US sent to the coast of Syria AUG led by aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman

The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman, at the head of the U.S. Navy carrier group, entered the Mediterranean Sea on Thursday, passing the Strait of Gibraltar, follows from the data of the AIS international vessel monitoring system.

The USS Harry Truman carrier group (AUG) includes a missile cruiser, several destroyers and a sixth Tomahawk cruise missile nuclear submarine fleet The United States Navy, whose area of ​​responsibility is, among other things, the Mediterranean Sea. According to reports, the carrier with escort ships will be off the coast of Syria for some time with uncertain tasks, after which it will go to the Persian Gulf, where it will be replaced by the USS Abraham Lincoln, which, due to the unfavorable situation with the state of the US carrier fleet, is in the Middle East longer than planned term.

According to the plans of the U.S. Navy, the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier was supposed to replace the USS Abraham Lincoln in early October, however, due to serious malfunctions in the power supply network, the transfer to combat duty was postponed.

It should be noted that for the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier, the Mediterranean can be considered almost the main place of deployment. The aircraft carrier, at the head of its AUG, repeatedly visited the Mediterranean Sea, was there and took part in Operation "Unshakable Determination" against terrorists from the Islamic State banned in Russia.

As previously reported by the US Navy command, amid the aggravation between the US and Iran, USS Abraham Lincoln at the head of the strike group, 19 of October this year first entered the Persian Gulf, passing through the Strait of Hormuz. Before that, he cruised for six months in the neighboring Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.

Comments

[cniza]

According to reports, the aircraft carrier with escort ships will be located off the coast of Syria for some time.

Intensify tension.

[NEXUS]

Quote: cniza

Intensify tension.

Assad's ass will be kissed and rolled back. Another thing is interesting ... here are mattresses on every corner screaming about US national security. And always I have a question - what side is happening on the BV or in Africa or Eurasia to the national security of these cephalopods? And what is most interesting is that the majority of the mattress inhabitant, for the most part, approves this all. And if they get somewhere by the cabbage soup, then they cry right away with the words, and then what are we for?

[Flooding]

Quote: NEXUS

And always I have a question - what side is happening on the BV or in Africa or Eurasia to the national security of these cephalopods?

If they were cephalopods, they would not become a superpower.
The current US security concept is built on global control and influence.
They are absolutely sincerely confident in their right to intervene in the affairs of any state.

[CAT BAIYUN]

If they were cephalopods, they would not become a superpower.

Well, as for superpower, I would like to note that DEBT is its important component. Well, imagine for yourself - an external debt of 22 trillion. and he is only growing. Something I have no doubt that some Madagascar, if he had borrowed such an amount, the same would have every chance of becoming a superpower .... But they are not going to repay these exceptional debts. interest is paid only by paper. And all that saves them at the moment is the regular payment of allegedly interest on bonds, which (interest I mean) are another cut paper.
There are no words - a powerful power .... But here for a long time they have not believed in their viability.

[raw174]

Quote: KOT BYUN

And all that saves them at the moment is the regular payment of supposedly interest on bonds

The American economy rests primarily on the control of global financial flows, through, inter alia, military power. All the talk that China is about to pressurize the United States is just idle talk. While the dollar is valuable in the global world, the United States will be at the helm, and there are no prerequisites for the change of these trends in the foreseeable future ...

[Pecheneg]

As history shows, sooner or later, any empire comes to an end. I hope in my life I still have time to see the collapse of the United States.

[Air force]

In general, there are already a lot of prerequisites, the rejection of the dollar is ongoing, but it is, this is a trend, the sanction dictatorship contributes to this. They cannot refuse the dollar overnight, it is not profitable to anyone, there is a gradual descent of the hegemon to the earth, 23 trillion of debt are also making themselves felt, and these are fairy tales that for the United States this debt is an empty phrase. Plus, there is an increase in other players, Russia, China, India and beyond, or do you think the United States has nothing to do on two fronts and started a battle while the economy is on? If everything was in chocolate, why would they need extra body movements. Remember 25 years ago, you would have thought that Russia would go on the counter from the United States. Yes, just imagine the headlines of the newspapers of that time and shift the current situation. For example, in 1996 the headlines were full of: Russia returned Crimea, imposed counter sanctions against European countries, 1998 Russia entered Syria and helped free 96% of the territory from terrorists supported by Western countries, 2000, contrary to the will of the United States, China India and even Turkey purchase S400 and so on , 2002 Russia interferes in the US elections, elects a president and promotes Britain's exit from the European Union, etc. The headlines at the time were different. Not to see what is happening and not to compare, can only one who does not want to do this. The world is changing, but not as fast as many want, but inevitably changing as few want, in particular the United States.

[CAT BAIYUN]

Can not immediately abandon the dollar is not profitable to anyone

And not just not profitable. Extremely dangerous.
If the "evergreen" falls sharply, it will not seem a little to everyone.
They must be landed gradually. There are all prerequisites for this.

[Flooding]

Quote: KOT BYUN

There are no words - a powerful power .... But here for a long time they have not believed in their viability.

The word "solvency" has a much broader meaning than "solvency".
This primarily implies the capabilities of the state. And they are great in the USA.
Yes, and so far he pays his bills regularly.
Do not simplify the situation.
There was a time when it was impossible to imagine that paper money replaced the means of payment from precious metals.
Then the situation seemed incredible that an unsecured banknote might have circulated.
20 years ago, you would laugh with an idiot dreaming about cryptocurrency.
The world is very dynamic. And modern views on finance are not standing still.

[Kirill Dou]

And they are not going to repay these exceptional debts. interest is paid only by paper.

- So the US lenders themselves do not seek to take these debts? Why, if the debtor pays his debts regularly and it brings much more income than simply repaying the debt?

But their viability has not been believed for a long time.

- but their creditors are trusted.

[Berber]

You are all correct. I just would like to add - the fall of the hegemon is inevitable. Moreover, the effect of the fall will be very impressive. I’m not even afraid to make a forecast - this will happen in the next 2-3 years.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Flood

If they were cephalopods, they would not become a superpower.

They were a superpower before they became cephalopods. Now they simply move by inertia without noticing that they have been predicted in all respects.

[Flooding]

Quote: Nyrobsky

Now they simply move by inertia without noticing that they have been predicted in all respects.

Remember, if age allows, how long the USSR rolled to the 90th by inertia.
This did not prevent him from remaining a superpower.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Flood

Quote: Nyrobsky

Now they simply move by inertia without noticing that they have been predicted in all respects.

Remember, if age allows, how long the USSR rolled to the 90th by inertia.
This did not prevent him from remaining a superpower.

Bad example. As a result of the loss of speed and the damping of the inertia movement of the USSR, it came down. So the US will roll. They have all the prerequisites for it, corresponding to the late USSR. One of the main ones is the progressive degradation of the ruling elite.
PS- As for memory in relation to age, I was born exactly 20 years after the victorious 1945, so I have some idea of ​​how it was and how it became without relying on modern "sources".

[Flooding]

Quote: Nyrobsky

Bad example. As a result of the loss of speed and the damping of the inertia movement of the USSR, it came down.

Stop. An unsuccessful example why?
It is absolutely applicable to the situation and perfectly illustrates your wrong.
Is it unsuccessful because "The US will roll"?
Well, I did not say the opposite.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Flood

Stop. An unsuccessful example why?
It is absolutely applicable to the situation and perfectly illustrates your wrong.
Is it unsuccessful because "The US will roll"?

No, because inertial motion cannot last forever. The United States is now living on the "best practices" of previous generations and presidents. After the collapse of the USSR, remaining the only superpower, the United States stupidly squandered all its advantages, turning from a superpower into an ordinary scarecrow, rapidly losing its authority. The world is changing. Economic leadership is steadily shifting in favor of the Asia-Pacific region. Maintaining military dominance is becoming more difficult, and in some areas even questionable. Actions of intimidation against the "disobedient" are demonstrative and declarative in nature, without achieving a positive result. An example of this is S. Korea and Iran. The policy of restraining the development of competitors through the sanctions and embargo regime has led to the fact that only Americans believe in the "free market" and pushes the rest of the world to leave the mattress care and search for a different economic model and a different center of power. The United States with its own hands pulled out all those "braces" that held the unipolar world and international law, and therefore, continuing to operate in the regime of "unreasonable dominance", they will certainly come to self-isolation and the loss of their dominant position. The process is natural and irreversible. To put it more succinctly, everything fits into the saying - "The dog barks, and the caravan goes", where the dog is the USA, and the caravan is the rest of the world.

[Flooding]

Quote: Nyrobsky

No, because inertia cannot last forever

Perhaps it’s easier for you to go up the branch and read what I wrote?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Flood

Quote: Nyrobsky

No, because inertia cannot last forever

Perhaps it’s easier for you to go up the branch and read what I wrote?

Are you a shuttle runner? Well here is your comment

Remember, if age allows, how long the USSR rolled to the 90th by inertia.
This did not prevent him from remaining a superpower.

To which a completely comprehensive answer follows - That in the end the USSR has come. There is no Union as a superpower since 1991. What's wrong? And the United States will roll, because they are also moving by inertia. And there are prerequisites for the United States.

[Flooding]

Quote: Nyrobsky

They were a superpower before they became cephalopods.

Now do you understand what I was discussing with you?
The United States remains a superpower in the generally accepted sense of the word.
How you make sense of this concept is a personal matter.

[voyaka uh]

"One of the main ones is the progressive degradation of the ruling elite." ////
----
Who do you mean? Trump, Clinton, Obama, Bush?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: voyaka uh

"One of the main ones is the progressive degradation of the ruling elite." ////
----
Who do you mean? Trump, Clinton, Obama, Bush?

Theirs too, but they are, nevertheless, just "managers" hired by those who stand behind them and represent their interests. Look at Senators and Congressmen from any camp - Democrats or Republicans - representing the US political elite. The bulk of + - 70 years, seasoned in the confrontation with the USSR and using all the same patterns in relations with Russia that took place before 1991. If then this was explained by the presence of opposing ideologies, now this factor is absent in relations. The globalists, in order to achieve complete domination, have two steps left - Russia and China, the scrapping of which will allow without much hassle to smash into dust some irritating factors such as the DPRK and Iran, after which the United States will have no restrictions on the conduct of a cannibalistic policy, one of the goals of which is to reduce population of the planet. What is the essence of the degradation of US politicians? The bottom line is that these rotten stumps have a survival reserve of 5-10-15 years and are blinded by hatred of Russia so much that in an effort to destroy it, they lose the instinct of self-preservation and push the world closer and closer to war, in which the period of their survival will be greatly reduced , and the existence of the United States as a state will be called into question. But the devil is with them, they will die, and okay, but the innocent people feel sorry for them.

[voyaka uh]

"hired by those behind them" ////
----
Who is behind them? Who hired Trump, even became interesting?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: voyaka uh

"hired by those behind them" ////
----
Who is behind them? Who hired Trump, even became interesting?

The Rockefeller families, Dupont, Morgan, and some other group of financiers, bankers, and industrialists. It’s a long time to paint, but if it’s interesting, you can briefly read it here ....
https://balalaika24.ru/politics/kto-upravlyaet-ssha-kratkiy-likbez

[voyaka uh]

AND! "Masters of the World". Alexander Samsonov and the user "Tatiana" know about them
even more than they know about themselves.
Why would these super-wealthy families with their trillions
to cover the US public debt? They don’t even get poorer, but the world of capitalism
(their own nest) - they will save.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: voyaka uh

Why would these super-wealthy families with their trillions
to cover the US public debt? They don’t even get poorer, but the world of capitalism
(their own nest) - they will save.

Are you sure that they want to save him by paying off the US government debt? The dollar system will be replaced by another measure, and debts ... will simply be forgiven. This debt is impossible to recover and repay, since there is not so much product that would provide this mass. If everyone gets what the United States owes, then the price of potato will be a million per kilogram.

[voyaka uh]

Yes, okay, I was joking.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: voyaka uh

Yes, okay, I was joking.

Received

[boss]

from what the United States will "sink" from your reasoning ?!
then the chances are zero point, even less than a tenth.
The US economy is strong, technologically ahead of the rest.
the army, considering NATO, as close, are overwhelmingly strong.
the hegemon with all the consequences, in addition, as your opponent correctly pointed out above, controls both the straits and strategic trade routes of the world
and most importantly: not the fact that the task of the Russian Federation and victory is to destroy, destroy the United States.
we should not destroy, but integrate into the existing world system, preferably with maximum benefits for the PEOPLE OF RUSSIA, and 'the whole world to dust', let's leave it to the most extreme case.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: patron

and most importantly: not the fact that the task of the Russian Federation and victory is to destroy, destroy the United States.

We do not have such a goal. The United States can handle this.

Quote: patron

we should not destroy, but be integrated into the existing world system, preferably with maximum benefits for the PEOPLE OF RUSSIA

Built in already. Immediately after 1991, they threw on themselves the noose of Russian-American "friendship". True, we did not get mutual benefit from this, but we did not suffer losses and do not bear any measure.

[WIKI]

Quote: Nyrobsky

They have all the prerequisites for it, corresponding to the late USSR. One of the main ones is the progressive degradation of the ruling elite.

The advantage of the US elite over the USSR is that it is not one. They are in constant rivalry, which creates healthy competition, which I also wish for.

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: WIKI

They are in constant rivalry, which creates healthy competition, which I also wish for.

Healthy? Pouring each other on a tub of shit a day and pulling dirty laundry from the closets do you think is good form? These two camps will soon lead to a civil war in the United States itself. No wonder at one time Obama bought a couple of million plastic double coffins. Apparently he was preparing to resolve disagreements with his political opponents a little earlier, but for some reason it did not grow together.

[WIKI]

Quote: Nyrobsky

Pouring each other on a tub of shit a day and pulling dirty laundry from the closets do you think is good form?

I think it’s good form not to do bad things. Tell me at least one ideal politician, and I completely agree with you?

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: WIKI

Quote: Nyrobsky

Pouring each other on a tub of shit a day and pulling dirty laundry from the closets do you think is good form?

I think it’s good form not to do bad things. Tell me at least one ideal politician, and I completely agree with you?

Alas, there are no such people in politics. We arrived at the situation as in a joke;
Archers of the dragon caught and dragged him to the king. He asks, bewildered, - What is the need to feed this beast? They are happy to answer - He de, the king only eats virgins! To which the king answers them with a sigh - It is necessary to release the beast, he will die with us.

[Babermetis]

Quote: Flood

Quote: NEXUS

And always I have a question - what side is happening on the BV or in Africa or Eurasia to the national security of these cephalopods?

If they were cephalopods, they would not become a superpower.
The current US security concept is built on global control and influence.
They are absolutely sincerely confident in their right to intervene in the affairs of any state.

Not at all like that. They recognized the fact that it was impossible to control all processes 10 years ago. They systematically leave and return only where it is profitable and in line with interests.

[vlad.svargin]

Flooding
If they were cephalopods, they would not become a superpower.

All their strength is the ability to print greenery with impunity, which gives the right to live at the expense of others. Perhaps hardly anyone will recall the military victories with a serious adversary, and only these pieces of paper create the myth of a military superpower. Even the DPRK proved this not only in 1959, but now (even they can fight with the Papuans as long as they don’t have a serious weapon, but otherwise they will not dare ...)

[hrych]

The article is loud .... they say to the shores of Syria, but in fact it’s going to change a colleague who is tired on a shift at the world gas station. The average American is certainly right that he supports, without this, he is an average citizen, he will live poorly, consume less, will not be able to pay loans and taxes, if he does not rob third countries.

[CAT BAIYUN]

The average American is certainly right that he supports,

Is it right - this is the question. But the layman has no way out. You can believe it, you can not believe it, you can support it or not support it, but where does an ordinary layman go? Especially want to eat always and preferably well.

[pru-pavel]

Quote: NEXUS

And always I have a question - what side is happening on the BV or in Africa or Eurasia to the national security of these cephalopods?

Well, the president of the Russian Federation also motivated the need to introduce the Russian military contingent to Syria, primarily, as it were, with the security of the Russian Federation itself. Of course America is farther from Syria than Russia. But Russia is also not so close. If one draws our ears to the fact that the United States has obligations to Europe-NATO in the field of security that is no less close to Syria than Russia, then in principle everything can be quite logically justified. So, if desired, both parties justify their presence there in approximately the same way, although they pursue completely different tasks.

[NEXUS]

Quote: pru-pavel

Well, the President of the Russian Federation also motivated the need to introduce the Russian military contingent to Syria, first of all, as if by the security of the Russian Federation itself.

Firstly, Assad called us there, so we are absolutely legally there, unlike the United States, and ... Secondly, the entry of our troops into Syria is justified, since if we hadn’t entered our Caucasus several years later , but we don’t need it. This is national security. And thirdly, dear, and who finances Al Qaeda and Ishil, do not remind?

[pru-pavel]

Well, in principle, the expected answer from the series, we have scouts, and they have spies. I don’t like to breed politota.

[Wolf]

Could there be a difference in this, that the events in Syria were a direct and direct military threat to Russia? If they managed to remove Assad and ruin Siri, the plan was to attack Iran, and then make a huge ISIS army that was bi right in the stomach of Rosiye and without a doubt would start a mess in the Caucasus. At this time, the United States, the evil British, France and Germany, through the media and liberals, would talk about protecting the human rights of the unbridled ISIS thugs, etc. So the events in Syria were a direct and direct military threat to Russia, but not for the USA! This is the difference!

[Wolf]

And then the time would come where the layman Rosie would start a fight for physical life. So far, Russia has bi fought with the BIG ARMY ISIS THE HEADLIGHTERS and Europe and the USA would have watched and made money peacefully! This is an old scissor strategy for the Orthodox Slavs yet another somewhere around the 11-12th century. So destroyed the Serbian kingdom. From the west, the Catholic army of the Ugrians and Krstash from the east of Ottoman Islam attacked! Such a fate was planned and Russia was attacked from the west by Tevtono Krstashi and from the southeast by Islamic enlighteners. BUT WAS IVAN THE GREAT (terrible) And he buried this scissor strategy and made the STATE GREAT RUSSIA! ;)

[Kirill Dou]

Secondly, the entry of our troops into Syria is justified, since if they had not been introduced, our Caucasus would have flared in a few years, but we don’t need it

- In the same way, the Americans justified the entry of troops into Afghanistan after September 11, and with the same (in addition to chemical weapons) they justified the military operation against Iraq in 2003.

"And thirdly, dear, who finances Al-Qaeda and Ishil do not remind?" - and who finances them?

[Kirill Dou]

"here are mattresses on every corner screeching about the US national security" - at one time the USSR "screeched" at every corner about the intrigues of the imperialists against world socialism, led by the USSR. And he sent troops or sent military support to Afghanistan, to African countries, to Cuba, to Czechoslovakia, to Vietnam, etc.

If a country expects to be a superpower, it must interfere in the affairs of other countries around the world. There is no "superpower" without this. And if Russia begins to do this, sending troops, say, to Venezuela - just like the American man in the street, you will support this with every fiber and gill of your soul.

[pru-pavel]

You are of course 100% right. But I think one way or another you will get the answer that everything is wrong, and that the USSR did good everywhere, I send my good scouts and great money and peaceful weapons to help everyone, and the United States only repairs evil, sending its vile spies everywhere, supplying everyone with its disgusting military equipment that brings death, and bloody dollars. What what, and propaganda in the USSR / Russia has always been at its best.

[maden.usmanow]

And always I have a question - what side is happening on the BV or in Africa or Eurasia to the national security of these cephalopods?

We are obligated to destroy the terrorists at distant approaches - Putin, about the special operation in Syria.

[Flooding]

An ordinary muscle game.
Against the background of not the most successful actions on the Syrian TVD, the move is predictable.
And the ships should not stand idle at the pier.
The admirals did not have to think long.

[cniza]

Well, yes, he will play and leave closer to Iran.

[bessmertniy]

It is possible that it will again warm up the situation around Syria. The approach to it, most likely, will not do without provocation.

[Romario_Argo]

the feeling that the USA AUG is again aimed at hitting the ATS, let's see how many Toporov this time will launch and how many will reach the targets

[cniza]

There is no doubt that they will slander.

[boss]

you are right, only here to place bets or "let's see how many axes will fly", there is no desire, the calculations can be made by specialists.

[pin_code]

exactly. In December, exercises of the Russian Navy, China and Iran will be held in the Gulf of Hormuz. it is likely that at this time the United States both AUGs will be kept in P
Yersidi Gulf

[1Alexey]

Quote: pin_code

In December, exercises of the Russian Navy, China and Iran will be held in the Gulf of Hormuz. it is likely that at this time the United States both AUGs will be kept in the Persian Gulf

Quite possibly. In addition, the ACG really needs to be replaced periodically (people get tired and the equipment may require repairs). Most likely, this is not directly related to Syria itself.

[Polite Moose]

Quote: cniza

Escalate tension

Yes, there is such tension that there is nowhere else to go. Closer than 100 m it is better not to approach the aircraft carrier, not to mention getting on board the ship. For

Before that, he cruised for six months in the neighboring Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea.

The crew cannot be allowed to land ashore. They now even have the beards of the barmalei - they will not be an obstacle.

[Alien From]

From changing the terms of the terms, the amount ........... changes !!!, only for mattress taxpayers, however)))

[venik]

Quote: cniza

Intensify tension.

=======
And most likely - just NEW TARGET!!

[TermNachTer]

As if, from such an injection, the pants are not cracked. Their aircraft carriers are "overloaded", which shortens the ship's service life. And with the replacement while straining.

[Yrec]

That would undermine him while passing the Suez Canal. The evening would immediately cease to be languid.

[Kirill Dou]

So why dream?) Well, blow it up!)

[The leader of the Redskins]

Such maneuvers can be a "plus" in the arguments of the supporters of the presence of the aircraft carrier in the fleet - they have moved and no Khmeinins or Camri is needed!

[vvvjak]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Such maneuvers can be a "plus" in the arguments of the supporters of the presence of the aircraft carrier in the fleet - they have moved and no Khmeinins or Camri is needed!

Arguments are "plus", and "grandmas" are "minus" ($ 1 million per day approximately).

[The leader of the Redskins]

And how much does the operation and logistics of supplying the ground base cost? This is if you do not count rents, as in Vietnam.

[vvvjak]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

And how much does the operation and logistics of supplying the ground base cost?

US $ 100 billion is spent annually on maintaining bases abroad.

[The leader of the Redskins]

Well, I apply to Russia. Education does not allow me to count other people's money) That's how much the same Khmeinim costs us, it would be interesting to know ...

[vvvjak]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

That's how much the same Khmeinim costs us, it would be interesting to know ...

Interesting, but no one will tell - a secret. You can estimate purely logically "on the fingers". If the United States spends (on average) $ 125 million per year on one base, then the Russian Federation is about $ 12,5 million * (theoretically). Those. about $ 34-35 thousand per day. Practically about $ 50 thousand should "drip".

[The leader of the Redskins]

Invalid calculation. Amerovsky base is mainly warehouses. Ours is an actively operating garrison, constantly consuming fuel, ammunition, bearing material and technical losses. I think many times more.

[vvvjak]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Invalid calculation.

This is not a calculation, but an assumption based on available information about the US Army, extrapolated to the Russian army.

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Amerovsky base is mainly warehouses. Ours is an actively operating garrison, constantly consuming fuel, ammunition, bearing material and technical losses. I think many times more.

You misunderstood me a little. I made an assumption about the cost of operating the base itself (as a complex of buildings and structures with people, mechanisms, etc.), by analogy with the US aircraft carrier. The operation of an aircraft wing (on an aircraft carrier) is another expense item and is not included in the cost of maintaining an aircraft carrier. An accurate financial calculation of the actions of the Russian army in Syria (the consumption of ammunition, fuel, the operational resource of equipment, losses, etc., etc.) will not be calculated even soon in the General Staff of the Russian Federation. But in any case, linking these costs to the maintenance of the base is not very correct.

[1Alexey]

Quote: Leader of the Redskins

Invalid calculation. Amerovsky base is mainly warehouses. Ours is an actively operating garrison, constantly consuming fuel, ammunition, bearing material and technical losses. I think many times more.

You are not quite right. Because we have a military operation in Syria combined with exercises and weapons tests! If there weren’t our military in Syria, we would have had to do more exercises and trials on the territory of the Russian Federation. That is, these resources would still be spent.

[knn54]

-with uncertain tasks.
AUG is not 14000, so Trump "didn't lie" ...
And the task for AUG ONE is "sea-shore".

[Paul Siebert]

The main task of aircraft carriers is to be sent somewhere.
No wonder they were built, spent billions of money, millions of man-hours.
Vaughn is a young and jumping Macron, and he sent his only floating nuclear airfield to the Syrian coast to defeat world terrorism.
He quickly defeated and a couple of weeks later came back under fanfare.
Yes, and we, by a sinful deed, drove the unfortunate "Kuznetsov" to the Mediterranean.
Did he help there?
Of course - it helped!
Would you manage without him?
Without any doubt.
The main thing here is the invaluable crew experience gained during the operation.
Nuclear-powered aircraft carriers will appear in the Russian navy. We need people who can say: "That's when we stood abeam of Tartus ..."
They will form the backbone of the future aircraft carrier fleet of Russia.

[Mikhalych]

US sent to the coast of Syria AUG led by aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman

Scary, but scary for ourselves.

[rocket757]

Aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln will be replaced, which, due to the unfavorable situation with the state of the US carrier fleet, is in the Middle East longer than planned.

This is logical and understandable. However, to take a walk, "scare", remind of yourself, this is a common practice for a bandit!

[rotmistr60]

"Oil protection" requires strengthening the group. But seriously, one aircraft carrier with a group of ships is replacing another, that is, an ordinary rotation.

[Maks1995]

And, how many such news has already been, and without continuing.
Felts came, felts did not come, toli in general didn’t translate something like that ...

[mehan]

For them, is a routine.
For Kuzi, is a feat ...

[gost2012]

Quote: patron

...
The US economy is strong, technologically ahead of the rest.

No already. Technologically, the US is no longer to come. That is why the fight against Huavei. And the lag in rocket technology from the Russian Federation has not yet been overcome in any segment, as much as some would not like to spit on the Russian Federation and its power.

the army, considering NATO, as close, are overwhelmingly strong.
...

no longer overwhelming. Still very strong, but not unconditionally and not overwhelmingly. Hence the turbulence in the world as well.

we must ... integrate into the existing world system ....

They were built into the European business, and considered themselves its integral part, trusting the EU. The blow was to the most sensitive place - short-term financing, it completely plunged into this market of the Russian Federation, considering itself a part, it turned out to be not a part. In fact, it was a sneaky kid, and it seemed that the Russian Federation could not withstand this blow. It turned out that the lessons of the Kremlin in 2008 were learned, the work on the mistakes made, and therefore survived.
Business will never be with Europe as before. And with the rest of the world they have just begun, but taking into account experience. Nobody will ever be built in and will not be anywhere, including this also applies to relations with China.

[Babermetis]

Quote: Max1995

And, how many such news has already been, and without continuing.
Felts came, felts did not come, toli in general didn’t translate something like that ...

And what should they be translated if not every day, most of the US Army units, on their own website, publicize the orders received and the deadlines, lead time?
That's when they stop glaring, then perhaps there will be a reason to be nervous.

[Starper-xnumx]

US sent to the coast of Syria AUG led by aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman

Well, what else is there to do? I would be on the site of Assad, Una with a friendly visit invited to Damascus .. I would exchange experience, etc.

[NF68]

New Year's "gifts" are being carried.

[Tank jacket]

If sent to Syria, then in other regions it is free. The hegemon is not the same. Jeans at the fifth point are torn ... It is heard how the weightlifter is torn ... Puffing with all his strength ... It remains only with a razor in the throat and in the well (s) There are fears that there the team is under dredges and the ship may tear ... Then minus one Admiral will retire. T will remove another objectionable.

[VLADIMIR VLADIVOSTOK]

They will say they will drown everyone. But. It. Do not need us or him .. Simple. Demonstrator of muscles.

[Ugolek]

As history shows, sooner or later, any empire comes to an end. I hope in my life I still have time to see the collapse of the United States.

Not only shows, but convincingly proves that the time of the existence of empires became less and less according to some incomprehensible law. Put the time of the existence of all the major empires on the chronological scale and make sure that their lifetime decreases. The life of the Soviet empire was 70 years. According to my hypothesis, the lifetime of the American empire will be less than 70, and the Chinese empire will not come true. Looks like the time of empires has passed. And we are witnessing the decay of the last empire - the United States. Please note that the EU is not an empire, but a kind of alliance. And how long it will last is unknown.

[Shelest2000]

.Atomic Navy Aircraft Carrier Enters Mediterranean Sea

Daggers with Caliber began happily preening in preparation for a date.