Israeli media: Israel will not have to confront pro-Iranian forces alone, the US will help

265

Israel will no longer have to confront pro-Iranian forces alone, and the United States has returned to the power game in the Middle East to help, The Jerusalem Post writes.

The other day, "precision airstrikes hit several targets in Iraq and Syria, allegedly belonging to the Iranian-backed Kataib Hezbollah combat group, killing dozens of militants during the attack.



These attacks happened two days after more than thirty missiles flew into the K1 Iraqi military base in Kirkuk, killing a US civilian contractor and injuring dozens of Iraqi and American troops. The Pentagon called retaliation attacks on militants “accurate defensive strikes,” which “worsen” the ability of enemies to conduct attacks against coalition forces.

Missile fire and subsequent retaliatory strikes in the Al Qa'imah area are the latest peak of tensions between Washington and Tehran.

Both Israel and the United States constantly warn, The Jerusalem Post emphasizes that Iran and its militants are the biggest threat to peace in the region and hope to weaken Tehran’s growing influence in the Middle East in general and in the Persian Gulf in particular. However, the text says, the Americans did not respond to Iran and its related forces until a United States citizen died.
265 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    31 December 2019 13: 49
    laughing Who would doubt that. laughing laughing
    1. +8
      31 December 2019 14: 15
      - Monya, drop this kaku!
      - Mom, come on!
      - Monya, and I tell you: drop this kaku!
      - Well, mom, I’m already 50 years old and I have been living with her for 30 years, we have children.
      laughing
      1. +1
        31 December 2019 14: 24
        Quote: Finches
        - Well, mom, I’m already 50 years old and I’ve been living with her for 30 years,

        I always believed that the USSR-Israel conflict was an unfortunate mistake that the US took full advantage of.
        1. +1
          31 December 2019 14: 39
          Unfortunately, in the confrontation between Jews and Arabs, it was necessary to choose some side - the USSR chose Arabs!
          1. +1
            31 December 2019 14: 59
            Quote: Finches
            USSR needed to choose some side of the Jews or Arabs

            For a number of reasons, I dislike V Solovyov, but sometimes he, as a well-educated person, says not stupid things
            "They ask who the world will follow, Russia, China or America? The question is wrong. You can follow either God or the devil V.R.Soloviev."
            So, to paraphrase this statement, we can say, the USSR had to choose the side of truth.
            1. +1
              31 December 2019 15: 00
              At that time, the truth was for the Arabs ... Now, perhaps, again for the Arabs ...
              1. +5
                31 December 2019 15: 13
                I don’t have a drop of Jewish blood, but for some reason I always treated Israel with great respect.
                Maybe because they are in a barren desert. built a powerful state
                Maybe because there is a significant part of the Russian-speaking population
                Or maybe they reminded me when they alone stood against ten times the forces of the Arabs, as the USSR in the Second World War stood against a united Europe, under a fascist banner.
                1. +2
                  31 December 2019 15: 15
                  From the point of view of geopolitics it is necessary to reason like this - the enemy of my enemy, my friend! And our enemy and the enemy of all progressive mankind is the USA! Hence the conclusion - the countries supporting the United States are our enemies, the peoples who want the destruction of the United States, our friends!
                  1. +2
                    31 December 2019 16: 09
                    to Iraqi military base

                    Not to the Iraqi base, but to the American base in Iraq.
                    And not "rocket fire". What nafig rocket fire if there is no destruction.
                    They probably shot New Year's fireworks. They can also be killed, here is one contractor and died
                    1. D16
                      +1
                      1 January 2020 10: 59
                      They probably shot New Year's fireworks.

                      The question is who and for whose money arranged it. Seek someone profitable. lol
                  2. 0
                    31 December 2019 16: 14
                    Geopolitics of Haushofer and others like him, this is the day before yesterday. As in Marxism, there is a reasonable grain in Geopolitics, as in the Keplerian system of orbits. But science is moving forward, and now "The enemy of my enemy is another bastard"
                    1. +1
                      31 December 2019 16: 21
                      Well, here I still have a personal subjective view of things - the United States, must be wiped off the face of the earth and if Israel does not want to help in this, it means he is an enemy of Russia! Of course, these are illusions, but that’s the worst ... In the event of aggression by the United States and its NATO allies, Israel will stand on their side - therefore, Iran will be the only counterweight to Jewish aggression! This does not mean to exclude communication with Tel Aviv, but it does not mean that we should refuse to communicate with Tehran!
                      1. +2
                        31 December 2019 16: 46
                        Quote: Finches
                        - USA must be wiped off the face of the earth

                        Get hot comrade. Or the fermenter inside you hi
                        What can I say for sure, the United States is possible in a stripped-down version, will last a long time.
                      2. +3
                        31 December 2019 16: 51
                        Unfortunately yes! Will exist! But I don’t need to use something inside to wish all the fibers of the soul to destroy the USA and Great Britain !!! But the USA is unique!“I feel such a personal dislike ... that I can’t eat ...” laughing
                      3. +5
                        31 December 2019 17: 00
                        Well, in this case, your extremely grounded, and documented concept, about the fact that the Anglo-Saxon civilization exists completely unnecessarily (considering how many civilizations they have destroyed), I cannot oppose anything, and I have to completely agree with you.
                      4. +2
                        31 December 2019 17: 14
                        In any situation and my bloodthirsty desires - as a staff officer, I still wish all of us a peaceful sky overhead in the coming year, health and all the best! hi drinks
                      5. +2
                        31 December 2019 21: 58
                        Quote: Siberia 75
                        Quote: Finches
                        - USA must be wiped off the face of the earth

                        Get hot comrade. Or the fermenter inside you hi
                        What can I say for sure, the United States is possible in a stripped-down version, will last a long time.

                        truncated by the very Cardillers)))))))
                  3. 0
                    31 December 2019 18: 14
                    [quote = Zyablitsov] And our enemy and enemy all progressive humanityThis is the USA! [/ quote
                    Please announce the WHOLE list.
                  4. +3
                    31 December 2019 19: 12
                    Quote: Finches
                    peoples wanting the destruction of the United States, our friends!

                    Something dumb these peoples
                    1. +1
                      31 December 2019 19: 15
                      And you prefer white-faced gentlemen who drop nuclear bombs on peaceful cities ... And there are enough uneducated marginals everywhere, or "Who does not jump ...." Are African blacks chanting?
                      1. +1
                        31 December 2019 19: 28
                        Quote: Finches
                        And you prefer white-faced gentlemen dropping nuclear bombs on peaceful cities.

                        Are these some kind of peaceful cities? Those who massively poisoned the Chinese?
                      2. 0
                        31 December 2019 19: 29
                        So they would have thrown them to the Kwantung group ... For some reason, they didn’t teach me in this way in the military school!
                      3. +1
                        31 December 2019 19: 35
                        Quote: Finches
                        So would be thrown to the Kwantung group.

                        That is, again to China?
                        And the methods of warfare in these ..... the photo is no better
                      4. +1
                        31 December 2019 19: 43
                        Why again to China? The Kwantung army was concentrated in Manchuria (Mongolia) and North Korea ... However, I understood your idea! Everything is correct - it is necessary for children, the elderly and women - it is better, worse, than for soldiers and weapons! You are a highly humane person! laughing
                      5. +1
                        31 December 2019 19: 52
                        Quote: Finches
                        However, I understood your idea! Everything is correct - it is necessary for children, the elderly and women - it is better, worse, than for soldiers and weapons! You are a highly humane person.

                        Well, to bomb with atomic bombs the territory into which our troops will later enter and in which the same old men and women notice this your desire. Although you have not been taught this at your school.

                        I dislike all these Hezbollahs and other "organizations" that hate all white gentlemen and you among them, no matter how you justify them. What I wrote about, and everything else is your speculation.
                      6. The comment was deleted.
                      7. 0
                        31 December 2019 20: 42
                        Quote: Finches
                        Piled everything in a heap

                        I deleted your post, according to paragraph 3 of the rules of defamation, the incitement of quarrels and contention.
                      8. 0
                        31 December 2019 21: 51
                        No problem! You can permanently delete a post, but you can’t erase words from a song! hi
                      9. 0
                        1 January 2020 12: 39
                        Quote: Finches
                        No problem! You can permanently delete a post, but you can’t erase words from a song!

                        Do not expect. And it's fixable
                      10. 0
                        1 January 2020 12: 40
                        Blessed is he who believes ... laughing
                      11. 0
                        1 January 2020 12: 54
                        Quote: Finches
                        Blessed is he who believes ...

                        Creed quia absurdum
                      12. 0
                        1 January 2020 12: 56
                        But what about Errare humanum est?
                      13. +3
                        1 January 2020 12: 58
                        Quote: Finches
                        Errare humanum est?

                        Forgot to add sed stultum est in errore perseverare
                      14. 0
                        1 January 2020 13: 02
                        Staying stupid ... that's right! But your arguments did not convince me that I am not reasoning correctly! And you say hatred of Hezbollah - I do not accept terror, but the state of Israel does not always use legal methods to protect itself!
                      15. -4
                        1 January 2020 00: 26
                        About Japan, which was bombed with atomic bombs. As crazy as it may sound, the atomic bombing and subsequent surrender saved millions of Japanese from death, who would have inevitably died if Japan had been taken like Germany. As a result, Japan withdrew from WWII with 2.7 million casualties, while Germany lost 7.5 million. Yes, and the Americans figured that in the event of the occupation of Japan, American losses would be 324000 soldiers. In this way, the 120000 killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki have saved millions of other lives. Here, such "non-humane accounting" turns out ...
                      16. +5
                        1 January 2020 00: 35
                        Are you serious??? A soldier is fighting, only against a soldier, if he is fighting against a civilian population - he is a war criminal!
                      17. +1
                        1 January 2020 00: 43
                        It's like that. But when the war is as global as WWII, here, apparently, the calculations were global: not a soldier per soldier, but a country per country. Any damage to the enemy, which leads to victory and to the least loss at home, was considered as possible. It’s not for us to judge about that time. We can only analyze the results.
                      18. +4
                        1 January 2020 00: 52
                        It was just an indicative number for the political leadership of the USSR and that’s all - with the war and Japan it was all pretty clear - but in addition to this, the cunning Yankees provided the right to put an end to Japan’s most powerful military group, the Kwantung Army, namely the soldiers and officers of the Soviet army ! In the words of Marshal Konev, our army, after capturing Berlin, could storm even the sky! And the Americans were banally afraid that we would not limit ourselves to Oder - that is why they dropped bombs on peaceful Japanese cities - it was just a cynical and bloody public relations action of intimidation! Not having any military significance! This is a war crime - and the place of these children on the same bench in Nuremberg!
                      19. -1
                        1 January 2020 01: 02
                        I agree that the allies of the USSR - America and Great Britain were afraid that Stalin could crush the whole of Europe and even then sought to restrain Stalin. But the military significance of the atomic bombings was obvious: it was after them that Japan surrendered unconditionally and did not need to be occupied. Many Japanese and Allied soldiers survived precisely because of the atomic bomb. It is a fact.
                      20. +3
                        1 January 2020 01: 08
                        I'm leaving from the computer to the table. Happy New Year! drinks hi
                      21. +1
                        1 January 2020 01: 11
                        hi Happy New Year! And all the best for the New Year! drinks
                      22. +1
                        1 January 2020 10: 25
                        therefore, they dropped bombs on peaceful Japanese cities - it was just a cynical and bloody PR campaign of intimidation! Not having any military significance! This is a war crime - and the place of these children on the same bench in Nuremberg!

                        Could drop bombs on ports or weapons factories, but dropped on civilians.
                      23. +1
                        1 January 2020 02: 47
                        However ... And historians say Uncle Sam has flogged Japan so that Uncle Joe can clearly show anyone more weighty arguments. And they burned the Germans in Dresden, again, for the good, otherwise they would have resisted. What wonderful teachers, you know ..
                      24. -2
                        1 January 2020 07: 43
                        Quote: Krillon
                        And they burned the Germans in Dresden, again, for the good, otherwise they would have resisted.

                        How did these mourners of the unfortunate Dresden Germans get. Do you want to remember your citizens?
                        "On August 23, 1942, Stalingrad underwent the first massive aerial bombardment, which literally mixed it with the ground. More than 40 thousand people died ..."
                        I never understood these pseudo-pacifists. Why, for the sake of political conjuncture, do you need to feel sorry for the former enemy who brought so much grief?
                      25. D16
                        +1
                        1 January 2020 11: 22
                        How did these mourners of the unfortunate Dresden Germans get. Do you want to remember your citizens?

                        I do not remember that the Anglo-Saxons would arrange such bombing of cities, which should be in their zone of occupation. Some strange selective revenge was obtained by the Anglo-Saxons.
                      26. -3
                        1 January 2020 12: 07
                        Quote: D16
                        I do not remember that the Anglo-Saxons would arrange such bombing of cities, which should be in their zone of occupation

                        you still write that the vile Angles hit the citizens of the GDR. When they struck Dresden it was still a Reich.
                      27. D16
                        +1
                        1 January 2020 12: 11
                        you still write that the vile Angles hit the citizens of the GDR.

                        It is interesting that they were prevented from also burning out the territory of the future of Germany? That. that Dresden would be in our zone of occupation was obvious.
                      28. -4
                        1 January 2020 13: 47
                        Quote: D16
                        It is interesting that they were prevented from also burning out the territory of the future of Germany? That. that Dresden would be in our zone of occupation was obvious.

                        Do you understand that you are looking for a black cat in a room where she is not?
                        In 1941, the Soviet Air Force flew to bomb Berlin. Let's blame them for that. After all, Berlin also ended up in the Soviet zone of occupation.
                      29. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 14: 52
                        Do you understand that you are looking for a black cat in a room where she is not?

                        -Do you see a gopher?
                        -not
                        -And he is. (C) laughing
                        In 1941, the Soviet Air Force flew to bomb Berlin.

                        They tried. At 41m. And this does not at all justify the destruction of German cities in our zone of occupation. And without special need for 44m and 45m, when everything was already clear.
                      30. -2
                        1 January 2020 15: 13
                        Quote: D16
                        And without special need for 44m and 45m, when everything was already clear.

                        Do you feel sorry for the Germans or the destruction of the infrastructure of the Reich, which HP got to the USSR?
                      31. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 15: 24
                        You feel sorry for the Germans

                        It will seem strange to you, but yes. I would not want to be in their place. When they decide for you, but everyone pays.
                        or the destruction of the infrastructure of the Reich, which HP got the USSR?

                        The meaning of this action was that: "Nr went to the USSR."
                      32. -3
                        1 January 2020 16: 06
                        Quote: D16
                        It will seem strange to you, but yes. I would not want to be in their place. When they decide for you, but everyone pays.

                        You have a fundamental error in this. Hitler came to power ABSOLUTELY in a democratic way in 1933. The Germans voted for the great Reich and could not help but realize that it was not possible to build it without a new war in Europe. They just hoped to win this new war, but it turned out a little differently. And I advise you to read what ordinary Germans write about the war in various German-speaking forums. This is not difficult to do using a google translator. Read precisely the opinions of ordinary Germans, and not official articles. Believe them, you do not mind. Many of them express their indignation that the Bolsheviks attacked Germany at the end of 1944 (that the war had been waged for 4 years before, they do not take into account, since their families did not suffer from the war). In general, Germany suffered no less from the USSR than the USSR from Germany, so many believe that today's Russia should pay for the occupation of Germany for 45 years, just as Germany paid reparations after the war.
                      33. D16
                        +1
                        1 January 2020 16: 39
                        You have a fundamental error in this. Hitler came to power ABSOLUTELY in a democratic way in 1933. The Germans voted for the great Reich and could not help but realize that it was not possible to build it without a new war in Europe. They just hoped to win this new war, but it turned out a little differently.

                        "Hitlers come and go, but the German people remain" (c). Fortunately, the leadership of the USSR had smart people who were not prone to Judaism and genocide.
                        Read precisely the opinions of ordinary Germans, and not official articles. Believe them, you do not mind.

                        The Germans, they are all different. The vast majority appreciated what the USSR had the right to do, but did not. But the fact that they do not feel sorry for you is obvious.
                        And in general, Germany suffered from the USSR no less than the USSR from Germany

                        Yes. Thanks to the help of the Anglo-Saxons, Germany suffered much more than it could.
                        Russia must pay for the occupation of Germany for 45 years, just as Germany paid reparations after the war.

                        I have no doubt about the existence of the individual. That's just the Federal Republic of Germany paid nothing.
                      34. -2
                        1 January 2020 16: 52
                        Quote: D16
                        That's just the Federal Republic of Germany paid nothing.

                        East Germany paid.
                        In addition, after the war, the USSR received East Prussia (all), West Prussia (part), Silesia (part), East Pomerania and East Brandenburg, the former Free City of Danzig, and Szczecin district west of the river as reparations.
                        All these lands (except for a small part of East Prussia, now it is the Kaliningrad region) of the USSR in 1945, with the consent of the Anglo-Saxons, EXCHANGED with Poland (without its consent) for Zap. Ukraine, Zap. Belarus and Vilna with the Vilnius Territory, which the USSR had torn away from Poland on 17.09.1939/30.07.1941/1945, and then returned to Poland on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX (Sikorsky-May Agreement). Those. actually zap. Ukraine, Zap. Belarus and Vilnius with the Vilnius Territory became part of the USSR in XNUMX.
                      35. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 17: 12
                        East Germany paid.

                        AND? We won and returned to our borders. GDR really paid. And there was something to pay for. But Germany and the EU undeservedly avoided this fate.
                      36. -1
                        1 January 2020 17: 24
                        Quote: D16
                        We won and returned to our borders.

                        I don’t think you participated in the war.
                        And Russia did not participate in it either.
                        Therefore, you simply could not defeat anyone in that war.
                        Quote: D16
                        like the EU, this fate was undeservedly avoided.

                        In fact, part of Germany (GDR), Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia and Albania were given for feeding the USSR.
                        Yugoslavia and Albania quickly sent the USSR to hell. And the rest could not. Until 1990, only now fattening was not going in the direction in which it was originally intended.
                      37. D16
                        -1
                        1 January 2020 17: 33
                        I don’t think you participated in the war.
                        And Russia did not participate in it either.

                        Two of my grandfathers were very involved. I am with them. laughing
                        In fact, part of Germany (GDR), Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia and Albania were given for feeding the USSR.

                        They were not given away. They were taken away and no one on the other side of the Elbe howled was ready to challenge it.
                        Yugoslavia and Albania quickly sent the USSR to hell.

                        And they fought with the USSR on the side of Germany?
                      38. -2
                        1 January 2020 18: 03
                        Quote: D16
                        Two of my grandfathers were very involved.

                        It does not really matter. Your personal involvement or non-participation is important.
                        Quote: D16
                        They were taken away and no one on the other side of the Elbe howled was ready to challenge it.

                        You are mistaken. They were GIVEN, and, in advance, in Yalta.
                        At the same time, Finland was not surrendered, and the Red Army did not occupy Finland (except for the areas transferred to the USSR by the Anglo-Saxons).
                        Austria was not given, and the Red Army left Austria.
                        Quote: D16
                        And they fought with the USSR on the side of Germany?

                        And what does it matter? Poland, as a whole, was an ally of the USSR and fought with the Germans from 01.09.1939/XNUMX/XNUMX. Nevertheless, it was surrendered to the USSR and occupied by it.
                        The same applies to Bulgaria, which the USSR itself attacked in 1944.
                        The same applies to the Czech Republic, which did not participate in WW2 at all.
                      39. MMX
                        0
                        2 January 2020 15: 21
                        Quote: D-ug
                        Quote: D16
                        We won and returned to our borders.

                        I don’t think you participated in the war.
                        And Russia did not participate in it either.
                        Therefore, you simply could not defeat anyone in that war.
                        .


                        Russia (as part of the USSR) participated in the war very much. Even if we consider the situation today, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).
                        If you talk like that, then modern Israel does not have any rights to historical lands.

                        In fact, part of Germany (GDR), Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia and Albania were given for feeding the USSR.

                        These are your sick fantasies.
                        Yugoslavia and Albania quickly sent the USSR to hell. And the rest could not. Until 1990, only now fattening was not going in the direction in which it was originally intended.

                        Sick Fantasy 2
                      40. -1
                        2 January 2020 15: 29
                        Quote: MMX
                        Russia (as part of the USSR) participated in the war very much.

                        The Russian Federation until 1991 did not exist.
                        And she is not the heiress of the USSR, only the successor.
                        Therefore, to 2MV of the Russian Federation does not belong to any side.
                        Quote: MMX
                        The Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).

                        Actually, the legal succession does not apply to ALL rights. Contractual obligations, yes, apply. But also only partly.
                        You confuse succession with inheritance.
                        Quote: MMX
                        If you talk like that, then modern Israel does not have any rights to historical lands.

                        Israel is a member of the UN. So its existence is legitimate.
                      41. MMX
                        0
                        2 January 2020 15: 43
                        Quote: D-ug
                        Quote: MMX
                        Russia (as part of the USSR) participated in the war very much.

                        The Russian Federation until 1991 did not exist.
                        And she is not the heiress of the USSR, only the successor.
                        .

                        I kind of wrote in Russian:
                        Even if we consider the situation today, then the Russian Federation - assignee THE USSR...



                        Actually, the legal succession does not apply to ALL rights. Contractual obligations, yes, apply. But also only partly.
                        You confuse succession with inheritance.

                        You tell the Japanese. And then they require some kind of islands from the Russian Federation. And the Russian Federation, in your own words, did not exist in those days ... good

                        Israel is a member of the UN. So its existence is legitimate.

                        And I’m not talking about existence, but about rights in the territory.
                      42. -1
                        2 January 2020 15: 46
                        Quote: MMX
                        I kind of wrote in Russian:

                        And I kind of wrote in Russian:
                        Quote: D-ug
                        You confuse succession with inheritance.

                        Quote: MMX
                        You tell the Japanese

                        I'll tell you. How much will you pay for the work?
                        Quote: MMX
                        And I’m not talking about existence, but about rights in the territory.

                        Its existence within the designated (and recognized) upon entry into the UN territories is legitimate.
                      43. MMX
                        0
                        2 January 2020 15: 55
                        Quote: D-ug
                        Quote: MMX
                        I kind of wrote in Russian:

                        And I kind of wrote in Russian:
                        Quote: D-ug
                        You confuse succession with inheritance.



                        The assignee under the contracts and the heir (if you wish) on the material part. Questions?

                        I'll tell you. How much will you pay for the work?

                        This is not for me, to the Kremlin. If you tell sensible things and discover the truth, you will get rich, don’t even doubt it lol

                        Its existence within the designated (and recognized) upon entry into the UN territories is legitimate.

                        And the Golan? laughing
                      44. +1
                        2 January 2020 16: 00
                        Quote: MMX
                        The assignee under the contracts and the heir (if you wish) on the material part. Questions?

                        In terms of contracts and in terms of the "material part".
                        It is not enough to declare yourself the assignee. We must also agree with ALL other applicants (14 pieces) about this.
                        I think the question of the legitimacy of the Russian law-enforcement system will still emerge. And the "offended" will have to pay. They hid for now. But this is only for now.
                      45. MMX
                        0
                        2 January 2020 16: 07
                        Quote: D-ug
                        Quote: MMX
                        The assignee under the contracts and the heir (if you wish) on the material part. Questions?

                        In terms of contracts and in terms of the "material part".
                        It is not enough to declare yourself the assignee. We must also agree with ALL other applicants (14 pieces) about this.
                        I think the question of the legitimacy of the Russian law-enforcement system will still emerge. And the "offended" will have to pay. They hid for now. But this is only for now.


                        I (and the Russian Federation) are little worried about the burned. There are treaties and international acts.
                        The Russian Federation currently acts as the assignee of the USSR and the successor of its business. If you do not know, then the Russian Federation is a permanent member of the UN Security Council precisely because of the succession from the USSR (as an example).
                      46. 0
                        2 January 2020 16: 23
                        Quote: MMX
                        I (and the Russian Federation) are little worried about the burned.

                        This is for now. And when the time comes to pay them "compensation", everything will not be so much fun.
                        Quote: MMX
                        At present, the Russian Federation acts as the successor of the USSR and the successor of its cause.

                        Do not make up. That is what the Russian Federation is not and will never be, so it is the continuation of the cause of the USSR.
                        Quote: MMX
                        If you do not know, then Russia is a permanent member of the UN Security Council precisely because of the succession from the USSR

                        I would not raise this topic in your place. Everything is very difficult there. And 10 more times everything can change.
                      47. MMX
                        0
                        2 January 2020 17: 02
                        Quote: D-ug
                        Quote: MMX
                        I (and the Russian Federation) are little worried about the burned.

                        This is for now. And when the time comes to pay them "compensation", everything will not be so much fun.


                        I see you are obsessed with money. All payments seem to you laughing

                        Do not make up. That is what the Russian Federation is not and will never be, so it is the continuation of the cause of the USSR.

                        I’m not making it up. Everything has long been invented before me and written on paper.

                        I would not raise this topic in your place. Everything is very difficult there. And 10 more times everything can change.

                        Maybe for you personally and not just. But there is a UN Charter and everything is written there. Read. Like from me (note free !!!).
                      48. -1
                        2 January 2020 18: 03
                        Quote: MMX
                        Like from me (note free !!!).

                        You are not capable of it. You know the material.
                        And the question is with the UN, he, I am afraid, will still come up. In my time.
                        Yes, and with the legal succession of the USSR, too.
                        It does not depend on us, but there are plenty of leads there.
                      49. MMX
                        -1
                        3 January 2020 15: 54
                        Quote: D-ug
                        Quote: MMX
                        Like from me (note free !!!).

                        You are not capable of it. You know the material.

                        If a knowledgeable person or an educated person were discussing with me, then maybe I had to at least put in the force, and since I am discussing with you, this is not necessary.

                        And the question is with the UN, he, I am afraid, will still come up. In my time.

                        So the Russian Federation itself says that it is necessary to reform the UN, but do not touch the permanent members of the Security Council lol

                        Yes, and with the legal succession of the USSR, too.
                        It does not depend on us, but there are plenty of leads there.

                        If the Russian Federation itself does not want this, then nothing will happen.
                      50. +2
                        2 January 2020 15: 44
                        Quote: MMX
                        Even if we consider the situation today, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).

                        No. The USSR has 15 successors. Uzbekistan received rights to the territory and airspace of Uzbekistan. The Russian Federation had to negotiate with each of the successors to settle the debts and property of the USSR. And not everyone has managed to reach an agreement so far.
                      51. MMX
                        0
                        2 January 2020 15: 49
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Even if we consider the situation today, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).

                        No. The USSR has 15 successors. Uzbekistan received rights to the territory and airspace of Uzbekistan. The Russian Federation had to negotiate with each of the successors to settle the debts and property of the USSR. And not everyone has managed to reach an agreement so far.


                        So what am I talking about, the Russian Federation-the successor to the USSR.
                      52. +1
                        2 January 2020 18: 40
                        Quote: MMX
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Even if we consider the situation today, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).

                        No. The USSR has 15 successors. Uzbekistan received rights to the territory and airspace of Uzbekistan. The Russian Federation had to negotiate with each of the successors to settle the debts and property of the USSR. And not everyone has managed to reach an agreement so far.


                        So what am I talking about, the Russian Federation-the successor to the USSR.

                        Well yes. Just not the only one. There are 14 more.
                      53. MMX
                        0
                        3 January 2020 15: 43
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Even if we consider the situation today, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).

                        No. The USSR has 15 successors. Uzbekistan received rights to the territory and airspace of Uzbekistan. The Russian Federation had to negotiate with each of the successors to settle the debts and property of the USSR. And not everyone has managed to reach an agreement so far.


                        So what am I talking about, the Russian Federation-the successor to the USSR.

                        Well yes. Just not the only one. There are 14 more.


                        Yes? There are 15 heirs, and only 1 as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, strange ... laughing
                        Now live with it lol
                      54. +1
                        3 January 2020 16: 09
                        Quote: MMX
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Even if we consider the situation today, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).

                        No. The USSR has 15 successors. Uzbekistan received rights to the territory and airspace of Uzbekistan. The Russian Federation had to negotiate with each of the successors to settle the debts and property of the USSR. And not everyone has managed to reach an agreement so far.


                        So what am I talking about, the Russian Federation-the successor to the USSR.

                        Well yes. Just not the only one. There are 14 more.


                        Yes? There are 15 heirs, and only 1 as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, strange ... laughing
                        Now live with it lol

                        So what? The Soviet-Afghan border did not rightfully cross the Russian Federation. Now live with it.
                      55. MMX
                        0
                        3 January 2020 21: 54
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Quote: professor
                        Quote: MMX
                        Even if we consider the situation today, the Russian Federation is the successor of the USSR (it took all the rights and debts).

                        No. The USSR has 15 successors. Uzbekistan received rights to the territory and airspace of Uzbekistan. The Russian Federation had to negotiate with each of the successors to settle the debts and property of the USSR. And not everyone has managed to reach an agreement so far.


                        So what am I talking about, the Russian Federation-the successor to the USSR.

                        Well yes. Just not the only one. There are 14 more.


                        Yes? There are 15 heirs, and only 1 as a permanent member of the UN Security Council, strange ... laughing
                        Now live with it lol

                        So what? The Soviet-Afghan border did not rightfully cross the Russian Federation. Now live with it.

                        Didn't the Golan Heights Cross Israel? Live now with this.
                      56. +3
                        1 January 2020 16: 36
                        Quote: D16
                        you still write that the vile Angles hit the citizens of the GDR.

                        It is interesting that they were prevented from also burning out the territory of the future of Germany? That. that Dresden would be in our zone of occupation was obvious.

                        And the Ruhr? Frankfurt am Main? Dusseldorf? Wurzburg?
                      57. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 17: 41
                        Come on. There was not close what was arranged in our zone.
                      58. +2
                        1 January 2020 17: 56
                        The center of Würzburg was demolished completely, Frankfurt was also in ruins, and the Ruhr was threshed from the 43rd. It’s just that the Germans threw most of the fighter aircraft in Germany to defend their industrial center, there was quite massive air defense artillery, so the Germans were able to inflict significant damage only by the end of the 44th. However, local cities were destroyed. According to Dresden, it was a node poorly protected from aviation by the railway, the Celsian optics for the war were also made there by the EMNIP. The destruction of the city during the offensive of the Red Army was the topic for us. It’s a pity, especially children, but the Germans didn’t spare our peaceful people during the war, and if we take into account children's "donor" concentration camps, then there’s nothing to talk about.
                      59. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 18: 06
                        Here you go straight from the unwanted Google: http://mydusseldorf.com/dusseldorf/voennye-poteri-razrusheniya-v-dyusseldorfe-cifra-51
                        By the way, we did not understand the destruction of Dresden and Cologne. The application was for the railway node.
                      60. +2
                        1 January 2020 18: 13
                        Now I read. I didn’t understand - I don’t know .. when the Americans and the British brought to Moscow a slide album with a view of German cities before and after from the air (like the image after was superimposed on the image before), everyone liked it at Headquarters, because The greater European part of the USSR also lay in ruins. After the war, for propaganda purposes (for the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic), both parties in the Cold War used tales of the “crimes of Russians / allies” in Germany. Well, at the same time, they brought it to their peoples, also for the sake of propaganda. By the way - Cologne is also the western zone of occupation.
                      61. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 23: 59
                        By the way - Cologne is also the western zone of occupation.

                        I know. There, near the cathedral, there was one of the most popular tank battles. Of which there were thousands.
                      62. +2
                        1 January 2020 18: 19
                        I read - you see, they bombed already from the 42nd - but this is the Ruhr. Accordingly - it was protected much better than Dresden.
                      63. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 23: 36
                        We are starting to delve into the details. which do not change anything.
                      64. +2
                        2 January 2020 00: 07
                        Well, if you delve into the details, then everything changes. )))
                        For example, according to the conclusions of the German commission in 2008, 18 to 25 thousand people died in Dresden, and 42 thousand died during the bombing of Stalingrad. hi
                      65. -1
                        1 January 2020 17: 28
                        Quote: D16
                        I do not remember that the Anglo-Saxons would arrange such bombing of cities, which should be in their zone of occupation. The Anglo-Saxons got some kind of strange-selective revenge

                        And in vain. There were such "Dresdens" all over the Reich just dark darkness.
                        By 1945, the Reich generally lay in ruins.
                      66. +2
                        1 January 2020 13: 27
                        We want to. And remember. And for Stalingrad, for Leningrad, for the grief and suffering of millions of our citizens, Women, children, old people. But did they really get to Berlin to cut everyone out in revenge? This civilian population and terror against him is a war crime, in Nuremberg they gave an assessment, though the victorious countries gave otherwise, for the same Dresden a bench was found and for those he gave the order for the bombing. But the winners are not judged as is known. The USSR is also not soft and fluffy, as an example of a raid on Helsinki on November 30, 39, which affected the expulsion from the League of Nations on December 14. You just need to remember that when you kill a dragon, you yourself become a dragon.
                      67. -2
                        1 January 2020 14: 18
                        Quote: Krillon
                        You just need to remember that when you kill a dragon, you yourself become a dragon.

                        This is very reminiscent of today's identification in Europe of fascist Germany and the USSR.
                        Is there another way? Maybe you had to give up?
                      68. 0
                        1 January 2020 16: 18
                        My opinion is Europe played. The leader there is Germany. My opinion. But remembering what happened relatively recently from the point of view of history, they cannot leave it unattended, hence the presence of Americans on its territory under the pretext of protection. From whom only? The Warsaw Pact, like the USSR, rested in Bose, who is now considered as an imaginary threat? In fact, the states eliminate competitors, the same gas, trying to crush the market for themselves. According to Marx, all wars are fought for the market. And that Russia, the dogs bark, the caravan is coming. Somewhere and surrendered, the number of prisoners in the war, the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation indicates 4 million. 559 thousand people despite the fact that the total number of the Wehrmacht was 3 million 214 thousand people, and somewhere we recouped. As a result, they did not go to Moscow, but we came to Berlin.
                      69. 0
                        1 January 2020 17: 17
                        You forgot about the scorched Japanese cities, Igor, so you will not find humane accounting here.
                        Here is a link on the topic: https://www.vpk-news.ru/articles/34709
                    2. D16
                      -1
                      1 January 2020 11: 02
                      Something dumb these peoples

                      Who are they?
                      1. +4
                        1 January 2020 16: 39
                        Al Shabab most likely Nigerian
                        Or a gang breaking away from them, swearing Daesh
                      2. D16
                        0
                        1 January 2020 16: 50
                        And the look of igi-igami. To me, for example, the Hussites are prettier as enemies of Israel and America. I can imagine what will happen if they are pulled to the current technological level. I did not know about the participation of Iraqis in the war of the 73rd year.
                      3. +3
                        1 January 2020 17: 11
                        Daesh is ISIS
                        Iraqis - there were 20-30 thousand of them, with 200 tanks. We approached the IDF counter-offensive in the Syrian direction
                        The Jews were slowed down (they really didn’t have much time before Syria, they threw units to the Egyptian front), but the attempt from a counterattack cost the Iraqis half of the remaining tanks - they got into an impromptu ambush. Well, the Israelis prevented the approach of other parts by blowing up the bridge by special forces (in one case, in the second, the special forces with a bunch of wounded barely took their feet, and the bridge had to be finished off by air), and then by Hale Avira bombing.
                      4. D16
                        +1
                        1 January 2020 17: 18
                        Daesh is ISIS

                        So it’s incorrect to display photos of complete scumbags. They are the enemies of all.
                        The Jews were slowed down (they really didn’t have much time before Syria, they threw units to the Egyptian front), but the attempt from a counterattack cost the Iraqis half of the remaining tanks - they got into an impromptu ambush.

                        I did not know if there would be time to read about it.
                2. +4
                  31 December 2019 16: 52
                  Do you mind if I join your opinion?
                  Unfortunately, Arabs are no warriors. This became clear during the Six Day War.
                  You can treat the Jews as you like, it’s everyone’s personal business, but you won’t take one from them - they are excellent fighters. It is a fact.
                  1. +1
                    31 December 2019 17: 06
                    Quote: Tuk77
                    Do you mind if I join your opinion?

                    The thought is not mine, it is a statement of fact.
                    But in our "strange" informational time, for voicing the truth you can get so many negative labels that you think. It’s easier to “get promoted” to "general" by criticizing everything wink
                  2. +2
                    31 December 2019 17: 12
                    So there for a quarter our people ... laughing
                  3. 0
                    31 December 2019 19: 56
                    Quote: Tuk77
                    Do you mind if I join your opinion?
                    Unfortunately, Arabs are no warriors. This became clear during the Six Day War.
                    You can treat the Jews as you like, it’s everyone’s personal business, but you won’t take one from them - they are excellent fighters. It is a fact.

                    During the Six Day Arabs beautifully capitalized what is, that is ... good
                  4. D16
                    0
                    1 January 2020 11: 36
                    You can treat the Jews as you like, it’s everyone’s personal business, but you won’t take one from them - they are excellent fighters. It is a fact.

                    Those who gathered in Israel from all over the world and participated in the last war without a doubt. But this does not negate the fact that they were used to capture Arab territories.
                3. 0
                  31 December 2019 19: 42
                  part of the Russian-speaking population they hate each other, the Ethiopian community, if that takes to the streets, and the Russian-speaking still put a friend and friend
              2. 0
                31 December 2019 18: 11
                Quote: Finches
                At that time, the truth was for the Arabs ... Now, perhaps, again for the Arabs ...

                What was the TRUTH then and what today?
                1. -1
                  31 December 2019 18: 13
                  True, she is one - all for the good of Russia!
                  1. -2
                    31 December 2019 18: 28
                    Quote: Finches
                    True, she is one - all for the good of Russia!

                    The desire of the Arabs in 1948 to destroy the state of Israel, you call the blessing for Russia?
                    Then please explain what it is good was where it disappeared after the defeat of all benefactors and what's up with that good became today.
                    1. +2
                      31 December 2019 19: 17
                      Are you from Tel Aviv writing? And would you like it if in the middle of your summer cottage a neighbor would build his house, even having some kind of mythical historical rights ... Hardly! So you can understand the Arabs somewhere!
                      1. -2
                        31 December 2019 19: 54
                        Quote: Finches
                        Are you from Tel Aviv writing?

                        No, from Netanya.
                        Quote: Finches
                        And would you like if in the middle of your summer cottage a neighbor would build his house

                        I do not have a summer cottage.
                        Quote: Finches
                        So Arabs can be understood somewhere

                        Let's understand together.

                        1948 year
                        Palestine is divided into two states: JEWISH AND ARAB.
                        The Arabs did not agree, lost, lost territory, you officer understand.
                        Part went to Israel, part to Jordan, and part to Egypt.
                        They did not want to live peacefully, once again ALL attacked together and ALL together lost ALL.
                        Who signed a peace treaty, he got back, who does not, continues to dream (Syria)
                        Israel left Gaza in 2005 the whole plot belongs to them
                        and rockets fly from there.
                        There was not a big piece of the West Bank left, Judea (the name speaks for itself), it is partially under Israeli control and having Bitter experience with the Gaza Strip, Israel will not leave from there in the near future. rockets will fly from there tomorrow.
                        Any questions?
                        HAPPY NEW YEAR!
                      2. 0
                        31 December 2019 20: 33
                        Happy New Year! drinks
                2. D16
                  0
                  1 January 2020 12: 44
                  What was the TRUTH then and what today?

                  The truth is that the Jewish lobby at the UN, with the support of the USSR, registered a Jewish state in the Arab territories, and most Arabs were against it. For some reason, the Jews in Palestine liked it more than in Birobidzhan. Then the American Jewish lobby bought the "Israel project" with American money with giblets, leaving the USSR with a nose. Today Israel's appetites have grown and the tail has begun to wag the dogs.
              3. 0
                1 January 2020 02: 36
                The victory is not justice but organization. The Israelis could.
                1. 0
                  1 January 2020 02: 42
                  This is not to be taken from the Israelis - as soon as Jesus drove out the loan sharks and hucksters from the Temple, they immediately brought him under the cross ... by the hands of the Romans ....! Organized people from time immemorial! And don’t say .... laughing
                  1. 0
                    1 January 2020 13: 52
                    But I read that Jesus doesn’t have authority, so to speak, 75% of Jews, 17 Muslims, 2 Christians. So he is for them to worry about this.
                    1. -1
                      1 January 2020 13: 53
                      It is truth too!
                  2. +2
                    1 January 2020 16: 45
                    Quote: Finches
                    This is not to be taken from the Israelis - as soon as Jesus drove out the loan sharks and hucksters from the Temple, they immediately brought him under the cross ... by the hands of the Romans ....! Organized people from time immemorial! And don’t say .... laughing

                    Heh))
                    Collaborators of the Romans framed Jesus, among which 40% of the soldiers were Greeks, the founders of Christianity in its modern form. Patriots removed Jesus from the cross, after stoning his brother Jacob with stones, the Romans were forced to change the local temple authority in order to avoid rebellion - learn the history ... and the New Testament at the same time
                    1. 0
                      1 January 2020 16: 46
                      Do you advocate? Oh well laughing Some historians at VO have gathered recently and everyone advises her to train her up! laughing laughing
                      1. +3
                        1 January 2020 16: 52
                        I do not advocate - I ascertain the fact of your lack of knowledge in this matter laughing
                        At the same time, I am not a supporter of the interpretation of Holy Scripture - pagans and atheists are not pigs or dogs hi In my opinion
                      2. 0
                        1 January 2020 16: 53
                        Do not Jews mean Jesus crucified?
                      3. +2
                        1 January 2020 16: 54
                        Are the Romans and Greeks Jews? lol
                        Crucified him for separatism. INRI.
                      4. 0
                        1 January 2020 16: 56
                        So King Herod and the high priest Caiaphas were one Roman, and the second Greek?
                      5. 0
                        1 January 2020 17: 00
                        And Judah was probably an Arab laughing
          2. +1
            31 December 2019 16: 16
            Quote: Finches
            Unfortunately, in the confrontation between Jews and Arabs, it was necessary to choose some side - the USSR chose Arabs!

            So it was more honest and now we realized that the choice of the USSR was right! hi
          3. +1
            31 December 2019 18: 06
            Because the Jews chose another lord.
            1. +3
              31 December 2019 18: 17
              Quote: tracer
              Because the Jews chose another lord.

              Jews have only one lord. and the elections were a long time ago.
              1. +1
                31 December 2019 19: 43
                The answer is not true, the gentleman did not hear about it, but as he heard it scattered on impudence
          4. +1
            1 January 2020 10: 55
            The USSR could not choose Israel, because at that time it was completely dependent on the United States.
            1. D16
              0
              1 January 2020 12: 48
              The USSR could not choose Israel, because at that time it was completely dependent on the United States.

              Moreover, Israel threw the USSR in the best Jewish traditions. Do not look at all the support provided.
              1. -1
                1 January 2020 21: 34
                This is how the saying goes: "Trust in a Jew, but do not make a mistake yourself!"
          5. -4
            1 January 2020 11: 30
            That was right. Generally correct.
            1. -1
              1 January 2020 14: 15
              This is right because it is true. Time to betray, not to betray, but to foresee. Although in general they carry out their mission, I’m not talking about the people but about individual representatives. It is thanks to them that humanity is getting rid of many illusions, subsequently adopting the methods and techniques that the Jews have honed to perfection over the centuries of their existence. Occasionally, people get tired of playing these games and then hatred passes to everyone, without exception, pogroms like Tsarist Russia, Kapustin Yar, and stoves in the Nazi concentration camps begin. In most cases, the envy of the engine of these processes, the Jews know that what is not available to others.
            2. The comment was deleted.
          6. 0
            1 January 2020 17: 15
            And not Israel, Eugene?
    2. Maz
      +2
      31 December 2019 18: 48
      Yeah, they hit, they just betrayed that the US embassy was being stormed in Iraq
      Riots at the US Embassy in Baghdad do not subside in the morning. Hundreds of people surrounded the building and stoned it. So the Iraqi people are protesting against the constant attacks of American aircraft on the position of the local militia, which kills dozens of people, including civilians.
      1. +3
        31 December 2019 19: 52
        MAZ, I congratulate you on the New Year, I wish you to continue your ascent to new heights of success by moving to higher salaries in Canada or the States! drinks
        1. Maz
          0
          1 January 2020 11: 52
          And you happy New Year, a patriot of Israel, Schaub loved you even more than last year.
          1. +2
            1 January 2020 14: 39
            Hello boss! laughing
      2. -1
        31 December 2019 20: 04
        Quote: Maz
        as a result, dozens of people die, including civilians.

        Maz, and if experts from Iraq or Iran turned to you to photograph something for them in Israel, would you agree?
  2. -1
    31 December 2019 13: 50
    Yes Yes. The US will do as usual. Immediately rush to help allies laughing
    1. +1
      31 December 2019 14: 21
      In VO no one loves the United States. But let's be reasonable, the Americans will not throw Israel.
      1. +7
        31 December 2019 14: 33
        That’s because the main office is still in Israel, and the United States, although it’s a big office, can do it, the branch laughing
        1. +1
          31 December 2019 14: 57
          A moot point. Here is rather what state - the first or 51st?
        2. +1
          31 December 2019 15: 03
          Quote: Proton
          and the United States, although a large office, but what to do, a branch laughing

          an authoritative grandfather from the Moscow Region told me that the USSR was also a branch, right now things seem to be worse, judging by the number of residents per square meter of any TV channel in the Russian Federation.
  3. +3
    31 December 2019 13: 51
    Two pair boots .... about sizes in such cases do not argue.
  4. +1
    31 December 2019 13: 53
    Missile fire and subsequent retaliatory strikes in al-Qa'imah district are the latest peak of tensions between Washington and Tehran
    . Israel is the trigger of Uncle Sam's nephews to war with Iran.
  5. +15
    31 December 2019 14: 03
    I think the biggest threat to the Middle East .. is Israel! and the IDF.
  6. +1
    31 December 2019 14: 08
    Israeli media: Israel will not have to confront pro-Iranian forces alone, the US will help

    Who would doubt that. The State of Israel is licked to the complete obstruction of the sphincter.
    1. +3
      31 December 2019 14: 19
      and not vice versa?
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        31 December 2019 14: 36
        Israeli media: Israel will not have to confront pro-Iranian forces alone, the US will help

        And that there, on a similar occasion, the Kurds about the United States, not so long ago said ??? winked
  7. +12
    31 December 2019 14: 13
    two countries in the world .. that have included state terrorism as priorities in their foreign policy, these are the USA and Israel!
  8. -1
    31 December 2019 14: 15
    When it comes to Israel that the time has come to pay off mattresses and this price will be great
    1. -1
      31 December 2019 14: 29
      The funny thing is, Israel itself would not touch other countries in the region. Including Iran. and he didn’t have to strain .. But. Is he Israel and is he allowed?
      1. 0
        31 December 2019 14: 36
        Well, in fact, the neighboring Arab states in 1947 themselves decided to crush Israel. Despite the fact that at that time Israel was supported by the United States, and the USSR, and the UN was just created. Therefore, the relationship did not work out from the very beginning. There is an opinion that this was not without the "diplomacy" of the people :)
        1. -1
          31 December 2019 14: 53
          I’m smiling. They came to your house by order from above and began to divide your apartment into two of you. Of course. very satisfied. wink "The UN Plan for the Partition of Palestine is a plan adopted on November 29, 1947 by Resolution No. 181 of the United Nations General Assembly (33 votes in favor, 13 against, 10 abstained). Provided for the termination of the British Mandate in Palestine by August 1 1948 and recommended the creation of two unnamed states on its territory: the Jewish and the Arab .. "
          It was in 1947

          According to the UN plan

          [/ Center]
          1. +6
            31 December 2019 16: 27
            Not quite so. You were issued an apartment warrant. More precisely, you and your neighbor have two separate apartments in a house called Mandatory Palestine.

            The managerial office (Great Britain) secretly allocated a separate apartment to your neighbor (Jordan) despite the fact that he didn’t have a separate apartment and he was a guest and lived in a room in a communal apartment.


            Then we decided the remaining house again split up. You again decided to allocate an apartment and ... to your neighbor who has already been allocated an apartment.


            All this bureaucracy got you and you agreed to Khrushchev only to live separately from the noisy and buzzing neighbors. They issued a warrant for you and your neighbor, but the neighbor broke the wall between your apartments and with friends got on your living space. You gave him cuffs, his friends kicked him out and offered to restore the wall.


            A neighbor living in your room spoils your soup, doesn’t work anywhere, doesn’t pay for a communal apartment and doesn’t want to move to his living space. From requires the entire apartment itself and blunders in all instances. In your half, you have already done a long time renovation, and he has srach and garbage, he throws it to your side.
            1. +1
              31 December 2019 16: 47
              @ A neighbor living in your room spoils your soup, doesn’t work anywhere, doesn’t pay for a communal apartment and doesn’t want to move to his living space @
              So soon it will be, and with Muslim Europe let into the house - reap, and also listen to the tales of the new arrivals
              1. +2
                31 December 2019 21: 18
                The new arrivals are the same Arabs who spoil the Jews in the soup and do not pay the communal apartment)))
              2. -2
                1 January 2020 09: 23
                Quote: To be or not to be
                @ A neighbor living in your room spoils your soup, doesn’t work anywhere, doesn’t pay for a communal apartment and doesn’t want to move to his living space @
                So soon it will be, and with Muslim Europe let into the house - reap, and also listen to the tales of the new arrivals

                It is their choice and their problem.
                1. +1
                  1 January 2020 12: 10
                  Professor (Oleg Sokolov) Today, 09: 23
                  This is their choice and their problem. "
                  You have the right to think so .. but.
                  1. This is not a choice of the peoples of Europe, but their rulers and the system as such
                  2. This is a means of economic struggle of one against the other during a growing general crisis.
                  3. This is the creation of conditions for discontent in European countries and the growth of nationalist movements and the subsequent bringing to power of right-wing parties
                  1. +1
                    1 January 2020 12: 19
                    Quote: To be or not to be
                    1. This is not a choice of the peoples of Europe, but their rulers and the system as such

                    Of course, this is the choice of power that the people have chosen.
                    You (as an example) - for pension reform?
                    And who chose it? - Otozh
                    Quote: To be or not to be
                    2. This is a means of economic struggle of one against the other during a growing general crisis.

                    can be expanded * answer * Especially in terms of crisis.
                    Quote: To be or not to be
                    3. This is the creation of conditions for discontent in European countries and the growth of nationalist movements and the subsequent bringing to power of right-wing parties

                    Strange, the left parties in power are trying to bring the right to power (according to your logic) - are bees against honey or what? belay
                  2. 0
                    1 January 2020 13: 55
                    Quote: To be or not to be
                    Professor (Oleg Sokolov) Today, 09: 23
                    This is their choice and their problem. "
                    You have the right to think so .. but.
                    1. This is not a choice of the peoples of Europe, but their rulers and the system as such
                    2. This is a means of economic struggle of one against the other during a growing general crisis.
                    3. This is the creation of conditions for discontent in European countries and the growth of nationalist movements and the subsequent bringing to power of right-wing parties


                    1. The authorities have chosen the people, and this is the will of the people.
                    2. Everyone would have such a "crisis" as in Europe. Especially in Germany.
                    3. I did not see any discontent being in Austria last week. The locals are happy with the “blacks” doing the dirty work.
                    1. 0
                      1 January 2020 14: 08
                      You are Marxists wink and you know, the criterion of truth. PRACTICE .. wait and see!
    2. +3
      31 December 2019 14: 49
      Quote: Your Honor
      When it comes to Israel that the time has come to pay off mattresses and this price will be great

      Once again sponsoring presidential candidates? laughing
    3. -1
      31 December 2019 15: 25
      Quote: Your Honor
      When it comes to Israel that the time has come to pay off mattresses and this price will be great

      Do you seriously consider Israel an independent country? Yes, it is ruled by Jews, but from the USA.
  9. 0
    31 December 2019 14: 15
    "Very peaceful"? "America will help them"?
  10. +1
    31 December 2019 14: 16
    Israeli media: Israel will not have to confront pro-Iranian forces alone, the United States will help.

    Comment from colony No. 777
    We understand the frankness of the Israeli media and read between the lines of their statement - the "six" always "bull" to please the "godfather", confident in his protection. Otherwise, they will not survive in the community around them. No.
  11. +3
    31 December 2019 14: 20
    And you all do not get sick. Well with the upcoming. drinks
    1. -2
      31 December 2019 14: 23
      The first adequate comment on the branch.
      hi
      1. +5
        31 December 2019 14: 39
        Quote: professor
        The first adequate comment on the branch.
        hi

        Well, you guys are completely away from everyone on the sidelines. Who is against request We Russians are also for adequate posts. Holiday greetings! hi
      2. 0
        31 December 2019 15: 44
        Quote: professor
        The first adequate comment on the branch.
        hi

        Nevertheless, Aron threw cons.
        You have already celebrated the New Year on the Jewish calendar in the fall. But on these holidays, along with everyone, your people all the very best. I hope that you will not be spoiled by shelling.
        drinks
        1. +7
          31 December 2019 16: 14
          Quote: Vladimir_6
          Quote: professor
          The first adequate comment on the branch.
          hi

          Nevertheless, Aron threw cons.
          You have already celebrated the New Year on the Jewish calendar in the fall. But on these holidays, along with everyone, your people all the very best. I hope that you will not be spoiled by shelling.
          drinks

          Is it possible to miss such an occasion to celebrate the New Year? Especially in childhood, we only met him.

          Happy New Year to everyone reading. Health to you and your loved ones and more patience. hi
          1. +2
            31 December 2019 16: 23
            Quote: professor
            Happy New Year to everyone reading. Health to you and your loved ones and more patience.

            And you Oleg all the best! hi
        2. 0
          31 December 2019 16: 21
          Well, what about a free gift for the Russian New Year) wassat Professor, Aron, with the upcoming, you)
          1. 0
            31 December 2019 16: 28
            Quote: yustas
            Well, what about a free gift for the Russian New Year) wassat Professor, Aron, with the upcoming, you)

            You Yuri are wrong. Russian New Year (Summer 7528 from the Creation of the World in the Star Temple) will come at 6-50 a.m. Moscow time on March 20. Year of the Spinning Misgir. hi
            1. -2
              31 December 2019 16: 40
              Vladimir, I’ll clarify the moment, at the same time they’re wrong, for you mention the Slavic New Year, and Russia was created much later. As a matter of fact, the Tatars did not fight with us, but with the brought faith
              1. +1
                31 December 2019 17: 55
                Quote: yustas
                Vladimir, I’ll clarify the moment, at the same time they’re wrong, for you mention the Slavic New Year, and Russia was created much later.

                I am aware that Russia was created later from the Slavic tribes. But the Slavic calendar is compiled for all Slavs. Including for Rusich. That's why I wrote - Russian New Year. And of course, the Slavic New Year sounds right.
                Meet him in March. drinks
            2. -2
              1 January 2020 15: 04
              About the star temple, the neopagans of Hinevich came up with it. In general, that calendar was Christian Byzantine canceled by Peter the first. Without any star temples
              1. 0
                2 January 2020 00: 02
                Quote: pru-pavel
                About the star temple, the neopagans of Hinevich came up with it.

                “This calendar was started by our ancestors 7528 years ago in commemoration of the victory over Arimia (ancient China). After a hard, long and bloody war, China was defeated, and the Peace Treaty was concluded in the Star Temple. from the Creation of the World in the Star Temple ".
                Quote: pru-pavel
                In general, that calendar was Christian Byzantine canceled by Peter the first.

                The last day of the Byzantine era was December 31, 7208.
                And the next day was already reckoned by decree of Peter I according to the new chronology of the "Nativity of Christ" - January 1, 1700.
  12. -1
    31 December 2019 14: 25
    how jackal from mowgli
  13. -4
    31 December 2019 14: 25
    Quote: Tomcat Tomaszevic
    In what? Israel is fully capable of confronting Iran alone!

    Roy bomb shelter and deeper laughing
  14. 0
    31 December 2019 14: 31
    It is high time for Iran to start responding like that, the chosen people do not see the coast at all. Israel is a very small country, they do not need much.
  15. +1
    31 December 2019 14: 38
    There is no way to sit back behind Uncle Sam. Iran may well take a preemptive strike.
  16. +5
    31 December 2019 14: 39
    violence breeds violence .. it’s time to stop in your while with impunity!
  17. +1
    31 December 2019 14: 41
    "Sorry", but it is not clear what does K1 in Kirkuk and Hezbollah have to do with it ??? Something looks like a "shadow on the fence" ...
    BAGHDAD, December 30, 2019 The Iraqi armed forces announced the start of the eighth phase of a special operation against the militants of the Islamic State (an organization whose activities are banned in the Russian Federation), Kurdistan.ru reports on December 29.
    According to journalists, the purpose of the special operation is to cleanse the provinces of Nineveh, Salahuddin, Diyala and Kirkuk from the influence of terrorists.
    From the very beginning of the operation, many terrorist shelters, their military equipment, as well as manpower, were already destroyed. Killed several representatives of the armed forces of the country.

    as I understand it, serious partisan activity in oil-bearing areas is expected
    1. -1
      31 December 2019 16: 23
      It doesn’t matter who and what, the main thing is sanctions and what to impose on the country ...
      1. +1
        31 December 2019 16: 27
        everything is much simpler - world politics is connected with the internal politics of the USA - and here are the bases and the like, no matter how the presidential election is on the nose ...
  18. +2
    31 December 2019 14: 52
    Worthy of the application of experience. They killed a citizen - in response flew in spite of borders, international law and other nonsense for the weak.
  19. -1
    31 December 2019 15: 18
    Yellsiotone to the American Bosco! am negative Each state has an 11-point earthquake! Tired of these Yankees, even throw boots on the remote control. ... negative
  20. +1
    31 December 2019 15: 42
    Zadolbali with their wars, friends, today is the New Year! Ah yes at the table !!!
  21. -1
    31 December 2019 16: 14
    USA will help

    This cry, the main club of Israel!
    On the outskirts, I also remember yelling "The USA is with us", but something went wrong and thank God!
  22. -2
    31 December 2019 16: 19
    Iran is our neighbor and we need peace - we support Iran. Israel is our friend in the fight against fascism and we support Israel. But give us the crime, the pilot who fled to Israel from Russia and that pilot, our guys died on the fault of IL 20.
    1. -4
      31 December 2019 17: 47
      Iran is our neighbor
      Russia and Iran have no common borders, land on the word at all, and the Caspian is not so simple - it is shared by all the Caspian states, with the exception of their territorial waters. So, Iran is a neighbor to us like Sweden
      1. -1
        31 December 2019 21: 30
        Somewhere, yes, if you do not take into account such trifles as the use of Iranian airspace by our armed forces and the projection of Iranian forces on the American fleet and bases in the Persian Gulf.
        1. -1
          31 December 2019 21: 39
          Everything is called at the table.
          Happy New Year to all forum users and members of their families! Happiness Good luck. Good health and long life. drinks
    2. -4
      31 December 2019 19: 09
      Quote: Nikolai Alexandrovich
      that pilot, our guys died in IL 20 due to the fault of the kogorogo.

      The IL-20 was shot down by the Syrians - all claims to them.
      1. -1
        31 December 2019 21: 24
        Those who planned and executed are to blame.
  23. -1
    31 December 2019 18: 14
    Quote: Siberia 75
    Quote: Finches
    - Well, mom, I’m already 50 years old and I’ve been living with her for 30 years,

    I always believed that the USSR-Israel conflict was an unfortunate mistake that the US took full advantage of.

    Now there is a unique opportunity to correct the situation. It so happened that the first persons, as well as the military-political circles in the Russian Federation and Israel, in general, are very loyal and tolerant of each other at this stage. We won’t talk about the reasons, the facts speak ..
  24. 0
    31 December 2019 18: 21
    Quote: Maki Avellevich
    Quote: tracer
    Because the Jews chose another lord.

    Jews have only one lord. and the elections were a long time ago.

    In this plan, I agree. Something like Swiss neutrality. For many of our politicians, this is sitting somewhere in the subconscious, do not trust anyone, only yourself.
  25. -1
    31 December 2019 18: 39
    Quote: 30hgsa
    Propaganda is good, only you don’t need to believe in your propaganda. Iran of the 60s and Iran are now different states. Like Israel of the 60s, this is not modern Israel. In a direct collision, everything really ends quickly. The massive rocket fire by Iran of all critical Israeli objects, such as ports, power plants, airfields, will completely withdraw Israel from the game within a week. Israel is a compact state dependent on imports. Iran ... and Iran on the drum. Iran can withstand a much more brutal war and much more damage than Israel.

    // Massive rocket attack by Iran of all critical Israeli objects such as ports, power plants, airfields will completely withdraw Israel from the game within a week //
    This declaration of war, in fact, the whole world. So leave your crazy theories ..
    Do not forget at least the name of our capital. If it’s hard for you to give another.
  26. -2
    31 December 2019 18: 51
    Quote: Maz
    Yeah, they hit, they just betrayed that the US embassy was being stormed in Iraq

    Maz, you understand now is not good. If it's real Hezbollah.
    This is the last embassy to attack. Trump is not iron.
    The attack of the embassy in the first place is not legal.
    Secondly, it is terrorism.
    Thirdly...
  27. -2
    31 December 2019 20: 17
    Quote: Connor MacLeod
    Quote: Tuk77
    Do you mind if I join your opinion?
    Unfortunately, Arabs are no warriors. This became clear during the Six Day War.
    You can treat the Jews as you like, it’s everyone’s personal business, but you won’t take one from them - they are excellent fighters. It is a fact.

    During the Six Day Arabs beautifully capitalized what is, that is ... good


    Historical moment. Old city..
    1. -3
      31 December 2019 20: 35
      I had a military aspect in mind:


      Promptly ...
  28. 0
    31 December 2019 20: 39
    Quote: Finches
    Happy New Year! drinks

    Happy New Year. They did not buy a Christmas tree. Around the tangerines set the table. True today is 15 degrees ... Well, the main mood.
  29. -1
    31 December 2019 20: 43
    Quote: Connor MacLeod
    I had a military aspect in mind:


    Promptly ...

    I'm also talking about the military. For the one-eyed, it was a confirmation that he strategically did everything right. Check out the facial expression ..
  30. 0
    31 December 2019 21: 37
    Israel will not have to confront pro-Iranian forces alone, the US will help

    ABOUT ! This is no longer new. It was already - "the whole world is with us" fool
    It seems that Israel became pregnant from Ukrainian migrant workers. crying
    "Professor" - Hey! Happy New Year ! drinks
    1. -2
      31 December 2019 22: 25
      Quote: askort154
      ... It was already - "the whole world is with us"

      And after the six-day war, when they could not win the war, under the auspices of the USSR,
      in Moscow, a meeting of the leaders of the ruling parties and governments of Bulgaria, Hungary, East Germany, Poland, Romania, the USSR, Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia is held. and break off diplomatic relations with Israel (Romania abstained, and the GDR did not have diplomatic relations with Israel). And of course all the Arab states.
      And this war was lost.
      Israel has extensive experience BUT:
      Without friends, a little bit
      Without friends, a little bit
      And with friends a lot!(C)
      HAPPY NEW YEAR drinks good
      1. 0
        31 December 2019 23: 38
        Quote: Vitaly Gusin
        And this war was lost.

        THIS the war by the Arabs was lost. But in 1973 you already grabbed not sickly ...

        HOLIDAY GREETINGS! drinks
        1. -3
          1 January 2020 08: 44
          Quote: Connor Macleod
          But in 1973 you grabbed not sickly ...

          Unfortunately yes.
          This war was launched by the Arabs about the example of fascist Germany.
          Only not on Sunday at 4 o’clock in the morning, but more cruelly in Yem Kippur, when the radio does not work, television, transport does not work, the phones at that time were like in the USSR, it was very difficult to collect command staff and reservists all over the street and it took a lot of time. And they attacked from the south of Egypt, from the east of Jordan, from the north of Syria. Israel was completely surrounded, only the sea remained in the west, where they wanted to dump Israel. And they started not at 4 o’clock in the morning, but at two o’clock in the afternoon, when the sun was completely in the south and shone directly to the pilots.
          Well, and how it ended you know.
          Very similar to 1941.
          HAPPY NEW YEAR 2020.
          I wish you all. so that in the new year we would not have to look at each other like through a sight, but like at one table, DIRECTLY EYE IN EYE!
          1. -2
            1 January 2020 12: 01
            I join - World Peace! drinks

            Listen to my question to you:

            "We do not have nuclear weapons, but if necessary, we will definitely use them!" this quote is attributed to Golda Meir. Do you know when and under what circumstances she said this? Isn't it then? 1973? And did she say that at all?
            1. -3
              1 January 2020 13: 27
              Quote: Connor Macleod
              "We do not have nuclear weapons, but if necessary, we will definitely use them!" this quote is attributed to Golda Meir.

              Not much differently “Firstly, we do not have nuclear weapons, and secondly, if necessary, we will use it.” But when and for what reason I have not met.
              But in the Doomsday War, Gold Meer repeatedly appealed to the US government for military assistance, but received no answers. At that time, the US government was not very loyal to Israel (as Obama was). And at the most critical moment, she wrote a letter personally to Nixon that if military assistance was not provided in the shortest possible time and Israel was threatened with destruction, and she, as head of state, had no choice but to deliver a nuclear strike on Egypt, Syria and Moscow. Realizing that the USSR would not take long to deal and strike back at the United States, and this threatens a world nuclear war, Nixon immediately replied that military assistance was on its way.
  31. -1
    1 January 2020 16: 47
    The evening is no longer languishing bully
  32. 0
    1 January 2020 19: 47
    Samoy bolshoy ugrozoy miru v regione eto Israel.
  33. The comment was deleted.