Discrediting the Communist Party. What is wrong with modern communists?

285
The last presidential election for the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, it would seem, should have sobered the party leadership. After all, the result, to put it mildly, is depressing. In the presidential election of 2012, the candidate of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and permanent leader Gennady Zyuganov scored more than 17% of the votes, having doubled the nearest pursuer. But in the 2018 year, when the party very controversially nominated Pavel Grudinina as a candidate, the representative of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation barely overcame the threshold in 10% of votes. Common sense suggests that it is time to work on the bugs. And, apparently, it was held. True, it is not clear in which direction - to revive or ruin?

Discrediting the Communist Party. What is wrong with modern communists?

Rally in St. Petersburg 24 July




July St. Petersburg 24 held a rally called "Against arbitrariness in the elections in St. Petersburg" (meaning elections of the governor and municipal deputies of St. Petersburg 8 September 2019 of the year). The rally united more than ten different organizations. Specific citizens from the ranks of professional oppositionists were present there, including Maxim Reznik, who recently broke out on the topic of narcotic drugs. In the crowd, flags of such pro-Western parties as “Yabloko”, “Growth Party”, as well as many rags of various liberal movements, traditionally swarming around Navalny or Yashin, were waving.


Rally in St. Petersburg 24 July


And now the red flags of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation flew over the heads of this public, and the leader of the “communists” in that event was not anyone, but Vladimir Bortko himself. The participation of the patriotic party in such an action already raises questions of political cleanliness. But the situation was aggravated by a group of thugs who were waving flags ... of Ukraine and the European Union. And, of course, the agreed rally "for fair elections" could not keep within the framework of this topic. There were even appeals in support of citizen Sobol, which has nothing to do with St. Petersburg and conducts its “struggle” in Moscow. As a result, the forces that brought out the representatives of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, just played the extras for the pro-Western opposition. Total police counted 2200 participants.

Gandalf the Red to the rescue


It would seem an isolated case. Just a set of political blunders - a naive hope for the decency of pro-Western colleagues, multiplied by the obligatory presence of provocateurs in such crowds, which even experienced organizations in politics do not want to filter. However, this case is just a link in a whole chain of blatantly provocative blunders that raise new questions.

So, in the same St. Petersburg citizen Emma Ryman is running for municipal deputies from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Before rushing into politics, although the responsibilities of the Mundeps are unusually far from the loud slogans put forward by the candidates, Emma took place as a parapsychologist, psychic, esoteric and participant in the Black White show.



According to the Daily Storm online publication, citizen Ryman, besides her specific “professional” activity, has a number of other merits to society, which she longs to do good. Before becoming a member of the Communist Party, Emma was a member of the Yabloko party for a year. And Ryman left this party not because of ideological disagreements or because of the declared program, but because she couldn’t find a common language with Maxim Katz (another fighter “for ours and yours”), suspecting the latter of corruption.

In a personal interview with the Daily Storm, the newly-minted Communist revealed even more, covering voters with a portion of suspicion of the party filters and the principles of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. So, when asked why, in slogans, Emma brought out the phrase “magic of red”, she replied:
“Red is the color of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the color of dynamics, activity and victory. Plus we go through Krasnoselsky district. Why magic? She talks about miracles, and together with the team we will demonstrate these miracles. We will show what can be done by five simple people who are not indifferent to the life of citizens in their native district. It will be a miracle - a miracle that no one expects. "


Regarding her belief in magic, Ryman answered the following:
“Esoterics is based on the knowledge of our ancestors. This knowledge is rooted in observing nature, the animal world, the world of people, and the stars. There is a huge storehouse of knowledge! We cannot make any discoveries in science, if we rely only on classical science, on what is known to our time. Pay attention that all well-known serious figures, scientists made their discoveries at the junction of the rational and the irrational. In one way or another, they were all connected with religion or they professed ancient cults. ”




No, the author is not a prude or a snob. He loves abandoned objects with a strong energy, which, however, is expressed in goose bumps running along the back, and clambered almost all the dolmens of the Black Sea coast, even met the dawn on the top of the Nexus mountain (Gelendzhik) near the ancient dolmen complex. But in the political struggle it is important not only to defend their views, but also to take a pragmatic approach to winning the votes themselves, and the existence of a “battle mage” is a dubious idea.

Shaman warrior goes to overthrow Putin


But Emma Ryman is not alone in the cage of the opposition, attracting supernatural forces to the political struggle. Already that month a resident of Yakutia Alexander Gabyshev is marching along the roads of Russia with unhurried pace. Citizen Gabyshev himself calls himself a warrior-shaman. The purpose of his journey in Soviet times would be interested perhaps in the employees of a psychiatric hospital. This is what Alexander himself claims:
“God told me that Putin is not a man, but a demon, and I must expel him. Here I go to expel. For the time being, by peaceful means - by popular assemblies, rallies. And if it does not work out by peaceful means, there will be others. ”


Alexander can be met on the tracks of our vast Motherland harnessed to a wagon, on which he carries his simple belongings. Coming out of Yakutia in the spring, he makes 20 km per day and goes to bed in a tent at sunset.


Alexander Gabyshev


Of course, such an act instantly attracted oppositionists of all stripes. And if for the pro-Western liberal wing, in the order of things, to identify with marginal citizens like the pseudo-artist Petit Pavlensky, who recently left the French psychiatric clinic, the appearance of a representative of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation in the way of a shaman-warrior was clearly not expected.

On the approach of Alexander to Chita, he was first met by a candidate for the city duma from the Communist Party, the namesake Alexander Zhdanov. The communist not only greeted the shaman-warrior, but also harnessed himself in his carriage, explaining this act in the following words:
“We are carrying what future Russia will be built on. That Russia where there will be freedom, that in which human rights will be observed. That Russia, which is waiting for the people. Russia without Putin. "


If we take into account the contents of the cart, then we must admit: Zhdanov left us a little for the foundation of the future. All of this quickly spread around the global network as early as July 8 of this year, and as early as July 12 of this year local members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation agreed to hold a rally. Thus, comrades from Moscow had four days to get in touch with the local branch and coordinate the overly zealous impulses of their party members to gain popularity and recognition.

However, no one to chit the Chita communists did not. And on July 12, a rally under the slogans “Russia without Putin”, “Beggars are a disgrace of the government” and “We will revive people's courts” was held in the capital of the Trans-Baikal Territory. The highlight of the program was the shaman-warrior Alexander, who pushed the speech in his own way of self-exclusion. I don’t see the point literally as this because the network is replete with videos of this speaker. Alexander graduated simply: "From now on, you will not decree - live free!"



Attraction of shamans-warriors and red magicians to the political struggle is nonsense in itself, but let me remind you that this party does, representatives of the Sverdlovsk branch of which opposed the construction of the cathedral in Yekaterinburg only in May, standing on anti-clerical positions. Those. Shamans and magicians - this is acceptable, but Orthodoxy - no?

A natural question arises: what happens inside the CPRF? Is this malicious discrediting of a party that for almost 30 years has been a powerful competitor to all its opponents - from the ruling circles to the systemic opposition? The collapse of the natural ideological party filters? Losing the mechanism of managing your own branches in a fit of a game of democracy? Or a keen desire to rejuvenate the party at any cost, despite the attracted cadres? One way or another, but this figure of Russian political chess is losing strength in the most destructive way - from within. This can not but grieve, because in Russia there are practically no strong parties with a powerful ideological platform that are in the ranks of a systemic adequate opposition that does not allow the party in power to rest on its laurels.
285 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +66
    29 July 2019 15: 08
    But in the 2018 year, when the party very controversially nominated Pavel Grudinin as a candidate, the representative of the Communist Party barely overcame the threshold in 10% of the vote. Common sense dictates that it’s time to work on the bugs.
    Common sense tells us that to be a communist and to be him are completely different things.
    1. +17
      29 July 2019 15: 21
      A natural question arises: what is happening inside the Communist Party?
      Yes, the same as with the rest of the toy parties, it has long been clear that the entire "opposition" is pocket and the power of the United Russia is indivisible, all "elections" are far-fetched. Alas, this already looks like a regime.
      1. +23
        29 July 2019 15: 36
        Yeah! Lived !!! Communists of the Communist Party to a shame!
        Communists of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation are ideological degenerate liberalists and garbage anarchists, not the Communist Party!
        1. +11
          29 July 2019 16: 06
          Ha! Alexander Gabyshev is the same "freaky proletarian" laughing for degenerate members of the Communist Party!


          However, the Communists of the Communist Party can be partially understood - after all, the domestic non-marginalized proletariat in our country, in fact, can no longer be said after privatization in Russia!
          The Russian labor market is dominated by only foreign "labor" migrants - with their inviolable cultural roots and family ties in their countries of origin! Nafig they need the Communist Party !!!

          The Russian proletariat, in fact, is now fragmented in the Russian Federation — it is atimized — and you won’t go far in closed production at the Russian proletariat for the Communist Party!
          1. +5
            30 July 2019 10: 12
            I do not quite agree with the proletariat. I believe that in our time there is a new analogue of the "proletariat", and many times more numerous. These are hired workers in all spheres of activity, including middle-level managers, oddly enough. Yes, yes, now it is not peasant Russia of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Of course, all this mass of people can hardly be called that "pantsless" proletariat of the 1905 model. This is the "new proletariat". And thanks to the previous achievements of Soviet power, he is still sufficiently educated. While. The problem is that it is not the current Communist Party of the Russian Federation to raise it to fight for the rights of the working people. There is not even a need for rebranding, but a new party from scratch, uncompromising and merciless to the oligarchy and their henchmen. The problem of the "communist trend" is also that, it is not enough just to appeal to the achievements of the Stalinist and post-Stalinist periods, - one should also recognize the initially anti-Russian character of the October 1917 revolution (along with the out-of-order cosmopolitan "February"), - and this is not enough courage. and therefore - the very "dead end of communism". And the "new proletariat" is now a dime a dozen - Ilyich, as a manager of revolutions, would rub his hands on such a potential.
            1. -1
              30 July 2019 10: 20
              And I dare to add. I’m not familiar with the aforementioned person, Emma Ryman, but ... In the individual quotations cited, I don’t see anything that could be ridiculed and defamed .. Socialism is not viable without spirituality, the ideology of socialism does not live long in itself, - practice has shown, including futile attempts to create surrogates like the "Moral Code of the Builder of Communism." If all sorts of esotericists support the socialist idea, work for it, - yes, the flag is in their hands, if only practitioners would keep them closer to the earth.
              1. +4
                30 July 2019 14: 43
                Yeah. Chur me, chur, from such "spiritual" leaders.
                1. 0
                  1 August 2019 11: 20
                  Quote: puzoter
                  Yeah. Chur me, chur, from such "spiritual" leaders.

                  They can't wait to "reign" and repeat Novocherkassk throughout the country.
              2. +5
                30 July 2019 14: 46
                Ha! Andrew! You honestly killed me! drinks

                First of all. I agree with you that there is still some proletariat in our country. However, for the most part it is not centralized and unified.
                It is nevertheless necessary to take into account the historical era in which we are now living, before we compare the proletarian revolutionary possibilities of the 1917 of the year in Russia and now in Russia.

                Now there is a POSTindustrial era and foreign FINANCIAL capitalism, not production one. For world FINANCIAL capitalism in our country there is an overabundance of the indigenous population.

                Yes, the proletariat in our country still exists in some places, but for the most part it is marginalized due to the actual actual unemployment for the indigenous population in the domestic labor market, and in particular due to the foreign "labor" migration policy of our government - as recommended by the IMF. Marginalized due to the flows of official and illegal foreign migration, which in 1917 in our country did not have!

                These foreign "labor" migrants are not our people! They are strikebreakers for the Russians. Problems Russian proletarians they do not care at all, and even more than!
                Besides. Former Soviet enterprises are either completely closed, or for the most part transferred to the ownership and management of foreign or offshore owners and they have their own occupational-parasitic policies in our country.

                And secondly. T.N. individual entrepreneurs, the so-called "self-employed" citizens - this is by m / l. theories are no longer proletarians, but small-scale owners and proletarians no longer belong. After the NEP, they were all liquidated in Soviet Russia as a class.
                Psychic-charlotte Emma Rayman - who is it in the socio-political respect? This is a declassified element in the Communist Party and nothing more!

                REFERENCE
                Streikbra is a person who is usually hired during a strike, refuses to take part in a strike and supports strikers, takes the administration side in its dispute with strikers and supports her with her exit to work during the strike. In a figurative sense, a traitor, a traitor to the common interests of the proletariat, matters.
                1. +1
                  30 July 2019 16: 07
                  There was no talk about individual entrepreneurs and labor migrants. It was, in principle, about the number of employees who do not own the means of production, and about the average level of intellectual development of these workers. About the screams: about the shaman, I agree, obscurantism. About the declassed element in the form of esoterics - yes, declassed, yes, muddy. However, what the state of the party is, so is the "element". It’s a shame, yes, but the EP didn’t clean up its ranks at all and is not going to, everyone who is behind the crumbs from the table - all are taken as enthusiastic lower adepts, not to mention fellow travelers with money. So, I repeat once again, I did not see anything "criminal" in the texts of the tugged quotes. If the author of the article wanted to debunk the "pseudo-Rayman cult" and bring it to light, then this must be done properly, otherwise it looks like a banal "hau them, hau", and this discredits the critic himself.
                  1. +2
                    30 July 2019 16: 26
                    Quote: andrew42
                    About the screams: about the shaman, I agree, obscurantism. About the declassed element in the form of esoterics - yes, declassed, yes, muddy. However, what the state of the party is, so is the "element". It's a shame, yeah

                    stop Andrew! Well, and what claims may be to the author? The author told us the truth about the Communist Party in a short article. And you, in principle, agreed with the author about this. What is wrong for you?

                    Or do you think that there was no need to talk about this socio-political problem in the country? If so, then you should not think so. Communist Party Communist Party members must correct these shortcomings, and not suppress them.
                2. -1
                  31 July 2019 20: 05
                  Tatiana, excuse me, but there is no "our" or "not our" proletariat. He either is - or he is not. Generally.
                  With some kind of fright, lumpen (gests) and marginals (plankton) are enlisted in the proletariat. Yes, it may be a part, but it is only about. The most important thing is that it does not care where around, in Muscovy or in Addis Ababa. The same applies to individual entrepreneurs, state of emergency and others like that. The distinction is not only in the "sale of labor" (that is, time), but also in the acceptance of culture and values. And with this everything is complicated.
                  Rayman, of course, a typical marginal, here I agree with you :).
              3. -1
                30 July 2019 18: 15
                Andrei. I can imagine what kind of socialism you will build.
            2. 0
              30 July 2019 13: 43
              Quote: andrew42
              I believe that in our time there is a new analogue of the "proletariat", and many times more numerous.

              I agree with you, I believe that if the proletariat in the past united hostels, now the Internet ... Subsoil to the People !!!
              1. -1
                30 July 2019 15: 01
                If the proletariat again decides to organize a revolution, then it will end the same way - first the proletariat will be an instrument and shed rivers of its blood, and then a victim. GULAG for example. And there, of course, the bowels will await him - in the form of mines. Or fields in the form of sticks of workdays. But his bowels will never be. Proof of? Recalculate today's food prices to Soviet, and compare with the average salary. You will be surprised - almost one to one. It only means that both then and now, the proletariat was kept like cattle in a stall so that it would give meat, butter, milk and not die, but no more!
                1. +2
                  30 July 2019 22: 01
                  Quote: puzoter
                  If the proletariat again decides to arrange a revolution, then it will end as well.

                  bourgeois revolution? laughing
                  Quote: puzoter
                  and then a victim. GULAG for example.

                  Do you still believe in Solzhenitsyn’s tales? I grew up in the Magadan region, those camps were built of larch and permafrost, there were not many thousands in them, I saw you can go and see ... they are small, I have not seen more than 100 people. smile lol
                  Quote: puzoter
                  And there, of course, mineral resources will await him - in the form of mines
                  I meant oil and gas smile
                  Quote: puzoter
                  Recalculate today's food prices to Soviet, and compare with the average salary.
                  look at utility bills in Siberia and compare with the specific gravity of the average Moscow salary wassat
                  Quote: puzoter
                  But his bowels will never be.
                  as? and they won’t give to the grave ??? tongue
                  Quote: puzoter
                  It only says that both then and now, the proletariat was kept like cattle in a stall,
                  I remember the time when this cattle was cared for and cherished .... crying
                  1. 0
                    30 July 2019 22: 09
                    Quote: aybolyt678
                    look at utility bills in Siberia and compare with the specific gravity of the average Moscow salary

                    How's that?
                    1. +3
                      30 July 2019 22: 26
                      and so Puzotar compares the prices of food and Soviet-era salaries and concludes that they are up-to-date, forgetting that there are other payments besides products. Life has become more expensive
                  2. +1
                    1 August 2019 14: 49
                    Speaking about wages and mineral resources, I meant that the formal possession of mineral resources in the USSR did not make the people richer. Remember the notorious 120 rubles - the salary of an engineer. Now, according to the "product" index, today's ruble is moving towards the Soviet kopeck 1k1, plus or minus the margin of error. Those. 120r is about modern 12 thousand. Yes, subjectively, life has risen in price, because before there were no gadgets, no household appliances, no cars and there was nowhere to spend money. But in fact, little has changed in this regard since then. The only advantage of the Soviet system for an ordinary person was that they provided housing, but only in line it was necessary to defend 20 years. And then the question: was it worth it to destroy the country in the 17th century, die in millions in a civil war, miraculously rise from the ashes at the cost of the titanic labor of the entire population, in order to get the same output?
                    1. +1
                      1 August 2019 15: 06
                      Quote: puzoter
                      question: was it worth destroying the country in 17m,

                      thanks for the question! smile I suggest that you look at sites dedicated to the king, for example photos of peasants ... men in caps (luxury) women in white scarves .... but they are almost always barefoot !!! Peasants are 70 percent of the population of Russia until the age of 17! and find at least one photo of barefoot Soviet collective farmers after 35 years ?!
                      Compare cases of famine in tsarist times and in Soviet times
                      By the way, my parents received housing once in half a year, another time right away. The relatives of the cousin of the engineer were given housing six months after the birth of the child. Other relatives were given after 7 years. And 20 years are those scandalous cases that were fought with.
                      And I would advise you to read Lisichkin's book "The war after the war, the information occupation continues" is very scientific and very easy to read.
            3. 0
              5 August 2019 17: 53
              Quote: andrew42
              The anti-Russian character of the October 1917 revolution should also be recognized.

              what do you mean? not really a Zionist conspiracy ??? belay
        2. Underwater hunter
          +25
          29 July 2019 16: 47
          It’s not sad to state this fact, but it has a place to be .. The Communist Party had an interesting program when Grudinin ran for which I voted. I must say, and now I have a very positive attitude towards him. But the most annoying thing about the Communists is their passivity ... it is obvious that it is caused by fear for their property, and it follows from this that there really aren't any ideological ones there. I hope that the communists / socialists will have a personality who will lead. For the bottom is already real ..
          1. +13
            29 July 2019 17: 11
            Quote: Underwater Hunter
            The Communist Party had an interesting program when Grudinin ran for whom I voted

            I also voted for him, although for purely protest reasons - but it’s hardly possible to name the Communist Party’s program interesting — there was nothing interesting there, just populism, and even that wasn’t very sensible
            1. Underwater hunter
              +2
              29 July 2019 17: 14
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              there was nothing interesting there, just populism, and even that was not too sensible

              What did you see populism in? In my opinion, everything is more than real.
              1. +8
                29 July 2019 18: 43
                Quote: Underwater Hunter
                And what did you see populism in?

                The fact that this program (20 steps) is a set of good wishes that are pleasant to citizens, but completely not implemented in the current realities of the economy
                For example, the very first step
                We will nationalize strategically important and systemically important industries, electric power industry, railways, communication systems, leading banks

                will lead to a collapse - today the state has NO those who could manage all this. We have the Nabiullins and other Oreshkins, who cannot be allowed to enter the real sector of the economy.
                And the same thing - further, and a low interest rate, and powerful investments in industry, etc. etc., but here is where to get the money for it? The funny thing is, even currency billions of egg-caps will not help
                The minimum wage will be 25000-30000 rubles.

                And then - the complete financial incapacity of many enterprises.
                In general, Grudinin said pleasant, and by and large correct things, but it is impossible to implement them as he proposed.
                1. Underwater hunter
                  +6
                  29 July 2019 19: 15
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  will lead to a collapse - today the state has NO those who could manage all this. We have the Nabiullins and other Oreshkins, who cannot be allowed to enter the real sector of the economy.

                  I agree. But within a year, I think one could find managers ..

                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  And the same thing - further, and a low interest rate, and powerful investments in industry, etc. etc., but here is where to get the money for it?

                  And where did they get them before? The USSR has always been under sanctions, with several new cities appearing annually .. Only the nationalization of alcohol will yield 8 trillion. rub. we have all the alcohol now in private hands .. In general, in detail where to get the money Communist Party told ..
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  And then - the complete financial incapacity of many enterprises. In general, Grudinin said pleasant, and by and large correct things, but it is impossible to implement them as he proposed.

                  Perhaps it would certainly take time, but within three years, it was all possible to organize. Do not forget, all this has already happened. You just need to consider the mistakes of the past. Of course, in terms of trained personnel, I very much agree with you - this is a problem. But the road will be overpowered by the going, the main thing is to choose the right direction.
                  1. +5
                    29 July 2019 19: 38
                    Quote: Underwater Hunter
                    I agree. But within a year, I think one could find managers ..

                    There - the question of a complete restart of the work of the government of the Russian Federation - in the existing structure, it is unable to manage nationalized enterprises. And here the question is not only in personalities, but also in responsibility, and in the methods of planning and control, in everything.
                    All this can be done, but Grudinin does not say a word about it
                    Quote: Underwater Hunter
                    And where did they get them before? The USSR has always been under sanctions, with several new cities appearing annually ..

                    Exactly where? :)))) First of all, in the USSR they understood that money is the blood of the economy and printed so much that it was enough for normal trade. And the price increase was impossible because of their planned nature. We have now the amount of funds in the economy is artificially underestimated so as not to create inflation, which, of course, extremely limits the possibility of domestic investment. There are ways out of this situation, but Grudinin has nothing to say about it.
                    Quote: Underwater Hunter
                    Only the nationalization of alcohol will give 8 trillion. rub we have all the alcohol now in private hands ..

                    Yes, she will not give much, we have to tear excise taxes on producers, so they share their profit with the state more than fairly
                    Quote: Underwater Hunter
                    But the road will be overpowered by the traveler, the main thing is to choose the right direction.

                    Therefore, I voted for Grudinin ...
                    1. Underwater hunter
                      0
                      29 July 2019 19: 47
                      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                      Exactly where? :)))) First of all, in the USSR they understood that money is the blood of the economy and printed so much that it was enough for normal trade. And the price increase was impossible because of their planned nature. We have now the amount of funds in the economy is artificially underestimated so as not to create inflation, which, of course, extremely limits the possibility of domestic investment. There are ways out of this situation, but Grudinin has nothing to say about it.

                      I think that they just didn’t paint it in detail. But what you write about is really very important.
                      1. +7
                        29 July 2019 23: 08
                        the fact that the CPSU program and Grudinin’s statements are categorically opposed, didn’t you notice?
                        About the fact that the dollar millionaire (owner of 95% of the shares of ZAO Kolkhoz ..) - would be at the head of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation .... belay belay
                        I think Lenin would get up and leave the Mausoleum - so as not to see such a disgrace of the Communists
                      2. +1
                        29 July 2019 23: 18
                        Quote: your1970
                        the fact that the CPSU program and Grudinin’s statements are categorically opposed, didn’t you notice?

                        Can I ask? You yourself who in life? Miner, accountant, intellectual?
                      3. +3
                        29 July 2019 23: 40
                        Quote: mordvin xnumx
                        Quote: your1970
                        the fact that the CPSU program and Grudinin’s statements are categorically opposed, didn’t you notice?

                        Can I ask? You yourself who in life? Miner, accountant, intellectual?
                        -you will not believe-I "prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr bureaucrat-bureaucrat-civil servant !!" feel recourse request lol

                        just being a villager (and then a military man) - I watched a lot of such sternum in 90. Each collective farm had its own, or even a couple of .....
                        that is why the village will never vote en masse for such people, have seen enough of them in 90 ...
                      4. 0
                        29 July 2019 23: 45
                        Quote: your1970
                        you will not believe me, "prrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr bureaucrat-bureaucrat-civil servant !!"

                        I believe it! Hello, hello from the working class! Here you bureaucrats shod me on 2 thousand rubles. Doing wrong. feel
                      5. +1
                        29 July 2019 23: 58
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        Here you bureaucrats shod me on 2 thousand rubles. Not doing well
                        -we ?? !!! for scho ??? !!
                      6. +1
                        30 July 2019 00: 05
                        Because I have expired my passport. For two weeks ..
                      7. -2
                        30 July 2019 07: 33
                        Quote: Mordvin 3
                        Because I have expired my passport. For two weeks

                        SЌS,Rѕ RІS <PI RєR ° RєRѕR№ S,Rѕ S,RμRјRμ RїSЂRѕ SЂRѕRіR ° RєR ° RєRoRμ S,Rѕ RІRμS,RІRoSЃS,S <Rμ RїRoSЃR ° F "Ryo P · R ‡ ° RїSЂRѕSЃSЂRѕS RμRЅRЅS <R№ RїR ° SЃRїRѕSЂS ‚.
                        дискредитР° С † РёСЏ РІР »Р ° сти РѕРґРЅР ° РєРѕ .. laughing
                      8. 0
                        30 July 2019 07: 38
                        Quote: Antares
                        SЌS,Rѕ RІS <PI RєR ° RєRѕR№ S,Rѕ S,RμRјRμ RїSЂRѕ SЂRѕRіR ° RєR ° RєRoRμ S,Rѕ RІRμS,RІRoSЃS,S <Rμ RїRoSЃR ° F "Ryo P · R ‡ ° RїSЂRѕSЃSЂRѕS RμRЅRЅS <R№ RїR ° SЃRїRѕSЂS ‚.
                        дискредитР° С † РёСЏ РІР »Р ° сти РѕРґРЅР ° РєРѕ ..

                        Р ”Р ° противны Рµ Р »СЋРґРё РѕРЅРё РІСЃРµ. R'S З РµСЂР ° С € трР° С „СѓРїР” Р ° тиР», С ‰ Р ° СЃ РїРѕР№РґСѓ РІ РћР'Р Р, РїР ° СЃРїРѕСЂРёРЅСѓ РїРѕР» СѓС ‡ Р ° С CЊ. РќР ° деюсь, РµС ‰ С 'РЅРµ РЅР ° РІРµС € Р ° СЋС ‚С З С‚Рѕ-РЅРёР ± СѓРґСЊ. crying
                      9. +2
                        30 July 2019 00: 51
                        Quote: your1970
                        About the fact that the dollar millionaire (owner of 95% of the shares of ZAO Kolkhoz ..) would be at the head of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation ..

                        And I am of the same opinion! And I do not understand those who "admire" Grudinin! Found a "communist"! This is a real "bourgeois" with all the "symptoms" of a capitalist: he hides millions in foreign money boxes; has a hired labor force and, at every "convenient" occasion, engulfs the workers, appropriates the people's property!
                      10. +1
                        30 July 2019 15: 05
                        They are mesmerized by a mustache.
                      11. 0
                        31 July 2019 01: 04
                        Mustache is a terrible force for some. They cannot resist. Behold the new state back.
                    2. +4
                      29 July 2019 22: 49
                      Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                      Therefore, I voted for Grudinin ...

                      In a state where the ruling class is the bourgeoisie, all these systemic non-systemic parties are the spokesmen of the interests of the bourgeoisie. As grandfather Lenin teaches us. smile
                    3. -1
                      30 July 2019 14: 59
                      You voted the sidekick man Berezovsky.
                  2. -3
                    2 August 2019 13: 14
                    I agree. But within a year, I think one could find managers ..

                    Yes, uzhzhzh. "Deep thought". You at least concern the economy of the enterprise ??? Minus!!!
                2. +6
                  29 July 2019 23: 47
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  Quote: Underwater Hunter
                  And what did you see populism in?

                  The fact that this program (20 steps) is a set of good wishes that are pleasant to citizens, but completely not implemented in the current realities of the economy
                  For example, the very first step
                  We will nationalize strategically important and systemically important industries, electric power industry, railways, communication systems, leading banks

                  will lead to a collapse - today the state has NO those who could manage all this. We have the Nabiullins and other Oreshkins, who cannot be allowed to enter the real sector of the economy.
                  And the same thing - further, and a low interest rate, and powerful investments in industry, etc. etc., but here is where to get the money for it? The funny thing is, even currency billions of egg-caps will not help
                  The minimum wage will be 25000-30000 rubles.

                  And then - the complete financial incapacity of many enterprises.
                  In general, Grudinin said pleasant, and by and large correct things, but it is impossible to implement them as he proposed.


                  Nationalization in short - this means socially significant industries
                  - Housing and communal services to remove layers that profit from all of us
                  - Energy is the same, if you know that we sell electricity and gas to China three times cheaper than for ourselves (and at the same time we earn)
                  - Banks do the same, but should be for the people.
                  Now, having come to Sberbank myself, paying my money in cash, I still pay a percentage for this (payment of housing and communal services) .. well, isn’t it funny?
                  - The railway is the same, and more often children will be sent and there will be dynamics.

                  And with all this, while getting 25-35 people will "invest" in flights or trips around Russia, etc., if you have confidence in the future, which will also affect demographics ...

                  In general, we have rot in power, in any case for those who are not power-hungry and who are ready to lick the fairy tale king’s boots, and he just needs to keep his throne, the backstage can mature, so you need to keep everything and soak everyone in toilet, if only they would not tear the control thread.
                  This is all visible, the hand-held henchmen who are allowed to warm their hands if only they would vote for the king in unison ...
                3. +1
                  30 July 2019 13: 53
                  Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
                  will lead to a collapse - the state today has NO

                  here ... here systemic steps are needed, ideological. An idea is needed that is close to everyone, And if everything is in state hands and the idea is consumer, then the state will surely get kirdyk
            2. +4
              29 July 2019 22: 42
              Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
              I also voted for him, although for purely protest reasons

              I also voted for the Communist Party from protest reasons. Until I realized that this is just fabulous stupidity. laughing The best thing that could have been done in the last election was to boycott them with protests.
            3. DPN
              +1
              29 July 2019 22: 54
              Still, it’s very simple what the working class is, the Communist Party is also like that, so don’t get to hell if you yourself didn’t get out.
              1. 0
                29 July 2019 23: 09
                Quote: DPN
                Still, it’s very simple what the working class is, the Communist Party is also like that, so don’t get to hell if you yourself didn’t get out.

                You would have told the storyteller what side of the Communist Party to the working class.
          2. +6
            29 July 2019 19: 58
            I think the Communist Party is working for the long term and maintaining the communist idea as such. After all, it is quite obvious that the communist movement is being uprooted around the world. I always vote for the Communist Party because it is the most worthy party in the political arena.
            1. +4
              29 July 2019 21: 16
              I agree, it's better for the Communists than for United Russia. The communists are now a lesser evil.
              1. +9
                29 July 2019 22: 52
                Quote: Fan-Fan
                The communists are now a lesser evil.

                Still in the Communist Party were the Communists. It would be quite wonderful. laughing
              2. +2
                29 July 2019 23: 10
                United Russia is not people at all, but the functions of their pleasure centers and relatives of talented businessmen and businessmen, starting from Volodin ending Metelsky.
              3. +2
                30 July 2019 01: 16
                Quote: Fan-Fan
                I agree, it's better for the Communists than for United Russia. The communists are now a lesser evil.

                That's just the people left ...: try to determine the lesser evil and choose ... this evil!
                1. DPN
                  +1
                  30 July 2019 08: 48
                  people chose in 1991, or rather didn’t even choose, but passed.
            2. +7
              29 July 2019 22: 51
              Quote: Campanella
              I think the Communist Party is working for the long term and maintaining the communist idea as such.

              Communist Party works on capital. Do not be so naive.
              Quote: Campanella
              I always vote for the Communist Party because it is the most worthy party in the political arena.

              You yourself are not funny?
              1. +2
                29 July 2019 23: 05
                Do you want them to be ideological people? Leninist revolutionaries, too, made a revolution for money, and not small ones. They even engaged in expropriation. So do not be naive, everyone needs money until a communist society of the future is built.
                1. +6
                  29 July 2019 23: 08
                  Quote: Campanella
                  Do you want them to be ideological people?

                  What does it have to do with it? Where do you see Communist revolutionary rhetoric in the Communist Party? All they can do is whine and complain.
                  1. +2
                    29 July 2019 23: 46
                    What do you have for revolutionary rhetoric? Rhetoric itself does not mean anything unless supported by action. Power is engaged in rhetoric in our country ... but not in the economy.
                    1. 0
                      31 July 2019 21: 23
                      Quote: Campanella
                      if not backed up by action.

                      Let's not talk about this at all? Otherwise, the Communist Party looks very sorry.
                      1. 0
                        1 August 2019 17: 37
                        You do not like the Communist Party, I can understand this, can you say who you are for?
                  2. 0
                    31 July 2019 15: 43
                    You need rhetoric. In the Communist Party program, building socialism is the goal.
                    1. -1
                      31 July 2019 21: 24
                      Quote: Campanella
                      You need rhetoric. In the Communist Party program, building socialism is the goal.

                      Yeah, unattainable. laughing
                      1. 0
                        1 August 2019 17: 36
                        With your logic, people would still live in a cave.
            3. +1
              31 July 2019 11: 43
              I've been doing the same thing since 1996. But, unfortunately, by the method of exclusion, as for the only party, as declaring the protection of the interests of the working person. Unfortunately, because here too we have conformism with the ruling oligarchy. Secondly, every 5 years I watch with horror how the electorate of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, step by step, melts away, how the impoverished population, with some kind of frenzy, pokes their faces at the candidates of the "Putin party" and successive pro-bourgeois promising parties.
        3. +4
          29 July 2019 17: 09
          Quote: Tatiana
          Communists of the Communist Party to a shame!

        4. 0
          29 July 2019 19: 32
          Oh, you are a connoisseur of the true communist idea!
          1. -2
            30 July 2019 00: 00
            Quote: Campanella
            Oh, you are a connoisseur of the true communist idea!

            And what, in the photo are the individuals united by a common idea? I wonder which one? feel
            1. 0
              30 July 2019 00: 01
              And where does the photo come from? The replica was on another post.
              1. 0
                30 July 2019 00: 03
                Quote: Campanella
                And where does the photo?

                How do you comment on the photo?
                1. +2
                  30 July 2019 10: 12
                  And why comment, a political leader can meet with anyone. Make a sensation out of it?
                  Trump met with Kim Jong Il ... Europeans with Gaddafi so what?
                  1. 0
                    30 July 2019 12: 33
                    Quote: Campanella
                    And why comment, a political leader can meet with anyone. Make a sensation out of it?

                    Therefore, people do not believe the Communists (in this case). Tired of people lying. request
                    1. -1
                      30 July 2019 15: 42
                      What a lie, what nonsense?
        5. +1
          30 July 2019 01: 11
          Quote: Tatiana
          Communists of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation are ideological degenerate liberalists and garbage anarchists, not the Communist Party!
          But what, it was not clear at the time of Yeltsin?
          The Communist Party was founded and lived at the expense of mimicry.
          People who believe in the CPSU are leaving, mimicry is getting worse.
        6. +1
          31 July 2019 13: 48
          The very name of the Communist Party implies conciliation. This party is not popular and in fact has ceased to be even a conditionally opposition capitalist code of the government of the Russian Federation.

          The only People’s Communist Party was the CPSU (B.)
      2. +5
        29 July 2019 15: 39
        +1 The elections in our country are a farce ... The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is far from ideal, but it is the only real party today, whose program is aimed at developing the country, and not at its final destruction ...
      3. +1
        29 July 2019 15: 48
        For a long time with the leaders of the Communist Party, it is clear and appreciated by the real Communists of the old leaven.
        They are terribly far from Marxism and Leninism.
        To understand what happened to the communist movement, discover for yourself - Mikhail Vasilyevich Popov - Doctor of Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Social Philosophy and Philosophy of History at Leningrad State University, President of the Workers' Academy Fund, editor-in-chief of the newspaper Narodnaya Pravda
        for example
        1. -3
          29 July 2019 22: 54
          The same demagogue as the kenguryan, grandfather siu and other trebleggers.
          1. 0
            29 July 2019 23: 07
            All the same, ZU leads the party, but this one is just yapping.
            1. +2
              29 July 2019 23: 11
              Quote: Campanella
              All the same, ZU leads the party, but this one is just yapping.

              What is the difference if the result is the same?
              1. -2
                29 July 2019 23: 44
                One is responsible only for itself, and the other for a large group of like-minded people and to some extent for the country and its future.
                1. 0
                  31 July 2019 21: 25
                  Quote: Campanella
                  One is responsible only for itself, and the other for a large group of like-minded people and to some extent for the country and its future.

                  That is, there is no qualitative difference.
                  1. -1
                    1 August 2019 17: 24
                    Your chatter, this is about nothing.
        2. +2
          29 July 2019 23: 26
          Quote: To be or not to be
          with the leaders of the Communist Party clearly and given them the assessment of the real communists of the old sourdough.

          It is not necessary to perceive the Communist Party as 100% followers of the ideas of Marxism-Leninism. In today's state, they are more social democrats.
      4. -3
        29 July 2019 15: 55
        Quote: Aerodrome
        it already sounds like a mode.

        Well, not bad, the regime will benefit many, because there are a lot of people who are too smart, but absolutely useless at the same time. And energy is useless - only "to heat the street", which, by the way, is what such organisms do. Yes
      5. AUL
        -1
        30 July 2019 06: 50
        Quote: Aerodrome
        A natural question arises: what is happening inside the Communist Party?
        Yes, the same as with the rest of the toy parties, it has long been clear that the entire "opposition" is pocket and the power of the United Russia is indivisible, all "elections" are far-fetched. Alas, this already looks like a regime.

        All of you write correctly.
        There is such an old omen: if edro starts actively aboutbsirspit on the "opposition" - therefore, wait for some elections! No?
      6. 0
        30 July 2019 15: 13
        it already sounds like a mode

        Any state is a regime. Totalitarian regime, authoritarian regime ... Well, these are familiar phrases. But there may be a democratic regime. In Germany, in the States ...
    2. +13
      29 July 2019 15: 22
      Yes, this is the "secret" that now they are not communists, but "like communists"! request
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +12
      29 July 2019 15: 38
      being called a communist and being him are completely different things.

      Yes, God bless him with communism. Obviously, both Zu and Grudinin are not communists at all, maybe they are even smaller communists than you and I. By the way, I wrote about this on the site, for which I earned a lot of minuses. Well, let there be at least just a normal left SOCIALLY oriented party. The demand for this is big, I would say huge. Even I, with all my dislike for the Communist Party, would support. But no, they’re messing about such bastards ..... There are few of them European Union flags, soon rainbow-colored ones will appear, and there are not far from the swastikas.
      1. 0
        29 July 2019 21: 30
        Revive the RSDLP? , and the Communists in the furnace of history ....
    5. +2
      29 July 2019 21: 13
      in Russia, there are practically no strong parties with a powerful ideological platform that are in the ranks of an adequate systemic opposition that does not allow the party to rest on its laurels.

      Great resume!
      All this "tame opposition" is already causing a nauseating effect!
      I can wait until, according to the old "communist tradition," Zyuganov's "vertebrae in his pants" will fall, but he will not leave the post! laughing
    6. +1
      30 July 2019 15: 56
      Now no one will ever remember what it means to be a communist. Who will be able to master "Capital" or the works of Lenin now? Clip thinking teenagers? And from a living example of a real communist, who is left? Unattractive characters like Zyu, Grudinina and Ryman. So ... Only phantom pains remained of communism.
      1. -3
        30 July 2019 22: 15
        Quote: puzoter
        Unappealing characters like Sue, Grudinin, and Ryman.

        They are anyone, but not communists.
        Quote: puzoter
        Only phantom pains remained from communism.

        Only in your head is a monarchist a storyteller. You do not understand nichrome what communism is. And whistle about clip thinking. First, at least a little try to understand what Karl Marx tried to explain to you and the other boobies, and then get smart.
        1. +2
          31 July 2019 11: 56
          Karl Marx is a more than ambiguous personality. If it were not for the Stalinists, then the new red Marxist elite of Russia would have devoured Russia (Soviet / not Soviet / any) and the Russian people. and would say that this is an objective historical process. Karl Marx wrote a "tool" for the struggle against the national bourgeoisie, but kept silent about the purpose of its application, namely: the replacement of the national bourgeois elite with the Zionist elite. This does not diminish the value of Marx's "hammer" striking capitalism. However, the demonic "internationalism" of the then Marxists broke the traditional systems of value of nations and peoples, and broke worse than the capitalist rust. The current European tolerance is also a product of those "Marxists" of the early 20th century, not the Chamberlains, and not the Roosevelts.
          1. -3
            31 July 2019 21: 21
            You smoked something or what mushrooms overeat? You’re talking simply enchanting nonsense.
            1. 0
              9 August 2019 11: 46
              Didn't Marx, at the end of his life, renounce his teaching, realizing all its utopianism? His statement "I am no longer a Marxist" is very well known. The only trouble is that commies do not like to remember what is not beneficial to them.
              Any idea that is not supported financially is a project. Marx was supported by his friend Engels, who, unlike "the bearded Karla", did have capital;)
    7. 0
      30 July 2019 21: 57
      Quote: Less
      that to be called a communist and to be him are completely different things.

      Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin, Medvedev ....... are all former communists! And who will now believe the "komunyaks" as Navodvorskaya said!
      1. +2
        30 July 2019 22: 55
        Quote: fif21
        as Navodvorskaya said!

        We found someone to remember by night)))))
    8. -1
      31 July 2019 13: 10
      Unfortunately, the Communist Party now has little in common with the real Communists!
      so basically just the edra department! But this does not in any way cast a shadow over the real Communists!
    9. 0
      1 August 2019 05: 19
      Grandpa Sue is a perfect steam line whistle. The Communists of the thirties were all on the shoulder, and the Communists of the 90s, ladies will be waist-deep;)
  2. +11
    29 July 2019 15: 11
    in Russia, strong parties with a powerful ideological platform .... virtually none.

    Which is very sad.
    1. +6
      29 July 2019 15: 37
      There are no strong political parties, but various rabble in bulk. And here the position of the authorities is not clear, the authorities must defend themselves, but here they run around with "chewy-blacid" rags ..
      Kami and no one does anything. Try to run in Ukraine with the Russian flag, rot in the dungeons of the SBU.
    2. +4
      29 July 2019 20: 05
      It is sad that people in power are mowing any ideology other than cutting dough!
      1. -1
        30 July 2019 00: 06
        Quote: Campanella
        It is sad that people in power are mowing any ideology other than cutting dough!

        And in the past with party cards ... request
        1. 0
          30 July 2019 15: 47
          And in the even more past, we were all monkeys ...
          1. +2
            30 July 2019 20: 27
            Quote: Campanella
            And in the even more past, we were all monkeys ...

            I am sorry for you ... feel
    3. -1
      30 July 2019 16: 07
      Ideology is dangerous for our powers that be, because it implies equality (before ideology). And they want to "panuvat", to be the highest caste, so that no one is a decree to them. The Communist Party was the last structure based on ideology, but it was discredited completely and completely.
  3. +17
    29 July 2019 15: 13
    The Communist Party itself has been discredited. Rather, it is not so much she as her local leaders. And first of all - Zyuganov himself. Power has eclipsed the mind. They are really ready to unite with anyone, if only to get to the feeding trough. Politics, such a policy.
    And the top of the Communist Party wants a feeding trough. In principle, it is no different from EP.
    Where are those communists, with warm hearts, who in the 20s of the last century believed in a bright future? They are simply not there. In the manual - that's for sure.
    And, most importantly, I will not tire of repeating this - their ideology is completely blurred. There is no clear understanding of what, where, why, and why.
    And without ideology, there are no victories.
    1. +6
      29 July 2019 15: 22
      And, most importantly, I will not tire of repeating this - their ideology is completely blurred. There is no clear understanding of what, where, why, and why.
      And without ideology, there are no victories.
      It’s not just blurred, it’s flooded and bitten, in the company with such
      1. +2
        29 July 2019 15: 44
        It’s not just blurred, it’s flooded and bitten, in the company with such

        And do not understand who gogo discredits.
        1. +7
          29 July 2019 15: 58
          Quote: BARKAS
          do not understand who is discrediting whom.

          Apparently, mutual group discredit, a sort of political sin total. fellow Here, after all, Gena’s grandfather is a gray hair in a beard, a mat in his rib. wassat
          1. +3
            29 July 2019 16: 40
            Quote: Paranoid50
            gray hair in a beard, a kovtun in a rib

            Crucian beard wink
        2. +5
          29 July 2019 16: 31
          Quote: BARKAS
          It’s not just blurred, it’s flooded and bitten, in the company with such

          And do not understand who gogo discredits.

          There is not any discredit here. They are all characters in a talk show called democracy and freedom of speech. We will not see real and significant oppositionists, only clowns and self-compromising personalities are profitable for the authorities, so that they can be exposed in a flattering light at any time. What elections can we talk about here? Between whom and what to choose here?
    2. -3
      29 July 2019 16: 54
      Quote: Honest Citizen

      Where are those communists, with warm hearts, who in the 20s of the last century believed in a bright future?

      Extinct, comrade. Stalin took care. Unlike these dreamers, Stalin was a realist, and with them he was "out of the way."
      Quote: Honest Citizen
      And, most importantly, I will not tire of repeating this - their ideology is completely blurred.

      Ideology began to erode immediately after Lenin's death, and after the dissolution of the Comintern, in 1943, in general, the whole idea of ​​the "World Revolution" went "out of hand". And the idea of ​​"two", and later "three" worlds consolidated the process, and by its decline, in 1991, the CPSU came up with what the Communist Party is now. So the process is natural, and, I hope, irreversible .... Although, in 1945. we also thought that Nazism was over, but no, how devils jumped out of the box, these ghouls, even where they "frolicked" ...
      1. -1
        29 July 2019 22: 27
        Quote: EwgenyZ
        Ideology began to erode immediately after the death of Lenin

        ideology may change.
        Until 1953 we were imperials, we lived like bandaged twigs, more and more each for himself, until the center became weak and inadequate, from which everyone fled with the support of the center itself.
    3. +3
      29 July 2019 20: 06
      Wait come!
    4. 0
      29 July 2019 23: 12
      Quote: Honest Citizen
      who in the 20 of the last century believed in a brighter future? They are simply not there.
      -It already then decreased greatly ...
      Watch the pre-war films (Volga-Volga, etc.) - there the leader is always a bureaucrat, mediocrity and pest. And then remember where then (and after) these leaders came from and who appointed them ...
    5. 0
      9 August 2019 11: 49
      A curious question: what are these loafers still doing in the State Duma? Traded in places, but party cottages in Bullfinches seize? As for me - they need to be driven by a filthy broom. Fully self-discredited degenerates, sir!
  4. +5
    29 July 2019 15: 19
    ABOUT! ABOUT! Marxist esotericism and Leninist magic ... Well this is wonderful! fellow
    And Emma Rayman .. UBV. wassat love
  5. +2
    29 July 2019 15: 21
    Oh, the Communist Party, the Communist Party, at least after Voronenkov wash yourself.
    1. +2
      29 July 2019 15: 34
      Domestic policies worry a lot more than a single party. Which, in principle, does not solve anything.
      1. 0
        9 August 2019 11: 53
        If the party does not decide anything, why does it sit in the State Duma and eat up the taxpayer budget? Conscience isn’t enough to leave, or are you so stuck to the feeder with your mandibles, what has convulsed?
    2. +1
      29 July 2019 20: 06
      And who are you for?
  6. +12
    29 July 2019 15: 24
    Why did the author say about shamans, if it has long been clear in the Communist Party there are no communists
    1. Underwater hunter
      +5
      29 July 2019 16: 51
      Quote: Gardamir
      Why did the author say about shamans, if it has long been clear in the Communist Party there are no communists

      In order to denigrate the idea itself .. it’s obvious .. But this idea is far ahead of time and I’m sure we will return to it with new creative force .. Although a lot of the article, unfortunately, has a place to be.
      1. +4
        29 July 2019 18: 09
        new creative power.
        only it should be a truly new force with new ideas. And then the idea of ​​a market with a human face led to the creation of the Russian federal monarchy. So the desire to revive the Union will lead to the theater of the absurd.
        1. Underwater hunter
          +3
          29 July 2019 19: 06
          Quote: Gardamir
          So the desire to revive the Union will lead to the theater of the absurd.

          Personally, I have nothing against the Union, I am against freeloaders, who will at our expense depict the socialist system, and in fact be a feudal state .. For this reason, the Union is future development (not mandatory). The main thing is to put things in order and build the right relationships in your home, and when it is good in your home, then there will be many people who want to join the Union, and there you will already see who they will unite with and who not.
          1. +2
            29 July 2019 19: 48
            Personally, I have nothing against the Union, I am against freeloaders who will represent the socialist system at our expense,
            From word to word you expressed my thoughts.
    2. -2
      2 August 2019 13: 18
      Oh, how, Gardamir began to change his shoes. But what about the "best world-class APG"? You went for him here on the foam? Did you share the money?
      1. -1
        2 August 2019 15: 24
        What about
        First, Grudinin came from the Communist Party, but not a Communist. He voted for him, if only because he offered at least something, unlike the one that did not go out to the people. Or would you like to vote for the president’s goddaughter?
  7. 3vs
    +6
    29 July 2019 15: 30
    "Is this a malicious discrediting of the party, which for almost 30 years has been a powerful competitor to all its opponents - from the ruling circles to the systemic opposition?"
    This party itself, in the words of Vitali Klitschko, painted itself in those colors in which it painted itself,
    draining the referendum on pension "reform"!
    In this way, the top of this party showed whom she defends ...
    1. 0
      29 July 2019 20: 10
      What do you mean leaked? Putin and his little spies did not allow to be held. And here the Communist Party since the time of the superintendent Yeltsin did not give people the right to a referendum.
      1. 3vs
        +1
        29 July 2019 20: 26
        Pamfilova proposed changing the wording of the referendum so that there is an unambiguous interpretation.
        And what, where did the fighters for worker-peasant happiness go?
        The mandates in the Duma are closer to the body ...
        1. +3
          29 July 2019 20: 54
          Well, yes, casuistry began there. Put a comma and the meaning is perverted.
      2. +3
        29 July 2019 23: 14
        Quote: Campanella
        And here the Communist Party since the time of the superintendent Yeltsin did not give people the right to a referendum.
        -Go, only in the 2 and 3 DG the Communists had a pretty decent majority. And what?
  8. +8
    29 July 2019 15: 31
    The problem of modern communists is that they ceased to be them. Turning into ordinary social democrats.
    1. +4
      29 July 2019 20: 12
      You can call anyone. Moreover, communism is an idea not yet realized by anyone.
  9. +12
    29 July 2019 15: 32
    A natural question arises: what is happening inside the Communist Party?
    ... Yes, there is no nut inside, one rot ... and for a long time ... Especially since the moment when Zu knocked on the door of the Socialist Republic with a cry, I’m my bourgeois, open ... Communist Party now, there’s nothing political brand behind it .. Then a rumor passed, Zyu decided to transfer the party to his grandson by inheritance, so the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is not only a brand, but also an LLC ... There is no one to vote at the parliamentary ... One scam ...
    1. +2
      29 July 2019 15: 37
      Quote: parusnik
      Communist Party of the Russian Federation not only a brand, but also LLC

      This is classified information ...
      1. 0
        9 August 2019 11: 54
        rather, ZAO
  10. 0
    29 July 2019 15: 34
    Quote: Honest Citizen
    The Communist Party itself has been discredited. Rather, it is not so much she as her local leaders. And first of all - Zyuganov himself. Power has eclipsed the mind. They are really ready to unite with anyone, if only to get to the feeding trough. Politics, such a policy.
    And the top of the Communist Party wants a feeding trough. In principle, it is no different from EP.
    Where are those communists, with warm hearts, who in the 20s of the last century believed in a bright future? They are simply not there. In the manual - that's for sure.
    And, most importantly, I will not tire of repeating this - their ideology is completely blurred. There is no clear understanding of what, where, why, and why.
    And without ideology, there are no victories.

    They are all in power with warm hearts defending a new ideology, they earn!
  11. +5
    29 July 2019 15: 34
    During his tenure, the whole country was angry with the permanent General Secretary of the CPSU - "dear Leonid Ilyich," Zyuganov has been heading the Communist Party of the Russian Federation for longer than Brezhnev. And nothing ... nothing new is said, Lenin's behests about the party - the vanguard, the active nucleus, etc. forgotten completely. And comrade. Zyuganov no longer causes anything but irritation ... And new faces are not to be seen. Zhirinovsky in the Liberal Democratic Party, also has his party on his shoulders, so at least he is charismatic ...
    1. +4
      29 July 2019 20: 14
      Zhirinovsky? The clown is cheap. I’m waiting for him to start washing his boots in the Indian Ocean. And every woman for a man or vice versa ...
      1. +3
        29 July 2019 22: 58
        Quote: Campanella
        Zhirinovsky? The clown is cheap.

        This is cheap for us.
        1. +2
          29 July 2019 23: 00
          I mean, as a politician.
          All this ruling shobla is very expensive for the people.
      2. 0
        9 August 2019 11: 56
        This one does not particularly hide that his party is just a business. The Communist Party of the Russian Federation, headed by Zyuganov, makes a "girl" out of itself, doing exactly the same thing.
  12. +3
    29 July 2019 15: 35
    After Zyuganov "leaked" the won elections in 1996, his authority, like the authority of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, is equal to 0 (zero). But grandfather Zyu still dreams of the Kremlin wall. Otherwise I would have retired long ago and left the Communist Party young. Then she would have a real chance.
    1. +1
      29 July 2019 20: 16
      Have you seen the real results of the vote? Or did you have to unleash your civil war?
      1. +3
        29 July 2019 22: 33
        Every party is only worth something if it can defend itself. And in 1996, the Communist Party merged as a party.
        1. -2
          29 July 2019 22: 42
          And if not by cliches, even by great ones, but by real facts?
          Do not forget now is not the beginning of the 20th century. And many moves of that time do not roll. Every fruit must ripen.
          1. 0
            29 July 2019 22: 47
            Quote: Campanella
            Every fruit must ripen.

            Or rot.
            Quote: Campanella
            but with real facts
            And in 1996, the Communist Party merged as a party. Is a real fact.
            1. -2
              29 July 2019 22: 57
              Not a fact, but Kremlin propaganda. The Kremlin has spread rot since the days of Yelkin.
      2. +2
        29 July 2019 23: 00
        Quote: Campanella
        Have you seen the real results of the vote? Or did you have to unleash your civil war?

        Yes, yes we remember. Russia has exhausted the limit of revolutions. But communism itself will fall on us from heaven.
        1. 0
          29 July 2019 23: 42
          Russia has not exhausted anything. This is a talking room, but there’s no point in running into it either. This is not only a matter of Russia, and this must also be taken into account. It is important to save Russia and make it prosperous. I understand these words, but they should become the meaning of state policy, and not the rhetoric of power populists. The Russian president says a lot of right words, but only words, and his deeds are very strange.
          1. -2
            31 July 2019 21: 27
            Quote: Campanella
            It is important to save Russia and make it prosperous.

            Yeah, and for this, rally around the yacht. laughing
  13. +1
    29 July 2019 15: 36
    In order for something to be born, something must die.
    The agony of the CPSU in the form of the Communist Party was a little delayed.
    And not because of the struggle for the life of the party itself, but because of the desire of those in power to create the appearance of opposition and criticism among the people.
    Only all this "HPP" has long been seen through.
    Zyuganov, Zhirinovsky and Mironov, who joined them, are extras in vaudeville, "on a salary."
    So far, the formation and concentration of truly healthy forces has not been observed.
    And the shaman is great.
    I think he saved a lot of money to the budget of the Russian Federation, having independently, at his own expense, reached the well-known medical psychiatric centers in Russia.

    And here is what this Emma said -
    Esoterics is based on the knowledge of our ancestors. This knowledge lies in observing nature, the animal world, the human world, the stars. There is a huge storehouse of knowledge! We cannot make any discoveries in science if we rely solely on classical science, on what is known today. Pay attention that all known serious figures, scientists made their discoveries at the junction of the rational and the irrational. One way or another, they were all connected either with religion or practiced ancient cults. ”
    absolutely right.
    We can also add that in the immediate environment of the GDP there are also isoterics.
    The question is - where do I know this from, it’s not worth asking.
    I know that.
    1. +5
      29 July 2019 16: 26
      "People are boats.
      Although on land.
      You live
      his
      till,
      all sorts of
      dirty seashells
      sticks
      us
      on the sides.
      And then,
      breaking through
      the storm is angry
      sit down
      so that the sun is near
      and clean off
      algae
      green beard
      and jellyfish raspberry mucus.
      Я
      yourself
      under Lenin I clean "V. Mayakovsky-Poem Vladimir -Ilyich-Lenin ----.
      Quote: demo
      all kinds of shells and green mucus ...-- a shaman is great.
      I think he saved a lot of money to the budget of the Russian Federation, having independently, at his own expense, reached the well-known medical psychiatric centers in Russia.

      And here is what this Emma said -
    2. -1
      29 July 2019 20: 18
      Yes you are a philosopher! What is not surrounded by the pharaohs ...
  14. +10
    29 July 2019 15: 37
    But in 2018, when the party very controversially nominated Pavel Grudinin as a candidate, the Communist Party spokesman barely overcame the threshold of 10% of the vote


    But how could he gain more if the king demanded 76 for himself?
    1. -3
      29 July 2019 16: 34
      how could he score more if the king demanded 76 for himself?

      Even so, he could have scored 24 and that would have been something.
      In general, if you think so, there is nothing to stand for president.
    2. +2
      29 July 2019 20: 20
      The king began to play a point from the director of the collective farm. The debate got scared like a kid.
  15. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      29 July 2019 20: 21
      The Secretary General of the capitalist Russian party will bring the country to a new revolution, this is obvious.
  16. 0
    29 July 2019 15: 52
    Ha, as I wrote about Voronenkov, it’s immediately a minus, it is clear now who the Communist Party adherents are, in Soviet times the phrase at the party meeting “party card on the table”, for many bosses, not only their careers, but their lives ended
    1. +5
      29 July 2019 17: 11
      Quote: Ravil_Asnafovich
      the phrase at the party meeting "party card on the table", for many bosses, not only their careers, but also their lives ended.

      Yes, less was enough - a critical publication in Pravda already threatened with serious troubles
    2. +2
      29 July 2019 18: 16
      Not always like this.
      Sometimes, and so - Going into battle, please consider me a communist.
      And life could only begin.
      More often than not.
      Due to the fact that the man did not survive this battle.
    3. 0
      29 July 2019 20: 23
      Do you want a plus sign? Then write about the thieves and rogues of the core.
    4. +1
      29 July 2019 21: 29
      The minus for Voronenkov is correct, because the Communist Party of the Voronenkovs has no more than a dozen, and the Edinorosov’s - almost everything turns out that you noticed a straw in the eye of the Communist Party, and you don’t notice the logs in the eyes of edros.
  17. -1
    29 July 2019 16: 02
    Quote: Greg Miller
    it is the only real party today whose program is aimed at developing the country, and not at its final destruction

    not a single program has fed a single hungry
    1. +5
      29 July 2019 18: 23
      Without details.
      He arrived in Moscow in the 2012 year.
      With the recommendations of a very respected man Zyuganov and Vidmanov.
      He brought an offer for the PRC.
      But so that Gennady Andreevich introduced it to his Chinese members of the same party (related parties).
      We divide the income in half.
      Amounts are serious.
      He says.
      And where to invest money in Russia?
      I tell him.
      Create collective farms, state farms.
      Pay people decent money.
      Build schools, technical schools.
      Train.
      And everywhere, on each pillar write - This is created by the Communist Party for the people of Russia.
      He looked at me thoughtfully and rivers - now there is no time. Duma elections on the nose. And then the presidential election.
      Come later.
      After all.
      Well, I told him everything that I think about the Communist Party, and about him personally.
      I was not shy in expressions.
      1. -2
        29 July 2019 20: 27
        What did Zyuganov say so?
        1. 0
          29 July 2019 21: 10
          And what could not?
          What raised your question?
          1. -1
            29 July 2019 22: 11
            Did you specifically talk with Zyuganov?
            1. +1
              30 July 2019 06: 03
              Without interrogation, okay?
              Yes, with Gennady Andreyevich and Viktor Mikhailovich.
              In the office of the latter in the Moscow Zoo area (I don’t remember the street anymore).
              Enough questions.
              1. -1
                30 July 2019 10: 47
                And where is the interrogation? Just clarifying the information. To be honest, Zyuganov’s understanding is that elections are more important than fact. Although, it’s because the state allocates money to the parties that passed in the State Duma.
                As for the initiatives of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, in my opinion, one could also do more in terms of developing an alternative socialist economy.
                The only question is that the government is really spreading all possible threats to its existence.
  18. +3
    29 July 2019 16: 06
    the Communist Party really disgraced itself and did it many times, but not with this tinsel in the form of strange behavior. The main shame is the complete drain of voters' expectations. Instead of real social achievements, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation offers virtual programs, real meetings with virtual results and hints that "our cause is right." But one should not confuse the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its party members. There are those who want to do something and naively think that the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will allow them.
    1. +3
      29 July 2019 16: 36
      , but not this tinsel in the form of strange behavior. The main shame is the complete discharge of voters' expectations.

      Both in that and in the third.
      There are those who want to do something and naively think that the Communist Party will allow them to.

      Well, that’s already happened in history, and there’s a cure — in Stalin’s terms — for cleaning or for Lenin’s demarcation.
    2. +4
      29 July 2019 17: 46
      All this is sad. Although the secret winds moving the ship named Russia, I, like everyone present on VO, are unknown to us, although the TV screens sometimes entertain us, sometimes brag, sometimes show another material about the president like "Ilyich with children" but intuitively embraces a feeling of anxiety. Sometimes it seems, but is he in his mind, or the constant attacks of opponents have done their insidious deed and the once major politician has turned into a kind grandfather. What can we hope for - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, but it took the path of compromise and Zyuganov's thick bass no longer even surprises anyone. In the spring, Platoshkin spoke with a completely logical economic program, it seemed that now he would run for president, but nothing has been heard about him either. It looks like parliamentary methods of peaceful correction have been cut off. The demshiza has revived, not hesitating to declare that they need to stay in the Moscow City Duma in order to master the cash flows for their revenge. and behind them there is already a shadow of a hegemon and European hegemonics who do not hesitate to get into our affairs, they are already proposing to calculate OMON fighters in order to lustrate according to the Ukrainian scenario. What to do is not clear ..
      1. +3
        29 July 2019 20: 32
        The question can be solved only from above. But there, apparently, they consider that it is so good.
        In this scenario, only riot as a result. And no one will have power ghouls, people will not feel good from this, just ghouls will be replaced.
  19. +2
    29 July 2019 16: 16
    The current Communist Party, this is the same United Russia, only with a sickle and a hammer. They can safely be united.
    1. HAM
      +4
      29 July 2019 16: 51
      They do not even need to unite, because they are one and the same ... "convinced communists" famously renamed themselves "United Russia", almost everyone in the United Russia had party membership cards.
      1. +1
        29 July 2019 21: 34
        Well, the old members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation can at least be respected for the fact that they did not "change their shoes in a jump" and did not throw out their membership cards, like the others.
    2. 0
      29 July 2019 22: 54
      Quote: Malkavianin
      They can safely be united.

      How then to distinguish money from the money of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation?
  20. 0
    29 July 2019 16: 26
    On a single voting day on September 8, 2019, election campaigns of various levels will be held in the Russian Federation. Someone doubts about the already almost chosen protégés?
  21. +2
    29 July 2019 16: 28
    What is wrong with the communists? - Yes, everything is wrong! Starting with the name and ending with ideology.
    In general, the modern Communist Party is a strange construct, in an incomprehensible way mixed up the shabby dogmas of Marxism-Leninism with theism and bourgeois political economy of the Social Democrats.
    In general, observing the activities of the so-called. "left opposition", the image of a preparatory group of a kindergarten with red flags, under the supervision of a strict teacher, who, during a game of "elections", punished the naughty ones: "... Go to sleep, naughty children. There will be no sweets today!"
  22. +2
    29 July 2019 16: 57
    Here you read the characteristics of such candidates and, inevitably with sadness, you remember the Soviet power, personnel selection through educational institutions, enterprises, etc., a sieve of mountains and other comas, as well as compulsory treatment from psychiatry. nowadays in politics in the course of the play there are more and more patients of mental hospitals. Then I remembered that in 2016 there was also some kind of mess with the elections, Oleshenka-sisyan really resisted there, so in Norilsk the main leader from his community was, or rather was a person who was very popular on LGBT sites, especially in the BDSM section. By the way, when people found out who was leading them into battle, who was tied under the "red" banner, the whole action burst before being born. "This is what the life-giving cross does" (c) or competent presentation of the material. "So you write, you write, you will be credited" (c)
  23. +5
    29 July 2019 17: 16
    And I like the parapsychologist. Not as a communist, but as a woman. She would have a leather jacket and a Mauser ...
  24. 0
    29 July 2019 17: 21
    Multiparty system?
  25. +5
    29 July 2019 17: 30
    "Yes, there were people in our time .... Heroes! Not you!" It's time to rename the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, so as not to dishonor the good name of the ancestors.
  26. +5
    29 July 2019 17: 50
    Zyuganov, like Putin, are not allowed to be independent and sensible. Therefore, there is no alternative to them.
  27. +5
    29 July 2019 17: 52
    and what does the Communist Party have to communism or the communist idea? and I can also be called a multi-billionaire, doesn’t that mean that I am ...?
    1. +2
      29 July 2019 18: 02
      it has no one except the name. What lives
  28. +8
    29 July 2019 17: 56
    A couple of years ago I was a member of the Communist Party. However, the look from the inside really disappointed me and I went out. There is% 10 left from the party and every year less and less, as old cadres are replaced by different crooks.
    By the way, the acceptance there of any "esotericists" only confirms what I have written
  29. +5
    29 July 2019 18: 01
    Quote: Malkavianin
    The current Communist Party, this is the same United Russia, only with a sickle and a hammer. They can safely unite

    All current parties, this is United Russia. All participants in one project. Representative democracy
  30. +7
    29 July 2019 18: 03
    KMK, the current top of the Communist Party, is fully integrated into the system. And they are comfortable and well in it. There is some kind of power and influence. So the money. And you go further - with a high degree of probability they will take away everything at all. Well, if you do not go to jail.
    So far, we have no second Lenin or Stalin, who were imprisoned for their idea, both in exile and in exile and in prison ...
    That is why these leaders are popular among the people, because they fought FOR THE IDEA, and not for the next "yard" with %% to kill or the next "fish" on the yacht to tear off ...

    I am a small party from the regional branch of Moscow. And what I see - we are trying to do something below. But from above, all initiatives are completely suppressed. Help is not provided, etc.

    How the past municipal elections went is horrible. Everyone was on his own. At my own expense. As a result, the elections are complete. Proy center, which did not help in the field. Neither the organization, nor the observers, nor the agitation materials, nor the rental of halls for agitation, in general, nothing. Who could afford - did everything at his own expense. But EdR had an organization.
    Conclusion - the Communist Party was not able to nominate its candidate for mayoral election, because could not pass the municipal filter of 110 people.
    Further. For the mayor's elections, "primaries" were held in the Communist Party of Moscow. Shuvalova won. And the Central Committee appointed Kumin the winner. Who is a pupil of Chubais. But the rich ...
    And EdRo agreed and helped with the passage of the municipal filter.

    Draw your own conclusions. I do mine. I don’t make any decisions yet ... I’m waiting. I hope .. But less and less of this hope.
    And we have quite a lot of young people.
    However, for the most part, they came because it is just fun, because it is a protest, and young people always want to protest, this is normal. They are not ideological. And the way work is being done with this youth does not make me happy at all. They are not given development in the right, ideological way. They are just given to catch hype ..
    1. +1
      29 July 2019 20: 41
      The CPSU also behaved in the last years of Soviet power ...
  31. 0
    29 July 2019 18: 10
    in the same St. Petersburg, citizen Emma Rayman is running for municipal deputies from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation

    SHISDETS belay


    what is the next step? !!!
    Berkova ?!
    1. +1
      29 July 2019 19: 05
      Better is Berkova - at least everything is in order with her head.
      1. 0
        29 July 2019 21: 15
        I think this is the same, so many idiots to cover it need to have good brains
  32. +9
    29 July 2019 18: 35
    The author of this opus himself demonstrates shamanistic thinking, it seems that he lives in some kind of parallel reality. However, if you look closely in his verbal chaos, you can catch a very specific thought - the Communist Party of the Russian Federation cannot oppose citizen Putin and the policy of the oligarchic authorities of the Russian Federation and you cannot be at least a little "non-systemic". This, in fact, is the meaning or, more precisely, the order of this article.
    Essentially the same
    1) the Communist Party and was created in 1993 within the system of the oligarchic regime of the bourgeois dictatorship of Yeltsin-Putin to imitate "opposition" from those who are "for the USSR, for social justice." Just like the LDPR imitates opposition from those who are "for the Russians, for the poor."
    2) The oligarchic regime of the Russian Federation broke through the Soviet legacy (on which "liberal patriots" like Putin parasitize) began to experience tremendous pressure from the first capitalist world, the collective West, which quite reasonably strives to end the transformation of the post-Soviet republics into countries of the third world, control over which belongs "world hegemon." The regime of Vekselberg and Chubais agrees to be a junior partner and send yasak to the master in the West, but does not agree to give up control over the territory of the former RSFSR. This is Putin's "patriotism". The main enemy for the regime in this case is not the dying out and not organized Russian people, and not the lured Communist Party of the Russian Federation, but the "terrible Maidan", that is, the Western partners and their clientele. The main task of the "communists" and other "systemic" parties is to work for the "patriot" Putin. Anything that deviates from this task is interpreted as "betrayal of Russia", then betrayal of the interests of the ruling mafia and is punishable by inadmissibility of money, creation of spoilers (such as the Communists of Russia ) or simply persecution - as in the case of Grudinin, who did not play the role of a parsley clown well enough in the elections and allowed himself the terrible thing to say at least a few words of truth about the current situation in Russia.
  33. +4
    29 July 2019 18: 35
    So inglorious to merge Grudinin ... it was necessary to try ...
    As a result, as many had predicted: Pavel Nikolayevich was left in shit, publicly shaving his mustache, and even made a lot of problems for himself and the state farm. And Gennady Andreevich and his comrades spend time in the State Duma at ease, occasionally defiling with portraits of Stalin and on duty blowing up their cheeks, upon invitation to a TV show on central channels. Against this background, even the muddy Suraykin looks decent ...
    1. -1
      29 July 2019 19: 14
      Grudinin is the same privatizer and optimizer as everyone in big business, and it was not worth and is not worth waiting for some miracles from his presidency in the field of economics and other things. Only fools believe in miracles.
      1. +6
        29 July 2019 21: 43
        But what idiots have believed in Putin for 20 years? Permanent power should not be, this is an axiom. Therefore, Putin will sit for a quarter of a century on the throne and that's enough, everything is clear to him with me, nothing shines from him for us. Therefore, we must give a try to guide the other king that we are losing, nothing. But at least a chance would appear. This quarter-century people get tired of the full.
        1. -1
          30 July 2019 13: 41
          Putin did not promise miracles - and we’ll live with these slogans right now.
        2. -1
          31 July 2019 16: 39
          I would correct about the "irremovability" of power. Irremovability for 20 years is great, BUT UNDER the CONDITION that all these 20 years have been used to implement a well-thought-out program of sustainable development, if in 20 years the welfare of the village pensioner and the demography of the indigenous population are positive. The point is not in "irreplaceability", but in 20 years of IDB and robbery of the population.
      2. 0
        29 July 2019 23: 02
        Quote: Vadim237
        expect miracles from his presidency,

        It would be a miracle if the authorities simply scratched themselves, and that’s good.
        Quote: Vadim237
        Only fools believe in miracles.
        Then it's about me, I believe this nonsense in Russia can not be eternal
    2. +3
      29 July 2019 19: 15
      There is no real leader. but Grudinin is not an option. He is unpleasant to the people (the majority). You need to just see it and not try to push up. It's useless.
      1. -3
        29 July 2019 20: 07
        Avon like you ... to most! laughing Who considered this majority?
        1. +1
          29 July 2019 23: 24
          Quote: Klaus
          Avon like you ... to most! laughing Who considered this majority?
          -the village voted against him ... in the village of such organizers: SPK-OAO-ZAO- everyone was left with nothing (and he has 95% of the shares) had seen enough in 90 ...
          the city - yes, he voted - how does he live nearby, greets the pen (sometimes) ... children's naivety
          1. +1
            30 July 2019 11: 23
            When burning tears pour down the village, I have no regrets. I still remember how in the small homeland, the former collective farmers lined up to sell their shares faster to the visiting tourists from Moscow. They sold it. We bought sofas and buckets with bolts ... And a year later, our millionaire collective farm was simply sold out, the herd was cut out, even the iron was removed from the farms ... Therefore, we must clearly understand that it was not stolen and taken away from them, but they missed . But bought sofas and shitty Zhiguli)))
            1. +1
              30 July 2019 15: 06
              Quote: Klaus
              When burning tears pour down the village, I have no regrets. I still remember how in the small homeland, the former collective farmers lined up to sell their shares faster to the visiting tourists from Moscow. They sold it. We bought sofas and buckets with bolts ... And a year later, our millionaire collective farm was simply sold out, the herd was cut out, even the iron was removed from the farms ... Therefore, we must clearly understand that it was not stolen and taken away from them, but they missed . But bought sofas and shitty Zhiguli)))

              Ah, well done, Herr Klaus. We had to observe a similar situation in the 90's and in our area. Then everyone wanted everything at once, but here in the ground, you understand, you have to pick your finger ...
      2. -2
        29 July 2019 20: 37
        And who is that option? Well, tell me? Volodin, Sobyanin?
        1. +3
          29 July 2019 21: 50
          And who is that option?

          And who knew Putin before he was famous, a former lieutenant colonel who carried a briefcase for Sobchak? He was also a dark horse, but Yeltsin bet on him and he won. And now, Putin will bet on another "friend" who will keep the power of the oligarchs. Do we need it?
          But Grudinin even managed something, he knows how to manage the collective farm successfully.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. 0
              29 July 2019 22: 04
              It was Yeltsin, since Putin, by his very first decree, thanked the old man, providing him with judicial inviolability.
              And the "mistake" about Grudinin is not critical, since he is clearly not a "storyteller" and knows how to lead at least something, and this is the main thing.
              1. 0
                30 July 2019 12: 09
                And Misha Prokhorov, too, knew how to manage — over there, what kind of manager was, he bought apartments for workers. And where is this brilliant leader now, where is his company successfully developing? He got in the right direction and time, and when it ended, he lives his piggy bank. Grudinin is also not from 0 full beginnings.
                1. 0
                  30 July 2019 15: 08
                  Quote: Siberian
                  And Misha Prokhorov, too, knew how to manage — over there, what kind of manager was, he bought apartments for workers.

                  Together with Madame Golodets, the Norilsk Nickel pension fund for 2 billion was stolen and nothing. request
          2. +4
            29 July 2019 22: 30
            That Yeltsin, that Putin are hypocritical small people, not state people random.
            1. -1
              30 July 2019 13: 44
              Putin is far from petty, farooooooo.
        2. 0
          29 July 2019 23: 06
          Yuri Boldyrev, Dmitrieva Oksana Genrikhovna, now Poklonskaya has been added.
          1. +1
            29 July 2019 23: 51
            Well, you can add a lot of decent people to the list. We are talking about those who can really take the presidency. And there are simply no such in our "independent and democratic" elections. We are waiting for whom Putin will put the reign, that's all!
            1. +1
              31 July 2019 16: 43
              A president without a political party is an empty shell. Even if he is decent, respectable. There is no "party of socialism" in the country at all. Oil painting.
        3. 0
          30 July 2019 00: 28
          Quote: Campanella
          Volodin, Sobyanin?

          Chur me! stop
    3. 0
      29 July 2019 19: 39
      Suraykin? ))) Smiled!
  34. +1
    29 July 2019 19: 26
    By the way, on the website of the "Agency for Federal Investigations" there is an interesting material about the starving oppositionist Sobol https://old.flb.ru/info/61056.html, on the topic of who is hu. And so, if you dig it well, you can dig up something interesting. In general, as Bismarck rightly noted: "It is better not to know what and how sausage and politics are made from."
    1. -2
      29 July 2019 20: 17
      This "agency" is a network edition of the Top Secret newspaper ... scandals, intrigues, investigations ... :)
  35. +2
    29 July 2019 19: 44
    In my provincial view, this is not the case with the Communists today. I can’t imagine a millionaire communist. That's actually all that I think is wrong with the guys ...
    Well, Comrade Lenin was not a millionaire, Comrade Stalin was not a millionaire as far as I know, Comrade Khrushchev is unlikely to be. Well, etc. on the list.
    1. +2
      29 July 2019 19: 55
      Why ... Marx was poor, but Engels was a very wealthy man. However, like Ulyanov, too, not from a poor family. Anyway, I don’t remember something poor communists, neither now nor now. Proof of this is Un's cheeks, which are visible from the back :)
      1. 0
        29 July 2019 20: 05
        Oh, right now we’ll get into the wilds ... As far as I know, our secretaries and their families did not own factories, plants, ships or other shipyards and drilling platforms, however.
        1. +2
          29 July 2019 20: 24
          It’s just me that, yes, Grudinin is a wealthy man, possibly a millionaire. And I do not use a negative connotation here, because, why would he not be rich? - He leads a very successful diversified enterprise, which anyone can see.
          1. +4
            30 July 2019 09: 12
            I agree. Grudinin was so "uncompetitive" that he did not leave the screens and the media before the elections, where he was flooded with dirt and compromising evidence. ERovtsam got scared
          2. 0
            31 July 2019 16: 47
            Many thanks to Grudinin just for saying the dreaded word "NATIONALIZATION" from the screen. The country heard. The bourgeois mass media quieted down, pretending "there was nothing." And a couple of days later began "Grudinin - bourgeois!", - shouted the servants of the owners of factories / newspapers / ships.
            1. 0
              31 July 2019 18: 30
              True. However, someone silently minus
    2. Underwater hunter
      +2
      29 July 2019 20: 14
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      Well, Comrade Lenin was not a millionaire, Comrade Stalin was not a millionaire as far as I know, Comrade Khrushchev is unlikely to be. Well, etc. on the list.

      Lenin was an aristocrat, Khrushchev was an underdeveloped traitor, and Stalin should generally stand apart from this company. For no one has done more for Russia. A millionaire is not a vice, especially when money is not only earned for itself, but also invested in the development of its employees and their families .. Look at what Grudinin built and show me a unicorn who has done something close for his employees and generally for the city.
      1. -6
        29 July 2019 20: 59
        Well, just right and an aristocrat ... Let's say that the king’s yon wanted to replace himself. It must be said and replaced.
        I am not familiar with Comrade Grudinin. Where did this character come from mnu, as the electorate did not know at all. What he built there for whom and on what conditions from Feodosia, not to be seen. Therefore, I do not discuss this person at all.
        Will this comrade manage the country ?! Big, big question. On Lenin-Stalin and even Brezhnev, he clearly does not pull.
        I could be wrong.
        1. Underwater hunter
          -2
          29 July 2019 21: 04
          Quote: Petrol cutter
          Well, just like an aristocrat ...

          Vladimir Lenin was also a nobleman. His father Ilya Nikolaevich Ulyanov served this very nobility. He worked in the field of enlightenment, received the rank of real state adviser, which corresponded to the military rank of major general, and at the same time - hereditary nobility, which extended to his children.

          By the way, the Lenin government of all Soviet governments is the most "aristocratic" - it was attended by most noblemen. The descendant of the old family was Vladimir Bonch-Bruevich, the heads of the Council of People's Commissars, the “white bones" were the people's commissar of education Anatoly Lunacharsky, the comrade-in-arms of Lenin, Alexander Kollontai. From the Polish gentry came the head of the Cheka “Iron Felix” Dzerzhinsky and his successor Vyacheslav Menzhinsky.
          Quote: Petrol cutter
          I am not familiar with Comrade Grudinin. Where did this character come from mnu, as the electorate did not know at all.

          That's too bad .. it would be nice to ask ..
          Quote: Petrol cutter
          Will this comrade manage the country ?! Big, big question. On Lenin-Stalin and even Brezhnev, he clearly does not pull.

          I am sure that he could .. and he is far from alone.
          Quote: Petrol cutter
          I could be wrong.

          We can all be wrong ..
    3. -1
      29 July 2019 23: 15
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      Stalin wasn’t a millionaire either

      V. S. Bushin: money for prizes was taken from the fees of I. V. Stalin for the publication of his works, including abroad.
      1. 16 Stalin Prizes (in the amount of 100 thousand rubles each) awarded annually to scientists and artists
      2. ten first (100 thousand rubles each), twenty second (50 thousand rubles each) and thirty third (25 thousand rubles each) Stalin prizes awarded annually for the best invention
      3.4 Stalin Prizes, 100 thousand rubles each, awarded annually for outstanding works in the field of literature
    4. 0
      29 July 2019 23: 16
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      . I can’t imagine a millionaire communist.

      In anticipation of the celebration of the 40th anniversary of the beginning of the reform and openness policy proclaimed by Deng Xiaoping, the People's Daily published a list of 100 people who made a special contribution to the development of China. In addition to party leaders, distinguished teachers, distinguished scholars and cultural figures, several billionaires are on the list: the founder of the Alibaba Group online sales platform Jack Ma (real name Ma Yun), the head of Tencent investment company Pony Ma (Ma Huaten), the founder of Baidu (Chinese Google equivalent) Robin Lee (Li Yanhong). At the same time, about the richest man in China, Jack Ma, whose fortune is estimated at $ 40 billion, it is said that he is a member of the Communist Party.
      laughing laughing laughing
      Quote: Petrol cutter
      Well, Comrade Lenin was not a millionaire, Comrade Stalin was not a millionaire as far as I know, Comrade Khrushchev is unlikely to be. Well, etc. on the list.

      And here the personality of the communist Jack Ma, who in the country has the status of a national hero, can be very useful. And it’s not at all because he is absurdly rich: on the contrary, in general, no one has ever heard of gold toilets or holidays with blackjack in connection with Ma Yun.
      What do we get for ideology and what kind of society? Firstly, we have the ideology of national development, right up to the highest peaks in the world. Secondly, we have before us the classical merit society: there is a lot to get who has a lot to do. This is a society where the key step to success is knowledge and education, which in addition give a person the necessary moral qualities. We will not forget the idea of ​​a society riddled with people's obligations to each other.
      And all together - this is a national value system that has been developed for centuries by Chinese civilizationstarting from Confucius.

      hi
  36. +1
    29 July 2019 19: 47
    "Beggars Citizens - Shame on the Government"

    Really - disgrace! How the Communist Party can come out with such a slogan ... it’s incomprehensible to the mind! It should be rewritten to: "Beggars citizens - the achievement of the government!"
    1. -5
      29 July 2019 20: 35
      "East Wind" electorate prepares for elections. How much is it interesting to this grieving about the CPRF slobber?
  37. +1
    29 July 2019 19: 47
    The author drowns for power. And along the way smears shit Communist Party.
    I read the comments of local gurus, all as one true connoisseurs of communism, with drafts on the monitor.
    1. 0
      31 July 2019 16: 52
      So I immediately noticed that the author "drowns for power", found "esotericists", and wipes the soles of them. The only fresh one is Ryman and the shaman. We already know the rest. And more - nothing intelligible.
  38. +2
    29 July 2019 19: 56
    The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is the same money-making office as the LDPR (they don’t even hide the fact that they will throw votes at the cash desk for everyone and for any reason paid). For me, the Communist Party died in 94-97 when they really could change the way of the country, but money and voila principles sideways, we vote according to the tickets paid. Well, then just a booth to the public without much desire for anything.
    1. +2
      29 July 2019 22: 26
      In reality, in 1991, did the result of the GKChP also change the situation?
  39. +1
    29 July 2019 19: 58
    It seems to me that there are no ideological communists in the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Some are opportunists.
    1. +3
      29 July 2019 20: 21
      Some are opportunists.

      And once for many communists, the biggest privilege was to go first into battle.
      1. +1
        29 July 2019 21: 03
        Yes. It was a deal. My grandfather was a communist. I got to Berlin.
        We have been elected deputy repeatedly. But now is not about that.
        1. +2
          29 July 2019 21: 41
          V.V.P. was a communist, came from Berlin, that's the way ...
          1. -1
            29 July 2019 23: 20
            he was getting ready to drive a car upon his return from Berlin, and he was given the chance to steer the state.
  40. +2
    29 July 2019 22: 08
    How much opium for the people?
  41. -1
    29 July 2019 22: 09
    Zyuganov in the Communist Party already pretty tired of everything. It gives the impression of a selfish, greedy for power, slow in making decisions of a person.
  42. +1
    30 July 2019 00: 00
    And what's the difference in our so-called. parliamentary parties? These are artificially created "departments" of the ordinary and uniform bureaucratic bureaucratic apparatus, called the Duma, created to imitate the democratic process, which are dependent on the state and "feed" from one hand. The interests of which people they represent is also not entirely clear, but judging by the way they jumped up with a standing ovation at the accidental appearance of some shabby senator from across the ocean (well, at least they didn’t fall on their knees), who apparently was looking for a toilet or a buffet , made a mistake with the door, it is clearly not this country, whose slaves are working for these boyars for a stew. They, i.e. this inherited estate, being supposedly a representative of the people, is inviolable to this people and is not subject to its jurisdiction, they do not bear any responsibility to their chosen ones for the decisions they make, are in no way connected with the region from which they imitated the elections and their well-being does not in any way depend on the state of affairs there, yes and often they just don't go there. And the most important thing is that those who allegedly chose them to represent and protect (he said obvious nonsense) cannot influence their "chosen ones" in any way. revoke their authority. The new nobleman is elected to another inherited estate forever, lives according to the laws of another state, has income and provision with absolutely nothing and is in no way tied to the income of the population, and he himself is in no way connected with this country and its interests. Like the Communist Party, like any so-called. the party is just an imitation of a single bureaucratic machine, they have already become fat and have long forgotten what the title of communist is and what it is. It is not for nothing that the Chinese and Koreans, like the Cubans, also consider us traitors and revisionists, which in fact is the case.
    1. 0
      30 July 2019 09: 23
      Good comment!
  43. 0
    30 July 2019 00: 17
    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    Quote: Underwater Hunter
    I agree. But within a year, I think one could find managers ..

    There - the question of a complete restart of the work of the government of the Russian Federation - in the existing structure, it is unable to manage nationalized enterprises. And here the question is not only in personalities, but also in responsibility, and in the methods of planning and control, in everything.
    All this can be done, but Grudinin does not say a word about it
    Quote: Underwater Hunter
    And where did they get them before? The USSR has always been under sanctions, with several new cities appearing annually ..

    Exactly where? :)))) First of all, in the USSR they understood that money is the blood of the economy and printed so much that it was enough for normal trade. And the price increase was impossible because of their planned nature. We have now the amount of funds in the economy is artificially underestimated so as not to create inflation, which, of course, extremely limits the possibility of domestic investment. There are ways out of this situation, but Grudinin has nothing to say about it.
    Quote: Underwater Hunter
    Only the nationalization of alcohol will give 8 trillion. rub we have all the alcohol now in private hands ..

    Yes, she will not give much, we have to tear excise taxes on producers, so they share their profit with the state more than fairly
    Quote: Underwater Hunter
    But the road will be overpowered by the traveler, the main thing is to choose the right direction.

    Therefore, I voted for Grudinin ...

    You do not remember the Soviet Union .... hi , You will "come back" in October 1917, well, and then, and so there is nothing that you are talking about and there was no trace - neither managers, nor finances, state structures were paralyzed, however winked nevertheless, they dealt with both devastation and illiteracy, homelessness, and with many seemingly unsolvable tasks, we created an army, intelligence (not the worst, by the way), and you say ... starting conditions ... finances ... lol It's just that people in those days were different, and did not look for comfortable, greenhouse conditions! As the poet said - "... to make nails out of these people ..."! That's it, my friend wink
  44. 0
    30 July 2019 00: 22
    Discrediting the Communist Party. What is wrong with modern communists?

    Yes, everything is wrong .... winked
  45. 0
    30 July 2019 00: 31
    As the proletariat, I can say that the trade unions actually occupy the place of the Communist Party, but they are all pocket and are not power. Having escaped from the people Zyuganov played in the supreme and this is the verdict of the party, slipped into show business.
  46. -1
    30 July 2019 01: 06
    Quote: Underwater Hunter
    But within a year, I think one could find managers ..

    It takes several university years to train some "engineer"! And you "decided to solve" the personnel problem in a year? Once a minister complained: We cannot find a specialist for the position of the head of the department ... there are people with a "specialized" education, but among them there is no one in which they would be sure that they would not steal! In general, as in that joke: "Krendets, we have arrived! Hello, girls!" ... Even if it is possible to find people with a suitable ("specialized") education, there is no certainty that they will not "secretly-actively" sabotage the restructuring of public administration, the reorganization of the economy!
  47. 0
    30 July 2019 01: 13
    Be that as it may, whatever they say - the Communist Party is the only real opposition.
    "I have no other opposition for you." (paraphrasing Stalin)
    So shit KPFR not bags tossing and turning. And you create your party with your program and send it to parliament, at least with 10% in the face of opposition from the authorities!
  48. 0
    30 July 2019 07: 31
    The communists who overthrew the king and the communists who destroyed the USSR are two big differences. Zyuganov from the latter, which confirms his concession to the presidency in the won elections. The communists went to hard labor, to be shot for workers. These in the Duma only pretend to be fighters that you think there is no better Grudinin among them, there are, but he would surely have thrown them from the feeder. Everything suits the modern komunyak why they need something to change and take risks for this, therefore they don’t come from any danger what the authorities say they will do, they are compromisers, degenerates.
    1. 0
      31 July 2019 16: 57
      The communists did not overthrow the tsar. More precisely, the RSDLPb did not overthrow the tsar. They wanted to, but could not. The tsar was overthrown by the bourgeoisie in February 1917, WITHOUT the participation of the Bolsheviks. For the overthrow of the monarchy and the "privatization" of Russia, including with the participation of "allies" in the Entente. for this (overthrow of the monarchs of Europe) and started PMA. I'm just in favor of calling a spade a spade, not getting in a heap, and not pulling the ears.
  49. -3
    30 July 2019 07: 41
    Quote: Underwater Hunter
    I hope that the communists / socialists will have a personality who will lead.

    Hopes of young men feed!
    1. -1
      30 July 2019 09: 32
      Quote: kalibr
      hopes of young men feed!

      but young men are not there .... Yes
  50. -2
    30 July 2019 07: 42
    request for opposition (normal) of course there is ..
    but it’s a lot of money ..
    who will give? both external and internal, such a vertical suits.
  51. 0
    30 July 2019 09: 12
    THERE IS SUCH A PARTY!!! A party of beer-in-beer lovers.... but what about beer lovers?
    How do they prove and show their reputation? What are their achievements?
    But there WAS a party, a nationwide one???
  52. -2
    30 July 2019 09: 30
    The flags of such pro-Western parties as "Yabloko", "Growth Party", as well as many rags of various liberal movements, according to tradition, swarming around Navalny or Yashin.

    And so the red flags of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation soared over the heads of this public, and the leader of the “communists” in that event was not just anyone, but Vladimir Bortko himself. The participation of a patriotic party in such an action already raises questions of political integrity. But the situation was aggravated by a group of young men waving flags... Ukraine and the European Uniona.

    The communists are good allies...
    Citizen Gabyshev himself calls himself a warrior shaman. The purpose of his travel in Soviet times would be of interest only psychiatric hospital staff.

    As Alexander approached Chita, he was first met by a candidate for the city duma from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation namesake AlAlexander Zhdanov. The communist not only greeted the warrior shaman, but also harnessed himself to his cart

    marginalization is blooming in full bloom..... there are no words.. belay
  53. -1
    30 July 2019 10: 49
    Quote: Malkavianin
    The current Communist Party, this is the same United Russia, only with a sickle and a hammer. They can safely be united.

    they have long united and are comfortably cutting a budget that could help us live, rather than them buying Mercedes and villas.
  54. +1
    30 July 2019 11: 01
    The Communist Party of the Russian Federation is no longer a party, but a kind of gathering of well-settled people: a well-fed life, no responsibility. God forbid you come to power somewhere (there were only deplorable examples). They are satisfied with min. percentages in the elections, what to be in the State Duma. The management has become bronzed and it will be possible to take them out of their offices only feet first. They will not allow any competition in the party; they will gnaw at anyone’s throat for their fat pieces.
  55. -1
    30 July 2019 12: 45
    The XNUMXth century English agnostic scientist Thomas Henry Huxley said: “All truth is born as heresy and dies as superstition.” I would say differently here: Any movement is created by geniuses and talented people, then scammers and crooks attach themselves to it, and it dies filled with mentally ill people.
    1. -1
      31 July 2019 08: 16
      Quote: kalibr
      Any movement is created by geniuses and talented people, then scammers and crooks attach themselves to it, and it dies filled with mentally ill people.

      there were originally scammers and crooks here.
  56. 0
    30 July 2019 14: 11
    and about edra it’s dumb to post an article??? A?? military review
  57. -1
    30 July 2019 16: 15
    There are many parties, but there is no one to choose from.
    Corrupt and crazy.
    Psychics and psychics...
    Orthodox atheists.
    In general, times resemble some kind of debauchery. Then everyone sold the king. I am not justifying Nicholas II, but the transition from the jingoism of 1914 to complete indifference towards the Tsar of all relatives, entourage, army and people - in two and a half years...
    No matter how the “patriots” have driven the country to the brink and sold everything to their adversaries...
  58. -1
    30 July 2019 17: 29
    Zyuganov must go!!! he is the main opportunist. The future belongs to the social democratic idea.
  59. +1
    30 July 2019 18: 34
    I won’t name them by name. Those who want to reconsider the results of the October Revolution and the Civil War can, of course, have local success in the first few days. But history itself is a very stubborn thing. And it will put everything in its place. If I say that I was free under the Soviets, many They will laugh. Many associate freedom with freedom of speech. But I walked around the city day and night, without documents in my hands. And in transport, on trains, ships and intercity buses, I did not have to show documents. Only on airplanes, in case of an accident. So, guys, I don’t know what kind of socialism you are going to build.
  60. -1
    30 July 2019 21: 22
    Guys! Here the author is apparently too young and did not see the formation of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, its ideologists from the KGB and the purposes for which this quasi-party was created.
  61. -1
    31 July 2019 00: 10
    Maybe someone will explain that the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is communist, I read the CPSU Program and did not find the answer for myself!
  62. +1
    31 July 2019 11: 39
    T. Zyu long ago turned the Communist Party of the Russian Federation into a branch of the United Democratic Party, but this was originally intended.
  63. 0
    31 July 2019 14: 22
    Apart from the Communist Party of the Russian Federation itself, no one else has done anything to betray the ideas of communism. Now amazing personalities have appeared in the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, such as a millionaire communist. It seems Zyuganov sold all the ideology for a long dollar and for a pension
  64. -1
    1 August 2019 07: 08
    Everyone is against EDRO!
    Vote for Nikolai Nikolaevich Platoshkin!
  65. +1
    1 August 2019 10: 12
    What's wrong with modern communists?

    Something has been wrong with the communists since 1986, or maybe even since 1956 and all over the world, not only in Russia. The whole problem is that in this form the communists will not be able to prevent the war and they will again have to take power and save the people after the war.
  66. 0
    1 August 2019 17: 10
    On my (personal, non-expert, ordinary person/not a fighter in the propaganda war)Look, the author is 100% right. It’s simply impossible to understand what’s happening to the Communist Party of the Russian Federation with the mind, it’s just a crazy tangle of contradictions and cliches (yes, it’s quite possible that all this is the machinations of enemies... however, what is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation doing to prevent this? Furiously denouncing liars in Internet battles? Well, well) The only thing I want to correct the author is that the problems began not 30 years ago (as witnessed by all sorts of Shevardnadzes, Chubais, Yeltsins... Khrushchevs) but much earlier... perhaps exactly on the day when they decided to “debunk the cult of Personality”,
    If you can just take this as an outside view, or an answer to the question why I am not a member of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation,
  67. 0
    1 August 2019 17: 23
    Quote: aybolyt678
    here ... here systemic steps are needed, ideological. An idea is needed that is close to everyone, And if everything is in state hands and the idea is consumer, then the state will surely get kirdyk

    But here I agree, and I can hint at what the idea is. Stalin's. We need a Stalinist Communist Party (in all possible senses (I remember about 37 and the gulag), I won’t hesitate to join and support, although I’m not going to take the word of those who call themselves “Stalinists”,
    1. +1
      2 August 2019 02: 15
      1. VKPb of the early 30s and early 50s are somewhat different things.
      2. Without competitive political struggle, a party ceases to be a party in the full sense of this definition.
      3. The absence of political struggle and competition is replaced in such a system by the internal party struggle of clans and factions for power. This clearly manifested itself after the death of Stalin, and ultimately led to the events of 91.
      4. Stalin’s personality cult was dispelled by the “Stalinist Communist Party” at the 20th Congress. I believe that the once beloved leader was taken out of the mausoleum by the same “Stalinist” communists.
      5. This turn of events became possible thanks to Stalin himself, who, in the process of party building, made a number of critical mistakes and miscalculations, thanks to which a time bomb was laid under the CPSU.
      1. 0
        2 August 2019 15: 19
        Then to the morgue. So to the morgue. Because the Communist Party has no other symbols of the Communist Party besides Stalin that would suit the entire population.
  68. 0
    1 August 2019 21: 59
    Yes, we all have clowns there, talking heads. It's time to understand. What kind of opposition is there?)))
  69. 0
    2 August 2019 10: 52
    Wasserman calls the Communist Party of the Russian Federation the left Social Revolutionaries, according to their platform.
  70. 0
    2 August 2019 13: 48
    If the party’s program does not contain a provision on the “dictatorship of the proletariat” (the power of the working people, not parasites), then such a party cannot be called communist. The commies have long turned into renegades and sucking democrats, but continue to deceive the workers with populist slogans.

    The term “dictatorship of the proletariat” was excluded from the CPSU program at the suggestion of the unfinished Trotskyist Khrushchev at the XXII Congress (1961), when the party promised to build communism in the country by 1980. There is no thesis about the “dictatorship of the proletariat” in the program of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation since its creation in 1992. It is not surprising that the top of the CPSU, snickering and decaying from impunity, leaked the USSR to the bourgeoisie.
    ***
    Question of the dictatorship of the proletariat. Professor Popov. "Ideological struggle", part 5.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amWRM3iHO8w
  71. 0
    3 August 2019 01: 34
    It's funny to read about percentages. They are drawn in the Kremlin, determining who is entitled to and how much. It’s always like this under a dictatorship - today you have 99%, and tomorrow the crowd will lynch you if you didn’t make it to the plane over the hill.
  72. 0
    3 August 2019 19: 03
    Quote: DarvinDV
    As a proletariat, I can state that the place of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is actually occupied by trade unions, but they are all pocketbooks and are not the government.

    It’s easier to say, we have neither the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, nor trade unions, we have ghouls, not even officials, who at least manage something and are at least responsible for something, well, at least imitate at least some activity due to their squalor, but these are unknown for what and why they exist and are supported for a fabulous monetary allowance, they don’t even engage in imitation of their activities, it’s like housing and communal services stupidly collect money for nothing, without investing anywhere and without producing anything, except, well, everyone knows what, I won’t say, but then I'm already banned.
  73. 0
    6 August 2019 16: 34
    Quote: Tatiana
    Yeah! Lived !!! Communists of the Communist Party to a shame!
    Communists of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation are ideological degenerate liberalists and garbage anarchists, not the Communist Party!

    This fish has long since rotted from the head, starting with the Mymra rooster. This amusing opposition does not evoke any respect or attention.