Recovering from the explosion, "Crystal" has mastered the production of dynamic protection

35
The Crystal company, part of which was destroyed during the incident in June, launched production of dynamic protection. This was announced in a press release by the state corporation Rostec.





At the Dzerzhinsky enterprise "Crystal", which suffered the explosion in the powder shop in early June (then injuries of varying severity were received by about 80 people) mastered the release of dynamic protection. The release of new products is part of the efforts of Rostec State Corporation to resume the normal operation of the enterprise.

In total, about one and a half billion rubles were allocated for restoration work at the plant. It is assumed that these funds will restore the plant’s capacity. In addition, the state corporation announced "systemic changes in the scientific and industrial complex of Dzerzhinsk."

According to the press service, Kristall introduced new security measures, including the installation of a localization of heat supply and a modern fire extinguishing system. Thanks to these works, it was possible to launch the process of production of dynamic protection for tanks.

State Research Institute "Crystal" is the leading company in the Russian Federation engaged in the development and production of explosives, as well as the introduction of technologies for their production. The company works both in the interests of the military-industrial complex and civilian industry.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    12 August 2019 13: 53
    Hinged protection, relatively easy to replace ....
    the question is, is it reliable, efficient?
    1. +4
      12 August 2019 14: 03
      Quote: rocket757
      Is it reliable, effective?

      Surely tested if MO orders. IMHO.
      1. +12
        12 August 2019 14: 08
        Who gave the title to the article?
        Linked the recent incident and the development of dynamic protection. Like, "so that it doesn't happen again, we mastered dynamic protection."
        The development of new products is good, but it has nothing to do with the past explosion.
        1. +3
          12 August 2019 14: 24
          Quote: Shurik70
          Who gave the title to the article?

          Well, what do I have to do with it? Ask a question to the author, not to me. hi
    2. 0
      12 August 2019 14: 24
      with the usual difference is only the packaging of the blocks themselves. this is a pretty pragmatic solution for the sides. You can hang quickly and at any time.
    3. +11
      12 August 2019 14: 25
      About reliable. In Syria, even reinforced skirts tore off with a bang in urban movements. Such satchels will tear out quickly.
      1. 0
        12 August 2019 18: 37
        It was the Syrian experience that they used. Such kits can be hung on any tank in minutes or replaced with a new one. When moving in the city and colliding with a building, it will simply be torn off, and "reinforced skirts" often damaged the chassis of the tank and the tank took a long time to be repaired. The United States followed a similar scheme, but their remote sensing system is installed much longer and more difficult
        1. +2
          12 August 2019 21: 43
          Quote: loki565
          Such kits can be hung on any tank in minutes or replaced with a new one.

          If you are talking about bales on the sides, then they are just an addition to the main DZ
          Quote: loki565
          The USA went according to a similar scheme, but their DZ is installed much longer and more difficult

          What is shown by the Americans is not just DZ, it is a multi-layer combined defense and, as I understand it, is quite serious. Ceramics-Boxes DZ-Steel sheet.
    4. -1
      12 August 2019 14: 27
      Quote: rocket757
      Hinged protection, relatively easy to replace ....
      the question is, is it reliable, efficient?

      But also not safe for its infantry.
      1. +2
        12 August 2019 18: 25
        Than? this is not an active defense, such as an arena. It would probably not be safe for infantry to explode an RPG or ATGM
        1. -1
          12 August 2019 21: 33
          Quote: loki565
          What?

          Explosion of explosives embedded in a container, plus flying pieces of metal

          Quote: loki565
          It would probably not be safe for infantry to explode an RPG or ATGM

          Yes, but in this case it is multiplied by two
          1. +2
            12 August 2019 21: 40
            The explosive in the remote sensing is minimal in comparison with an RPG or ATGM shot, it mainly shoots the plate.
            1. -2
              12 August 2019 21: 47
              Quote: loki565
              Explosives in the remote sensing are minimal compared to the RPG or ATGM firing,

              Did you hold it in your hands? This BB "plate" is not so small
              Quote: loki565
              it basically shoots off the plate.

              And where does she shoot it, in which direction? And you think that the box itself remains intact?
              1. +2
                12 August 2019 22: 00
                And where does she shoot it, in which direction?

                there is a shift relative to the direction of the comulative jet, thereby destroying it

                And you think that the box itself remains intact?

                Yeah, after the ATGM explosion, she remains intact laughing
                Here is an example of the good work of DZ
                1. -1
                  12 August 2019 22: 12
                  Quote: loki565
                  there is a shift relative to the direction of the comulative jet, thereby destroying it

                  Bias? Yes, it flies, plus the blast wave from these "plates" tears everything that it can in its path
                  Quote: loki565
                  Here is an example of the good work of DZ

                  This ATGM hit the tower, and even into the T-90 cheekbone, and there not only the DZ but also the multilayer armor is of very serious thickness.
                  In this regard, the multilayer spaced-apart defense of the T-62M turret is good, it also "extinguishes" ATGM and BPS, but it is not so dangerous for infantry
                  1. +1
                    12 August 2019 22: 25
                    This ATGM hit the tower, and even into the T-90 cheekbone, and there not only the DZ but also the multilayer armor is of very serious thickness.

                    So the article discusses DZ and not multi-layer armor.
                    And here is an example of getting into a tank on which there is no DZ

                    1. -1
                      13 August 2019 06: 18
                      Quote: loki565
                      So the article discusses DZ and not multi-layer armor.
                      And here is an example of getting into a tank on which there is no DZ

                      In the same way, hit the T-90 tower and there will be the same effect, by the way, the T-90s in Syria have already suffered losses. And on the "Abrams" for this, they put additional solid armor plates, in order to somehow protect the vulnerable zones
  2. +2
    12 August 2019 14: 09
    The essence of the article is not that we have established the production of DZ, but that our many enterprises of the military-industrial complex work on old stuff. The truth is "until the rooster crows, the man does not move," or until as a result of the emergency everything old is destroyed, the new is not installed ... So it turns out - the rulers demand the latest technologies, but they don’t give money for new equipment, earn money yourself and with your own money and buy new equipment ... Or maybe I'm wrong?
    1. +10
      12 August 2019 14: 33
      Quote: Vitaliy Tsymbal
      Or maybe I'm wrong?

      a few photos of different industries, the military sphere






  3. +7
    12 August 2019 14: 20
    Quote: Vitaly Tsymbal
    Or maybe I'm wrong?

    you have porridge in your head.
    not the government, but the capitalists do not want to renew the means of production.
    And not investing in an enterprise occurs for a number of reasons:
    1.No long available money available on the market (thanks to the government)
    2. Cheap labor and workers are not socially protected (thanks to the government)
    3. Often the qualifications of the people who manage the enterprise do not make it possible to plan equipment upgrades, and someone does not even understand the usefulness of this. There are concerns over the instability of laws, property rights and the economic situation (thanks to the government)
    4. Taxes are such that without a state order it is very difficult to get a stable profit (thanks to the government), and without profit what updates?

    but despite the fact that the government influences everywhere, there is no direct connection with his desires.
    1. +9
      12 August 2019 14: 43
      For yehat (Sergey) Porridge in your head for you can not correctly comprehend what I wrote. I did not give any arguments to assert my innocence - I expressed my opinion and put a question mark especially for people who think, rather than offend. In Russian, the question mark indicates not an affirmative, but an interrogative form that implies an answer to a question, not insults. C look at the answer to my friend question under nickname NasRat (Evlampy Spiridonovich), in spite of the original nickname, without saying a word he gave me a very extended and sensible answer ... unlike your verbiage in the form of political slogans "frozen in lumps in porridge" !!!
    2. +5
      12 August 2019 15: 04
      Well well. Social protection and social guarantees for workers in Rostec, Rosatom, MIT, Makeev are very high intra-industry. And Rostec just invested a lot of money in the modernization of production. Have you been at least one defense enterprise in the last 3-4 years?
  4. +1
    12 August 2019 14: 26
    a heat supply localization system and a modern fire fighting system were installed. Thanks to these works, it was possible to launch the production of dynamic protection for tanks.

    What you don’t know in old age. Fire extinguishing complex helps to speed up the production process !!!! what
    We recently kicked Latynina together,
    which detects the arrow on the oscilloscope (a sensational fragment of one of Ms. Latynina’s books), knows that Nikolai Copernicus was “burned at the stake”, and also on the pages of the same Novaya Gazeta, writes about the incident near Chelyabinsk in 2013, as about the "explosion of a rocket fired from a neighboring firing range."

    But at least she is a woman. And this "masterpiece" is again anonymous
    1. +3
      12 August 2019 15: 08
      Quote: Amateur
      Fire fighting system contributes accelerate the production process !!!!

      Well, why are you like this? After all, quoted differently
      Thanks to these works, it was possible to launch the production of dynamic protection for tanks.

      Where is there about the acceleration of production?
      You can’t distort it like that. The word was added and the whole meaning was distorted
      1. -1
        12 August 2019 17: 07
        Convinced! For start new
        start the dynamic production process
        production process required fire protection !!!
        What you don’t know in old age
        crying
        1. +1
          12 August 2019 18: 37
          Quote: Amateur
          required fire protection !!!

          And without it, no one will let you start the process
  5. -3
    12 August 2019 14: 32
    Will they be able to put a hinged defense together with tanks normally in a conflict zone and hang them normally? We even shot down the same SU 24 because they didn’t want to provide not proper protection and protection, who after this would need to worry about the hinged protection of the tanks? They will bring it and throw it wherever it may be to the warehouse, and so it will fail or, most likely, will not transport it at all.
    1. +3
      12 August 2019 14: 59
      Well, we don't seem to have tanks in the conflict zone. And so I'm not an expert, but it is unlikely that tanks "ride" with their daily protection hung. In the warehouse, they will probably
  6. +1
    12 August 2019 14: 34
    According to the press service, Kristall introduced new security measures, including the installation of a localization of heat supply and a modern fire fighting system. Thanks to these works, it was possible to launch the production of dynamic protection for tanks.

    what I scratch turnip ...
    it took an accident to make it all happen ... verily, until the thunder strikes, the man crosses himself.
    1. 0
      12 August 2019 15: 04
      That would be to find out what a heat localization system means. Hangar with gates and heating? what
      And how does all this relate to the explosion? what
  7. 0
    12 August 2019 15: 06
    Quote: K-612-O
    Have you been at least one defense enterprise in the last 3-4 years?

    I'm there now)))
  8. +1
    12 August 2019 16: 40
    They quickly recovered and yet these explosions are alarming ..
  9. -1
    12 August 2019 19: 55
    it is more like the products of an underground workshop where the Vietnamese work than the products of a serious state-owned enterprise
  10. +1
    12 August 2019 21: 48
    Quote: yehat
    Quote: K-612-O
    Have you been at least one defense enterprise in the last 3-4 years?

    I'm there now)))

    That is, being at the facility, write here? winked I’m curious what kind of defense enterprise this is, whose employees are free to surf the Internet while at work, and what is your bespeak busy with in this case? belay wassat
    1. 0
      14 August 2019 10: 06
      Quote: Radikal
      and what is your bespeka busy in this case?

      Like any bezpeka, they are busy looking for the possibility of additional income, it’s in their blood.