Military connection: yesterday, today, tomorrow

10
October 20 in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation celebrated the Day of the military signalman and the centenary of the formation of the signal troops. It was military communications that became the main topic of the next issue of the Military Acceptance program.





During the period of hostilities, communications have been and remain a necessary and most important condition for the timely exchange of information, ensuring quick and high-quality alerts, as well as coordinated command and control. Even the experience of the Great Patriotic War showed that the outcome of hostilities largely depends on military communications.

“Military Acceptance” will slightly open the veil of secrecy in this issue and talk about the organization of military communications. Viewers will see much of what no one has yet shown: a satellite phone for special forces, which are not afraid of the most severe trials, a commander’s personal radio station that is not afraid of attacks, as well as a collection of mobile phones that can be used during the service. Viewers will also know when such devices will appear in the majority of the military. In addition, the program “Military Acceptance” will show tests of the most modern means of communication with fire, noise, and ... time. A review of military communications: yesterday, today and in the future.

10 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ross xnumx Rank
    Ross xnumx
    -1
    30 October 2019 06: 09
    Still, the connection was and remains the army intelligentsia. It took some 30 years and among the means of communication is no longer visible technology of the Soviet era. My deep admiration and thanks to the authors.
    good
    1. 2 Level Advisor Rank
      2 Level Advisor
      +2
      30 October 2019 11: 55
      as a signalman, I’m not going to argue about communication-intelligentsia wink but I don’t agree about the fact that there is no Soviet technology anymore, but a new one has begun to arrive, but it is still a long way to a complete replacement of the Soviet one, if of course you primarily meant the models, and not the year of manufacture ...
      1. Ross xnumx Rank
        Ross xnumx
        +1
        30 October 2019 12: 04
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        Of course, you mean first of all ...

        ... shown in the video. I also have a direct relationship with the communications troops.
      2. ccsr Rank
        ccsr
        +4
        30 October 2019 13: 33
        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
        Yes, a new one began to arrive, but it’s still far from the complete replacement of the Soviet one,

        Especially at stationary communication centers - there are also K-60 and TT-48 still standing there. True and fiber has come, but they are kept in reserve.
  2. Mikhail Drabkin Rank
    Mikhail Drabkin
    +4
    30 October 2019 06: 14
    —- As an engineer - radio engineer, Russia since the time of Alexander Sergeyevich Popov - the inventor of radio, has always been, is and will be a leading power in military communications systems! And therefore, the Russian electronic warfare systems are in the forefront of the world military and military equipment.
    —- The USA uses the achievements and brains of Russian scientists, be it Ufimtsev in matters of “stealth”, Zvorykin in television, Kotelnikov in optimal radio reception ... Bonch-Bruevich and Mints in powerful radio transmitters .... Nobel laureates Basov and Prokhorov inventors of lasers and optical transmission of information ..
    —- Once again, with the last birthday, and so that the communication channel is always reliable, it meets the quantitative (and qualitative) parameters of the processed information, and the excellent signal-to-noise ratio (Noise + Distortion)!
    1. Cetron Rank
      Cetron
      0
      30 October 2019 20: 42
      All great inventions are very reminiscent of salmon, they are born in Russia, they prefer to live and pour fat abroad, they return to Russia and die.
  3. srha Rank
    srha
    0
    30 October 2019 08: 03
    As long as there are frequencies that are closed to society by the military - military communications are, by definition, bad, because they show that even domestic radioactivity interferes with them, and what happens with active enemy opposition ... The 08/08 events were the last vivid large-scale confirmation of this (if anyone remembers, live correspondents provided satellite telephones for communication with Moscow).
  4. lambert Rank
    lambert
    0
    30 October 2019 08: 21
    Quote: srha
    As long as there are frequencies that are closed to society by the military - military communications are, by definition, bad, because they show that even domestic radioactivity interferes with them, and what happens with active enemy opposition ... The 08/08 events were the last vivid large-scale confirmation of this (if anyone remembers, live correspondents provided satellite telephones for communication with Moscow).

    She doesn’t understand anything at all.
    1. srha Rank
      srha
      0
      31 October 2019 13: 59
      Do you understand? Did you explain why in the 08/08 war, generals on live TV contacted the generals in Moscow via telephones of correspondents?
  5. lambert Rank
    lambert
    0
    30 October 2019 08: 26
    Belozer stands and talks. Well, storytellers - safety standards are not for him.