Napoleon's mistakes. The invisible front of World War II 1812 year

29

In full armor


“Of course, it helped us a lot that we always knew the intentions of your emperor from his own dispatches. During the last operations, there were great discontent in the country, and we managed to capture a lot of dispatches,

- in approximately the same way Emperor Alexander I tried to console the French Marshal Etienne MacDonald in 1812


Emperor Alexander I




When the military leader asked Alexander I about the sources of information about the codes, hinting that the Russians had just stolen the keys, the emperor exclaimed:
“Not at all! I give you my word of honor that nothing like this has happened. We just decrypted them. ”


This conversation, cited by the American historian Fletcher Pratt, very eloquently shows what role Russian cryptographers played in the victory over the most powerful army in the world.

Together with Napoleonic France, Russia entered the eve of war already with a sufficiently developed cryptographic service. In the newly formed Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1802, three secret expeditions were created, which were later renamed branches. In the first two, digital, they were engaged in encryption and decryption, and in the third they looked through correspondence. Civil or “unclassified” expeditions were responsible for contacts with Asia (1 expedition), correspondence with the Tsaregrad mission (2 expedition), issuing foreign passports, “correspondence in French with ministers” (3 expedition), as well as dealt with notes and other correspondence from foreign ambassadors (4 expedition). The protagonist in the secret work of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was the Head of the Chancellery, which, since 1809, was led by Andrei Andreevich Gervais, who previously headed the first digital expedition.


Alexander Vorontsov, 1-th Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Empire


As in France, the special services of the Russian Empire used two types of ciphers, differing in the level of cryptographic strength - general and individual. The former were intended for routine work with several recipients at once, usually within a country or region. And individual ciphers were for communication with officials of the highest government levels. In their complexity, such cryptographic systems were not a cut above the French ones, but their security was incomparably better organized - dispatches very rarely fell into the hands of the enemy. At the same time, it is worth remembering that cryptographers left the manual writing of encoded texts - the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had then-modern lithography, which allowed printing. But cryptographically secure dispatches had to be delivered to the addressees somehow. This was previously taken care of by Emperor Paul I, when on December 12 of the 1796 of the year 13 he established the Feldeger Corps, which initially consisted of one officer and the XNUMX courier. Over time, the staff of specialists of this department will expand significantly, and the functionality will include delivery of correspondence not only to recipients in Russia, but also abroad. In wartime, it was the courier who provided uninterrupted and expeditious delivery of especially important documents from the main apartment of Emperor Alexander I.

At the same time as the courier service in Russia, the Higher Military Police appeared, which largely performed counterintelligence functions in the army. It was the specialists of this unit who provided protection for the information exchanged between the highest military and political ranks. In this case, several approaches were used. First of all, with every suspicion of discrediting or replacing an agent, it was supposed to change “tsifiri” to new ones. When sending particularly important dispatches, the Higher Military Police demanded to send at least three copies with three different couriers on different routes, which practically guaranteed protection from interceptions. In the case of extreme urgency when sending letters, when it was impossible to use encryption, writing was allowed in sympathetic ink, but strictly only by those “which will be delivered from the Main Apartment”.


Alexey Voeikov

Among the measures that allowed Russia to successfully confront the Napoleonic army on an invisible front, the creation of the Ministry of War in February 1812, which included the Special Chancellery, can be highlighted. The head of the office, which actually became the first of its kind foreign intelligence agency, was Alexey Voeikov, who began his career as an orderly for Alexander Suvorov. Even before the war, Alexander Ivanovich Chernyshev was the most important Russian intelligence agent in Paris - he not only successfully recruited employees of the French Foreign Ministry, but managed to supply Napoleon himself with fake Russian cards. This seriously slowed the way for the French to Moscow.

Napoleon's mistakes. The invisible front of World War II 1812 year

Alexander Chernyshev



Charles Talleyrand


In cryptographic terms, France was a fairly easy object of study for the Russian special services - domestic decoders and perlustrators have been reading the secret correspondence of the French since the middle of the 1808th century. At the same time, Napoleon himself was surrounded by agents supplying the Russian imperial court with information of strategic importance. One of these was Foreign Minister Charles Talleyrand, who offered his services to Alexander I back in XNUMX. Talleyrand leaked everything - the country's internal and external affairs, the combat readiness and size of the army, as well as the date of the attack on Russia. IN historical There is little information available about whether the French Foreign Minister disclosed decryption keys to Russian messengers, but the likelihood of this was high. Still, Talleyrand had access to encryption of the entire diplomatic mail of France and could share the keys with Alexander I for an acceptable fee. However, as soon as the corrupt Frenchman offered his services to Austria (and even raised prices to the skies), the Russians gradually curtailed contacts with him.

Candidate of technical sciences, associate professor of the MIREA department Dmitry Larin in one of his articles cites words that very well describe Talleyrand:
“The main quality of money is its quantity.”


In France, the name Talleyrand is still associated with corruption, greed and unprincipledness.

The whole range of special services allowed Russia to successfully prepare for Napoleon's invasion and always be several steps ahead of the enemy.

Napoleon misses the initiative


The emperor of France paradoxically ignored the cryptographic service in the army. One of the historians of France wrote:
“This military genius most definitely did not attach much importance to cryptography, although in these matters he was not a completely limited person, as some historians have characterized him”
.

At the same time, Napoleon was definitely let down by an arrogant attitude towards the Russian people - he seriously believed that his codes could not be revealed to the backward eastern neighbors.

At the same time, intelligence agencies under the emperor were in the prime of their influence. In 1796, the Secret Bureau was established under the leadership of Jean Landreux. The department had many branches throughout Europe, only in Russia it was not possible to create anything like this. Napoleon also had his “Black Cabinets” under the supervision of Antoine Lavalette, Chief of Post. This Lavalette is worthy of special mention. The fact is that with the restoration of the Bourbons, the former head of the post and all the censorship of France, of course, decided to execute. And just the day before, a spouse came to the unfortunate woman who exchanged dresses with Lavalet and he left the prison unharmed in a woman’s robe. Of course, no one beheaded his wife, but they did not let her out of the prison either - she went crazy in prison.

But back to Napoleon's cryptographers, who used several ciphers in their practice. The simplest were intended for the exchange of information between small army units, and the so-called Small and Large Emperor codes were used to connect Napoleon with important military leaders. Needless to say, Russian cryptanalysts read the entire correspondence of the French emperor? This was largely helped by the negligence with which the dispatches were encrypted in the army. Often in the intercepted French documents only the most important content was encrypted, the rest was written in clear text, which greatly simplified the "hacking" of the encoding. And in the Moscow fire, Napoleon’s keys to ciphers were burnt out altogether, so for some time I also had to use plain text. The stretched communications of the French troops became a real scourge for Napoleon's correspondence to France. Partisans and flying detachments of Russian hussars intercepted a considerable part of letters from the military leadership to their homeland and controlled units. One of the most effective “interceptors” was Denis Davydov, who with enviable regularity sent to the center a report on the deployment of French troops, their strength and leadership plans.


Denis Davydov


The information war unleashed by the Russians proved effective against Napoleon. So, with the French attack on Russia, the emperor was immediately declared outside the church and called the Antichrist. This effectively closed off all attempts by the French to persuade the local population to their side and made it impossible to recruit spies. Even for the craziest money, it was not possible to find scouts who would agree to infiltrate Moscow or Petersburg.

“The emperor complained all the time that he could not obtain information about what was happening in Russia. And in fact, nothing came to us from there; not a single secret agent dared to get there. For no money it was impossible to find a person who would agree to go to Petersburg or get into the Russian army. The only enemy troops we came into contact with were Cossacks; no matter how much the emperor wanted to get a few prisoners in order to get any information about the army from them, we were not able to capture the prisoners with hassles ... And since no spy dared to get into the location of the Russian army, we did not know what was going on, and the emperor was devoid of any information ”
,
- wrote in his memoirs the French diplomat Arman Kolenkur.

More or less, it was possible to agree on the delivery of secret dispatches to France - on average, the price for such a trip was 2500 francs.

In the end I will give an example of the successful interception and decryption of the order of the Marshal of the Empire, Louis Bertier, to one of his generals 5 on October 1812. Such a valuable letter (it spoke about the redeployment of all equipment and equipment of the army on the Mozhaisk road) was taken with a fight by a detachment of Colonel Kudashev. Kutuzov instantly stopped the pursuit of the remnants of the unfinished units of Marshal Murat and blocked the Kaluga road. This blocked the French road to the south, and they were forced to retreat along the Smolensk road. And this area was previously plundered and devastated by them ...
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    11 October 2019 19: 08
    Thank you wonderful article
    1. -3
      12 October 2019 00: 22
      Join us!
      I recommend reading two excellent articles on Warhead.su about the partisan movement in that war:
      https://warhead.su/2019/08/30/kak-vystrugat-dubinu-narodnoy-voyny
      https://warhead.su/2019/09/05/letuchie-otryady-russkie-partizany-v-1813-godu
      It is a pity that they did not go to VO. It would be necessary to bring the author here.
  2. +7
    11 October 2019 19: 33
    Interesting. Always interested in intelligence activities.
    The author, but can you find out about the sources underlying the article? Is this probably some kind of documents?
    1. +2
      11 October 2019 21: 09
      There are no special documents on this subject. As a rule, everyone is guided by Wikipedia. It is difficult to get serious documents: I mean archives, military journals.
      1. +5
        11 October 2019 21: 11
        I got what you mean.
        But, by the way, I met on the Internet combat magazines a couple of corps of this era. Rolled up in pdf format
    2. +2
      12 October 2019 14: 17
      No, of course, I have no access to archival documents. It uses numerous publications by Dmitry Larin, a famous cryptography historian from MIREA. Also books by Vadim Grebennikov "Cryptology and Secret Communication", Soboleva Tatiana "The History of Ciphering in Russia" and Vladlen Izmozik "Black Cabinets" The History of Russian Perlustration. XVIII - early XX century. This is the main literature.
      1. +1
        16 October 2019 15: 34
        Thank. The article turned out to be very interesting, but the fact that this information is from available sources does not detract from your merits.
  3. +2
    11 October 2019 19: 45
    Alexander the First has undeniable merits to the Motherland! It is very disappointing that such lies Historians like Ponosenkov lied to him lately and invented all sorts of nasty things!
    1. +3
      11 October 2019 21: 44
      Quote: Veronika Polyakova
      Alexander the First has undeniable merits to the Motherland! It is very disappointing that such lies Historians like Ponosenkov lied to him lately and invented all sorts of nasty things!

      An ambiguous figure: the victory in the Patriotic War of 1812 is definitely attributed to his merits. But he did not work for the blessed. Following the results of the Victory over the invasion of the French, the Russian people had the right to wait for their will. But he did not give it: it shot in 1917.
      1. +1
        12 October 2019 00: 17
        Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
        An ambiguous figure: the victory in the Patriotic War of 1812 is definitely attributed to his merits. But he did not work for the blessed. Following the results of the Victory over the invasion of the French, the Russian people had the right to wait for their will. But he did not give it: it shot in 1917.

        "Shot" much earlier, on December 14 (26), 1825 ... In 1917, this shot "hit the target." Purely my opinion ...
        1. +1
          12 October 2019 00: 39
          Quote: Petrograd
          Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
          An ambiguous figure: the victory in the Patriotic War of 1812 is definitely attributed to his merits. But he did not work for the blessed. Following the results of the Victory over the invasion of the French, the Russian people had the right to wait for their will. But he did not give it: it shot in 1917.

          "Shot" much earlier, on December 14 (26), 1825 ... In 1917, this shot "hit the target." Purely my opinion ...

          In 1825 there was only an attempt by a group of officers to carry out a coup; they did not have a clear political and economic program. If we simulate the emancipation of the peasants for 1812-1815, then we have an increase in capitalist production starting not from 1862, but earlier, respectively, a reform similar to Stolypin also occurred earlier, and we approached the First World War with an economic base like Germany did: would revolution, civil war. All of World History would take a different path.
          1. 0
            12 October 2019 01: 33
            I agree with you, the Decembrists were more romantic than pragmatists. Maybe it's for the best that there is no "if only" in History ...
            1. 0
              15 October 2019 00: 03
              Subsequent investigations showed that most of these "romantics" had mortgaged estates, and they owed not to the state, but to the Crown, that is, personally to the emperor. Hence the attraction to the republic. It was just that the debts were scrapped.
              1. 0
                15 October 2019 00: 15
                Quote: boriz
                Subsequent investigations showed that most of these "romantics" had mortgaged estates, and they owed not to the state, but to the Crown, that is, personally to the emperor. Hence the attraction to the republic. It was just that the debts were scrapped.

                I am familiar with this "version" - only this investigation on RenTV took place, and there soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooowing and investigating sometimes ...
    2. +1
      13 October 2019 22: 38
      I don’t see any merit. Especially compared to Paul. Alexander was a typical liberal trepach. He gathered with his friends and discussed how to equip Russia. On this, the entire arrangement ended. In fact, we have:
      1. Serfdom as it was, and remains. Even after 1812, which led to numerous peasant riots.
      2. The noble freemen and the arbitrariness of the landowners both existed and remained. The same embezzlement and bureaucracy.
      3. Organized two lost wars (1805 and 1807) and one victorious.
      4. Gigantic budget deficits and frantic inflation, due to preparations for the third war. The thirst for revenge overshadowed all reasonable considerations. Speransky, who was trying to put things in order, was simply dismissed.
      5. Merit in the victory of 1812 is not visible at all. First, he "pulled up" Baron Ful with his crazy plan, then he dropped everything and left without even appointing a commander in chief. Then the impressive throwing of our commanders. In general, the main merit in the victory of 1812 belongs to Barclay de Tolly. The only sensible general with an understanding of strategy. Therefore, he did not "fit in" and retired after Borodino.
      6. But show off on the international stage - yes, it's about Alexander! The king of the country, where millions of slaves are fighting for the liberation of all peoples from the yoke of Napoleon!
      1. 0
        14 October 2019 12: 39
        Quote: Tavrik
        Merit in the victory of 1812 is not visible at all. First he "pulled up" Baron Ful with his crazy plan, then he dropped everything and left without even appointing a commander in chief

        It is believed that the Pfulevsky (Drissky) camp, as well as its entire plan, were elements of the strategic misinformation of the enemy.
        Why appoint a "commander-in-chief" if he was actually Mikhail Bogdanovich Barclay de Tolly, the Minister of War of the Empire? When Kutuzov was needed, he was appointed.
        1. +1
          14 October 2019 12: 47
          Sly plans for misinformation came up with hindsight. In fact, there was confusion and misunderstanding of what to do next. Either give a battle, or defend in the camp, or retreat to unite the armies. Only Barclay understood the correct procedure. And he began to implement it, for which he collected the whole “bouquet” of indignation both “from below” and “from above”.
          "Minister of War" and "commander-in-chief" were not identical concepts at that time. In addition, Bagration was produced a little earlier than Barclay. Those. Bagration had to obey the younger. Plus high conceit. And conflicts began on the basis of different views on the conduct of the war ...
    3. +1
      13 October 2019 23: 11
      The "historian" Ponasenkov is not spoken out loud in decent society. Not decent. wink
      Read serious researchers. But be prepared for the fact that at some points their opinions coincide.
  4. +1
    11 October 2019 22: 01
    Alexey Voeikov at the time of the company in 1812 was the commander of the team of huntsmen.
    1. 0
      11 October 2019 23: 00
      I am surprised why in Soviet times, and even then, all these glorious deeds were hushed up, and at school, and even in the famous film "War and Peace", the Emperor and all military leaders, excluding Kutuzov and Bogration, are represented, to put it mildly, by not very smart people.
      1. +1
        13 October 2019 22: 58
        In Soviet times, they wrote about how Chernyshov skillfully collected intelligence. Moreover, the agents were recruited even before him, the diplomat Jacobi. Then the contacts were transferred to Chernyshov. About the creation of Russian military intelligence by Barclay was published in the magazine Rodina in 1991 or 92, I don't remember exactly ..
        In general, the higher, the less there were "smart" ones. Alexander needed not smart ones, but devotees. In order not to get a "snuff box in the temple". Therefore, in 1812, they rushed about, I think who to appoint the commander ... Not because of a good life, they appointed Kutuzov.
        1. 0
          13 October 2019 23: 45
          The ruler always and at all times needs loyal people, otherwise he may lose power in one minute. However, it is very difficult to find both smart and loyal people at the same time. This is the truth of life.
  5. +4
    11 October 2019 23: 23
    Great article, Eugene.
    We are waiting for the following materials. smile hi
  6. 0
    13 October 2019 04: 52
    Lt. Col. Liprandi is not mentioned, but in vain ...
  7. 0
    13 October 2019 10: 52
    Until now, it was believed that the Great Patriotic War was won by the Stirlitz, and the soldier in the trench ate vodka, and "Smuglyanka" on the harp brynkal. And the legs are where they grow from! Know, not only frost is strong Rosseya!
  8. 0
    13 October 2019 23: 04
    Quote: Ezekiel 25-17
    In 1825 there was only an attempt by a group of officers to carry out a coup; they did not have a clear political and economic program.

    All these were the consequences of the campaigns of 1813-1814. Our peasants in gray greatcoats and the small local nobility with the chief officer's epaulettes looked at how "the European peoples" suffer "under the yoke of Napoleon." And they wondered why in Europe under the "Antichrist Buonapartie" the standard of living is much higher than in Russia under the tsar-father? "So you goofs went on a foreign tour" (C) smile
  9. 0
    14 October 2019 12: 18
    When the military leader asked Alexander I about the sources of information about the ciphers, hinting that the Russians had simply stole the keys ...

    Like it's something bad ...
    When sending particularly important dispatches, the Higher Military Police demanded to send at least three copies with three different couriers on different routes, which practically guaranteed protection against intercepts

    Ehe-heh ... Could after all ... It would seem - develop, improve, use all the achievements of the science of that time. Where did all this go by 1914 (the death of Samsonov’s army)? Yes, and in the RNE, the incompetence of the higher command staff in terms of providing the AHTF was already clearly visible ... and not only in it.
  10. 0
    14 October 2019 14: 50
    Wonderful historical research! They are read in one breath and with pleasure. most beautiful article. What a pity that this is very little to see.
  11. 0
    1 November 2019 23: 06
    Regarding the last paragraph of the article: - How to Mozhaiskaya road? Slip of the pen? Maybe all the same to Kaluga?