching rockets "somewhere there" is a so-so perspective. IMHO.

    Well, they didn’t let them go somewhere, but for specific purposes. True, not everyone flew according to the latest information.

    Quote: Zaurbek
    Well, from 13pcs with a quo of 150m, something should get into the base. And bch there under 500kg

    In fact, according to the latest data on the Ain al-Assad airbase, 10 missiles were fired in two volleys, 1 missile on Erbil, 4 more missiles did not reach the target. Only 15 missiles. Type of missile used - Fateh-313. Firing range - up to 500 km. According to various estimates, the weight of the warhead is from 450 to 600 kg (the first figure is more likely). The CVO of this model is about 0,1-0,15% of the range, that is, the CVO of the order of 500-750 meters ...

    Quote: Hwostatij
    Oil in the morning, I think, over a hundred parts - a good present for all of us for Christmas)

    If you believe the Internet, then at 11 o’clock in Moscow about 69 dollars per barrel

    Quote: Amateur
    short-range ballistic missiles.

    Is this a new type of weapon or a new type of Russian language?

    This is newspeak.
    Quote: svp67
    It is interesting to look at the results, how many misses? And the first video looks very much like air defense missile launches ...

    He wrote a little higher. According to open data, 4 did not reach the goal. Of the 15 launched. That is approximately 27% ...

    Quote: mlad
    A strike at the airbase showed that Iran would be able to disable the base in case of conflict, the United States wanted to transfer B52 there

    And they were not going to. There is Diego Garcia for this. On this base - Ain al-Assad - based on open data, helicopters, UAVs and fighters (in doubt)
  23. Maks-80 8 January 2020 15: 56 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well done! Not that some killers
    1. kupitman 9 January 2020 13: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      struck at previously abandoned bases, no one was hurt, several hangars were destroyed, well done th ...
  24. Bauer 9 January 2020 14: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And what did the calculations of the vaunted Patriot do? Still celebrating New Year?
    1. Vadim01 9 January 2020 22: 20 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You like winding likes with these "jokes"?
  25. Vadim01 9 January 2020 22: 18 New
    • 0
    • 1
    -1
    Most of the missiles launched hit the wasteland around American bases, and this is in the absence of resistance from the US missile defense. hi