Arab Leclerks await Belarusian tractors

21
Belarus hopes to get another contract for the supply of additional carriers of heavy military equipment to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This was announced by Chairman of the State Military-Industrial Committee of the country Roman Golovchenko.





We are about to finalize a major contract [with the UAE] that was announced a long time ago: tank tractors. We are negotiating to build it up and sign a new agreement for the transfer of the same kind of equipment after [it] tests

- Golovchenko explained on September 13 at a meeting held in Belarus with Crown Prince Abu Dhabi Muhammad bin Zayed.

In October 2016, it was announced that the Minsk Wheel and Tractor Plant (MZKT, which manufactures products under the Volat brand), will supply the latest conveyors manufactured by them in the UAE (the basis of the tank fleet of which are Leclerks):

This is a fairly important contract, the implementation of which should begin next year. Now the equipment is undergoing final tests in the UAE

- said Golovchenko, who was then the ambassador to the Emirates.

Characteristics of the MZKT-741351 + 999421 + 837211 road train:

Wheel formula: 8x8, load capacity: 136 tons, engine: Caterpillar C18 (USA), power: 812 h.p.

21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    20 September 2019 07: 52
    Well done Belarusians, good tractors. Soviet school is working. That's just with the engines they also have problems.
    1. +18
      20 September 2019 08: 02
      Which engine the customer chooses is the one to put it on. Russia - YaMZ, Arabs - caterpillar.
      1. +1
        20 September 2019 08: 38
        Quote: Nemo
        Which engine the customer chooses is the one to put it on.

        Well then, as we say, "everything is a bunch." Every whim for your money.
      2. 0
        20 September 2019 13: 53
        So the problem is that the customer of Kata chooses, not YaMZ. That's when the opposite will happen ...
    2. +2
      20 September 2019 08: 40
      There are no special problems, but why do Arabs need YaMZ? When they have a good CAT story, plus service coverage. So they order. This is an option. Also, a climate system reinforced for cold is ordered. Well, etc.
    3. -14
      20 September 2019 08: 47
      If they hadn’t used Russian improvements in these trucks, they didn’t have a price, otherwise we modified them and they sell almost * our equipment * everywhere.
      1. +2
        20 September 2019 09: 55
        Do you have any confirmation of your words or is it an empty chatter? In the news you can find information that the MZKT produces bridges, axles, suspension for Typhoon-u.
      2. +10
        20 September 2019 10: 06
        And what kind of Russian modifications in these "trucks" are used at MZKT?
        You are not lurking. Tell the world the truth of the womb. And at the same time, find out that back in the first half of the last century 90x, the MZKT installed on some models of its tractors a digital information management system (IMS) created by the Minsk Research Institute of Digital Television on the basis of the on-board IMS of the SU 27 aircraft developed by the same research institute.
        Then they only dreamed about such systems in the automobile industry of Russia. And the developments of KAMAZs and BAZ, which tried and are trying to replace the Belarusian tractors in the RF Armed Forces with their own, are based on technical solutions of the MZKT. So you don’t need to sing songs that have already snapped up about the harmful Belarusians who only do what they steal from the lack of analogs of Russian know-how.
  2. -12
    20 September 2019 07: 53
    Well, the Old Man brought his family savings to the Arabian Peninsula and now it has become easier to trade Belarusian military products.
  3. +5
    20 September 2019 08: 19
    Beautiful car. Well done Belarusians
  4. +1
    20 September 2019 08: 24
    At one time, he traveled a lot on the MAZ-537, the equipment is good, although it is not without some drawbacks.
    1. 0
      20 September 2019 09: 21
      By the way, the KZKT where MAZ-537 was produced in the early 90s also received a similar order for NATO, but I don’t remember whether it was successful or not.
    2. +1
      20 September 2019 09: 54
      At one time, he traveled a lot on the MAZ-537, the equipment is good, although it is not without some drawbacks.

      It was the same thing. The truth is quite small. For a couple of hundred km: a cut-off compressor pulley (there are two of them), the gearbox is jammed. They didn’t reach the destination. Thrown into the field under .... in the Samara steppes lol The further fate of this papalaz is unknown to me.
  5. 0
    20 September 2019 09: 05
    carrying capacity: 136 t,
    For two Leclercs at a time? feel
    1. +2
      20 September 2019 09: 54
      And there is. On the semi-trailer 2 rpm, in the desert rushing like a beast. The weakest link is the wheels, tires do not last long.
  6. 0
    20 September 2019 09: 24
    Excellent tractors. Only I am against the maneuvers of oversized vehicles under the wing of the Ruslan. And if it hooks, or something "bounces off" into the engine. I do not understand such "consequences" for the sake of a beautiful photo. Silly kindergarten.
  7. -5
    20 September 2019 09: 32
    MZKT-Minsk wheel-tractor factory.Rzhu like a horse !!!!!
    1. +10
      20 September 2019 10: 54
      Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant, shake the hay.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        23 September 2019 00: 07
        So what am I talking about? As written in the article?
  8. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  9. -1
    21 September 2019 09: 29
    Are Belarusians not under sanctions? Where are the "Katovskie" engines from?
  10. 0
    23 September 2019 16: 35
    So what, they introduced censorship on VO? The author screwed up with the "Minsk Wheel-Tractor Plant (MZKT, producing products under the Volat trademark)" and will now ban and delete comments? Democratic, what ...