Military Review

NI: Russian purchase of Su-57 fighters speaks of preparations for war

190
Russia buys a large number of fifth-generation fighter Su-57, clearly preparing for a large-scale armed conflict between major powers. This opinion was expressed by the expert of the publication The National Interest Charlie Gao.


NI: Russian purchase of Su-57 fighters speaks of preparations for war


According to the American expert, Russia's purchase of a large number of Su-57 fighters clearly indicates that the country is preparing for an armed conflict with a major power. In July of this year, the Russian Ministry of Defense signed a contract with the aircraft manufacturer for the supply of 76 aircraft of this type until 2028. But this, the author of the article is convinced, is only the beginning and in the future the rate of production of fighter jets can increase significantly, which means that the Russian military will begin to purchase even more such aircraft.

The author points out that the Su-57 development program turned out to be so lengthy due to the fact that the fighter used the latest technologies, the development of which takes time. In the end, he adds, “the Russians” turned out to be a plane stuffed with the best technologies that the Russian aerospace industry can offer: powerful engines, brilliant maneuverability, first-class avionics, including radars with an active phased array.

As an example, he cited the development of the Soviet Su-27 fighter, the creation of which took 15 years, but it turned out to be an aircraft that has been in the arsenal of the country's air force for many years and has the potential for modernization. The same thing with the Su-57, which is created "for years to come."

Of course, the expert explains, the defense budget of Russia is by no means comparable with the Soviet, but the Russian military has enough money to develop new products and therefore it is not necessary to neglect the batch of Su-76 fighters in the 57 against the background of hundreds of F-35 coming into service USA and NATO. After the country’s Air Force receives and tests the first of these aircraft, the contract may be amended. And in the event that Russia finds a foreign buyer for it, the cost of these machines will decrease significantly, which will lead to an increase in supplies to the Russian army.
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
190 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. figwam
    figwam 17 September 2019 18: 40
    +74
    Russia buys a large number of fifth-generation fighter Su-57, clearly preparing for a large-scale armed conflict between major powers.

    Well, of course 76 aircraft is clearly for a world war, the whole world is in ruins)))
    1. Egorovich
      Egorovich 17 September 2019 18: 48
      +50
      Want peace, get ready for war! In such a jackal environment, Russia can only rely on itself.
      1. SERGEY SERGEEVICS
        SERGEY SERGEEVICS 17 September 2019 19: 15
        +5
        Quote: Egorovich
        Want peace, get ready for war! In such a jackal environment, Russia can only rely on itself.

        We do not hope for others, we always do it on our own.
        1. Lbt21
          Lbt21 17 September 2019 21: 44
          -15
          Can you comment on the lendlis somehow?
          1. Pavel57
            Pavel57 17 September 2019 23: 08
            +1
            Lend lease in the concept of us and they do not fit.
            1. krot
              krot 18 September 2019 07: 53
              +9
              And the purchase of F35, is this preparation for the world?))) What does it have to do much earlier than we began to purchase)))
          2. Vanek
            Vanek 18 September 2019 03: 39
            +8
            Quote: Lbt21
            Can you comment on the lendlis somehow?


            And you?
          3. skif8013
            skif8013 18 September 2019 07: 54
            +4
            Quote: Lbt21
            Can you comment on the lendlis somehow?

            Lendlis is a robbery, purely business, and not help.
          4. Cyrus
            Cyrus 18 September 2019 08: 51
            +2
            First, compare the amount delivered on an ice lens and the number released in the USSR during the war, and then write.
            1. Pavel57
              Pavel57 18 September 2019 09: 01
              -1
              There are Lend-Lease positions without which the USSR would be very bad. And these are not tanks and planes.
              1. Paranoid50
                Paranoid50 18 September 2019 09: 39
                +4
                Quote: Pavel57
                There are Lend-Lease positions without which the USSR would be very bad.

                There is one "position", without which mattresses with bedding would be very bad then. The USSR is called. yes
              2. Dali
                Dali 18 September 2019 09: 44
                +3
                Quote: Pavel57
                There are Lend-Lease positions without which the USSR would be very bad. And these are not tanks and planes.


                1) Well, give the layout of what and when they sold us (note).

                2) And why, when it was necessary 100% there were no deliveries, but only started when they realized that we could do without them
                1. Pavel57
                  Pavel57 18 September 2019 12: 45
                  +1
                  The main things we could not do without are explosives, aluminum, steel additives. Well, and the trucks. Such trifles as machine tools, telephones, rubber and penicillin can not be remembered.
                  Well, tanks and planes were needed, especially 1942-1943 years, otherwise why they were taken.
                  If this were not the case, the war could drag out and end on completely different conditions and with different losses.

                  And to go deep, what is free and what kind of money in this case does not make sense.
                  1. Sanichsan
                    Sanichsan 18 September 2019 14: 49
                    +7
                    Quote: Pavel57
                    The main things we could not do without are explosives, aluminum, steel additives. Well, and the trucks. Such trifles as machine tools, telephones, rubber and penicillin can not be remembered.

                    of all of the above nothing. only gunpowder turned out to be really useful (you did not mention them). for example, in 1943, the number of Lendliz trucks in the Soviet army was 1%. 45 already has 30% but of which 70% was under repair. not friends with our gasoline.
                    Quote: Pavel57
                    If this were not the case, the war could drag out and end on completely different conditions and with different losses.

                    losses would have been higher and the war would have ended on the shores of the La Manche. I don't think it would suit our "allies".
                    Quote: Pavel57
                    And to go deep, what is free and what kind of money in this case does not make sense.

                    are you blissful if your neighbor sets fire to your house to sell you a fire extinguisher, will you also have questions for him? Well, that’s all. helped wink
                    1. Pavel57
                      Pavel57 18 September 2019 15: 17
                      -3
                      You cannot fight without gunpowder and explosives, and more than 50% of all that we used in the war was received. And if there was shell hunger, then you could forget about Berlin.
                      Lendlizovsky trucks .... especially when GAZ was bombed to zero ...
                      The end of the war on the English Channel, a great idea. only by estimates would it cost us 1mln more. losses.
                      I leave aside the question of political and / or economic benefit. Otherwise, one can drown in righteous anger. Is not it?))))
                      1. Sanichsan
                        Sanichsan 18 September 2019 16: 20
                        +5
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        You won’t fight without gunpowder and explosives, and more than 50% of all that we used in the war was received.

                        why lie so rude? Do you want your theses to not be taken seriously at all? in 1941, there was almost no lend-lease, and the Germans were thrown back from Moscow. in principle, the outcome of the war was already visible, especially by the Germans. in 1942 with almost the same opening Stalingrad. in 1945, when the volume of lendlize was maximum, the amount of lendlizovskogo gunpowder reached 30%. explosives and its missing.
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        And if there was shell hunger, then you could forget about Berlin.
                        fierce nonsense.
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        Lendlizovsky trucks .... especially when GAZ was bombed to zero ...

                        Once again, for those who do not understand what they read, in 1943 in the Soviet troops 1% of Lendliz trucks from the total number of trucks in the troops. what there bombed to zero? do not carry nonsense.
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        The end of the war on the English Channel, a great idea. only by estimates would it cost us 1mln more. losses.

                        Yes. but it was possible. and at the end of the war there would be fewer geopolitical problems.
                      2. Pavel57
                        Pavel57 18 September 2019 16: 33
                        0
                        Some time ago, I would completely agree with you. But a little delving into this topic changed his mind.
                        Understand then yourself on the availability of gunpowder, explosives, cars, the quality of armor on T-34 tanks in 1942, the quality of artillery before receiving American machine tools, etc.

                        And if I am "grossly lying", then Comrade Stalin was not so narrow-minded, having signed up for Lend-Lease, if it was completely insignificant for Victory.

                        Ultimately, the topic is a little about something else about the Su-57, though.)))
                      3. Sanichsan
                        Sanichsan 18 September 2019 16: 48
                        +1
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        Some time ago, I would completely agree with you. But a little delving into this topic changed his mind.

                        delve a little more. write garbage. for example, about trucks.
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        Understand then yourself on the availability of gunpowder, explosives, cars, the quality of armor on T-34 tanks in 1942, the quality of artillery before receiving American machine tools, etc.

                        Well this is already a mess. all in one heap, and problems with staff and evacuation and landlis ... what are you talking about? about Lendlis or production problems during the Great Patriotic War? decide.
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        And if I'm lying, then Comrade Stalin was not so short-sighted, signing up for a lease-lease, if he was completely insignificant for victory.

                        in that difficult situation any help was needed. but crumbling over her in gratitude knowing all the details of the beginning of the conflict, this is somehow very strange. especially considering that the allies supplied not only the USSR but also Germany. GM at the end of the war even received compensation for the bombed German factories. money doesn’t smell for them.
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        Ultimately, the topic is a little bit different.

                        so what about?
                        1) volumes of lendlis and the criticality of his contribution to the defeat of Germany.
                        2) thanks for this "help"
                        3) problems of the military-industrial complex during the Second World War
                      4. Pavel57
                        Pavel57 18 September 2019 17: 18
                        -2
                        You can relate differently to the source, but in a hurry you can see-
                        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4-%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B7
                        There, practically over the entire range of goods, there are numbers and a comparison with the level of production in the USSR during the war.
                      5. Sanichsan
                        Sanichsan 19 September 2019 16: 50
                        0
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        There, practically over the entire range of goods, there are numbers and a comparison with the level of production in the USSR during the war.

                        that’s what, but I don’t recommend using numbers from there. wink
                        for example, data on materials and their production in the USSR are taken from an article in the BBC and a page that does not exist, that is, a campaign from the ceiling.
                        I'm sorry if you rethought your views on the basis of this heresy request
                      6. Pavel57
                        Pavel57 20 September 2019 09: 28
                        0
                        Your only argument is heresy. Suggest other sources of statistics on USSR production and Lend-Lease deliveries. I am not a historian, and I have not dealt specifically with this issue.
                        The essence is clear, while the evacuation of industry was going on, the final products were more important - aircraft and tanks. When the evacuation was completed, raw materials were needed. And then, when the state was spent. reserves, then there was a need for food. The share of a number of strategic feedstock positions in the supply of Lend-Lease was significant. The supply of industrial equipment in many cases made it possible to refuse or reduce the purchase of military products, which was valuable even after the end of the war.
                        It is simpler to assume that we did everything ourselves and help in the form of deliveries did not play a role. Played, I propose not to ignore historical facts, which does not detract from our contribution to the Victory.
                      7. Sanichsan
                        Sanichsan 20 September 2019 15: 45
                        0
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        I am not a historian, and I have not dealt specifically with this issue.

                        me too, but Isaev is a historian. he worked in the archives and dealt with this issue. check out.
                        Quote: Pavel57
                        Played, I propose not to ignore historical facts, which does not detract from our contribution to the Victory.

                        of course played! I don’t deny it. but attempts to claim that he played a key role are, to put it mildly, far from true, not to mention what is a crude attempt to belittle the feat of Soviet industry. soldier
                        I already wrote to you why my attitude to Lendlis is very ambiguous.
                      8. smart ass
                        smart ass 18 September 2019 16: 38
                        +2
                        I did not think that the production of shells for Soviet Union equipment mastered British industry during the Second World War
                      9. Pavel57
                        Pavel57 18 September 2019 16: 44
                        0
                        Shells are metal (it was in the USSR), but also gunpowder and explosives (and they were obviously not enough). Here is a land-lease and provided materials for the production of shells.
                  2. Horon
                    Horon 18 September 2019 15: 13
                    +3
                    Instead of lend-lease, they themselves could go to war by attacking the German troops in France, even before the fascist divisions were driven back from Moscow, then the Soviet Union would save many millions of lives, though allies would have paid these millions of lives!
                    1. Pavel57
                      Pavel57 18 September 2019 15: 24
                      +3
                      So you answered why they pulled with the opening of a second front in Europe. Although both Africa and Italy diverted part of Germany's resources. The Americans needed a victory, and it is not important for them who and how the heat will rake.
              3. Paladin
                Paladin 19 September 2019 08: 27
                +2
                More or less sane Lend-Lease began at the end of 1943. after the battle of Stalingrad and the elimination of the boiler. It was not the USSR that began to become very bad. And just compare the percentage of Lend-Lease, for example, in England and the USSR. Then maybe you will understand who would be "really bad".
          5. Dali
            Dali 18 September 2019 09: 40
            +10
            Quote: Lbt21
            Can you comment on the lendlis somehow?

            Like this help ?! belay
            And nothing that for this Landlease they paid in full platinum, gold and other rare earth metals !!! And these "western" citizens specifically earned, but did not help !!!

            So you c. Learn the story and remove the pan from your head.

            shl
            1) Yes, there is completely open information about how much this "landlease" took in the total volume of weapons produced in the USSR
            2) Can you tell me the start date of deliveries - eppst, where were these merchants, even for gold and platinum in the autumn of 1941 ?! belay
          6. Every
            Every 18 September 2019 10: 03
            +7
            Quote: Lbt21
            Can you comment on the lendlis somehow?

            What can I comment on here? The United States made a lot of money on Lend-Lease. We loaded our factories with orders and raised the economy. Do not forget that the consequences of the "Great Depression" were not over by the beginning of WWII.
            So think about who won the most from lendlize?
          7. Alexander (Ed) Khaimov
            Alexander (Ed) Khaimov 18 September 2019 10: 31
            +4
            Well, of course. The United States fidgeted and not sickly welded on us. And do not need fairy tales that the help was free! They even more had trophies and other buns.
          8. Captain Pushkin
            Captain Pushkin 18 September 2019 11: 06
            +1
            Quote: Lbt21
            Can you comment on the lendlis somehow?

            What is the question about? Can the Russian Federation supply Su-57 to the USA under Lend-Lease?
            But the USA doesn’t fight with anyone at all, they don’t want to fight with anyone and are preparing for peace with all their might?
            Or are they already fighting? Or fight with whom are you going?
          9. Horon
            Horon 18 September 2019 15: 06
            +3
            Yes! More than 20 million comments will suit you?
          10. Geo
            Geo 18 September 2019 23: 12
            +2
            Yeah. Lendliz is an excuse from the opening of the 2nd front, while the Germans and Russians are draining each other's strengths to the point where they can both be taken with their bare hands. This topic is the centuries-old traditions of Anglo-Saxon politics (take part in the war on the continent denyuzhku, and when the warring are weakened - enter the troops and be a winner, take what you want), which this time failed, because the Russians, defeating the Germans, were too strong to so that you can begin to dictate their conditions to them. But it doesn’t matter, now Lendlis can be used for propaganda purposes, saying that we, too, have invested in victory
          11. Bator
            Bator 19 September 2019 16: 16
            +1
            They only paid for landlords under Putin. Without it, they would have won anyway, there would have been more losses and victory would have been later.
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 17 September 2019 18: 57
      +11
      "Western partners" do not like the trend of developing the latest fighters. Where 76, there will be 376, and they know it.

      And in fact, Fu-35, for example, makes many countries, and not just Yankees, and therefore hundreds.
      1. Karabas
        Karabas 17 September 2019 19: 11
        +8
        And in fact, Fu-35, for example, makes many countries, and not just Yankees, and therefore hundreds.

        Yes, it’s not a question, if, then, once the mechanism has been debugged for these countries for us (for Yankees), who digs ore, who smelts it, who uses raw materials for composites, who prefer it — money, and we will only collect and develop them from us, I am not against the American approach laughing
    3. Buskanov
      Buskanov 17 September 2019 18: 58
      +35
      And the purchase of hundreds (maybe thousands) of fu-35 speaks of the preparation of mattresses for the war with the Martians chtoli? Xperper forgot to enable logic
      1. PValery53
        PValery53 17 September 2019 19: 42
        +15
        And Americans, buying large quantities of F-35, are preparing for peace. Probably to the world on its own terms ...
      2. vlad106
        vlad106 17 September 2019 21: 47
        +10
        Quote: Buskanov
        According to the American expert, Russia's purchase of a large number of Su-57 fighters clearly indicates that the country is preparing for an armed conflict with a major power. In July of this year, Minis


        "According to the American expert, Russia's purchase of a large number of Su-57 fighters clearly indicates that the country is preparing for an armed conflict with a major power." ...

        Zionism pushes to war, pits peoples. in his great desire to make money in a mess
        1. 3danimal
          3danimal 17 September 2019 22: 52
          -8
          Again "anti-Zionist")
          Do you know the meaning of the term "Zionism" in general?
          1. DDT
            DDT 18 September 2019 03: 10
            +4
            You still write, anti-Semite ... But it’s still fashionable there, no? bully
            1. 3danimal
              3danimal 18 September 2019 04: 03
              -1
              In Russia (for now) it’s possible for everyone. ) It is important to understand what you are writing.
              Read in the Encyclopedia what Zionism is. And next time write correctly: “world Jewry”)
              1. pylon101
                pylon101 18 September 2019 04: 24
                +1
                This is a euphemism, and correctly used.
                1. 3danimal
                  3danimal 18 September 2019 07: 58
                  0
                  Explain the idea.
                  1. Alexander (Ed) Khaimov
                    Alexander (Ed) Khaimov 18 September 2019 10: 38
                    +1
                    You like the thirst (not necessarily the Jews). Do, do, but do not make yourself innocent sheep. laughing
                    1. 3danimal
                      3danimal 18 September 2019 12: 30
                      -1
                      And I, in fact, do not wait) Russian can not have an opinion?
                      So what do they do then? Do world conspiracies suit (with Freemasons)? )
    4. NEXUS
      NEXUS 17 September 2019 19: 02
      +13
      Quote: figvam
      Well, of course 76 aircraft is clearly for a world war, the whole world is in ruins)))

      That is, the base at our borders, more than 300 — from Ф-35 — is everything just done for the world? wassat
      1. poquello
        poquello 17 September 2019 19: 05
        +11
        Quote: NEXUS
        Quote: figvam
        Well, of course 76 aircraft is clearly for a world war, the whole world is in ruins)))

        That is, the base at our borders, more than 300 — from Ф-35 — is everything just done for the world? wassat

        so 76 it is necessary to restrain
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 17 September 2019 19: 10
          +13
          Quote: poquello
          so 76 it is necessary to restrain

          Politically argue, Chesslovo)) We take wings and legs to flies in childhood, and we make bombs from carbite, so from childhood we sleep and see how to capture and enslave everything. And no mattresses ... what kind of war for 80 years, what are you talking about? wassat They are actually white and fluffy. wassat
          1. taurtaurov
            taurtaurov 17 September 2019 19: 28
            -6
            Quote: NEXUS
            Quote: poquello
            so 76 it is necessary to restrain

            Politically argue, Chesslovo)) We take wings and legs to flies in childhood, and we make bombs from carbite, so from childhood we sleep and see how to capture and enslave everything. And no mattresses ... what kind of war for 80 years, what are you talking about? wassat They are actually white and fluffy. wassat

            Well, actually the legs and all the other parts to tear off not our methods but the terrorists, well, half the Europe worked, now we get answers from friends
      2. 3danimal
        3danimal 18 September 2019 04: 11
        0
        They are going to 35 immediately several planes to replace. Around 1500 only in the Air Force.
      3. 3danimal
        3danimal 18 September 2019 07: 57
        -5
        In 90's, it was a very good time to attack. But they, on the contrary, reduced funding, and reduced troops.
        1. mister-red
          mister-red 18 September 2019 10: 55
          +5
          2 factor; Nuclear weapons and the faith of the Americans that Russia is over.
          Even if there wasn’t p. 2, you would still beware. There’s Eun’s pair of incomprehensible missiles that could fly away, and it's still dumb.
          1. 3danimal
            3danimal 18 September 2019 12: 41
            -2
            It was very tight with the money. Instead of humanitarian aid, there were proposals to buy nuclear weapons for the nth amount of $ billion. Instead, they facilitated the relocation (pressure on Kazakhstan, Ukraine) of nuclear weapons in the Russian Federation. For what?
            What do you think is over? Does not bind logically. Then it was necessary by hook or by crook to redeem nuclear weapons. After all, the main goal was to prevent the spread.
        2. Horon
          Horon 18 September 2019 15: 22
          +2
          In the 90's in Russia there was a fairly rapid population decline, plus a parade of sovereignty. The only thing that bothered the West was nuclear weapons, it was necessary to wait a bit and Russia itself would fall apart. Then there was Yugoslavia, Iraq and control over the collapse of Russia was lost. Sadness for your kind.
          1. 3danimal
            3danimal 19 September 2019 05: 14
            -2
            If they were sure of such a scenario, they simply bought nuclear weapons in the republics and tried to crank up something similar in the Russian Federation (here, 100 billion is not a gigantic amount).
            How are Yugoslavia and Iraq tied here? The first worked in 2 months, the second in 3 (despite the pathos and bravado of Zhirinovsky).
            IMHO, there was no global goal of “destroying Russia” (only in Prokhanov’s head), they wanted to change their foreign policy to a less threatening one.
            1. Horon
              Horon 19 September 2019 09: 25
              +1
              They failed to buy it out, the elite had the instinct of self-preservation, and the EBN understood that they were still talking to him while Russia was a nuclear power (they even took it in J7). As for Yugoslavia and Iraq, they resisted and "behaved badly", all attention was concentrated on them. They beat not the one who has already fallen, but the one who is still standing! Russia at that time was already lying, but the moment of its rise was missed, the influence on the non-military process of destruction was lost. If negative processes continued, then nuclear weapons, in the end, the scattered states that later remained on the territory of Russia would have to sell it, due to their inability to contain it. Also in the process of disintegration, there was a high probability of its use within the country. This would be a good reason for the forcible seizure of nuclear weapons or ransom, and the ground for this has already been prepared, but did not grow together!
              1. 3danimal
                3danimal 19 September 2019 12: 19
                0
                Disparate "fragments" would sell it to everyone. Which is what the United States was most afraid of.
              2. 3danimal
                3danimal 19 September 2019 12: 29
                -1
                You do not understand: the elite in the republics would willingly sell it. But they were “convinced” to transfer it to the Russian Federation. Where is the logic? Prokhanov does not have it, but he is unwell.
                1. Horon
                  Horon 19 September 2019 13: 39
                  +1
                  You do not understand this, I'm not talking about the former republics of the USSR, I'm talking about Russia itself! Chechnya was a bleeding wound through which the population of Russia was quietly utilized (I am not talking only about Chentsians). It was essentially a civil war in the beginning. In the 90s, there was also a large population decline due to hunger, poisoning, heart attacks and strokes. But it would be flowers. Tatarstan, Yakutia began to talk about their sovereignty, and even the idea of ​​a sovereign Siberian republic began to circulate! (That would have flared up!) None of the above-mentioned republics could contain nuclear weapons, but if a civil war broke out then across the whole territory, then the probability of its use increased sharply. It was then that Russia intended to deliver an ultimatum - peaceful fragmentation, the introduction of peacekeepers and the seizure of the entire existing arsenal of nuclear weapons. (And you would have to agree!) Everything went to this, but then in Moscow they either turned out to be a little smarter, or people were still not completely moved and centrifugal forces were much less than anyone wanted. The moment when Chechnya ceased to be a detonator for the destruction of Russia was missed, and the transfer of terrorists there and the training of militants from the local population gave the exact opposite result.
                  1. petrakimov
                    petrakimov 19 September 2019 16: 27
                    0
                    Yakutia itself did not start talking about its sovereignty. Russia handed it to us and for some time demanded to take Magadan, Chukotka, Primorye for maintenance. Those. restore Yakutia within the borders of the Yakutsk Territory during the development of Siberia and the East of Russia. It was believed that Yakutia was so rich that it would easily contain these regions. At the same time, gold mining was destroyed in our country (there were no roads, transportation by air), ALROSA was under the control of the Chechens (only the war helped to throw them off diamonds).
                    In addition, there were no nuclear weapons in Yakutia. Generally. There were not even troops here. Except for the Tiksi military airfield for strategists. But by that time, strategists almost did not fly. We will not consider the border troops for military units, okay? In the city of Yakutsk there is a military unit numbering a little more than a company. Moreover, radio engineering. Of the weapons only AK, PM, PC, RPK and RPG-7. And, I forgot, even flares. There were about 200 rounds of ammunition for them. Moreover, the bottom row was crushed and green ammunition for AK poured out from there. How many years of war would be enough? What sovereignty could Yakutia speak of without the possibility of creating its own army? There were almost no factories even under the USSR. We even have rubber bands for underwear imported.
                    Sovereignty was "forcibly distributed" by the central government. We, Yakutia, could not be outside Russia without direct access to the borders of other countries. So finish the tales about the collapse of Russia with Yakutia, Tatarstan, etc. Look at yourself brothers Slavs! There is no need to blame the mirror if the face is crooked. It is precisely Moscow, Kiev and Minsk who have experience of the dastardly collapse of the country. That is why you can expect everything from Moscow.
                  2. 3danimal
                    3danimal 19 September 2019 18: 39
                    -1
                    Where did you get such a wide knowledge of the "secret plans"? Are there sources in the world government? )
                    What you expose is too much like conspiracy theory.
                    And this does not explain why the US “forced” the former Soviet republics to transfer nuclear weapons to the Russian Federation, and not to them, for example.
                    1. Horon
                      Horon 22 September 2019 16: 57
                      0
                      Where did you get such a wide knowledge of the "secret plans"?

                      They are secret only for people like you! All this was taken from open sources, with EBN no one even tried to hide the abomination of politics, and the prospect easily becomes visible when the largest possible cut of current processes is visible.
                      1. 3danimal
                        3danimal 22 September 2019 17: 40
                        -1
                        You did not pay attention to quotes?
                        What open sources spoke about the US plans to “break up” the Russian Federation?
                        For proponents of the theory of the existence of reptilians, for example, events taking place in the world seem evidence of their secret presence and rule.
                        This is me about biased estimates)
                        I repeat: facilitating the transfer of nuclear weapons from the former Soviet republics to the Russian Federation does not fit into the "sinister plan" that you believe in existence.
                      2. Horon
                        Horon 23 September 2019 08: 35
                        0
                        Change the training manual! negative
                      3. 3danimal
                        3danimal 23 September 2019 09: 04
                        -1
                        Do more powerful arguments (thoughts) appear in your mind?
                        I am guided only by logic, NOT by ideology, NOT by faith.
                  3. 3danimal
                    3danimal 19 September 2019 18: 42
                    -1
                    A parade of sovereignty ... Firstly, there was an economic collapse, and secondly, the question of how settled (and not crushed, hidden under the cloth) were internal contradictions.
        3. Tenet
          Tenet 19 September 2019 01: 41
          0
          how many wars did they start in 20 years !? shortened by accepting so many new members in the alliance !? angry so as not to upset ourselves ... fellow and if Gorbi and KO had not sold the USSR .......................
          1. 3danimal
            3danimal 19 September 2019 05: 19
            0
            This approach excludes the subjectivity of small countries. And this is a mistake.
            The USA cannot accept / not accept alone; consensus is needed.
            I wrote above why we do not need to be afraid of an attack. Only large losses and possible defeat during our attack on the same Baltic. (For them, this is a realistic scenario, the memory is fresh and a number of officials / military periodically add fuel to the fire).
          2. 3danimal
            3danimal 23 September 2019 09: 16
            -1
            Yes, there were no goals for Gorbi to “sell”. There was no money, the economy was brought to the fore by dogmatic experiments. Loans were collected from banks, had already been taken from governments.
    5. Karabas
      Karabas 17 September 2019 19: 07
      +3
      Well, of course 76 aircraft is clearly for a world war, the whole world is in ruins)))

      It's right. laughing 76 aircraft when their 7600 is needed.
      1. polar fox
        polar fox 18 September 2019 05: 26
        +3
        Quote: Karabas
        It's right. 76 aircraft when their 7600 is needed.

        Do you have pilots? and then we have a tradition, the last 20 years as in the toilet sat down, look for paper ...
        1. Karabas
          Karabas 18 September 2019 06: 56
          +1
          Do you have pilots? and then we have a tradition, the last 20 years as in the toilet sat down, look for paper ...

          This is not a question for me. Ask it to someone who is rated for a salary higher than the best world experts and does not get out of the TV. Let at least the answer to this question be clear at least 10rub work out of his s / n.
    6. Olya Tsako
      Olya Tsako 17 September 2019 19: 26
      +9
      And the sale, only to one Poland, of a party in 32 pieces of F-35, speaks of what? The propaganda machine of the West works in full steam.
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 19 September 2019 07: 23
        0
        The 35th is noticeably better than the planes that Poland now has.
    7. Shiva83483
      Shiva83483 17 September 2019 20: 14
      +1
      Russia buys a large number of fifth-generation fighter Su-57, clearly preparing for a large-scale armed conflict between major powers.

      Well, of course 76 aircraft is clearly for a world war, the whole world is in ruins)))
      Reply
      ..but then...
    8. businessv
      businessv 17 September 2019 21: 03
      0
      Quote: figvam
      Well, of course 76 aircraft is clearly for a world war, the whole world is in ruins)))

      Yeah, but then! good
    9. tatarin_ru
      tatarin_ru 17 September 2019 22: 16
      0
      This opinion was expressed by The National Interest expert Charlie Gao.

      And who is it ? I have never heard of this. Why do they add the word expert to any surname? It's like we have a "comrade" or "master".

      In general, only British and American talking heads escalate about a big war. Chet Trump does not fulfill his campaign promises, does not give money, or not to everyone. Honestly already tired.
      1. Paranoid50
        Paranoid50 18 September 2019 09: 42
        +5
        Quote: tatarin_ru
        And who is it ? I haven’t heard about this at all.

        Another "mixed expert". Charlie Gao, Dave Majmudar, Dmitry Simes ... there is a lot of missing Mustafa Nechiporenko. yes
    10. YOUR
      YOUR 18 September 2019 01: 17
      +3
      It is interesting in their opinion what the purchase of more than 310 Ф-35 indicates (data at the end of 2018 g). Total produced 425 units.
      Maybe for agricultural use?
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 19 September 2019 07: 26
        0
        The Americans are modernizing the fleet, the Russian Federation is modernizing the fleet. An article from the yellow pages.
    11. Vanek
      Vanek 18 September 2019 03: 37
      0
      Quote: figvam
      Well, of course


      Let's hit it. And more than once.

      Quote: figvam
      the whole world to dust)


      But then.

      laughing hi
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 19 September 2019 07: 27
        -2
        The Nazis thought in similar categories, don't you think? The crazy “leader” gave orders to destroy fields, factories, and food stores. “There will be me, the Germans also have nothing to catch” - his inflamed logic. We see what the Germans feel now. The fourth economy of the world, good relations with all countries.
        Just the winners were adequate people.
        We must be able to, including, and lose, IMHO.
        What did the inhabitants of Brazil, Indonesia, and South Africa prevent you from doing? And fellow citizens in the name of what are you going to burn? It is irresponsible to say so.
    12. Guillon
      Guillon 18 September 2019 10: 37
      +3
      The preparations for war are evidenced by the pairing of Fu-35 to NATO allies and the spread of American missiles! fool stop
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 19 September 2019 12: 26
        0
        Does the desire to update one’s fleet of aircraft for some and earn / reduce the cost of a larger series of others mean preparation for war? There is clearly not without the Masons)
    13. Alex Justice
      Alex Justice 18 September 2019 10: 54
      +4
      Australia bought 100 F35. It is not otherwise prepared to conquer the whole world. laughing
    14. Tenet
      Tenet 19 September 2019 01: 19
      0
      THIS IS NOT FOR YOU ... feel
  2. Kasym
    Kasym 17 September 2019 18: 40
    +11
    I wonder what the author will say about the presence of the F-22 in the US Air Force, and the newest F-35 purchased by the Pentagon, and in much larger quantities? These are probably the "doves of peace".
    1. Shuttle
      Shuttle 17 September 2019 18: 46
      +4
      Quote: Kasym
      I wonder what the author will say about the presence of the F-22 in the US Air Force, and the newest F-35 purchased by the Pentagon, and in much larger quantities? These are probably the "doves of peace".

      No, what are you! This is thanksgiving turkey (turkey on the beneficence day). Yeah!
    2. NKT
      NKT 17 September 2019 18: 53
      +7
      Everything fits well into the American "logic." Several hundred of the latest aircraft and 600 bases around the world - this is only to "maintain" this very American world, and two bases and 76 aircraft - this is preparation for war.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 17 September 2019 19: 00
        +6
        Quote: NKT
        it’s only for “maintaining” this very American world

        But what about.
        I came in peace! laughing
      2. vik669
        vik669 17 September 2019 22: 05
        +5
        This kind of logic speaks of their level of mental development, so there is nothing to expect from these urs except Pods and 76 but 760 SU-57, since cattle only understand the stick!
        1. 3danimal
          3danimal 19 September 2019 07: 36
          -2
          At 760 you (and most Russians) will have to sit on pasta all their lives and dress in the products of the Bolshevik factory)
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 17 September 2019 19: 03
      +4
      Quote: Kasym
      I wonder what the author will say about the presence of the F-22 in the US Air Force, and the newest F-35 purchased by the Pentagon, and in much larger quantities? These are probably the "doves of peace".

      This is against Iran and the Papuans of New Guinea, as well as the bases near our borders. Didn't you know? wassat
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 17 September 2019 20: 03
        +5
        Quote: NEXUS
        It is against Iran and the Papuans of New Guinea

        Here panemash is a new threat to democracy. The Himalayas are growing, hence the Yeti population is increasing. The Yankees do not know how to deal with them, so they bake their penguins in order to say with pathos that they say that only the Invisible can destroy the Invisible bully
    4. poquello
      poquello 17 September 2019 19: 07
      +4
      Quote: Kasym
      I wonder what the author will say about the presence of the F-22 in the US Air Force, and the newest F-35 purchased by the Pentagon, and in much larger quantities? These are probably the "doves of peace".

      the author suggests that f22 with f35 by that time already rot
    5. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 22: 57
      -2
      They plan to replace almost all fighters with 35 mixtures: F-15 / 16 / 18. ~ 2000 doesn't work out that much.
      1. mister-red
        mister-red 18 September 2019 10: 58
        +1
        The US Air Force currently has 1600 fighters.
        1. 3danimal
          3danimal 18 September 2019 12: 44
          -1
          And besides the Air Force, there is Naval Aviation (F-18) and KMP (these also want to replace the Harriers). And everything fits into the general logic.
      2. Horon
        Horon 18 September 2019 15: 27
        +2
        Will the Su-57 also replace older planes that have already exhausted their resources, or will Russia not age planes?
        1. 3danimal
          3danimal 22 September 2019 17: 44
          0
          That's right. And the mentioned edition is “yellow pages”.
          Jane's needs to be analyzed, not Speedinfo)
  3. Reserve officer
    Reserve officer 17 September 2019 18: 41
    +5
    One must always be ready for war. Especially surrounded by democratic partners and their sixes.
  4. Andrey Chistyakov
    Andrey Chistyakov 17 September 2019 18: 41
    +7
    Yeah. The USA is the most "peaceful" nation in the world ...
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 18 September 2019 12: 47
      -4
      In different historical periods, different countries behaved aggressively.
      For example, you do not believe that the Union performed an international duty in Afghanistan? And what about the million dead and refugees?
      There are no clean ones. Unless Monaco, any.
  5. Alexey RA
    Alexey RA 17 September 2019 18: 43
    +9
    According to the American expert, Russia's purchase of a large number of Su-57 fighters clearly indicates that the country is preparing for an armed conflict with a major power.

    Trunks! It is petty! ©
    We need to think more globally: everything that Russia does or does not clearly indicates that the country is preparing for an armed conflict with a major power. laughing
  6. Irokez
    Irokez 17 September 2019 18: 43
    +2
    if Russia finds a foreign buyer for it, the cost of these machines will decrease significantly, which will lead to an increase in supplies to the Russian army.

    Moscow, too, was not built immediately. And do not forget that there will be Su-35 and analogues that will be no worse than any penguins.
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 22: 59
      -1
      First, 35-mu need to get a radar with AFAR
  7. Tusv
    Tusv 17 September 2019 18: 44
    +2
    Si vis pacem, bellum for

    Not. we are preparing for peace, and so everything is right
  8. Nycomed
    Nycomed 17 September 2019 18: 45
    +1
    A strange expert ...
    1. Nychego
      Nychego 17 September 2019 19: 30
      +5
      NI - the famous yellow trash. Once again, I grieve that the topwar picks up everything on it ....
    2. sgapich
      sgapich 17 September 2019 22: 46
      +3
      Quote: Nycomed
      A strange expert ...


      Student of the Jagiellonian University in the program "International Security and Development Studies"
  9. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 17 September 2019 18: 46
    +4
    Well, yes, their defense budget speaks exclusively of peaceful purposes, right sweethearts!
  10. Mordvin 3
    Mordvin 3 17 September 2019 18: 46
    +4
    Yeah, until the 28th year of the 76 Su-57. Here, the American vice president has just stated that the American troops, in connection with the attacks on the Saudis, are in full combat readiness. It seems that the bombing of Iran is not far off.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 17 September 2019 21: 16
      +2
      Well, let’s try - Israel and Saudi Arabia will fly to the maximum in this case, Iran has more than 1200 BRDS Shihab-2 Shihab-3, Sajjil 1 and Sajjil 2 with a flight range of up to 2500 kilometers. The American Patriots have already shown their inefficiency against drones and KR - against such weapons, the interception efficiency will generally drop to 5% maximum.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 17 September 2019 21: 24
        +5
        Quote: Vadim237
        Well, let them try

        They can. Trump said that Washington will soon find out who is behind this attack. They will again boom in the UN with test tubes, I suppose.
        1. Nychego
          Nychego 18 September 2019 01: 01
          +2
          Quote: Mordvin 3
          They will again boom in the UN with test tubes, I suppose.

          This time they crave first, and then they will rattle with something.
      2. 3danimal
        3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 01
        0
        As they say in Israel: we don’t have nuclear weapons, but in extreme cases we will use it. ”
        They have a lot of air defense, the same Iron Dome. And the preparation of calculations at the level - regularly it turns out to practice.
      3. 3danimal
        3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 05
        0
        This is something from the category: “M-16 with 200 cannot penetrate tight clothes” (met like that).
        SAM systems are being improved, a lot depends on the preparation of the calculation.
  11. AU Ivanov.
    AU Ivanov. 17 September 2019 18: 48
    +3
    If you want peace, get ready for war. Ancient truth.
  12. The comment was deleted.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 17 September 2019 19: 17
      +1
      Quote: Larkis
      While Lisa Peskova and others like her in the glorious cities of Paryzhi and Londonimy, there will be no war ..

      Quote: Larkis
      ... change methodology ....

      Well, here ... I answered myself, practically yes
      1. 3danimal
        3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 14
        -3
        But really, isn’t this an indicator that nothing serious is expected?
        In the place of that side, in the event of a serious aggravation, all these “children” would have been taken to the places of the main targets of the Russian missiles. To demoralize officials.
        Now, if the "golden children" urgently get on their beloved (from afar) country, then this will be a bad signal.
  13. APASUS
    APASUS 17 September 2019 18: 53
    +5
    The National Interest and expert Charlie Gao have such savage logic that it is the procurement of Su-57 that prepares the country for war, but the procurement of F-35 does not prepare for war along the way? Probably the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty, such a peaceful action ............. laughing laughing laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  14. demo
    demo 17 September 2019 18: 57
    +1
    They scared themselves.
    They themselves are afraid.
    1. Vanek
      Vanek 18 September 2019 03: 45
      0
      Well, the duck itself will not be praised, nor will anyone praise.

      hi
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. Thrifty
    Thrifty 17 September 2019 19: 00
    0
    And we just have been living for a long time on the principle-you want peace-prepare for war! Yankees, it’s high time to learn by heart. ...
  17. Non liberoid Russian
    Non liberoid Russian 17 September 2019 19: 01
    +2
    logic 80 lvl ..... and the purchase of f-35 is so, they wanted to fly
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 16
      -4
      Count how many F-15 / 16 / 18 are in service now - they will be replaced by 35-mi. And 2000 + doesn’t work out that much.
      1. Non liberoid Russian
        Non liberoid Russian 18 September 2019 09: 27
        0
        change))) irons and air irons
  18. K-50
    K-50 17 September 2019 19: 04
    +1
    Russia buys a large number of fifth-generation fighter Su-57, clearly preparing for a large-scale armed conflict between major powers. Such an opinion was expressed by Charlie Gao, an expert at The National Interest.

    Mr. Evidence? belay fellow laughing
    Armies are always preparing for war, and weapons are being purchased for this. In any Army !!!
    Pin dos also buys 5-generation aircraft so what? And, they are preparing for the export of democracy !!! fellow lol
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 17
      -2
      They are democracies, we are leaderism and spirituality. Everyone has something to offer)
  19. Sergei 23
    Sergei 23 17 September 2019 19: 07
    -2
    And in the event that Russia finds a foreign buyer on it, the cost of these cars will decrease significantly ....... One would like to ask A ,, Where is Dim’s money ,,
  20. Arthur 85
    Arthur 85 17 September 2019 19: 09
    +1
    Well, if 760, then maybe that would be enough. And if 1760, well, then really, maybe we’re getting ready.
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 19
      -1
      The budget will not allow. It is difficult to compete in the purchase of "tuned guns" (conditionally) with those who are richer in 10 times.
      For the defense and the specified amount is enough.
  21. Kontrik
    Kontrik 17 September 2019 19: 14
    +2
    Russia buys a large number of fifth-generation fighter Su-57, clearly preparing for a large-scale armed conflict between major powers.

    Do not tell my vest, the western inhabitants ..What will happen will surprise and amaze you all very much .. There will be no arms race from our Russia hi
    You will destroy yourself. (How? There are ways) ... And we will observe how you watched and pushed the collapse of the USSR and your hands rubbed robbing us soldier
    These are the things Russia will have in the future. No offense!
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 29
      -3
      Ideal scenario) Defeat the strong (industry, total army), the rich and the inexpensive. Just how? Wait until the "dollar collapses"? Or will there be oil at 500 $ and the EU will be asked to enter a new FD? )
      Similar reasoning suggests that there are no intellectuals on the other side. Incorrect installation.
      And then, if there are no Geliks, what will our golden youth ride on? At UAZ, GreatWall? This is for the layman)
    2. Greenwood
      Greenwood 18 September 2019 08: 39
      -4
      What will happen will surprise and amaze you all very much ..

      You will destroy yourself. (How? There are ways) ... And we will observe how you watched and pushed the collapse of the USSR and your hands rubbed robbing us

      And then I woke up. lol
      These are the things Russia has in the future

      I remember, once communism was promised to us by 2000, yes.
  22. Doliva63
    Doliva63 17 September 2019 19: 19
    +1
    "... the defense budget of Russia is by no means comparable to the Soviet one ..." - here I agree, the fall of industry to the level of the plinth is obvious.
    "if Russia finds a foreign buyer for it, the cost of these cars will decrease significantly" - and here I agree, the decline in the culture of the Russian language is also obvious.
    I want to go where there was order with industry and they wrote in Russian without errors!
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 30
      -2
      Industry is not needed, top officials said that we are an energy superpower. We must believe them.
      1. Doliva63
        Doliva63 18 September 2019 20: 14
        -4
        Quote: 3danimal
        Industry is not needed, top officials said that we are an energy superpower. We must believe them.

        Well, it looks like we believe them, if almost 30 vote for them laughing Only the farther into the forest, the more we turn into monkeys, didn’t you notice?
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 18 September 2019 20: 29
          +5
          Quote: 3danimal
          Industry is not needed, top officials said that we are an energy superpower. Gotta believe them

          Well, okay - this is a well-known trollik from Ukraine. Oh yeah .. belay

          Quote: Doliva63
          Well, it looks like we believe them ...

          You, in any way, also moved there? Pure soul? wink

          Quote: Doliva63
          we are turned into monkeys

          And, it seems, not unsuccessfully.

          PS: not "us", but you yes
          1. Doliva63
            Doliva63 18 September 2019 20: 42
            -2
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            Quote: 3danimal
            Industry is not needed, top officials said that we are an energy superpower. Gotta believe them

            Well, okay - this is a well-known trollik from Ukraine. Oh yeah .. belay

            Quote: Doliva63
            Well, it looks like we believe them ...

            You, in any way, also moved there? Pure soul? wink

            Quote: Doliva63
            we are turned into monkeys

            And, it seems, not unsuccessfully.

            PS: not "us", but you yes

            Well, since you don’t notice this, you are already halfway to the goal, so to speak.
            And with Ukraine, I’m always with my soul - there lives a lot of my college friends, army colleagues, and from there comes my father.
            And you, when you grow up, grow wiser with time, I hope.
            I am taking my leave for the sim, please do not disturb me anymore.
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 18 September 2019 21: 08
              +4
              Quote: Doliva63
              please do not disturb anymore

              With pleasure stop
          2. 3danimal
            3danimal 20 September 2019 05: 23
            0
            From the Krasnoyarsk Territory. And the thief always screams “Hold the thief”)
        2. 3danimal
          3danimal 18 September 2019 20: 42
          -2
          Not 30, but only 20. There was a bad Yeltsin, put on his knees, appointed Putin, he lifted from his knees. On TV they say so)
          1. Doliva63
            Doliva63 19 September 2019 18: 05
            0
            Quote: 3danimal
            Not 30, but only 20. There was a bad Yeltsin, put on his knees, appointed Putin, he lifted from his knees. On TV they say so)

            Plusanul, but still 30, agree. For we live in the same shit that bad Yeltsin arranged for us, but good Putin keeps him.
        3. Russia
          Russia 18 September 2019 21: 27
          +5
          Quote: Doliva63
          Quote: 3danimal
          Industry is not needed, top officials said that we are an energy superpower. We must believe them.

          Well, it looks like we believe them, if almost 30 vote for them laughing Only the farther into the forest, the more we turn into monkeys, didn’t you notice?

          Undress, look at your hairline. smile
  23. rocket757
    rocket757 17 September 2019 19: 27
    +2
    It seems straight to 2028 and let's get started! By then we’ll decide who to start with!
    In short, the browser is a comedian, it works in the wrong column!
  24. _Ugene_
    _Ugene_ 17 September 2019 19: 28
    0
    Russian purchase of Su-57 fighters speaks of preparations for war
    Russia 76 fighter buys it preparing for war, and the United States 2500 pieces F-35 buys it, definitely preparing for peace
  25. Vasyan1971
    Vasyan1971 17 September 2019 19: 30
    +3
    According to the American expert, Russia's purchase of a large number of Su-57 fighters clearly indicates that the country is preparing for an armed conflict with a major power.

    Aggressors! NATO members who have already purchased fe-35 and other gadgets, what are they preparing for then?
  26. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 17 September 2019 19: 34
    0
    According to the American expert, Russia's purchase of a large number of Su-57 fighters clearly indicates that the country is preparing for an armed conflict with a major power. 76 delivery of such aircraft until the 2028 year.
    Right War, but not earlier than 2028 of the year feel
    1. Grits
      Grits 18 September 2019 02: 01
      0
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Right War, but not earlier than 2028 year

      I’m telling you the truth - next year the Earth will fly on the axis of heaven!
  27. Piramidon
    Piramidon 17 September 2019 19: 42
    +1
    Such an opinion was expressed by Charlie Gao, an expert at The National Interest.

    If you worry about each "expert", you can clink glasses. The more senile the opinion, the more premium it has.
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 32
      0
      NI - local "Yellow Pages" in military subjects. Do not be taken seriously.
  28. bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 17 September 2019 19: 47
    0
    Another Amer paranoia! Not used to that someone can be just as strong and powerful, ready to give in the teeth, that’s what they’ll hurt.
  29. Rwmos
    Rwmos 17 September 2019 19: 48
    +2
    ... and again Russia did not come to war ... And they already drowned the Norwegian frigate in the exercises ...
  30. Ru_Na
    Ru_Na 17 September 2019 19: 52
    0
    Well, the fact that the United States buys hundreds of F-35s is such a trifle, because the US officials are "peacekeepers" and carry democracy under the wings of their aircraft!
  31. Timon2155
    Timon2155 17 September 2019 20: 12
    0
    Why listen to these ikperds !? Send in three letters and do your job!
  32. codetalker
    codetalker 17 September 2019 20: 32
    +1
    And NATO, in this case, be led to war with alien invaders?)
    The author points out that the Su-57 development program turned out to be so lengthy due to the fact that the fighter used the latest technologies, the development of which takes time. In the end, he adds, “the Russians” turned out to be a plane stuffed with the best technologies that the Russian aerospace industry can offer: powerful engines, brilliant maneuverability, first-class avionics, including radars with an active phased array.

    Strange, but the “patriotic”-minded experts in Russia said that this was all because they had stolen everything, but they were showing some models and cartoons ...
  33. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 17 September 2019 20: 50
    +1
    If tomorrow is war, if tomorrow is camping, be ready for the campaign today.
  34. Pavel57
    Pavel57 17 September 2019 21: 06
    0
    It is necessary to involve the Turks in the theme of Su-57 then it will be more and cheaper.
  35. Tuareg72
    Tuareg72 17 September 2019 21: 07
    +1
    Well, with shitty amersky weapons and 76 aircraft this is a GREAT problem! Recognize yourself!
  36. Rostislav
    Rostislav 17 September 2019 21: 09
    +1
    Once again, the penguins expose themselves.
    If the purchase of a large number of fighters (57 units is already a lot belay ) means preparation for war, the United States, it turns out, has long been openly preparing for it. And he pushes partners to this, delivering them these aircraft.
    Again "iksperd" the secret plans of the Pentagon burned laughing
  37. 7 poplar
    7 poplar 17 September 2019 21: 31
    0
    and the purchase of f35 does not mean anything ???????
  38. Alien From
    Alien From 17 September 2019 21: 58
    +1
    So how do they buy their 35 mattresses and sell it to everyone, that’s democracy, and how we, for ourselves, do it, we’re getting ready for war ..... peace-loving sworn friends! Right Sergey Lavrov, right !!!!!
  39. comradChe
    comradChe 17 September 2019 22: 04
    0
    Flattering speeches from the lips of the enemy - a reason to think.
  40. Pacifist with AK
    Pacifist with AK 17 September 2019 22: 28
    0
    Anecdote from the Pacifist: - Sonya, are you sick? A doctor came out of you early in the morning.
    “Listen, Sim, what if a military man came out of you early in the morning, so did the war begin?”
  41. Chaldon48
    Chaldon48 17 September 2019 22: 36
    +1
    The United States has been cooperating with Ukraine for too long, and this negatively affects the psyche of the American expert community. They correctly say that mental illness is also contagious. It has long been noticed that any, even the most insignificant movement of troops from east to west in Russia causes panic in Ukraine, and even the appearance of a tank, real or imaginary, the tank has the ability to move from place to place, is perceived as undisguised aggression. The war would have already begun long ago, if our leadership had begun to react in the same way, for example, to what is happening in the Baltic states.
    1. 3danimal
      3danimal 17 September 2019 23: 34
      0
      NI a is not an expert community. Read better Jane's.
  42. Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 17 September 2019 22: 38
    +1
    And how did this, the idea, not be picked up by Ukrainian media? :-)
    What a fertile ground!
    ,, Russia is preparing to seize Zhmerynka and Kryzhopol! ,, :-)
  43. Rabioso
    Rabioso 18 September 2019 00: 14
    -1
    Just some laughter. Russia at the moment can quite successfully fight with the former Soviet republics but not with NATO or the states.
    1. bukhach
      bukhach 18 September 2019 01: 00
      +2
      If you mean the war by conventional means, then you may be right. But at the moment Russia is capable of causing irreparable damage to the United States and other NATO countries, isn’t this destroying the enemy a success? .
  44. iouris
    iouris 18 September 2019 01: 39
    0
    The purchase of Su-57 speaks of high readiness for war ... USA.
  45. Evil 55
    Evil 55 18 September 2019 02: 31
    +1
    Well, of course ... 76 machines before the 2028 of the year in Russia are a clear preparation for war, and the 130 F-35 of the year is a peaceful effort to spread democracy to US-controlled territories ..
    1. DDT
      DDT 18 September 2019 03: 04
      +1
      well said, +. At first I didn’t notice the comment, so I wrote in the same vein.
  46. Lieutenant colonel
    Lieutenant colonel 18 September 2019 02: 58
    0
    I was always surprised by the "curvature" of such experts - we make airplanes - that means we are preparing for war. The US makes planes - are they preparing for peace? We are monitoring the FBI - and they are not following the FSB or the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs ?! We are increasing the number of air defense systems (purely defensive weapons) - so we will attack the Tiribals !!!
    Bullshit!
  47. DDT
    DDT 18 September 2019 03: 03
    +1
    Well, Charlie Gao needs to explain the essence of the proverb - "if you want peace, get ready for war" ... In the course of Charlie probably played Generals or some other computer game? In general, the fact that the United States has 220 F-22 fighters and 1K F-35 is on its way, is it probably "peace enforcement"? crying
    And along the way, Russia should be proud if 76 dryers scared the "enemy" so much, this means that one Su-57 is in battle 5 F-22 ... well, we won't even count the F-35, one burst like meat on a skewer ... Well, this, they will bring down bundles wassat
  48. sleeve
    sleeve 18 September 2019 05: 00
    0
    Well, damn it, man, even in the late autumn of the road, we are filling ourselves with snow ... You yourself understand, we are preparing for war. We begin to consume more vodka in the cold, you know, fighting excitement, everything is for war for war. Well, 76 aircraft is not for the brave aviation industry not to bend. This is certainly for war. What’s in people’s head? really want to fight? Or is it scary on the contrary? There is an understanding. What overseas will arrive and arrive thoroughly?
  49. sagitch
    sagitch 18 September 2019 07: 02
    -1
    To create - in order to destroy everything then ... including yourself and your children - is the lot of mankind?
    Or is chaos still a re-creation of something new?
  50. Maalkavianin
    Maalkavianin 18 September 2019 07: 57
    -1
    Purchasing is not an indicator. Although, yes, the war will be 100%.