The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine allowed Naftogaz to conclude a contract with PJSC Gazprom


The Ukrainian Cabinet of Ministers officially gave permission for Naftogaz to sign a contract with the Russian gas giant. It is about allowing gas transit through the country.


That's not all: Ukrainian ministers allowed Naftogaz to settle well-known disputes with a Russian pipeline gas supplier.

Some details. Naftogaz is allowed to conclude an agreement with Gazprom on the pipeline transportation of natural gas through Ukrainian territory. The time frame for the contract was established from 2020 to 2024. The company is also allowed to sign an agreement with Gazprom (global).

The Cabinet of Ministers thus gave the go-ahead for further commercial relations related to the transportation of gas to PJSC Gazprom.

Recall that the 2024th year is the year when the presidential election is to take place in Russia.
Photos used:
gazprom.ru
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Slavutich 31 December 2019 06: 47 New
    • 8
    • 4
    +4
    Naftogaz is allowed to conclude an agreement with Gazprom on the pipeline transportation of natural gas through Ukrainian territory.

    Allowed?
    It sounds a lot good
    1. Aerodrome 31 December 2019 07: 17 New
      • 9
      • 9
      0
      The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine allowed Naftogaz to conclude a contract with PJSC Gazprom
      well ... then Miller, can afford to give his wife a new year, stainless steel earrings, and some sort of boat for himself.
      1. Victoria-V 31 December 2019 07: 39 New
        • 6
        • 4
        +2
        Is platinum a stainless metal?
        1. aszzz888 31 December 2019 08: 31 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Victoria-V (Victoria) Today, 07:39 AM NEW
          +1
          Is platinum a stainless metal?

          Platinum (Pt from Latin Platinum) - a chemical element of the 10th group (according to an outdated classification - a side subgroup of the eighth group), the 6th period of the periodic system of chemical elements, with atomic number 78; brilliant noble metal of silver-white color. Chemical properties
          Covalent radius 130 pm
          Ion radius (+ 4e) 65 (+ 2e) 80 pm
          Electronegativity 2,28 (Pauling scale)
          Electrode potential Pt ← Pt2 + 1,20 V
          Oxidation states 4, 2, 0
          Ionization energy
          (first electron) 868,1 (9,00) kJ / mol (eV)

          Something like this. hi
          1. Victoria-V 31 December 2019 09: 06 New
            • 4
            • 6
            -2
            I'm talking about earrings for Miller’s wife, and you are talking about oxidation states)
            1. Mordvin 3 31 December 2019 11: 21 New
              • 3
              • 0
              +3
              Quote: Victoria-In
              I'm talking about earrings for Miller's wife

              If it rusted, Kaganovich was unlikely to insert dental crowns from platinum. wink
        2. Earth 31 December 2019 09: 53 New
          • 2
          • 2
          0
          Quote: Victoria-In
          Is platinum a stainless metal?

          noble metals do not oxidize (do not rust) in the atmosphere.
          Inorganic chemistry. 8th grade of the Soviet school.
          1. Victoria-V 31 December 2019 15: 17 New
            • 1
            • 1
            0
            Speak - do not rust? If you do not understand the irony, then I will explain what rust is. These are red iron oxides, which are formed during the reaction of iron with oxygen or the reaction of iron with chlorine in the absence of oxygen. And platinum is a very interesting metal, for the production of which a lot of alcohol and sugar are spent ...
            1. Earth 31 December 2019 21: 41 New
              • 1
              • 2
              -1
              Quote: Victoria-In
              If you do not understand the irony, then I will explain what rust is.

              not worth it. The SOVIET school readily explained to me inorganic chemistry.
              In your cases, platinum was used because it is also more expensive.
              More expensive than gold.
              For dental purposes, there are various cheap and expensive products.
      2. Incognito777 31 December 2019 12: 51 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        June 28, 2015, 21:14 / Business

        New contract for gas transit through Ukraine will not be concluded under any circumstances, even if the moon becomes the sun, said two weeks ago the deputy chairman of the board of Gazprom, Alexander Medvedev. Gazprom, after 2019, will refuse to transit gas through Ukraine - deliveries will be redirected to the Turkish Stream, Alexey Miller announced Gazprom’s presidency in April. He promised that Gazprom would build the Turkish Stream to the Greek border, and then Europe must pull the pipes itself if, after 2019, it does not want to be left without Russian gas.

        “Let's be clear,” Miller said last Friday. “We never said that we would not negotiate with Ukraine on a [new] transit contract.” The problem is, he explained, that Ukraine offers unacceptable conditions, and its position is irreconcilable. In particular, Ukraine wants to increase the transit tariff from the current $ 2,7 to $ 5 per 1000 cubic meters. m per 100 km. But when the contract ends, Gazprom will negotiate its extension. And there is a direct mandate from Russian President Vladimir Putin, Miller emphasized.

        The president decided to reassure the Europeans after harsh statements from Gazprom’s leadership about the intention to hold a gas pause, East European Gas Analysis director Mikhail Korchemkin believes, but tough statements were also initiated by Putin.

        It follows from Miller's words that, speaking of the “termination” of transit after 2019, Gazprom informed counterparties in advance of the risks. Miller reiterated that if gas transmission capacities did not appear for the Turkish Stream by the EU by 2019, Gazprom would not conclude an unprofitable contract with Ukraine.



        As a result, everything was signed, and 3 lardas also spit out .. and Europe itself wasn’t pulling any pipes ..
        1. major147 31 December 2019 14: 20 New
          • 0
          • 3
          -3
          Quote: Incognito777
          Europe itself does not pull any pipes ..

          And continuation on land SP-1 and SP-2, TP-2 also pull.
    2. Finches 31 December 2019 09: 12 New
      • 11
      • 3
      +8
      100% oligarchic conspiracy ... Russia gasify, benefactors!
      1. Vadim237 31 December 2019 13: 22 New
        • 3
        • 10
        -7
        You will find two tens of trillions rubles for the gasification of all 60000 non-gasified settlements throughout Russia - then the work will go. Or do you think that gasification is such a trifling job two times and is it ready?
        1. Finches 31 December 2019 13: 23 New
          • 5
          • 5
          0
          20 billion. Africans, 3 billion. Ukrainians ... And the Russians will suffer! In Russia, a lot of coal is mined, and the forest has not all been exported to China!
          1. Vadim237 31 December 2019 18: 08 New
            • 1
            • 5
            -4
            And did we receive these 20 billion USSR debts from Africa? It’s just that it will be much more efficient to heat coal and firewood in some places from an economic point of view — rather than pulling gas infrastructure there — even the USSR has not pulled it since the 60s, and you want Russia to pull it.
            1. Finches 31 December 2019 18: 11 New
              • 2
              • 1
              +1
              You are probably a shareholder of Gazprom - have all your dreams come true? laughing

              Well, do not despair - the Swiss company will complete the German money SP-2, which would sell Russian gas to Italian-Spanish consumers! And our villagers will economically continue to go to the woods for firewood! It is also more beneficial for health - you wave the ax in the cutting area, than not a healthy lifestyle laughing
              1. Vadim237 1 January 2020 14: 22 New
                • 1
                • 1
                0
                Russia supplies LNG to Italy. And yes, I am a shareholder of Gazprom and other large companies - and it’s not expensive to deliver gas to all the villages because it’s difficult to maintain this extended infrastructure because the service will not be cheap, people will simply refuse to pay for gas which will be more expensive than firewood and coal two, three times. You can build whatever you want and where you want - but whether it will be profitable from an economic and operational point of view for the builder and user is the most important question when creating any project.
                1. Finches 1 January 2020 14: 29 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  That is why I call capitalism an anti-people system - not for the convenience of people, but for the sake of economic expediency! At the forefront is not Man, as under Socialism, but the Dollar - a soulless thing! And if so then, of course, you can sell the public domain - gas - to sell left and right ... True, who gave this right to a handful of shareholders? Why are just a few people in control of the public domain? Greed kills everything human in the soul, like a virus - here it is the sacred essence of capitalism - soullessness!
                  All this, of course, is philosophical, but nevertheless - even if the Italian lives well, it is economically profitable, but the Russian people in Yakutia and go for firewood - there is nothing to be lazy! laughing
                  Just ask you not to put labels on me right away - it's to the doctor, etc. Just think it over!
        2. Pereira 31 December 2019 14: 22 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          Yes, there is not much to steal in the gasification of the village. Therefore it is not interesting.
    3. Pereira 31 December 2019 14: 21 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Miller is now nidding.
  2. Kleber 31 December 2019 06: 49 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    The Ukrainian cabinet only voiced the opinion of the metropolis.
    1. antivirus 31 December 2019 08: 30 New
      • 1
      • 3
      -2
      yes, from the mother country
      I am amazed by the attention to gas (Gazprom and USAspg) our gas is the first step in the industry of Germany, followed by electricity and energy, then petrochemicals and machine building - and ON EXIT EXPORT TO THE WINNER OF WWII-FRANCE, USA, VL. BRITAN AND ETC. what the Germans allowed - that’s what they’re doing.
      Who will allow the shutdown of nuclear power plants (Franz and the USA delivered reactors)?
      - how much is the disposal?
      and where to store the waste? -
      and former feeders will give the electric power market to Russian gas?
      How much does an all-gas transition cost ?????
      whose turbines and other equipment will be ?????? - this is more gas
      WE ARE ON THE FIRST STEP OF DIVISION OF LABOR WITH GAS, STILL 3.
      and Germany only paid for WWII, but everything was paid for WWII?
      the cohols did as they were told-they will get the carrot, and they will give them to Putin ..
      after a new bargain of the US-China deal will the bargain of the US-EU bargain be reserved ??? I know in whose favor? - only the refusal of calls to EU ports the US Navy will save from a new "fair deal" (like with China) -that will not happen.
      and there are still 10 or 40 questions for 10-30 years in advance on such topics.
      gas is a trifle on a global scale.
      the mother country allowed us and the EU to feed a little bit.
      they just didn’t eat us.
      all difficulties are ahead.
  3. Guru 31 December 2019 06: 57 New
    • 4
    • 1
    +3
    The 2024th is the year when the presidential election is to take place in Russia.
    There is nothing good about it, from the word at all. There will be political games to the detriment of their own interests. The elections are not only in Russia, but also in Ukraine.
    1. Kleber 31 December 2019 07: 08 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Political games are even predictable. But who will be the next president? And then we get some sort of Boris Yeltsin ...
      1. Guru 31 December 2019 07: 14 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        They’ve scrambled for battle, but the fact that they will spoil him (If he is not from the GDP team) is quite expected
        1. Gray brother 31 December 2019 07: 39 New
          • 4
          • 4
          0
          Again, bulk voters will not be allowed before the election?
          1. Guru 31 December 2019 07: 41 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Well, then they can’t prevent voters. I’m thinking about something else, Putin’s receiver "Will you lead by the handle?"
            1. Gray brother 31 December 2019 07: 47 New
              • 6
              • 17
              -11
              Quote: Guru
              I’m thinking about something else, Putin’s receiver "Will you lead by the handle?"

              It would be nice. I would vote for Shoigu.
              1. mark1 31 December 2019 07: 58 New
                • 17
                • 3
                +14
                Quote: Gray Brother
                I would vote for Shoigu.

                I wouldn’t ...
                1. Siberian 66 31 December 2019 08: 18 New
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  +6
                  Something Medvedev began to PR .. This is not good ...
                  1. mark1 31 December 2019 08: 30 New
                    • 4
                    • 0
                    +4
                    Everything is expected. the fact that the new personality, as a devil jumps out of the box, is extremely unlikely.
                    Early departure of one, temporary substitution (before the election) by another. Over the pre-election period, the abolition of some unpopular decision ... and now, bonnets flew into the air at the elections!
                  2. Sergst 31 December 2019 09: 39 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    "no money, but you hold on"? This one is unlikely, everyone has already gotten his own, to put it mildly, incompetence.
                  3. The comment was deleted.
                2. Gray brother 31 December 2019 08: 47 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  Quote: mark1
                  I wouldn’t ...

                  There is no court.
                3. qQQQ 31 December 2019 09: 12 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Quote: mark1
                  I wouldn’t ...

                  I wouldn’t vote too, now there’s a lot of PR, but I would become one solid.
              2. Flooding 31 December 2019 10: 09 New
                • 1
                • 3
                -2
                Quote: Gray Brother
                It would be nice. I would vote for Shoigu.

                Announce the entire list, please.
                Perhaps I didn’t see anyone in the crowd.
                But of those that are in sight, Shoigu is not the worst candidate.
            2. Thrifty 31 December 2019 08: 01 New
              • 1
              • 6
              -5
              Guru, his successor now commands Belarus!
              1. Guru 31 December 2019 10: 19 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                I'm afraid the Belarusian version of the age limit will not work laughing
          2. major147 31 December 2019 14: 23 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Gray Brother
            Again, bulk voters will not be allowed before the election?

            And why bulk !? Come on Biden right away!
        2. major147 31 December 2019 14: 22 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Guru
          They’ve scrambled for battle, but the fact that they will spoil him (If he is not from the GDP team) is quite expected

          All will spoil each other ....
  4. Thrifty 31 December 2019 08: 03 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    We can say goodbye, the economic independence of Russia, and so the country will sit on a gas pipe! By the way, having not yet received gas, ukroin will reduce the price for it for the population. ...
  5. thinker 31 December 2019 08: 08 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Naftogaz is allowed to conclude an agreement with Gazprom ...

    What kind of floridity? “Russia and Ukraine signed a gas transit contract,” short and clear.
    https://ria.ru/20191231/1563035576.html
  6. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 31 December 2019 08: 16 New
    • 6
    • 8
    -2
    Shame on Gazprom. This money will go to dill to kill the children of Donetsk and Lugansk. This is aiding, that is, economic assistance to the fascist regime of Ukraine.
    1. Kleber 31 December 2019 08: 45 New
      • 2
      • 3
      -1
      Steal. And on anti-terrorist operation volunteers SMSkami gather up.
      1. Lelek 31 December 2019 19: 59 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Kleber
        Steal. And on anti-terrorist operation volunteers SMSkami gather up.

        hi
        The money from Gazprom will go to pay off partly external debts, and partly (unofficial) debts to the thief and provocateur Soros (this one is never invested without a prospect for bakshish). Here is what Voloshin, a deputy of the Rada of the former Ukraine, writes about Soros and “pigs”:
    2. Flooding 31 December 2019 10: 12 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
      Shame on Gazprom. This money will go to dill to kill the children of Donetsk and Lugansk. This is aiding, that is, economic assistance to the fascist regime of Ukraine.

      Is this a slogan? No one is happy with what is happening.
      But do not go to such an extreme.
      If you think in these categories, it’s a shame for everyone who buys Ukrainian goods, because this money goes ... and further on with your slogans.
      By the way, what about the supply of Ukrainian components for the needs of the Russian defense industry?
      Is it a shame for those who buy American goods?
      And to those who drink Georgian wine?
    3. major147 31 December 2019 14: 24 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK
      Shame on Gazprom. This money will go to dill to kill the children of Donetsk and Lugansk. This is aiding, that is, economic assistance to the fascist regime of Ukraine.

      Your suggestion!!??
  7. The popuas 31 December 2019 08: 22 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Do not recognize Miller in the photo
    1. rich 31 December 2019 14: 50 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Popuas (Maxim): Do not recognize Miller in the photo

      Will be rich (nar.premeta) yes
  8. rocket757 31 December 2019 08: 22 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine allowed Naftogaz to conclude a contract with PJSC Gazprom

    Event with long-term consequences!
    And so, in fact, business and a lot of about political games.
  9. BAI
    BAI 31 December 2019 08: 43 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Yesterday, negotiations stalled. But yesterday, Putin and Trump had a telephone conversation. After that, the contract was immediately concluded. Coincidence?
    1. Gray brother 31 December 2019 08: 51 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: BAI
      Coincidence?

      Yes, there are many coincidences. They gave the Swiss a month, and the Ukrainian national bank already held an auction for these lards and there they pushed 1,5 or 2 to anyone at the preferential rate)))
    2. Kleber 31 December 2019 08: 56 New
      • 6
      • 1
      +5
      Rather a coincidence. SP-2 is not completed, and obligations to European countries under gas contracts must be fulfilled. The calendar dictates the terms.
      1. Lelek 31 December 2019 20: 04 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: Kleber
        SP-2 is not completed, and it is necessary to fulfill obligations to European countries under gas contracts

        hi
        And the "Europeans" chew snot and are foolish about independent politics and economics:
  10. Semurg 31 December 2019 09: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Unclear. It seems like Naftogaz has not been engaged in the transit of Russian gas since the new year, there it seems that the new structure will be engaged in transit, and the agreement is concluded according to an article by Gazprom and Naftogaz. Naftogaz participated in the negotiations as a plaintiff to receive 3 yards of Baku by decision of the arbitration and, having received them, recalled suits for another 7 or 8 yards.
    1. Leshy1975 31 December 2019 12: 42 New
      • 4
      • 3
      +1
      [
      Quote: Semurg
      Unclear. It seems like Naftogaz has not been engaged in the transit of Russian gas since the new year, there it seems that the new structure will be engaged in transit, and the agreement is concluded according to an article by Gazprom and Naftogaz. Naftogaz participated in the negotiations as a plaintiff to receive 3 yards of Baku by decision of the arbitration and, having received them, recalled suits for another 7 or 8 yards.

      And Naftogaz is now only the organizer of transit and officially has no relation to the GTS. But it will have its profit over the pumping rate. Hence the discrepancy in numbers, when, according to the data from the Russian Federation, the pumping rate itself did not seem to increase very much, and according to some information (from the Ukrainian side) it was almost a half to two times. True, it can still be including due to the fact that the tariff is defined for a minimum certain amount, and all over, at a higher tariff. Well, since there is no SP-2 and Turetsky either, then you’ll get a higher one. Well, plus the condition - download or pay. Previously, Gazprom could afford to take or pay, but now the opposite is true. That’s what happened at Gazprom trouble victory. hi
    2. dgonni 31 December 2019 14: 11 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Proof is it possible?
  11. Gennady Fomkin 31 December 2019 10: 59 New
    • 2
    • 5
    -3
    At the same time, 3/4 of the GTS personnel fly out into the street, and taking into account the multiplier effect of maintaining a complex system, it’s even bigger. Not only does the GTS dough raise less, but the state’s liabilities in the form of those dismissed are increasing. laughing Probably some tricky Miller plan wassat
  12. Gennady Fomkin 31 December 2019 11: 05 New
    • 2
    • 4
    -2
    We’ll complete the flows, the problem will go away, and the Ukrainians will also be Europe by European rules! laughing lol
    1. Leshy1975 31 December 2019 13: 12 New
      • 5
      • 2
      +3
      Quote: Gennady Fomkin
      We’ll complete the flows, the problem will go away, and the Ukrainians will also be Europe by European rules! laughing lol

      Be sure to finish it. Just take a yacht from one of the oligarchs for temporary use, supply the necessary pipe-laying equipment, and the positioning system is probably there, and we’ll finish it right away. Look at Abramovich, 162 m long. The normal size, will probably fit.
      And even if we don’t finish building it and write it off, then it’s okay too, you’re Genady and explain to all of us that you did it even better. They hoped for our gas, but we lured them and left with nothing. I understand your attitude correctly? Fluctuations along with the party line.
      Well, so that you would have something to compare your bravura comments with (source El-Murid blog):

      The results of the last round of the gas war for the European market are still a little early to draw, since the Kremlin has several purely theoretical moves in store, how it can slightly correct its prestige that has collapsed into nowhere. But in general, the score on the scoreboard after this half seems simply devastating. Despite assurances of a complete cessation of transit (which were then transformed into no less solid “15 billion cubic meters and a dot”), transit was kept at a fairly high level (all declared pumping volumes - 65 billion in the first year and 40 in the following years are minimal, i.e. real transit will be higher). $ 3 billion debt recognized and paid by arbitration. The contract is concluded for a period of five years, and not for a year.
      Bypass routes around Ukraine are completely failed. And in terms of volume and timing. The Turkish stream "cringed" twice as planned, and the transit pipe was built, but not put into operation, the pipe to the domestic Turkish market lost its meaning, since Turkey managed to reduce the volume of Russian gas imports to the size of the regular capacity of the already operating Blue Stream - 15 billion cubic meters of TP actually built, oriented to Turkey, have now become simply standby. Transit through Turkey to Europe is expected only in May 2020, but only if Bulgaria completes pipe laying and their integration with existing systems on its territory by this time.
      Nord Stream-2 is not just failed in terms of commissioning, and its construction has not even been completed. With extremely obscure prospects that the Kremlin prefers not to talk about now.
      Thus, out of the planned 118 billion cubic meters of capacity, in reality only 15 can be launched from tomorrow, but even their occupancy seems uncertain. Gazprom's level of efficiency in the European direction looks almost equal to zero. Strategic planning is completely failed.
      Gazprom’s visible success can be called the Power of Siberia, but the project itself raises a lot of questions of exactly the same property - the constructed pipeline even official applications have a too long payback period, and given the real situation, they are likely to never pay off at all.
      The foregoing is not gloating, but the usual statement. Actually, there is nothing to gloat about - all these failures will be paid at our expense. In addition, Gazprom is not a business, and therefore it makes no sense to approach it from this point of view. Gazprom is just common ...
      Therefore, the authorities have no complaints about the leadership of Gazprom and cannot be - it is doing its real job quite successfully. The country's national wealth is exported, the money received for it goes where it is needed and who needs it, the population pays for current losses. What are the problems?

      PS And you Genadius rejoice, rejoice, and really there is a reason, what kind of near-minded people
      these are the Europeans
      hi
      1. Vadim237 31 December 2019 13: 24 New
        • 2
        • 6
        -4
        "Nord Stream-2 is not just failed in terms of commissioning, and its construction has not even been completed. With extremely unclear prospects, which the Kremlin now prefers not to spread." The pipeline will be completed and launched very clearly throughout the year.
        1. Leshy1975 31 December 2019 13: 53 New
          • 6
          • 3
          +3
          Quote: Vadim237
          "Nord Stream-2 is not just failed in terms of commissioning, and its construction has not even been completed. With extremely unclear prospects, which the Kremlin now prefers not to spread." The pipeline will be completed and launched very clearly throughout the year.

          It will be completed just as accurately during the year as
          assurances of a complete cessation of transit (which then transformed into the equally solid "15 billion cubic meters and a dot")
          .
          Vadim, are you not funny? After everything that happened to Gazprom, after all these assurances from the leadership of the Russian Federation and Gazprom, which in fact turned out to be the very opposite result. To give any guarantees, or does the fate of the previous guarantees teach nothing?
          You don’t know what to do here? Either laugh at this circus, or cry, because there is a complete inadequacy (in relation to reality) of statements and actions.
          From statements (source MK): Russian Foreign Ministry Spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said at a briefing that Russia answer mirror on US sanctions against the construction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

          Mirror is how? Ban US export of LNG to Europe? Or what will forbid? I understand when diplomats are expelled in a mirror, but what mirror can there be?
          Maybe this is mirroring (source russian.rt.com):
          As a response to US sanctions against the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline project, the Russian side may expand the list of American citizens who are denied entry to Russia. This was stated by Deputy Foreign Minister of Russia Sergey Ryabkov.
          “The answer will be found, it can be in the form of expanding our stop lists for entering Russia.

          They were very frightened by such "mirroring" of American politicians and officials. It is they from us (and not ours from them) who purchase real estate, settle relatives and obtain citizenship. So, will we laugh or cry?

          Well, from inappropriate actions, even easier. If it all came to this, and the United States announced its great desire to stop SP-2 for a long time. Why didn’t the preparatory measures for readiness for independent completion of the gas pipeline be carried out? Namely, the retrofitting of the vessel and its distillation closer to the place of work. And these people (Gazprom management), and you including give any guarantees, even for a whole year?
          When during the time they could not even ask such an elementary question: how will we finish building if the sanctions will be developed according to option A, option B, option C?

          PS Laughter through tears. laughing crying Situation from the category: how to control the World without attracting the attention of orderlies.
          1. Vadim237 31 December 2019 18: 39 New
            • 0
            • 5
            -5
            Judging by your hysteria, you definitely need orderlies - Nord Stream 2 will be completed; it’s a fact. as well as for the disruption of deliveries to Europe, as well as maintaining supplies in the right volumes, got rid of financial claims - officially, from Ukraine and Naftogaz it is now responsible for transit volumes of gas, which will already complicate theft of gas by Ukraine, Gazprom was able to place additional securities on the European market, without fear that they will be confiscated. Retrofitting a vessel with what? - We’ll have to create a new pipelayer in this case - which is no longer needed, since Russia will no longer put new gas pipelines, as it will increase LNG production to 27 million tons by 120, now Russia occupies 2035% of the LNG market in Europe, and the United States is 20%, and it’s like, on the drum, which officials in the United States get a miserly amount of such officials today, he’s an official - tomorrow he’s not an official of sanction of option C, they are already a little good - after the holidays, the construction of the gas pipeline will continue with our vessel. Less snot, panic, and all moans.
  13. Gennady Fomkin 31 December 2019 11: 11 New
    • 1
    • 6
    -5
    It was smooth on paper, but forgot about the ravines) Although what I mean, it's the Europeans) laughing
  14. Ratmir_Ryazan 31 December 2019 11: 25 New
    • 4
    • 6
    -2
    The conclusion of a transit agreement with the payment of a debt of $ 3 billion to Naftogaz is a shame and betrayal of both Gazprom and Russia !!!

    For a whole year Miller, Novak, Kozak and other officials cheated that until there were no complaints against Gazprom, there would be no transit, and then they caved in under Bandera’s power and Nord Stream stopped us and we gave the money and signed a transit agreement ...

    HOLIDAYS !!!

    It was necessary to endure !!! No claim cancellation - no transit !!! To supply as much gas to Europe as it goes through the Yamal, North 1 and Turkish stream, then North 2 would be completed in a moment with our position would be considered.

    They just wiped their feet about Russia and us ...
  15. 75 Sergey 31 December 2019 12: 02 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    It’s just a funeral!
    Interestingly, will anyone from Gazpoom, and the government, resign or at least some top managers will be fired?
  16. sgr291158 31 December 2019 12: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They will steal again.
  17. Gennady Fomkin 31 December 2019 13: 14 New
    • 2
    • 3
    -1
    Quote: Leshy1975
    Quote: Gennady Fomkin
    We’ll complete the flows, the problem will go away, and the Ukrainians will also be Europe by European rules! laughing lol

    Be sure to finish it. Just take a yacht from one of the oligarchs for temporary use, supply the necessary pipe-laying equipment, and the positioning system is probably there, and we’ll finish it right away. Look at Abramovich, 162 m long. The normal size, will probably fit.
    And even if we don’t finish building it and write it off, then it’s okay too, you’re Genady and explain to all of us that you did it even better. They hoped for our gas, but we lured them and left with nothing. I understand your attitude correctly? Fluctuations along with the party line.
    Well, so that you would have something to compare your bravura comments with (source El-Murid blog):

    The results of the last round of the gas war for the European market are still a little early to draw, since the Kremlin has several purely theoretical moves in store, how it can slightly correct its prestige that has collapsed into nowhere. But in general, the score on the scoreboard after this half seems simply devastating. Despite assurances of a complete cessation of transit (which were then transformed into no less solid “15 billion cubic meters and a dot”), transit was kept at a fairly high level (all declared pumping volumes - 65 billion in the first year and 40 in the following years are minimal, i.e. real transit will be higher). $ 3 billion debt recognized and paid by arbitration. The contract is concluded for a period of five years, and not for a year.
    Bypass routes around Ukraine are completely failed. And in terms of volume and timing. The Turkish stream "cringed" twice as planned, and the transit pipe was built, but not put into operation, the pipe to the domestic Turkish market lost its meaning, since Turkey managed to reduce the volume of Russian gas imports to the size of the regular capacity of the already operating Blue Stream - 15 billion cubic meters of TP actually built, oriented to Turkey, have now become simply standby. Transit through Turkey to Europe is expected only in May 2020, but only if Bulgaria completes pipe laying and their integration with existing systems on its territory by this time.
    Nord Stream-2 is not just failed in terms of commissioning, and its construction has not even been completed. With extremely obscure prospects that the Kremlin prefers not to talk about now.
    Thus, out of the planned 118 billion cubic meters of capacity, in reality only 15 can be launched from tomorrow, but even their occupancy seems uncertain. Gazprom's level of efficiency in the European direction looks almost equal to zero. Strategic planning is completely failed.
    Gazprom’s visible success can be called the Power of Siberia, but the project itself raises a lot of questions of exactly the same property - the constructed pipeline even official applications have a too long payback period, and given the real situation, they are likely to never pay off at all.
    The foregoing is not gloating, but the usual statement. Actually, there is nothing to gloat about - all these failures will be paid at our expense. In addition, Gazprom is not a business, and therefore it makes no sense to approach it from this point of view. Gazprom is just common ...
    Therefore, the authorities have no complaints about the leadership of Gazprom and cannot be - it is doing its real job quite successfully. The country's national wealth is exported, the money received for it goes where it is needed and who needs it, the population pays for current losses. What are the problems?

    PS And you Genadius rejoice, rejoice, and really there is a reason, what kind of near-minded people
    these are the Europeans
    hi
    Whistle whistle - while good laughing
  18. Mentat 31 December 2019 15: 00 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    Quote: Aerodrome
    The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine allowed Naftogaz to conclude a contract with PJSC Gazprom
    well ... then Miller, can afford to give his wife a new year, stainless steel earrings, and some sort of boat for himself.

    This means that the company is doing well and can consistently pay taxes to the state budget.
    And you have some habits of a secular lioness - to discuss with your girlfriends what kind of earrings were given to someone, what kind of car a friend of your friend bought. Are you not from Ksyushechka Sobchak's girlfriends, by any chance?

    And yes, a leader of that rank should to be able to give his wife a valuable gift, and also, if desired, to purchase a little car, a boat, and even, oh God, a yacht. Because Gazprom is the world's largest gas production and transportation company, which affects not only the Russian, but also the global economy, as well as global politics. Such people should be financially secure, this should not distract them, this is a very responsible post.

    Your periodic blathering on the forum is not a topic, similar to what you wrote, do not carry anything useful, on the contrary, they play a destructive role.
  19. fa2998 31 December 2019 15: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Vadim237
    You will find two tens of trillions rubles for the gasification of all 60000 non-gasified settlements throughout Russia - then the work will go. Or do you think that gasification is such a trifling job two times and is it ready?

    Well, if capitals from Russia were not withdrawn, they ended up with great generosity to the debts of other countries, they tamed their top managers (otherwise they are already issuing a premium to them in billions), money will appear, and we will gasify a little. laughing hi
  20. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 31 December 2019 16: 16 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Zadolbali dill minus. Not dill like that, Their minions. Russians don’t do that.
  21. Sailor 31 December 2019 16: 28 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Apparently Frau Merkel called the “KVNschik” and explained properly about the consequences if she horned.
  22. VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK 1 January 2020 08: 31 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Whoever minuses me is the one for killing the children of Donbas! Dill - the gentry is not finished. There aren’t any Arabs. There are fascists who hate Russia. Glory to Ukraine sounds like Zig Heil. God forgive me to write such a thing. And the money is still for killing children
    . They are still driving dill across Russia and people have been killed. Putin doesn’t know how to do it. You have a vital matter to show. People need to be friends, Anya must cave in under fascist regimes. All good and no war.
  23. iouris 4 January 2020 17: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Successful photo: the entire modern geopolitical alignment in the palm of Miller's hand.