The New Yorker said Ernst admitted a plot error on Channel One about the downed MH17

72

The publication The New Yorker published material written by Joshua Jaffa, dedicated to the personality of the General Director of Channel One of Russia Konstantin Ernst. The material tells how in the 1999 year the appeal of the then President of the Russian Federation Boris Yeltsin with his famous “I was tired. I'm leaving". Also about how the recording of that appeal was made and how Ernst himself was surprised when he saw a text in front of him that Yeltsin was going to pronounce instead of the traditional New Year's greetings.

Ernst’s words about the first actions of Vladimir Putin after Yeltsin’s departure from power, about Putin’s visit to the North Caucasus and about the need to stop the collapse of Russia are cited.



The material also dealt with how the main channel of the country was “pulled out” from the hands of Berezovsky. Allegedly, it all started with reports on the death of the Kursk submarine, when the president was outraged by the supply of material and when he himself went to meet with the relatives of the sailors to tell people the truth.

Jaffa tells his readers that Ernst, as the general director of Channel One, made the broadcast of the inauguration of the President of the Russian Federation, the Victory Day parades from Red Square, more “ambitious”. Ernst himself calls "the creative director of the Kremlin."

From the material:

Ernst considers himself a statesman.

A Western journalist writes that Channel One of Russian television "underestimated the number of hostages in the Beslan school."

Moreover, the author notes that the “First” conveys information with “taste and content”. The material criticizes the "Russia" shopping center and specifically Dmitry Kiselyov - his famous words about "radioactive ash" are cited with a note that they do not allow themselves to do this on the First. About how Russia is presented as an enemy and almost a hellish place on Earth on American TV channels, of course, there is no talk in The New Yorker ...

The article discusses the topic of the Malaysian Boeing shot down over the Donbass.

Of Articles:

In November 2014 of the year, the so-called "sensational" footage was broadcast on Channel One: a satellite image, allegedly taken by Western intelligence agencies and transmitted to Russia by American scientists, designed to demonstrate the attack of an aircraft by a Ukrainian fighter. “The image supports a version of events that was hardly heard in the West,” the host said. (...) When I asked Ernst why his channel voiced something so easily refuted, he replied that this was a simple mistake: “Yes, we people, we made a mistake, but not on purpose. ”

Based on this, the author of the material claims that the false facts are not "catastrophic" for the channel, but act as an "integral part of propaganda."

It is noteworthy that the article is not a classic interview, but a set of judgments of the author himself interspersed with the fact that he talked with someone about something or from someone about something (about that - including about Ernst) heard.
72 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +68
    11 December 2019 06: 26
    Channel One has long been a dump with stories of who stole a woman from whom or who gave birth to an illegal child. Constant shnyaga about debauchery in "cultural" circles.
    1. +25
      11 December 2019 06: 28
      And what are the rest of the best ones better?
      1. +15
        11 December 2019 07: 28
        Quote: Fraancol_2
        And what are the rest of the best ones better?

        Not only in Russia.
        Everywhere.
        1. +11
          11 December 2019 08: 31
          do not care at all. we live in Russia
        2. +7
          11 December 2019 09: 42
          And why be surprised if ALL media (as well as finance) are in the hands of the "elite"
        3. +8
          11 December 2019 11: 36
          And don’t talk. What happiness I experienced when my digital set-top box was covered and I can no longer watch TV. But before, as a drug addict, everyone was staring at delirium. Yol-Pali, a person with a higher education, a school teacher ... Indeed, modern television (any) is the opium of the people.
          And hockey can be viewed via the Internet.
          1. +4
            11 December 2019 12: 49
            Quote: PalBor
            Verily, modern television (any) is the opium of the people.
            And hockey can be viewed via the Internet.

            If television is opium, then professional sport is an opium needle.
            I was lucky, back in 1985, our TV broke down. I haven't seen a blue screen for half a year. And I woke up !!! After all, the whole world is around!
            It is not for nothing that those who are addicted to the spectacle of sports are called sick people. “he is a fan of Spartacus,” or someone else. Fan.
            And if it’s really interesting to know, it’s better to read than to watch.
            1. 0
              11 December 2019 20: 06
              Quote: Shurik70
              No wonder those who are hooked on the spectacle of sports are called sick people.

              Sports, this is still normal (although I myself do not watch sports or TV in general, especially in Ukraine, it is simply impossible to watch, you can get brain cancer like half of the country). I don’t understand how you can watch endless series about anything.
        4. 0
          11 December 2019 17: 29
          We have SBS fake news, but ABC is more neutral. The difference is immediately visible.
      2. +6
        11 December 2019 10: 25
        Channel "Culture" from the central. Quite a decent channel.
    2. +13
      11 December 2019 06: 37
      That's right, one solid dirty laundry. And not only on the First.
      1. +1
        11 December 2019 17: 32
        Parents had Russian TV through a plate. When I visited them there was no desire to watch their TV, loss of time, nothing interesting.
    3. +23
      11 December 2019 06: 39
      The first channel, Russia, etc., is impossible to watch, even my elderly mother already understood. News without news from Russia. So shamefully to lose the body of the audience it is necessary to try very hard.
      1. +15
        11 December 2019 06: 50
        And I probably haven’t been watching Channel 1 for seven years now — the last TV was dead. And I draw news from the Internet, where there are many more interesting resources than the first. Although it’s not a problem to reach him. But for some reason even such a thought has not yet come up.
        1. +19
          11 December 2019 07: 37
          I draw news from the Internet

          very "objective" source laughing laughing laughing
          and what do you boast about? In general, you need to boast about the ability to separate truth from fiction, the ability to abstract from the imposed opinion. And not by replacing some "garbage" sources with others
          1. 0
            11 December 2019 12: 42
            Quote: Ka-52
            Actually, one should boast about the ability to separate truth from fiction, the ability to abstract oneself from an imposed opinion.

            Well, now he will tell you how he gets information from several trusted sources, and then thoughtfully analyzes it)))) We know, we know, we have already heard such things like "Analyze this"))))
        2. +3
          11 December 2019 17: 35
          Sobchak earns 1,5 million dollars a year on his website. How many fools visit her?
      2. 0
        11 December 2019 12: 41
        Quote: Civil
        News without news from Russia.

        Come on, you have to understand that "News without news from Russia" is an ordinary meme, and nothing more. Tell me, did you and your sasa watch a lot of "Village Hour" for example in Soviet times? Oddly enough, but they usually show what gets into the rating. And if you are shown Ukraine and dirty linen from morning till night, then these are just echoes of that very rating.
        1. 0
          11 December 2019 17: 18
          Quote: tomket
          Oddly enough, they usually show what gets into the rating.

          This rating was created artificially to distract the average person from real problems. Start on the central heating station to discuss internal problems, involving experts from more than one chicken house known to all, and you will get a completely different rating with other topics.
    4. -2
      11 December 2019 06: 47
      The first channel has long been a garbage dump ....

      What time, such and channels.
      Against the background of many others, the First still looks nothing. Tolerant.
      Socialism must be returned. And a political instructor to every media editor. To not deviate from the right course.
    5. +3
      11 December 2019 07: 13
      Quote: Vladimir16
      Channel One has long been a dump with stories of who stole a woman from whom or who gave birth to an illegal child. Constant shnyaga about debauchery in "cultural" circles.

      And I like "Let's get married." The transformation of a dowager, from the beautiful Larisa to the full, tastelessly dressed Aunt Guzeeva for many years live laughing
      1. +1
        11 December 2019 07: 33
        Quote: Krasnodar
        ... aunt Guzeeva for many years live

        Yeah, and also the matchmaker Syabitova, who teaches how to behave with her husband ... lol
        1. +3
          11 December 2019 07: 37
          Quote: AlexVas44
          Quote: Krasnodar
          ... aunt Guzeeva for many years live

          Yeah, and also the matchmaker Syabitova, who teaches how to behave with her husband ... lol

          Rosochka has a small gesheft - to play his fictitious weddings for the sake of dough from gifts)))
    6. +1
      11 December 2019 07: 26
      I have not been to Thailand for a long time. There, the cable ort for Germany is twisted. VOOOOT where about the unknown country news .. Just not about Russia for sure!)))
      1. +6
        11 December 2019 09: 28
        Quote: PalSanych
        I have not been to Thailand for a long time. There, the cable ort for Germany is twisted. VOOOOT where about the unknown country news .. Just not about Russia for sure!)))

        and what is wrong? we in Germany only watch your channels, more believable than European media. The RT channel is generally the norm.
        1. 0
          11 December 2019 17: 39
          Every day I watch RT news. They lie, they don’t agree either, but less than the Western media.
    7. +3
      11 December 2019 10: 32
      Our media, the man of labor is not interesting. So they drag all kinds of glamorous mucus, such as Dzhigurda, Panin, Svolochkova, etc.
    8. 0
      12 December 2019 22: 10
      Galkin, Malakhov, this polio-smart doctor needs to be driven from the first channel.
  2. +6
    11 December 2019 06: 27
    The frames were really shameful.
  3. +4
    11 December 2019 06: 37
    If you score in the same "YouTube", for example, "fakes of Russian TV", then a whole mountain of "reports" is displayed there, and it is so simple ... "... But not on purpose ..."
  4. +11
    11 December 2019 06: 52
    When I was in China for the first time in 2011, I was very surprised by the content of news channels about events within the country and abroad. No chernukha, only positive news from the life of the country. Foreign news was restrained and brief. Only once savored on the news about the Japanese damage from the typhoon, the Chinese like a balm for the soul.
    1. +4
      11 December 2019 08: 43
      Quote: Nitochkin
      No chernukha, only positive news from the life of the country. Foreign news was restrained and brief. Only once savored

      It was. Passed. Then "glasnost". Now we have what we have.
      1. 0
        12 December 2019 22: 13
        "It was. Passed." ... That then, that now there was no balance. Either a hype about pregnant actresses who don't know from whom to give birth, or news from the fields. After all, neither the first nor the second is needed.
  5. +20
    11 December 2019 06: 53
    Ernst considers himself a statesman.
    If Ernst is a statesman, then I am a Spanish pilot. I’m lying around like a Malakhov cross, Let's get married, Only a notorious statesman can put a fashionable sentence and other dregs, of course. Not to mention propogand x, from which the ears are wrapped with a tube. With such statists no enemies are needed.
    1. +6
      11 December 2019 07: 42
      what people want is a channel and sets. any channel beats for the audience. it is their bread. I have a mom, for example, let's get married looking constantly. true to the record. but looks) and people like her milenos)))
      1. +6
        11 December 2019 07: 53
        This is called stupidity and brainwashing. In fact, the First, by definition, should be the mouthpiece of the state, conveying the position of the country's leaders to the population. The fact that he is supposedly a private structure and must "fight for the audience" is utter nonsense. And how he beats, obviously:
        Channel One, which has been losing viewers for years, will receive additional assistance from the federal budget.

        About state financing:
        In 2020, Channel One may receive 6,5 billion rubles. from the budget for the production and purchase of content. The Ministry of Finance proposes to allocate 24,2 billion rubles for financing VGTRK.

        So do not say that the channel puts what people want to see. The audience runs away from the proposed content, because it is not the content, but the real gag.
        1. 0
          11 December 2019 07: 59
          this is called giving the audience the product that she asks) they are not forced to watch. I'm sorry, but by what definition should it be a mouthpiece?) who said that?) Yes, even if it is a mouthpiece. if you don’t fight for the audience, then who will watch all this?) Entertainment content will always attract more people than news.
          1. +5
            11 December 2019 08: 05
            this is called giving the audience the product that she asks)
            Excuse me, are you able to read? The audience is scattering. Do you want to say that it runs away from the product that it asks for itself? This is something new for me. I come to the kebab maker, I say: "Give me, dear, a kebab!" - and run. Well yes, I always do that laughing
            1. -1
              11 December 2019 08: 16
              so I didn’t say that they successfully do it actually) I just said that this should be done with any funding) and it can run away for a bunch of reasons. such as that their content has lost to another channel in quality or something else. I don’t dispute this.
          2. +2
            11 December 2019 08: 46
            Quote: carstorm 11
            they are not forced to look.

            So they vote by "running away".
      2. +2
        11 December 2019 08: 44
        Quote: carstorm 11
        what people want is a channel and sets.

        I doubt it very much ...
      3. 0
        11 December 2019 17: 42
        And we have about cooking mostly. laughing
    2. 0
      11 December 2019 12: 46
      Quote: Dalny V
      Let's get married, Only a notorious statesman can put a fashionable sentence and other dregs, of course. Not to mention propogand x, from which the ears are wrapped with a tube. With such statists no enemies are needed.

      I have more claims to promote Dude. I would like to clarify with Ernst after that, whose country he is a statesman.
  6. +13
    11 December 2019 07: 00
    Good morning everyone! But this type can be safely called the main gravedigger of Russian television.
  7. +3
    11 December 2019 07: 40
    It is noteworthy that the article is not a classic interview, but a set of opinions of the author himself interspersed with the fact that he talked with someone about something or from someone about something (about someone - including Ernst) he heard.
    In my opinion, this is called - "the creation and distribution of fakes" that have nothing to do with reality.
  8. +1
    11 December 2019 07: 57
    The program guide of Channel 1 has not changed for several years. One and the same and the same. Only political SHOWs increased
  9. AML
    0
    11 December 2019 08: 23
    appeal of the then President of the Russian Federation Boris Yeltsin with his famous “I’m tired. I'm leaving"


    The Mundella effect. Many, including myself, remember that these words were spoken, but in reality it was just - "I'm leaving"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psgmqxF2-wU
  10. 0
    11 December 2019 08: 32
    On Ren TV news is more truth and current always, unlike the First.
    1. +4
      11 December 2019 08: 42
      On REN TV news from the category: alien masons under the Bandera flag staged a flood in the EU, and so inundated with Syrian refugees from the US military.
      1. Fat
        0
        11 December 2019 12: 06
        Quote: sot
        On REN TV news from the category: alien masons under the Bandera flag staged a flood in the EU, and so inundated with Syrian refugees from the US military.

        At least REN doesn’t lie about the fact that he doesn’t lie.))) You want to believe it, you want to not, You know what you are watching. And the news REN from Iz (Izvestia) is pretty high quality.
    2. +1
      11 December 2019 08: 56
      That's where the darkness is.
    3. +1
      11 December 2019 12: 48
      Quote: Pessimist22
      Ren TV news has more truth

      It is established that reptilians arrived from the planet Nibiru ...
      Quote: Pessimist22
      and always relevant

      The Mayan calendar with the end of the world did not come true, and now scientists have opened the Aztec calendar with a new end of the world.
      1. -1
        11 December 2019 13: 02
        Dear, REN TV crap, this is one thing, and NEWS, this is completely different, look and draw conclusions for yourself.
  11. +1
    11 December 2019 08: 32
    The first channel has not been the first. And attempts to regain former popularity are futile. Sedimentation tank!
  12. +1
    11 December 2019 08: 44
    For more than 10 years there has been no television in my house. Happiness!
  13. BAI
    +5
    11 December 2019 08: 51
    I have a negative attitude towards Ernst, but in this case we have a compilation of phrases pulled out of context, according to our point of view. At VO and individual authors are doing this.
  14. +2
    11 December 2019 08: 55
    For some reason, over the past 5 years, I have never had a desire to turn on 1 channel.
  15. 0
    11 December 2019 08: 58
    Now themed channels are in the trend, and not such garbage dumps as the first, Russia, NTV and other slag.
  16. +7
    11 December 2019 09: 09
    I'm just curious how some try to find a black cat in a dark room ...
    Ernst cannot be a statesman a priori, as he is the Director General of Channel One. We do not have state channels in Russia (unless OTR is called that).
    Ernst is most likely a fairly successful CEO since he has been in office for 20 years. And its success can be assessed by channel employees who work there, who receive a salary.
    As for the lack of exciting programs on any channel, it all depends on the owner.
    No need to try to fix something in the broadcasting grid - this is not in our power. You just need to stop watching everything, especially the debate of politicians, especially from outside, who work out their money.
    I will not even say with a probability of 100% that the channel does not use the effect of 25 frames. You look at others - you are simply amazed at how a person can be zombified by a TV box.
    hi
  17. +1
    11 December 2019 09: 37
    The most interesting thing that is on Channel One is the broadcasts about the stars of Soviet cinema. They don’t let you forget, plus you learn interesting facts from the life of your favorite artists. And actually the screenings of Soviet films. The rest is slag. And from the political programs and the choir of the court Aces, I want to throw something heavy on the screen.
    1. -1
      11 December 2019 11: 36
      Better watch the channel "History" There are programs about stars, and not necessarily from the world of art - about scientists, politicians, military leaders, much more than ORT.
      1. +2
        11 December 2019 16: 27
        This is clear. I just love Soviet films.
        1. -1
          11 December 2019 16: 32
          "Nostalgie" "Our Kino" "Red Line" is a classic of Soviet cinema.
  18. +2
    11 December 2019 09: 38
    interestingly, at least one person exists - who will say that he believes the news on ort? wassat
    1. +2
      11 December 2019 10: 00
      Quote: nikolai.kolya
      interestingly, at least one person exists - who will say that he believes the news on ort? wassat

      I believe. This is whose reality. It is broadcast specifically for this audience. Another thing is that this is not a reality in life. However passed)
  19. +1
    11 December 2019 10: 19
    "as the main channel of the country was" ripped "from the hands of Berezovsky" - and it seems that he remained so.
    Yesterday, at first, they talked about the homeless woman on a talk show for an hour (apparently she corresponds to them in terms of development), then in the news, the posner splashed the audience with his thoughts.
  20. +2
    11 December 2019 10: 32
    No one has done so much to undermine power as the first channel.
    The dullness of propaganda about the need to change time zones, retirement age, complete silence in the centenary of the revolution, provocative shows and so on and so forth.
    If the producer in the credits of the film is Ernst, then cranberries and sucks are provided, you can not watch.
    And why would the bourgeoisie praise our tv?
  21. 0
    11 December 2019 10: 54
    I watch TV 2 weeks every 2 years when I come to visit my father. Last time in December 2017, there was a complete feeling that I was watching some kind of opposition Ukrainian channel. 95% of the broadcast news from Ukraine - what happened there, what laws were adopted, who said / showed what. And on each issue in endless shows, speeches / opinions of politicians, experts, analysts, presenters and generally it is not clear who. I confess that the last time I could not fully watch it for 2 weeks, I broke down at the "International sawmill" with Keosayan, and mentally spitting towards the TV and swearing in a whisper, ran into another room. Home Internet and Smart TV.
  22. +4
    11 December 2019 11: 55
    Ernst is a great example of how everything touched by Putin's "vertical" turns into shit and gets corrupted. A truly talented leader and creative person, Ernst brought the first channel to a very high level at the beginning of the XNUMXs, all the others were several steps lower. But then, the state money became more and more, politics completely supplanted creativity and journalism, and the channel turned into the UG that it is now, with the same Ernst.
  23. +1
    11 December 2019 12: 07
    Yes, we have long known that the Russian media can not be trusted, however, like the Western ones.
  24. +1
    11 December 2019 13: 04
    "Yes, we are people, we made a mistake, but not on purpose."

    - What are you saying? smile
  25. 0
    11 December 2019 13: 52
    I was pricked by the translation of an article from this magazine on what the whole article was worth — someone somewhere once with someone about someone and probably it’s Ernst. And so on and so forth with all the twists and turns on the topic, I don’t know for sure that I’ll assume that I myself will believe and will tell the whole world. And then the domino chain reaction usually begins, when they begin to develop this topic in the mass of publications, according to the same scheme but on a larger scale. As a result, situations are born like with a test tube and the defeat of Iraq and Libya, born of an overclocked fake at obscure sources, but publicized and supported by the public because everyone talks about it everywhere. And the source itself is forgotten already in the morning after the first article. Well, where doesn’t it smell like without a beloved western skate and we will keep silent about it (could it be about the actions of our government and the media regarding frank and caught by the hand fake news will be remembered) but no , then that we are not profitable about that ignore.