Lugansk "Shushpantser" turned out to be a vehicle for ensuring crossing "Holder"

On October 7 this year, a military parade was held in Lugansk on the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the formation of the Lugansk People’s Republic. As well as tanks, BMP and armored personnel carriers, already familiar to us from participating in battles, the Lugansk military showed other equipment of their own production. A photograph of an engineering machine, dubbed “shushpanzer” from commentators, was published by Anna News.




The photograph shown aroused unexpected interest among numerous visitors to the site who expressed the most unexpected assumptions, even to the extent that this is a new development by the Russian military, which was brought to Lugansk by the North Wind. However, everything turned out to be much more banal and simpler - the photo shows the "Holder" crossing support machine (MOS), developed at the beginning of the 90's on the basis of the PTS-3, manufactured at the Lugansk diesel locomotive plant.

According to available information, the development of the MOSFET was completed in the 1992 year, but the machine did not go into the series, as claimed, due to the collapse of the Soviet Union. As conceived by the designers, this engineering machine was supposed to provide equipment for crossings over water barriers. To do this, it was equipped with an excavator bucket, bulldozer equipment, a winch and motor drills. MOS has a fully armored hull, while, like the PTS-3, it has maintained buoyancy.

The machine, as previously mentioned, was not mass-produced, therefore, apparently, the Lugansk People’s Police restored one of the previously issued copies and adopted it.

Lugansk "Shushpantser" turned out to be a vehicle for ensuring crossing "Holder"


One of the issued copies of the MP “Holder” of the 2007 photo of the year
Photos used:
Anna News
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Proxima 8 October 2019 14: 21 New
    • 14
    • 2
    +12
    We can say that this is a unique instance, in the literal and figurative sense of the word! good LNR can be exchanged this exhibit for several serial tanks? They probably need them now.
  2. eagle owl 8 October 2019 14: 37 New
    • 3
    • 5
    -2
    Honestly. immediately thought about TCP))) By the way, here was the tops - C Sabra, it seems, these exercises were called ... I was personally pinned. how the penguins spoke about the ancient PTSke, which is interesting at the Uralvagonzavod. Well, let's say they spoke in positive
    1. combat192 9 October 2019 10: 22 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Do you yourself understand the meaning of what you wrote?
  3. Lord of the Sith 8 October 2019 14: 41 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    That shushpantser saw repeatedly, the sizes inspire))
    1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS 8 October 2019 16: 50 New
      • 1
      • 2
      -1
      Quote: Lord of the Sith
      That shushpantser saw repeatedly, the sizes inspire))

      And you accidentally did not see how she was at work.
      1. Lord of the Sith 8 October 2019 18: 14 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        No, unfortunately I did not see her at work.
  4. bars1 8 October 2019 14: 50 New
    • 3
    • 2
    +1
    This is never a shushpanzer.
    1. Lord of the Sith 8 October 2019 14: 57 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Well, why?))

      Currently, the word "shushpantser" often refers not only to unusual tanks, but also to any armored vehicles that can be considered rare or unique (produced in single copies), the common name for unusual, rare, amazing or ugly armored vehicles.
      1. eagle owl 8 October 2019 16: 59 New
        • 1
        • 4
        -3
        And what is TCP ... Even the second one, well, does the shush look like? Nah
  5. Thrifty 8 October 2019 15: 19 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    There is one instance, let them build at least another 6-7 cars, for the army of the republic this is the necessary equipment.
    1. 113262a 8 October 2019 15: 39 New
      • 12
      • 0
      +12
      Alas, this is the last! At 14, the workshop was opened in the OR, where the ready-made ones were stored. four cars are lost - two at the Metalworker - were used at a checkpoint - in a sieve! two more died during the defense of Lugansk. There is one more, with a tank, anti-nuclear lining and a powerful hydraulic monitor. But it wasn’t military-made for CheAC for decontamination.
  6. Evil 55 8 October 2019 15: 56 New
    • 2
    • 7
    -5
    Foolishness, of course, is healthy, and therefore the target is good, so in modern conditions it is better for it to clear the forest away from the front and stump uprooted .. That's why it will be shown only in parades ..
  7. Ros 56 8 October 2019 15: 57 New
    • 11
    • 8
    +3
    A very necessary car in the Donbass, they need more to clean the country from Bandera dirt and garbage.
    1. shark 8 October 2019 16: 16 New
      • 18
      • 3
      +15
      Dear! Well, we are not at the rally. And nobody needs to agitate here. All his
  8. SERGEY SERGEEVICS 8 October 2019 16: 35 New
    • 2
    • 2
    0
    A good thing happened, the troops will always fit.
  9. Kaw
    Kaw 8 October 2019 16: 36 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    And how does it ensure the crossing with the help of a winch, bucket and motor drill? Or was it used together with pantone park?
  10. Monar 8 October 2019 16: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Specialists, specify. BMD chassis lengthened? Or just looks like?
    1. Mik13 8 October 2019 17: 07 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: Monar
      Specialists, specify. BMD chassis lengthened? Or just looks like?

      There is a chassis on T-64 units.
      1. Monar 8 October 2019 17: 34 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Right 64-ka. The front drive was embarrassed. But the road wheels, it was stupid not to find out.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. UVB
      UVB 8 October 2019 17: 10 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      PTS (medium floating conveyor) Chassis based on the T-64 tank, payload afloat up to 10 tons.
      1. Dikson 8 October 2019 17: 28 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        quite a seaworthy car, by the way .. But the control is very difficult, compared with the GTT or artillery tractors ... In the Ministry of Emergency Situations there are enough such machines ...
  11. Observer2014 8 October 2019 17: 36 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    From personal. That's when I really went nuts for the first time. So in December 1997. Early in the morning. After a heavy snowfall I had to go on business. And there really was a lot of snow during the night. And when I went outside I was dumbfounded a house-sized road laughing It was something! She cleared the road at the moment. Then I thought for a long time what a miracle had flown by ?! Now I understand what it was laughing
    1. ROSS_51 9 October 2019 00: 20 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      As I understand it, can it clear the road of borders along with fanar posts?
      1. Observer2014 9 October 2019 00: 23 New
        • 3
        • 1
        +2
        You are trying to understand something. This is commendable. Like from me.
  12. Prisoner 8 October 2019 17: 39 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Soviet military designers, this was an elite. Fact!
  13. RUSS 8 October 2019 19: 56 New
    • 0
    • 19
    -19
    Crap .....
    1. Dart 8 October 2019 23: 53 New
      • 4
      • 1
      +3
      when you just change your nickname ... or help you, I hope))
      1. RUSS 9 October 2019 07: 58 New
        • 0
        • 12
        -12
        Quote: Dart
        when you just change your nickname ... or help you, I hope))

        You can give advice to your wife, and about the fact that this is crap, so she is crap, since it’s just a transporter, and you can’t wash armored personnel carriers out of it, Ukrainians did something similar, so you fussed over them with the whole forum.
  14. tolmachiev51 9 October 2019 02: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Versatility is certainly a tempting thing, especially in military equipment, but there are too many “BUTs.” One broke down, you automatically lost 3-4 pieces of equipment. and in a war, it’s fraught.
  15. AleBors 9 October 2019 09: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    At the beginning, in June 2014, Batman and his guys put 2 similar pieces on the move and blocked the road under the Metalist ...
  16. Chaldon48 9 October 2019 11: 52 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    When will the use of the capabilities of this technique begin? Apparently hour X has been given to Zelensky for the time being.
  17. datur 10 October 2019 00: 41 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    a good thing!! wink our boys there would be even better ones !!!! wink drive banderlog !! wink