In the United States published a list of "most dangerous" military aircraft in Russia

The American edition of National Interest published the TOP-5 of the most powerful and dangerous aircraft created in Russia.




This list includes the Su-27 fighter, which became the Soviet response to the American F-15 and F-16. Multipurpose fighter has unique weapons, including several ground-to-air missiles. The MiG-29, which is currently in use and is in service with many countries from the republics of the former USSR and not only, is one of the most maneuverable aircraft. Its performance is superior to that of the F-16. In addition, the fighter is equipped with P-60 missiles for close-range combat and air-to-ground missiles.

The American TOP includes Su-35 and Su-57 fighters. Su-35 is famous for its high-speed performance and super-maneuverability, a large radius of application. This fighter has a high secrecy, since its design uses radar absorbing materials. The fifth generation Su-57 is a more advanced version of the Su-35, according to NI, and surpasses it in maneuverability, stealth and armament.

The Tu-160 strategic bomber was recently recognized as one of the most dangerous aircraft in Russia.

The publication notes that the Tu-160 is superior to American bombers in speed and range. The powerful Tu-160 can carry various types of warheads, including nuclear ones.

In fact, NI’s “research” looks like a banal enumeration of modern and less modern fighters and long-range missile carriers, which are in service with the Russian Air Force.
Photos used:
Depositphotos.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. NEXUS 12 August 2019 11: 44 New
    • 11
    • 3
    +8
    Captains evidence ...
    1. Ilya-spb 12 August 2019 11: 55 New
      • 8
      • 3
      +5
      Like in a cartoon. "They counted us!"
      1. NEXUS 12 August 2019 11: 56 New
        • 8
        • 1
        +7
        Quote: Ilya-spb
        Like in a cartoon. "They counted us!"

        Exactly 38 parrots, as there were more of them. fellow
        1. Ilya-spb 12 August 2019 12: 05 New
          • 8
          • 1
          +7
          Dear Nexus! Well, American journalists need to work out salaries!

          The absence of serious analyzes, comparisons, and quality articles is a problem not only for American journalism. Clips, Google and Wikipedia - this is the basis of the work of modern "sharks of the pen."

          This is unfortunate! (with)
    2. x.andvlad 12 August 2019 12: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      In fact, NI’s “research” looks like a banal enumeration of modern and less modern fighters and long-range missile carriers, which are in service with the Russian Air Force.
      It would be something to write about. They just work to increase circulation and rating. And this is revenue and popularity. Capitalism...
    3. cormorant 12 August 2019 13: 20 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Repetition is the mother of learning. Let them not relax there.
  2. Sonmaster 12 August 2019 11: 48 New
    • 12
    • 2
    +10
    "The multi-role fighter has unique weapons, including several ground-to-air missiles."
    On a fighter rocket, earth - air ... How's that?
    Maybe air is earth?
    Although .... when finalizing the file ...
    1. yehat 12 August 2019 11: 51 New
      • 15
      • 0
      +15
      agree, few fighters can boast ground-to-air missiles
      Isn't that unique? laughing and there you can find a stop crane ...
      1. Revival 12 August 2019 11: 58 New
        • 4
        • 2
        +2
        Moreover, perhaps no fighter, except for the Su-27, can boast of ground-to-air missiles!)))
        1. yehat 12 August 2019 12: 15 New
          • 3
          • 1
          +2
          but here everything is not so clear
          weren't these planes equipped with ground-to-air missiles?


          in my opinion, all three are armed with ground-to-air missiles, or are themselves such missiles
      2. Crimean partisan 1974 13 August 2019 12: 00 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        several ground-to-air missiles. ... so there are few, only a few, that is, not everyone
        , and the stop crane is single red
    2. Tuzik 12 August 2019 12: 00 New
      • 6
      • 2
      +4
      And if you let it stand? She will fly into the air?
    3. Marconi41 12 August 2019 12: 47 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Sonmaster
      "The multi-role fighter has unique weapons, including several ground-to-air missiles."
      On a fighter rocket, earth - air ... How's that?
      Maybe air is earth?
      Although .... when finalizing the file ...

      Shoots right from the takeoff!
    4. Lipchanin 12 August 2019 14: 44 New
      • 2
      • 1
      +1
      Quote: Sonmaster
      Although .... when finalizing the file ...

      Yes, even touch a plane. repeat
  3. Vasily Ponomarev 12 August 2019 11: 48 New
    • 4
    • 5
    -1
    Sorry for the offtopic, I recently found out that the new ge9x has a traction record (can you comment?
    1. Alexey Sommer 12 August 2019 21: 14 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      You can’t write about it here. This is a military secret!
  4. Nycomed 12 August 2019 11: 54 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    And why is this listing? We, with the same success, could list their aircraft. What is the trick? Or am I misunderstanding something?
    1. Vasily Ponomarev 12 August 2019 11: 57 New
      • 5
      • 1
      +4
      so the trick is not that they listed, the trick is that they threw it to the site, there are a lot of things on the Internet but this does not mean that you need to post everything
    2. Tuzik 12 August 2019 11: 58 New
      • 3
      • 1
      +2
      Ratings, top 5, fashionable
      1. Vasily Ponomarev 12 August 2019 12: 02 New
        • 3
        • 2
        +1
        you know, modern fashion is so broken
  5. gabonskijfront 12 August 2019 12: 01 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    American maximalism, plus rationalism and the desire to make a show out of everything, give this ridiculous desire to arrange everything according to the rating, and with epithets the most dangerous, super scary, hyper creepy.
  6. Old26 12 August 2019 12: 01 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Another stuffing from NI

    This list includes the Su-27 fighter, which became the Soviet response to the American F-15 and F-16 ..

    The answer to the F-16? What you can’t read on NI laughing

    Multipurpose fighter has unique weapons, including several ground-to-air missiles.

    Of course unique? Probably the only fighter that is equipped with anti-aircraft missiles. I wonder from which complex? From S-300 or S-400 ???

    The MiG-29, which is currently in use and is in service with many countries from the republics of the former USSR and not only, is one of the most maneuverable aircraft. Its performance is superior to that of the F-16.

    So MIG was created as an answer to the "16th". Moreover, the characteristics of a twin-engine aircraft will be higher than that of a single-engine

    Well and further in the same vein. And consider a fighter that is not in the series more powerful than ..... can only NI. And why is there a TU-160, but no TU-22M3 or SU-34 .... In short, the next TOP from a well-known magazine
  7. Ravil_Asnafovich 12 August 2019 12: 06 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    And you can scold, we have something where An 2 is.
    1. Nycomed 12 August 2019 12: 30 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Yes Yes. Even the old Be-12 “Seagull” won back like it seemed to be in flight condition. She has the same place in this "rating"! good
  8. Chaldon48 12 August 2019 12: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Well, here the ad is done, you can trade.
    1. Crimean partisan 1974 13 August 2019 12: 08 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      like "com oranges, comm wittttamines"
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. SASHA OLD 12 August 2019 13: 20 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    to be honest, some kind of game is written, even reluctant to disassemble point-by-point (as soon as I saw "earth-air" I thought "why not" planet-space "?"
    (and this despite the fact that there are a lot of ours in the top, which, like me, are the best or some of the best)
  11. Cocaine 12 August 2019 16: 51 New
    • 1
    • 2
    -1
    I would also add that not only our fighters, helicopters, etc. are dangerous. Most of all in the West they are afraid of the insolence of our pilots masterfully controlling these aircraft .. Yes, and in general the fighting spirit of a Russian soldier is a little afraid, and in Syria, for example, we have already proved how we can fight even on foreign territory .. And how will we be on our own then? soldier For 30 years we have not been able to erase the spirit of a military fraternity, honor and love for the Fatherland!
  12. Tusv 12 August 2019 18: 55 New
    • 3
    • 3
    0
    Mig-31yanki no longer afraid? In vain !. There and without a dagger, the most powerful weapon of all fighters
  13. BOB044 12 August 2019 20: 20 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    And the guys are afraid. This is not to fight with the Papuans.
    1. Nycomed 12 August 2019 23: 45 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      So cannibals have the same planes. In Ethiopia and Eritrea, the Su-27 and MiG-29. And Iraq and Libya, at one time, had practically the entire line of USSR aircraft, including the Su-24, MiG-25 and Tu-22. However, their Air Force was destroyed in a matter of days. True Iraqi planes were more fortunate. The brave pilots of Saddam's grandfather chose not to engage in battle with coalition planes, but massively deserted the territory of their "sworn friend" Iran. Iran, of course, did not return them to Iraq, believing that this is a gift from Allah in the form of reparations for the recently ended war. And now they are in service with Iran.
  14. Monar 13 August 2019 07: 57 New
    • 1
    • 1
    0
    In fact, NI’s “research” looks like a banal enumeration of modern and less modern fighters and long-range missile carriers, which are in service with the Russian Air Force.
    And we have no others. )))
  15. pafegosoff 13 August 2019 09: 37 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "NI" is sometimes hit.
    However, they write for Americans.
    And they can and must be hit ...
  16. The comment was deleted.