Military Review

The dates of the first fully autonomous UAV S-70 "Hunter" flight are announced

82
The information on the first full-fledged flight test of the Russian shock heavy drone "Okhotnik" was confirmed. He flew into the air on August 3, and the flight itself lasted more than 20 minutes.


The dates of the first fully autonomous UAV S-70 "Hunter" flight are announced


It is noted that UAV control was carried out from the ground. The maximum flight height of the C-70 Hunter was 600 m. He made several overflights of the airfield.

Now, according to the news agency TASSreferring to the Ministry of Defense and industry representatives, new flight tests are being prepared with the complication of flight missions. In particular, the material indicates that by the end of the year it is planned to carry out three flight tests, and one of them should be carried out in a completely autonomous mode - the drone will not be controlled by the operator. In this version, the drone will be fully controlled by the program in which the flight mission is embedded.

Previously (respectively, also until the end of the 2019 year), the “Hunter” will fly into the air in a partially autonomous mode, in which only a few basic commands will be received from the operator by the board.

Recall that the C-70 "Hunter" has a take-off mass of about 20 tons, made in the form of a "flying wing" with anti-radar (reducing the visibility of enemy radar) coating. "Hunter" is designed to defeat a wide range of targets, including fortified points and enemy armored vehicles.

Thus, Russia in a very short time became one of the countries of the world that have the technology to create their own heavy shock drones.
82 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Fedor Sokolov
    Fedor Sokolov 7 August 2019 06: 52
    +3
    It is desirable to speed up the process of adopting the Hunter; it is very much needed in Syria for the timely detection and suppression of the artillery crews of terrorists who regularly fire at our Khmeimim airbase. By the way. and what is heard behind the Orion UAV, it seems like it should have been put into service this year. Russia needs strike UAVs as much as air, as much as possible to risk the lives of flight personnel of the Aerospace Forces, where it is possible to effectively work out with drones.
    1. sir.jonn
      sir.jonn 7 August 2019 07: 19
      +4
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      it is desirable to speed up the process of adopting the "Okhotnik", it is very much needed in Syria

      "Hunter" is more likely a development of key elements for a sixth generation fighter, at least the fact that this drone will have supersonic and the ability to destroy air targets is very likely.
      1. KCA
        KCA 7 August 2019 07: 26
        0
        I am also afraid that this is just a flight prototype for testing technologies, the marking hints, S-70, Berkut was also S, S-47, then someone called it SU-37
        1. Errr
          Errr 7 August 2019 09: 31
          +3
          The Su-37 has never been a Berkut. He has always been the "Terminator" pictured below.
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 7 August 2019 10: 14
            +4
            Quote: Herrr
            Su-37 was never "Berkut"

            In-in ... otherwise I fell into a stupor - who was he and when he spread his wings back laughing


            1. Errr
              Errr 7 August 2019 10: 24
              0
              hi Yes, there, apparently, the KSA mosquito rushed a little. The fact is that before becoming a Su-47, it was called C-37rather than S-47.
        2. Nikolaevich I
          Nikolaevich I 7 August 2019 10: 07
          +2
          Quote: KCA
          S-70, "Berkut" was also S, S-47, then someone called it SU-37
          Well, you've got the "vinaigrette"! All "to the heap" was mixed! lol
      2. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 7 August 2019 10: 22
        +2
        Quote: sir.jonn
        the ability to destroy air targets is very likely.

        Destroy air targets? Maybe ... I think that first of all, the Aerospace Forces need a strike aircraft + reconnaissance! And as for air targets ... so back in the 60s, the Americans "experimented" air battles between a drone and an F-4 using RVV ...
        Quote: sir.jonn
        this drone will have supersonic

        But this is unlikely! Is it only if, after a "deep modernization", practically a new aircraft is created ...
        1. Alex777
          Alex777 7 August 2019 12: 39
          +1
          this drone will have supersonic

          The "flying wing" will never have supersonic sound. NEVER. bully
      3. alexmach
        alexmach 7 August 2019 11: 05
        +1
        Hunter "is more like working out key elements for a sixth generation fighter

        Yes, which one is a fighter. Tales of Grandfather Makar. Kakraz for anti-harmony operations this Hunter.
      4. Klingon
        Klingon 7 August 2019 12: 46
        0
        What supersonic are you? It is subsonic by definition. Technology may work out yes, but for the new PAK YES
      5. okko077
        okko077 7 August 2019 19: 20
        -5
        We haven't figured out the 5th generation, are you already the 6th? Will this "Hunter" with a weight of 20 tons be controlled within a radius of 150 or 200 km? How about 1 thousand km or 5 thousand km? No way? What the hell is he needed? Run around quietly with this unmanned aerial vehicle ... There are no achievements ... When will conventional UAVs work in real time for at least 500 km?
        1. Voyager
          Voyager 8 August 2019 10: 36
          +2
          This drone has roughly 3 possible modes. Operator control on the ground - time. Flight and work according to a predetermined program with AI elements - two. And the independent work of AI in pair and under the supervision of the Su-57, whose pilot gives key commands - three.
    2. K-612-O
      K-612-O 7 August 2019 09: 19
      0
      Haste is needed when catching fleas, you will remember how many years it took to Su-27, and this unit is much more complicated. The main thing is to get a finished tested sample, and raw, with subsequent endless improvements, like the F-35 or our Tu-22
      1. alexmach
        alexmach 7 August 2019 11: 10
        -1
        and this device is much more complicated

        But this is not a fact by the way. Glider - well vryatli super complex. Engines - they should use the used ones, it is logical to have unified with other aircraft, the same SU-57, radar - someone saw the nose of the Su-34. The only big innovation is flight autonomy and maintaining long-distance communications. The first, at the current level of technology, is very solvable, and in many places the problem has already been solved long ago. Communication - this is a serious issue that requires infrastructure.
        1. Pajamas
          Pajamas 7 August 2019 12: 02
          0
          Radar is unlikely, who will make the decision-operator? It is doubtful. They position it as an attack on ground targets and not as a fighter drone, if there is a need for a more logical combination with AWACS, Su-57 or any other external target designation.
          1. alexmach
            alexmach 7 August 2019 12: 28
            +1
            And for ground targets you don’t need a radar at all?
            1. Pajamas
              Pajamas 7 August 2019 12: 40
              0
              Maybe I don’t know something, but call me an ammunition that uses radar for a ground target. A thermal imager is not enough for you, laser guidance, as I understand you are talking about moving targets., An optical station?
              1. Alex777
                Alex777 7 August 2019 18: 08
                +1
                call me ammunition using ground-based radar

                Some RCCs do this. Onyx for example. Or Volcano.
                1. Pajamas
                  Pajamas 7 August 2019 18: 50
                  0
                  Quote: Alex777
                  Some RCCs do this. Onyx for example. Or Volcano.

                  Where does the carrier radar lead her? Target designation, calculation of the adaptive trajectory of BASU, GSN - bahbadabum, if you are talking about GSN, then we are talking about the need for a radar for a striker. .
                  1. Alex777
                    Alex777 8 August 2019 10: 56
                    0
                    Aiming RCC on radio contrast targets implies the use of an appropriate GOS. hi
        2. Alex777
          Alex777 7 August 2019 12: 44
          0
          and this device is much more complicated

          But this is not a fact by the way.

          Another fact. $ 200 million worth the drone shot down by the Iranians.
          More expensive and F-22, and many times more expensive than F-35. hi
          And this is with decades of mass production.
      2. armata_armata
        armata_armata 7 August 2019 12: 31
        0
        Hurry is needed when catching fleas, you will remember how many years it took to Su-27

        Then it must be transferred from NAZ, because the plant will not survive for a long time without an order ...
  2. Valery Valery
    Valery Valery 7 August 2019 07: 10
    -29
    The maximum flight height of the S-70 Okhotnik device was 600 m

    600 meters ?! This is about nothing!
    We need more than 15000 meters - with such a mass!
    1. sir.jonn
      sir.jonn 7 August 2019 07: 23
      +21
      Quote: Valery Valery
      The maximum flight height of the S-70 Okhotnik device was 600 m

      600 meters ?! This is about nothing!
      We need more than 15000 meters - with such a mass!

      If the task for a test flight required 600 meters, this means that you need to fly at an altitude of 600 meters and nothing else.
    2. Volodin
      Volodin 7 August 2019 07: 27
      +19
      Quote: Valery Valery
      600 meters ?! This is about nothing!
      We need more than 15000 meters - with such a mass!

      Do you, for the first time pushing weights, immediately take two on 32?
      1. Mestny
        Mestny 7 August 2019 12: 48
        +4
        Sofa experts take 320 each at once.
        And the fighters with the regime are generally a ton.
    3. NN52
      NN52 7 August 2019 08: 50
      +12
      600 meters, this is the standard flight altitude in a circle at your aerodrome.
    4. Piramidon
      Piramidon 7 August 2019 09: 09
      +5
      Quote: Valery Valery
      The maximum flight height of the S-70 Okhotnik device was 600 m

      600 meters ?! This is about nothing!
      We need more than 15000 meters - with such a mass!

      Tests of aircraft begin in general with runs and jumps, and you need to launch it into orbit right away on your first flight. fool
    5. Pajamas
      Pajamas 7 August 2019 12: 57
      +1
      Quote: Valery Valery
      600 meters ?! This is about nothing!
      We need more than 15000 meters - with such a mass

      how is mass related to height? cruise missiles fly low because light, ballistic high because heavy, logical.
  3. Deathmaker
    Deathmaker 7 August 2019 08: 09
    +1
    "This is such a shitty summer in Russia."
    Sorry, could not resist.
    AOT: it would be interesting to see the flight of the S-70 as a slave from 57m. It seems as stated about such a goal of the project.
    1. alexmach
      alexmach 7 August 2019 12: 31
      0
      It’s just not at all clear why to make a couple of airplanes with different speed characteristics.
      1. Pajamas
        Pajamas 7 August 2019 13: 07
        +2
        Quote: alexmach
        It’s just not at all clear why to make a couple of airplanes with different speed characteristics.

        There are two objections
        1. Why should they fly all the time in a place, meeting in the task area.
        2. On super sound, the Su-57 will burn all the kerosene even without afterburner several times faster, especially since the specific consumption will most likely be very close for both vehicles 0.6-0.7 kg / kg.s per engine, therefore, in standby mode the Su-57 will have the same 0.8-0.9 M, or even less.
        PS Today we have a direct discussion drinks
  4. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 7 August 2019 08: 13
    +1
    Like it or not, the future for UAVs. The main thing is to prevent UAVs without making a decision. One involuntarily recalls a fantastic story like Ray Bradbury the author, where steel birds with artificial intelligence were set to play the role of policemen.
    1. Vadim02rus
      Vadim02rus 7 August 2019 09: 08
      +5
      Ray Bradbury author

      Robert Shackley hi
      1. Dmitry Potapov
        Dmitry Potapov 7 August 2019 11: 08
        0
        Thirty years ago I read, I was mistaken.
        1. Vadim02rus
          Vadim02rus 7 August 2019 11: 58
          0
          Read thirty years ago

          Similarly. And until recently, he also thought it was Bradbury.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 7 August 2019 13: 03
        0
        Quote: Vadim02rus
        Ray Bradbury author

        Robert Shackley hi

        Is there a movie on this work?
        1. Vadim02rus
          Vadim02rus 8 August 2019 08: 38
          0
          Is there a movie on this work?

          I did not see. Yes, I'm not a movie fan. I love the book, but in the paper version, so that it smelled of printing ink feel
    2. dauria
      dauria 7 August 2019 10: 48
      0
      . The main thing is to prevent UAVs without making a decision.


      The missiles themselves have long been making decisions. They act in a flock, divide the targets in the order among themselves, re-target the source of interference, replace the downed "girlfriend." Since the 70s of the last century. .PCR "Granite".
      1. Dmitry Potapov
        Dmitry Potapov 7 August 2019 11: 07
        0
        The rockets do not return, and the decisions of "Granita" are made in accordance with the program laid down in it, this is a little different than artificial intelligence, perhaps for which in the near future non-standard solutions may be characteristic, something like human actions devoid of logic, but at the same time leading to logical the result.
        1. dauria
          dauria 7 August 2019 22: 20
          0
          according to the program laid down in it, it is slightly different than artificial intelligence


          Human intelligence is the same program selected by evolution. From reflexes and instincts to the mind There are just so many external (and internal) parameters, and the number of rings of these programs embedded in each other is so great that it seems to you that there is something fundamentally different from you in the car. The same machine, only biological. And the selection of programs is tough - natural selection.
    3. okko077
      okko077 8 August 2019 00: 01
      0
      Look at the film "The All-Seeing Eye" and you will receive an answer to all your questions, do not pay attention to some fairy tales ...
  5. Jeremiah
    Jeremiah 7 August 2019 08: 33
    -2
    Of course, an interesting bird in itself is so similar to PAK DA demonstration sketches. May be at the same time some sort of elaboration of the glider
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 7 August 2019 09: 28
      +2
      Quote: Jeremiah
      May be at the same time some sort of elaboration of the glider model

      Before sculpting in metal (composite), the glider is "blown" for months in a wind tunnel. I believe that your assumptions ... are not entirely correct. yes
      1. Jeremiah
        Jeremiah 7 August 2019 13: 03
        -4
        And let me ask, but they blow a life-size model?
      2. Jeremiah
        Jeremiah 7 August 2019 14: 31
        -4
        Manufacturers have long begun to abandon wind tunnel tests in favor of computer simulation technologies. To do this, engineers model the aerodynamics of the aircraft without creating a physical model. Well, you are still far from this. Although everything can be. A wind tunnel is yesterday, you are our competent and correct.
        And suppose that in TsAGI on t 101 you can blow out a model, and then translate it into metal. And since the Russian Federation designs and builds civilian aircraft with difficulty, it is better to run a new strategist in the air on a peculiar model and knock two birds with one stone. And get a new UAV and test the glider. Because for a long time nothing serious was designed and built
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 7 August 2019 16: 00
          +1
          Quote: Jeremiah
          A wind tunnel is yesterday, you are our competent and correct.

          1. Yesterday's, not yesterday's, but the models are blowing. There was even infa that TsAGI checked the layout of the "Angara" and after that made adjustments to its design.
          2. 100% guarantee does not give computer simulation. Therefore, this is only the stage of NOCR, but the model is material and more informative about the opinion of some designers of the old school.
          Unfortunately, this software did not allow achieving acceptable accuracy (we compared the air purge data in the pipe with the calculations in the program). True, this was before the introduction of the hybrid grid (modeling the boundary layer), but to a greater extent the problem is in the meager number of turbulence models. Available as a rule give an overestimated value of resistance (a problem of existing turbulence models). Disruptions of the flow are also poorly modeled (a common misfortune of RANS calculations).

          I am not an expert, but somehow, however. Yeah
          1. Jeremiah
            Jeremiah 7 August 2019 16: 36
            -3
            In general, we talked to a deaf person with a mute one))), But sharing knowledge and learning something new for yourself is always great. Especially on "Angara". Thanks.
  6. Professor
    Professor 7 August 2019 08: 39
    -19
    Thus, Russia in a very short time became one of the countries of the world that have the technology to create their own heavy shock drones.

    Yeah. He flew on a cord for two circles around the airfield and became a heavy shock drone. Is it too early to drink champagne?
    1. brr1
      brr1 7 August 2019 08: 57
      +11
      Quote: Professor
      Thus, Russia in a very short time became one of the countries of the world that have the technology to create their own heavy shock drones.

      Yeah. He flew on a cord for two circles around the airfield and became a heavy shock drone. Is it too early to drink champagne?

      Our Jewish skeptic. It’s morning in the yard, you have to smile and enjoy life, but here he leads with black colors over the window. What kind of people are you like, do not want to rejoice with others for their successes. Therefore, you probably do not like.
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 7 August 2019 09: 13
        +16
        Quote: brr1
        Our Jewish skeptic.

        An ordinary Jewish troll that is used here on Russia and all Russian
      2. gcn
        gcn 7 August 2019 09: 19
        +9
        I’ll correct not all the people, but only people who are sticking out competence in everything. The professor sometimes trolls or isn’t important from the mind of more than others or less. He is an active Jew, has been writing odes to Israel on the Russian-language resource for so many years using the Cyrillic alphabet, shutting up everyone who isn’t with him I agree this feature is only this person and not the entire population of Israel.
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 7 August 2019 10: 31
          +4
          Quote: gcn
          has been writing odes to Israel for so many years

          And how he licks his overseas sponsors ...
      3. aszzz888
        aszzz888 7 August 2019 10: 27
        0
        brr1 (Makar) Today, 08: 57 ... Therefore, they do not like you surely.....

        I suspect for sure.
    2. Lieutenant colonel
      Lieutenant colonel 7 August 2019 09: 16
      +10
      Yes, and our lace is too short, and the "snouts" are not washed, etc. Yes "professor"? And all that we have is bad and crooked, only the cartoon union works ...
      Oh you wretched ..... when will you end ....
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 7 August 2019 09: 39
        +9
        Quote: Reserve lieutenant colonel
        Oh you wretched ..... when will you end ....

        In the morning ... and so categorically! And if you think about it?
        1. The Jews are by no means poor (that is, with God ...) They are just "exiled by God"! (True, the Jews themselves believe that the "chosen by God" is an erroneous opinion!) Therefore, as they left Egypt, they wandered without the Promised Land until I.V. Stalin did not "procure" them a British mandated Palestine ... instead of the Soviet Crimea. Yeah, really ...
        2. It is unlikely that the Jews will ever "run out". And it is unfair to hear such a "desire" from a civilian brow! The people, I must admit, are mostly talented, cunning and inventive, since they managed to carry their identity through the centuries under conditions of persecution ... Let them live peacefully. BUT ONLY PEACEFUL !!!
        IMHO.
        1. Lieutenant colonel
          Lieutenant colonel 7 August 2019 09: 46
          +2
          I didn’t mention the commentator’s nationality anywhere.
          The nationality of the commentator is absolutely parallel to me.
          Do not deny the obvious facts and successes of my country.
          Do not forget about where the legs of the UAV and network-centrics in the fighting grow from.
          1. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 7 August 2019 09: 50
            +2
            Quote: Reserve lieutenant colonel
            Do not forget about where the legs of the UAV and network-centrics in the fighting grow from.

            And where do you think they grow from? belay
            1. Lieutenant colonel
              Lieutenant colonel 7 August 2019 10: 00
              0
              Interest Ask.
              Have you heard anything about the ASUV Maneuver, or the BSR Flight, Wing, and the time of their appearance in the USSR Armed Forces?
              1. Boa kaa
                Boa kaa 7 August 2019 10: 29
                +3
                Quote: Reserve lieutenant colonel
                Have you heard anything about ASUV Maneuver

                Respected! We are not at a seminar or standings on tactics and ASUV! And the second one. Why trifle something - the Centaur and Redoubt would immediately have stuck here! And then, about the Tupolev 143r only the lazy one does not know. Stop getting smart: answering a question with a question is a sign of bad taste! As a subject for further discussion, you have ceased to interest me. Litter.
                1. Lieutenant colonel
                  Lieutenant colonel 8 August 2019 02: 28
                  0
                  Have a nice one you too....
          2. Errr
            Errr 7 August 2019 10: 15
            -1
            Quote: Reserve lieutenant colonel
            Do not forget about where the UAV legs grow from ...
            Legs, wings ... The main thing is the tail!)))
    3. Kurare
      Kurare 7 August 2019 09: 19
      +3
      Quote: Professor
      Is it too early to drink champagne?

      hi No, not early. Participants in projects of this kind around the world are doing just that, and in Israel too. It is like having a baby. What it will be in the end is another question. I hope that it will be exactly who I thought it would be. Then, we’ll open not only the bottle, but the whole box! wink
      1. Professor
        Professor 7 August 2019 11: 13
        +3
        Quote: Kurare
        No, not early. Participants in projects of this kind around the world are doing just that, and in Israel too.

        ... but without saying such nonsense: "Thus, Russia in a very short time became one of the countries of the world that have technologies to create their own heavy attack drones."
        Firstly, not very short.
        Secondly, what are these Technology were inaccessible to Russia before this "historic" flight? what technologically new in this papelats?
        Thirdly, it will be possible to call the drone shock only after demonstrating it IMPACT abilities.

        In the meantime, the drone made a SUCCESSFUL test flight with which I congratulate the Russians. love

        Quote: Kurare
        It is like having a baby. What it will be in the end is another question. I hope that it will be exactly who I thought it would be. Then, we’ll open not only the bottle, but the whole box!

        That’s what I wrote about.
        1. Kurare
          Kurare 7 August 2019 11: 46
          0
          Quote: Professor
          ... but without saying such nonsense:

          Everyone has their own perception of the world. For someone and 100 years (exaggerate) a short time.
          Quote: Professor
          Second, what such technologies were not available to Russia before this "historic" flight?

          I would also like to know. Yes, it is unlikely that neither I nor you will be told this in the near future.
          Quote: Professor
          Thirdly, it will be possible to call the drone shock only after demonstrating it IMPACT abilities.

          Yes and no. If the "Hunter" was originally created as a percussion, then it is so. Again, how much this function prevails in him and how well he will cope with his tasks - time will tell.
          Quote: Professor
          In the meantime, the drone made a SUCCESSFUL test flight with which I congratulate the Russians.

          Another thing! drinks
          PS: I agree with you on many things. Journalists are now "crumbling". Too much pathos and unprofessionalism. Well, so no one forces us to take everything on faith. Filtering! ))
          1. Professor
            Professor 7 August 2019 13: 06
            +2
            Quote: Kurare
            Everyone has their own perception of the world. For someone and 100 years (exaggerate) a short time.

            Naturally. That is why I here express only my personal opinion.

            Quote: Kurare
            I would also like to know. Yes, it is unlikely that neither I nor you will be told this in the near future.

            Neither will tell so there are no new technologies there. There is a new design.

            Quote: Kurare
            Yes and no. If the "Hunter" was originally created as a percussion, then it is so. Again, how much this function prevails in him and how well he will cope with his tasks - time will tell.

            When it "hits" then we will call it shock. In the meantime, this is the maximum platform. Although today it is not difficult to make an attack drone. Even the Persians have them.

            Quote: Kurare
            PS: I agree with you on many things. Journalists are now "crumbling". Too much pathos and unprofessionalism. Well, so no one forces us to take everything on faith. Filtering! ))

            good
        2. brr1
          brr1 7 August 2019 13: 45
          +1
          Quote: Professor
          Firstly, not very short.
          Second, what such technologies were not available to Russia before this "historic" flight? What's technologically new about this papelace?
          Thirdly, it will be possible to call a drone shock only after the demonstration of its shock capabilities.

          Firstly, the character that you had on your avatar said something for relativity, so the size of the terms can only be considered in relation to some kind of scale or schedule.
          Secondly, one can talk about the accessibility or inaccessibility of certain technologies only by knowing which ones are applied specifically there and whether a particular state had access to specific technologies at a particular moment in time.
          Thirdly, after demonstrating its shock capabilities, we can talk about confirming the capabilities laid down in it and the degree of its compliance with the original TTZ.
          And the rest is idle talk for those who are too lazy today to answer the bullshit of the Israeli point of view.
    4. aszzz888
      aszzz888 7 August 2019 10: 33
      0
      Professor (Oleg Sokolov) Today, 08: 39
      -9 Is it too early to drink champagne?

      It's time !!! drinks ... but not about your honor hi
      Confirmed information about first full flight test Russian shock heavy drone "Hunter".
  7. crazyzerg
    crazyzerg 7 August 2019 08: 43
    -1
    Take-off just near work. If you take a picture and put it here - it will not be a swindle? ;)
    1. brr1
      brr1 7 August 2019 08: 52
      0
      Quote: crazyzerg
      Take-off just near work. If you take a picture and put it here - it will not be a swindle? ;)

      And what will we see there? Concrete slabs and lights?
      1. crazyzerg
        crazyzerg 8 August 2019 05: 56
        0
        video as flies.
    2. abrakadabre
      abrakadabre 7 August 2019 09: 01
      +1
      If you take a picture and put it here - it will not be a swindle? ;)
      You don’t ask us. And in the first section of this very take-off.
  8. 123456789
    123456789 7 August 2019 09: 50
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    Is it too early to drink champagne?

    How long did it take from the first flight of the T-50 to the first serial Su-57? And why will this period be shorter for the S-70 Okhotnik UAV?
    1. 123456789
      123456789 7 August 2019 15: 05
      +1

      The Ministry of Defense published a video of the first flight of the UAV “Hunter”
      1. brr1
        brr1 7 August 2019 15: 44
        +1
        Quote: 123456789

        The Ministry of Defense published a video of the first flight of the UAV “Hunter”

        He said "let's go" and washed it down with butter
  9. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 7 August 2019 10: 10
    +8
    This is an important milestone. Controlling a tailless flying wing is not easy. Experience will come in handy for the future PAK YES. Perhaps for this they created this drone - to check the calculations for PAK YES.
    1. Ugolek
      Ugolek 7 August 2019 12: 10
      +2
      Whoever writes bad things about Hunter, but this is a really big step and only a few countries can afford it, not only financially, but first of all with their brains, so this is a success anyway.
    2. Elephant
      Elephant 7 August 2019 14: 58
      0
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Controlling a tailless flying wing is not easy.

      This is the problem. I would like to note that our "overseas partner" has long successfully solved this and other problems on the RQ-170, F-117, V-2, X-47.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 7 August 2019 15: 02
        +3
        Well, Russia has begun to close the gap. good
        1. Elephant
          Elephant 7 August 2019 15: 25
          0
          I'd like to believe in a miracle. With regards to the striped, in this direction they are closely engaged in the four largest and competing corporations.
        2. okko077
          okko077 8 August 2019 00: 21
          -2
          How interesting! There is no and cannot be a simple drone of this class, the coverage is no more than 150 km, there is no information coverage as such, everything is from the remote control, everything is unique ... And what is being reduced? This is about the Persians and about the Chinese .... You need to be able to distinguish between UAVs and toys with a remote control even if they are shock ... Here the audience is simply funny with their knowledge and news about another toy of 20 tons chews at a time ....