Military Review

Mikhalkov in "Besogon" talks about the unleashed fake war

27
A distinctive feature of modern media space is the creation and distribution of a large number of so-called fake News. The abundance of fake messages, which are often disguised as news, has recently captured not only Western countries, it has become part of life and Russian society.


Mikhalkov in "Besogon" talks about the unleashed fake war

Powell with test tube at UN Security Council meeting


Director Nikita Mikhalkov in the new issue of the Besogon TV program believes that we can already speak with confidence about the “international fake disease” that has hit the modern world.

The reaction of the girl in France to the “blow” with a balloon, the case of Evgenia Nikitina, in whose disability they doubted, the exposure of the “White Helmets” are all indicative examples of the fake news epidemic that the author of the program cites. According to Mikhalkov, in this way economic and political ideologists use ordinary people in their interests and develop public spaces. A false fraud sometimes resolves geopolitical issues, which can be followed by bombing, the introduction of troops, and sanctions. The example of Colin Powell’s test tube is still well-known, moreover, as one of the symbols of what might follow the throwing of false data. "Fake" news becomes an occasion for the commission of certain illegal actions.

Why, according to Mikhalkov, the use of false messages and provocations is by no means a new phenomenon?

27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. evgic
    evgic 10 October 2019 21: 24
    +5
    Director Nikita Mikhalkov in the new issue of the Besogon TV program believes that we can already speak with confidence about the “international fake disease” that has hit the modern world.
    Cool. The creator of fake movies talks about fake news.
    1. Avior
      Avior 10 October 2019 21: 43
      +4
      Specialist. With understanding, he argues .....
    2. Siberian54
      Siberian54 11 October 2019 04: 11
      +2
      Cinema and fiction (that is, fake!) So good, the actor and director reasoned quite professionally.
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 11 October 2019 05: 18
        0
        There is such a film "Not the most successful day", and so, in this film Nikita
        revealed his whole essence ....
      2. evgic
        evgic 11 October 2019 10: 55
        0
        She can take off a fake about her mom’s sexual relations with a donkey, I won’t say a word. And to plop into the face with the stools of your sick imagination to millions of war veterans and their relatives is, to put it mildly, a bad movie. As the saying goes, it was worth a goat fucking once ...
  2. lwxx
    lwxx 10 October 2019 21: 25
    +7
    Mikhalkov has a clear split personality. On TV, like voicing the right thoughts, well, almost always. And the movie removes clearly the opposite of its statements. Probably on TV they pay less than for libel in the movies.
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 10 October 2019 21: 59
      +5
      Quote: lwxx
      Mikhalkov has a clear split personality. On TV, like voicing the right thoughts, well, almost always. And the movie removes clearly the opposite of its statements. Probably on TV they pay less than for libel in the movies.

      I would say personality disorder .. Filmed films for the sake of Oscars and awards .. then the budget mastered the last films of the city .. rare. One of his personality wants the truth, but at the same time befriend the authorities .. and, accordingly, the truth is crooked and unsaid, another person stands up for justice, but justice is understood in a peculiar way .. especially with a flashing light when you rush around Moscow, and half of Moscow is in a traffic jam because of you worth .. the third person is trying to sit on two chairs and ours and yours, the father was a communist, the son is inclined to the monarchy .. In general, a "multifaceted" person .. but the edges are all sharpened for personal convenience and benefit. Although it must be admitted, the actor was good in his youth and films at first shot excellent .. But then something went wrong .. Many of the problems that he raises in his programs are relevant and he seems to be doing everything right, but halfway, somehow, bypassing the true culprits and sharp corners ..
      The main property of Sergei Mikhalkov was conformism, combined with cynicism. Skill and desire to serve the authorities (by the way, the Mikhalkov’s family comes from bedding of Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich, maybe it’s written on the family ...). Any power. Stalin. Brezhnev. Putin's

      This is said about the father, but also approaches his son ..
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. WIKI
        WIKI 11 October 2019 01: 47
        0
        Quote: Svarog
        Many of the problems that he raises in his programs are relevant and seems to be doing everything right, but half as much, bypassing the true culprits and sharp corners ..

        Such people will always exist successfully under any regime, and will never tell us the truth if their well-being is affected. That would not get into the prosak, spinning like a louse on ....
      3. Pessimist22
        Pessimist22 11 October 2019 05: 45
        +1
        Let about his uncle Misha who served in the SS film remove.
    2. Prisoner
      Prisoner 11 October 2019 00: 03
      +1
      Artists, filmmakers and the like have a chic excuse - "we see it this way." winked If rocket men, pilots, tankers, artillerymen and intelligence had such an excuse ... laughing Politicians would be afraid to fart. laughing laughing laughing
      1. ProkletyiPirat
        ProkletyiPirat 11 October 2019 00: 21
        -1
        Well, yes, exactly the opposite is true in the world, politicians "we see it this way", and the rest are afraid to fart. laughing
    3. The comment was deleted.
  3. Mcar
    Mcar 10 October 2019 21: 34
    +3
    Why, according to Mikhalkov, the use of false messages and provocations is by no means a new phenomenon?

    Still new! It is recalled as one provocateur falsely reported that in WWII fighters were thrown into battle with cuttings from shovels. And it doesn’t matter that it was an artistic image, not a documentary.
    1. Victoria-V
      Victoria-V 11 October 2019 03: 54
      0
      - Can i ask you? What will happen to our heroes next? - one mass man could not resist, asked Mikhalkov. - What fate awaits us?
      “The black infantry will be thrown into battle,” Nikita Sergeyevich explained. - Instead of weapons, they will give shank cuttings. Your heroes will go directly to the German infantry. You will all perish. But the Germans themselves will be shocked by how the Soviet state is scattered by people and does not put human life into anything. The Germans will not understand such madness!
  4. sagitch
    sagitch 10 October 2019 21: 36
    +6
    I never watch his performances, the director himself imagines himself a genius of politics ...
    1. Svarog
      Svarog 10 October 2019 22: 19
      -3
      Quote: sagitch
      I never watch his performances, the director himself imagines himself a genius of politics ...

      He has interesting issues ... about how villages die out in Russia .. but die out thanks to the power that he defends .. it turns out hypocrisy .. Or about the Chinese threat, which is also very interesting and correct, and a reasonable transfer has turned out .. but again, long ago it was .. apparently corrected his views from the presidential administration ..
      1. Nycomed
        Nycomed 10 October 2019 22: 39
        +2
        I watched a movie about endangered villages ... Talented, what can I say. But, if he had mentioned, in this film, that he owns vineyards in Italy ...
  5. fruit_cake
    fruit_cake 10 October 2019 21: 50
    +4
    It was not in vain that Lenin spoke about "intellectuals servants of capital", a clear example of such a specimen, when changing direction, he immediately changes his shoes and begins to expose fakes, but before he himself shot entire fake films
  6. aries2200
    aries2200 10 October 2019 22: 20
    +3
    master ................ with Kholuy-Lizoblyudsky inclinations, then ass licked Eltsin ... now Volodya licks ...
  7. Nycomed
    Nycomed 10 October 2019 22: 35
    -1
    That's when I shot wonderful films based on Russian classics or "Five Evenings", yes - MASTER. And when the creator of the "fake" "Citadel" begins to talk about "fakes", then this is completely different.
  8. Mcar
    Mcar 10 October 2019 22: 35
    -2
    From ~ 11th minute Mikhalkov, voluntarily or involuntarily, himself produces a fake. Maybe he doesn’t know that the head is not just for eating it?

    On the screen it is:
    Therefore, for the time being, I have no reason to doubt that the London bombings on January 24, 1885 handiwork of Russia. Everyone knows that the official Russians does not back down to any means, if only they lead to the goal.


    1. Between the second and first sentences the whole article. But this is a trifle, although this can not be quoted.

    2. By Russia, Engels means the official Russia — the tsarist regime, and not the bastard plowman over the plow and not exhausted by the overwork of the worker in rags.

    3. The maxim about portraits of Marx, Engels, Lenin at the May and October holidays is not at all appropriate. It was not in tsarist Russia, but in the Union Soviet Socialist Republics.

    4. And finally, what was discussed before such a "creepy" quote:


    Friedrich Engels

    Published in the journal Die Neue Zeit No. 1, January 1885, and in the book: K. Marx. "Das Elend der Philosophie." Stuttgart, 1885

    Published according to the text of the German edition of 1892.

    German translation

    IMPERIAL RUSSIAN VALID SECRET DYNAMITE ADVISERS [211]

    Everyone knows that the Russian government is using all means to conclude agreements with the West European states on the extradition of Russian emigrant revolutionaries.

    Everyone also knows that it is important for this government to first achieve such an agreement with England.

    Everyone knows, finally, that the official Russians retreat before any means, if only they lead to the goal.

    So, on January 13, 1885, Bismarck concludes an agreement with Russia, according to which every Russian political emigrant should be extradited as soon as Russia decides to indict him as a possible regicide or dynamite [212].

    January 15th, Ms. Olga Novikova, the same Ms. Novikova, who in 1877 and 1878. before the Turkish war and during it so brilliantly held noble Mr. Gladstone in the interests of Russia, published an appeal to England in the Pall Mall Gazette [213]. In this appeal, England is urged not to allow people like Hartman, Kropotkin and Stepnyak to conspire on English territory “in order to kill us in Russia,” now that dynamite is about to explode under the feet of the British themselves. Is it not the same Russia that demands of England in relation to the Russian revolutionaries, which England herself must now demand of America with respect to irish dynamites?

    On the morning of January 24, the Prussian-Russian agreement is published in London.

    And on January 24, at 2 p.m. for a quarter of an hour, three dynamite explosions take place in London, which produce more devastation than all the previous explosions that you have taken, and injure at least seven, and according to other sources, eighteen people.

    These explosions arrived just in time too, so as not to raise the question: who are they in favor of? Who is most interested in these, in other respects, aimless, not directed against anyone in particular, terrifying explosions, the victims of which fell not only the lower ranks of the police and the bourgeois, but also the workers, their wives and children? Who! Those several irishwho are driven to despair by the cruelty of the English government, especially during their imprisonment, and who are suspected of having put dynamite? Or same Russian government, which cannot achieve its goal - an extradition agreement - without exerting completely exceptional pressure on the British government and the English people, pressure that could lead public opinion in England into a state of blind rage against dynamites?

    When the Polish emigrants, with very few exceptions, did not want to agree that, in accordance with the desire of Russian diplomacy and the police, to fake Russian paper money, the Russian government sent agents abroad, including the state adviser Kamensky, to encourage this emigrants, and when this failed, Messrs. Kamensky and the company themselves had to tackle fake Russian paper money. All this is described in detail in the brochure "Counterfeiters or Agents of the Russian Government." Geneva. G. Georg. 1875 [214]. - The Swiss, London, and probably also the Paris police can tell you something about how, in pursuit of Russian counterfeiters, it, as a rule, came up against people whose persecution the Russian embassy stubbornly rejected.

    About what can do official Russia in order to eliminate the people who are bothering her with poison, dagger, etc., the history of the Balkan Peninsula over the past hundred years gives enough examples. I will only refer to the famous book: Elias Reno. "History of the Danube principalities", Paris, 1855 [215]. Russian diplomacy constantly has at its disposal all kinds of agents, including those whose services are used for all kinds of meannesses and which they then deny.

    Therefore, for the time being, I have no reason to doubt that the London bombings on January 24, 1885, were the work of Russia. It is possible that the dynamite was laid by Irish hands, but it is more than likely that they were sent by the Russian head and Russian money.

    Way to fight Russian revolutionaries dictated by forced circumstances, the actions of their opponents. For the means they use, these revolutionaries are accountable to their people and history. But those gentlemen who unnecessarily school mock this struggle in Western Europe, try to reduce the revolution to the level of Shindergannes, direct their weapons not even against real enemies, but against the public in general - these gentlemen are by no means followers or allies of the Russian revolution , and her worst enemies. Since it turned out that besides official Russia no one is interested in the success of these feats, the question is only about which of these gentlemen is involuntary and who is a voluntary, paid agent of Russian tsarism. London, January 25, 1885

    https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=134418&p=60


    Who did not understand, on the fingers.
    The tsarist government put pressure on London so that he would not "conspire" the Russian revolutionaries (names are attached). The tsarist regime managed to conclude an agreement with Germany on the extradition of the revolutionaries. On the day this agreement was published, there were terrorist attacks (a terrorist attack is not a communist method, but what happened was what happened). Engels, referring to examples of what tsarist Russia is capable of, rightly assumes that this is the work of the Irish, but at the instigation of tsarist agents. All.

    What did you want, Nikita Sergeevich? For Engels to support the tsarist government?
  9. Prisoner
    Prisoner 11 October 2019 00: 06
    +2
    The very first thing that comes to mind is set fire to the Reichstag by the German Nazis, who was hanged on Dimitrov. If you dig deeper, there is certainly more. It’s just that in those days there was no Internet. winked
  10. Tiger
    Tiger 11 October 2019 00: 52
    0
    ! No matter the article, the comments are just mud! People, are you here from where? Like a bunch of mongrels, you flock in a flock, hiss, growl, drool ... And it's not so, and it's bad, and this and that thief ... and Putin are to blame! ))). Textures zero, some guesses and general phrases. Hiley Likely in Runet! The feeling that they paid and the task gave the power of Russia to scold and spread rot how much in vain ?! You yourself pay attention to the comments of the last couple of months! ... In any question there is who is for and who is against. But, for the sake of truth, truth and a better future, they discuss it and find understanding in the way out, in solutions to current problems! And then, all of a sudden, once a gang of empty breeds flies up and clogs a branch with baby talk ... the power is to blame, personally the GDP and all-all-all those who support the power! ))) It's funny! Go, damn it, grow something, at least feed someone with bread, head a startup, plant a bribe taker, amend the law, help a deputy or plant a tree! .. Why is this rubbish to drive here?
    1. Victoria-V
      Victoria-V 11 October 2019 04: 04
      +2
      It seems to me the opposite. The number of hat-takers and fans of military cartoons has increased to 90%.
    2. savage1976
      savage1976 11 October 2019 07: 09
      0
      I completely agree with you. Since GDP is personally to blame for all the troubles of Russia, then every parent is personally to blame for the fact that his family has low incomes, no housing, no cars, a child got a deuce or grown children committed a crime. So it is necessary to plant both the criminal and the parents. But now both you and me will zamusutut along the way.))
  11. nikvic46
    nikvic46 11 October 2019 06: 30
    +2
    It’s just that everyone needs to get closer to reality. A lot of talk and a little matter. Our grandchildren have lost a sense of justice. The boys are dipped in the toilet, and not a single boy will stand up for it. We will think about everything and what will happen next. affairs. And then a flash, and only then you think it over.
  12. Amateur
    Amateur 11 October 2019 07: 26
    -2

    Very similar to "Besogon". Only Mikhalkov has a nasty voice. wassat
  13. Tiger
    Tiger 11 October 2019 15: 18
    0
    Quote: savage1976
    I completely agree with you. Since GDP is personally to blame for all the troubles of Russia, then every parent is personally to blame for the fact that his family has low incomes, no housing, no cars, a child got a deuce or grown children committed a crime.

    100 +!