The Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy announced which ships will replenish the fleet before the end of the year

The Russian fleet by the end of this year will replenish with five new ships. This was stated by Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy Admiral Nikolai Evmenov at a meeting of the Military Council of the Navy, the press service of the Naval fleet.

Speaking at the meeting, the Commander-in-Chief of the Navy announced that during December 2019, the Navy will include: frigate of the 22350 project “Admiral of the Fleet Kasatonov”, corvette of the 20385 project “Thundering”, small missile ship (RTO) of the 21631 project (Buyan-M) “Ingushetia” ", the mine defense ship (sea minesweeper) of the 12700 project" Vladimir Emelyanov ", the medium sea tanker of the 23130 project" Academic Pashin ", as well as other support vessels.

In addition, the repair of the Vepr nuclear submarine of the 971 project Schuka-B, the large landing ship Olenegorsky Miner and the hydrographic ship Romuald Muklevich is nearing completion.

In the field of ship repair and modernization, the repair of the Vepr nuclear submarine, the large landing ship Olenegorsky Miner and the hydrographic ship Romuald Muklevich is being completed. The program of repair and modernization of large anti-submarine ships will continue

- declared Evmenov.

Note that the K-157 Vepr multipurpose nuclear submarine of the 971 Schuka-B project is currently listed as a reserve in connection with the depletion of the reactor core.

Comments

[Starper-xnumx]

Hurray to scream early, but work is going on and it is very pleasing! Thank you, shipbuilders, we in Russia hope for you that you will restore the Russian Navy, at least to the level of the USSR.!

[cost]

The Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy announced which ships will replenish the fleet before the end of the year

wonderful will be a gift to the country for the New Year. And in January we will ask Santa Claus for the same goodies.
And so that grandfather did not refuse - we will try to behave ourselves and not to say bad words. Really, Vitaliy?

[seregatara1969]

at the shipyards there are hulls almost ready without motors.

[Starper-xnumx]

Quote: Rich

And so that grandfather did not refuse - we will try to behave ourselves and not to say bad words. Really, Vitaliy?

True Dmitry, but I’m not responsible for myself after the New Year
Again, make me laugh? .. I remember here "talking" on the first of January .. Bolot clearly poked me ... an infection

Then it bore me to the stars ..

[Alexander Petrov1]

It’s impossible to reach the level of the USSR, because the USSR spent 10 times more on the fleet than Russia now and our capacities are not enough, and even with such breakdowns in the deadlines for ships, you can certainly speed up much, but you have to order 120 years ago under the Russian Empire in overseas shipyards like China or India, because as before under the Emperor, neither Britain nor the United States will be built for us.

[Chaldon48]

It turns out that it remains to state that the Russian fleet is more likely alive than dead.

[Gromozeka]

The Russian Navy is slowly being reborn. I would like faster and replenishment of ships of large displacement of the distant sea zone.

[Astra wild]

Of course everyone wants a lot at once, but this does not happen. Thank you for starting to replenish

[Victor_B]

Alas, all this is a drop in the ocean.
In the full sense of the word ...
The construction and operation of the navy is very expensive and not quick.

[Victor_B]

Here I am sometimes surprised minus out of the blue.
(I understand without any problems who put me more than 50 minuses the other day in the thread about the "Iron Dome")
What is wrong in the expression?

Quote: Victor_B

Alas, all this is a drop in the ocean.

Indeed, it’s not enough!
And these are not some of my Wishlist about the mighty ocean carrier fleet.
Today, Russia is investing in a nuclear and diesel submarine fleet.
I think this is correct.
Do you need surface ships? Of course !!!
But what and in what quantity? This is a matter of the Military Doctrine of the state.
Well, money, of course.
I am not one of those who "give money to pioneers and pensioners" (although as a stump-seigneur not against), enemies will not pay me a pension.

[orionvitt]

Quote: Victor_B

more than 50 minuses

Someone may have got excited, but I noticed that a whole brigade is hanging out here, most likely from a "neighboring country". With the sole purpose of screwing up, though cons. And minus everyone. How many times have I noticed. I read the forum, then it was updated and here is the phenomenon, EVERYONE has exactly minus 1.

[Victor_B]

Quote: orionvitt

but I noticed that a whole brigade is hanging out here, most likely from a "neighboring country". With the sole purpose of screwing up, at least cons. And minus everyone. How many times have I noticed. I read the forum, then it was updated and here is the phenomenon, EVERYONE has exactly minus 1.

That's right!
And just out of the blue!
In general, a neutral, non-debatable and not offensive comment for anyone.
And on the "Jewish" line ... There are always dozens of minuses.
CHSH even on the "Ukrainian" branch can be much less.

[Overlock]

Quote: orionvitt

here a whole brigade hangs up, most likely from a "neighboring country".

Yes, and enough. After all, very often minus not for the content, but for the nickname

[Mountain shooter]

Well, replenishing ... Slowly. When the Zircons are put into service, even RTOs will become very "toothy" ... Russia has to give asymmetrical responses to modern challenges. Well, we do not have AUG and will not be in the next eleven years. This means that we need to make sure that the enemy quickly runs out of them!
In which case.

[Ratmir_Ryazan]

Russia is building up its navy. Shipbuilders and design bureaus are stuffing their hands, then everything will go faster.

Project 22350 handsome, project 22350M will be even better!

[Victor_B]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

Project 22350 handsome, project 22350M will be even better!

As for the aesthetics, or rather the design of a modern warship - it's debatable.
I will give sailing yachts as an example.
Earlier, with a sailing fleet, the area of ​​the sails and the ratio of length / width (length runs!) They were just handsome! Google Yacht America, it is simply a masterpiece of beauty and design of its time and the fastest yacht.
Then, in order to equalize the chances of the competition, handicap points were introduced.
The so-called IOR formula. (International Organization).
And there were yachts "pregnant oysters" who came to the finish line last, but became champions thanks to the handicap.
The modern appearance of the warship is in many ways a tribute to "stealth", how useful it is in life, no one checked.
But!
This is another beauty. New. Here in my opinion is not so beautiful.
But Soviet-built ships were always just beautiful!
The singing frigates of project 61 are simply a masterpiece of design!
Compared to US ships.

[mmaxx]

Yes, okay! IOR yachts are also beautiful. With very few exceptions. And the super-width of those times, for a long time is not breadth, but dinner. And IOR yachts fought their predecessors both on a score and without a score .. This is just one of the stages in the development of architecture. Like a stealth brace. Moreover, if the Americans have a desire to really hide everything inside, then our ships have exactly this zakos. Although beautiful, what can I say.

[Victor_B]

Quote: mmaxx

IOR yachts are also beautiful.

Quote: mmaxx

And the IOR yachts fought their predecessors with and without a point.

I am sure that the famous yacht "America" ​​will make even a modern single-hull yacht.
And if it has modern dacron sails and winches ...
And according to the handicap, it will always be at the end of the list.

[mmaxx]

Well, really ... It's a mid-19th century car. With all incoming and outgoing. Nobody says she's not great. Beautiful and good things will always remain so. But one and a half hundred years have passed. The racing boat is currently hitting 25-26 knots at an average daily speed. At a much smaller size. In such conditions, "America" ​​will simply fall apart. And it will not give so much under any circumstances.

[Overlock]

Quote: Victor_B

But Soviet-built ships were always just beautiful!

I really liked the Soviet ones. And today’s it’s not that at all .. I still remember my delight of power and beauty, greatness, when about 100 meters passed the anti-ship missile "Moskva".

[Grits]

Quote: Victor_B

The singing frigates of project 61 are simply a masterpiece of design!
Compared to US ships.

And I like the appearance of our BDKashki. Anyway, our ships are a design miracle compared to American freaks. Back in the 80s, when my friend was serving a conscript at TOP, he said that American ships were "made from an ax." I did not believe it (there was no such opportunity as it is now to look on the Internet). So he painted for me (not a bad artist). I was really surprised at the poor design of their ships.

[kupitman]

In principle, your post is a great example of the subjectivity of perception like / dislike. I mean, to each his own.
Outwardly, I like eagles, but there are no gadgets (1234). And here it does not depend on what year the ships were built.
For example, the Japanese Yamato (purely outwardly) is a model of beauty, but it is subjective.

[Sandor Clegane]

Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan

Project 22350 handsome, project 22350M will be even better!

I would like for the 22350M to start laying in the shipyards in a year ...., and the 22350 line was completed and distributed between the Black Sea Fleet and the Baltic Fleet.

[knn54]

Channel "Zvezda" voiced MORE than five Well, okay.
The question is one, according to the new. Old style or the eastern calendar ...

[parkello]

3 warships, 1 minesweeper and 1 tanker .. while that’s normal I hope they will continue to increase the pace of construction. God help the brothers ...

[Dmitry Sokolov]

Quote: Starper-777

at least to the level of the USSR.!

An impossible task, given the existing political and economic system in Russia!

[Klingon]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Well, replenishing ... Slowly. When the Zircons are put into service, even RTOs will become very "toothy" ... Russia has to give asymmetrical responses to modern challenges. Well, we do not have AUG and will not be in the next eleven years. This means that we need to make sure that the enemy quickly runs out of them!
In which case.

and that is true. it’s much cheaper and faster to rivet a new number of zircons than to build an AUG (and it’s long and expensive)

[fa2998]

Quote: Starper-777

at least to the level of the USSR.!

One gets the impression that Russia has signed some kind of treaty, such as the Washington one, to limit the displacement of surface ships. We are creating a coastal fleet.
To the level of the USSR, with ships of 10-20 thousand tons, as to Pluto.

[Seaflame]

Kasatonov is already a ship of the 2nd rank, not a coastal trifle!

[Astra wild]

"as of today it is listed in reserve" in this case, if the Admiral does not lie, and "Vepr" will return to service

[VohaAhov]

And where in this "victorious" list are "Prince Vladimir", "Kronstadt", "Pyotr Morgunov" and some support vessels - "Akademik Alexandrov", "Sergei Balk", "Vsevolod Bobrov", SB-742 and others?

[Piramidon]

Quote: VohaAhov

And where in this "victorious" list are "Prince Vladimir", "Kronstadt", "Pyotr Morgunov" and some support vessels - "Akademik Alexandrov", "Sergei Balk", "Vsevolod Bobrov", SB-742 and others?

Only those that are to be delivered before the end of this year are listed.

The Russian fleet by the end of this year will replenish with five new ships. This was stated by the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, Admiral Nikolai Evmenov

We are not talking about the rest.

[VohaAhov]

The ships and vessels I listed were promised to be delivered by the end of 2019. Some officials beat themselves in the chest so that it seemed that they would break all their ribs.

[Arthur 85]

These are 32 UVP cells. Good but not enough.

[Old Horseradish]

Excuse me, of course, but it's a shame. Banana Republic fleet, not a single large surface ship. This is despite the fact that we are the richest country in terms of resources. You can continue shouting "Urya!"

[Seaflame]

Listen, before saturating the Navy with cruisers and destroyers, you must first replenish the fleet with frigates, corvettes and minesweepers. And with this a serious shortage ...

[Old Horseradish]

Quote: Seaflame

you must first replenish the fleet with frigates, corvettes and minesweepers

... And also with boats, boats and rafts.
It is necessary to think a head, how many ships this year China entered? USA? Japan?

[Grits]

Quote: Old Fuck

You can continue shouting "Urya!"

I think in order to shout "Hurray!" or "Shame!" it is necessary to compare this indicator with other fleets of the world. That is, compare how many in the current year Russia has built (repaired) ships (type, class) and side by side in the plate is the same for the USA, China, Japan, and other countries. Then it will be clear what to shout about.

[Seaflame]

The necessary and relevant replenishment, I just want more, two frigates, three corvettes, half a dozen minesweepers ...

[mmaxx]

I’ll run into a bunch of minuses again. But.
Our Soviet ships are beautiful. But superstructures are some kind of heap of bridges, handrails, truss masts and other things. All this will be worn out to clean, paint, repair. If any ammunition arrives, it will tie everything up in a knot. And wash off the consequences of weapons of mass destruction? All of this is extremely impractical and difficult to build and repair. Try to carry out modernization on such beauty. I wonder what will remain of the Atlantis after modernization?
American ships in this sense are much more practical. Therefore, there is its own beauty. With us, when there is nothing to add, with them, when there is nothing to reduce.

[Samaks]

Increase the 20385 series by 20-25 units.