Military Review

At the international exercise "Rimpak" ships of the Pacific Fleet repelled the air attack of the Canadian Air Force

24
At the international exercise "Rimpak" ships of the Pacific Fleet repelled the air attack of the Canadian Air Force

In the operational square of the exercise, a detachment of Pacific warships fleet (OBK Pacific Fleet) was sent as part of a joint warrant with US naval ships, which received the name of the 170th operational formation. The American ships — the destroyer “Port Royal”, the patrol ship “Bertholph” and the frigate “Gary” —went parallel with the OBK Pacific Fleet.

While moving to a given point of connection, the combat fulfilled the combat maneuvering and reflection of the air attack of the conditional enemy. According to the plan of the exercises, an international detachment was attacked by the Canadian Air Force. F-18 aircraft made a massive raid in pairs and separate groups on the ships of the warrant. Distinguished Pacific gunners. They were among the first to find the air "enemy" and carried out its conditional destruction.

On the way to the area of ​​artillery firing, the ocean tug "Fotiy Krylov" took the Gary frigate into tow, conditionally losing its course. The rest of the ships conducted exercises under the code name "Leapfrog" with elements of joint maneuvering and overtaking each other. After that, two-hour synchronized artillery firing at a naval target was conducted.

In the next two days, the ships will replenish their stocks by wake and will continue exercises on disembarking inspection teams from helicopters.

The international Rimpak exercises are traditionally held at 23 once every two years, but the Russian ships participate in them for the first time. 45 ships and vessels of various classes, 100 airplanes are involved in these exercises, more than 20 thousand troops from 22 countries of the world take part.
Author:
24 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sakhalininsk
    Sakhalininsk 17 July 2012 14: 11
    +17
    Well done Pacific showed that there is gunpowder in the powder flasks and berries in the buttocks good
    1. kapitan_21
      kapitan_21 17 July 2012 14: 33
      +8
      I agree,
      and learned the tactics of the Canadian Air Force (NATO), which is very useful for our sailors! )))
      1. 11 black
        11 black 17 July 2012 16: 31
        +5
        it’s a good thing, but it’s a pity that they showed their tactics that it’s not good))
      2. Serb
        Serb 18 July 2012 07: 55
        +1
        Well, I think NATO did the same thing. It’s not for nothing that ours were there. So to speak, for a friendly little party, a little touch each other)
    2. paanvl
      paanvl 17 July 2012 15: 19
      +10
      And the poher in the bows =)
      1. Teploteh - nick
        Teploteh - nick 17 July 2012 16: 09
        +7
        Quote: Sakhalininets
        berries in the buttocks

        Quote: paanvl
        And poher in the pokers

        laughing laughing good
        ShturmKGB
        learn their tactics
        request
        Quote: paanvl
        learned the tactics of the Canadian Air Force
        request
        And what tactics can there be?
        There are goals - flying enemy planes attacking the ship, there are air defense systems, which at the same time each tracks and fires at several targets. Therefore, it does not matter at all how they fly there, one at a time, or 10 each, quickly or slowly. No tactics will help the aircraft if the enemy’s air defense missiles are pointed at and flying at it, all the more so since our air defense systems are not the best - but the best systems in the world! 2 anti-missiles, simultaneously attacking the target (and there are always 2 of them working on 1 target - in all air defense and missile defense systems) - 100% guaranteed to destroy any attacked target. And no infrared traps and maneuvers will help her.
        1. Lord of the Sith
          Lord of the Sith 17 July 2012 19: 46
          +1
          By the way, I was always interested in whether a plane could throw a rocket off its tail using IR traps and maneuver.
          1. with
            with 17 July 2012 20: 11
            0
            Quote: Sith Lord
            By the way, I was always interested in whether a plane could throw a rocket off its tail using IR traps and maneuver.

            From the "tail" he can, but he will get in the "hollow" !!))) bully bully bully
            1. with
              with 17 July 2012 20: 47
              0
              And let them try not to accept our rules !!)) bully
          2. Commodus
            Commodus 17 July 2012 20: 56
            +3
            Ik traps it is possible to divert a missile sobsno with ik guidance. A missile induced by a radio beam or a laser is no longer there. To do this, dipole reflectors are needed, and even interference and active maneuvering are used to evade missiles.
            It’s possible to get away from at least one.
    3. SSR
      SSR 17 July 2012 23: 16
      +3
      Quote: Sakhalininets
      Well done Pacific showed that there is gunpowder in the powder flasks and berries in the buttocks

      aaa bravo cool !!! urya ... and you are generally in a position to assume .. that the nato ships deliberately delayed the detection? that ours .. knew about it and also "played"
      forum really cheers partyiots ...
      Urya throws caps ...
      Quote: Sakhalininets
      I agree,
      and learned the tactics of the Canadian Air Force (NATO), which is very useful for our sailors! )))

      one more ... and who told you that they are so dumb to work out their real tactics .. and not the target tactics of recognizing our capabilities?
      okay .. I will not spoil the cheers mood ...
      PS.
      well really .. funny to read ... in general, the forum should be a place of collision of different views and opinions .. in which the cast-iron argument wins)))) and not the hard trolling)))
  2. ShturmKGB
    ShturmKGB 17 July 2012 14: 14
    -1
    There is a need to participate with "western partners", to learn their tactics, opportunities to drown them more successfully ... then ...
    1. patsantre
      patsantre 17 July 2012 21: 57
      +1
      they will learn our tactics and opportunities in the same way, no?
  3. vorobey
    vorobey 17 July 2012 14: 17
    +4
    The press service of the eastern military district informs that when repelling a conditional attack, not a single Canadian pilot was conditionally injured.

    It would be interesting to know the results of the shooting.
    1. Skiff
      Skiff 17 July 2012 15: 28
      +4
      Well, yes, and here is the answer about the state of our fleet, otherwise you can only hear that it is rusty and antediluvian.
      1. Captain3
        Captain3 17 July 2012 18: 57
        +1
        The main thing is people, and technology will not let you down!
  4. 5aa1
    5aa1 17 July 2012 14: 17
    +2
    teachings are good. all the more so massive. especially "Rimpak", where we are for the first time. keep it up!
  5. Oleg Rosskiyy
    Oleg Rosskiyy 17 July 2012 14: 23
    +13
    Pacific commandos distinguished themselves. They were among the first to find an air "enemy" and carry out its conditional destruction, while NATO determined the time and algorithm of the response of the Russian fleet to detect and repel threats from the air.
    1. urzul
      urzul 17 July 2012 14: 29
      +6
      Correctly defined and thought about their behavior.
  6. Volkh
    Volkh 17 July 2012 14: 34
    0
    Quote: Sakhalininets

    Sakhalin (1) Today, 14:11 ↓ new

    Well done Pacific showed that there is gunpowder in the powder flasks and berries in the buttocks


    I will add to your words that this, as in the article, is conditional.
    so far conditionally.
  7. understudy
    understudy 17 July 2012 14: 39
    0
    There is no reason not to be happy for our sailors. But ... again this is a significant "but", why did they keep silent about the results of the artillery fire? But "were carried out two hours synchronous artillery firing at a naval target. "Or are there no hits during synchronized shooting?
  8. anchonsha
    anchonsha 17 July 2012 14: 50
    0
    Guys, sailors of Pacific Fleet, keep it up and all subsequent exercises !!!
  9. gispanec
    gispanec 17 July 2012 17: 51
    +5
    In addition, I’ll write that in addition to perfectly reflected air attacks ...... our BOD, the only one, shot perfectly at)) of the main caliber for a simulated surface target (it floated something like a buoy-barrel, a range of about 20 km ... about)). Our gunners turned out to be better than our NATA partners)) ... and more precisely, the smaller number of shells was expended by us ... something like that .... one word well done !!!! Respect and respect!
  10. Alx1miK
    Alx1miK 17 July 2012 19: 26
    0
    "Canadian Air Force"? I don’t know those. I know Soviet, Russian, and what are these clowns? :)
  11. oldmen1973
    oldmen1973 17 July 2012 19: 57
    0
    The good news is positive! Well done guys did not shame the St. Andrew's flag! Keep it up!
  12. Victor
    Victor 17 July 2012 20: 11
    +2
    An interesting assessment of the design of our BOD was made by the chief engineer of the US Navy base in Pearl Harbor. He noted with admiration "The stunning and insanely beautiful predatory design of the Russian BOD and lamented that American ships are like boxes."
    I personally watched "Zvezda" TV.
    1. kotdavin4i
      kotdavin4i 18 July 2012 08: 18
      0
      Good morning Victor, there was an interesting program from the series "Wings of the Motherland", something about the fleet. It was there that just told about the post-war program of building ships of the USA and the USSR. The Americans preferred the comfort of the crew, installed not so many weapons, made the compartments and cockpits more spacious and comfortable for the long-term residence of the crew, increasing the number of ships in the group, they achieved the same firepower as a smaller number of Soviet ships - which were "sharpened" for combat action, with maximum weapons on board.
  13. Eugene
    Eugene 17 July 2012 22: 16
    0
    I apologize, but how do you determine conditionally the goal is defeated in the exercises or not? Well, it’s clear that the pilot knows that a missile was aimed at him. What next?
    1. gispanec
      gispanec 17 July 2012 22: 32
      0
      In our case, the artillery fired ... the fact of the defeat was filmed.
      And in the case of airplanes, if conditional 2 missiles are launched, then there is no chance .... more precisely, there is but 1 out of 100.
      A strange question ... and the Ministry of Emergencies conditionally seriously injured in the mountains, conditionally lowered, operated and saved ..... and how it is determined .... like the general mayor and student questions .... not serving ....
  14. suharev-52
    suharev-52 17 July 2012 22: 34
    +1
    Well done guys, did not drop the honor of Russia. They once again proved to the imperialists that if something is then everything. Sincerely.
  15. Nick
    Nick 17 July 2012 22: 35
    +1
    More exercises! Good and different! Keep it up!
  16. Dimitr
    Dimitr 18 July 2012 06: 54
    -1
    It’s great that practical training has become increasingly common! And it’s likely that they began to invite us more and more often to various international events, shows something!