Kurds alarmed by US statement on Turkish military operation in SAR

32
Turkish troops at the moment have not begun the active phase of the operation in the north of Syria, although it was announced in the “announcements” about a possible start on Sunday (October 6) or Monday night (October 7).





The White House press secretariat said that the United States will not participate in the Turkish military campaign, which Ankara positions as anti-terrorism. Recall that the Turkish authorities said earlier that they saw a growing threat to Turkish security from the Kurdish armed forces, including the so-called Syrian Democratic Forces (SDS), supported by the United States.

At the same time, the head of the press service of the US administration notes that US troops "will not be in the areas of the operation and will not participate in it either." At the moment, in the north of Syria there are about 1 thousands of American troops.

At the moment, it is not clear whether the contingent of the US Army will leave northern Syria outside the country or be transferred to other provinces. Perhaps the US military will simply be located in the north of the SAR, where the Turks will not conduct their operation.

This statement of the White House was taken with alarm in Syrian Kurdistan, noting that in this case, the Kurdish troops could be left alone with the Turkish army.

The Turkish plan is to create in the north of the SAR a buffer zone up to 30 km wide and about 480 km long - along the entire border of Syria and Turkey. Up to 2 million Syrian refugees from Turkey are planned to be relocated to this zone. The Kurds are also alarmed by the fact that such steps by Ankara will radically change the ethnic composition in the north of the SAR, because the vast majority of Syrian refugees in Turkey are ethnic Arabs.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    7 October 2019 08: 21
    What are the naive Kurds. They didn’t understand that they weren’t Americans to protect the Kurds, but they were covering up with their bodies.
    1. +6
      7 October 2019 08: 51
      And also to fight with the Turks when the United States needs.
    2. +5
      7 October 2019 10: 49
      Quote: Captive
      What are the naive Kurds. They didn’t understand that they weren’t Americans to protect the Kurds, but they were covering up with their bodies.
      Kurds are alarmed
      They thought that the United States had invited them to eat sherbet. The United States needs the blood of rams who are not on friendly terms with the head. Now the United States will turn over the Kurds to the Turks and say: "Sultan, let's continue to be friends. You see, I am your sincere friend. Nobody has done more for Turkey's security than me." And it will not cost the United States a single cent. And the sultan, "you will lie to him with three boxes and do with him what you want."
  2. +5
    7 October 2019 08: 24
    Tell me who your "friend" is.
    Indeed, why is it now rustling when the fabege "entrusted" such a "reliable" partner .... it's time to say goodbye to them.
    1. +3
      7 October 2019 08: 50
      I really wanted to believe them, but decided to try it our own skin.
      1. +1
        7 October 2019 09: 07
        Quote: cniza
        I really wanted to believe them, but decided to try it our own skin.

        This is understandable, they have a dream, an eternal one ... only by contacting the wrong guy, you can also dream, realize it here and now, say goodbye and the lives of so many of her supporters!
        Tell me who is your ......?
        1. +3
          7 October 2019 09: 11
          Yeah, someone made some money, and then let them scoop out themselves.
          1. +1
            7 October 2019 09: 18
            To teach a scientist if he doesn’t want it .... it’s easier to get a hippopotamus out of a swamp!
    2. 0
      7 October 2019 20: 13
      That’s what we talked about yesterday, it’s become even clearer today. It was clear in advance that the United States would withdraw, and the Kurds, because there is no experience in the political field, did not understand and will not understand that they should not go against the central authorities, countries where they live.
  3. +2
    7 October 2019 08: 33
    Again, the Americans leaked their allies ...
    1. +1
      7 October 2019 10: 24
      Not only Americans, they were all merged, it’s a sin not to merge such.
      1. 0
        7 October 2019 11: 18
        The Kurds received complete isolation. They will have to push far the hopes of their statehood. America will not help them in this.
  4. +2
    7 October 2019 08: 35
    There are not only Kurdish military units, but also the population. The regular army "in an open field" will crush the "partisans", after all, the Turks are not amusing troops of the Saudis. And what will they do with the population? Well, the ally ... They chose it themselves! Don't get it yet? These are notable "scammers" from behind a puddle, get acquainted!
    1. 0
      7 October 2019 20: 22
      Believe me, the Turks are waiting for the population to free themselves from these militants. Last year, the heads of tribes (Ashyreti) gathered from these revenge in Turkey and declared that they were next to Turkey. People want to live in peace and security, and not under constant pressure militants. And for these people, El-Bab and Afrin are an example, that people there already live in peace and better.
      1. 0
        7 October 2019 20: 31
        Quote: Oquzyurd
        Believe me, the Turks are waiting for the population,

        We believe with pleasure ... when the Kurds did not wait with the open arms of the Turks ... they shine directly with joy and look forward to when these good people drive them from their native land to beggarly refugee camps, and 2 will be given their homes to the millions of Sunni refugees who are now in Turkey
        1. 0
          7 October 2019 20: 42
          140 villages and 10 towns will be built separately for refugees. Nobody and nobody will take anything away. We even took into account the intricacies that these villages will be built exactly. So, they will build villages on state lands (according to balance), and not anywhere , for example: not on the private lands of the people living there now. And you say they’ll take away ... you are mistaken.
          1. -1
            7 October 2019 20: 46
            On whose state lands? Since when has the Turkish army become urban planners in Kurdish land? Who gave the Turks the right to do these miracles on the land of another country and another people? Let them build and settle
            1. 0
              7 October 2019 20: 50
              Is Turkey obliged to shelter and feed millions of Syrians for years? They, with international donor countries, will build these villages for the Syrians, in the lands of Syria. What is still not clear?
              1. -1
                7 October 2019 20: 58
                Turkey is one of the main instigators of the war in Syria. This is first. Refugees from the territories controlled by Assad. Here it may settle and build houses for them if you want. And not on the land of Kurds. Refugees are not Kurds. Nedosultan played in his cheap games . For the sake of momentary political gains, I kindled a fire in Syria, started refugees, started a business on them and blackmailed Europe, and when refugees became unprofitable and because of them lost their support in the elections, I decided to make a mess in Kurdish lands and to poison refugees with Kurds . These matters are not without a trace Statement mogilu.Est saying-all ohodyat and nedosultan digs himself outsmarted himself zabyl.Kak not exactly the case)
                1. 0
                  7 October 2019 21: 08
                  "This is firstly. Refugees from the territories controlled by Assad. Let him settle there and build houses for them if he wants to. And not on the lands of the Kurds. Refugees are not Kurds" First, this is the land of the Syrian state, not the "Kurdish lands" Secondly, there are 350-400 thousand Kurdish refugees in Turkey in general. Thirdly, Assad has already announced an amnesty and many will return to the territories controlled by the authorities.
                  1. 0
                    7 October 2019 21: 11
                    Quote: Oquzyurd
                    Firstly, it is the land of the Syrian state

                    And with what Syrian state did Erdogan agree to bring his army first to Afrina and now to the east and resettle someone else?
                    1. 0
                      7 October 2019 21: 29
                      The state of Syria temporarily lost control over these territories due to the fact that the local Kurds, lovers of "freedom" sniffed the United States, entered under their wing and imagined that they could afford anything, after all, behind their backs an overseas uncle. , and seeing that Syria does not currently control the northern part of the country, decided that it was impossible to leave the territory to the militants who want to destroy Syria. Simply put, Turkey is trying to ensure that Syria was within its (internationally recognized) borders. Moreover, the current Adana Treaty between Turkey and Syria provides that the Turks have put things in order near their borders.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. 0
    7 October 2019 08: 49
    At the moment, it is not clear whether the contingent of the US Army will leave northern Syria outside the country or be transferred to other provinces. Perhaps the US military will simply be located in the north of the SAR, where the Turks will not conduct their operation.


    The USA will not go anywhere voluntarily, there is a game and trade ...
  7. +1
    7 October 2019 09: 45
    They began to see more and more often that the war, in this century, must be defeated first on the treaty table, and then on the battlefield. Apparently, Turkey managed to successfully complete the first stage for this case.
  8. +3
    7 October 2019 09: 55
    The Kurds should have realized for a long time that the mattresses are still "allies" and appear only to share the result of a victory won by someone else's hands.
    1. 0
      7 October 2019 11: 05
      Inappropriate reference to the Second World War.
      1. +2
        7 October 2019 11: 20
        Quote: maden.usmanow
        Inappropriate reference to the Second World War.
        Well, give examples of the glorious victories of mattresses with an equal opponent. With equal no. They always beat the weak. They themselves only climbed into Vietnam, where they received bream in physiognomy and kicks at the fifth point, having lost more than 50 thousand of their soldiers ingloriously left him. Since then, they always transfer the lion's share of risks to the shoulders of the allies entering the coalition with them, preferring to act from afar.
  9. -1
    7 October 2019 10: 22
    "This statement of the White House was received with alarm in Syrian Kurdistan, noting that in this case, the Kurdish units may be left alone with the Turkish army."

    But where are the loud statements that the Kurds will respond with war along the entire border? And then they perceived with alarm that they could be left alone)). Such a pain....
  10. 0
    7 October 2019 10: 41
    in this case, the Kurdish troops may be left alone with the Turkish army
    Strange, but the Kurds still have not understood or do not want to understand that the Americans will not fight for them. It is one thing to help with arms, to support politically and, at the same time, pursuing only one's own goal - to prevent the end of the war in Syria, and another to take part in the b / d or to cover the Kurds from the Turks with one's "authority". We have already forgotten how the Americans repeatedly deceived them by promising one thing and doing another.
  11. -1
    7 October 2019 11: 11
    Kurds never look one step ahead. They did not dare to legally fix their strip in northeastern Syria as an "autonomous region", "a special area for a national minority" or something like that. The UN would be poked.
    This would make it difficult for the Turks to hammer them.
    1. 0
      7 October 2019 20: 33
      What is the national region, if many Kurds have been settled in parts of these cities and towns in recent years, a mess in Syria? Such a statement would accelerate the reaction of Turkey, and the war would go to death. Nothing good would come of this venture for the Kurds, just make the Turks more merciless.
  12. 0
    7 October 2019 18: 02
    The best solution for the Kurds in this situation is to negotiate with official Damascus and urgently seek a compromise solution. Of course, they will have to forget about independence, about wide autonomy too, but they will save their lives and the lives of their loved ones. Maybe some concessions will come from the Syrian authorities. Assad, whatever one may say, you need to think about how to regain control of the northern part of the country. So negotiations, if any, are beneficial for both parties. Is there only enough determination to carry them out?