Zhirinovsky proposed amending the Constitution regarding the post of president

174

The leader of the LDPR faction in the State Duma, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, proposed amending the Russian Constitution in order to “offload” the country's president from the excessive burden of duties. He stated this in his Telegram channel.

Now the Constitution states that the President of the Russian Federation does not have the right to fulfill his duties for more than two consecutive terms. But if there was a break between them, then he can run for the third and fourth time. Vladimir Volfovich suggested removing the word “in a row” from this wording.



In fact, Zhirinovsky in this situation will repeat the same thing that Putin himself said during a press conference. Initially, such an initiative belonged to the current president of the country. At the same time, he noted that such a decision does not need to be rushed, since it needs to be carefully considered.

In addition, Zhirinovsky believes that the president has too many responsibilities. Therefore, in order to “unload” him, he proposes to introduce the post of vice president, on whose shoulders to shift part of the presidential duties. He believes that the power functions performed by the country's leader today should be distributed between him, his deputy and the head of government. IN stories The country already had a period when the position of vice president existed in the power structure.

Earlier, Vladimir Zhirinovsky put forward an initiative to reduce the presidential term in Russia to five years.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    174 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +11
      December 29 2019
      They are testing the soil
      1. +19
        December 29 2019
        He believes that the power functions performed by the country's leader today should be distributed between him, his deputy and the head of government.

        Well, there was a place for Lukashenko.
        1. +23
          December 29 2019
          Zhirinovsky would not get involved in these matters - i.e. in appointing yourself vice president! Old Zhirik is already for the vice-president of Russia. And his son in the United States should sunbathe on "business trips" less.

          And I don't even want to talk about expanding the powers of the same Medvedev in the form of assigning him some of the functions of the President of the Russian Federation! As you look at his "market" financial and economic monetarist bloc in the government of the Russian Federation with the IMF policy - and it becomes sickening!
          1. +19
            December 29 2019
            In addition, Zhirinovsky believes that the president has too many responsibilities. Therefore, in order to “unload” him, he proposes to introduce the post of vice president, on whose shoulders shift part of the presidential duties. He believes that the power functions performed by the country's leader today should be distributed between him, his deputy and the head of government.

            All this is in fact and is called DUAL AUTHORITY in the country. And for a specific person! For whom exactly? That is the question! And why and to whom does it still need?

            In 1917, this dual power already led to the collapse of the Republic of Ingushetia and to a civil war! Only the Bolsheviks then barely managed the country - with territorial losses (!) - to put together!
            1. +3
              December 29 2019
              On the question of changing the Constitution of the Russian Federation, one thing should be noted. Namely.

              In Soviet times, the study of political history was mainly reduced to the study of the politics of SEPARATE national states and at the state-national level between them. On the existence in the world in the globalist sense of the so-called. There were usually no "supranational structures", except for the creation and liquidation of the proletarian Cominterns. - and nothing more.
              At the same time, at home - i.e. on an unofficial level, there were rumors about the alleged existence in the world of the so-called. "world government".

              In other words, in the very system of political education of students of the USSR in Soviet public education, the study of systems of other globalist supranational structures, except for the Cominterns, was categorically excluded - rejected. And that was wrong.
              Therefore, the uninitiated population of the USSR and the majority of the CPSU members surrendered their country and socialist system to the West and Western globalists almost without a fight.

              In this regard, when the United States - agents of the CIA - wrote their pro-American Constitution of the Russian Federation for Russia and adopted it in our country, the question arises. Whose interests in the West are globally reflected in the Constitution of the Russian Federation? And who exactly in the power of the Russian Federation represents their interests administratively colonial?

              In the struggle between themselves in the form of supranational globalist structures, the Rothschild clan (purely financial clan) and the Rockefeller clan (production and financial clan) were noticed.

              Moreover, while in Ukraine it is clear that the purely Rothschild clan reigns in Ukraine, then in the Russian Federation there is a question - which person in power is exactly what kind of American clan represents? And why the question arises of a split power of the president of the Russian Federation?

              Rothschild counterattack. Andrey Fursov. • Feb 13 2019 year
              1. -3
                December 30 2019
                Put on the foil hat.
            2. +3
              December 29 2019
              Quote: Tatiana
              ....... All this is in fact and is called DUAL AUTHORITY in the country. And for a specific person! For whom exactly? That is the question! And why and to whom does it still need?
              In 1917, this dual power already led to the collapse of the Republic of Ingushetia and to a civil war! Only the Bolsheviks then barely managed the country - with territorial losses (!) - to put together!

              You already wrote something like this before, Tatyana love Your forecasts of that and look come true. Your assessment of the situation is ---- true in this way. good
          2. +1
            December 29 2019
            Tatyana, and who told you that Zhirinovsky will be vice president? If you introduce this post, then there will be a lot of people wishing
        2. +14
          December 29 2019
          Quote: figvam
          Well, there was a place for Lukashenko.

          Rather, with Lukashenko, the solution to the problem of 2024 (unification - a new country - the presidential term counter is reset to zero) did not come out, the old man did not want to. Therefore, they want to make the presidential post nominal and transfer Putin to the prime ministers with full authority, but without any restrictions on the time of stay.
          1. +4
            December 29 2019
            Does Luka need this? He understands that for the successful leadership of Russia, it is necessary first of all to create a semblance of the Gulag to restore at least some kind of justice in society, and there are already a lot of its candidates to populate.
            1. +1
              December 29 2019
              Old Man will cope with this without straining.
          2. +4
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Vyacheslav Viktorovich
            Rather, with Lukashenko the solution to the problem of 2024

            Well, what kind of 2024, when a few days ago Zyuganov put forward a proposal for an early presidential election, and they prompted him from above.
          3. +3
            December 29 2019
            Vyacheslav Viktorovich, I doubt very much that this will happen: in Minsk and Moscow, elites have already formed that are NOT INTERESTED in the association
            1. +1
              December 30 2019
              Elites in Minsk may have no choice! Everything seems to be sad there, and the local elites will be blown away. The people cannot over tighten the nuts!
              1. +1
                December 30 2019
                Are you saying there will be an explosion? I doubt: we did not have an "explosion", but what makes Belarus different from us.
            2. 0
              December 30 2019
              So I wrote about this exactly - the option with unification did not come out. Therefore, they are looking for other ways to leave Putin in power, in this case, through a change in the constitution. It may not be as solemn as through unification, but it’s okay, and so it will work. But Lukashenko will remain as he was, and Belarus will remain as he was.
              1. 0
                December 30 2019
                We will wait and see.
        3. 0
          December 29 2019
          Apparently you are thinking in the right direction. Time will tell, because we do not have comprehensive information.
      2. +4
        December 29 2019
        Everyone has long understood that the liberal-bourgeois system of government, which is effective in the West in Russia, does not really work - either an absolute monarch or an absolute general secretary is needed! And all these elections are good for Luxembourg or for the United States! The Empire must have an Emperor! Bad, good - this is for historians in the future, but the Empire must have an Emperor!
        1. +27
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Finches
          Everyone has long understood that a liberal-bourgeois system of government that is effective in the West in Russia does not really work

          All are adequate citizens .. in the government, I'm afraid they did not understand this .. and they will not understand, there is no goal to make a prosperous state with a social orientation, the goal is to create an "elite" that could enrich itself and control slaves ..
          The Empire must have an Emperor! Bad, good - this is for historians in the future, but the Empire must have an Emperor!

          But before the empire should have a sense of existence, in today's paradigm, the empire cannot take place ..
        2. -2
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Finches
          Everyone has long understood that the liberal-bourgeois system of government, which is effective in the West in Russia, does not really work - either an absolute monarch or an absolute general secretary is needed! And all these elections are good for Luxembourg or for the United States! The Empire must have an Emperor! Bad, good - this is for historians in the future, but the Empire must have an Emperor!

          You throw these imperial little things, in the courtyard of the 21st century, and even more so, modern Russia does not pull the empire. Although it’s hard for you to get rid of leaderism that has been instilled in us for a hundred years, but it is necessary.
          1. +14
            December 29 2019
            Why a hundred? We have been living under liberal bourgeois democracy for only 28 years - do you like it? Not for me! I was better with the leaders! You know more comfortable ...
            1. -11
              December 29 2019
              Quote: Finches
              Why a hundred

              Right after 1917
            2. -13
              December 29 2019
              Quote: Finches
              I was better with the leaders! You know more comfortable ...

              You live in the past, it’s normal at your age
              1. +8
                December 29 2019
                Are you a young pink-cheeked male - the whole world through the prism of a gadget? laughing
                1. 0
                  December 29 2019
                  Quote: Finches
                  And you are a young, pink-cheeked male -

                  I already have children far from rosy cheeks.
                  Quote: Finches
                  the whole world through the prism of a gadget?

                  Thanks to "bourgeois" gadgets and the Internet, we have the opportunity to communicate here.
                  1. +18
                    December 29 2019
                    I tell the students about this, starting that Popov invented radio here, and in the West Marconi, we have a theorem for converting an analog signal into a digital one is called the Kotelnikov theorem, but in the West they write it like Nyquist-Shannon ... Kotelnikov came to digital at the beginning 30s, by the way. And we invented the mobile phone 10 years earlier than the Americans ... So you are there too - "bourgeois", "bourgeois" .... - patented and massively launched for sale! No more! But we got a concrete lag with the collapse of the USSR and now we will never do our own in a single economic space of capitalism for one simple reason - it is not economically profitable! It's easier to buy a patent than to invest in science! But Stalin understood this, that is why enormous funds were invested in science ... That is why a statesman-master is needed - because the historical role of Russia is to be an Empire! Red, green ... - not so important! In the meantime, we are an ordinary market for cheap labor and rich hydrocarbon deposits, etc. All our ambitions are a glorious past, and in the modern world we are nobody and can not be called! And this will continue until the people understand the obvious thing - Russia is considered only when it is an Empire!
                    1. -5
                      December 29 2019
                      Quote: Finches
                      All our ambitions are a glorious past, and in the modern world we are nobody and there is no way to call us!

                      Exceptionally so!
                    2. +2
                      December 29 2019
                      I agree with you: in Russia without the Emperor, and what is his name is not important
                    3. +1
                      December 30 2019
                      you need a king and not a "state owner" to do everything for you.
                      1. +2
                        December 30 2019
                        Many kings did something for the people - they already worked hard, poor fellow! laughing

                        The Emperor, Tsar, General Secretary is the sacred core of Russian statehood !!!
            3. -12
              December 29 2019
              The leader needs a herd. Unfortunately, we do not have bourgeois democracy. Our wild capitalism has nothing to do with bourgeois democracy. Although he is better than the era of leaders.
              1. +10
                December 29 2019
                Quote: AS Ivanov.
                The leader needs a herd.

                don't be afraid that it will turn out so ...
                1. +2
                  December 29 2019
                  And so it happened in 1991.
        3. +18
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Finches
          Bad, good - this is for historians in the future, but the Empire must have an Emperor!

          Nicholas II is a bad emperor, with him the collapse of the Russian Empire. He paid for it with his life and the life of his family. And how many died in the Grazhdun war?
          We always hope for the best, but often our desires do not coincide with the realities that have arisen. Therefore, we will quickly feel "good or bad" on our own skin.
          That's just nothing can be changed
          1. -2
            December 29 2019
            So what is the difference - if there is no difference? laughing
            1. +6
              December 29 2019
              Quote: Finches
              So what is the difference - if there is no difference?

              the difference is exactly in your proposal ...
              Quote: Finches
              The Empire must have an Emperor!

              you offer no alternative hi
              I want to. so that everything is the choice and the real one. And then we will survive, children and grandchildren live, from the death of one leader to the death of his successor, while the country is shaking and it is losing something
      3. +22
        December 29 2019
        No need to write about Zhirinovsky in VO. This is a little bit embarrassing. Then what, Buzova’s tweets will begin to discuss.
        1. +14
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Siberia 75
          No need to write about Zhirinovsky in VO.

          I agree, the populist is cheap. He says everything is correct, but in the Duma he votes in a completely different way.
        2. +18
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Siberia 75
          No need to write about Zhirinovsky in VO.

          It's not about Zhirinovsky. but in what he says. In a way, he is the mouthpiece through which the plans and ideas of some gentlemen are proclaimed.
        3. +2
          December 29 2019
          What is this "not necessary"? Zhirik has been using a weather vane for 20 years already. Any of his statements on important topics begins in the Presidential Administration. Then the ZYU will say that it's time to change the Constitution, then they will announce to us that a consensus has been reached in society, then the State Duma will quickly approve it. Nobody will ask the people, the people in our country are not subject to resolve such issues.
          1. +2
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Robertocalos
            no one will ask the people, the people in our country are not subjective to resolve such issues.

            The people are not "subject" anywhere, as you put it, for sir, is subject to influence and in the mass is insane.
            I would not want people whom I know - neighbors, colleagues, acquaintances, to have an influence on decision-making at the "State" level
            PS Even the overwhelming majority of VO visitors should in no case be allowed to resolve issues above the "yard-micro district" location (including me) Yes
            1. 0
              December 29 2019
              There is a grain of sanity. But decisions need to be made and done with responsibility. Then 4 levels of deputies should be - district - city - region - federation. Each consists of members of previous levels. And the electoral college of the president of the most respected people is proportional to the population of the subjects.
            2. +2
              December 29 2019
              Quote: Siberia 75
              The people are not "subject" anywhere, as you put it, for sir, is subject to influence and in the mass is insane.
              I would not want people whom I know - neighbors, colleagues, acquaintances, to have an influence on decision-making at the "State" level

              You do not find that "dullness", "not cleverness" and exposure to influence, this is the merit of this particular state.
              1. 0
                December 29 2019
                Quote: WIKI
                that "dullness", "not cleverness" and susceptibility to influence is the merit of this particular state.

                Do you think that in other countries it is different? In Ukraine, the USA, the Baltic states, etc.
                1. +2
                  December 29 2019
                  If we consider "dullness" in the category of people's understanding of political and social processes within the country, then the merit of our state propaganda in this is undoubted. Coverage of only certain topics, with certain experts leads to the appearance of "one-sided" and "gray" people who receive information in this form. In the United States, there is no such one-sided approach to informing citizens about the domestic life of the country.
      4. The comment was deleted.
        1. +7
          December 29 2019
          No, I'm the son of a lawyer
          1. The comment was deleted.
      5. -1
        December 29 2019
        Nothing "personal" -proposes to "unload" the President, as now the President of Russia bears "a huge burden of responsibilities."
        Personally, I have a negative opinion of Yeltsin and Rutskoi. There is no need to talk about the countries of Africa and Latin America - the coups were often followed by the second who wanted to be the first.
        Yes, and in the United States. Replacing Roosevelt and Kennedy, dramatically changed their policies.
        1. 0
          December 29 2019
          the term is needed ONE, and concrete.
          1. +1
            December 29 2019
            But the impeachment tool needs to be simplified. And not any immunity after the reign. Nakosyachil at the helm - answer.
            1. +1
              December 30 2019
              Hunchback answered! If something, fuck you pull it from abroad! Our elites made alternate airfields abroad.
        2. 0
          December 30 2019
          In principle, it is true: every "vice" wants to drop the prefix and become president. Law of nature
    2. +21
      December 29 2019
      Zhirinovsky proposed amendments to the Constitution regarding the post of president
      laughing Well done. I worked out my loot. negative
      The artist played his role to the end. He pulled himself to himself at the right time for Yeltsin’s elections.
      1. +13
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Observer2014
        The artist played his part to the end.

        As long as our electoral system is in a state that allows such artists, and not artists, to be in power indefinitely, the constitution cannot be touched. Because, as they will always change it only in their own interests.
        1. +3
          December 29 2019
          Quote: WIKI
          Quote: Observer2014
          The artist played his part to the end.

          As long as our electoral system is in a state that allows such artists, and not artists, to be in power indefinitely, the constitution cannot be touched. Because, as they will always change it only in their own interests.

          Well said.
          1. +5
            December 29 2019
            They are preparing .... Vaughn, and the "family" began to stir - the "main negotiator" Mr. Voloshin got out of the shadows ....
        2. -1
          December 29 2019
          Not the electoral system, but civil society. As long as there is no civil society in the country, there will always be artists in power.
          1. +7
            December 29 2019
            The creation of civil society involves a longer process. And bringing the electoral system to an adequate state will take a much shorter period of time, and will have a great impact on the formation of civil society. First, introduce a criminal penalty for falsifying election results. Bring to a logical conclusion the use of video of the electoral process, providing the opportunity to present it in the courts. It is so easy to do if there is political will.
            1. +2
              December 29 2019
              Who will introduce the penalty for falsification? Good uncle is a fairy-tale character. As long as power, at least locally, is not controlled by society, any law will not be in favor of society.
              1. +4
                December 29 2019
                Quote: AS Ivanov.
                Who will introduce the penalty for falsification?

                Courts An example of Golunov showed that power can bend under the influence of protests. It is also possible to influence the courts, which are currently manual. In order to control the government, it is necessary to tidy up the electoral system so that there is the possibility of the emergence of an effective opposition, rather than a pocket one. People do not go to the polls not because they are satisfied with the power, but because they do not believe in the fairness of the elections.
                1. +1
                  December 30 2019
                  I have been talking about this for a long time: we NEED A ADEQUATE OPPOSITION LEADER
              2. +5
                December 29 2019
                Quote: AS Ivanov.
                Who will introduce the penalty for falsification?

                actually there is an article for this, that's just what the police are excited for, and if it doesn't, then ....
                Quote: AS Ivanov.
                While power, at least locally, is not controlled by society

                the fact of the matter is that this is a nightmare for power
        3. +1
          December 29 2019
          Our election system is excellent. Only it does not work. Like the main state institutions.
          1. +1
            December 29 2019
            Everything is working. Bourgeois elections and institutions perfectly defend the interests of the oligarchs. For this they exist.
        4. -1
          December 29 2019
          Quote: WIKI
          the constitution cannot be touched.

          those. written under the dictation of the State Department, correct.
          1. +1
            December 29 2019
            I believe that while in a one-party system, the constitution cannot be changed.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. +1
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Pied Piper
          Quote: Observer2014
          The artist played his role to the end. He pulled himself to himself at the right time for Yeltsin’s election


          Here I agree with you completely! hi It is convenient for any government in Russia ..

          Forgive me if that. hi Hamlo is still there. With the coming.
          1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +7
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Observer2014
        Well done. I worked out my loot.

        not only loot, but also caressed by any power


        I bow my head obediently
        before you, you are our Creator!
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. -1
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Observer2014
            Meehan. It doesn't look like you at all.

            well ..because it's not a "mikhan" ...
    3. -5
      December 29 2019
      It’s strange. And if the head of state successfully fulfills his duties, why change him? A new one will come, he needs time in order to learn how to work successfully successfully. In my opinion, this is a simple copy of Western jokes.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. +3
          December 29 2019
          And here is Putin? It can be Petrov, Ivanov, Sidorov. Question of a principled approach. Do not forget that the power of the Republic of Ingushetia and the USSR was under authoritative rulers.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +9
            December 29 2019
            Quote: AlexGa
            And here is Putin?

            Putin, he is not himself on the set. Around him, and with his support, an "elite" was formed, elevated to the rank of not touched and not controlled by society. Given these facts, she will always try to "clone" the previous leader.
          3. +7
            December 29 2019
            Quote: AlexGa
            And here is Putin? It can be Petrov, Ivanov, Sidorov.

            under the existing electoral system and the "independence" of the CEC - do not flatter yourself
        2. -6
          December 29 2019
          Yeah. Strange. You need to clone Putin!


          No one needs to be cloned, but to cancel the time limit is NECESSARY. The president is a temporary worker (maximum 2 terms) - this will turn into a disaster, it makes any person dependent on the oligarchs under such conditions, and that is why we were advised and inspired in the Constitution by suggesting to people that otherwise the president will usurp power.

          In Germany, Merkel has 4 terms in power, Roosevelt has been in power in the USA for 4 terms, and these are real leaders of the country who can rely on popular support to pursue their political course like Putin, and in Ukraine every time the new president helps him a lot? !

          And if the president leaves after 2 terms and at the same time greatly annoys the oligarch, then this will turn into a bunch of accusations of corruption for him, etc. after he leaves office, and the new president will be obedient to the oligarchs like a faithful dog.

          Russia does not need such a path. Limitations of 2 terms must be lifted and the faster the better !!!
          1. +7
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
            Yeah. Strange. You need to clone Putin!


            No one needs to be cloned, but to cancel the time limit is NECESSARY. The president is a temporary worker (maximum 2 terms) - this will turn into a disaster, it makes any person dependent on the oligarchs under such conditions, and that is why we were advised and inspired in the Constitution by suggesting to people that otherwise the president will usurp power.

            In Germany, Merkel has 4 terms in power, Roosevelt has been in power in the USA for 4 terms, and these are real leaders of the country who can rely on popular support to pursue their political course like Putin, and in Ukraine every time the new president helps him a lot? !

            And if the president leaves after 2 terms and at the same time greatly annoys the oligarch, then this will turn into a bunch of accusations of corruption for him, etc. after he leaves office, and the new president will be obedient to the oligarchs like a faithful dog.

            Russia does not need such a path. Limitations of 2 terms must be lifted and the faster the better !!!

            laughing fool Yeah. We’ll introduce a caste system for Russia. laughing World experience zhezh.Vremyashchiki-Ha ha ha! laughing In frames. What are we building? What kind of society? Do we have our own path of development or global? bully
            1. +2
              December 29 2019
              And here is a question for the Constitution, where there is a ban on ideology. Therefore, no one knows what to build.
            2. 0
              December 29 2019
              laughing fool Yeah. We’ll introduce a caste system for Russia. Why should there be little things laughing World experience zhezh. Temporary workers-Ha ha ha! laughing In shots. What are we building? What kind of society? Do we have our own path of development or global? bully


              No need to drag that which is not.

              We are building democracy in Russia, and democracy is the power of the people !!!

              And if so, then the people themselves must decide in the elections to leave the old president or stay !!!

              You do not confuse the abolition of time limits with the abolition of ELECTIONS in the country.
              1. +6
                December 29 2019
                Did they want open, fair elections? Whoever I communicate with around the country, everyone scolds Putin, but 3/4 "voted". Where are they in reality? And so at all levels of elections - whoever has the power, he "wins".
                1. +2
                  December 29 2019
                  Presidential - no, never. Deputies, governors and mayors - were chosen relatively honestly and very competitively. There were 2-3 strong candidates. Until 2004 He himself worked in headquarters, until the last result they did not know. Now - a complete imitation with pre-approved lists from and to. Sometimes it crashes, but this is rare.
                  1. +3
                    December 29 2019
                    Quote: Robertocalos
                    Deputies, governors and mayors - were chosen relatively honestly and very competitively. There were 2-3 strong candidates. Until 2004

                    in those years he was an observer in the elections of the governor of the Nenets Autonomous District. We were brought by plane from Moscow, fed and watered as if for slaughter, but they asked one thing: "Don't let the elections be falsified, everything must be fair." From 7-00 to 2 am we were constantly at the PS, we controlled the whole process. I still don't know who brought us a whole plane of observers from Moscow?
                    1. 0
                      December 29 2019
                      One of the candidates is obvious)
                      1. +3
                        December 29 2019
                        Quote: Robertocalos
                        One of the candidates is obvious)

                        this is obvious, but I don’t know the name and its result in the elections
          2. -1
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
            Russia does not need such a path. Limitations of 2 terms must be lifted and the faster the better !!!

            And make a lifetime post?)))
          3. +1
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
            Merkel has 4 terms in power in Germany; Roosevelt has been in power in the USA 4 terms


            After Roosevelt, the American Constitution was amended to limit the number of presidential terms per person. In Germany, parliamentary democracy.
        3. +16
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Observer2014
          What are we building? What kind of society?

          The problem is that they are not building anything, but they have put a device on society .. If they were building, they could already see the result ..
          1. -8
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Svarog
            If they were building, then they could already see the result ..

            I lived in the dashing 90s and can compare. There are results.
            1. +2
              December 29 2019
              Quote: Piramidon
              There are results.

              And you do not think that this result could be not so, but much better. Maybe 19 years is the age of a young man, all the leaps and breakthroughs ahead. )))
              1. -2
                December 29 2019
                Quote: shura7782
                And you do not think that this result could be not so, but much better

                Could, with a different state structure. But is there any result? Something is being done in a positive sense. Perestroika and the Boriskino reign in general killed everything without any hope for the best ..
                1. 0
                  December 29 2019
                  Quote: Piramidon
                  and Boriskino’s reign killed everything without hope
                  We can agree with this. because it is known by comparison.
                  Something ...
                  Stepan, the main complaint about the GDP, from my point of view, is that this "WHAT'S THAT" is not enough anymore. In beloved China (this is about GDP), any student knows that we have an extremely inefficient economy. So your fair phrase
                  in general, everything killed without any hope for the best ..
                  Now relevant too.
                  Question. How to make the top work so effectively that the feelings of the local URA patriots do not offend?
      2. +1
        December 29 2019
        It’s strange. And if the head of state successfully fulfills his duties, why change him? A new one will come, he needs time in order to learn how to work successfully successfully. In my opinion, this is a simple copy of Western jokes.


        I agree with you on 100%.

        Nobody cancels the election. The people should decide once every 6 years to extend the powers of the president or not, and not automatically refuse good for the sake of someone deciding that the presidents should be changed regularly.

        No one at any enterprise or production dismisses a good leader, engineer or skilled worker just because he has worked in this position for 10 years. Such people are valued, because it is very difficult to find replacements for them.

        And the main person in the country - the president, we want to dismiss in fact only because he has already worked and let another try. The West imposed this norm on us as a time limit and we are still defending it.
        1. 0
          December 29 2019
          I absolutely agree with you!
        2. +1
          December 29 2019
          I’ll add, it’s like in the army when they proclaimed that the officer should grow. And he is capable of more, no one understood. Such things have been done!
    4. +10
      December 29 2019
      who cares? under capitalism, whoever you choose is a stooge of the oligarchy and only very naive people think that the system can be changed through elections, look at historical examples, only the revolution, as if we wouldn’t want it without a fight, money bags will never give up power
      1. -5
        December 29 2019
        under capitalism, whoever you choose is a protege of the oligarchy


        Putin whose protege? Khodorkovsky or Berezovsky? Where are these oligarchs now?
        1. +7
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
          Where are these oligarchs now?

          Aven, Friedman, Vekselberg, Potanin, Rotenberg.
          1. -4
            December 29 2019
            Aven, Friedman, Vekselberg, Potanin, Rotenberg.


            Are these people oligarchs?

            The oligarch is the one who influences politics in the country, so Khodorkovsky and Berezovsky tried and they are not in the country.

            And those whom you listed are just rich people and they already became rich before Putin. The same Rotenberg has been working with Gazprom subsidiaries since 1992, and Putin did nothing to help him with this, like everyone else.

            But the Rotenbergs rescued Putin with the same Crimean bridge, otherwise it would now stand as North 2 or South Stream unfinished, because the US is threatening sanctions. And so Rotenberg took the project and took a bunch of contractors across the country and did !!! Yes, it’s not kosher without a tender for a direct one, either with the Zenith stadium and the Vostochny cosmodrome, where a lot of money has already been stolen on these long-term construction projects and a lot of people have been planted, but then THE BRIDGE IS READY !!!

            Or what, someone else was eager to build a bridge to the Crimea? Sberbank, headed by the pseudo-liberal and "smart guy" Gref, is even afraid to open a bank branch there.

            Do you need people like Gref in power? Who will lick the boots and boots of the Western masters ?! I don’t, I need someone like Putin.
            1. +4
              December 29 2019
              Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
              I don’t, I need someone like Putin.

              I need people like Grudinin, Platoshkin, Kvachkov, Sirelkov, etc. People who see and understand that a strong economy determines the greatness of a country, not gas and oil pipelines in all directions.
              1. -8
                December 29 2019
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                I need people like Grudinin,

                Businessman and marketer.
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Platoshkin

                Two-faced balabol, on TV for Putin, he is tearing his shirt on himself, but on the Internet he’s hateful.
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Kvachkov,

                Fucker, convict.
                Quote: Ingvar 72
                Sirelkov

                Khokhlov sold, surrendered Slavyansk, now rolled down to the marginal
                1. +6
                  December 29 2019
                  Is Putin our everything? belay For the rest, I would like to have evidence.
                2. +2
                  December 29 2019
                  In general, I agree, only in vain are you talking about Strelkov.

                  He would not have kept Slovyansk, and this is a fact, the forces are not very equal, but if he died there, it would become a demoralizing factor for the entire militia and would have encouraged the punitive forces from the Armed Forces, which would lead to the complete defeat of the militia.

                  As they say, everyone imagines himself a strategist, seeing the battle from the side.

                  Strelkov is a good commander, but he has no political experience, and now he has completely retired.
                  1. 0
                    December 29 2019
                    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
                    Strelkov is a good commander, but he has no political experience, and now he has completely retired.

                    Watch it on YouTube.
              2. -2
                December 29 2019
                I need people like Grudinin, Platoshkin, Kvachkov, Sirelkov, etc. People,


                Grudinin?

                This is the one who deceived the collective farmers with shares during the privatization and appropriated more than 40% of the collective farm from 2000 hectares in Moscow and now receives the lion's share of the income from leasing this land to such shopping centers as Vegas and another 10 similar, but smaller. At the same time, he pretends to be the leader of a successful collective farm, saying that he made a fortune on strawberries and teaches the rest how agriculture should be developed.
                And Gruzinin has so much money that he forgets how much and what accounts he has in foreign banks and brazenly lies to his voters? How can you forget that you have not 1, but 11 accounts in currency and gold and this is only in one bank.

                Platoshkin?

                The populist often speaks beautifully, only he lacks competence and professionalism, and maybe he just lies intentionally.

                Beluga roared that Russia sells electricity to China cheaper than to the public. If he was a competent person, he would understand that firstly they sell to China at a wholesale price and in large volumes, and this is the price at the border, when electricity reaches Chinese consumers, part of it due to physical reasons (due to distance) will be lost, in addition so that electricity reaches the consumer, a lot of substations with a staff of people work on this, and for this reason, the retail price is always higher than the wholesale price.

                Kvachkov?

                Kvachkov and his associates planned to seize weapons in several military units, and then arrange a campaign against Moscow, the aim of which was to seize power.

                Do you want to see how tanks shoot at the parliament in the country again ?!


                Shooters?

                Good colonel. Only now the leader of the country does not pull.
                1. +3
                  December 29 2019
                  Ratmir, are you all bad, but is there anyone good?
          2. +2
            December 29 2019
            Quite the opposite. If not for Putin, then neither Rotenberg, nor Timchenko, nor Vekselberg would ever have become oligarchs. But the destruction of seven-bankers is Putin’s merit.
            1. +6
              December 29 2019
              Quote: AS Ivanov.
              But the destruction of seven-bankers is Putin’s merit.

              to...
              Quote: AS Ivanov.
              Rotenbergs, Timchenko, Vekselberg became oligarchs.
              1. -1
                December 29 2019
                And who else can you rely on? Only to the one who owes you everything that you yourself have done.
                1. +4
                  December 29 2019
                  Quote: AS Ivanov.
                  And who else can you rely on? Only to the one who owes you everything that you yourself have done.

                  a new king will come and this cycle will be repeated.
                  1. 0
                    December 29 2019
                    By itself. That was the case under any authority: the leader surrounded himself with his people.
                    1. +3
                      December 29 2019
                      Quote: AS Ivanov.
                      By itself. That was the case under any authority: the leader surrounded himself with his people.

                      so what then
                      Quote: AU Ivanov.
                      ... Putin’s merit.

                      at...
                      Quote: AS Ivanov.
                      ... the destruction of seven-bankers
                      ?
                      After all, I tried for myself and for friends
    5. +9
      December 29 2019
      Vladimir Volfovich proposed to remove the word “in a row” from this wording
      The practice of Vladimir Volfovich, worked out over the years, is a harsh criticism of everyone and everything on TV, in fact, with two hands for what the president has expressed. And, characteristically, this works great for Zhirinovsky.
    6. +10
      December 29 2019
      If Zhirik proposes, therefore, the reform will be ... He usually type from the opposition voices the desire for power ...
    7. vmo
      +7
      December 29 2019
      at the same time send to retire Zhirinovsky, as a country's burden.
    8. -1
      December 29 2019
      Nonsense and stupidity !!!

      It is necessary to remove the word - "limitation of presidential powers to 2 terms" !!!

      I explain why:

      1. The president, who can be elected for 2 terms, understands that he will quit anyway, that is, he is a temporary worker, and when he is deprived of power and its protection, financial tycoons can punish him simply by provoking a bunch of false accusations and therefore it makes him dependent from oligarchs (as in the USA). There, by the way, precisely after Roosevelt (the people's president), these restrictions were introduced.

      And the dependent president from the oligarchs, especially in Russia, will lead us to a new collapse and a new civil war.

      Based on the support of the people (like Roosevelt), the president can safely pursue his policy, implement projects not for the sake of rating and popularity, but for the sake of a positive effect in 10 or even 20 years, even if this is not immediately obvious.

      2. The choice of the people should not be limited either by the Constitution of the Russian Federation or by anything or by anyone else, no one will usurp the power (Merkel has 4 terms in power, Putin has 4 terms in power for 200 years) the elections remain and the people decide to extend the powers of the country's leader or not - this is a full-fledged democracy.

      Well, no one in their right mind expels a talented leader or just an engineer or a skilled worker from the enterprise only because he has worked on it for 8 years. So why should we take another president on whom not the fate of the plant but the whole country depends, if the old suits us ?!
      1. -4
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        Nonsense and stupidity !!!

        It is necessary to remove the word - "limitation of presidential powers to 2 terms" !!!

        I explain why:

        1. The president, who can be elected for 2 terms, understands that he will quit anyway, that is, he is a temporary worker, and when he is deprived of power and its protection, financial tycoons can punish him simply by provoking a bunch of false accusations and therefore it makes him dependent from oligarchs (as in the USA). There, by the way, precisely after Roosevelt (the people's president), these restrictions were introduced.

        And the dependent president from the oligarchs, especially in Russia, will lead us to a new collapse and a new civil war.

        Based on the support of the people (like Roosevelt), the president can safely pursue his policy, implement projects not for the sake of rating and popularity, but for the sake of a positive effect in 10 or even 20 years, even if this is not immediately obvious.

        2. The choice of the people should not be limited either by the Constitution of the Russian Federation or by anything or by anyone else, no one will usurp the power (Merkel has 4 terms in power, Putin has 4 terms in power for 200 years) the elections remain and the people decide to extend the powers of the country's leader or not - this is a full-fledged democracy.

        Well, no one in their right mind expels a talented leader or just an engineer or a skilled worker from the enterprise only because he has worked on it for 8 years. So why should we take another president on whom not the fate of the plant but the whole country depends, if the old suits us ?!

        I totally agree with you. I do not know a single leader, ruler or monarch who in a short time could achieve significant things for the country. If something was done, then at least it is not fast. Any president needs time to carry out his reforms. And if every 6 years we change the sovereign, we will get porridge in all sectors.
        1. +6
          December 29 2019
          Quote: skif8013
          then we get porridge in all sectors.

          And now what? belay It’s not even porridge, it’s a vanity fair and absurdity! It was under Putin that the head of Roscosmos receives a salary many times higher than the head of NASA. It was under Putin that Serdyukov exchanges one chair for another, and does not sit in prison. He must be dismissed with disgrace, and not be transferred to another department with a raise. It’s better to keep silent about Chubais; for 10 years now he must rot at the landfill for state criminals. And that's all under Putin.
          Further, lovers of singing praises to Putin, they say thousands of factories and factories are open - make up two columns on a piece of paper, write down the number of factories with jobs, in the number of closed ones, also with jobs. For without comparison, all your praises are nothing more than vile manipulation.
        2. +2
          December 29 2019
          Quote: skif8013
          . Any president needs time to carry out his reforms. And if every 6 years we change the sovereign, we will get porridge in all sectors.

          Putin has been in power for 20 years, so what?
          He carried out the reforms — pension, trash, tax, etc. How much reform does he need to still skin the population?
          1. -7
            December 29 2019
            Quote: RUSS
            Quote: skif8013
            . Any president needs time to carry out his reforms. And if every 6 years we change the sovereign, we will get porridge in all sectors.

            Putin has been in power for 20 years, so what?
            He carried out the reforms — pension, trash, tax, etc. How much reform does he need to still skin the population?

            90s remember and compare. The whining and murmuring of the people in all ages will be. But not everyone dares to take a sober look from the side. Again, I do not praise Putin, but he saved our country and at least deserves respect for it! Personally, I am not particularly pleased with life as it is now, but I am afraid to imagine in a nightmare that it would be if Boriska had not left then! And for those who are not satisfied, I can say, compare the army to 2000 and today's, compare what Russia can now. Forgot how Yugoslavia was ironed, and we were silent in a rag? !!! Now this number will not work !!!
        3. +7
          December 29 2019
          Why are you trying to personify power? First of all, there should be a working system, regardless of the name of the leader, and when everything is based on personal agreements, then there is nothing good in this. Fell down the stairs and everything crumbled.
        4. +5
          December 29 2019
          Quote: skif8013
          I do not know a single leader, ruler or monarch who in a short time could achieve significant things for the country. If something was done, then at least it is not fast. Any president needs time to carry out his reforms.

          name at least one US president, prime minister of Japan, South Korea, who would rule for so many years? They are changing in terms of time and countries are developing.
          In China, the President of the PRC cannot be in power for more than 2 terms of 5 years. And what, China in the swamp?
          1. +1
            December 30 2019
            Well, I want the serfs of the king. There is nothing to be done with such ...
          2. +1
            December 30 2019
            In the PRC, if you are not in the know, restrictions on occupation of terms by the Secretary General of the CPC Central Committee and the Chairman of the PRC are lifted at the initiative of Xi. In recent decades, they have had the practice of combining the posts of the Secretary General of the CPC Central Committee and the Chairman of the PRC. But by themselves, the powers of the President of the PRC are very modest. He has real power precisely because he is also the Secretary General of the CPC Central Committee. At the level of provinces, autonomous regions and large cities there is no such combination, there is another scheme most often (not always): city measures, the provincial governor is the deputy secretary of the CPC committee of the city or province.
      2. 0
        December 29 2019
        Ratmir, actually F. Roosevelt was the glorification of big capital, as they told us at school, but the people and the oligarchs are not the same
      3. +1
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        And the dependent president from the oligarchs, especially in Russia, will lead us to a new collapse and a new civil war.


        Who will fight with whom in this civil war?

        Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
        Well, no one in their right mind expels a talented leader or just an engineer or a skilled worker from the enterprise only because he has worked on it for 8 years.


        No one in their right mind would equate a "talented leader" with a president.
      4. +7
        December 29 2019
        Take a look at the big car companies. Even for 10 years, CEOs are rarely delayed. But the concern is almost a state. With hundreds of thousands of employees around the world. A good person is not a profession. The director announced plans for a five-year plan with numbers. Executed - the contract was extended. No goodbye. In such a scenario, Putin would have been calculated long ago. Carlos Ghosn, who created the largest Renault Nissan and brought billions in profits, is now in prison, because he spent some miserable couple of million on his comfort and gave a crooked account of them. This is called the word "responsibility"
    9. -3
      December 29 2019
      In general, the post of president needs to be removed — the king should be chosen for life! To legitimize de jure, what is happening in the country de facto! !!
      1. -1
        December 29 2019
        Yes! Zhirik already proposed this several years ago! )
      2. 0
        December 29 2019
        In general, the post of president needs to be removed — the king should be chosen for life! To legitimize de jure, what is happening in the country de facto! !!


        Do not be stupid !!! There is no talk that the president works in advance until death, as ELECTIONS every 6 years !!! It will be better new - we choose a new one, the old one is satisfied - we leave it.

        In Germany there is no time limit for the Chancellor, well, something no one there introduces the king’s position and does not shout that Merkel has built a new Reich and usurped power.
        1. +2
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
          In Germany, there is no time limit for the Chancellor


          In Germany, the proclamation republic and parliament may dismiss the chancellor. It is impossible to dismiss the president.
          1. 0
            December 30 2019
            According to lawyers, Germany is not a typical parliamentary republic. It is sometimes called a semi-parliamentary republic. Unlike, for example, Italy, they do not have a government as a collegial body. The chancellor bears sole responsibility to the Bundestag. The Chancellor’s Bundestag to resign is much harder than to elect (with subsequent formal appointment as President of the Federal Republic of Germany). It is all about having an institution of a constructive vote of no confidence. Over the 70 years of its existence, the Federal Republic of Germany managed to announce a vote of no confidence in just one chancellor, Helmut Schmidt. And all because the junior coalition partners from the FDP went over to the CDU / CSU side. The chancellor’s power is most often limited by the need to create a coalition of party representatives who hold different positions on many issues.
        2. +5
          December 29 2019
          In which elections did Putin have a real competitor to at least theoretically admit equal chances? There have been no elections in the country for a long time. There is a "kind of approval" according to a pre-mediated scenario, including figures, so that the authorities in the Russian Federation are not perceived as a dictatorship over the hill.
      3. +6
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Thrifty
        In general, the post of president needs to be removed — the king should be chosen for life! To legitimize de jure, what is happening in the country de facto! !!

        how will your proposal sound when Medvedev is moved to the post of tsar?

        But such an option is very possible!
      4. 0
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Thrifty
        In general, the post of president needs to be removed — the king should be chosen for life! To legitimize de jure, what is happening in the country de facto! !!

        Can you go to the DPRK?
      5. 0
        December 29 2019
        Constitutional monarchy is a very real scheme. Many developed countries live in it. But the power of kings is minimal there.
        1. -3
          December 29 2019
          Quote: Robertocalos
          Constitutional monarchy is a very real scheme. Many developed countries live in it. But the power of kings is minimal there.

          Local jingoistic patriots offer the option with the "absolute monarchy"
    10. +5
      December 29 2019
      It's strange. that Putin was the first to speak about the word "in a row". Usually Zhirinovsky is the first to "put forward" ideas that for some reason are being implemented
      1. +3
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Silvestr
        It's strange. that Putin was the first to speak about the word "in a row".

        Apparently because after such a change in the constitution, the counter will reset to zero ... and there will be an opportunity to add another 2 by this time.
    11. +9
      December 29 2019
      Whatever changes to the constitution are proposed, they must be submitted to a national referendum, otherwise each king, having appointed a pocket parliament, will mock her as she wants.
      1. +5
        December 29 2019
        I agree that no one would have questions about the legitimacy of power, all changes and the Constitution should be carried out through a referendum
        Quote: Silvestr
        Quote: Thrifty
        In general, the post of president needs to be removed — the king should be chosen for life! To legitimize de jure, what is happening in the country de facto! !!

        how will your proposal sound when Medvedev is moved to the post of tsar?

        But such an option is very possible!

        And Dimasik already rubs his hands in advance and smiles?
    12. +2
      December 29 2019
      Zhirik continues his secret subversive activities. His work for the US country elites is beyond doubt. Old @ idor and a villain.
    13. +2
      December 29 2019
      Quote: AU Ivanov.
      The leader needs a herd. Unfortunately, we do not have bourgeois democracy. Our wild capitalism has nothing to do with bourgeois democracy. Although he is better than the era of leaders.

      I apologize, but I did not understand how wild capitalism could be better than the era of leaders.
      1. +1
        December 29 2019
        Quote: Astra wild
        how wild capitalism can be better than the era of leaders.


        Leaders do not rule out wild capitalism. Otherwise, the history of Latin America is very curious from this point of view. Have you heard about Somos, Peron, Trujillo? And about Pinochet, Chavez?
        1. +1
          December 29 2019
          I would not put Chavez on a par with Pinochet
          1. 0
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Astra wild
            I would not put Chavez on a par with Pinochet


            Bet or not, but he is a good example of what happens if a politician does not limit his term in office (or if a politician cancels these restrictions).
            1. 0
              December 31 2019
              In fact, Chavez did not cheat on the election. If he did, then the Americans would raise such a high: violation of democracy, etc.
              It’s just that Chávez won without any options thanks to Nationwide support
              1. 0
                January 1 2020
                Chavez amended the Constitution to exceed the time limit.
          2. -4
            December 29 2019
            Quote: Astra wild
            I would not put Chavez on a par with Pinochet

            True, under Pinochet, there was economic growth in Chile, and Chavez drove Venezuela into even greater poverty.
            1. 0
              January 1 2020
              Not certainly in that way. Under Chavez, there was also an increase, then a decline (as well as under Pinochet, by the way). "Has driven Venezuela" already Maduro.
    14. -1
      December 29 2019
      It seems that the Old Man was squeezed. He will be vice president of the union state. And Putin will steer another 2 terms. And there you can and once again change the constitution, if it survives. Old Man no one to the highest post will not allow, no matter how he dreamed. Although he could have won the fair elections. He has no 100 families in his country who use half a budget
    15. +4
      December 29 2019
      They will do everything as they need, and if we are completely shocked by changes in the constitution, then they will ask to be treated with understanding.
      Once already rolled ....
    16. +2
      December 29 2019
      Quote: RUSS
      You live in the past, it’s normal at your age

      Why not remember the past. Everything is relative. If "then" was better for someone, then there are reasons for that. Sometimes it is necessary to look back in order to understand what we have really lost.
    17. 0
      December 29 2019
      Quote: AS Ivanov.
      The herd needs a herd

      The leader is necessary, otherwise nothing will work. Any team under the guidance of a competent and strong-willed leader is able to complete any task. The reason is simple. The leader will be able to lead everyone, captivate with the idea, "burn the hearts of people with a verb." And people will. You don't have to go far for an example. Take, for example, Sergei Pavlovich Korolev. What his team did before our eyes. We still fly into space on HIS rockets. Still.
      And if the leader is a ram, then even the "coolest" team will only be able to bleat.
    18. 0
      December 29 2019
      Quote: Finches
      But Stalin understood this, so huge means went into science

      He understood this because he was a statesman, and set his personal interests far behind. For this alone it is worthy of respect.
      1. 0
        December 29 2019
        GDP is also a statesman. That's just that the GDP and Stalin have different states, with different goals and interests.
        1. 0
          December 30 2019
          DNS, Stalin and Lenin are born every 2 years so that no comparisons
    19. +2
      December 29 2019
      Quote: AlexGa
      It’s strange. And if the head of state successfully fulfills his duties, why change him? A new one will come, he needs time in order to learn how to work successfully successfully. In my opinion, this is a simple copy of Western jokes.

      The fact of the matter is that the state should not care who the president is at the moment. Everything should work without it. The president-guarantor of the constitution determines the direction of foreign and domestic policy. And the state is moving at this time, developing, and not convulsively jerking from side to side.
    20. +4
      December 29 2019
      Quote: AlexGa
      It’s strange. And if the head of state successfully fulfills his duties, why change him? A new one will come, he needs time in order to learn how to work successfully successfully. In my opinion, this is a simple copy of Western jokes.

      Because "the brain freezes and thoughts dry up." A person "turns bronze" and becomes not a generator of new ideas, but a brake on development. Everything is overgrown with family ties, clans, turns into a swamp. And don't rock the boat, you won't get out of the swamp, only it will suck deeper.
    21. +3
      December 29 2019
      Quote: Svarog
      The problem is that they are not building anything, but they have put a device on society .. If they were building, they could already see the result ..

      Here, some said, they say you live in the past. Take a look back. Compare:
      -The Great Patriotic War ended in 1945. The country's gender is in ruins, millions of dead, even more crippled. After 16 years, Gagarin flies into space. Satellites even earlier. The space rocket industry was created from scratch in an open field.
      -The GDP has been in power for almost 20 years. We are still flying the "Gagarin" rocket.
    22. 0
      December 29 2019
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      No one at any enterprise or production dismisses a good leader, engineer or skilled worker just because he has worked in this position for 10 years.

      You confuse the leader and the performer. Performers embody ideas in metal. No ideas, no output. If a leader-generator of ideas sits in one place for a long time and does not move up the career ladder, then he is not capable of more, burns out as a specialist and is not able to benefit the common cause.
    23. +2
      December 29 2019
      Quote: Piramidon
      I lived in the dashing 90s and can compare. There are results.

      Everyone was there. There is something to compare. Let's start comparing with 2000. As of January 2000, 92nd gasoline cost 6-50 (in some places 6-70). How many now ? Well, let's take at the very minimum, 42 rubles. Although next to me is more expensive everywhere. Remembering arithmetic. We receive 27% per year. That is, the average rate of price growth for the 92nd is at least a quarter every year for all 20 years. Every year ALL twenty years. Who's salary or pension has grown by a quarter every year for the past twenty years? I do not have. And in response from TV: "I will not allow a sharp rise in the price of gasoline." The question is: if every year it is “not sharp” by a quarter, then how much “sharp” when?
    24. 0
      December 29 2019
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      And the main person in the country - the president, we want to dismiss in fact only because he has already worked and let another try. The West imposed this norm on us as a time limit and we are still defending it.

      To find out how he worked, you need to compare other similar presidents. The closest neighbors, whom we want to look up to. Germany, Poland, China, Japan, Finland and so on. Has anyone seen a heated discussion on the central channels of the growth in the prosperity of these countries and their citizens in terms of "purchasing power parity" in comparison with Russia, for example? Maybe Solovyov is in the program? In 60 minutes? No, I don't remember that. If we won all, then we (and HE) are great. And if we are at the very end?
    25. 0
      December 29 2019
      Quote: Robertocalos
      There is a grain of sanity. But decisions need to be made and done with responsibility. Then 4 levels of deputies should be - district - city - region - federation. Each consists of members of previous levels. And the electoral college of the president of the most respected people is proportional to the population of the subjects.

      You like the American system, but I don't like it. In my opinion, the electoral system is worse than. general election
    26. 0
      December 29 2019
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      Platoshkin?

      The populist often speaks beautifully, only he lacks competence and professionalism, and maybe he just lies intentionally.

      And did "the very" have competence in 2000? Professionalism? What political party was he the leader of? How long have you been involved in politics? Remind the political program? Command him? Who knew about his existence besides relatives and colleagues? Nobody. And that's why everyone remembers the famous question "Hu of Mr. Putin?" Did you manage? I did it. History and country will appreciate. And Platoshkin is worse? Professional diplomat. He has written many books on the topic of international relations. Why can't he do it? Yes, no worse than "himself". And we will estimate over time.
    27. 0
      December 29 2019
      To the position of vice president
      the staff of employees will be added,
      Press Secretary, etc.
      This is called minimization.
      bureaucratic structures!
    28. 0
      December 30 2019
      There was already one (from Wiki):
      Vice-President of the Russian Federation (until December 25, 1991 - Vice-President of the RSFSR) - one of the highest officials in the Russian Federation from April 24, 1991 to December 25, 1993. He was elected as a single candidate with the president for a 5-year term [1]. A citizen of Russia no younger than 35 and no older than 65 years old, who had the right to vote, could be elected vice-president. He could not be a people's deputy and hold other positions in state and public bodies, entrepreneurial structures.
      The vice-president of Russia, on behalf of the president, exercised his individual powers. In the case of removal of the president from office or his death, resignation or inability to exercise the powers and duties of the president, those passed to the vice president. If it is impossible to fulfill the powers of the President of the Russian Federation by the vice-president of the Russian Federation, they successively passed to the chairman of the Council of Ministers - the Government of the Russian Federation, to the chairman of the Supreme Council of the Russian Federation.
      The post was abolished on December 25, 1993 due to the entry into force of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which does not provide for the position of vice-president of the Russian Federation.

      Alexander Vladimir Rutsky - if anyone does not remember ...
      1. +1
        December 30 2019
        Quote: Serg 122
        Alexander Vladimir Rutsky - if anyone does not remember ...

        From Rutskoi, as from the vice president, it turned out to be like a goat of milk. It’s good that in 1993 he was still not personally killed inside the White House itself.

        Rutskoi in 1991 (by the way, like General A. Lebed) was a "pawn" in someone else's game for power between Yeltsin and Gorbachev. in the game of the same West, namely the United States.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        December 30 2019
        I remember how Rutskoi, from the walls of the White House into a microphone, called on the unarmed population of the country to come to defend the White House. People have come - and many! And all of them were shot by Russian troops!
        Well, how can an unarmed people withstand an army ?!
        It seems that the position of vice president was created in order to shoot and destroy all popular opposition to the anti-people liberal regime of Gorbachev and Yeltsin in the country.

        So the example of the vice-presidency of Rutsky is not entirely successful in socio-historical terms!
        1. +1
          December 30 2019
          I remember well how Rukoi said: "there will be no more mayors, no peers, no dicks"
    29. 0
      December 30 2019
      I don’t understand why this topic has become so relevant? This is some kind of distraction for an unsuitable goal ... I think that the word "in a row" will remain or be excluded - it will not have any meaning. This is zilch, a mental virus. As if they want to cover up something else with this discussion. Namely, the Jesuit law "on the prevention of domestic violence." Which should completely destroy the family we know today. In fact, organizing a family after the adoption of such a law will mean walking through a minefield: you will never know what awaits you tomorrow. Those. this law will result in no one getting married. Bo at any moment you can lose everything: all your property and end up in prison.
    30. 0
      December 30 2019
      Quote: WIKI
      I believe that while in a one-party system, the constitution cannot be changed.

      With a single system, the constitution is an extra attribute
    31. 0
      December 30 2019
      My opinion: send everyone along with the respondent to Kolyma to clean the snow for 15 years.
    32. 0
      December 31 2019
      The man whose faction voted to increase the retirement age is a lackey of the Kremlin, and there can be no question of any opposition. Vaginal gasket Vladimir Volfovich

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"