Su-24 simulated the attack of the USS Ross destroyer in the Black Sea with cruise missiles


The American media cite a statement by representatives of the Ukrainian armed forces regarding the situation with the USS Ross destroyer in the Black Sea.


Thus, the Defense Blog publication, which specializes in reporting on military-related events, writes that the command of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces regarded the appearance of Russian Su-24 aircraft in the area of ​​the presence of an American warship as an "imitation of a missile attack on it."

We are talking about the appearance of the Su-24 in neutral (international) airspace over the Black Sea on December 23.

An American resource cites a statement by the AFU press service:

Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.

Against this background, the author in the Defense Blog writes that on December 23, the US destroyer "Ross" in the Black Sea "encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."

From the material:

These maneuvers were carried out in the immediate vicinity of the American ship.

The Armed Forces command notes that Russia sent two Su-24s to the area where the American destroyer was located, accompanied by “either Su-27 or Su-30.”

At the moment, USS Ross is located in the port of Odessa.

The US said that the appearance of Ross in the Ukrainian port "demonstrates the continued commitment of the United States to security and stability in the region."
Photos used:
site of the company "Sukhoi"
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. olhon 25 December 2019 07: 52 New
    • 15
    • 4
    +11
    The US said that the appearance of Ross in the Ukrainian port "demonstrates the continued commitment of the United States to security and stability in the region." Trolling 80 lvl. laughing
    1. nikon7717 25 December 2019 08: 09 New
      • 34
      • 3
      +31
      If the states will regard the appearance of our ships near the island of freedom in full armament with enthusiasm. Throw bonnets, don’t go out on escort, say, Ooh, these are the creators of the world! Even then it will be necessary to escort their ships near their borders and make maneuvers. These comrades are smiling, and holding a knife behind their backs. Checked.
      1. Mountain shooter 25 December 2019 08: 26 New
        • 9
        • 5
        +4
        Quote: nikon7717
        If the states will regard the appearance of our ships near the island of freedom in full armament with enthusiasm. Throw caps, do not go on escort by aviation,

        Great idea. Make the base of our ships in Cuba. And what they have there in the "launchers" ... But who will say tongue
        1. Pustogolov 25 December 2019 23: 28 New
          • 1
          • 3
          -2
          But you didn’t forget to ask the Cubans - do they need it?
      2. Deck 25 December 2019 08: 54 New
        • 15
        • 1
        +14
        Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles


        Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?
        1. nod739 25 December 2019 09: 15 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          With a stretch)):

          'Special bomb weapons include two unguided free-fall aerial bombs RN-28 with a nuclear charge'
          ....
          Well, a more realistic version of a scout or jammer ...
        2. Piramidon 25 December 2019 09: 29 New
          • 6
          • 2
          +4
          Quote: Deck
          Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles


          Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?

          Well, at least the X-35
          1. Pavel57 25 December 2019 09: 55 New
            • 3
            • 2
            +1
            Rather, the X-31.
            1. Piramidon 26 December 2019 22: 41 New
              • 0
              • 1
              -1
              Quote: Pavel57
              Rather, the X-31.

              I wrote about the X-35.
              In addition to the Uran ship complex, the Kh-35 base also includes the Bal coastal anti-ship complex, as well as aviation option (two modifications: for aircraft X-35U and X-35V helicopters). The helicopter version of the missile can be used from helicopters of the Ka-27, Ka-28 and Ka-32A7 type, the aircraft version from the MiG-29K, MiG-29KUB, MiG-29SMT, Su-25TM, Su-30MK, Su-35S, Yak- fighters 141 type front-line bomber Su-24M, Su-24M2, anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142M and other carriers. The variant of the complex with placing the rocket in a standard 20-foot container, designated Club-K, was demonstrated at IMDS-2011 in St. Petersburg. The complex was developed and manufactured by Morinformsistema-Agat OJSC in cooperation with Typhoon OJSC and Tactical Missile Weapons Corporation.

              X-35 anti-ship cruise missile.
              http://xn--80aafy5bs.xn--p1ai/aviamuseum/dvigateli-i-vooruzhenie/aviatsionnoe-vooruzhenie/sssr/aviatsionnye-rakety/upravlyaemye-rakety/ur-vozduh-poverhnost/protivokorabelnaya-krylataya-raketa-h-35/
          2. Charik 26 December 2019 19: 12 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            for the first time I hear about x35 on the Su24
            1. Piramidon 26 December 2019 22: 19 New
              • 1
              • 1
              0
              Quote: Charik
              for the first time I hear about x35 on the Su24

              If you have not heard, then this does not mean that this is not.
              The Kh-35U missile has a mass of 550 kg. Of these, 145 kg falls on the warhead. Flight speed - 300 m / s. Range of application - 260 km. Currently, several series of surface ships of the missile boat / corvette class and aircraft have become carriers of the Kh-35U Su-24, Su-30, MiG-29K / KUBR, Su-35S, T-50 and anti-submarine Tu-142, as well as Ka-27, Ka-28 and Ka-52K helicopters. The missile is used as part of the Bal coastal missile system.

              https://iz.ru/646068/dmitrii-litovkin-aleksei-ramm/morskikh-i-vozdushnykh-ubiitc-obedinili

              The aviation version of the Kh-35 missile can be used from the Russian Air Force and Navy type aircraft Sioux 24M, Su-30, MiG-29K, Su-35S, Tu-142 and Il-38 (after revision). The helicopter version of the missile is used from Ka-27 and Ka-52K helicopters.

              https://dfnc.ru/katalog-vooruzhenij/aviatsionnye-rakety-i-bomby/h-35-uran/
        3. venik 25 December 2019 10: 53 New
          • 4
          • 2
          +2
          Quote: Deck
          Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?

          ==========
          X-35 "Uranus" (RCC); X-25, X-29, X-59 (air-to-surface), including can work on moving surface targets.
          1. Bongo 25 December 2019 12: 34 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            Quote: venik
            Quote: Deck
            Do not tell me which anti-ship missiles the Su-24 can attack the destroyer?

            ==========
            X-35 "Uranus" (RCC); X-25, X-29, X-59 (air-to-surface), including can work on moving surface targets.

            Regarding the anti-ship missiles X-35 on the Su-24M can be more detailed? Missiles X-25 and X-29 with a laser and television seeker are unlikely to be able to be used against a ship with modern air defense systems and CMS. The X-59 PRR can be aimed at operating radars, but how many such missiles are in the troops?
            1. venik 25 December 2019 13: 26 New
              • 2
              • 2
              0
              Quote: Bongo
              Regarding the anti-ship missiles X-35 on the Su-24M can be more detailed?

              =========
              "... On the basis of the X-35, in addition to the Uran ship complex, the Bal coastal anti-ship complex was also created, as well as the aviation version (two modifications: for the X-35U aircraft and X-35B helicopters). The helicopter version of the missile can be used with helicopters of the Ka-27 and Ka-28 type, aircraft - from the MiG-29K, MiG-29SMT, Su-30MK, Su-35, Yak-141 fighters front-line bomber Su-24M, anti-submarine aircraft Tu-142M and other carriers. .... "(http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/uran/uran.shtml)
              ---------
              Quote: Bongo
              The X-59 PRR can be aimed at operating radars, but how many such missiles are in the troops?

              =======
              I don’t know - I DIDN'T count!
              But besides them, the Su-24 can use the X-31P PRR, and the modified Su-24M2 "... According to Russian media reports, the Su-24M2 combatant ships are equipped with "the latest electronic equipment made on the basis of solid-state digital electronics and can be used the entire range of guided weapons designed for the Su-34 (http://airwar.ru/enc/bomber/su24m2.html)
              1. Bongo 25 December 2019 13: 33 New
                • 8
                • 2
                +6
                Quote: venik
                In addition to the Uran ship system, the Kh-35 also created the Bal coastal anti-ship complex, as well as the aviation version (two modifications: for the Kh-35U aircraft and the Kh-35V helicopters). The helicopter version of the missile can be used from helicopters of the Ka-27 and Ka-28 type, the aircraft version from the MiG-29K, MiG-29SMT, Su-30MK, Su-35, Yak-141 fighters, Su-24M front-line bomber, Tu-anti-submarine aircraft 142M and other carriers. .... "(http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/uran/uran.shtml)

                Try to find at least one photo of the X-35 on the Su-24M.
                Quote: venik
                I don’t know - I DIDN'T count!

                I did not doubt it no
                Quote: venik
                But besides them, the Su-24 can use the X-31P PRR
                Oh really ? Theoretically, yes, but in practice, no ... no
                Quote: venik
                According to Russian media, the Su-24M2 combatant equipped with "the latest electronic equipment made on the basis of solid-state digital electronics and can use the entire range of guided weapons designed for the Su-34

                Do you know how "Hephaestus" differs from "Hussar"?
                1. Bongo 25 December 2019 14: 58 New
                  • 6
                  • 0
                  +6
                  Friends, so that there is no misunderstanding and uncertainty, I want to share this:
                  Service and combat use of the Su-24 front-line bomber. Part 1
                  https://topwar.ru/84850-sluzhba-i-boevoe-primenenie-frontovogo-bombardirovschika-su-24-chast-1-ya.html
                  Service and combat use of the Su-24 front-line bomber. Part 2
                  https://topwar.ru/84921-sluzhba-i-boevoe-primenenie-frontovogo-bombardirovschika-su-24-chast-2-ya.html
                  The co-author of the publications is Sergey Korenkov (Ancient), who has a large raid on the Su-24 / Su-24M and is thoroughly familiar with the capabilities, weapons and avionics of these machines. I hope that the competence of this person deeply respected by me is not in doubt among VO old-timers.
                2. venik 25 December 2019 19: 05 New
                  • 1
                  • 2
                  -1
                  Quote: Bongo
                  Try to find at least one photo of the X-35 on the Su-24M.

                  ======
                  What a friend you stupid! These missiles (X-59) in the troops are few, these (X-31P) theoretically can be used but practically not, but these (X-35) are not visible on the airplane photos !!!
                  The last argument is so ridiculous that it is refuted by a no less anecdotal argument: "Do you see the gopher? - No. - But he - IS!" laughing
                  -------
                  Quote: Bongo
                  But besides them, the Su-24 can use the X-31P PRR
                  Oh really ? Theoretically, yes, but in practice, no ...

                  =======
                  Arguments - "to the studio"! (pliiz!)
                  -------------
                  Quote: Bongo
                  Quote: venik
                  I don’t know - I DIDN'T count!
                  I did not doubt it

                  ========
                  And you - counted? Announce the “whole list” (sorry - general number!) .....
                  -----------
                  Quote: Bongo
                  Do you know how "Hephaestus" differs from "Hussar"?

                  No, not in the know (if of course you mean OCD "Hephaestus" and "Malachite"), or rather, in the most general terms!
                  1. Bongo 26 December 2019 00: 13 New
                    • 1
                    • 1
                    0
                    Quote: venik
                    What a friend you stupid!

                    Man, don’t get personal!
                    Quote: venik
                    "Do you see a gopher? - No. - And he - IS!"

                    About the gopher - a strong argument! good
                    Above there is a link to articles about the Su-24. If you find the Ancient One, you should no longer have questions. no
                3. Piramidon 26 December 2019 22: 24 New
                  • 0
                  • 3
                  -3
                  Quote: Bongo
                  Try to find at least one photo of the X-35 on the Su-24M.

                  Maybe you should drive a Su-24 into the courtyard with a missile on board? There are already a bunch of links given. No, “I don’t believe” and that’s it. Give a photo, give a touch. This, dear, already smells of trolling.
                  1. zyablik.olga 27 December 2019 00: 14 New
                    • 2
                    • 0
                    +2
                    Quote: Piramidon
                    Maybe you should drive a Su-24 into the courtyard with a missile on board? There are already a bunch of links given.

                    Links to reliable sources? no Seryozha made an article in the past (the links are given above), co-authored by a first-class pilot who flew all versions of the Su-24, fought in “hot spots” and served as an instructor pilot at the GLITs in Akhtubinsk at the end of his career. Did you read it, or rushed to "drive the plane into the yard"? If the knowledge of this person does not mean anything to you, what to talk about. request
                    Quote: Piramidon
                    This, dear, already smells of trolling.

                    Your comment, of course.
                    1. Piramidon 27 December 2019 00: 27 New
                      • 0
                      • 1
                      -1
                      Quote: zyablik.olga
                      Seryozha made an article in the past (links are given above), co-authored by a first-class pilot who flew all modifications of the Su-24, fought in “hot spots” and at the end of his career

                      I didn’t find anything in the article that the Su-24 could not carry the X-35.
                      The Tu-142 could carry a nuclear-powered torpedo, but for 28 years I have never seen it either live or in the photo. But this does not mean that they were not. Yes, the "deaf-mute" brought and hung it several times for training, but put up a cordon and closed the bomb bay area with tarpaulin screens.
                      1. Bongo 27 December 2019 07: 25 New
                        • 1
                        • 1
                        0
                        Quote: Piramidon
                        I didn’t find anything in the article that the Su-24 could not carry the X-35.
                        The Tu-142 could carry a nuclear-powered torpedo, but for 28 years I have never seen it either live or in the photo. But this does not mean that they were not. Yes, the "deaf-mute" brought and hung it several times for training, but put up a cordon and closed the bomb bay area with tarpaulin screens.

                        Excuse me, when did you develop an aviation torpedo with a "special" warhead, and when did the X-35? Yes, it is probably incorrect to compare nuclear weapons with conventional weapons. By the beginning of mass production of the X-35, the Su-24M front-line bomber was already considered obsolete, and therefore the rocket was introduced into its armament.
        4. YOUR 25 December 2019 13: 23 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          From such a distance - not by what. Maybe only bombs.
          This Defense Blog is sucking all sorts of rubbish out of a finger. Although no, it’s not them, I read the original, they refer to sources in the Armed Forces.
        5. Charik 26 December 2019 19: 11 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          x-31, x-29 mb x-59
    2. Invoce 25 December 2019 09: 03 New
      • 6
      • 19
      -13
      “Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, and then returned to the airfield.

      Again, half the Ross crew will be charged to shore! The other half will refuse to enter the Black Sea ... recourse
      What to do? request but the Americans come in to train, to prepare for something ...
      Against this background, the author in the Defense Blog writes that on December 23, the US destroyer "Ross" in the Black Sea "encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."

      Well then smear the snot and complain about the "unprofessionalism" of Russian pilots? Professionals with a capital letter. Always ready to meet sworn partners and learn how to attack in conditions close to combat! I’m sure that we saw our aircraft only at the time of their flight over the Ross deck, and the electronics on the destroyer behaved strangely and inadequately at that moment! wink good
      1. Vol4ara 25 December 2019 10: 49 New
        • 9
        • 2
        +7
        Quote: Invoce
        “Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, and then returned to the airfield.

        Again, half the Ross crew will be charged to shore! The other half will refuse to enter the Black Sea ...

        Unfortunately, the crew was written off ashore only in the mouth of the yellow press of the Russian Federation
        1. Fan-fan 25 December 2019 21: 01 New
          • 2
          • 1
          +1
          Are you hinting at why the Su-24 did not use Khibiny again? I’m also wondering why, because the Khibiny had worked so well with Donald Cook before, they raised such patriotism in our country, why didn’t they repeat it again?
    3. Starover_Z 25 December 2019 12: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      One destroyer thousands of miles from its shores for security in the region? It's ridiculous!
      that the US Navy destroyer “in the Black Sea” “encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft” on December 23.

      In the international airspace we have the right to fly! But one ship of a probable "partner" with missile weapons on board near our coast does not contribute to peace!
  2. andrewkor 25 December 2019 07: 53 New
    • 12
    • 22
    -10
    But interestingly, what diapers do American sailors have? Their astronauts use them to the full.
    1. Fraracol_2 25 December 2019 07: 55 New
      • 15
      • 55
      -40
      Again, brave spirit-raising fakes will go, which the urapatriots will suck in for six months with rapture and delight among themselves.
      1. Nastia makarova 25 December 2019 08: 00 New
        • 14
        • 13
        +1
        Of course, it's nice when they run out of diapers !!!!
      2. Same lech 25 December 2019 08: 02 New
        • 24
        • 9
        +15
        pseudo-patriots will suck with emotion and delight among themselves for six months.

        What wind brought you to our penates from the banks of the Potomac belay do not like our patriots there are US patriots on American sites ... you go there.
        1. Chaldon48 25 December 2019 08: 21 New
          • 10
          • 3
          +7
          I don’t know how the US patriots show themselves, but the Patriots, as practice has shown, protect the honor of the United States somehow very deftly.
          1. bessmertniy 25 December 2019 08: 29 New
            • 10
            • 0
            +10
            Forgive my naivety, but it seems to me that the Americans specially send their warships to the Black Sea so that our aviation will work out their tricks on them. repeat
            1. orionvitt 25 December 2019 08: 39 New
              • 20
              • 0
              +20
              Judging by the statements, tricks are strange.
              Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles
              Cruise missiles, in fact, are launched over many hundreds (if not thousands) of kilometers from the target. To do this, it is not necessary to fly directly over enemy ships. Russian pilots simply indicated their presence, however, in the west and especially in Ukraine, immediately pu ....., well, in general it was torn.
              1. nod739 25 December 2019 09: 13 New
                • 1
                • 4
                -3
                And what cruise missiles on the su-24?
                1. Piramidon 25 December 2019 09: 37 New
                  • 4
                  • 1
                  +3
                  Quote: nod739
                  And what cruise missiles on the su-24?

                  Su-24 can carry anti-ship missiles X-35 Uranus.
                2. orionvitt 25 December 2019 15: 50 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  Quote: nod739
                  And what cruise missiles on the su-24?

                  X-59. It was just imprisoned under the SU-24.
              2. Pavel57 25 December 2019 14: 02 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Cruise missiles, in fact, are launched over many hundreds (if not thousands) of kilometers from the target.

                Thousands is a fantasy. Moreover, if we are talking about the Su-24 - 100, a maximum of 200 km.
            2. Yngvar 25 December 2019 12: 48 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              bessmertniy (Victor)
              You're right! Young “chicks” need to be trained on something ... Well, if you just scare them away, then remember how in the Soviet Union our pilot dumped fuel onto the deck of an aircraft carrier. I wonder how many crews then torn the deck?
        2. tihonmarine 25 December 2019 09: 15 New
          • 5
          • 3
          +2
          Quote: The same Lech
          What wind brought you to our penates from the banks of the Potomac

          As soon as the site appeared, so the "Potomac guys" appeared. Any patriotic and anti-Western sites are awash with them.
      3. Xnumx vis 25 December 2019 08: 28 New
        • 7
        • 3
        +4
        Are you from this American destroyer? What impressions did you have for dinner, like your Mary and Kinder, all about, kay?
      4. Vol4ara 25 December 2019 10: 51 New
        • 5
        • 2
        +3
        Quote: Fraancol_2
        Again, brave spirit-raising fakes will go, which the urapatriots will suck in for six months with rapture and delight among themselves.

        Already gone, it is amazing how they have not yet remembered about the Khibiny. But the crew was already written off ashore, and they did not forget about diapers
    2. lis-ik 25 December 2019 08: 51 New
      • 7
      • 4
      +3
      Quote: andrewkor
      diapers for American sailors

      I really thought I couldn’t wait, but no such comments are more alive than all living things.
      1. Fraracol_2 25 December 2019 09: 07 New
        • 5
        • 13
        -8
        Well, how can you not wait, let's go right away. Very much all this is still ridiculous to them. "Eccentrics" is still enough, although I look less believe in this nonsense.
  3. Same lech 25 December 2019 07: 54 New
    • 18
    • 0
    +18
    December 23, the destroyer "Ross" of the US Navy in the Black Sea "encountered multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."

    And what did he want ... he pinned to our border in full armor with bad intentions ... or something to meet him ... the Syrians fully felt in their own skin the presence of American destroyers at their borders ... a hundred Tomahawks in their territory these are no longer toys.
    I propose to conduct such maneuvers of our aircraft every day until this destroyer is removed from our borders and far away from the US.
    1. Uncle lee 25 December 2019 08: 21 New
      • 14
      • 1
      +13
      "Faced with multiple aggressive maneuvers of Russian aircraft."
      Namely: they threw bull-calves and bottles, spat on the deck and dropped a bag of husk from seeds! am
      1. mark1 25 December 2019 08: 47 New
        • 11
        • 2
        +9
        moreover, one of the pilots opened the lantern and shouted, “Better there is no beauty than .... from a height!” urinated with a dive on a combat bridge.
        1. Uncle lee 25 December 2019 08: 49 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: mark1
          to the combat bridge.

          Thus disrupting the operation of all radars!
          1. mark1 25 December 2019 08: 53 New
            • 6
            • 0
            +6
            What radars are there! - BIUS was irrevocably disabled and damaged the commander's coffee!
            1. Uncle lee 25 December 2019 08: 56 New
              • 6
              • 0
              +6
              BIUS - to hell with it, fix it, or replace it! Coffee sorry, Turkish, last .... crying
              1. Fraracol_2 25 December 2019 11: 56 New
                • 5
                • 9
                -4
                Well, who is wiser? CIUS, wash clothes, coffee, feces, licked, radars, urinated, snot, bull-calves, bottles, spat, sniffed, bags with husks from seeds, shake, diapers ... Well, what else? Abyrvalg. Competition for Sharikov?
                1. fighter angel 25 December 2019 12: 18 New
                  • 4
                  • 3
                  +1
                  And you envy silently.
                  On the "banks of the Potomac," this will not be taught ...
                  With this they are born!
                  Your "Amerz team" is not given.
                2. Fan-fan 25 December 2019 21: 07 New
                  • 0
                  • 3
                  -3
                  Well, let the people rejoice, at least they avenged on the Americans, otherwise it turns out they only do nasty things to us, and then the damned Americans got the full answer for SP-2.
    2. tihonmarine 25 December 2019 09: 21 New
      • 2
      • 4
      -2
      Quote: The same Lech
      Syrians fully felt in their own skin the presence of American destroyers at their borders ..

      Yes, the whole world is feeling the "diplomacy of American gunboats."
  4. Mavrikiy 25 December 2019 07: 55 New
    • 6
    • 1
    +5
    The command of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
    "The conductor on the eve of the booze dodged on the navel!" (V. Vysotsky)
    1. Chaldon48 25 December 2019 08: 27 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      No, it’s strange that the hegemon will be allowed to mimic the attack of our borders by strategic bombers, but for some reason Russian planes over neutral waters cannot fly where they consider it necessary.
    2. tihonmarine 25 December 2019 09: 24 New
      • 4
      • 2
      +2
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      "The conductor on the eve of the booze dodged on the navel!" (V. Vysotsky)

      And quickly licked everything that is possible with relatives of Uncle Sam.
  5. tungus111 25 December 2019 07: 56 New
    • 8
    • 7
    +1
    Yes, everything is stable with them, they kicked off as usual, who and how could. Gee ...
    1. hydrox 25 December 2019 08: 35 New
      • 7
      • 3
      +4
      It is not good to defecate on American decks, this may be misinterpreted (as a friendly hello, for example laughing ) And again: such greetings are discarded without Hephaestus, and the slip will be interpreted as neglect - this is inhospitable.
      Well, does this Ross really not deserve a gift in the form of 4-6 half-ton bombs? lol
      The crews of more than one hundred Russian bombers dream of involvement in such a gift (I believe that even the Swans do not disdain lol)
      1. tihonmarine 25 December 2019 09: 26 New
        • 1
        • 2
        -1
        Quote: hydrox
        Well, does this Ross really not deserve a gift in the form of 4-6 half-ton bombs?

        It is better to discard 4-6 containers loaded with feces.
        1. Golovan Jack 25 December 2019 10: 11 New
          • 8
          • 7
          +1
          Quote: tihonmarine
          It’s better to dump 4-6 containers loaded with feces.

          Ask the local ROSS, he knows how.

          By the way, in the Komi-Permyak, Ross is a broom wink
  6. Well done 25 December 2019 07: 57 New
    • 11
    • 1
    +10
    Frightened again? It is not even clear who is more - Americans or APU. And what military maneuvers are considered NOT aggressive?
    1. rich 25 December 2019 08: 31 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Welldone (Ilya):Frightened again? It is not even clear who is more - Americans or APU.

      APU Campaign
      The Armed Forces command notes that Russia sent two Su-24s to the area where the American destroyer was located, accompanied by “either Su-27 or Su-30.”

      Such statements can only be made out loud while in an ostrich pose.
    2. tihonmarine 25 December 2019 09: 27 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Welldone
      And what military maneuvers are considered NOT aggressive?

      Those that fly "quietly and lowly."
      1. Well done 25 December 2019 09: 42 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        laughing And imagine if a couple of SU-24 flew over the USS Ross "quietly and lowly!" This is a karachun to the gentle, tolerant crew of the destroyer! Dembel for health reasons provided! drinks
  7. Gray brother 25 December 2019 08: 05 New
    • 16
    • 1
    +15
    And nefig was an attack on Kaliningrad to imitate what you sow - you will reap.
  8. SeregaBoss 25 December 2019 08: 08 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    Scarecrow of hegemon, slaves drift, that’s scary laughing
    1. hydrox 25 December 2019 08: 41 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Do not spare the slaves, they can no longer express admiration for the feat of a lonely American trough for a visit to the World Cup.
  9. Mouse 25 December 2019 08: 09 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    The command of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces of the Armed Forces regarded the appearance of Russian Su-24 aircraft in the area of ​​the presence of the American warship as an "imitation of a missile attack on it."

    I don’t understand .... now what, in the area of ​​the presence of the American warship, no one is allowed to be present? belay completely beguiled the shore ....
    1. hydrox 25 December 2019 08: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Ours are still training in approaching the attack: the silhouette there on the screen, view in the sight, calculation of how to crush the mast antennas (the plane "swells" after dropping the bombs) ...) - while training ...
  10. Aliken 25 December 2019 08: 14 New
    • 21
    • 1
    +20
    Scream. The Armed Forces of Ukraine are "preoccupied" with airplanes more than the American command, it’s agility;
    1. Masha 25 December 2019 08: 32 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Aliken
      APU "preoccupied" with planes more than the US command

      such a talent! predict the desire of the owner .... laughing
      If you want to curry favor with your superiors, it is important not to work more than your colleagues, but to work 15 minutes more than your superiors ... wink
    2. tihonmarine 25 December 2019 09: 33 New
      • 2
      • 2
      0
      Quote: Aliken
      Scream. APU is "preoccupied" with planes more than the US command,

      Well, the Sumerians do not like the fact that Russian planes imitate an attack on American ships, even if they withdraw their ships instead of American ones, Russian pilots still have no one to train over.
  11. withoutreverse 25 December 2019 08: 22 New
    • 7
    • 1
    +6
    the campaign there imitated the entire Air Force of the Black Sea Fleet)
    -The Su-30 fighter of the Russian Air Force conducted a series of attacks on the destroyer of the US Navy in the Black Sea.
    According to press publications, the Russian fighter staged a herd hunt for the USS Ross destroyer as it approached the territorial waters of Russia.

    https://vpk-news.ru/news/54332
  12. Vladimir_2U 25 December 2019 08: 22 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Oddly enough, the Iranian Boeing was shot down at the time, did not hesitate, and here the whole "imitation of the attack", and in response only concern, and even from the stolen goods. Some Americans modest steel.
  13. Dynamic systems 25 December 2019 08: 32 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    "... The United States said that the appearance of Ross in the Ukrainian port" demonstrates the continued commitment of the United States to security and stability in the region .... ".
    The whole world knows the answers to these questions of security and stability. It is strange that they did not say that this Russia reached the destroyer, peacefully standing in neutral waters.
    1. tihonmarine 25 December 2019 09: 42 New
      • 1
      • 1
      0
      Quote: Dynamic Systems
      "Demonstrates a continued US commitment to security and stability in the region ...."

      This has already been heard by the whole world since its founding in US capital. It looks like everything in the Bill of Human Rights, but in reality it’s the opposite.
  14. 2 Level Advisor 25 December 2019 08: 49 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    give in .. and the ICBM mine somewhere in the taiga did not imitate an attack on Washington and Kiev .. but what? hot news for ukroSMI laughing
  15. antiaircrafter 25 December 2019 08: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    From the material:
    These maneuvers were carried out in the immediate vicinity of the American ship.


    These maneuvers were carried out in close proximity to the Russian coast.
    It will be more correct to say so.
  16. Invoce 25 December 2019 09: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    laughing have a laugh What the Americans fought for and ran into ... They are such teachings! laughing
  17. Lord of the Sith 25 December 2019 09: 15 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    And rightly so, there is nothing to relax the Yankees rolls))
    Our Black Sea.
  18. cniza 25 December 2019 09: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.


    If so, that they thought we would applaud them ...
  19. Prisoner 25 December 2019 09: 24 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    "The American media cite a statement by representatives of the Ukrainian Armed Forces regarding the situation with the USS Ross destroyer US Navy in the Black Sea ..." (c) Well, how not to hit it. It’s against your nature to speak. winked
  20. Dzafdet 25 December 2019 09: 32 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    It was necessary to work out a bombardment on him in real life. We would have tested aiming systems and ammunition. Soon, after all, the war will begin with them.
  21. potap6509 25 December 2019 10: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In Odessa, cowards are exchanged for independent bloomers so that they don’t fall out on the way back ....
  22. rocket757 25 December 2019 10: 07 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.

    And how to stay a warship far from its metropolis, near our shores? How is the "ship of friendship" ???
    What they run into, they get ... nothing personal, just training, for the future, if that!
  23. awdrgy 25 December 2019 10: 08 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, the right thing is nothing to "ensure security and stability" where it is not necessary
  24. svp67 25 December 2019 10: 26 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    At the moment, USS Ross is located in the port of Odessa.
    Do you wash the laundry?
  25. Ros 56 25 December 2019 10: 39 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    Instead of horseradish hanging around, stamp your head in your Mexican puddle and then your pants will be dry.
  26. smaug78 25 December 2019 11: 01 New
    • 2
    • 1
    +1
    Oh my God, how low the resource has lowered. This stupid fake a few days ago was published by some dim-witted liar on Yandex Zen, without links, etc. Well, topwar again showed how it is rapidly turning yellow.
  27. 75 Sergey 25 December 2019 12: 17 New
    • 0
    • 2
    -2
    Or maybe bombing?
    Or maybe he wanted to say hello and say hello?
  28. Oyo Sarkazmi 25 December 2019 12: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    "We won’t give money, but feed the sailors!" - Trump.
  29. bratchanin3 25 December 2019 12: 38 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the appearance of Ross in the Ukrainian port “demonstrates the continued US commitment to security and stability in the region ...
    .
    Rather, it is more the reality of peacetime, rather than peace and security when the United States appears in the region. Practice shows that where the United States appears, military operations or coups d'etat begin and everyone knows about it, even the last grandmother in our village.
  30. 75 Sergey 25 December 2019 12: 54 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    It has always been, is and will be with them and with us.
  31. DMB-2020 25 December 2019 13: 23 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Could these missiles with unpredictable trajectories cause trouble in Evenkia, near the village of Baykit, Krasnoyarsk Territory? Was there a missile launch or missiles could not be tracked and no one noticed the launch?
  32. Forest 25 December 2019 14: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Why go into the ship's radar zone to launch a cruise missile?
    Obviously they lie and apparently it is for domestic consumption.
  33. Alexey-74 25 December 2019 15: 38 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    May stability and security be provided on the American continent. And the boys did everything right. Respect to the pilots.
  34. Joker62 25 December 2019 16: 36 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Is the Yankees so afraid of our old man "Su-24" that they complain to their State Department and Pentangon ??? belay And also world warriors .. negative . ugh, shameful ... laughing
    1. Pavel57 25 December 2019 17: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      They are afraid of the hotel from the Su-24. They could not intercept the X-31s in the early 90s, when several X-31s in the target version were transferred to them in friendship.
  35. Nosferatu 25 December 2019 18: 04 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It was necessary to drop to 150 meters and go to supersonic directly above it. _pin_do_sy would experience very unexpected emotions.
  36. a2kut 25 December 2019 20: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which the ROSS crew "mounted bears" and the movement on the deck of the destroyer was seriously hindered
  37. GibSoN 25 December 2019 21: 34 New
    • 1
    • 4
    -3
    Russian aircraft carried out a maneuver typical of an airstrike with cruise missiles, after which they returned to the airfield.
    Have come ... Whoever said that, this is a real shame for the whole country! When you need to "draw", but nothing more dumb, it never occurs .. Why? Show what? If you are confident in yourself, why, to someone, to prove something? How to scare it? In real life, the Su-24 would crouch almost immediately after take-off .. In the best case for it, it would not even fly up to the range of the radars. This is enchanting nonsense. It remains only bare ... show.
    1. bober1982 26 December 2019 07: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: GibSoN
      Have come ... Whoever said that, this is a real shame for the whole country!

      Indeed, they have come here, as you rightly put it, but who distributes all this nonsense - the command of the Air Force (?) Of Ukraine, they need to be dishonored, and what a shame for the whole country.
      Quote: GibSoN
      What for? Show what? If you are confident in yourself, why, to someone, to prove something?

      Nobody proved anything to anyone, this is not necessary, such approaches to a real goal are very useful for everyone, each side fulfills and solves combat missions, then draw conclusions.
      Quote: GibSoN
      In the best case for him, he would not even have flown over the range of the radar.

      At the extreme low altitude (from 50 m and less), the Su-24 can not be stopped.
  38. Shuttle 26 December 2019 13: 07 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    These maneuvers were carried out in the immediate vicinity of the American ship.

    Let them say thanks for not being inside the American ship.
  39. certero 26 December 2019 17: 03 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In general, it is very strange that ours does not take such a cool opportunity to practice.