Military Review

A year later, Ford can move, now the problem is in the elevators

55
After more than 12 months of repair work, the U.S. Navy re-accepted the power plant designed for the latest American aircraft carrier fleet "Gerald R. Ford." Now she again has to undergo testing as part of an operational deployment. This was stated in the military department of the country.




100 The 000-ton warship is the largest and most expensive Navy ever made; its value amounted to 13 billion dollars, at least by 20% exceeding the originally projected expenses. Energy is generated by two nuclear reactors powered by A1B uranium fuel. According to estimates by the World Nuclear Association, 25 reactors are% more powerful than those used on aircraft carriers of the Nimitz type.

It is noted that it took 400 000 man-hours to correct the defect of the ship's propulsion system, which was allegedly committed at the manufacturing stage, and not caused by inadequate operation. The problem was that the steam generated during the operation of the reactors did not rotate the screws.

However, engines are not everything that keeps Ford at a mooring. Only two of the 11 elevators operate, designed to deliver ammunition to the flight deck, which should equip aircraft-carrier-based aircraft. According to the publication Sputnik, apparently, before the transfer of the ship of the Navy, scheduled for October, this flaw will not be eliminated.
55 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Rwmos
    Rwmos 14 August 2019 03: 13
    0
    So this is not for you Kuzya, who, although he smokes, walks along the oceans. This is for you universal people and an elven miracle of technology!
    What are elevators? Ugh! It is much more fun that the aircraft carrier is designed for the F-35 and it is the F-35 that is not capable of launching. And catapults over steam have the main advantage in adjusting the force, which allows you to launch drones. But this is on paper, but in real life - it cannot launch drones ... Well, and there, by the little things, such as the fact that the air finishers have a resource less than declared by 20.
    But I’m overwhelmed! This is not tfuvata for you, in which everyone steals and knows nothing! These are elves who can! To steal and build crookedly
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. KCA
        KCA 14 August 2019 03: 59
        +1
        So they and F-22 with F-35 riveted, but if for all planes there are weather conditions under which flights are impossible, then for these there are weather conditions under which flights are possible
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 14 August 2019 04: 06
          -1
          All these shortcomings will be eliminated, I am sure. Nevertheless, they are building aircraft. F-35s more than 300 pieces have already been built. We would have such a pace.
          1. carstorm 11
            carstorm 11 14 August 2019 04: 25
            +2
            and why do we need such a pace? they on their mainland can at least dance to us hopak then what sadness?
          2. Rwmos
            Rwmos 14 August 2019 04: 58
            +2
            300 units were built, which were not accepted due to defects in the armament of "limited combat-ready" pepelats. Saw cut in the spirit of an incapacitated aircraft carrier, like - to like
          3. Stone
            Stone 14 August 2019 08: 56
            +3
            Over 420.F-35 Lightning II Program Status and Fast Facts. f35.com, August 6, 2019
          4. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 14 August 2019 13: 01
            0
            Quote: Greenwood
            We would have such a pace.

            Yes, we would have theirs problems in shipbuilding. And there would be no problems with the fleet.
        2. Obi-Wan Kenobi
          Obi-Wan Kenobi 14 August 2019 06: 40
          +2
          So they and F-22 with F-35 riveted, but if for all planes there are weather conditions under which flights are impossible, then for these there are weather conditions under which flights are possible

          Why are you doing this? Just so, what would you leave your mark?
          Are you apparently a great aircraft designer? Maybe you are Tupolev, Ilyushin, Antonov or Sukhoi? No? Then why do you write such nonsense? After all, you understand airplanes and their operation in the same way as a ballerina in speleology.
          1. KCA
            KCA 14 August 2019 07: 30
            +2
            Read about the stealth coating and rain, about the stealth coating during take-off during a strong wind, when the dust rises, these are not my or anyone else's nonsense, these are Pentagon data, but imagine a F-22 or F-35 flight over The Barents or Kara Sea is generally from a science fiction film.
    2. Greenwood
      Greenwood 14 August 2019 04: 11
      +12
      Quote: RWMos
      this is not for you Kuzya, who, although he smokes, but walks across the oceans
      Kuzya went accompanied by a tugboat. And yes, now Kuzya will not go anywhere for a long time, because his repair is being delayed for well-known reasons.
      Quote: RWMos
      These are elves who can! To steal and build crookedly
      11 aircraft carriers in service. 2 aircraft carriers are being built at the same time. Meanwhile, in Russia they do not know what to do with the sunken floating dock, where the "Admiral Kuznetsov" was being repaired. In the meantime, Russia still cannot indicate the exact dates for the beginning of the design and construction of a new aircraft carrier for the Russian Navy. As the saying goes, "feel the difference."
      I have never been a fan of the United States, its policies, etc., but such an outrageous "hurray-patriotism" and senseless slinging mud at a "potential enemy" does not cause anything but bewilderment and irritation.
      1. Mordvin 3
        Mordvin 3 14 August 2019 04: 26
        +3
        Quote: Greenwood
        In the meantime, Russia still cannot indicate the exact dates for the start of the design and construction of a new aircraft carrier for the Russian Navy.

        And why is it needed if, in fact, we do not have a civilian fleet? Even the ships of state-owned companies go under foreign rags.
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 14 August 2019 08: 16
          +1
          Well, that's another question. I responded to the commentary on the water that the Americans do not know how. lol I think it makes no sense to start a discussion about the need for an aircraft carrier for the Russian Navy.
      2. KCA
        KCA 14 August 2019 04: 33
        +3
        I would like to find out the number of combat-capable stealth, and not their total number, I think you can immediately divide by 3 the number, then even in half, eliminating conditionally combat-ready. Russia needs ships for defense, and an aircraft carrier is a purely offensive ship, and even with reservations, dozens, if not hundreds of reviews of major military conflicts show the failure of aircraft carriers to launch missile and bomb attacks on the enemy, the difference in air sorties compared to ground airfields, in hundreds / thousand times less
      3. Nevsky_ZU
        Nevsky_ZU 14 August 2019 04: 37
        +4
        Quote: Greenwood
        In the meantime, Russia still cannot indicate the exact dates for the beginning of the design and construction of a new aircraft carrier for the Russian Navy. As the saying goes "feel the difference"

        And why does the continental power Russia need aircraft carriers if we do not have normal warm seas, where such huge vessels could be based for a long time without fatigue for metal from temperature extremes and other risks? Only the Black Sea with its Bosphorus Strait and the Montreux convention. And why should we go on colonial expeditions to maintain the ruble exchange rate around the world? For this you need to have the culture and mentality of the Anglo-Saxon. To begin with, go to knock on your neighbor with the help of civil denunciation, then take his wife as your wife, and rent out an apartment to your own children. Look, in 20 years, we will begin external expansion into the world. Well, if for the 40th year we have been watching "The Irony of Fate" on New Year's Eve with an Olivier salad, we walk for almost 2 weeks, and when we see a foreigner, we creep in feelings: from a liberal with a kiss to a patriot-padded jacket, who is blurred in feelings of hospitality, then then forget about aircraft carriers in Russia.
        1. Mordvin 3
          Mordvin 3 14 August 2019 04: 48
          +1
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          And what do we, in colonial expeditions, go to maintain the ruble exchange rate around the world?

          Hehe, what about Syria?
          1. Rwmos
            Rwmos 14 August 2019 04: 52
            +2
            What for there is an aircraft carrier, with a land base? Yes, and this does not seem to support the ruble, more like a reduction in the terrorist population, kindly prepared by the States for work in the Caucasus.
            1. Mordvin 3
              Mordvin 3 14 August 2019 04: 54
              +4
              Quote: RWMos
              What for there is an aircraft carrier, with a land base?

              And what for Kuzya smoked the sky there? Yes, and he sowed two planes.
              1. Nevsky_ZU
                Nevsky_ZU 14 August 2019 05: 42
                -1
                And what for Kuzya smoked the sky there?

                To maintain prestige and gain combat experience, which was not even during the Soviet Navy. And experience as an aircraft carrier, and not an aircraft carrier cruiser.
                Yes, and he sowed two planes.

                Because an aircraft carrier, the cruiser performed tasks unusual for it, like an aircraft carrier. Namely, - inflicted ground strikes in depth on land. And this is against the irregular forces of the ground enemy. Instead of taking off in a light with air-to-air missiles against other fighters that attack the naval grouping, as was conceived by the USSR navy. What's incomprehensible?
                1. Mordvin 3
                  Mordvin 3 14 August 2019 05: 57
                  +1
                  Quote: Nevsky_ZU
                  To maintain prestige and gain combat experience, which was not even during the Soviet Navy.

                  Do not drive.
                  American aircraft carriers shied away from ours.
                  And now we are near San Diego, in order to prevent Vinsionar from “raising another bandustan in the peaceful expanses of the Pacific Ocean”.

                  “To all the ships in the area, they call the USS at the exit from San Diego!” - Strengthened our confidence in the future airborne station "Raid". The American fishing trawlers lying nearby were ignored by the warriors.

                  “A ship in my course five miles, answer me!” The aircraft carrier Carl Vinson is calling!

                  This is us. I looked in the direction of the assistant:

                  - Answer?

                  - Come on!

                  “Yu-es-es“ Carl Vinson, ”answers the ship according to your course. Switch to the 11 channel for further communication, - put the receiver into the socket and repeatedly pressed the button until the number "11" was highlighted.

                  - Thank you sir! Please let me know if you see a Soviet ship in your area? - emerged on the new channel "Carluccio".

                  - No, skipper. Only American flag fishing vessels. You can safely follow the course taken.

                  “Thanks for the help, sir!” - the aircraft carrier was delighted, - Notify the type of your ship.

                  - Auxiliary of the Navy. The end of the connection - quickly finished unnecessary inquiries, sent the phone to its place.

                  “Vinson” significantly increased its speed and, after 15 minutes, it was already half a mile on our port side. A stunned watch officer stood on his bridge, no longer expecting anything good from such a pleasant day.

                  I looked at the starpom again.

                  - Come on! - he smiled.

                  “Carl Vinson, have you found the Soviet ship?” - I asked in a very serious voice.

                  - Soviet ship, says the commander of the aircraft carrier. Stop any attempts to get in touch with us! - Admiral's voice sounded like the voice of a vampire, stumbled upon a bunch of garlic.

                  Later, Vinsonyar landed aircraft from North Island, Le Moore and Alameda and fled towards Japan, but we already knew how and where he would go and even when he returned home in many months.

                  I love aircraft carriers! Gently…

                  https://e-libra.ru/read/525322-charli-charli-bravo.html
          2. Nevsky_ZU
            Nevsky_ZU 14 August 2019 05: 37
            -4
            Quote: mordvin xnumx
            Quote: Nevsky_ZU
            And what do we, in colonial expeditions, go to maintain the ruble exchange rate around the world?

            Hehe, what about Syria?

            There was an 1 demonstration call to Syria. Purely for public relations purposes, as well as gaining combat experience, which was not even in the Soviet Navy. And it was an aircraft carrier cruiser, the essence of which is to defend the ship from other enemy aircraft and, if possible, from other enemy ships. When it was designed, it was not planned that it would strike ground-based guerrilla-terrorist units inland.
        2. Greenwood
          Greenwood 14 August 2019 08: 18
          0
          Quote: Nevsky_ZU
          Well, if for the 40th year we have been watching "The Irony of Fate" on New Year's Eve with an Olivier salad, we walk for almost 2 weeks, and when we see a foreigner, we creep in feelings: from a liberal with a kiss to a patriot-padded jacket, who is blurred in feelings of hospitality, then then forget about aircraft carriers in Russia.
          Something has incurred you. Until 1991, the Navy command had no doubt about the need for ships of this class. At the same time, they ate olivier, and looked at the Irony of Fate.
          1. Nevsky_ZU
            Nevsky_ZU 14 August 2019 08: 20
            -2
            Quote: Greenwood
            Quote: Nevsky_ZU
            Well, if for the 40th year we have been watching "The Irony of Fate" on New Year's Eve with an Olivier salad, we walk for almost 2 weeks, and when we see a foreigner, we creep in feelings: from a liberal with a kiss to a patriot-padded jacket, who is blurred in feelings of hospitality, then then forget about aircraft carriers in Russia.
            Something has incurred you. Until 1991, the Navy command had no doubt about the need for ships of this class. At the same time, they ate olivier, and looked at the Irony of Fate.

            Amendment: cruiser aircraft carriers and another concept of the ocean fleet. She was defensive. Which flowed from our ideology, economy, mentality and lifestyle, attitude to material values. Today, the Russian Federation is formally a capitalist country, but without expansion and an invasive nature into the outside world. He is humble: selling gas and oil.
            By the way, you passed your parents to an elderly home !? And which of us suffered ?! To be in America, you must become America.
            1. Greenwood
              Greenwood 15 August 2019 05: 49
              -1
              Quote: Nevsky_ZU
              aircraft carriers cruisers
              This is a purely Soviet term; it is not in other fleets. And he was invented for a reason.
              Quote: Nevsky_ZU
              She was defensive
              If necessary, it would be offensive.
              Quote: Nevsky_ZU
              Today, the Russian Federation is formally a capitalist country, but without expansion and an invasive nature into the outside world. He is humble: selling gas and oil.
              I am aware of this. If we are to develop the idea, then the current RF does not need anything at all, it has only friends and partners around it. It is better to arm the Rosguard.
              Initially, I did not intend to engage in controversy over the need to build aircraft carriers for the Russian Navy, because this is a thankless task. And I wrote about this above.
              Quote: Nevsky_ZU
              By the way, you passed your parents to an elderly home !?
              But what did you write this phrase for? How is it related to the topic of aircraft carriers?
              And by the way, there is nothing wrong with nursing homes (as they exist in the West). In the modern century, in the era of globalization, with our total employment and the need to fly across the country, and even abroad to work, study, it will be better if parents have normal, full-fledged care from qualified personnel, they will communicate with each other friend, other seniors, have fun while not distracting children from work. Do not agree? Then explain: If you go to another city / to the other end of the country / abroad to work / study, how will you care for your parents?
              Quote: Nevsky_ZU
              like in america
              In America, in different ways. She is not in vain a hodgepodge of peoples from all over the world. What side of America are you interested in?
      4. lucul
        lucul 14 August 2019 08: 52
        -3
        I have never been a fan of the United States, its policies, etc., but such an outrageous "hurray-patriotism" and senseless slinging mud at a "potential enemy" does not cause anything but bewilderment and irritation.

        I have never heard a single good word about Russia from you. But bring the western world to heaven .....
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 15 August 2019 05: 57
          -2
          Quote: lucul
          I have never heard a single good word about Russia from you
          Poke my nose where I at least once called Russia a bad word, since you monitor my messages.
          And yes, not to love the authorities, not to love the internal politics of the authorities and not to love the country are "slightly" different things. Unfortunately, local idios ... uh ... jingoistic patriots are unable to understand such subtleties.
          Quote: lucul
          bring the western world to heaven
          You just have to be objective. The standard of living in Western countries is an order of magnitude higher. Dot. I personally know a lot of people who have gone to different western countries for permanent residence, I know even more who are dreaming or are going to leave for various reasons. I can fully understand them. But Americans or Japanese, for example, who have moved here permanently, I don’t know a single one.
          If for you this is "exaltation of the West to the skies", then no comment ... By the way, I was not in the West, but for example I skated around Japan, there is something to compare with.
      5. Nastia makarova
        Nastia makarova 14 August 2019 12: 05
        +2
        when we print money for the whole world then come up about aircraft carriers !!! Russia and the USSR do not pull them
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 15 August 2019 05: 58
          -2
          Quote: Nastia Makarova
          Russia and the USSR do not pull them

          lol And as soon as they pulled in the 80s? request
          1. Nastia makarova
            Nastia makarova 15 August 2019 07: 16
            +1
            there were no aircraft carriers, only on papers
            such as Admiral Kuznetsov, this is an aircraft carrier cruiser, he is far from an aircraft carrier
    3. Blackmokona
      Blackmokona 14 August 2019 05: 12
      +2
      Well, you compared the ship in trials and the old ship that passed tests long ago
    4. svp67
      svp67 14 August 2019 06: 13
      +5
      Quote: RWMos
      So this is not for you Kuzya, who, although he smokes, walks along the oceans.

      Well, this is really not "Kuzya", but 2,5 times larger ship, in terms of displacement and 5 times more complex in design, some catapults are worth it. So, you shouldn't throw your hats like that. Moreover, remembering our "motor" epic with "Gren"
      Quote: RWMos
      What are elevators? Ugh!

      I agree, there is a problem and they’ll just fix it now
      Quote: RWMos
      Well, and there, by the little things, such as the fact that the aerofinisher has a resource less than declared by 20.
      I'm sorry that I did not hear the news that the Americans, on a much larger number of landings on board the ship, had cases of breakage of landing cables-aerofisher.
      The ship is powerful among the Americans, it is the first in the series, now all childhood diseases will be revealed and they will no longer be on new ships
      1. Rwmos
        Rwmos 14 August 2019 06: 32
        -6
        You don’t work as a prophet on weekends ... laughing It’s about how they simply eliminated the jambs of F-22 and F-35, Zumvolta and LCS - it just didn’t work, they don’t know how to just do anything except commercials in the USA. SIMPLY - do not know how
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 14 August 2019 06: 59
          +3
          Quote: RWMos
          they don’t know how to do anything in the USA except commercials. SIMPLY - do not know how
          Yes, we’ll throw them with hats, hats.
          Tolley we, we can do everything, we can do everything, professionals.
        2. svp67
          svp67 14 August 2019 07: 24
          +2
          Quote: RWMos
          About how simply eliminated the jambs F-22 and F-35, Zumvolta and LCS - just nichrome did not work

          You have a "childish" view of this. Do you think that everything is so "curly" with our equipment and weapons and that there have never been any problems? Yes, in the same way, as soon as a NEW model of weapons was made, multiple problems were revealed on it, some of which could not be eliminated. The fact that now our military equipment goes through a cycle of tests for so long is precisely due to the fact that they have already learned by bitter experience. The Americans have a different approach, but they can afford it, and we cannot. They know for sure that even the "illiquid" is being "swiped" by somebody, the same Ukraine. But we do not, we have no such opportunity
          1. Rwmos
            Rwmos 14 August 2019 15: 20
            -1
            What have they "eliminated" in the US? You will teach me with your adult look. Themselves on the coffee grounds have learned to see the future - so the fact that since 1991 at least the US military-industrial complex has been engaged exclusively in sawing - not a single project took off, except for the Virginia nuclear submarines, which have been tormented since 1980 ... Well, the facts you can not pay attention - you have to stand in a pose and say - "Shcha will eliminate everything! Delov something! The gypsy guessed me!"
            And who does not agree, that look is childish. I will not justify either. Cards tell the truth
    5. Old Michael
      Old Michael 14 August 2019 08: 44
      -2
      To steal and build crookedly

      It’s not just to steal, but shamelessly rob the buyer, give him an unworkable product and then test and finish, in fact, at his expense.
      This technique worked out by Bill Gates on MS DOS, which became minimally stable only to version 3.30, having already been sold in millions of copies. The same thing happened with Windows - they sold for more than 10 years, the first minimally stable Windows turned out only in the early 2000s, it was pretty much modified Windows 98, while before it four previous paralyzed versions crammed buyers with both cheeks.
      And even today, already in 2019, who voluntarily transplants from the 7th Windows, which was also treated for almost two five-year plans, to the "eight" or "ten"?
      1. Nycomed
        Nycomed 14 August 2019 09: 56
        +1
        And you do not have Windows installed on your computer for an hour? Or, as a great programmer, did you install something of your own, import-substituting?
        1. Old Michael
          Old Michael 14 August 2019 10: 19
          +1
          At home a whole zoo, but not import-substituting - he fought and abandoned Altlinux, the imported assemblies a la ubunt are friendlier. And to the wife without Windows in any way - from bookkeeping on * niksa only 1Snye servers at least got accustomed, the client software whom you want to drive into a stupor.
          As for "your" - you turned it down abruptly, even Torvalds did not write the OS alone.
          And at the current work of Windows, there is an urgent need, although it used to be involved in creating system software for a completely different OS.
          The example with MS DOS was not taken from the ceiling, there bugs such as core unresponsiveness lived up to vin98. At the same time, PC DOS was created, and there was a completely different approach to users.
      2. Greenwood
        Greenwood 14 August 2019 10: 59
        0
        Quote: OldMichael
        in the early 2000s, it was pretty much modified Windows 98, while before it four previous paralyzed versions crammed buyers on both cheeks.
        Each Windows at the very beginning of its life cycle needed improvements. Nevertheless, no one could offer anything better to the layman.
        Quote: OldMichael
        And today, already in 2019, who voluntarily transplanted from the 7th Windows
        I moved in 2015, just as Windows 10 came out. In the same way, in 2009 I moved to Windows 7. 7ka is a good system, but its support will soon end. Drivers for new hardware are not written to it. 10ka it works quite steadily and is updated. I see no reason not to switch to it.
        Quote: OldMichael
        which was also treated for almost two five-year periods
        I do not know. Build 7600.16385, released in the summer of 2009, worked for me for 3 years without any problems.
        1. Old Michael
          Old Michael 14 August 2019 11: 04
          -1
          Yes, as a purely user-friendly Windows platform, it is quite acceptable. But for software developers - an endless stream of new bunts with each update plus a Procrustean bed of unobvious restrictions.
          For example, vin8 and vin 8.2 turned out to be very different OS.
          But the point was that it became normal to sell a semi-finished product, and then bring it to mind at the expense of buyers.
    6. Cyrus
      Cyrus 14 August 2019 11: 06
      +2
      I’m embarrassed to ask myself, at least understand what you wrote? How is it specifically for f35, and f18, etc. can’t take off from it? Maybe you got it wrong, although this is not surprising?)
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 14 August 2019 12: 11
        -1
        Both F-35 and F-18 took off from it. Electro-catapults gave 4 failures for more than 700 take-offs.
        And two dozen fixed delays during takeoffs. This is a lot, and catapults (their software and
        power supply) finish.
  2. Rwmos
    Rwmos 14 August 2019 04: 45
    -5
    Quote: Greenwood
    11 aircraft carriers in the ranks

    ... half of them are under repair, at any given moment no more than 4 is ready to go to sea
    Quote: Greenwood
    2 aircraft carriers are being built simultaneously
    ... and bullshit, which in principle is not combat ready, to build an unarmed trough - in the tradition of the mattress of the Navy - you can recall at least all three non-firing Zyama, at least unarmed troughs of the LCS ... And yes, I’ve got it! If. certainly not to recall that for the sake of this the United States practically stole its own land army, for which reason it was raked out with a full spoon in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria. And so - yes, too much
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 14 August 2019 07: 01
      -1
      Quote: RWMos
      ... half of them are under repair, at any given moment no more than 4 is ready to go to sea
      And so what? Any warship undergoes scheduled repairs after the next trip. I can’t imagine a situation where it would take all US aircraft carriers to go to sea at the same time.
      Quote: RWMos
      which in principle is not combat ready
      While they are only at the initial stage of construction, it is too early to talk about any combat readiness.
      1. Vasily Ponomarev
        Vasily Ponomarev 14 August 2019 07: 33
        0
        he does not understand the topic at all
      2. Rwmos
        Rwmos 14 August 2019 15: 36
        -1
        While they are only at the initial stage of construction, it is too early to talk about any combat readiness.

        Direct lies - in the 2017 year it was INTRODUCED into the fleet. And the propulsion system was accepted a SECOND TIME. The first time they accepted it, it turned out to be inoperative, and how did they receive it, with their eyes closed? In the initial stage of construction - the third aircraft carrier of the series, in the final - the second. and the first - already in the fleet for a long time, that's just completely unfit for work
        1. Greenwood
          Greenwood 15 August 2019 04: 08
          -2
          Quote: RWMos
          Direct lies - in 2017, INTEGRATED IN THE FLEET.
          Ale is sick, I didn’t talk about Ford. "Ford" is the lead ship of the series, naturally on it certain flaws will emerge, which will gradually be finished.
          Quote: RWMos
          In the initial stage of construction - the third aircraft carrier of the series, in the final - the second.
          And two more will be laid and built at the same time. A total of 5 pieces by the end of the decade. Good pace. No other country in the world can afford such a scale. And I see no reason to be ironic. While you keep throwing hats, keep going.
          Quote: RWMos
          that's just completely unfit
          Right now his combat capability is required? There is nothing to replace it with?
          1. Rwmos
            Rwmos 15 August 2019 04: 18
            -1
            Yes, not about him, "they" - plural - it speaks of ONE aircraft carrier. And they are incapable, and in principle - all three laughing Here it is "they". Painful.
            And 2 more non-ready troughs will be built. With which I congratulate them. I wish them a dozen more non-shooting Zyam to build a complete collection, so that it was more fun. otherwise they hadn’t been called stupid for a long time, probably for a couple of hours ... There’s the news that they “didn’t succeed” with the new ships, they themselves admit.
            And combat readiness is not immediately required from him, right. Not then built. Who needs a warship? The goal was only to cut the budget ...
            How I am touched by these slaves of the State Department. In an effort to whitewash the owner from stupidity - they themselves smear it with shit
    2. Nycomed
      Nycomed 14 August 2019 09: 59
      +3
      And how many are ready to go to sea? With us "Kuzya" goes on a hike once, then it stands in the dock for several years, and now there is nothing to stand in.
  3. bmv04636
    bmv04636 14 August 2019 04: 52
    +1
    there are blacks on ladders will carry laughing
    1. andrewkor
      andrewkor 14 August 2019 06: 02
      0
      You can convey from hand to hand like buckets of water in a fire!
  4. andrewkor
    andrewkor 14 August 2019 06: 42
    +4
    Ford’s crew was lucky, no hikes, no flights, but the service is on, full of relaxation, which isn’t good for combat tone. I can advise the teddy bear to scrape so that it sparkles or sharpen anchors! ☺!
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. NF68
    NF68 14 August 2019 15: 11
    +1
    That’s why she’s also a new tricked-out technician at most.
  7. Karaul14
    Karaul14 14 August 2019 19: 26
    +1
    The first ship in the series, because there are so many problems, new technologies are applied on it. It is funny that many laugh with the Americans, but at the same time not a single country in the world produces such close ships.
  8. shadow
    shadow 14 August 2019 21: 56
    -1
    Fuflo 22 killed its pilots altogether. Discontinued. Bullshit 35 is a very bad copy of the Yak-141, some of the documentation of which they bought in 1994-95, their aircraft carriers are idle and only two of them float in total. But nobody is interested in it. "Kuzya" is an aircraft-carrying heavy cruiser with an air wing and other gadgets. And as there, some non-scientists wrote, should fulfill the role of an aircraft carrier. Question: what role should an aircraft-carrying heavy cruiser play? Aircraft carriers, this is the last century, and even more so, such unfinished ones. Nobody canceled the planned repairs of our aircraft-carrying cruiser. But some just don't know. You might think ships of other countries do not undergo scheduled repairs.
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 15 August 2019 04: 12
      0
      Quote: Shadows
      Carriers, this is the last century, and even more so such unfinished.
      Yeah, the USSR Navy was planning to have at least 2000 project 8 aircraft-carrying cruisers in operation by 1143. They were probably stupid, they did not consult you.