United States Seeking Reasons to Quit START-3

Washington does not rule out the possibility that the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-3) would not be extended. The White House believes that Russia’s development of hypersonic cruise missiles could prevent this, Reuters reports citing a source surrounded by the American president.

Russia's development of hypersonic missiles could interfere with the extension of the START-3 treaty, according to the White House. According to Washington, the Avangard missile system, which will go into service with the Russian Strategic Missile Forces by the end of this year, violates the provisions of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

Meanwhile, the United States itself says that Washington is looking for an excuse not to extend START-3. About this RIA News said Thomas Cantriman, former assistant secretary of state for international security and non-proliferation.

National Security Advisor (John) Bolton is so hostile to any arms control treaty that he will find any excuse and give any arguments, no matter how unrelated they are, to avoid the extension of strategic offensive arms

- he said.

Earlier, unwillingness to extend said John Bolton, who claims that the contract "has flaws." At the same time, the United States does not exclude the development of a new agreement, to which, in addition to Russia, China should join. However, Beijing has already stated that it does not intend to accede to any treaties.

Comments

[SSR]

The White House believes that Russia’s development of hypersonic cruise missiles could prevent this,

But the stripes themselves do not work in this direction))) here are the fold hypocrites.
If they were ahead of everyone, they would find another excuse, dull.

[Sky strike fighter]

So they want by hook or by crook to slow down the development of hypersonic technologies in our country, and they themselves are developing them at an accelerated pace. Blackmail by breaking START-3 is just a ploy to achieve US dominance in the field of hypersonic technologies. The Americans will also break START-3. But they see our desire to come to an agreement and play on it against us. We still don’t agree on anything since they don’t want to agree on anything. The ideology of domination is in the way. They are hegemons. They will only agree to our complete surrender. There is nothing to talk to them about.

[maxim947]

Considering that they are not doing very well with strategic weapons in terms of the presence of a large number of products that are at the limit and beyond the operational life, and the absence of a new class of missiles, it can be assumed that there could not be without a strong military lobby in America, there can be a lot of money make money. And the mouthpiece of this lobby is none other than John Bolton himself.

[Terenin]

National Security Advisor (John) Bolton is hostile to any arms control treaty that he will find any excuse and give any arguments, no matter how unrelated they are, to avoid the extension of strategic offensive arms

So the more he (Bolton) pumps, the more preferences he has. If there is no threat to US national security, there is no adviser . So he will find them, do not hesitate

[Vend]

They will not find a reason, they’ll come up with it)

[Aerodrome]

United States Seeking Reasons to Quit START-3

strange, usually a reason is not needed, invented, blamed, left.

[Andrey Chistyakov]

"Fairy Tale" has come true.

[To be or not to be]

The United States is looking for reasons to withdraw from START III "
PRC. Great Britain. France. India. Pakistan and ISRAEL are not in the contract and nothing .. And they are not soared ..

[Sky strike fighter]

So what are we soaring about if no one but us is steaming about these agreements?

[Andrey Chistyakov]

Quote: To be or not to be

The United States is looking for reasons to withdraw from START III "
PRC. Great Britain. France. India. Pakistan and ISRAEL are not in the contract and nothing .. And they are not soared ..

They are soared and will not have to ... There is a song in the film "Amphibian Man". Such words are there ..
And we would - we would all be at the bottom "...

[Romario_Argo]

we also have a home-made PC-26 line with a range of 2000 - 6000 km. just to contain: France, England, Israel, Pakistan
and with regards to START-3, our plants without tension release over 30 ICBMs per year, and this is the load in the 90-120 warheads,
and with the release of the Sarmatian ICBM series, at least 10 per year - 100 TAD BB or 30-40 Vanguards

[kjhg]

Quote: Romario_Argo

Our plants without tension release over 30 ICBMs per year

Let's estimate. Of these 30 ICBMs, how many go to replace the already used old Topol and Topol-M missiles, which form the basis of our PRGS? Another 16 missiles are needed to equip EACH of the 8 Boreas, which should be adopted by 2023. A total of 128 Mace missiles. This is not counting the test, verification and training runs.

Quote: Romario_Argo

and with the release of the Sarmatian ICBM series, at least 10 a year

According to plans, the Sarmat missile will be launched at 2-4 missiles per year.

Quote: Romario_Argo

100 THAT BB or 30-40 Vanguards

Utopian figures. The avant-garde is generally planned to be released 2 times a year. quote: "more is not needed yet." But, I suspect that the whole point is in the complexity and, accordingly, the cost of the Vanguards and Sarmat.
Not everything is as simple as it seems.

[rotmistr60]

United States Seeking Reasons to Quit START-3

There would be a desire, but a reason will always be found, proven by practice. In addition, there is a desire, so there will be a reason (the same Russian "hypersound").

[nPuBaTuP]

in Beijing have already stated that they do not intend to join any treaties

It would be worth adding that with. it’s impossible to agree ... Anyway, they’ll be deceived
They have such a mentality

[Dmitry Potapov]

So it is necessary to resume the development of the Barguzin BZHRK. Who cares that if we are sweethearts then Americans will become cute?

[Swed]

“According to Washington, the Avangard missile system, which will enter service with the Russian Strategic Missile Forces by the end of this year, violates the provisions of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.” So you yourself just recently shouted that this is all bluff and inventions?

[passerby]

I’m wondering another thing: what clause of the agreement does the development of the Avangard by Russia contradict

[neri73-r]

Quote: passerby

I’m wondering another thing: what clause of the agreement does the development of the Avangard by Russia contradict

They themselves do not know this point, everything contradicts! Zheltman must take a word!

[Born]

Recently I read Walter Miller's Anthem to Leibowitz. Dolbonauts hike on both sides of the ocean and lead the world to that.

[rocket757]

More and more fun events can catch us.

[g1washntwn]

According to Vanguard - not claims, but "highlighted like". And not to withdraw from START-3, and not to renew it on the same terms, it will end soon as it is. Just by analogy with the INF Treaty, the states again need to find someone to blame not in their mirror. In addition, they are very uncomfortable with questions about compliance with this agreement. In terms of quantity and cheating with carriers, UAVs, etc. They never took into account the issue of considering missile defense as a strategic element. The nuclear test ban treaty was not ratified (read - they wanted to chhat). Non-nuclear NATO members are taught to use their own nuclear weapons ... This is only what is on the surface from what our Foreign Ministry announced.

[verb]

Lord, finally make the Stalin Strait! Let THEY take care of their own country and do not climb everywhere!

[vmo]

Those who have brains can think, but the United States is not on this list.

[Zaurbek]

The time for the contracts is over.

[K-50]

Russia's development of hypersonic missiles could prevent the extension of the START-3 treaty, according to the White House.

That is, Russia cannot be developed, but pin dosniks are possible and there are no violations of START-3 at the same time.
Only one thing comes to mind. Ping dos niki try to prohibit everything in which they do not "shine", are inferior to others, but where they are "ahead of the rest of the planet", it does not violate anything. Apparently because they do not consider it a violation.

[sleeve]

START-3 in the furnace. Without the INF Treaty there is no special restrictive peacekeeping in it. on the contrary, taking into account the breakdown of all previous treaties, we need to have freedom in forming a strategic nuclear forces group, primarily a missile component. We do not shine to spin it to unrealistic quantitative values. Well, if they come out and chase their atomic program, welcome to the world of super-costs. Mozh will tear faster. But it seems to me that for the world around the world, nothing special will miss. While we are.

[Lord of the Sith]

They just need to look for a reason. Arms race again?

[501 Legion]

the fact that these rats will blame Russia for everything, and so it is clear, it was necessary to be ahead of the curve and blame pendos for the first

[Rwmos]

Given the traditional failures of the US military-industrial complex, it will come back to him. It is difficult to win an arms race with mass-scale mock-ups against real hypersonic missiles and with unarmed LCS against analogs from the Russian Federation that are gouging from the Caspian in Syria with Gauges. However. what can I talk about - the comparison of the US and Russian armies was in Syria. Not in favor of the US specifically so

[Kolbi]

Let them go out, but no matter how again then they do not come running to us for negotiations, begging to stop all this Russia harnesses for a long time, and then on hypersound and other things .. ha ha ha

[Old26]

Quote: Romario_Argo

and with regards to START-3, our plants without tension release over 30 ICBMs per year, and this is the load in the 90-120 warheads,

Over the past 5 years, more than 21 were not. Under 50 pieces - this is together ICBMs and SLBMs. And the plant alone is only releasing ICBMs so far ...

Quote: Romario_Argo

and with the release of the Sarmatian ICBM series, at least 10 per year - 100 TAD BB or 30-40 Vanguards

Let the flight tests of this ICBM even begin. And then we’ll talk about how much we will release per year ...

Quote: kjhg

Let's estimate. Of these 30 ICBMs, how many go to replace the already used old Topol and Topol-M missiles, which form the basis of our PRGS? Another 16 missiles are needed to equip EACH of the 8 Boreas, which should be adopted by 2023. A total of 128 Mace missiles. This is not counting the test, verification and training runs.

Everyone goes to replace, at least ICBMs. Now in a year there are no more than 1-2 launches of the same Yars. In addition, one must remember about the second or third ammunition load.
Topol-M are not being replaced yet ...

Quote: Dmitry Potapov

So it is necessary to resume the development of the Barguzin BZHRK. Who cares that if we are sweethearts then Americans will become cute?

What for? Money nowhere to go? It would be better in the existing PGRK divisions since START-3 will not increase the number of regiments ...

Quote: passerby

I’m wondering another thing: what clause of the agreement does the development of the Avangard by Russia contradict

Secret. It is written in invisible ink, so no one has seen these articles.