Turkey introduced its analogue of the anti-aircraft missile system Tor

25
Turkey is preparing to produce its own short-range air defense system. According to officials, Hisar-A has been successfully tested.





The procurement department of the Turkish Ministry of Defense confirmed the readiness of the first local-made air defense and missile defense system. In parallel with statements of readiness, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and senior procurement officer of the Turkish Ministry of Defense Ismail Demir said that Ankara will place an order for mass production.

It is expected that the delivery of Hisar-A systems to the troops will begin in 2021. The system will be jointly launched by Aselsan, a military electronics company and rocket maker Roketsan.

Aselsan, the project’s general contractor, developed all the radar, command and control and communication systems under the Hisar-A program, and Roketsan acted as a subcontractor.

Hisar-A, according to manufacturers, "provides protection against all types of air targets thanks to the vertical launch of anti-missile systems." The complex includes a three-coordinate radar, a set of electro-optical sensors and a fire control system.

Analog "Thor"


In terms of tasks, the complex is comparable with the Russian Tor air defense system. It provides protection for important administrative and military facilities, including military bases, airports, seaports, covers military units during marching crossings. Hisar-A is designed to deal with helicopters and aircraft, UAVs, cruise missiles and air-to-ground missiles.

Hisar is a family of short-range and long-range ground and air-based missile systems developed by Aselsan and Roketsan since 2007. It consists of HİSAR-A and the medium-range missile defense system HİSAR-O. Hisar-O air defense systems should occupy a niche similar to the one occupied by the Russian C-350 complex.

Ankara hopes to export Hisar-A air defense systems after it becomes operational with the Turkish army.

Potential export markets are friendly states. Potential customers are Azerbaijan, Qatar, Pakistan and some Central Asian republics.

- emphasized one of the officials of the defense department in a commentary to the publication Defense News.


The main version of Hisar-A is based on the FNSS ACV-30 tracked chassis, equipped with four short-range missiles. Hisar-A uses KALKAN radar and an electro-optical / infrared (EO / IR) sensor system.

Minimum range: 2 km
Maximum range: 15 km
Minimum height: 30 meters
Maximum height: 5 km


HİSAR-O, in turn, is mounted on the Mercedes-Benz Zetros chassis.

Minimum range: 3 km
Maximum range: 25 + km
Minimum height: 50 meters
Maximum height: 15 km
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    16 October 2019 10: 59
    Turkey introduced its analogue of the anti-aircraft missile system Tor
    And then it dawned on the Turks. Again Gritsyuk all sold for pennies, all they knew.
    1. +1
      16 October 2019 11: 07
      Mavrikiy
      And then it dawned on the Turks. Again Gritsyuk all sold for pennies, all they knew.
      Lucky Russians. Not for a penny they sold everything laughing good
      My EVERYTHING, figuratively please understand. And then sometimes it horrifies me from my specifics, marginal entities. bully
      1. +3
        16 October 2019 12: 00
        Quote: Observer2014
        Mavrikiy
        And then it dawned on the Turks. Again Gritsyuk all sold for pennies, all they knew.
        Lucky Russians. Not for a penny they sold everything laughing good
        My EVERYTHING, figuratively please understand. And then jarred horribly at times from my specifics, marginal entities. bully
        I also have jars of liberastov, but you have to talk and tolerate omnipresent.
        On the eve of Poroshenko went on a two-day visit to the UAE, where the IDEX-2015 arms exhibition is taking place. “During the arms exhibition IDEX-2015, Ukraine signed about 20 contracts for the supply of weapons,” the Ukrainian leader reported at a press conference. He also announced the signing of several "very important agreements for the sale of military products Ukrainian defense industry for a few tens of millions of dollars"
        . It is able to sell a couple of complexes, why not, and if more and in return ?.
    2. +9
      16 October 2019 11: 09
      Before writing such news, site moderators need to study the characteristics of the Tor complex. This "Hisar-A" is not a complete analogue of the Tor complex? Especially in terms of target height! Turkey is far from Russia.
      1. +2
        16 October 2019 11: 19
        Quote: Thunderclock
        Especially in terms of target height! Turkey is far from Russia.
        good Yes, "Hisar-A" is not lying close to "Tor". It is clearly not enough against UAVs and cruise missiles. Namely, as the attack on Saudi Arabia has shown, at the moment they represent perhaps the most dangerous threat!
      2. +1
        16 October 2019 11: 29
        It meant that he has tasks similar to the "Torah", and not performance characteristics.
        1. +1
          16 October 2019 12: 56
          Well, can he "cut" tasks similar to the C - 400, what are the problems? What is he really capable of? Especially now, when Turkey is being drawn into an obscure war in the north of Syria and Iraq, and relations with the West have "cooled down greatly." By the way, the Germans blocked the supply of weapons and military equipment to the Turks, and the Mercedes chassis, although it seems to be not very military.
          1. +1
            16 October 2019 14: 09
            Turks need to support the national defense industry. Do not disperse your own specialized design bureaus and research institutes, motivating this with the fact that Russians have better weapons? So where can importozamestitsya, they are doing it. Which is quite rational.
            At this point, obviously, Hisar-A suits them. But if the situation changes, their preferences will also change.
            1. 0
              17 October 2019 10: 00
              Domestic manufacturers have to, but to go against the heavily armed enemy, having initially a weak weapon - is also excuse, not an option. Nobody needs losses and no result.
      3. +1
        16 October 2019 11: 56
        Quote: Thunderclock
        Before writing such news, site moderators need to study the characteristics of the Tor complex. This "Hisar-A" is not a complete analogue of the Tor complex? Especially in terms of target height! Turkey is far from Russia.

        Let's compare the performance characteristics.
        Hisar-A uses KALKAN radar and an electro-optical / infrared (EO / IR) sensor system.
        Minimum range: 2 km
        Maximum range: 15 km
        Minimum height: 30 meters

        Maximum height: 5 km

        HİSAR-O, in turn, is mounted on the Mercedes-Benz Zetros chassis.

        Minimum range: 3 km
        Maximum range: 25 + km
        Minimum height: 50 meters
        Maximum height: 15 km

        At Tor M2KM 16 raket.I there and there is a range of 15 km, but Tor M2KM height defeat 10 km, 5 km and not as in Hisar-A.
        Detection range, m 32000
        Detection angle, deg 0-32(32-64)
        Lesion area, m
        -by range
        -height
        -in exchange rate parameter
        1000-15000
        10-10000
        0-8000
        Target speed, m/s up to 700

        http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/tor-m2km/tor-m2km.shtml
        S-350 range of destruction is 150 km, height of destruction is 35 km. Hisar-O is a Turkish analogue of NASAMS air defense system judging by a missile similar to an air-to-air missile converted to air defense system and named TTX air defense system. (Height of destruction 15 km, range no more 60 km), that is an analog of the Buk-M2 and Buk-M3, rather than the C-350.
        9M96E with a mass of 333 kg has lesion boundaries in the range of 40 km, in height of 20 km.
        9M96E2 is much more interesting. It has a mass of 420 kg and has a weight of 24 kg warhead and range 120-150 km lesion.
        If the 48N6DM missile allows you to intercept highly maneuverable ballistic targets only to heights of 25-27 km, then 9M96E2 provides interception at an altitude of up to 35 km.
        The missile is equipped with transverse control engines, the blocks of which are close to the center of mass, which allows maneuvering with an overload of more than 20-25 units. at altitudes above 30 km (up to 65 units. at altitudes of up to 5 km). In the final section of the trajectory (at a speed of 700-800 m / s), it can maneuver with an overload of 20 units.

        https://pikabu.ru/story/pro_realnyie_vozmozhnosti_s400_i_zachem_nuzhna_s350_minutka_divannoy_analitiki_5460056
  2. +2
    16 October 2019 11: 06
    Thor's analogue is cool! Strong statement!
  3. +1
    16 October 2019 11: 14
    "Minimum height: 50 meters" Yes, at such a height, the helicopter will fly up to it lightly and spread it with the help of NARs.
  4. -5
    16 October 2019 11: 19
    As potential customers are considered Azerbaijan, Qatar, Pakistan and several Central Asian republics.
    It is doubtful about Qatar, but Azerbaijan, at the "request" of Erdogan, can run to buy on bent ones. But this is in the event that there is something to buy.
  5. +1
    16 October 2019 11: 29
    4 missiles vs 16, exactly analogOG
  6. 0
    16 October 2019 11: 33
    Air defense is good, and good air defense is even better.
    Returning to the question, do or buy?
    Specific guys think what needs to be done by themselves.
  7. +3
    16 October 2019 11: 38
    A complicated missile deployment system, however. There can be no talk of any launch. This complex is quite far from the TOP. And the characteristics, too.
  8. +1
    16 October 2019 12: 03
    the decay of the Soviet Union, it was necessary to take away from all the republics of blueprints of all military developments Soyuza.potomu that Russia is a legal successor SSSR.eto was a mistake.
  9. +2
    16 October 2019 12: 17
    Dashing troubles began. Over time, the Turks will get their hands on it. The main thing is that their engineers are working.
    1. -1
      16 October 2019 12: 43
      Quote: Michael42
      Down and Out trouble started Eventually the Turks nabyut their hands ...

      Well, if only that. Only here the performance characteristics of their systems - it's about something that was in the Soviet Union in the 70s, that is, 60s development. Oh, and for a long time they will stuff their hands.
  10. 0
    16 October 2019 12: 27
    And this is not an analogue of "Shell" will be? True, he is cooler. And the cannon ...

    Radar Type: Dual-Band Three-Axis
    Antenna type: HEADLIGHT
    Range: cm/mm (tracking channel) and cm (detection channel)[1]
    Azimuth of view (detection / tracking): (from 0 to 82) [2] / 45 degrees (360 due to mechanical rotation)
    Viewing angle (detection / tracking): (from 0 to 82) [2] / 45 degrees
    Range (EPR 2 m²) (detection / tracking): 36/30 km[3]
    Optoelectronic tracking system: yes
    Field of view: 1,8 × 2,7 degrees
    Modes: Auto / Manual
    Distance: 18 km
    Missile weapons (57E6E)
    Type: two-stage supersonic solid propellant
    Guidance: radio command
    Speed ​​(maximum / average at a distance of 18 km): 1300/700 m/s[4]
    Maximum target speed: 1000 m/s
    Range to target: 1,2 km - 20 km
    Target altitude: 15 m - 15 km
    Length: 3,2 m
    Caliber: 170/90 mm[5]
    Weight (without / with TPK): 74,5 / 94 kg
    Warhead type: rod
    Warhead weight: 20 kg
    Mass of explosive warhead: 5,5 kg
    1. 0
      16 October 2019 16: 28
      Who is cooler and what?
      1. +1
        16 October 2019 16: 33
        The shell is cooler, everyone. Height, range, on the move, ammunition, guns availability.
    2. +1
      16 October 2019 21: 22
      A very great value of "Pantsir-C1" is that it detects drones and other inconspicuous targets with image intensifier tubes = from 2 cm2 at a distance of 3,6 km in free space ...
  11. +1
    17 October 2019 09: 12
    What analogue is this, neither in terms of the number of target channels, nor in the number of missiles themselves, nor in the height of target destruction, nor in terms of parameters, nor in the possibility of firing in motion (and many more ...) ...
  12. 0
    11 May 2020 12: 39
    And what principle of guidance is not described in the article for full comparison with the TOP.