Twenty years on the post. Vladimir Putin congratulated Ramzan Kadyrov

94

Before the New Year, R. Kadyrov congratulated the President of the Russian Federation V. Putin on the network for his twentieth birthday as head of state and highlighted his fight against international terrorism and his contribution to stability and peace.

In his Telegram, the leader of Chechnya, on behalf of the republic, expressed gratitude to V. Putin for the victory over terrorism, for peace, for stability.



According to Ramzan Kadyrov, V.V. Putin headed the state 20 years ago, during the most difficult time for the country. The head of the republic recalled that in those years, Russia was seized by a crisis, and not just a crisis: at that time, chaos reigned in the economy.

As for Chechnya, there in these years there was "international terrorism", whose goal was the destruction of the Russian state. However, the new leader had the courage to accept responsibility for the whole country. The president coped with this great task brilliantly: he put in order "order in all areas."

Terrorism was destroyed, the integrity of the state was maintained. It was under Putin’s leadership that Russia, having passed a series of tests, turned into a strong power.
94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -20
    31 December 2019 06: 28
    Well!
    For the third dozen!
    1. +27
      31 December 2019 06: 30
      Better for life winked
      1. 0
        31 December 2019 06: 33
        Quote: Kleber
        Better for life winked

        Somehow ambiguous sounded)
        1. +8
          31 December 2019 07: 17
          It sounded great! How it sounded! drinks "A tear of a Komsomol member"
    2. +1
      31 December 2019 06: 43
      And I drank it immediately!
      1. +6
        31 December 2019 10: 28
        Quote: Victor_B
        And I drank it immediately!

        And I considered myself the only loving Erofeev laughing
  2. -8
    31 December 2019 06: 33
    Well, Joseph Vissarionovich - he was at the helm for almost 30 years.
    So - there is someone to follow)
    1. +13
      31 December 2019 06: 39
      Quote: Mytholog
      Well, Joseph Vissarionovich - he was at the helm for almost 30 years.
      So - there is someone to follow)

      Do you think I.V. Stalin from Kadyrov would accept congratulations? Please do not compare Stalin with Putin .. they do not even stand nearby.
      1. +12
        31 December 2019 06: 44
        1. I KNOW that I.V. Stalin received congratulations from the heads of the Union republics.
        2. With regards to "Please do not compare Stalin with Putin" - I will somehow figure it out without your prompts, whom and with whom to compare.
        3. I believed, believe and will continue to believe that Stalin, as the country's leader in difficult times, can and should be guided as an example by all current and future leaders of the country.
        1. +13
          31 December 2019 07: 11
          Quote: Mytholog
          I believed, I think and will continue to believe that Stalin, as the country's leader in difficult times, can and should be guided as an example by all current and future leaders of the country.

          Of course you need to navigate, I agree! But not to those who have already been at the helm for 20 years .. they have different guidelines .. unfortunately. They open monuments to Yeltsin ..
          Quote: Mytholog
          1. I KNOW that I.V. Stalin received congratulations from the heads of the Union republics.

          Naturally, but not from those who fought on the side of the militants ..
          1. +1
            31 December 2019 07: 17
            Quote: Svarog

            Naturally, but not from those who fought on the side of the militants ..


            Have you actually studied history at least a bit? Or only in liberal magazines?
            If anything, several former white officers and generals - then worked for the good of the country, and even at the military academy named after Frunze was taught.
            1. +9
              31 December 2019 07: 20
              Quote: Mytholog
              Have you actually studied history at least a bit? Or only in liberal magazines?
              If anything, several former white officers and generals - then worked for the good of the country, and even at the military academy named after Frunze was taught.

              Do not confuse terrorists with the white movement ..
              1. -2
                31 December 2019 07: 22
                Quote: Svarog

                Do not confuse terrorists with the white movement ..

                What? "White terror" - no, have you heard?
                1. +10
                  31 December 2019 07: 26
                  Quote: Mytholog
                  Quote: Svarog

                  Do not confuse terrorists with the white movement ..

                  What? "White terror" - no, have you heard?

                  "Whites" are monarchists, they defended the state system that existed in Russia for more than one hundred years. What did Kadyrov defend when he fought on the side of terrorists and mercenaries from different countries? And hence another question ... what attitude would Stalin have towards him ... we started with this ...
                  1. -8
                    31 December 2019 07: 35
                    "Whites" are monarchists, they defended the state system that existed in Russia for more than one hundred years.

                    As it is in the classics of cinema ... "When you say, Ivan Vasilievich, it feels like you are delusional."
                    Whites simply exterminated people on an industrial scale. And pompous nonsense about "high motives" - it is nonsense. Forgive me for being straightforward.
                  2. +8
                    31 December 2019 09: 38
                    "Whites" are monarchists, they defended the state system that existed in Russia for more than one hundred years.
                    I seem to have missed something from the new historical "discoveries". Until then, it was generally accepted that monarchists were only a part of this movement.
                    Maybe this is from the same series as the Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, overthrew the tsar ...
                  3. +3
                    31 December 2019 09: 54
                    In the White movement of convinced monarchists there were one, two and miscalculated. It is enough to say that one of the founders of the White movement, General Alekseev, was one of those who forced the emperor to abdicate.
                2. +3
                  31 December 2019 10: 07
                  Can you recall the red terror? There is even a decree about him
              2. +7
                31 December 2019 08: 52
                Quote: Svarog
                Do not confuse terrorists with the white movement ..

                A terrorist, in whatever movement he is not thrust into, will remain a terrorist. Be it "white", "red" or "green". You, as far as I understand, give preference to - "black"
                1. +3
                  31 December 2019 08: 53
                  Quote: Tersky
                  The terrorist, in which movement do not put him, will remain a terrorist

                  About that and speech ..
                  As far as I understand, you prefer - "black"

                  I am for the reds.
                  1. 0
                    31 December 2019 08: 54
                    Quote: Svarog
                    I am for the reds.

                    With a black edging on the edge of the field?
                    1. +3
                      31 December 2019 08: 55
                      Quote: Tersky
                      Quote: Svarog
                      I am for the reds.

                      With a black edging on the field.

                      Black humor at you Tersky ..
                      1. +1
                        31 December 2019 08: 57
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Black humor at you Tersky ..

                        At least I have it, but you do not have it at all, continuous tears of Yaroslavna. In whatever commentary stick, one and the same "song of the" petrel "...
                      2. +6
                        31 December 2019 09: 00
                        Quote: Tersky
                        At least I have it, but you do not have it at all, continuous tears of Yaroslavna. In whatever commentary stick, one and the same "song of the" petrel "...

                        There are different songs .. but I don’t see reasons for fun and joy, and therefore I write, as I understand, see and feel. I am not trying to paint grass, unlike you and your associates.
                      3. 0
                        31 December 2019 09: 15
                        Quote: Svarog
                        I am not trying to paint grass, unlike you and your associates.

                        Do not ascribe your merits to me, you are our "artist" in the style of Dark Art. And unsurpassed.
                      4. +5
                        31 December 2019 11: 19
                        Black humor at you Tersky
                        He is behind the white of the baker’s bakers, and what does he have the rules on the site their if you are for the reds, you can get a warning, and if you are for the whites, you can insult your opponents ...
                      5. +1
                        31 December 2019 11: 25
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        what does he have to do with the rules on the site? If you are for the Reds, you can get a warning, and if for the White ones, you can insult opponents ...

                        This is yes .. a well-known fact .. when the moderator so clearly supports the bakeries .. at the same time, he also merges the info, with all kinds of cat-consultants
                      6. -2
                        31 December 2019 12: 00
                        Quote: Svarog
                        at the same time, it also merges info, to all sorts of kotokonsultantamanuil ..

                        Do you have any confirmed and uncontested evidence and facts? Give, if they will not be, I will take care of your person up to the involvement under Art. 128.1. Criminal Code
                      7. +8
                        31 December 2019 12: 28
                        Do you have any confirmed and uncontested evidence and facts?

                        Yes, too lazy to poke around in correspondence, but Golovan had information about who was plus, and he laid out scans, and judging by the fact that you clearly support him, it’s not difficult to guess from whom .. only the administration or moderator can see who who pluses minus ..
                        Bring, if they will not be, I will be concerned about your person until the involvement under paragraph 2 of Art. 129 of the Criminal Code.

                        Apparently you have no more worries .. worry about your health ..
                      8. -2
                        31 December 2019 13: 43
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Yes, too lazy to poke around in correspondence,

                        You are not lazy, you simply do not have any facts since they are not in nature either. This is called simply enough - slander contained in a public speech, a publicly displayed work or the media.
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Golovan’s got information about who is pluses, and he uploaded scans, and judging by the fact that you clearly support him, it’s not difficult to guess from whom ..

                        laughing Himself not funny? Those. Will you publish slander against me that allegedly, for the sake of personal sympathy, I transmit to the site user service information while guided by speculation ?. What else do you think? Golovan Jack didn’t get enough information, but to expose me or someone else as an accomplice without having anything to do with this except for delusional conjectures. This is nonsense. To do this, there is a site administrator who is able to figure out where, how and when.
                        Quote: Svarog
                        Apparently you have no more worries ..

                        You don’t have them, but I added one more, but for the sake of justice I’ll sacrifice time.
                      9. +4
                        31 December 2019 13: 50
                        You are not lazy, you simply do not have any facts since they are not in nature either.

                        I have one fact when Golovan posted a screen and that screen was saved, but the information from the article where he posted it was deleted. This screen showed who I was plus and who I was minus. I really do not have the facts that you did it. But I no longer know the moderators who would support Golovan. Moreover, in the discussion on this topic, you were asked a direct question, about Golovan’s support, you didn’t answer anything ..
                        Himself not funny? Those. Will you publish slander against me that allegedly, for the sake of personal sympathy, I transmit to the site user service information while guided by speculation ?. What else do you think?

                        In general, I agree, I have no facts. For this I apologize. Holiday greetings!
                      10. -3
                        31 December 2019 11: 56
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        you can get a warning
                        Now you’ll get it, but not for white or red, but for
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        He is behind the white of the baker’s
                        to label is at least impudence, at most rudeness. And specify where I managed it
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        and if for white, then you can insult opponents ...
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        he has his own rules on the site
                        The rules on the site cannot be ours or strangers, they are the same for everyone, both for me and for you. Only now they completely suit me, but you are not. And one more thing to remember, it’s for me that it’s white, that red is somehow violet, but Russia is not.
                      11. +8
                        31 December 2019 12: 53
                        to label is at least impudence, at most rudeness
                        But
                        Do not ascribe your merits to me, you are our "artist" in the style of Dark Art. And unsurpassed.

                        about the crying of Yaroslavna, from the same opera
                        you, as at one time sanekromanov, imagined yourself an inviolable person. But I have already written more than once, you ignore the insults from those who are just like you for the "white". even if they insult our Motherland the Soviet Union our Soviet Victory in 1945.
                      12. -4
                        31 December 2019 13: 12
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        about the crying of Yaroslavna, from the same opera
                        Not really? So the same comparison, and the comparison, as you know, is always lame. Janusz Korczak, a well-known teacher, spoke even more sharply: "Let's put aside the comparisons, they are misleading," but the baker is a statement. Feel the difference?
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        l, you ignore the insults from those who are just like you for "white". even if they insult our Motherland the Soviet Union our Soviet Victory in 1945.

                        You will find a link to my "ignoring". I repeat once again that I am not for the red, nor for the white, nor for the violet, but for the order on the site.
                      13. +8
                        31 December 2019 13: 29
                        this statement.
                        It seemed to me that you are proud of it.
                        Regarding ignoring, find here a link
                        https://topwar.ru/164361-ssha-poprosili-kruiznuju-kompaniju-pomoch-vosstanovit-avianoscy.html#comment-id-9824415
                        why "Sirozha" is an insult, but "comrade" is not. And if you are really neutral, reread the dialogues, the person is clearly mocking.
                        I am here to convey my opinion, my vision of events. And if I criticize the modern power of Russia, then I deep down hope that they will at least hear me a little, in return, I hear insults to the Soviet government.
                        In the end, (again, I appeal to people from the Kremlin), you want the people to forget about the Union, do better than it was then.
                      14. -2
                        31 December 2019 13: 57
                        Quote: Gardamir
                        why "Sirozha" is an insult, but "comrade" is not.

                        Disingenuous, and obviously, in fact, the word "SiRozha". Do not pretend to be misunderstood, "SiMug"and now find something similar in the word" comrade "
                      15. +5
                        31 December 2019 14: 08
                        "Si
                        bueno, que asi seaIt's like we once said, why are our scouts so, and enemy spies? The letter "and" is either familiarity or disdain. I agree that it is so bad. But after all, everyone puts his own meaning into words, therefore, distorting the word comrade is the same as changing a name.
                        In addition, I am not for the Communists, but in my Soviet childhood and youth I do not allow anyone to spit.
            2. +4
              31 December 2019 09: 47
              Quote: Mytholog
              If anything, several former white officers and generals - Worked later for the good of the country, and even at the military academy named after Frunze was taught.

              Surnames in the studio! Officers of the tsarist army - perhaps ...
              1. +3
                31 December 2019 10: 03
                For example, the gene. Slashchev, an active participant in the White movement in southern Russia. Later he taught at the courses of the Red Army command staff.
              2. 0
                31 December 2019 15: 04
                Offhand - Slaschev, Sukin, Govorov, Alftaer
            3. -1
              1 January 2020 11: 59
              Well compared.
              Bandits and representatives of the White movement.
              Learn the story yourself.
        2. +9
          31 December 2019 07: 21
          one can and should be guided as an example to all current and future leaders of the country.
          Cho are not guided? Is the campas broken? By stars, by stars (only not those that are Kirkorov / Basque and others like them, but it seems that it’s just what happens).
        3. +15
          31 December 2019 08: 10
          The management people are too small to equal Stalin. In his time, wolves would have eaten them in ravines.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +13
        31 December 2019 09: 23
        Quote: Svarog
        Do you think I.V. Stalin from Kadyrov would accept congratulations?

        He would not accept Putin either.

        Traitors (those who were a communist, but darted into the camp of the enemy) were then put to the wall. And the quality of leadership was then higher. They were ideological. And now one loot is a priority. Salvage, like selfish interest.
        Do not confuse joy with the state, economy and people. It’s customary only to talk about it, to promise beautifully. Things are done only for the sake of the inner circle.

        Simple question. For whom is everything done in Russia? (Who should live well in Russia?) The people here are the last in priority.
        1. +1
          31 December 2019 11: 19
          Quote: Stas157
          Traitors (those who were a communist, but darted into the camp of the enemy) were then put to the wall.

          Who would doubt that,
          1. +7
            31 December 2019 11: 30
            Quote: Tersky
            Who would doubt that,

            If you use your analogy, then Putin will face exactly the same fate as his predecessors - Yeltsin and Gorbachev. The people rightfully call former leaders by their proper names.

            Stalin was slandered by the then uninhabited elite, led by Khrushchev. The people of Stalin himself never called a traitor. After the death of the leader, they cried. Now - flowers are being carried to the grave.
            1. -2
              31 December 2019 11: 41
              Quote: Stas157
              If you use your analogy,

              These are historical facts, not my analogy.
              Quote: Stas157
              Putin will face exactly the same fate as his predecessors - Yeltsin and Gorbachev.

              God alone knows who is waiting
              Quote: Stas157
              Stalin was slandered by the then uninhabited elite, led by Khrushchev.

              And what party did this elite belong to, do not tell me?
              Quote: Stas157
              After the death of the leader, they cried.

              At Brezhnev’s funeral, the same thing ... But Andropov and Chernenko weren’t there, they didn’t get used to them.
              1. +4
                31 December 2019 11: 50
                Quote: Tersky
                At Brezhnev’s funeral, the same ...

                But I didn’t see it at all. Who was crying at Brezhnev’s funeral? There was a problem for children - cartoons on TV were not shown in connection with mourning. That’s all sadness.
                Quote: Tersky
                And what party did this elite belong to, do not tell me?

                There are traitors in any party and in any elite. Putin has a throne firmly, no revolution is not terrible. If they throw off only their own, the next. Oh, there certainly will be traitors, it is worth blowing the wind in the other direction.
                1. The comment was deleted.
      4. -7
        31 December 2019 13: 07
        The fact of the matter was that it didn’t stand - under Putin, so many people did not die from: wars, starvation, repression, resettlement, and other delights of Bolshevism, which were during the reign of Stalin.
        1. Alf
          +3
          31 December 2019 20: 33
          Quote: Vadim237
          The fact of the matter was that it didn’t stand - under Putin, so many people did not die from: wars, starvation, repression, resettlement, and other delights of Bolshevism, which were during the reign of Stalin.



          The people themselves died out, at will.
      5. -2
        31 December 2019 14: 43
        Quote: Svarog
        Do you think I.V. Stalin from Kadyrov would accept congratulations?

        Stalin even received congratulations from his political enemies (Churchill and Roosevelt, for example), and Kadyrov was an ally.
      6. +2
        1 January 2020 11: 06
        Somehow in a cafe (about ten years ago, after the second Chechen one), a group of Chechens sat near us
        all over thirty years old, over the age of fifty. I understand that Maskhadov’s colleagues. Clarification occurred in Ukraine.
        Basayev and Putin discussed, and there was almost no negative attitude towards the President of Russia.
        Which of the visitors began to "roll the barrel" at Stalin. Then the elder stood up and asked to be silent.
        Then he answered: no matter how Stalin acts, he still remains a GREAT Man ..
        to hear this from the mouth of a representative of a deported people is worth a lot
    2. +12
      31 December 2019 07: 19
      Iosif Vissarionovich was not. He really ruled there. Have worked. And very successful, to put it mildly.
  3. +18
    31 December 2019 06: 35
    Former terrorist congratulated on victory over terrorism.
    It’s the same as alcohol would win in the fight against alcohol, and the alcoholic would begin to congratulate the bottle. crying
    1. +14
      31 December 2019 06: 37
      Quote: mordvin xnumx
      Former terrorist


      There are no former terrorists.
      1. +5
        31 December 2019 06: 38
        Quote: Kleber
        There are no former terrorists.

        Everything happens with us.
        1. +4
          31 December 2019 06: 46
          "How many wolves do not feed ...."
          1. +1
            31 December 2019 15: 12
            Kleber (Kleber): "How many wolves you feed ...

            But the bear still has more Yes
    2. +14
      31 December 2019 06: 42
      We have built up the absurdity in virtue .. and promote the absurdity ..
      1. +6
        31 December 2019 08: 48
        Quote: Svarog
        We have built up the absurdity in virtue .. and promote the absurdity ..


        Promoting just virtue ...
        1. +1
          31 December 2019 08: 49
          Quote: Banshee
          Quote: Svarog
          We have built up the absurdity in virtue .. and promote the absurdity ..


          Promoting just virtue ...

          Yes, Roman, it’s even more accurate .. hi
          1. +4
            31 December 2019 12: 23
            You are both right now. Now any nonsense is elevated to the rank of truth.
            Either there will be more ... As the saying goes, "make him ... - so he himself ..." (the top on the career ladder of a modern propagandist).
            Let's see off the Old Year already! And let everything bad in him remain!
    3. +5
      31 December 2019 07: 38
      Brilliant, Vladimir! good Not in the eyebrow, but in both eyes and with a boot in the ass !!! Upper class! laughing drinks
    4. AUL
      +7
      31 December 2019 09: 25
      Why, without fear of sin,
      Does the cuckoo praise the rooster?
      - for praising the cuckoo!
      I.A. Krylov.
    5. +7
      31 December 2019 12: 17
      Yeah, and congratulated in the telegram forbidden in the Russian Federation, as symbolic !!! but about the 25-year assault on Grozny and their heroes who laid their heads there in the fight against bearded comrades as in the photo from the headline, that no one remembers! those soldiers do not ride hi
    6. -1
      31 December 2019 14: 49
      Quote: mordvin xnumx
      Former terrorist congratulated on victory over terrorism.
      It’s the same as alcohol would win in the fight against alcohol, and the alcoholic would begin to congratulate the bottle. crying

      Do not foolishly. History knows many examples when former enemies became associates. You remind about the USSR and the GDR, or for your young age you have not heard about this? By the way, the GDR of all the Warsaw Pact countries was the most reliable ally. You can add Cuba, but it was not included in the treaty. And all the rest of Bulgaria-Czechoslovakia-Hungary were allies before they looked at the amount paid to them.
  4. +7
    31 December 2019 06: 46
    Now the young live with one president, as if we were in childhood with one Brezhnev. And such a shock was when he died ...
    1. +7
      31 December 2019 07: 00
      He died, and this die
      1. +9
        31 December 2019 07: 12
        Quote: Deck
        He died, and this die


        The very fact of birth already guarantees death. So this is not even a rhetorical question.
      2. +7
        31 December 2019 07: 42
        Better sooner than later. sad
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +2
            1 January 2020 18: 51
            I also love classics, but so far one rap. request Let's wait ...
    2. +12
      31 December 2019 07: 04
      Quote: sagitch
      And such a shock was when he died ...

      Since I was young and snotty, I didn't have any shock. But my dad said quite sincerely: "He was a good man ..."
      1. 0
        31 December 2019 07: 13
        Many people say that about Brezhnev, especially if the conversation is about vodka. laughing
        1. 0
          31 December 2019 07: 47
          ... but how-pass Ilyich, we have ten on the shoulder ...
          1. +5
            31 December 2019 09: 53
            Quote: GenNick
            ... but how-pass Ilyich, we have ten on the shoulder ...

            "Gorbach", dear, "Gorbach" !!!
            Vodka began to cost eight -
            Anyway, we won’t stop drinking!
            Pass on Hunchback -
            We are ten on the shoulder!
            If it costs more -
            We will arrange what is in Poland,
            It will cost twenty five -
            We will take Winter again!

            And with LIB, vodka cost 2, 87 and after 3, 62 ...
            1. -2
              1 January 2020 13: 46
              Quote: ROSS 42
              "Gorbach", dear, "Gorbach" !!! ...
              And with LIB, vodka cost 2, 87 and after 3, 62 ...

              You're not right. The price of vodka from 2.87 to 3.62 and 4.12 ("Stolichnaya") rose just under Brezhnev in the early 70s. Even in the movie "Ivan Vasilievich Changes His Profession" in 1973, Georges Miloslavsky calls the phone number: "Additional three sixty-two." And this verse was just dedicated to Ilyich, and not to "Gorbach" about which no one had heard then and he sounded like that.
              If there is five vodka, we will all take it.
              If the vodka becomes eight, still we will not stop drinking.
              Pass it on to Ilyich - ten are on our shoulder!
              If prices become higher, then we will do as in Poland.
              If it is twenty-five, we will take the Winter again!

              There was then such a rhyme - "Comrade, believe me, she will come - the same price for vodka ...".
              1. -2
                1 January 2020 14: 04
                One of the proven ways to stay for centuries is to put into circulation cheap vodka. Let its price be not much lower than that of the previous one, but it is guaranteed the title of "national product". The famous vodka was "Andropovka". There was one more decoding of the product name among the people: “Вfrom Он Дedge Кakoy АNdropov ".
            2. -2
              2 January 2020 16: 20
              Quote: ROSS 42
              And with LIB, vodka cost 2, 87 and after 3, 62 ...

              Object essentially, but not stupid minus.
        2. +2
          31 December 2019 10: 30
          Quote: Kleber
          Many people say that about Brezhnev, especially if the conversation is about vodka. laughing

          Thanks to Lena for the taxi, for vodka and for Iwashi))
  5. -1
    31 December 2019 07: 03
    Putin with his twentieth birthday as head of state

    It seems to be not twenty, a little less .... belay
    1. +12
      31 December 2019 07: 07
      Quote: Qwertyarion
      It seems to be not twenty, a little less ....

      Twenty years ago, the drunkard of All Russia Boris said: "I'm tired ... I'm leaving ..." My glass almost fell out of my hand that day. laughing
      1. +3
        31 December 2019 07: 12
        Yeah... drinks he was shocked hi
      2. +7
        31 December 2019 07: 13
        Quote: mordvin xnumx
        Quote: Qwertyarion
        It seems to be not twenty, a little less ....

        Twenty years ago, the drunkard of All Russia Boris said: "I'm tired ... I'm leaving ..." My glass almost fell out of my hand that day. laughing

        Hoping to see a repeat this year? laughing
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. AUL
              +6
              31 December 2019 09: 30
              Quote: Svarog
              Yes, I’m also sure that he won’t leave ..

              They used to talk about members of the Central Committee (with sarcasm) - The Communists are dying at the post! Here, it seems, is the same case!
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    31 December 2019 07: 20
    The most interesting thing is that Putin has not aged a bit over all these decades. In my opinion, he is immortal and will rule forever.
    1. +2
      31 December 2019 07: 30
      Dont be upset.


  8. +10
    31 December 2019 07: 21
    From the article we can conclude that one congratulated Kadyrov, the rest of the governors did not congratulate. Well, then why allocate Kadyrov?
    By the way, they say Putin does not use the Internet, that he will never know about this congratulations?
    And why hasn't Putin cleared these "Lenin bombs" for 20 years and transferred the republics to the rank of provinces? So now these are his bombs.
    1. +4
      31 December 2019 07: 49
      Quote: Gardamir
      did not transfer the republic to the rank of provinces? So now it's his bombs.


      Republic and the USSR were. It's not about the name. There was already a fuss with Tatarstan when it became clear that the republican constitution was more important than the federal constitution on its territory. And in how many other republics also? And the word Federation itself does not play a simple role.
  9. +5
    31 December 2019 08: 11
    Vladimir Vladimirovich, take away an iPhone with an iPad from the Vedmedev, and put it in the corner all night negative ! Or send him to resign! !!
  10. +1
    31 December 2019 08: 29
    Twenty years on the post. Vladimir Putin congratulated Ramzan Kadyrov

    This does not cause any joy ... but Morgan was also a successful governor, and even sir, it seems.
    The word expediency is very rarely sweet to many.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. -5
    31 December 2019 13: 29
    Oh, complete Order: the roll-call is carried out, all the possessors are in place and verb, heartfelt, how much in vain. laughing laughing laughing
  13. -1
    31 December 2019 14: 40
    Kadyrenysh is a disgrace to Russia.
  14. +1
    31 December 2019 15: 33
    Tsarek congratulated the king!
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +2
    31 December 2019 19: 35
    Held the helmsman. We need a fresh look at the problems, and they have * a national treasure * and for the cordon, and loot in their pockets. * Rulers ... *