Military Review

Russia handed over to Tajikistan another batch of military equipment and weapons

70
The Ministry of Defense donated a batch of military equipment and weapons worth 320 million rubles to the Tajik armed forces. This was reported by the press service of the Central Military District.


Russia handed over to Tajikistan another batch of military equipment and weapons


In Dushanbe, a ceremony was held to transfer the Tajik military party of Russian military equipment and weapons. The transfer took place at the Gissar airfield at the end of the joint exercises of the countries participating in the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) "Unbreakable Brotherhood-2019".

According to the data provided by the RF Ministry of Defense, Russia donated to the Tajik Armed Forces a batch of modernized armored reconnaissance and patrol vehicles BRDM-2 and a radar station for airspace control.

Today, at the Gissar airdrome, another batch of military equipment is presented, which includes a radar station (...) modernized (...) BRDM-2M. This is a proven and reliable military equipment capable of performing a wide range of tasks in modern combat. The transferred military products will increase the combat potential of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Tajikistan and will serve to maintain peace and strengthen security in the region

- the press service quotes the commander of the Central Military District, Colonel-General Alexander Lapin.

It should be noted that this is not the first time that Russia has supplied military equipment to the Tajik army for free. Deliveries are carried out as part of the modernization of the Tajik armed forces in order to increase the combat effectiveness of Russia's ally in the Central Asian region. The main purpose of the supplied equipment and weapons is to control the border with Afghanistan, where significant forces of militants of terrorist organizations are concentrated.
70 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Invoce
    Invoce 29 October 2019 10: 57
    +2
    Everything is correct! Only now there is no need for liberal members of the forum to focus on "Free of charge". Let the Tajiks defend their borders themselves, stop drug trafficking, and Russia will help in whatever way it can
    1. DimerVladimer
      DimerVladimer 29 October 2019 11: 07
      +24
      Quote: Invoce
      stop drug trafficking


      As if drug trafficking is going the old fashioned caravans across the border?
      No, he goes by cars and containers through the corrupt handles of well-known customs officials and BRDM will not help here ...
      1. Serg65
        Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 03
        +11
        Quote: DimerVladimer
        As if drug trafficking is going the old fashioned caravans across the border?

        Every year, several dozen clashes with drug smugglers take place on the Tajik-Afghan border, last year a border guard commander died in one of the battles.
      2. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 29 October 2019 23: 51
        +1
        Quote: DimerVladimer
        going in the old fashion caravans across the border?

        Just like - be surprised at the scale. fellow But this is, nevertheless, a grassroots level.
        Quote: DimerVladimer
        he goes by machines and containers through corrupt

        Pale yellow, and meaningless. Only VERY serious structures with appropriate logistics and transport can work with such volumes. Like mattress dealers with shoulder straps and without, who, especially without steaming, use the BTA.
    2. Greg Miller
      Greg Miller 29 October 2019 11: 08
      +10
      The Russian border guards, when they were in Tajikistan, did indeed stop drug trafficking, and Tajiks are more likely not to suppress, but control this drug traffic ...
      1. bessmertniy
        bessmertniy 29 October 2019 11: 16
        -2
        There is still some kind of control, and not every party reaches the middle of Russia. wink
        1. Greg Miller
          Greg Miller 29 October 2019 11: 22
          +5
          Like Griboyedov: "Blessed is he who believes, it is easy for him in the world ...". But seriously, after the transfer of control over the Tajik-Afghan border to Tajikistan, drug traffic has grown more than 5 times in a year.
          1. Serg65
            Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 05
            0
            Quote: Greg Miller
            after the transfer of control over the Tajik-Afghan border to Tajikistan, drug trafficking for the year increased by more than 5 times ..

            Drug trafficking increased many times immediately after the withdrawal of the 40 Army from Afghanistan!
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 29 October 2019 12: 15
              +1
              Quote: Serg65
              Drug trafficking increased many times immediately after the withdrawal of the 40 Army from Afghanistan!

              Especially after the Yankees got in there. I have the impression that they not only do not stop drug trafficking there, but also are engaged in poppy cultivation in between the bombing of wedding and funeral processions.
              1. Serg65
                Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 23
                +3
                Quote: Piramidon
                Especially after the Yankees got in there

                When the U.S. Air Force base was at Bishkek Airport, the Yankees drove the Gerych to Europe through Albania.
              2. Lexa-149
                Lexa-149 30 October 2019 11: 16
                0
                Little of! In Afghanistan, there is no production of reagents for processing raw opium into heroin. Americans imported these reagents and continue to import.
      2. Nycomed
        Nycomed 29 October 2019 11: 26
        -9
        They have constant clashes with the Kyrgyz for this control.
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 05
          +1
          Can you give an example?
      3. seti
        seti 29 October 2019 12: 13
        +4
        If you have information, please inform the FSB. And if there is no information, then why talk in vain with language? And so categorically.
    3. Mikhail Drabkin
      Mikhail Drabkin 29 October 2019 11: 15
      +1
      You write Invoce:
      Let the Tajiks defend their borders themselves, stop drug trafficking, and Russia will help what it can

      —- Without the 201 base of the Russian Ministry of Defense - in fact, nothing from the word “never”
      —- Tajikistan’s defense dependence on Russia is to Russia's advantage.
    4. orionvitt
      orionvitt 29 October 2019 11: 30
      0
      Quote: Invoce
      Russia will help than it can

      Frankly, Tajikistan, an ally, is still one, but there is no other on the southern borders. So you have to put up. And what to do, not from a good life.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 29 October 2019 13: 32
        0
        Quote: orionvitt
        Quote: Invoce
        Russia will help than it can

        Frankly, Tajikistan, an ally, is still one, but there is no other on the southern borders. So you have to put up. And what to do, not from a good life.

        As one smart man said - for lack of a duchess, you have to use a cook. laughing
        1. orionvitt
          orionvitt 29 October 2019 13: 36
          0
          Quote: Piramidon
          have to use a cook.

          That's for sure, in the top ten.
        2. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 29 October 2019 23: 58
          +2
          Quote: Piramidon
          for lack of a duchess, one has to use a cook.

          Uh-huh, but it would be good for her, this cook, to take home her cooks, who are busy here on construction sites, but they only know two words: "registration" and "grazhdanstva".
    5. Prisoner
      Prisoner 29 October 2019 11: 34
      0
      But they can also push to the left. East is a delicate matter. And for "gratuitously" donors will quietly chm-o-rit and call names for everyone, but that they would not hear for the time being. And they are definitely not liberals. soldier
    6. self-propelled
      self-propelled 29 October 2019 11: 37
      +3
      Quote: Invoce
      Everything is correct! Only now there is no need for liberal members of the forum to focus on "Free of charge".

      gratis (i.e. for nothing, as the Owl said smile )
      - does not mean in vain.
      - maintenance of equipment (even free of charge) costs money;
      - loyalty also has a price;
      as a result, we have the basis for further cooperation (and there is a sea of ​​options and opportunities).

      ... but it would be possible to sell, and to distribute the money to pensioners ... wassat - waiting for screams hi
    7. Cut Samshitov
      Cut Samshitov 29 October 2019 11: 44
      0
      Quote: Invoce
      Everything is correct! Only now there is no need for liberal members of the forum to focus on "Free of charge". Let the Tajiks defend their borders themselves, stop drug trafficking, and Russia will help in whatever way it can

      Sometimes giving is beneficial. Storage and maintenance of equipment as well as disposal costs money. The main thing is to sign agreements and contracts BEFORE handing over the gifts. And it is MANDATORY to stipulate that the donated equipment is allergic to the presence of "strategic partners" in the region.
    8. GRF
      GRF 29 October 2019 12: 05
      0
      Quote: Invoce
      Everything is correct! Only now there is no need for liberal members of the forum to focus on "Free of charge". Let the Tajiks defend their borders themselves, stop drug trafficking, and Russia will help in whatever way it can

      huh, are liberals outraged by the word for free? Yes, they liberalized the country and for less ...
      and so, according to the transfer, then there still needs to be (well, along the path of drug trafficking) free of charge, to Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan ... without any guarantee that the drugs will not be transported in the transferred equipment ... but somehow it’s inconvenient with holes bad chtol ...
      and a boom to defend against Latin American drug trafficking?

      Everything is right - this is when your own border is equipped, and it’s probably necessary to equip it with unmanned equipment controlled by us, but it’s better to sell the equipment controlled by us and not give it to friends, because protection costs a lot of money.

      in the modern world they judge respectability by price ...
    9. Piramidon
      Piramidon 29 October 2019 12: 09
      +1
      Quote: Invoce
      Let the Tajiks defend their borders themselves, stop drug trafficking, and Russia will help what it can

      I think that cutting this equipment into metal will be less useful than the fact that Tajikistan will be at least some kind of buffer in drug trafficking from Afghanistan.
      1. Sling cutter
        Sling cutter 29 October 2019 12: 34
        -7
        Piramidon (Stepan. Russia) The question is, who still oversees drug trafficking.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 29 October 2019 12: 39
          0
          Quote: Stroporez
          The question is, who still oversees drug trafficking.

          Well, is it really not clear that they are the coolest "Stars and Stripes Democrats." For this they stuck there.
          1. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 29 October 2019 13: 51
            -7
            Piramidon (Stepan. Russia)
            Unfortunately, the statistics speaks of other beneficiaries. When I was in those parts of the world, I traveled from a hospital in Kabul to my military unit, I had to go through the "transfer" again, and then to the airfield, since the convoy had to go only after 4 days, I waited for the passing guard. I had to spend a day with the local guards in their locker, that's where the medical boards were loaded into the Union and some warrant officers from the Kabul commandant's office loaded into these boards something with which I fought for a year and a half ..., it was 88th year and before the withdrawal remained .....
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 29 October 2019 14: 20
              +1
              Quote: Stroporez
              Piramidon (Stepan. Russia)
              Unfortunately, the statistics speaks of other beneficiaries. When I was in those parts of the world, I traveled from a hospital in Kabul to my military unit, I had to go through the "transfer" again, and then to the airfield, since the convoy had to go only after 4 days, I waited for the passing guard. I had to spend a day with the local guards in their locker, that's where the medical boards were loaded into the Union and some ensign from the Kabul commandant, they loaded something on these boards with which I fought for a year and a half ..., it was the 88th year and it remained until the withdrawal .....

              Do you really think that these ensigns are still there and are engaged in the drug business? Even if in a drunken delirium it was assumed, then the Yankes would not let them close there now. You specifically asked - "The question is, who is in charge of drug trafficking?" So what nafig can there be now Soviet ensigns? Debilism of some sort. fool
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. Sling cutter
                Sling cutter 29 October 2019 14: 34
                -8
                Piramidon (Stepan. Russia Unfortunately you do not have imaginative thinking. request If you were attentive to the news feeds, you would have seen the Argentinean "cement", and the barge with 10 tons of selected potion marked with a certain steering party, and you should remember about the St. Petersburg affairs.
                keep the fan to cool the boiling moshaaa yes
  2. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 29 October 2019 11: 04
    -5
    Gift - no money needed ...
    1. Serg65
      Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 06
      0
      Quote: DimerVladimer
      Gift - no money needed ..

      How much does it cost to dispose of old BRDMs?
      1. armata_armata
        armata_armata 29 October 2019 13: 03
        +3
        How much does it cost to dispose of old BRDMs?

        If we consider that they are actively being sold from storage and are being bought as actively, then the disposal of the BRDM will bring the MO from 850 rubles
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 29 October 2019 13: 37
          +4
          Those. giving Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan 39 cars, the Moscow Region lost 33 million rubles or 6 2-room apartments in the immediate vicinity of Moscow. Loyalty of local authorities for 6 apartments is probably a worthy deal wink
      2. kjhg
        kjhg 29 October 2019 13: 07
        0
        How much is? On this MO can still earn money. To remove the weapon - time. Non-ferrous metals - two. For scrap, the body itself is three. In addition, rubber is also coming and being taken for money. The money is certainly not very big, but with a large batch a normal amount can come out. Let the MO conclude a contract with me for the disposal of armored vehicles, it will not remain in the loser.
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 29 October 2019 13: 39
          +2
          Quote: kjhg
          Let MO sign a contract with me

          The question is not for me, write a Shoigu offer, there are also 970 cars for storage that every day consume a piece of the budget of the Moscow Region, I think Shoigu will meet you!
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 29 October 2019 14: 54
          +1
          Quote: kjhg
          How much is? On this MO can still earn money. To remove the weapon - time. Non-ferrous metals - two. For scrap, the body itself is three. In addition, rubber is also coming and being taken for money. The money is certainly not very big, but with a large batch a normal amount can come out. Let the MO conclude a contract with me for the disposal of armored vehicles, it will not remain in the loser.

          Not everything is measured simply in rubles. How to calculate and how much to assess the loyalty of Tajikistan in relation to Russia? No need to measure interstate relations only from the perspective of your wallet
  3. Livonetc
    Livonetc 29 October 2019 11: 05
    +4
    Such a car, but to my country house.
    good
    1. bouncyhunter
      bouncyhunter 29 October 2019 11: 11
      +4
      hi
      Quote: Livonetc
      Such a car, but to my country house.

      So it seems like there are "fenced" BRDM-2. Without a tower and all other military equipment. wink
      1. bessmertniy
        bessmertniy 29 October 2019 11: 17
        +2
        Gold cucumbers and tomatoes will be if you dangle to the cottage in such a machine.
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 29 October 2019 11: 26
          +4
          I agree, but they are buying it. On zomboyaschik somehow watched the transfer precisely about such, and already with specific owners.
        2. Piramidon
          Piramidon 29 October 2019 12: 19
          +3
          Quote: bessmertniy
          Gold cucumbers and tomatoes will be if you dangle to the cottage in such a machine.

          Like in a joke. If you refuel this machine with the engine turned on, then the flow will exceed the intake. laughing
  4. Roman070280
    Roman070280 29 October 2019 11: 08
    -8
    Yeah, free of charge, how come ... after the Russians have already paid for this with their VAT.
    1. Stalllker
      Stalllker 29 October 2019 11: 18
      +6
      These cars are nine hundred shaggy year, Soviet citizens paid for everything!
      1. Roman070280
        Roman070280 29 October 2019 12: 28
        -2
        Perhaps you are right .. although for me there is no huge difference between Russian and Soviet citizens ..
        If only after 10 years I didn’t have to buy these machines for myself from the Chinese .. in a couple to AN-2 ..))
    2. Serg65
      Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 09
      +1
      Quote: Roman070280
      Russians have already paid for this with their VAT.

      laughing I do not look at your wallet, but a straight bag! How did you pay for decades of production in the USSR that stood at the custody?
      1. Roman070280
        Roman070280 29 October 2019 12: 25
        -4
        No way ..
        You yourself came up with it, as if I personally paid from my wallet / bag .. therefore, we could have come up with our own answer ..))
        1. Serg65
          Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 32
          +1
          Quote: Roman070280
          Russians have already paid for this with their VAT.

          what So you are not a Russian?
          1. Roman070280
            Roman070280 29 October 2019 12: 38
            -6
            If we are talking about one of .. Yes .. of course ..
            The phrase about the bag was simply not clear .. as if I were the only one meant ..
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 29 October 2019 12: 21
      +2
      Quote: Roman070280
      Yeah, free of charge, how come ... after the Russians have already paid for this with their VAT.

      Roma, when these cars were released, you most likely were not even a spermatozoid yet. How could you pay for their production? And then there were no "Russians".
      1. Roman070280
        Roman070280 29 October 2019 12: 46
        -6
        there were no "Russians" at that time.

        Exactly .. instead of them the Germans were .. They released everything ..))


        when these cars were released, you most likely weren’t even a spermatozoon. How could you make them pay?


        The Crimean garrison military court convicted two servicemen for the unauthorized launch of an X-29TD guided missile in the hangar, which led to the destruction of two missiles, equipment and damage to the hangar.
        The incident occurred on October 1, 2017.
        Experts believed that the Ministry of Defense suffered material damage in the amount of more than 46 million rubles.
        The court sentenced Alexei Chebanov in the form of a one-year and three-month military service restriction with deduction of 15% of his monetary allowance to the state’s income, and Nikolai Zverev - a year of restriction with 10% in favor of the state.


        These guys, too, probably were not spermatozoa when that rocket was launched .. however, they still pay for it ..
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 29 October 2019 13: 17
          0
          Quote: Roman070280
          there were no "Russians" at that time.

          Exactly .. instead of them the Germans were .. They released everything ..))


          when these cars were released, you most likely weren’t even a spermatozoon. How could you make them pay?


          The Crimean garrison military court convicted two servicemen for the unauthorized launch of an X-29TD guided missile in the hangar, which led to the destruction of two missiles, equipment and damage to the hangar.
          The incident occurred on October 1, 2017.
          Experts believed that the Ministry of Defense suffered material damage in the amount of more than 46 million rubles.
          The court sentenced Alexei Chebanov in the form of a one-year and three-month military service restriction with deduction of 15% of his monetary allowance to the state’s income, and Nikolai Zverev - a year of restriction with 10% in favor of the state.


          These guys, too, probably were not spermatozoa when that rocket was launched .. however, they still pay for it ..

          You really are fool , or pretend to be? request
          1. Then there was the Soviet Union, not Russia, and this stupid definition of "Russians" was introduced into use by the drunk Boriska. So they weren't released by the "Germans" fool and Soviet people (Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Georgians ...)
          2. No need to juggle and pull the owl over the globe. I wrote to you about when these machines were released, not about when they were used. Murder with an ax produced in the Russian Empire never relieved responsibility for its use in the subsequent time. You write that supposedly you, a "Russian", somehow managed to pay for the production of these BRDMs in the 79s - 80s of the last century. Rave.
          1. Roman070280
            Roman070280 29 October 2019 14: 10
            -4
            This is you so ..))
            We will now argue on the topic of how Russians differ from Russians ??
            Я Russian wrote in language - that they are not Germans, and not Fritz, and not the Nazis did .. And WE !! Grandfathers, parents .. all this is ours !!
            And distort and pull the owl, dodging terminology .. this has nothing to do with the topic ..

            I wrote to you about when these machines were released, and not about when they were used.

            Well, well .. That car was released 5 years ago .. And ?? And if 15 years ago ?? And if the tank is 35 years old ?? Some of them can simply be counted among the "Soviet" heritage, and with a calm conscience and a pure soul throw / break / give ??
            And how do they differ ?? Maybe you can give a 5-year-old too ?? And leave only yesterday?
            That rocket, in fact, could also not be exploited, but given to someone .. What is the difference ?? And you would now prove to me how old she is (and she is old) ..


            You write that supposedly you, a "Russian", somehow contrived pay production of these BRDM in the 79s - 80s of the last century. Rave.


            Yes, probably, according to this logic, everything is Soviet and was plundered with the collapse of the Union .. For the "smart people" from the 90s decided that since all this was done / built by Soviet people, then it has nothing to do with the Russian people / Russians, and you can take everything for yourself ..

            When a student just graduated from an educational institution, and has not worked anywhere else a day .. he sees, for example, how factories / budget money are spent in his country .. that were built / earned by generations .. Then this student can be sent away .. after all, he personally did not pay any of the above ..))
            1. Piramidon
              Piramidon 29 October 2019 15: 02
              -1
              Quote: Roman070280
              Grandfathers, parents .. all this is ours !!

              My grandparents and parents never called themselves "Russians". And I myself consider myself just a Russian, a citizen of Russia.
              We will now argue on the topic of how Russians differ from Russians ??

              Russian is a nationality, and a Russian is, well, probably a citizen of the Russian Federation. And it can be any citizen of our MULTINATIONAL country, regardless of nationality
              1. Roman070280
                Roman070280 29 October 2019 15: 52
                -3
                We will now argue on the topic of how Russians differ from Russians ??
                Tell me about nationalities, evading terminology .. this has nothing to do with the topic ..
                1. Piramidon
                  Piramidon 29 October 2019 16: 24
                  -2
                  Quote: Roman070280
                  Tell me about nationalities, evading terminology .. this has nothing to do with the topic ..

                  Answers of a typical troll verbiage. Pick up our dialogue and see where it started. You claimed that as a "Russian" you paid for the release of Soviet armored vehicles, balabol. negative
                  1. Roman070280
                    Roman070280 31 October 2019 10: 11
                    -3
                    The troll and verbiage will still tell me who the troll is here ??)
                    Boy, are you out of your mind ??))

                    It began with the fact that the local natives of the Russian Federation 50 years ago built and produced something .. and then other uncles came and started to give all this to Africa .. When I pointed out that actually, all this was done by forces and for money of these very locals, who are both my parents, and I, and my children, no matter what the name of the country is, here comes a verbiage and a demagogue who begins to tell me the terminology, where did the Russian word come from, about drunken Yeltsin, and other crap .. When this balabol was gently hinted (twice !!) that it’s not necessary to make out here how the Russian differs from the Russian, because this does not apply to the topic, he continued to beat his head up anyway ..

                    Russian - well, surely, This is a citizen of the Russian Federation.

                    Not sure, but for sure !!
                    Although, for the fifth time - this does not apply to the topic .. Though call zelibob residents of some camp ....
                    And it can be any Citizen of our MULTINATIONAL country, regardless of nationality

                    I just wrote that it was not the Russians who paid, but the Russians !! (for some reason you got into trouble with the nationalities) .. For the Buryats also built all kinds of hydroelectric power stations in Siberia .. And if someone blows up this hydropower plant tomorrow or gives it to Africa, any Buryat can justly be outraged, saying that actually Belongs to the material wealth of Russians, because built by their forces !!

                    Chew normally, so that it comes to what it is about .. otherwise you will start again about the differences between a Soviet person and a Russian and a Russian person ..))
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 29 October 2019 11: 14
      -1
      Dependence is such a dependency, at any moment they can change hands and receive free of charge the equipment of another state.
      1. knn54
        knn54 29 October 2019 12: 02
        +2
        More than 1300 km of the border with Afghanistan. And thousands of Islamists ready to invade at any moment.
        Personnel training (at the higher educational institutions of the Russian Federation and at the base in Tajikistan).
        And resuscitation (in the right direction) of the Northern Alliance, as a counterbalance to the same Taliban and IS.
      2. Serg65
        Serg65 29 October 2019 12: 10
        0
        They can’t, they had a good vaccination in 90!
  6. gafarovsafar
    gafarovsafar 29 October 2019 11: 16
    -3
    only one thing can be said about drug trafficking
    as long as there is demand there will be offers
    initially wrong tactics to combat this evil
    they try to catch the sellers of potions, and this is how you cut off a hydra, one head grows two new
    first of all, it is necessary to plant the consumer and not just to plant, but to treat and re-educate them with labor (not to be confused with the Philippines where they are both killed by both the seller and the buyer)
    tell someone hunting for the sake of temporary enjoyment to cut down the forest where is the thread in Magadan. to sow bread in the steppes of Kazakhstan or to hammer stones with a sledgehammer, hell knows which quarry
    knowing about such consequences of drug use, a reasonable person will quit not only smoking and injecting alcohol but also drinking, and especially stubborn ones will dissolve in the vast expanses of the Motherland, benefiting others with their free labor
    and in the end there will be no demand and there will be no supply, and so it turns out, as it were, it’s not cancer itself that is being treated but its consequences
    1. nPuBaTuP
      nPuBaTuP 29 October 2019 12: 06
      +1
      The Forbidden fruit is sweet...
      It is not necessary to plant consumers and distributors, but to shoot manufacturers and organizers of drug cartels ...
      1. gafarovsafar
        gafarovsafar 9 November 2019 08: 07
        0
        merchants look at drugs as goods that do not deteriorate and are very easy to transport. They do not care about the moral side of things. They only have one thing to buy when they need to increase sales. And if there are no smokers and stitches, who will buy the poison? and the consequence is no sales, there will be no product itself
    2. Roman070280
      Roman070280 29 October 2019 12: 34
      -6
      tell someone hunting for the sake of temporary enjoyment to cut down the forest where is the thread in Magadan. to sow bread in the steppes of Kazakhstan or to hammer stones with a sledgehammer, hell knows which quarry
      knowing about such effects of drug use reasonable people


      And why immediately start with drugs ?? Yes, this is evil .. but those who rob the country bring much more evil .. There’s a topic about heating in the next branch ..
      If you drive the entire State Duma, but with families .. yes, other owners of yachts / football clubs .. Would there really be an extra forest for our country ?? In my opinion, this is very reasonably..
    3. Piramidon
      Piramidon 29 October 2019 12: 43
      +2
      Quote: gafarovsafar
      first of all, it is necessary to plant the consumer and not just to plant, but to treat and re-educate them with labor (not to be confused with the Philippines where they are both killed by both the seller and the buyer)

      Have you tried forcibly treating an alcoholic or drug addict? Until he wants to - hell what you can do.
    4. kjhg
      kjhg 29 October 2019 13: 30
      +1
      Quote: gafarovsafar
      and in the end there will be no demand and there will be no supply, and so it turns out, as it were, it’s not cancer itself that is being treated but its consequences

      Bravo! good You are a brilliant man! Such geniuses are born one in a million or they appear in a laboratory way, like Professor Preobrazhensky. If people like you were in charge of the country, then one of two things: either there would be no drug addiction, no alcoholism, no smoking, no swear words, and not a single human vice. Or the country would not be left at all. And, something tells me that rather Christ will reappear on Earth than the first option is realized.
      1. gafarovsafar
        gafarovsafar 9 November 2019 07: 57
        0
        and you try to do so in at least one city. Convert all drug addicts and send no to jail but to hard work for free. If it works, then repeat the experience all over the country and at the end with Professor Preobrazhensky you will be a little bit
  7. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 29 October 2019 11: 25
    +4
    We are strengthening this difficult direction, and we all know those who want to shake up the situation there at hand near Russia.
  8. Naz
    Naz 29 October 2019 11: 28
    -3
    Big brother gives everyone presents.
  9. Mikhail Zarokov
    Mikhail Zarokov 29 October 2019 11: 29
    0
    Tajikistan will pay migrant workers.
  10. mvmptzna
    mvmptzna 29 October 2019 23: 47
    0
    modernized armored reconnaissance and patrol vehicles "BRDM-2"

    - Looking at these cars, I really want to laugh at Ukrainian home-made showerheads, as is customary in VO; even a cycle of mocking articles came out.
    Whether the matter is here; superpower upgraded, immediately obvious.


    - Not like some handicraftsmen.
  11. Sapsan136
    Sapsan136 30 October 2019 12: 34
    +1
    And what does Russia receive in return from Tajikistan, except for the flow of drugs and ethnic crime ?! Is it time for Putin to resign, along with Medvedev, otherwise they have already tired of squandering Russia ...