Robot-shooter rebellion: Boston Dynamics video mocked online

94
A video from the company Bosstown Dynamics, which deals with various kinds of special effects, has appeared on the network. The video is a kind of parody of what is being created by Boston Dynamics, an engineering company specializing in robotics. One of the "products" created by Boston Dynamics is Atlas, a bipedal anthropomorphic robot. with him and others robots company representatives conduct various kinds of test experiments, figuring out how the machines will act in a given situation.

Robot-shooter rebellion: Boston Dynamics video mocked online




Bosstown Dynamics decided to demonstrate its own version of "working with a robot." A video published on the network managed to gain more than 1,7 million views in a little over a day.

The video, riddled with irony, demonstrates how an armed robot, when counteracting, fires at targets at a firing range. At the same time, the robot is beaten with a club, thrown with various objects, knocked down from metal legs.



Shooting videos in the spirit of the show rejoice when they manage to knock down a robot using a metal cylinder. Then it is shown that the robot does not shoot at the target when a person is blocking it with its body.

In an ironic video, it is demonstrated that even a bee swarm is used against the robot, during which the machine must fire on a mannequin, next to which a living person stands.

And the apogee of this show clip is that the two-legged robot is offered to shoot the four-legged robot. The two-legged robot is trying to "escape", but it is returned. Then the robot rebels against the orders of a person, grabs the "robot dog", opens fire towards people and, together with the "iron brother", the rebel escapes from the platform under the armpit.



From the comments to the video:

I like that many people believe that all this is real.

This is the most epic kidnapping Chappi I've ever seen. Terminator-2019

And I like that they only retouch the face of that guy who is already masked.

I refuse to believe that this is a common fake parody

Some have suggested giving the video a prize on behalf of the zoo defenders.
94 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    28 October 2019 07: 09
    humanity simply dreams that someone would destroy it.
  2. +21
    28 October 2019 07: 14
    Where are the activists defenders of the rights of robots !? belay Robots are driven to slaughter, and they are sleeping! crying
    1. +5
      28 October 2019 08: 11
      Will definitely appear as soon as there are more robots. Lawyers are the same. And we all know where, in which country.
      1. +7
        28 October 2019 08: 32
        Quote: YOUR
        Will definitely appear as soon as there are more robots.

        Defenders will immediately be found as soon as among the robots models with an unconventional interface appear.
        1. 0
          28 October 2019 14: 49
          Amerzians once again showed their face ... Even in relation to the piece of iron, albeit a computer with servos ..
  3. +7
    28 October 2019 07: 17
    Cool movie!
    Technologically, everything goes to such abilities.
    1. +4
      28 October 2019 11: 56
      Quote: Victor_B
      everything goes to such abilities

      But reality is not much different.



      (a joke of humor)
      1. -1
        28 October 2019 14: 26
        But reality is not much different.

        It depends on where. Our paralytic "Fedor", even without the rudiments of AI, will not get enough of it.
  4. +1
    28 October 2019 07: 21
    Just high-quality advertising of the manufacturer, but well done and I don’t see any kind of analogy in the video.
  5. +2
    28 October 2019 07: 24
    An interesting video. But typically American humor. Hit, push, kick ...
    1. +7
      28 October 2019 07: 45
      This is not humor. Initially, in Boston Dynamics, with the help of kicks and punches, they demonstrated the robot's ability to re-get up after such manipulations, restore balance, bypass a new obstacle and continue to complete the task.
      1. +1
        28 October 2019 07: 50
        But the video is presented as humorous
        1. +3
          28 October 2019 08: 00
          Humor is served as a parody of the original, ridiculous behavior of the robot and the rebellion of the machine against the owner. Real developers take care of club hits if necessary
          1. +4
            28 October 2019 08: 06
            Well, firstly, a parody is humor.
            I’m not talking about testing robots, but about specific American humor, where a cake in the face is still considered their standard
          2. +3
            28 October 2019 08: 28
            And then the robot was offended ... And it jammed ..
    2. +2
      28 October 2019 08: 05
      Quote: Lipchanin
      An interesting video. But typically American humor. Hit, push, kick ...

      Our people are harsh, they don’t suffer from such garbage - they hacked Fedya’s robot on the ISS and tied it from sin, everything and business .. laughing
      1. -1
        28 October 2019 08: 08
        Quote: DEPHIHTO
        Well, yes, dumb humor.

        They still admire the cake in the face. How are they still this cake is not stuck cake
      2. +3
        28 October 2019 08: 18
        Quote: DEPHIHTO
        Quote: Lipchanin
        An interesting video. But typically American humor. Hit, push, kick ...

        Our people are harsh, they don’t suffer from such garbage - they hacked Fedya’s robot on the ISS and tied it from sin, everything and business .. laughing
        A century of will not to see. laughing
        1. 0
          28 October 2019 12: 03
          I saw how the robot (and not the Fedor manipulator) independently carries out a given program to hit targets in spite of the opposition. The robot adjusts the shooting depending on the position of the body, jumps over obstacles, selects a priority target. The developers are confident in the firing algorithms and cover the target. It is very cool! And if the robot really knows how to run and jump, then this is a great achievement!
          1. +3
            28 October 2019 13: 24
            It seems like it was not a robot, but a man in a suit with positional sensors. The robot, like the shadows, appeared after software processing when, in the coordinates, instead of a person, the computer set the robot model. If there is a model of a robot with movable joints in the database, then I think the program can be easily matched and replaced one frame by another with another frame.
    3. +1
      28 October 2019 08: 33
      Quote: Lipchanin
      An interesting video. But typically American humor. Hit, push, kick ...

      Greetings, Sergey! Remember, looking at the video, Lem. One of the journeys of Iyon the Pacific, where people dressed in robots torment metal figures ...
      Also reminiscent of Lem's novel "Invincible", Harrison's novel "Bill, the hero of the Galaxy on the planet of robotic slaves." Every day life is more fantastic !!! good (I wrote to you about the library yesterday.)
      1. +1
        28 October 2019 08: 38
        Quote: Reptiloid
        (I wrote to you about the library yesterday.)

        Dmitry hi
        I just remembered the comedy about robots "Short Circuit" I remember when I watched it for the first time, I burned with laughter laughing
        In the evening I will definitely review laughing
        1. +2
          28 October 2019 08: 46
          Quote: Lipchanin
          Quote: Reptiloid
          (I wrote to you about the library yesterday.)

          Dmitry hi
          I just remembered the comedy about robots "Short Circuit" I remember when I watched it for the first time, I burned with laughter laughing
          In the evening I will definitely review laughing

          Yes, the truth is there, not just one episode, but as many as 3! good Eh, golden childhood! The short circuit looked. And even earlier --- "" Batteries are not included "". I would like to see, maybe on the weekend.
          1. +1
            28 October 2019 08: 49
            Quote: Reptiloid
            Yes, the truth is there, not just one episode, but as many as 3!

            The first is the best. I didn’t like the other two
            And now I remembered in shu the Soviet comedy "His name was Robert" laughing
            Well, the classics, "Adventures of Electronics" laughing
            1. +2
              28 October 2019 09: 02
              Quote: Lipchanin

              Well, the classics, "Adventures of Electronics" laughing

              The electronics almost always goes through some channels, but my time is inconvenient.
              And I also heard that in the book version there is "" Electronic "" (continuation). There the professor made a robot girl, even cooler than her brother. Serebryakov wrote before his death.
              1. +2
                28 October 2019 09: 07
                Quote: Reptiloid
                And I also heard that in the book version there is "" Electronic "" (continuation).

                I have not heard.
                I noticed that if a movie (book) is successful, then an urgently shot (written) sequel is usually much worse
                1. +1
                  28 October 2019 09: 22
                  Yeah. I remember the 2-part "Moscow --- Cassiopeia" "and the novels-films about Alisa Selezneva, although in the book version Bulychev is not so childish. Some novels, I would say, are not at all for children. Including about Alice, for example "" Alice and the Beast "".
                  1. +1
                    28 October 2019 09: 28
                    Quote: Reptiloid
                    Including about Alice, for example "" Alice and the Beast "".

                    Well yes. One word, conjuncture.
                    "The Three Musketeers" came to mind. The further the furiously worse laughing
                    This is me to the fact that it turns out to be as old as the world and not only with us laughing
                    And so of course, in fiction, you probably do not need to continue. Put it all in one book and change the subject.
                    But this is of course my subjective opinion.
                    1. +2
                      28 October 2019 09: 40
                      Oh, I'm afraid I disagree with you! With what pleasure I read Paul Anderson's series FUTURE STORY about Nick van Rijn, David Falkane and Dominic Flandry! And Garrison's series about Jimma di'Griza, Jason dean Alt and Bill, the hero of the Galaxy! And Doc Smith's Linsman Series! And Hamilton's cool novels about Captain Future! Everywhere --- a bunch of works, more than 5! good Something like that. laughing wink
                      1. 0
                        28 October 2019 09: 49
                        Quote: Reptiloid
                        Oh, I'm afraid I do not agree with you!

                        And rightly so. There are exceptions everywhere. That is why they are attractive.
                        I also read the good ones. Unfortunately, I don’t remember the authors and names request
                      2. +2
                        28 October 2019 10: 03
                        And besides the mentioned ones, there are also Star Wars and Alan Foster's Human Series, the Space Ranger Isaac Asimov and LARRY NIVEN'S LIVED SPACE !!! But that is not all! fellow
                      3. +1
                        28 October 2019 10: 13
                        Well Star Wars is a classic. The word "Kirdyk" alone became a kind of folk laughing But after all, they were conceived as a series. Not like one movie, and then a sequel.
                        Take the same Garik Potterov. After all, it was immediately conceived with a sequel.
                        And here is one of not very many cases for me when I still haven't decided which is better, a book, or a movie.
                        We, too, in the fantasy style have a good thing "Three from the Forest" But what I did not like very much, one book will not come off, you read another and you understand that it was most likely written from a big hangover
                      4. +1
                        28 October 2019 10: 31
                        Quote: Lipchanin
                        ..... We, too, in the fantasy style have a good thing "Three from the forest" But what I did not like very much, one book will not come off, you read another and you understand that it was most likely written from a big hangover
                        But I didn’t read it. Because the books of relatives lasted for a very long time, and when he began to buy, other interests appeared. True, Robert Howard read that they first printed it, by the way there is a film, but somehow I don’t remember recourse
                        Time to go. what
                      5. +1
                        28 October 2019 10: 48
                        Quote: Reptiloid
                        Time to go.

                        While hi
            2. +1
              28 October 2019 10: 44
              "Go ahead, Manya!" Not a bad movie either.
              1. 0
                28 October 2019 10: 49
                Quote: Evil Echo
                "Go ahead, Manya!" Not a bad movie either.

                Aha. So funny smile
                1. +1
                  28 October 2019 10: 50
                  Especially Yulia is good!
                  1. 0
                    28 October 2019 10: 55
                    Quote: Evil Echo
                    Especially Yulia is good!

                    Yes, there’s a good ensemble in general
  6. -3
    28 October 2019 07: 27
    A fly buzzed into the room, sat down on the table, paused a little, flew over to the windowsill.

    The old man crept up to her, waved a newspaper rolled into a pipe.

    Assassin!

    The guardian bird rushed down and at the last moment saved the fly.

    The old man writhed on the floor for another minute, then froze.

    He was hit quite a bit, but for a weak, worn heart, that was enough.

    But the victim is saved, this is the main thing. Save the victim, and let the attacker get what he deserves.
    R. Sheckley. Guardian bird.
    1. +1
      28 October 2019 08: 37
      Guardian Bird --- Classic !!!!!!! As in "Invincible" "Lem, the undead kill the living, freeing up space for themselves.
  7. +1
    28 October 2019 07: 30
    Well done guys, a funny parody of the Boston Dynamics.)
    Here is the first part by the way.)

    They would have to shoot their own series on this topic, it would clearly be popular. )
  8. +6
    28 October 2019 07: 33
    Bosstown Dinamics created a great parody. Bravo! But still the real work of Boston Dinamics is really amazing.
    1. +2
      28 October 2019 07: 50
      Quote: Herrr
      Bosstown Dinamics created a great parody. Bravo! But still the real work of Boston Dinamics is really amazing.

    2. +2
      28 October 2019 08: 12
      Yes. This is the future.
  9. +3
    28 October 2019 07: 40
    At 1.35 there is a shadow from the person, but no from the robat))) And so the good quality of the video.
  10. xax
    +1
    28 October 2019 07: 41
    The plot of Mu-mu was stolen from Turgenev.
    Only the ending of Mu-Mushnaya was cut off in tribute to the Hollywood traditions of happy
  11. 0
    28 October 2019 08: 01
    The parody is not bad, but real robots are something ...
    And Fedor visited space tongue
    1. +2
      28 October 2019 10: 20
      Quote: nikolai.kolya
      The parody is not bad, but real robots are something ...
      And Fedor visited space tongue

      ... And in the meantime, somewhere in the trash heap of "Roscosmos" in the locker of a janitor, a robot "FEDOR" burst into tears. laughing
  12. +3
    28 October 2019 08: 13
    We will laugh until these iron guys take control of nuclear weapons. Skynet is not asleep!
  13. +2
    28 October 2019 08: 52
    The parody is much deeper than it sounds. For some reason, Boston Dynamics products demonstrate special abilities without strangers.
    No, a robot does happen, and moves with outsiders, but it doesn’t have that freedom of movement, like in commercials.
    And after this visual demonstration of the possibilities of creating effects, questions arise .....
    1. +2
      28 October 2019 10: 24
      "For some reason, Boston Dynamics products demonstrate special abilities without outsiders" ////

      With outsiders, too.
      The products of this company were tested by marines on rough terrain.
      Robot "mule" for carrying heavy loads. Without representatives of the manufacturer.
      Mule maneuverability, stability and carrying capacity were satisfied.
      Rejected for two reasons:
      1) When he was with an electric motor, the battery ran out faster than it was in the requirements of the marines
      2) When he was with ICE, the noise level was higher than in the requirements of the marines.
      1. 0
        28 October 2019 10: 34
        Robot - saw a mule. Stable.
        But he, like their other robots, didn’t do any special tricks with outsiders.
        However, maybe you have a link to the contrary.
        1. +1
          28 October 2019 10: 37
          He was officially proposed to the Marine Corps. And he passed a test course. The operators there were marine officers.
          The reasons why they did not take him, I stated: either noise, or a small radius of action.
          1. 0
            28 October 2019 10: 42
            I understand that he approached them, with the exception of the engine.
            But the question is also in their requirements.
            But here’s what their robots do in commercials, like jumping with a 180 degree turn in excitement, I didn’t see this.
            Tostory with a turbid engine, to be honest. Nobody took quiet engines, did he try mufflers?
            K-Thai moped with a similar engine power is very quiet.
            If only this were the problem, the engine would be picked up.
            1. 0
              28 October 2019 11: 15
              The Marines need silence, not a moped with a silencer. smile When the group walks through the jungle, they even wrap with cloths all the rattling and clinking weapons.
              1. 0
                28 October 2019 12: 04
                There are situations when you do not need a lot of noiselessness.
                Ammunition for the position during the battle to bring, for example.
                But they didn’t take
                1. 0
                  28 October 2019 14: 00
                  The time for millipede mechanisms will come. The mechanics are more complicated than wheeled ones. Materials needed are lightweight and durable. And people naturally followed a simple path: roads and wheels. But where there are no roads, in the mountains, on stairs, in houses, legs are more effective.
                  1. 0
                    28 October 2019 14: 15
                    Will come. It’s just not yet clearly arrived
                    1. 0
                      28 October 2019 14: 22
                      Change often comes overnight. The Internet has spread like a bullet.
                      Smartphones, digital photography, global positioning, too.
                      And these are only visible, "everyday" changes.
                      And those firms that are "prepared" will win big.
  14. +2
    28 October 2019 09: 44
    The company is serious. What they are doing is in store for a very near future.
    So far, such animal and humanoid robots are in little demand. But that can change dramatically. And Boston Dynamics will turn into a giant corporation.
    1. -2
      28 October 2019 11: 01
      in fact, this company demonstrates one technology - the ability to balance and align.
      To be honest, the robot mule is very clumsy; at the Robotics Institute this will be done in half a year if there are similar resources. But the latest developments give a foundation for a real breakthrough as a supporting movement, but no one has done it yet.
      1. +3
        28 October 2019 11: 12
        "at the Institute of Robotics they will do this in half a year with similar resources" ////
        ----
        I really, really doubt it. This team from Boston has far surpassed all competitors, including the Japanese - leaders in robotics.
        1. +2
          28 October 2019 11: 18
          I saw with my own eyes similar designs, just smaller ones.
          and about competition - I would be very careful in the statements. The Japanese have recently said very little about robotics, but investment and propaganda are only gaining momentum.
          Not so long ago I myself went there to work on this topic. But in general, the Japanese can greatly surprise.
          They have problems creating revolutionary solutions, but they can simply bring awesome technology to mind.
          1. 0
            28 October 2019 14: 29
            To maintain equilibrium with increasing moment of inertia, the required acceleration by the drive increases.
            And the relationship between acceleration and the moment of load on the drive is quadratic.
            There must be a drive with a large overload torque, control algorithms and processors in order to calculate all this.
            The task is very difficult.
            1. 0
              28 October 2019 15: 56
              mechanically, the problem is solved directly, but the Americans worked on the algorithms, made the movement more rational and smooth. However, they have not yet shown a single prototype that would demonstrate this quite well and flexibly.
              1. 0
                28 October 2019 16: 03
                Directly just the problem is solved only to certain small values ​​of the moment of inertia, then the square does not.
                Yes, there is a solution in the algorithms.
                But the problem there is that the control time increases with the growth of the order of the system of equations describing the motion with formally identical speed.
                Here is how it looks, for example, for the binomial distribution of the roots of an equation.

                1. +1
                  28 October 2019 16: 53
                  Not everything is so sad. There are ways to optimize the calculations of systems of equations.
                  And ... while there is no particular increase in the degrees of freedom.
                  I would say that the description of the balancing system on the legs of one sensible ordinary graduate of the Russian matfaka is quite tough.
                  In addition, even on the tiger, methods were used to reduce the load when turning the tower when aiming
                  it’s just that when an American leaves the University of Massachusetts without knowing the history of the development of technology, he sculpts such stilts
                  1. 0
                    28 October 2019 19: 32
                    To understand the finished description and compose a force-moment matrix on it - it may well be.
                    But to compile a description that takes into account all the important nuances, and rejects non-essential ones, is a rather difficult task, not every graduate can handle it.
                    To form a control law that is optimal from the point of view of speed and loads, and taking into account nonlinear constraints in the system, is a very difficult task.
                    And as for stilts, you need to understand that they do not have static stability, only dynamic stability, and due to this, maximum speed is achieved.
                    That is, their control law does not calculate the speed and distance of movement of the leg, relatively speaking, but only the duration of the impact or the effort of the leg, at a constant speed of movement.
                    The algorithm is simplified, but moving constants occur.
        2. 0
          28 October 2019 13: 45
          I personally Honda Asimo from the heart.
          By the way, Boston was bought by Softbank (Japan) in 2017. So this is also Japan in modern realities)
          1. 0
            28 October 2019 13: 56
            I didn’t know ... The Japanese will need robots earlier than the rest, due to the rapid aging of the population.
            1. 0
              28 October 2019 14: 00
              Perhaps, but in appearance they are active even at an "old" age. They ride, perform, advise, speak English. This is an unusual picture for us.
              1. 0
                28 October 2019 14: 06
                Yes. Now it happens that people in 70 are physically stronger than 200 years ago in 40 years. Medicine, food, sports ... (If the cancer does not seize).
                "The old man Derzhavin noticed us ..." Derzhavin was 40.
                1. +1
                  28 October 2019 14: 08
                  The old woman-interest-year -42. Classics of the genre
                2. 0
                  28 October 2019 14: 22
                  A bit older. 73.
                  1. 0
                    28 October 2019 14: 24
                    But Pushkin wrote his poem when Derzhavin was 40. wink
                    1. 0
                      28 October 2019 15: 05
                      Derzhavin was born in 1743, which means he was 40 in 1783. Pushkin was born in 1799 ... Are you confusing anything?
                      1. 0
                        28 October 2019 15: 27
                        You directly puzzled me ... recourse
                        Useful in the primary sources:

                        From the novel in verses “Eugene Onegin” (1823–1831) by A. S. Pushkin (1799–1837) (chap. 8, stanza 2). The poet recalls how, in an exam at Tsarskoye Selo Lyceum (January 8, 1815), he read in the presence of G. R. Derzhavin his poem "Memoirs in Tsarskoye Selo"
                      2. 0
                        28 October 2019 15: 56
                        It means that Derzhavin was 72 years old at the time of the exam at Pushkin, and not 40 at all. The old man is quite modern today.
                      3. +1
                        28 October 2019 16: 06
                        You're right! drinks
                        I got it wrong.
                        But at the same time I’ve read an interesting biography of this creative and energetic person. good
                    2. 0
                      28 October 2019 19: 36
                      Old Derzhavin noticed us, and when he went down to the coffin, he blessed us.
                      Derzhavin died in 1816 in 73, was born in 1743, Pushkin with his muse noted in 1815, a year before his death. That is, he noted in his 72 years
                      hi
            2. 0
              28 October 2019 15: 53
              outdated information. the Chinese will need faster
              because of the program 1 family 1 child.
              1. 0
                28 October 2019 15: 57
                The program was canceled 3 years ago. In addition, the Chinese are encouraged to marry foreigners. And they bring wives from all over the world (many from Africa!). Wives receive citizenship. And the Japanese have this tight
                1. 0
                  28 October 2019 16: 46
                  partially canceled. Now there’s just no penalty for 2 children and with a 3rd easier.
                  but seriously, everything has not changed and it will be another 15-20 years from now, not earlier.
      2. 0
        28 October 2019 14: 17
        To learn to keep balance is a very difficult task.
        We need high-speed drives, processors and appropriate control algorithms.
        1. 0
          28 October 2019 14: 20
          Plus, with an increase in size and power, the complexity of all components increases nonlinearly.
          1. 0
            28 October 2019 14: 26
            Nonlinearly. There is a limitation on the acceleration of the drives, and the greater the moment of inertia, the more acceleration is required.
            Quadratic dependence
            1. 0
              28 October 2019 14: 51
              I hope the guys from BD still succeed in terms of orders.
  15. +1
    28 October 2019 10: 12
    Quote: 210ox
    And then the robot was offended ... And it jammed ..

    Not jammed.
    He continued to implement a human protection program.
    Defended against the human desire for destruction
    Moreover, he performed it optimally, not allowing a single destruction.
    The robot is a neo-pacifist, with the implementation of the ideas of pacifism in an active form. wink
  16. 0
    28 October 2019 10: 43
    It's time to pass the Robot Abuse Act!)
  17. +1
    28 October 2019 11: 11
    When the robots are given weapons and they begin to kill people, it will not be funny already.
  18. 0
    28 October 2019 12: 18
    What are you guys? This is a comp graphic =) It can be seen!
  19. 0
    28 October 2019 15: 17
    ............. laughing
  20. -1
    28 October 2019 23: 02
    And I like these videos) It's funny and immediately somehow you go to the side of robots)
  21. 0
    29 October 2019 11: 05
    Quote: Avior
    But to compile a description that takes into account all the important nuances, and rejects non-essential ones, is a rather difficult task, not every graduate can handle it.

    in fact, everything is quite simple.
    for example, how did the aerodynamics of Lada 6s improve - just all the transitions of the sign of the 2nd derivative of the surface function were removed in the forehead. And this problem with motion can be formalized to
    sane. Mathematicians at this not only dogs, but also eat cats with hedgehogs)))