The military police of the Russian Federation spoke about the purpose of the transfer of helicopters to the former US base in Syria

19
The military police of the Russian Federation spoke about the purpose of the transfer of helicopters to the former US base in Syria

A senior inspector of the Russian military police told reporters that Russian troops entered the territory of a formerly abandoned US military airfield in northern Syria. We are talking about a military airfield near the city of Metras in the province of Aleppo. The airfield has a unpaved runway.

Previously, it was reported that an American military base was located on its territory. Through Metras was the supply of US troops in northern Syria. According to some reports, the supply also went through the same facility with respect to the French special forces operating in the northern part of the SAR. Recall that earlier Paris accused the US side of inconsistency of actions, which led to the fact that the military contingent of the French Armed Forces in the SAR was left without supplies. President Emmanuel Macron noted that the French special forces had to urgently be evacuated.



Russian military police say that through Metras, the Americans also delivered for the so-called "Syrian moderate opposition."

Today, Russian helicopters are located at this field airfield. The Russian military police spoke about the objectives of this kind of transfer.


From the report:

This was done in order to prevent the previous owners from damaging the runway, as they usually did in relation to other objects abandoned in Syria.

The facility is now under the protection of the Russian military police.

Indeed, earlier the Americans bombed the abandoned military facilities in the north of the SAR, noting that they were doing this in order to prevent other forces from taking advantage of the infrastructure.

Against this background, the statement of the first deputy representative of the Russian Federation to the United Nations Dmitry Polyansky is noteworthy. He called US action against Syrian oil a robbery.

From a statement by Polyansky to the United Nations:

Syria should be immediately freed from the illegal foreign military presence, even if such an important resource as our oil is at stake.

The diplomat noted that the return of deposits under the control of Syria would be a significant contribution by the United States to humanitarian assistance to the Syrian population.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    15 November 2019 06: 47
    A significant contribution to the treasury of assistance to the fraternal people of the Syrian Arab Republic. The support of Syrian Kurds for military patrolling by friends from the North is growing stronger and widening. The Turk and the Russian military policeman are a military fraternity. In Damascus, as in Baghdad - everything is calm.
    1. -6
      15 November 2019 08: 22
      The support of Syrian Kurds for military patrolling by friends from the North is growing stronger and widening.

      Rubber bullets and tear gas from Turkish liberators as humanitarian aid are already being distributed on the roads of Syria.
      Kurds (or not Kurds?) Clearly need some of them dumped onto the CNN camera. I re-propose that MO order rubber balloons for CORD
    2. +3
      15 November 2019 08: 22
      Such concepts as humanitarianism, assistance, peacekeeping and other peace-loving things are not included in the plans of the United States, and therefore do not have to rely on them. And the fact that ours was relocating aviation to this airfield was initially predictable, and in the end it happened.
      1. +3
        15 November 2019 08: 26
        Quote: Spartanez300
        Such concepts as humanitarianism, assistance, peacekeeping and other peace-loving things are not included in the US plans.

        They can only talk about it beautifully, masking their predatory plans.
  2. -1
    15 November 2019 06: 48
    I hope the American ghosts weren’t afraid that we arrived ...
  3. +3
    15 November 2019 06: 53
    He called US action against Syrian oil a robbery

    Ma-ro-dora!
  4. +4
    15 November 2019 07: 03
    Well, if you translate the article into Russian -
    1. The Americans fled, abandoning their allies.
    2. The French special forces escaped. Since France is not able to supply it.
    1. +5
      15 November 2019 07: 21
      So then the RF Armed Forces came and the gate was tightly brewed
      1. +2
        15 November 2019 07: 43
        The gate also needs to be kept. Ours will cope. Luck for this would be enough.
    2. +2
      15 November 2019 07: 30
      There were 8 training camps for the Kurds. When the Turks began the operation (with US consent), the French fled. Then the Yankees returned.
      - "monopoly" influence on the Kurds.
      -oil..
      and throw the Turks. and the French
    3. +1
      15 November 2019 11: 57
      Quote: Monar
      1. The Americans fled, abandoning their allies.
      2. The French special forces escaped. Since France is not able to supply it.

      The French are still those allies. They really wanted to get into Syria, but they could not do it on their own. Then they waited for the American forces to enter - and "fell on their tail." The Americans solved their problems, the French - theirs. And when the Americans decided to leave, the French became hysterical that the Americans were obliged to protect them, and instead abandoned them.
      In short, haberdashery and cardinal. smile
  5. -1
    15 November 2019 07: 52
    From a statement by Polyansky to the United Nations:
    Syria should be immediately freed from the illegal foreign military presence, even if such an important resource as our oil is at stake.
    Such statements must be made in the form of an ultimatum and reinforced with real force. And since Russia cannot enter into direct conflict with America / ... like America with Russia, by the way /, and Assad is too weak for this, the reaction will either be ignoring silence or another malicious snitch from the State Department.
    1. 0
      15 November 2019 08: 55
      Direct conflict? What for? Strength? Well, here's a real confirmation for you.
      The Americans actually betrayed their allies. In fact. I would also understand if the withdrawal of the Amer troops was agreed. And then ... That the Kurds, that the French in a pose.
      1. +2
        15 November 2019 09: 02
        The question is about oil fields. The Yankees are sitting on them and I don’t see the power to throw them out of there. Not alone, but with allied troops in light cars.
        And the French simply have nothing to do there, and Sarkozy is fanning all this "horror of betrayal" in order to simply strengthen his positions in France.
        1. 0
          15 November 2019 09: 43
          There is one. And for Syria, this is quite problematic. In relation to income.
          But there is one land mine that the Americans have laid down for themselves. Almost frank (well, there blah blah blah blamed) betrayal of the allies.
          I'm certainly not there, but here
          Allied units in light vehicles.
          will they not think? Personally, I would still very much think about the "American defense".
    2. 0
      15 November 2019 11: 00
      Quote: Thunderbolt
      Such statements need to be done in the form of an ultimatum and reinforce with real power

      From the statement of Polyansky at the united nations

      Did Polyansky need to enter the UN rostrum with a machine gun? good laughing
  6. +1
    15 November 2019 08: 18
    This is the right way out .. The base was previously squeezed out, now the runway has been taken away .. Russian, they are like that ..)))) angry
  7. +1
    15 November 2019 11: 08
    It remains to resolve the issue with the safety of personnel and equipment.
  8. 0
    15 November 2019 11: 41
    Quote: Ros 56
    It remains to resolve the issue with the safety of personnel and equipment.

    ===
    judging by the video, the equipped perimeter is saved