The Ministry of Defense received three divisions of the Bastion and 38 Onyx missiles

28
Since the beginning of this year, the Russian Ministry of Defense has received the Onnx cruise missiles in service, and another 38 missiles are currently being transported to customers. This was announced during a single day of military acceptance by the general designer of NPO Mashinostroyeniya Alexander Dergachev.

The Ministry of Defense received three divisions of the Bastion and 38 Onyx missiles




According to Dergachev, according to the plans of the enterprise, as part of the state defense order, it is planned to transfer the Onnix anti-ship cruise missiles and three Bastion coastal systems to the Russian Ministry of Defense 55. To date, two Bastion divisions have been transferred to the armed forces, the third set is ready and is in the process of being delivered to the customer. RCC "Onyx" transferred to the Ministry of Defense 38 pieces, another 17 manufactured and also in the process of transportation to the recipient.

In 2019, the enterprise NPK NPO Mashinostroeniya, within the framework of the state defense order, planned to supply the Bastion coastal systems in the amount of three divisional sets and the Onyx anti-ship cruise missiles in the amount of 55 units. At present, two divisional sets of the complex are delivered Bastion. The third division set is manufactured and transported to the place of basing. 38 Onyx missiles have also been delivered, 17 units have been manufactured and transported to the recipients

- he said.

It was previously reported that NPO Mashinostroyeniya developed a new Onyx-M sea-based cruise anti-ship missile with a firing range of 800 km and increased accuracy. Tests of the new rocket will begin shortly.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    18 October 2019 16: 54
    "Onyx-M" with a firing range of 800 km and increased accuracy.

    But this is just great news. After the INF Treaty’s rupture, it’s time to increase the range of all strike systems, including coastal ones.
    1. +7
      18 October 2019 17: 11
      It makes sense to orient "Onyx" not only to sea targets, but also to the shores of those who "beguiled" them, increasing the range, say, up to 1000 km.
      1. 0
        18 October 2019 17: 27
        Launch of Onyx cruise missiles at terrorist targets in Syria.
        https://ria.ru/20161115/1481433662.html
        The maximum for Onyx-M is 800 km. Do you want more long-range missiles? There is a Caliber, Zircon and X-50 are being tested.
      2. +1
        18 October 2019 17: 33
        not only for sea purposes, but also on the coast

        For these purposes, Iskander is likely to be upgraded.
    2. +1
      18 October 2019 18: 08
      Yes, missiles must be supplied in ever increasing quantities not only to carriers, but also to warehouses.
  2. +4
    18 October 2019 17: 09
    The news is excellent, but it may not be necessary to sound so verbatim, all the same, there must be some kind of secrecy.
    1. +4
      18 October 2019 17: 16
      Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
      but it may not be necessary to sound so verbatim, all the same, there must be some kind of secrecy.

      But who cares, before, such news was all recognized by the Voice of America ....
  3. +1
    18 October 2019 17: 24
    The Ministry of Defense received three divisions of the Bastion and 38 Onyx missiles
    The answer to everyone who is constantly here like a blueprint, dumps out - "it will not be enough, it would be necessary more, if not for Putin, why not earlier, why still" ...
  4. The comment was deleted.
    1. +6
      18 October 2019 17: 33
      Quote: san4es
      .... To date, the armed forces have received two Bastion divisions, the third set is ready and in the process of delivery ................ soldier

      So that's great. They will accept and deliver not today - tomorrow.
  5. +7
    18 October 2019 17: 34

    The start and transition to the combat course is generally fascinating ...
  6. -10
    18 October 2019 17: 44
    Well, tomahawks fly much further, which means their carriers Bastion will not get it, unfortunately.
    1. 0
      18 October 2019 18: 00
      Quote: inner enemy
      Well, tomahawks fly much further, which means their carriers Bastion will not get it, unfortunately.

      Where do you serve that you know in such detail all the performance characteristics and "Calibers" and "Tomahawks" and "Bastions"?
      1. -1
        18 October 2019 18: 14
        Quote: Piramidon
        Quote: inner enemy
        Well, tomahawks fly much further, which means their carriers Bastion will not get it, unfortunately.

        Where do you serve that you know in such detail all the performance characteristics and "Calibers" and "Tomahawks" and "Bastions"?


        Tomahawk Block IV 1600 km above 2400 km under 2004
      2. +2
        18 October 2019 21: 05
        Campaign on the couch! laughing wassat
    2. 0
      18 October 2019 19: 41
      Tomahawks have an imip 2 inertial guidance systems and jeepies. The bastion is mobile, although it has prepared positions for launching, but there is a certain set of them, and where they will go to shoot from is another question that the potential enemy still needs to disclose. If I know a lot of such positions on the eastern coast of Kamchatka. In the event of a conflict with a large naval group of the enemy, it will be like a duel between 2 rapier masters, someone will deceive someone and win.
      The bastion does not shoot from a clean field; it needs a position. And target designation from the outside.
      cool thing but there is a whole range of measures
      The racket is certainly cocky. That is yes. I'm talking about the video
    3. 0
      19 October 2019 05: 58
      Show at least one example where the Tomahawks were used on the ship ... this rocket has a different specialty, you compare warm to soft.
      1. 0
        19 October 2019 06: 54


        Quote: Rostovchanin
        Show at least one example where the Tomahawks were used on the ship ... this rocket has a different specialty, you compare warm to soft.
        1. 0
          19 October 2019 09: 16
          Currently, the anti-ship version of the ax is not in service.
          1. 0
            19 October 2019 09: 38
            Kssch is also not a member. Or Bet. A bunch of examples from the PCR Tomahawk
            1. 0
              19 October 2019 10: 48
              So the conversation just about the anti-ship missile began and the conclusion of the "expert" that Onyx would not reach the Tomahawk carrier, since it "flies further", and the fact that the TASM in the Tomahawk hull has half the range than Onyx, even if was armed. I pointed out that they do not have an anti-ship missile comparable to Onyx in their arsenal. Even if the TASM is still in service. The tomahawk today is intended only for stationary purposes, that's what my message was.
              1. 0
                19 October 2019 11: 00
                Comrade and meant tactical missiles, having which they do not need to enter the zone of defeat of the Bastion
        2. 0
          19 October 2019 09: 21
          This is the building from Tamagavka ... TASM with a head from Harpoon and a range of 450 km, was withdrawn from service at the beginning of 2000.
          1. 0
            19 October 2019 09: 37
            Quote: Rostovchanin
            This is the building from Tamagavka ... TASM with a head from Harpoon and a range of 450 km, was withdrawn from service at the beginning of 2000.

            Naturally, on the RCC put GOS from RCC. At Exoset and Otomat they are generally interchangeable.
            You asked for an example on the ships - their mass
      2. +1
        19 October 2019 09: 26
        Well, actually, I wrote about this. Ax shoot at stationary targets
  7. +1
    18 October 2019 17: 51
    Since the beginning of this year, the Russian Ministry of Defense has received the Onnx cruise missiles in service, and another 38 missiles are currently being transported to customers. This was announced during a single day of military acceptance by the general designer of NPO Mashinostroyeniya Alexander Dergachev.


    Or I don’t understand something, but earlier for such information ... what does all this mean?
  8. 0
    18 October 2019 18: 05
    Expensive, hard of course ... but how else to rave and fool beyond the hill to persuade?
    Already everyone tried, almost disarmed, squandered everything to ports ... everyone climbs, learns, impudes and pulls raking grabs !!!
    It’s necessary to admonish differently, specifically!
  9. +1
    18 October 2019 19: 21
    Complete control of the Black Sea to the Bosphorus. The construction of the NATO Navy facilities in this case will encounter certain difficulties. Will the Americans want to invest more in their allies to overcome this situation?
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    19 October 2019 09: 28
    Quote: Rostovchanin
    Show at least one example where the Tomahawks were used on the ship ... this rocket has a different specialty, you compare warm to soft.

    Tomahawk had a modification in the form of RCC, but it turned out quite so-so, and the Americans removed it from service.