The bridge across the Sevastopol bay. Heroic past and possible future

38
In December 2018, messages flashed in the information field that the construction of the Sevastopol bridge was not just another unrealizable idea, but that organizations involved in the construction of the Crimean bridge and cable-stayed bridge on Russky Island in Vladivostok had already joined the design. The very expediency of the construction is due to the geography of the city of Sevastopol, which is actually divided into two parts. In fact, the huge urban organism of our base of the Black Sea fleet actually lives in a state of transport disunity. In order to get through Inkerman from the northern part of the city to the southern (or vice versa) at rush hour or during bad weather, you will have to spend up to two hours. A similar state for the industrial sea city and the fleet base, apart from the needs of ordinary citizens, naturally negatively affects many areas of Sevastopol’s life.

The bridge across the Sevastopol bay. Heroic past and possible future

Image of the Sevastopol bridge from the press service of the government of Sevastopol



Plans for the construction of the Sevastopol bridge periodically began to appear at the level of proposals and initiatives immediately after the Great Patriotic War. But each time the idea came across both technical difficulties and opposition from the fleet command. The military commanders quite reasonably believed that the outbreak of hostilities would destroy the erected bridge, and its wreckage, in turn, would block warships in the bay, like a cork in a bottle.

At the moment, the situation has changed, and the location of many objects, and the technology itself. The most economical option, taking into account the interests of all parties to the project, including the fleet, was ultimately considered the option of building a cable-stayed bridge. The proposed parameters of the future object were also announced: the length along with approaches of about 4 kilometers, 4 lanes, bicycle paths, and entry and exit points will be located in the areas of Brestskaya (southern part of the city) and Bogdanov (northern part).



On April 22 of the 2019 of the year, as the press center of the Federal State Institution “Main Directorate of State Expertise” stated, the experts of the Crimean branch of the Glavgosexpertiza of Russia issued a positive opinion on conducting a public technological and price audit of the investment project at the first stage of the construction of the transport passage through the Sevastopol Bay.

In general, it seems that the project to be. Of course, if the home-grown opposition, protesting about and without and encouraged by the rage in Moscow, the closure of the cathedral project in Yekaterinburg (under the irrational howl from different parts of the country) and the notably spoiled blood of the builders of the Tominsky GOK, does not plan to sabotage this project. Of course, do not forget about the pseudo-ecologists of home bottling. It’s not long to recall how many copies were broken about the Crimean bridge, which, according to “ecologists,” “killed” crabs and dolphins. True, it later turned out that the Ukrainian sailors freed from the Mordor were involved in the death of dolphins.

However, let us turn our eyes to the past: after all, the bridge over the Sevastopol Bay was once already thrown. And it was built under the most tragic circumstances.

Bridges of a warring city


It was the 1854 year, the Crimean War was blazing. The brave Sevastopol frantically fought off the superior troops of Britain, France, the Ottoman Empire and the Sardinian kingdom. The defense demanded mobility from the troops, but the Sevastopol Bay, which cuts deep into the land, cut by peculiar southern “fjords,” often deprived the defenders of the ability to quickly transfer troops from one side of the bay to the other, not to mention the timely evacuation of the wounded. Then the idea arose to tie the land indented with bays by temporary bridges.

The first bridge was built in September 1854 year in the southern bay of Sevastopol. This facility was actively exploited until the end of March 1855. On March 28, the second intensified bombardment of the heroic fortified city began, lasting ten days. During this time, in Sevastopol, the enemy fired 165 of thousands of artillery shots. An avalanche of metal unprecedented until then in stories siege wars, completely destroyed the South Bay Bridge.


Floating Bridges South Bay

The initiative to build the next bridge was made by Admiral Pavel Stepanovich Nakhimov himself. He proposed the construction of a crossing in the depths of the same South Bay. The bridge was also floating and anchored. Much later than the events of the Crimean War in the 80 of the 20 century, one of the anchors of this bridge was discovered by workers during the repair of the railway. Later, this anchor was installed on Historical Boulevard near the building of the panorama "Defense of Sevastopol 1854-1855 years."

The next construction began in February of the 1855 year. This time it was erected for quick and reliable communication with the line of defense of the Selenginsky and Volyn redoubts, located northeast of the Kilen bay. This bridge was used until May of the 1855 year.

But the most famous was the bridge across the Sevastopol Bay, stretching from south to north. 1855-th - the second year of the heroic defense of Sevastopol. Britain, France, the Ottoman Porta and Sardinia, for which the siege of one single city by superior forces had already turned into a real shame, continued with angry persistence to attack the Russian garrison. The last months of the epoch-making battle came. The clear advantage on the side of the Anglo-French forces was already undeniable.



The communication between the North and South sides of Sevastopol every day more and more complicated, and the prospect of evacuating troops from the southern part of the city became an urgent need. In July, Lieutenant General Buchmeyer came up with the initiative to extend the floating bridge from the Nikolaev to the Mikhailovsky battery. The command in the person of Prince Alexander Mikhailovich Gorchakov decided to approve this initiative, despite the critical views of many engineers who believed that the bridge would either be blown apart by a wave, or it would not be built in principle.

The construction leadership of such a complex facility in those conditions was entrusted directly to the initiator - Lieutenant General Alexander Efimovich Bukhmeyer, who in the future will join the galaxy of heroes of Sevastopol. The senior officers, Captain-Lieutenant Pavel Ivanovich Kupriyanov (will later become Rear Admiral), captain of the 2 rank Ivan Fedorovich Likhachev (will resign with the rank of Vice Admiral, will be a member of Russian and French geographical societies), and a hundred sailors of the Navy crews, sappers of the 4th battalion, soldiers of the 45th squad of the Kursk militia and about a hundred carpenters.


From left to right: Bukhmeyer, Kupriyanov and Likhachev

The bridge was built quickly enough, given the circumstances. Timber, for example, had to be delivered from Kherson in carts. They started work on the 14 of July, and the first fighters were able to cross the bridge on the 15 of the 1855 of August. As a result, the total length of the bridge was 450 fathoms (960 meters). The bridge itself consisted of 86 rafts, each 5 meters wide and 13 meters long. The bridge was kept afloat by anchors. The location of the bridge itself, i.e. on a fairly wide section of the bay, it was by no means accidental. The floating passage for the Russian troops began right at the rounding of the massif of the Nikolaev battery, i.e. the battery itself became a cover from artillery fire to begin the crossing.

Tragic retreat


On the 24 of August (the 4 of September), the sixth bombardment of Sevastopol began, effectively wiping the artillery of the Malakhov Kurgan from the face of the earth, and turning the positions themselves into piles of ruins. But only on 27 of August after a heavy battle did the enemy manage to capture the mound and break through the defenses. Prince Gorchakov gave the order to leave positions on the southern side of Sevastopol.


View of the retreat over the floating bridge and the burning South side of Sevastopol

In the evening twilight of 27 on August, a rocket soared into the sky - a signal for a retreat, which was met with hostility by many soldiers and officers. Senior officers had to almost force some of the defenders of Sevastopol to begin crossing the bridge. A strong northeast wind rose in the bay, catching a wave. The bridge shook violently under the weight of people and wagons. In some areas, the crossing swept over the wave. Therefore, teams of sailors and sappers quickly increased the buoyancy of such areas with pre-prepared tarred barrels.

Together with the defenders of Sevastopol, civilians walked along the bridge, who were allowed to take only the luggage that fit in their hands. All this sad and solemn march went to the accompaniment of the cannonade and the illumination of the burning South side of the city.

Troops consisting of infantry, artillerymen, sappers and sailors remained on the south side to cover the retreat. The cover group was commanded by General Alexander Petrovich Khrushchev (held the City side of the South Bay) and General Alexander Ivanovich Shepelev (defended the Ship side of the South Bay). They were instructed to destroy everything possible, so that the enemy did not get trophies. To do this, special teams of “hunters” were allocated, who burned powder cellars, destroyed artillery pieces that were impossible to transport, and undermined whole batteries.



Already late at night, a second signal was given by a rocket, which meant an order to retreat to the cover forces. All this time, Lieutenant General Alexander Buchmeyer was directly on the bridge, leading the crossing, created in the end only for this fiery night. By eight o’clock in the morning, the last defenders of Sevastopol finally appeared, who managed to retreat along the Buchmeyer floating bridge. It was a detachment of fighters of the Tobolsk regiment, Colonel Alexander Alexandrovich Zelena, followed by General Khrushchev, commander of the City Side forces group.


Memorial sign at the beginning of the floating bridge on the south side of Sevastopol

Bukhmeyer gave the order to build the bridge as soon as Khrushchev approached him, saying that the South side was left. The bridge ceased to exist. But still, the last who left South Sevastopol were the aforementioned "hunters" who remained to eliminate infrastructure, ammunition, and weapons. Only closer to noon, when the blown up powder cellars and burning batteries intertwined in one raging fire, the teams of hunters crossed to the North side on rowing ships.

The Sevastopol fire of the 1855 year burned for two whole days, not allowing the enemy all the while to fully occupy the southern side of the hero city. Thus ended the history of Sevastopol bridges, and their new peaceful history, perhaps, is only just beginning ...
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    19 August 2019 05: 38
    home-grown opposition, protesting about and without and encouraged by the rage in Moscow, the closure of the project of the cathedral in Yekaterinburg (under the irrational howl from different parts of the country)
    Well, you damn compared. Really needed to solve the transport problems of the city bridge and what for nobody use the cathedral. We have a similar situation in Vladivostok. They built three good bridges (though one of them regularly patches pits, alas), no one was against it. But now another temple is pounding near the central square (on the parking spot), what for is not needed there.
    1. +11
      19 August 2019 07: 46
      Quote: Greenwood
      But now another temple is pounding near the central square (on the parking spot), what for is not needed there.

      How do I like this stupid howl, on the one hand, on the other hand, I don’t like it ...
      FOR EVERYONE, the Temple in Yekaterinburg was a COVERAGE for the construction of a large complex of buildings consisting of two thirty-story residential buildings, an office center and the Temple. And this complex would deprive citizens of their beloved and very beautiful vacation spot. So, that the overwhelming majority of Yekaterinburg residents did not speak out against the Temple, but build it to the joy of believers, only in a different place, but FOR the preservation of this square., The photo is circled by a red line
      1. +6
        19 August 2019 09: 02
        So for such a building, they usually choose the most delicious and tidbits in the city center. It is clear that if there was a wasteland on the outskirts, no one would have said a word. Build at least a temple, at least a mosque, at least the tower of Sauron. And in Vlad in the same way.
        1. +3
          19 August 2019 12: 08
          Actually, this building on the square is as unnecessary as the ugly Hyatt near the bridge. We have a disaster in the city with architecture and urban planning. But no one raised questions about the need to build bridges. They really have a lot of benefits. I wish Sevastopol to feel this.
          1. +3
            19 August 2019 14: 32
            And what, the capacity (and most importantly Technology) of bridge builders is very easy to lose. As they did in the USSR, a specialized construction department (say, for the construction of oil refineries) builds refineries in one city, and then, after completion, this “camp” is removed and begins to build refineries in another city. It is effective and most importantly cheap! Also with bridges, so many organizations all over Russia gathered for the construction of the Crimean bridge and now these organizations, like cockroaches, will again need to be assembled. And the Sevastopol bridge is smaller and therefore less expensive. In a word (my humble opinion, of course) the second Crimean bridge to be !!! good
            1. +1
              19 August 2019 23: 33
              Quote: Proxima
              As they did in the USSR, a specialized construction department (say, for the construction of oil refineries) builds refineries in one city, and then, after completion, this “camp” is removed and begins to build refineries in another city. It is effective and most importantly cheap!

              I agree to all 100! I recall how in the early 80s a new boiler house was built in the town, and a team of specialists came to make a pipe out of brick. They paid them a lot! But in conversations I learned that there are no more than six such brigades in the entire Union!
  2. -6
    19 August 2019 08: 09
    and what for nobody use the cathedral

    how does it bother you all that the Russian people want to become Orthodox again
    1. +3
      19 August 2019 08: 14
      Quote: War Builder
      how does it bother you all that the Russian people want to become Orthodox again

      And for this it is necessary with this people to act as at the first baptism - "with fire and sword", like it or not, or go into the river and be baptized, or under the sword? I didn’t notice that we would somehow oppress the faithful of the canonical churches, it is necessary, a procession of the cross, we need to kuyram-bairam, but please, we will shut it down and carry it out.
      Forcing it is not necessary. People themselves must come to God, and not under a stick.
      1. -4
        19 August 2019 08: 17
        I also didn’t notice that someone was dragged by force into the Orthodox church, except for the demoniac
        1. +4
          19 August 2019 08: 23
          Quote: War Builder
          I also didn’t notice that someone was dragged by force into the Orthodox church,

          But you stand for it. Sorry, but a resident of Vladivostok understands the problems of his city better. And I, since I lived in those parts for a long time, will support him. In the center of the city of Vladivostok, any construction must be carried out carefully and taking into account the opinion of the townspeople, there is too little space there, too little. And the bulk of the population does not live there, but in the "sleeping areas" on the outskirts. So maybe it's better to build a Temple in one of these areas?
          1. +3
            19 August 2019 09: 09
            Thanks for the support. hi
            Quote: svp67
            In the center of the city of Vladivostok, any construction should be carried out carefully and taking into account the opinion of the townspeople, it is painful there is not enough space, catastrophically little.
            The most annoying thing is that at the end of 00s a convenient parking was made near the square, which was very helpful for those who want to leave their car near the square and go to the fair / about their business. But no, they began to bring back this temple. Its construction right under the square looks especially ridiculous given the fact that the square is called "Square of Fighters for Soviet Power in the Far East." Plus, the square often hosts entertainment events, noisy rock concerts, etc. And the operating temple in this place is clearly not the topic.
            1. +1
              19 August 2019 09: 21
              Quote: Greenwood
              Thanks for the support.

              Yes, not at all.
              Quote: Greenwood
              Most offensive

              I perfectly understand your point of view, as I have repeatedly visited Vladik itself and on this square. With your historical buildings of the center, mountainousness, narrow streets there and huge motorization of the population, this is really a huge problem
              1. +2
                19 August 2019 12: 18
                Moreover, there is a temple near Pokrovsky Park. Could build a new neighborhood on Snegovaya Padi, and that would please those who wish to become Orthodox. No need to grab the land in the center.
                1. 0
                  20 August 2019 17: 50
                  It was not by chance that I mentioned the Snowfall, as it adjoins the area of ​​the Second River, in which the only religious institution is a converted kindergarten. In Soviet times, it was almost the only institution with speech therapy specialization ... There are no other Orthodox institutions in a huge area. This is for those who are worried about insufficient Orthodox faith.
          2. 0
            19 August 2019 15: 29
            In the center of the city of Vladivostok, any construction should be carried out carefully and taking into account the opinion of the townspeople, it is painful there is not enough space, catastrophically little.

            Reckoning for a stupid decision to make Vladivostok a regional center. The city inevitably began to grow by leaps and bounds. And nowhere to grow on the hills. Yes, and on the peninsula. Ussuriysk could take the role of the regional center. Located on the plain. There you can safely build a metropolis.
            1. +1
              20 August 2019 17: 40
              Ussuriysk regularly floods, and the problem is not where the regional center will be, and not even where the capital of the Far East will be. Yes, let it be in Khabarovsk ... the problem is that the Russian Orthodox Church and the authorities represented by United Russia, with all my tolerant attitude ... They do everything to hate them.
              I am an "Orthodox atheist" who respects both Hanukkah and Kurban Bayram. hi
              And there is no need to impose ... as Greenwood pointed out, "We have officially separated the church from the state," therefore, the excessive imposition of ANY religion, as well as the denial of it, is UNACCEPTABLE.
              I apologize for the caps, but it was necessary.
    2. +5
      19 August 2019 09: 05
      Quote: War Builder
      Russian people want to become Orthodox again
      It’s not for you to decide what the Russian people want and what the Russian people don’t want. No need to speak for everyone. Our church is officially separated from the state. The imposition of the Orthodox religion infringes on my atheist-communist feelings. In addition to the Orthodox, we also have Muslims, Buddhists, Lutherans, etc.
      1. -3
        19 August 2019 09: 36
        Quote: Greenwood
        we still have Muslims, Buddhists, Lutherans, etc.

        And "you" is who, excuse me?

        Quote: Greenwood
        No need to speak for everyone

        Try on yourself ... you definitely will Yes
        1. -1
          19 August 2019 15: 24
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          And "you" is who, excuse me?
          And we are the population of Russia.
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          Try on yourself ... you definitely will
          I tried on you.
          1. -2
            19 August 2019 19: 04
            Quote: Greenwood
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            And "you" is who, excuse me?

            And we are the population of Russia

            Nah ... you are just a small subset of it, the population. From the "bright and clear-eyed" subspecies.

            Quote: Greenwood
            I tried on you

            It seems to you. You still have to grow up to me ... a young man Yes
      2. -3
        19 August 2019 11: 30
        in addition to the Orthodox, we also have Muslims, Buddhists, Lutherans, etc.

        Jews forgot - your ideological inspirers
        1. 0
          19 August 2019 15: 25
          And them too. See how many different denominations.
    3. +2
      19 August 2019 12: 36
      Are you Russian people? ? Temples should not prevent people from living. And do not be like an eyesore.
      1. -1
        19 August 2019 20: 27
        Quote: tralmaster
        Temples should not prevent people from living.
        I just do not understand ... the minusator does not agree with this? Temples must interfere ?! belay
    4. 0
      19 August 2019 20: 21
      Quote: War Builder
      how does it bother you all that the Russian people want to become Orthodox again
      And what, for the Russian people, in order not to stop wanting to become Orthodox again, it is necessary to ruin the square, which, in Yo-burg, and so with Gulkin’s eyes?
      Do not worry you much! They flew away yesterday, consecrated fires. Tomorrow go out.

      ZY
      Of course, we can assume that officials with dignitaries chose the time, after consulting with meteorologists about the rains, but ... wow! All this is sedition! The miracle of sanctification - no other way!
      1. +1
        20 August 2019 17: 56
        I don’t understand how Yuri Alekseevich flew before the chief priest of Roscosmos appeared .... he isn’t ....... some kind of Kramola.
        1. 0
          21 August 2019 14: 54
          Quote: volodimer
          I do not understand how Yuri Alekseevich flew
          In fact, the rocket was consecrated back in the hangar. And ... You look at her from below: she's a cross!
          And Gagarin, as you know, was an active believer ... or is it the dreams of the PGMnutny? ...
    5. 0
      21 August 2019 14: 43
      Quote: War Builder
      how does it bother you all that the Russian people want to become Orthodox again

      I am jarred when in my region in every village there is a ruined centuries-old church, but nobody needs them and nobody restores them. Although it would seem - here is a historically valuable prayer place for you, and the parishioners are in the form of villagers, in which, as a rule, there are no more churches besides this destroy. But in the center of the cities of millionaires, for some reason, directly battles go for a piece of land for the construction of new churches.
      And do not speak for the whole Russian people.
  3. +4
    19 August 2019 08: 19
    Excellent article, thank you!
  4. +3
    19 August 2019 09: 11
    Quote: Olgovich
    Excellent article, thank you!

    Yes indeed!
  5. 0
    19 August 2019 14: 09
    There are claims to the author about the "local home-grown" opposition. Excuse me, who do you count among the local opposition in Sevastopol? And to whom do they oppose? To edros or what? Or the fact that there are 58 churches in Sevastopol and are still sculpted, taking away the best places in the city from local residents and about this there are constant protests in Sevastopol? Write without politics and Orthodox commercial frenzy.
    1. 0
      20 August 2019 18: 02
      Tolerate Orthodox Sevastopol ... you are now at home. Nevertheless, I hope that this is the right choice. I think this is the right choice, and I hope that the pros will outweigh the cons. I want the pros to outweigh the cons. I wish you happiness!
  6. -2
    19 August 2019 15: 29
    Quote: Nonna
    Excuse me, but who do you rank in Sevastopol as local oppositionists?

    These are the offended former officials, pushed away from the trough, and the grief of "militiamen with essbushniki".
  7. -3
    19 August 2019 21: 09
    And for me it will cost. Let them drive through Inkerman, as we do in CAD. And so in this Crimea his values ​​displaced disproportionately. There is extra money, let the Terek runoff be thrown so that the Khokhlov’s legs do not bow for water.
    1. 0
      19 August 2019 23: 17
      Through Inkerman, the detour is only 20 km. It may well do
  8. 0
    19 August 2019 22: 15
    it is believed that if it were not for the possibility of building a bridge for the rapid withdrawal of troops. That the Russian military would not have received an order to retreat from the southern side of the city and give the city back after 3 rebuffed !! assaults.
    Let me remind you that Khrulev managed to repulse the assault and regain the position of all the bastions except the Malakhov Hill, where the zouaves with the other Frenchmen successfully repelled the Khrulev attack by seeding in houses and strengthening their captured positions. And Khrulev without artillery on bare enthusiasm (as usual, Russians have no nifig except heroism) could not smoke them from there. And reinforcements came to the French, not the Russians. Gorchakov ordered to leave the city after the delivery of the key of defense (MK). And thanks to the bridge, the Russians quickly left, leaving teams of hunters in the city completely destroyed by the bombing of the Allies.
    The losses (and each bombing plucked thousands of lives of the defenders of Sevastopol - because the line of fortifications was not the first and not the second, but the last, hastily built near vital communications) ceased. Now the Allies and the Russians were separated by a bay and an impregnable part of the Northern city. Prepared and fortified. Forces to continue the siege or maneuver war were gone. Yes, and desires too. Allied ambitions were satisfied - South side + fleet.
    The bridge was not built for defense, but for retreat and destroyed after it.
    Built taking into account the shelling. Its creator testified that in cases of hits, it is easy to replace a couple of logs and continue to work.
    1. 0
      20 August 2019 18: 20
      "Allied ambitions have been met - South side + fleet." They retained their prestige: Sevastopol was taken, the fleet was destroyed (which is a pity, but in the coming era the steam is already useless). And in fact, except for a part of Crimea and Sevastopol, they did not receive anything. And the evacuation of troops across the bridge to the north side can be compared to the evacuation of troops from Odessa, quickly and efficiently, with a minimum of losses. Could you fight further? They could. The meaning .. is not obvious, the loss does not justify the goal.
  9. 0
    21 August 2019 21: 28
    Vote for the bridge! Nobody asks me, but I still "For". Now only from Art. the bays are ferried to the North. Earlier (in Ukraine, but I didn't tell you this wink ) from Art. the bays went to Uchkuevka on the beach too, but now everything doesn’t go. Through Inkerman it hurts far.