Su-24 simulated the attack of the USS Ross destroyer in the Black Sea with cruise missiles

The American media cite a statement by representatives of the Ukrainian armed forces regarding the situation with the USS Ross destroyer in the Black Sea.

Thus, the Defense Blog publication, which specializes in reporting on military-related events, writes that the command of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces regarded the appearance of Russian Su-24 aircraft in the area of ​​the presence of an American warship as an "imitation of a missile attack on it."

We are talking about the appearance of the Su-24 in neutral (international) airspace over the Black Sea on December 23.

An American resource cites a statement by the AFU press service:

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.

Against this background, the author in the Defense Blog writes that on December 23, the US destroyer "Ross" in the Black Sea "encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."

From the material:

These maneuvers were carried out in the immediate vicinity of the American ship.

The Armed Forces command notes that Russia sent two Su-24s to the area where the American destroyer was located, accompanied by “either Su-27 or Su-30.”

At the moment, USS Ross is located in the port of Odessa.

The US said that the appearance of Ross in the Ukrainian port "demonstrates the continued commitment of the United States to security and stability in the region."

Comments

[olhon]

The US said that the appearance of Ross in the Ukrainian port "demonstrates the continued commitment of the United States to security and stability in the region." Trolling 80 lvl.

[nikon7717]

If the states will regard the appearance of our ships near the island of freedom in full armament with enthusiasm. Throw bonnets, don’t go out on escort, say, Ooh, these are the creators of the world! Even then it will be necessary to escort their ships near their borders and make maneuvers. These comrades are smiling, and holding a knife behind their backs. Checked.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: nikon7717

If the states will regard the appearance of our ships near the island of freedom in full armament with enthusiasm. Throw caps, do not go on escort by aviation,

Great idea. Make a base for our ships in Cuba. And what do they have there in the "launchers" ... But who can say

[Pustogolov]

But you didn’t forget to ask the Cubans - do they need it?

[Deck]

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles

Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?

[nod739]

With a stretch)):

'Special bomb armament includes two RN-28 unguided free-fall aerial bombs with a nuclear charge'
...
Well, a more realistic version of a scout or jammer ...

[Piramidon]

Quote: Deck

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles

Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?

Well, at least the X-35

[Pavel57]

Rather, the X-31.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Pavel57

Rather, the X-31.

I wrote about the X-35.

In addition to the Uran ship complex, the Kh-35 base also includes the Bal coastal anti-ship complex, as well as aviation option (two modifications: for aircraft X-35U and X-35V helicopters). The helicopter version of the missile can be used from helicopters of the Ka-27, Ka-28 and Ka-32A7 type, the aircraft version from the MiG-29K, MiG-29KUB, MiG-29SMT, Su-25TM, Su-30MK, Su-35S, Yak- fighters 141 type front-line bomber Su-24M, Su-24M2, anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142M and other carriers. The variant of the complex with placing the rocket in a standard 20-foot container, designated Club-K, was demonstrated at IMDS-2011 in St. Petersburg. The complex was developed and manufactured by Morinformsistema-Agat OJSC in cooperation with Typhoon OJSC and Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation.

X-35 anti-ship cruise missile.
http://xn--80aafy5bs.xn--p1ai/aviamuseum/dvigateli-i-vooruzhenie/aviatsionnoe-vooruzhenie/sssr/aviatsionnye-rakety/upravlyaemye-rakety/ur-vozduh-poverhnost/protivokorabelnaya-krylataya-raketa-h-35/

[Charik]

for the first time I hear about x35 on the Su24

[Piramidon]

Quote: Charik

for the first time I hear about x35 on the Su24

If you have not heard, then this does not mean that this is not.

The Kh-35U missile has a mass of 550 kg. Of these, 145 kg falls on the warhead. Flight speed - 300 m / s. Range of application - 260 km. Currently, several series of surface ships of the missile boat / corvette class and aircraft have become carriers of the Kh-35U Su-24, Su-30, MiG-29K / KUBR, Su-35S, T-50 and anti-submarine Tu-142, as well as Ka-27, Ka-28 and Ka-52K helicopters. The missile is used as part of the Bal coastal missile system.

https://iz.ru/646068/dmitrii-litovkin-aleksei-ramm/morskikh-i-vozdushnykh-ubiitc-obedinili

The aviation version of the Kh-35 missile can be used from the Russian Air Force and Navy type aircraft Sioux 24M, Su-30, MiG-29K, Su-35S, Tu-142 and Il-38 (after revision). The helicopter version of the missile is used from Ka-27 and Ka-52K helicopters.

https://dfnc.ru/katalog-vooruzhenij/aviatsionnye-rakety-i-bomby/h-35-uran/

[venik]

Quote: Deck

Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?

==========
Kh-35 "Uranus" (anti-ship missile); Kh-25, Kh-29, Kh-59 ("air-to-surface") including can work on mobile surface targets.

[Bongo]

Quote: venik

Quote: Deck

Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?

==========
Kh-35 "Uranus" (anti-ship missile); Kh-25, Kh-29, Kh-59 ("air-to-surface") including can work on mobile surface targets.

Regarding the anti-ship missiles X-35 on the Su-24M can be more detailed? Missiles X-25 and X-29 with a laser and television seeker are unlikely to be able to be used against a ship with modern air defense systems and CMS. The X-59 PRR can be aimed at operating radars, but how many such missiles are in the troops?

[venik]

Quote: Bongo

Regarding the anti-ship missiles X-35 on the Su-24M can be more detailed?

=========
"... On the basis of the Kh-35, in addition to the Uran ship complex, the Bal coastal anti-ship complex, as well as the aircraft version (two modifications: for the Kh-35U aircraft and the Kh-35V helicopters) have been created. The helicopter version of the missile can be used with helicopters of the Ka-27 and Ka-28 type, aircraft - from the MiG-29K, MiG-29SMT, Su-30MK, Su-35, Yak-141 fighters, front-line bomber Su-24M, anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142M and other carriers. .... "(http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/uran/uran.shtml)
---------

Quote: Bongo

The X-59 PRR can be aimed at operating radars, but how many such missiles are in the troops?

=======
I don’t know - I DIDN'T count!
But besides them, the Su-24 can use the X-31P PRR, and the modified Su-24M2 "... According to Russian media reports, combatant Su-24M2s are equipped with "the latest electronic equipment based on solid-state digital electronics and can use the entire range of guided weapons designed for the Su-34 (http://airwar.ru/enc/bomber/su24m2.html)

[Bongo]

Quote: venik

On the basis of the X-35, in addition to the Uran ship complex, the Bal coastal anti-ship complex, as well as the aircraft version (two modifications: for the X-35U aircraft and the X-35V helicopters) were created. The helicopter version of the rocket can be used from the Ka-27 and Ka-28 helicopters, the airborne version from the MiG-29K, MiG-29SMT, Su-30MK, Su-35, Yak-141 fighters, the Su-24M front-line bomber, the Tu- anti-submarine aircraft. 142M and other media. .... "(http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/uran/uran.shtml)

Try to find at least one photo of the X-35 on the Su-24M.

Quote: venik

I don’t know - I DIDN'T count!

I did not doubt it

Quote: venik

But besides them, the Su-24 can use the X-31P PRR

Oh really ? Theoretically, yes, but in practice, no ...

Quote: venik

According to Russian media reports, combatant Su-24M2s are equipped with "the latest electronic equipment based on solid-state digital electronics and can use the entire range of guided weapons developed for the Su-34.

Do you know how "Hephaestus" differs from "Hussar"?

[Bongo]

Friends, so that there is no misunderstanding and uncertainty, I want to share this:
Service and combat use of the Su-24 front-line bomber. Part 1
https://topwar.ru/84850-sluzhba-i-boevoe-primenenie-frontovogo-bombardirovschika-su-24-chast-1-ya.html
Service and combat use of the Su-24 front-line bomber. Part 2
https://topwar.ru/84921-sluzhba-i-boevoe-primenenie-frontovogo-bombardirovschika-su-24-chast-2-ya.html
The co-author of the publications is Sergey Korenkov (Ancient), who has a large raid on the Su-24 / Su-24M and is thoroughly familiar with the capabilities, weapons and avionics of these machines. I hope that the competence of this person deeply respected by me is not in doubt among VO old-timers.

[venik]

Quote: Bongo

Try to find at least one photo of the X-35 on the Su-24M.

======
What a friend you stupid! These missiles (X-59) in the troops are few, these (X-31P) theoretically can be used but practically not, but these (X-35) are not visible on the airplane photos !!!
The last argument is so ridiculous that it is refuted by no less anecdotal argument: "Do you see the gopher? - No. - And he IS!"
-------

Quote: Bongo

But besides them, the Su-24 can use the X-31P PRR
Oh really ? Theoretically, yes, but in practice, no ...

=======
Arguments - "in the studio"! (pliz!)
-------------

Quote: Bongo

Quote: venik
I don’t know - I DIDN'T count!
I did not doubt it

========
Did you - READ? Announce please, "the whole list" (sorry - general number!) .....
-----------

Quote: Bongo

Do you know how "Hephaestus" differs from "Hussar"?

No, not in the know (if, of course, you mean the Hephaestus and Malachite OCD), or rather, in the most general terms!

[Bongo]

Quote: venik

What a friend you stupid!

Man, don’t get personal!

Quote: venik

"Do you see the gopher? - No. - And he IS!"

About the gopher - a strong argument!
Above there is a link to articles about the Su-24. If you find the Ancient One, you should no longer have questions.

[Piramidon]

Quote: Bongo

Try to find at least one photo of the X-35 on the Su-24M.

Maybe you should drive the Su-24 into the yard with a missile on board? There are already a bunch of links given. No - "I don't believe" that's all. Give me a photo, let me feel it. This, dear, already smacks of trolling.

[zyablik.olga]

Quote: Piramidon

Maybe you should drive a Su-24 into the courtyard with a missile on board? There are already a bunch of links given.

Links to reliable sources? In the past, Seryozha made an article (links are given above), which was co-authored by a first class pilot who flew all modifications of the Su-24, who fought in hot spots and at the end of his career served as an instructor pilot at the GLITs in Akhtubinsk. Have you read it, or were you in a hurry to "drive the plane into the yard"? If the knowledge of this person means nothing to you, what to talk about.

Quote: Piramidon

This, dear, already smells of trolling.

Your comment, of course.

[Piramidon]

Quote: zyablik.olga

In the past, Seryozha made an article (links are given above), which was co-authored by a first class pilot who flew all modifications of the Su-24, who fought in hot spots and at the end of his career

I didn’t find anything in the article that the Su-24 could not carry the X-35.
Tu-142 could carry a torpedo with a nuclear filling, but in 28 years I have never seen it either "alive" or in a photo. But this does not mean that they were not. Yes, the "deaf and dumb" brought her several times and hung her up for training, but they set up a cordon and the bomb bay area was covered with tarpaulin screens.

[Bongo]

Quote: Piramidon

I didn’t find anything in the article that the Su-24 could not carry the X-35.
Tu-142 could carry a torpedo with a nuclear filling, but in 28 years I have never seen it either "alive" or in a photo. But this does not mean that they were not. Yes, the "deaf and dumb" brought her several times and hung her up for training, but they set up a cordon and the bomb bay area was covered with tarpaulin screens.

Excuse me, but when was the aircraft torpedo with a "special" warhead developed, and when was the X-35? Yes, it is probably incorrect to compare nuclear weapons with conventional weapons. By the beginning of mass production of the X-35, the Su-24M front-line bomber was already considered obsolete, and therefore the missile was not introduced into its armament.

[YOUR]

From such a distance - not by what. Maybe only bombs.
This Defense Blog is sucking all sorts of rubbish out of a finger. Although no, it’s not them, I read the original, they refer to sources in the Armed Forces.

[Charik]

x-31, x-29 mb x-59

[Invoce]

“Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, and then returned to the airfield.

Again, half the Ross crew will be charged to shore! The other half will refuse to enter the Black Sea ...
What to do? but the Americans come in to train, to prepare for something ...

Against this background, the author in the Defense Blog writes that on December 23, the US destroyer "Ross" in the Black Sea "encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."

Why then smear the snot and complain about the "unprofessionalism" of Russian pilots? Professionals with a capital letter. We are always ready to meet sworn partners and learn how to attack in conditions close to combat! I am also sure that our planes saw only at the moment of their flight over the deck of "Ross", and the electronics on the destroyer behaved strangely and inadequately at that moment!

[Vol4ara]

Quote: Invoce

“Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, and then returned to the airfield.

Again, half the Ross crew will be charged to shore! The other half will refuse to enter the Black Sea ...

Unfortunately, the crew was written off ashore only in the mouth of the yellow press of the Russian Federation

[Fan-fan]

Are you hinting at why the Su-24 did not use the Khibiny again? I, too, ask myself a question, why, after all, the Khibiny worked so well with "Donald Cook" before, they raised such patriotism in our country, why didn't they repeat it again?

[Starover_Z]

One destroyer thousands of miles from its shores for security in the region? It's ridiculous!

that the US Navy destroyer “in the Black Sea” “encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft” on December 23.

We have the right to fly in international airspace! But one ship of a probable "partner" with missile weapons on board near our shores does not contribute to peace!

[andrewkor]

But interestingly, what diapers do American sailors have? Their astronauts use them to the full.

[Fraracol_2]

Again, brave spirit-raising fakes will go, which the urapatriots will suck in for six months with rapture and delight among themselves.

[Nastia makarova]

Of course, it's nice when they run out of diapers !!!!

[Same lech]

pseudo-patriots will suck with emotion and delight among themselves for six months.

What wind brought you to our penates from the banks of the Potomac do not like our patriots there are US patriots on American sites ... you go there.

[Chaldon48]

I don’t know how the US patriots show themselves, but the “Patriots”, as practice has shown, defend the honor of the United States somehow not very cleverly.

[bessmertniy]

Forgive my naivety, but it seems to me that the Americans specially send their warships to the Black Sea so that our aviation will work out their tricks on them.

[orionvitt]

Judging by the statements, tricks are strange.

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles

Cruise missiles, in fact, are launched over many hundreds (if not thousands) of kilometers from the target. To do this, it is not necessary to fly directly over enemy ships. Russian pilots simply indicated their presence, however, in the west and especially in Ukraine, immediately pu ....., well, in general it was torn.

[nod739]

And what cruise missiles on the su-24?

[Piramidon]

Quote: nod739

And what cruise missiles on the su-24?

Su-24 can carry anti-ship missiles X-35 "Uran".

[orionvitt]

Quote: nod739

And what cruise missiles on the su-24?

X-59. It was just imprisoned under the SU-24.

[Pavel57]

Cruise missiles, in fact, are launched over many hundreds (if not thousands) of kilometers from the target.

Thousands is a fantasy. Moreover, if we are talking about the Su-24 - 100, a maximum of 200 km.

[Yngvar]

bessmertniy (Victor)
You're right! Young "chicks" need to be trained on something ... Well, if you just scare them away, then remember how in the Soviet Union our pilot dumped fuel on the deck of an aircraft carrier. I wonder how much the crew then scrubbed the deck?

[tihonmarine]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

What wind brought you to our penates from the banks of the Potomac

As soon as the site went live, the Potomac Boys came along. Any patriotic and anti-Western site is flooded with them.

[Xnumx vis]

Are you from this American destroyer? What impressions did you have for dinner, like your Mary and Kinder, all about, kay?

[Vol4ara]

Quote: Fraancol_2

Again, brave spirit-raising fakes will go, which the urapatriots will suck in for six months with rapture and delight among themselves.

Already gone, it is amazing how they have not yet remembered about the Khibiny. But the crew was already written off ashore, and they did not forget about diapers

[lis-ik]

Quote: andrewkor

diapers for American sailors

I really thought I couldn’t wait, but no such comments are more alive than all living things.

[Fraracol_2]

Well, how can you not wait, let's go right away. All this is still very funny to them. There are still enough "eccentrics", although I see they already less believe in this nonsense.

[Same lech]

December 23, the destroyer "Ross" of the US Navy in the Black Sea "encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."

And what did he want ... he pinned to our border in full armor with bad intentions ... or something to meet him ... the Syrians fully felt in their own skin the presence of American destroyers at their borders ... a hundred Tomahawks in their territory these are no longer toys.
I propose to conduct such maneuvers of our aircraft every day until this destroyer is removed from our borders and far away from the US.

[Uncle lee]

"Faced with multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."

Namely: they threw bull-calves and bottles, spat on the deck and dropped a bag of husk from seeds!

[mark1]

moreover, one of the pilots opened the lantern and shouted - "there is no better beauty than .... from a height!" urinated from a dive onto the battle bridge.

[Uncle lee]

Quote: mark1

to the combat bridge.

Thus disrupting the operation of all radars!

[mark1]

What radars are there! - BIUS was irrevocably disabled and damaged the commander's coffee!

[Uncle lee]

BIUS - to hell with it, fix it, or replace it! Coffee sorry, Turkish, last ....

[Fraracol_2]

Well, who is wiser? CIUS, wash clothes, coffee, feces, licked, radars, urinated, snot, bull-calves, bottles, spat, sniffed, bags with husks from seeds, shake, diapers ... Well, what else? Abyrvalg. Competition for Sharikov?

[fighter angel]

And you envy silently.
On the "shores of the Potomac" they will not teach this ...
With this they are born!
Your "amers-team" is not given that.

[Fan-fan]

Well, let the people rejoice, at least they avenged on the Americans, otherwise it turns out they only do nasty things to us, and then the damned Americans got the full answer for SP-2.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: The same LYOKHA

Syrians fully felt in their own skin the presence of American destroyers at their borders ..

Yes, the whole world feels the "diplomacy of American gunboats" in its own skin.

[Mavrikiy]

The command of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

"The conductor, on the eve of the drunkenness, erupted on the navel!" (V. Vysotsky)

[Chaldon48]

No, it’s strange that the hegemon will be allowed to mimic the attack of our borders by strategic bombers, but for some reason Russian planes over neutral waters cannot fly where they consider it necessary.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Mavrikiy

"The conductor, on the eve of the drunkenness, erupted on the navel!" (V. Vysotsky)

And quickly licked everything that is possible with relatives of Uncle Sam.

[tungus111]

Yes, everything is stable with them, they kicked off as usual, who and how could. Gee ...

[hydrox]

It is not good to defecate on American decks, this may be misinterpreted (as a friendly hello, for example ) And again: such greetings are discarded without Hephaestus, and the slip will be interpreted as neglect - this is inhospitable.
Well, does this Ross really not deserve a gift in the form of 4-6 half-ton bombs?
The crews of more than one hundred Russian bombers dream of being involved in such a gift (I believe that even the Swans do not disdain )

[tihonmarine]

Quote: hydrox

Well, does this Ross really not deserve a gift in the form of 4-6 half-ton bombs?

It is better to discard 4-6 containers loaded with feces.

[Golovan Jack]

Quote: tihonmarine

It’s better to dump 4-6 containers loaded with feces.

Ask the local ROSS, he knows how.

By the way, in the Permian Komi "ross" is "broom"

[Well done]

Frightened again? It is not even clear who is more - Americans or APU. And what military maneuvers are considered NOT aggressive?

[cost]

Welldone (Ilya):Frightened again? It is not even clear who is more - Americans or APU.

APU Campaign

The Armed Forces command notes that Russia sent two Su-24s to the area where the American destroyer was located, accompanied by “either Su-27 or Su-30.”

Such statements can only be made out loud while in an ostrich pose.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Welldone

And what military maneuvers are considered NOT aggressive?

Those who fly "quiet and low".

[Well done]

Can you imagine if a pair of SU-24s flew over the USS Ross "quietly and low"! This is a karachun for the gentle, tolerant destroyer crew! Dembel for health reasons is provided!

[Gray brother]

And nefig was an attack on Kaliningrad to imitate what you sow - you will reap.

[SeregaBoss]

Scarecrow of hegemon, slaves drift, that’s scary

[hydrox]

Do not spare the slaves, they can no longer express admiration for the feat of a lonely American trough for a visit to the World Cup.

[Mouse]

The command of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces regarded the appearance of Russian Su-24 aircraft in the area of ​​the presence of the American warship as an "imitation of a missile attack on it."

I don’t understand .... now what, in the area of ​​the presence of the American warship, no one is allowed to be present? completely beguiled the shore ....

[hydrox]

Our people are still training in approaching a ground attack: the silhouette is on the screen, the view in the sight, the calculation of how to crumple the mast antennas (the plane "swells" after dropping bombs) ...) - WHILE training ...

[Aliken]

Scream. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are "concerned" with aircraft more than the American command, this is agility, they licked so licked, notably.

[Masha]

Quote: Aliken

The Ukrainian Armed Forces is "concerned" with aircraft more than the American command

such a talent! predict the desire of the owner ....
If you want to curry favor with your superiors, it is important not to work more than your colleagues, but to work 15 minutes more than your superiors ...

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Aliken

Scream. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are "concerned" with aircraft more than the American command,

Well, the Sumerians do not like the fact that Russian planes imitate an attack on American ships, even if they withdraw their ships instead of American ones, Russian pilots still have no one to train over.

[withoutreverse]

the campaign there imitated the entire Air Force of the Black Sea Fleet)
-The Su-30 fighter of the Russian Air Force conducted a series of attacks on the destroyer of the US Navy in the Black Sea.
According to press publications, the Russian fighter staged a herd hunt for the USS Ross destroyer as it approached the territorial waters of Russia.

https://vpk-news.ru/news/54332

[Vladimir_2U]

How strange, the Iranian Boeing was shot down at one time, they did not hesitate, and here is a whole "imitation of an attack", and in response there is only concern, and even from ukrovoinstva. What amertsy have become modest.

[Dynamic systems]

"... The United States said that the appearance of the Ross in the Ukrainian port" demonstrates the continued commitment of the United States to security and stability in the region .... "
The whole world knows the answers to these questions of security and stability. It is strange that they did not say that this Russia reached the destroyer, peacefully standing in neutral waters.

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Dynamic Systems

"Demonstrates a continued US commitment to security and stability in the region ...."

The whole world has heard this since the foundation of the US by the world capital. It looks like the Bill of Human Rights, but in reality it's the other way around.

[2 Level Advisor]

give in .. and the ICBM mine somewhere in the taiga did not imitate an attack on Washington and Kiev .. but what? hot news for ukroSMI

[antiaircrafter]

From the material:
These maneuvers were carried out in the immediate vicinity of the American ship.

These maneuvers were carried out in close proximity to the Russian coast.
It will be more correct to say so.

[Invoce]

have a laugh What the Americans fought for and ran into ... They are such teachings!

[Lord of the Sith]

And rightly so, there is nothing to relax the Yankees rolls))
Our Black Sea.

[cniza]

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.

If so, that they thought we would applaud them ...

[Prisoner]

"The American media cite a statement by representatives of the Ukrainian armed forces regarding the situation with the USS Ross destroyer in the Black Sea ..." (c) Well, how can you not knock. It's against your own nature to act.

[Dzafdet]

It was necessary to work out a bombardment on him in real life. We would have tested aiming systems and ammunition. Soon, after all, the war will begin with them.

[potap6509]

In Odessa, cowards are exchanged for independent bloomers so that they don’t fall out on the way back ....

[rocket757]

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.

And what about the stay of a warship far from its mother country, near our shores? How is the "steamer of friendship" ???
What they run into, they get ... nothing personal, just training, for the future, if that!

[awdrgy]

Well, that's right, there is nothing to "ensure security and stability" where it is not necessary

[svp67]

At the moment, USS Ross is located in the port of Odessa.

Do you wash the laundry?

[Ros 56]

Instead of horseradish hanging around, stamp your head in your Mexican puddle and then your pants will be dry.

[smaug78]

Oh my God, how low the resource has lowered. This stupid fake a few days ago was published by some dim-witted liar on Yandex Zen, without links, etc. Well, topwar again showed how it is rapidly turning yellow.

[75 Sergey]

Or maybe bombing?
Or maybe he wanted to say hello and say hello?

[Oyo Sarkazmi]

"We won't give money, but feed the sailors!" - Trump.

[bratchanin3]

the appearance of Ross in the Ukrainian port “demonstrates the continued US commitment to security and stability in the region ...

.
Rather, it is more the reality of peacetime, rather than peace and security when the United States appears in the region. Practice shows that where the United States appears, military operations or coups d'etat begin and everyone knows about it, even the last grandmother in our village.

[75 Sergey]

It has always been, is and will be with them and with us.

[DMB-2020]

Could these missiles with unpredictable trajectories cause trouble in Evenkia, near the village of Baykit, Krasnoyarsk Territory? Was there a missile launch or missiles could not be tracked and no one noticed the launch?

[Forest]

Why go into the ship's radar zone to launch a cruise missile?
Obviously they lie and apparently it is for domestic consumption.

[Alexey-74]

May stability and security be provided on the American continent. And the boys did everything right. Respect to the pilots.

[Joker62]

Are the Yankees really so afraid of our old man "Su-24" that they complain to their State Department and the Pentangon ??? And also world warriors .. . ugh, shameful ...

[Pavel57]

They are afraid of the hotel from the Su-24. They could not intercept the X-31s in the early 90s, when several X-31s in the target version were transferred to them in friendship.

[Nosferatu]

It was necessary to drop to 150 meters and go to supersonic directly above it. _pin_do_sy would experience very unexpected emotions.

[a2kut]

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of a cruise missile air strike, after which the ROSS crew "stuck bears" and movement on the destroyer's deck was seriously hampered

[GibSoN]

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.

Have sunk ... Whoever says what, this is a real shame for the whole country! When you need to "draw", but nothing more stupid, does not come to mind .. Why? Show what? If you are confident in yourself, why, to someone, to prove something? How to scare that? In real life, the Su-24 would have crouched almost immediately after takeoff .. In the best case for him, he would not have flown even within the range of radar. This is enchanting nonsense. It remains only naked ... to show.

[bober1982]

Quote: GibSoN

Have come ... Whoever said that, this is a real shame for the whole country!

Indeed, they have come here, as you rightly put it, but who distributes all this nonsense - the command of the Air Force (?) Of Ukraine, they need to be dishonored, and what a shame for the whole country.

Quote: GibSoN

What for? Show what? If you are confident in yourself, why, to someone, to prove something?

Nobody proved anything to anyone, this is not necessary, such approaches to a real goal are very useful for everyone, each side fulfills and solves combat missions, then draw conclusions.

Quote: GibSoN

In the best case for him, he would not even have flown over the range of the radar.

At the extreme low altitude (from 50 m and less), the Su-24 can not be stopped.

[Shuttle]

These maneuvers were carried out in the immediate vicinity of the American ship.

Let them say thanks for not being inside the American ship.

[certero]

In general, it is very strange that ours does not take such a cool opportunity to practice.