PLA Navy tested ICBM capable of reaching anywhere in the US

PLA Navy tested ICBM capable of reaching anywhere in the US

The PLA naval forces tested a sea-based ballistic missile capable of reaching anywhere in the United States. This was reported by The Washington Times, citing military sources in the Pentagon.


According to the publication, the latest Chinese ICBMs were launched on Sunday, December 22, from the side of a Jin class nuclear submarine located in Bohai Bay in the northwestern part of the Yellow Sea. The test launch of the JL-3 ICBMs was carried out from underwater position.

The launch of the missile was recorded by the American intelligence satellite and was tracked throughout the flight of ICBMs in a westerly direction. Details of the test, as well as whether it was successful, the source did not disclose.

At the same time, the Pentagon press service said it did not have information about any test of the Chinese ICBMs.

For our part, we note that if the PLA Naval Forces did test the promising ICBM JL-3 (Julong-3, "Juilan-3"), then it will be the third. The first launch was made on November 22, 2018, the second - on June 2, 2019. Presumably, all launches were carried out on board a Project 032 diesel-electric missile boat, which underwent a special modernization to test a new type of ballistic missile.

It is known that the JL-3 solid-fuel rocket is intended to equip the next-generation atomic submarines. The range of the missile is declared in 12 - 14 thousands of kilometers, the warhead carries up to ten separable warheads of individual guidance.

According to American estimates, the new missile will go to equip the next-generation Chinese nuclear missile submarines (supposedly designated as Project 096). Commissioning of the head submarine is expected in the mid-2020s.

The Chinese missile submarines were previously armed with SLBMs (ballistic missile submarines) JL-1. The JL-1 solid fuel rocket was put into service as early as the 80s of the last century. It had a starting mass of 14,7 tons, a length of 10,4 m, a firing range from 1700 to 2500 km, and a one-piece warhead.

Currently, the Chinese submarines of the second generation of the 094 project are armed with JL-2 SLBMs. The missile has a launch weight of 42-45 tons, length 13 m, flight range from 7400 to 8000 km and is capable of carrying either one-piece warhead, or three or four separate head units of individual guidance. Today, the Chinese Navy has five submarines of this project, each of which is equipped with 12 rocket mines.
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

58 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. MoJloT 25 December 2019 17: 05 New
    • 8
    • 14
    -6
    tested a sea-based ballistic missile capable of reaching anywhere in the United States.

    Hooray comrades, congratulations on your significant day!
    1. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 17: 23 New
      • 10
      • 5
      +5
      Quote: MoJloT
      tested a sea-based ballistic missile capable of reaching anywhere in the United States.

      Hooray comrades, congratulations on your significant day!

      Maybe the West will lag behind Russia for a while? And then they’ve already persecuted from all sides .. While all the dogs were let down to Russia and we are fighting back, at that time Turkey and China rose .. And if we unite?
      1. MoJloT 25 December 2019 17: 49 New
        • 6
        • 2
        +4
        Maybe the West will lag behind Russia for a while?
        No, it will not lag behind, they have it in the rank of legislation.
        And if we unite?
        With whom?
        1. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 18: 11 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          Quote: MoJloT
          No, it will not lag behind, they have it in the rank of legislation.

          And historical anger, the Anglo-Squires of Strong Russia do not like! Forever we spoil them all cards hi

          Quote: MoJloT
          With whom?

          Well, with the same China and Turkey, the United States is also glad to bend down .. It is possible that such an alliance is possible .. Although, in order to jump out of dollar dependence and agree on equal terms.!
          After all, the whole world works for these pieces of green toilet paper ..
          And everyone is afraid to say against ..
          1. Shurik70 25 December 2019 21: 46 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            And why the "sources in the Pentagon"?
            When an ICBM is tested, then IS ALWAYS warn everyone. In advance. That the rocket will be single, starts from such and such an area and flies there and there.
            ICBMs are too serious to risk and hope that the “potential adversaries” will have strong nerves and they will not strike back.
            Exceptions are ground ranges, from where they start regularly. But again, on a regular route.
            1. Boa kaa 25 December 2019 23: 49 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: Shurik70
              ALWAYS warn everyone. In advance. That the rocket will be single, starts from such and such an area and flies there and there.

              A bit wrong. Closes for the entry of ships and aircraft over flight a certain square of the oceans, where BB should arrive. Closing time - from 7 to 10 days. But who and where will launch the product / I - this is not reported. After that, all reconnaissance ships climb into a closed area like flies on ... honey. Here, I always have a desire to launch R-27K or Chinese DF-21D SLBMs there in order to verify BB guidance for real purposes! Most importantly, you can not accept any complaints: did we warn you? - Warned! And why did you go there? repeat
      2. Nkv3 25 December 2019 18: 10 New
        • 11
        • 8
        +3
        But has China already expressed a desire?
        To unite?
        China needs so far the super cheap Russian gas that it has already received.
        And the Russian territory for its development, which he also slowly gets a quiet glanders.
        1. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 18: 54 New
          • 2
          • 3
          -1
          Quote: Nkv3
          But has China already expressed a desire?
          To unite?

          Not yet ..!
          Quote: Nkv3
          China needs so far the super cheap Russian gas that it has already received.

          Gas is not the main thing in the historical events of the world ..
          Quote: Nkv3
          And the Russian territory for its development, which he also slowly gets a quiet glanders.

          We’ll always have time to soak, and the Chinese know this, even from Damansk .. yes, and in general we are kind, if we don’t get angry soldier
          PS / such retaliatory measures have been developed since the time of Khrushchev .. Mao was then generally insolent, he felt sorry for Stalin, but he couldn’t poison and provoke .. China then received a nasopharynx, but the plan for .. remained in the archives of the General Staff! And stored (slightly correct and EVERYTHING)))
          1. sergo1914 25 December 2019 22: 23 New
            • 1
            • 2
            -1
            Quote: Zampolit-M
            At that time, China still received a nasopharynx, but the plan for .. remained in the archives of the General Staff! And stored (slightly correct and EVERYTHING)))


            Here is ashibak so much, a slice of slime. How can I write like that, oh Mai Glaz ...
        2. URAL72 25 December 2019 20: 53 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          Cry Yaroslavna. We will not unite, for different global tasks and different potential for live emoticons, every ten times. Different religions and races. But for now, about 50-70 years, nobody will touch us. Further depends on us, guns or oil. Gas, we ourselves do not know what to do, here the Chinese are not just diversification, but a life buoy. But the main thing is that thanks to China, we are staggering the dollar, for example, switching to settlements in national currencies. I would like to scribble a couple of hundred lines, but I'm in a bump, from smart, laziness ...
      3. GibSoN 25 December 2019 19: 29 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Maybe the West will lag behind Russia for a while? And it’s already been harassed from all sides .. Until all the dogs were let down to Russia and we fight back
        You are either "blind" or pretending to be! All the dogs launched in the Russian Federation, as you put it .. the Russian Federation itself is very necessary to attract attention. These same dogs, the result of certain, pre-thoughtful actions on the part of the authorities of the Russian Federation, have certain goals .. Actually, which are clearly not limited to something simple "in a nutshell". This is a certain level of political course. Actually Turkey and China, also links of one chain. Nothing happens out of the blue. At a minimum, much was negotiated in advance. But I note, the game is beautiful.
        1. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 19: 50 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: GibSoN
          You are either "blind" or pretending to be! All the dogs launched in the Russian Federation, as you put it.

          And many of you are still here activated on the site ..? I envy you straight hehe heh
          Quote: GibSoN
          But I note, the game is beautiful.

          Beautiful, but not yet evening .. Russian angry again, it will be something .. hi
          The screech will again be invented by the whole world .. negative
      4. Vladimir_6 25 December 2019 20: 21 New
        • 1
        • 1
        0
        Quote: Zampolit-M
        at this time, Turkey and China rose .. And if we unite?

        If you mean China, then this is not possible. With China, you cannot go along the same road shoulder to shoulder. Only back to back. Their main dream is to clean Siberia. We do not need such allies. So do not relax.
        1. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 20: 50 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Quote: Vladimir_6
          If you mean China, then this is not possible. With China, you cannot go along the same road shoulder to shoulder.

          But with the USA, Israel can hehe laughing Gorbach-EBN attempted the USSR collapsed immediately .... The losses didn’t drown in blood, too, as after an invasion of aliens .. laughing
          It would be better if they immediately began to negotiate with China .. Maybe everything would be different otherwise !!!!!!!! soldier
          And now it’s too late, if we’ll wet everyone .. We have already poisoned the Russian bear from all sides ..
          1. Vladimir_6 25 December 2019 21: 17 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Zampolit-M
            And now it’s too late, if we’ll wet everyone .. We have already poisoned the Russian bear from all sides ..

            We will not wet. This is not our method. I'll throw off the article in PM. Read. soldier hi
      5. Piramidon 25 December 2019 22: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Zampolit-M
        Maybe the West will lag behind Russia for a while?

        Rather, it will not lag behind, but will add sanctions to the "taxers".
    2. Livonetc 25 December 2019 17: 30 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      Comrade Eun probably envies the Chinese comrades in all shades of envy.
      1. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 18: 14 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Livonetc
        Comrade Eun probably envies the Chinese comrades in all shades of envy.

        It is the Chinese who envy him. As he and Obama, Trump agreed ..
        AUGs all took away immediately and Silence !!!!
      2. knn54 25 December 2019 18: 14 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        I think that Comrade Eun "will not rust."
      3. Vladimir_6 25 December 2019 20: 27 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: Livonetc
        Comrade Eun probably envies the Chinese comrades in all shades of envy.

        Comrade Eun is not sitting idle either. From time to time launches Unidentified Flying Objects towards the Sea of ​​Japan.
    3. DED_peer_DED 25 December 2019 18: 49 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: MoJloT
      Hooray comrades, congratulations.

      Us for what?
      1. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 19: 53 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: DED_peer_DED
        Quote: MoJloT
        Hooray comrades, congratulations.

        Us for what?

        Yes he is, just in case hehe heh .. laughing
    4. krillon 25 December 2019 21: 12 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      But is it not able to reach any point in Russia? Or is China somehow bound by treaties? A club of countries possessing similar means and their delivery is expanding. What is there to rejoice or, on principle, the enemy of my enemy, my friend? So China is not an enemy to the states, a competitor, yes. You need to worry about yourself.
  2. opus 25 December 2019 17: 13 New
    • 10
    • 5
    +5
    Quote: author
    the launch of the latest Chinese ICBM was carried out on Sunday, December 22, from the side of a nuclear submarine of the Jin class,


    1. Doesn’t look like an ICBM launch, the flight profile is not the same, the more so at such a range

    2. It does not look like an underwater / surface launch, it hurts to land (dust, dirt, soil) it seems.

    It doesn’t happen on water ... somehow it should be so
    1. Vladimir_2U 25 December 2019 18: 00 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It seems that the rocket is entering the upper atmosphere, in this case the inclination is normal and removed against the background of clouds, and not puffs of smoke (dust) and a spindle-shaped trail is characteristic
      all speaks for it.
      It's just that there is a cone on a higher section and on a darker background.
      1. opus 25 December 2019 18: 09 New
        • 6
        • 1
        +5
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        It seems that the rocket is entering the upper atmosphere,

        if she goes to the top
        Then:
        1. Why such dust? unsettled

        / PS. although it can also be steam, splashes, just a sunset and the angle is such, but a lot of "if the clouds pass"
        2. Why such a "big" rocket.
        Clouds 8-10km?
        3. typical profile of active flight solid propellant ICBMs

        pitch program, as it does not fit with the height

        A space rocket flies along a ballistic trajectory. From this point of view, the flight of intercontinental B.R. fundamentally no different from a space rocket flight. This makes it possible to create universal missiles.


        compare (not correct) but gives an idea of ​​the pitch / height / scale of the rocket
        1. URAL72 25 December 2019 20: 58 New
          • 4
          • 1
          +3
          Opus, plus just for analytical thinking and documentary. Keep it up. But zhurnalyugi could stupidly take frames from the Internet ...
          1. opus 25 December 2019 22: 21 New
            • 3
            • 1
            +2
            Quote: URAL72
            Opus, plusanul

            Velmy Bear

            wink
        2. Vladimir_2U 26 December 2019 04: 24 New
          • 0
          • 1
          -1
          Because you are dumb and blind! In the photo from the article, not dust from the start, but CLOUD! In the photo from the article, the rockets are practically invisible! The photo from the article shows a typical spindle-shaped trace from a rocket at high altitude! The fact that you sculpt all sorts of graphs and tables does not mean that you understand them. It stupidly does not reach you that the cloud in the photo from the article is simply closer and much closer to the lens than a rocket!
          They brought the table, but didn’t even understand that the time for switching the stage OFF was indicated. And clouds can form at altitudes of up to 80 km! A highly cumulus up to 6 km. Although to whom am I writing this? You are blind and stubborn. Communicated already.
          1. alipes 5 February 2020 21: 01 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Correct 6 km to 11-12 km, but otherwise right.
            1. Vladimir_2U 6 February 2020 03: 14 New
              • 1
              • 3
              -2
              Thank you, but after almost a month and a half this is unrealistic. )))
  3. cniza 25 December 2019 17: 20 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    To date, the Chinese Navy has five submarines of this project, each of which is equipped with 12 missile silos.


    China has a full triad ...
  4. Amateur 25 December 2019 17: 29 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    The launch of the missile was recorded by the American intelligence satellite and was tracked throughout the flight of ICBMs in a westerly direction.

    Very well! then they have time to pray and put on diapers.
  5. aries2200 25 December 2019 17: 31 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Christmas present for mattresses from the Chinese proletariat laughing
    1. voyaka uh 25 December 2019 17: 38 New
      • 17
      • 4
      +13
      And why is everyone so sure that this ICBM will be aimed specifically at America?
      With whom China will quarrel, its submarines will be used against that.
      It can be the United States, and India, and Russia.
      1. MoJloT 25 December 2019 17: 50 New
        • 4
        • 3
        +1
        It can be the United States, and India, and Russia.
        With Russia and India, China, and so had enough money to fight, the neighbors after all, but this gift is just the states.
        1. voyaka uh 25 December 2019 18: 01 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Is not a fact. The nuclear submarine with ICBMs is convenient because it can shoot from the ocean in any direction for 10-12 thousand kilometers.
          Approaching (or retreating) to the enemy country at the optimum (for a high trajectory in space) distance.
          With America, China has an economic and prestigious (status) confrontation.
          And the struggle for influence in the Far East. But neither China needs the land of America, nor vice versa - America the Chinese land.
          But with India and Russia, there are direct territorial disputes caused by long-standing historical reasons.
          1. MoJloT 25 December 2019 18: 06 New
            • 4
            • 1
            +3
            With America, China has an economic and prestigious (status) confrontation.
            In our world, if you cannot strike at the United States, they will devour you. This is a security guarantee.
            But with India and Russia, there are direct territorial disputes caused by long-standing historical reasons.
            The last controversial issue with China was resolved in 2004. If you take outer space, whose moon there is all that, well, there is a debate with everyone.
            1. voyaka uh 25 December 2019 18: 19 New
              • 6
              • 1
              +5
              The Chinese do not really recognize the Aigun Treaty of the 19th century, according to which the Far East went to Russia. Arguing that Russia took advantage of China’s temporary weakness, which was waging a war against England and France at the time.
              Be that as it may, Russia and the giant of China have a long common border, and it is naive to think that Chinese ICBMs will only target the distant United States.
              1. Kasym 25 December 2019 20: 25 New
                • 6
                • 1
                +5
                Alexei, I live near China ... The fact is that neither China, nor the Russian Federation, nor India need a war on the continent ... Joint exercises of the SCO countries are an indicator of this. The Chinese, Pakistanis and Indians at the training grounds of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan conduct large-scale exercises ... CICA (meeting on cooperation and confidence-building measures in Asia) was created - security, a joint infrastructure bank - finances ... Roads and pipelines are built ... Thus, there are understanding that trade is important, not war. Asia is becoming self-sufficient and no one needs conflict.
                You just do not live here, as we are in the Middle East. Therefore, I read with interest your comments on cases in the BV region and the Mediterranean.
                But, and soberly assessing the situation ... the United States blocked the Strait of Malacca with its Navy, the United States launched a trade war with Beijing, the United States arms Taiwan and its satellites in the region, the United States supports the Maidan in Hong Kong, the United States calls China its rival, etc. . etc...
                Who, if you are Chinese, will aim and develop your advanced weapons. Everyone understands that it is useless to conquer the PRC or India with Pakistan - it hurts a large population. Moreover, everyone possesses nuclear weapons - it will be a disaster for everyone, use one of them is WMD.
                A simple fact. The Russian Federation is creating a missile attack early warning system in the PRC - this is the highest trust between the two countries. hi
                1. voyaka uh 25 December 2019 23: 56 New
                  • 1
                  • 1
                  0
                  "The fact is that neither China, nor the Russian Federation, nor India need a war on the continent ..." ////
                  ----
                  I agree. But even more so, China and the USA do not need war, the volume of trade between
                  which 800 billion dollars a year. This is an order of magnitude larger
                  than in all Asian economic projects that you have listed.
                  Despite close economic ties, all of these great countries
                  intensively developing strategic nuclear weapons.
                  Not trusting any of their economic partners.
                  This is a sad reality. And so the new Chinese missiles
                  can be aimed at ANY direction.
          2. Boa kaa 26 December 2019 01: 31 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The nuclear submarine with ICBMs is convenient because it can shoot from the ocean in any direction for 10-12 thousand kilometers.

            I agree. But SSBNs should not be detected by PLO (and enemy PLA) forces, at least at the time of the start of prelaunch preparations, when occupying the launch corridor ... And the current Chinese SSBNs are buckets with nuts, rattles at the level of our RPKSN 1- generation ... Our rkkSNy can be hidden in the "bastions", but where type 094 "Jin" to hide from the Elk and the Virgin? In the cords? so 12 miles for the MK-48 tip6 / 7 is not a problem! They have a range of 2 times more ...
            therefore a few thoughts.
            1. Until the new SLBM is brought to mind, it’s not possible to adopt the SSBN type 096 Teng into service ...
            2. The construction and refinement of a new SSBN will take 5-7 years until they become first-line. By this time, the States will complete the construction of Virginia Block 6 ... with very high performance characteristics.
            It is believed that the NK and the BPA will ensure the protection of the RDB of the new Chinese missile carriers. But this will immediately “give out” the SSBN patrol area. Which the amy can “enlighten” through and, if necessary, even boil!
            And two words about the article.
            1. The Chinese have learned our experience (UAV SAROV) and made a diesel-electric missile submarine (SLBM) type 032 ... If they make them several units, and even equip them with VNEU, Japan and South Korea will get a “kirdyk”.
            2. The article has this fragment:
            "The launch of the missile was recorded by the American intelligence satellite and tracked throughout the ICBM flight in a westerly direction."
            and further:
            "At the same time, the Pentagon press service said it did not have information about any test of the Chinese ICBMs."

            Is this secrecy so terrible or the deafness of the Pentagon’s press service?
      2. Nkv3 25 December 2019 18: 15 New
        • 4
        • 8
        -4
        Seditious things for the patriots say.
        For some reason, they are firmly convinced that China is simply burning with the desire to unite with Russia and hit the mattresses.
        1. Eroma 25 December 2019 23: 45 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          The funniest thing is that in the USA there really is no one who is not going to beat! But to be able to strike is extremely important so that you wouldn’t bother yourself on the kumpole soldier
      3. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 18: 24 New
        • 0
        • 1
        -1
        Quote: voyaka uh
        And why is everyone so sure that this ICBM will be aimed specifically at America?

        It’s going to this, because the US and Chinese economies are interconnected ..
        And more precisely, China has already held about 2 trillion dollars in US treasury bills ..
        There is nothing to give the USA if they demand .... HERE and EVERYTHING !!!
        Quote: voyaka uh
        With whom China will quarrel, its submarines will be used against that.

        That's right .. The question is, who will quarrel and for what purpose?
        Quote: voyaka uh
        It can be the United States, and India, and Russia.

        You yourself answered your question !!! Who will quarrel and who will skim the cream again? After the Second World War, there were only a few, and now they are again starting a fraud, already on a larger scale.
        These are the things Alex has in our military base on the Israeli border! bully
        We sit and wait hehe heh wassat
  6. Dmitry Gundorov 25 December 2019 17: 34 New
    • 6
    • 2
    +4
    And anywhere in Russia, this missile will not reach?
    1. opus 25 December 2019 17: 55 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Dmitry Gundorov
      And anywhere in Russia, this missile will not reach?

      1. Before any is not necessary.
      In any case, the Chinese will not clear the territory to the Urals. The European part of them is not interested (or rather, they do not capture it)
      2. The JL-3, also known as the Julong-3, is solid-fueled and has a reported range of over 9,000 km. It is expected to replace the JL-2 SLBM, which is currently paired with China's Type 094 SSBN.
      9000 km

      If cho, then by plane St. Petersburg-Taiwan = 7 km
      1. MoJloT 25 December 2019 17: 58 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Thank you very much drinks
      2. Zampolit-m 25 December 2019 19: 59 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: opus
        In any case, the Chinese will not clear the territory to the Urals. The European part of them is not interested (or rather, they do not capture it)

        And if they try, then China will again become what it was before the days of the USSR! Deliveries of opium again by the Anglo-Saxons will be very useful to them .. hi
  7. awdrgy 25 December 2019 18: 17 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    To any point in Russia, too, in the United States, only a few points are important — very interesting “small” volcanoes and very seismically unstable. They are all located in the west of the country, at a distance of 10-12 thousand km from China, plus or minus targets that are achievable from China
  8. Old Horseradish 25 December 2019 18: 23 New
    • 8
    • 8
    0
    PLA Navy tested ICBM capable of reaching anywhere in the US

    And what kind of fool thinks that they only aim at the USA? They have no territorial claims against the United States. And to Russia they have: Siberia and the Far East at least. All this can turn against Russia in 10 minutes. It is only in the zombies in the head that the Chinas can be allies. There’s a club of fans of China right here, not soldiers, sergeants and officers, although former.
    1. awdrgy 25 December 2019 19: 15 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      So it’s time it’s time to bury the “BUK” along the border
  9. Prisoner 25 December 2019 18: 32 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It's time for pins to negotiate with Russia about the S-500. laughing
  10. KJIETyc 25 December 2019 19: 41 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Quote: voyaka uh
    Is not a fact. The nuclear submarine with ICBMs is convenient because it can shoot from the ocean in any direction for 10-12 thousand kilometers.
    Approaching (or retreating) to the enemy country at the optimum (for a high trajectory in space) distance.
    With America, China has an economic and prestigious (status) confrontation.
    And the struggle for influence in the Far East. But neither China needs the land of America, nor vice versa - America the Chinese land.
    But with India and Russia, there are direct territorial disputes caused by long-standing historical reasons.

    For example, ever-scurrying destroyers and all sorts of AUGs in the South China Sea? And about the long-standing debate - are you talking about Taiwan? I have not heard that Putin would support Taiwan's independence. And the Russian Federation is easier to buy / rent the Chinas, than to fight. Can they buy the USA? And to settle their financial "debt" in the trillions of dollars will obviously not be with the help of Texas virgins, but through wars, now trade ones.
  11. kventinasd 25 December 2019 20: 08 New
    • 3
    • 1
    +2
    Quote: voyaka uh
    But with India and Russia, there are direct territorial disputes caused by long-standing historical reasons.

    You and the Islamic world also have disputes above the roof!
  12. DPN
    DPN 25 December 2019 23: 48 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    A double-edged sword: one for the USA, the second for Russia a matter of time.
  13. 75 Sergey 26 December 2019 00: 09 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    No matter how we fly! With such "friends" and enemies do not.
  14. Old26 26 December 2019 13: 55 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: MoJloT
    tested a sea-based ballistic missile capable of reaching anywhere in the United States.

    Hooray comrades, congratulations on your significant day!

    What congratulations? With a screaming headline? Read carefully to make sure the "greatness" of the event is not given? While removing all the propaganda husk ???

    Quote: Shurik70
    And why the "sources in the Pentagon"?
    When an ICBM is tested, then IS ALWAYS warn everyone. In advance. That the rocket will be single, starts from such and such an area and flies there and there.
    ICBMs are too serious to risk and hope that the “potential adversaries” will have strong nerves and they will not strike back.
    Exceptions are ground ranges, from where they start regularly. But again, on a regular route.

    It's simple, comrade Alexander. NOTAMS are indeed sent out by us and the Americans, especially during launches in the oceans. But here is a completely different matter. This launch was made from the coast of China (the boat was in Bohai Bay, which is about a hundred kilometers from the coast of China, very deep inside the territorial waters of China) and was carried out in WEST DIRECTION, i.e. towards mainland China). Who fixed it - that recorded. The flight range is about 3000 km. This next Chinese “super-rocket” hasn’t flown further than 3000 km and hasn’t carried more than 1-2 warheads ... So the US “killer rocket” is flying at medium range missiles so far