Underestimating propaganda. Who derailed "tryukhan-mobile"?
We must admit their mistakes. I was wrong in criticizing the “60 Minutes” program and its leaders for giving too large a platform to “respected Ukrainian experts” when they carried pure demagogy, in particular, to Vadim Trukhan.
Everything that Tryukhan inspired carried in the program, he was cast in the elections in Kharkov, which he shamefully lost to the obscure "servant of the people." Because the people knew well what Trukhan was, a banal Banderaman disguised as a “former diplomat”, including thanks to the smiling Skabeyeva and Popov, when they easily trolled Tryukhan.
The pre-election "tryukhan-mobile" has derailed Olga Skabeev in many ways, and it is even more surprising that Tryukhan is again in "60 minutes", and Olga again troll the "respected expert", who almost became a deputy of the Rada thanks to his participation in the popular Russian TV program . Everyone is smiling. Tryukhan smiles at his flight. Generally, how good this expert is: he will soon become an agent of Moscow and personally Scabaeva for his “brotherhoods”, and he seems to have already accepted this fate, becoming somewhat more restrained in the program. What is his "expert opinion"? No more than the victorious Tryuhan "servants of the people."
In general, we underestimate the role of our “propaganda”, which functions are also performed by “60 minutes”. It is really effective, so our foreign partners howl about the “Russian intervention”. Their own intervention shows significantly less effectiveness. It is interesting that our “independent expert commentators” often howl overseas partners, all of whose expertise comes down to labeling successful Russian projects. Here, as it were, they are competing with Western propagandists. Prove that they are cooler, that they draw from one trough and work on one training manual? ..
Of course, our information channels made a great contribution to the crushing defeat of the nationalists in the elections in Ukraine. Together with the information policy of the state. When foreign media and politicians shout about “Russia's unlawful interference in elections,” that in Ukraine, in Europe or in America, they mean the legitimate broadcasting of Russian channels like “RT” and the same “60 minutes” that they watch in USA.
Therefore, American experts say with confidence that “Russian interference in the American elections will continue”: they cannot prohibit the broadcasting of Russian channels from the territory of Russia. In itself, they declare our point of view on events in the world “Russian intervention”. Absurd, but it is adopted by Western propaganda.
Having embarked on the path of the absurd, exposing "trump and Putin's conspiracy" or the widespread "Russian intervention", it is already difficult for his guides to stop, they seem to be going crazy. After all, what could be easier to label and write "conspiracies"? And with their help, they can present anything at all as it suits them! The only difficulty arises when confronted with an inconvenient alternative point of view, which is expressed by "Moscow propagandists" and the American director Oliver Stone. What should humanists and freedom fighters do about it? Prohibit uncomfortable word.
Ukraine, which has banned all Russian channels, social networks on the Internet and Russian cinema, has developed “black lists” of banned “anti-Ukrainian actors” with the help of the Security Service of Ukraine. But all this helps poorly, or rather, does not help at all, because the effect of the forbidden sweet fruit arises, and it is impossible to prohibit the Internet and world information channels. Therefore, "pro-Ukrainian" Sumerian absurdity continues to flow.
In the American media quite seriously argue that the election of Boris Johnson as prime minister of Britain is the work of Putin, Brexit is also the work of Putin, and soon he will ruin Europe and take on the collapse of America! And after all, it will collapse, so "Russian interference in the elections" has already been announced. If anything happens in America, the culprit is already appointed, and that is Putin!
America has one thing: to turn off Russia, and at the same time China’s Internet, if it can. To do this, you can compose historythat the Internet was actually invented by the Russians and insidiously tossed this technology to America in order to decompose it later. What evidence? And who most effectively uses the Internet for "interference", which hackers are the most sophisticated and elusive? That's right, and it's not just like that ...
In general, in the absurdist frenzy people stop noticing the obvious things, the harsh realities of life. In the same Ukraine, by building “anti-Russia”, having sold their Russianness, they are already selling their Ukrainians for the “association” European crab, becoming really “European”, in which the main values will inevitably be gay culture and international English: in “European Sweden is already fighting for the Swedish language! Probably, and this will somehow be explained by the “Russian intervention”.
In flight over the Rada
Everything that Tryukhan inspired carried in the program, he was cast in the elections in Kharkov, which he shamefully lost to the obscure "servant of the people." Because the people knew well what Trukhan was, a banal Banderaman disguised as a “former diplomat”, including thanks to the smiling Skabeyeva and Popov, when they easily trolled Tryukhan.
The pre-election "tryukhan-mobile" has derailed Olga Skabeev in many ways, and it is even more surprising that Tryukhan is again in "60 minutes", and Olga again troll the "respected expert", who almost became a deputy of the Rada thanks to his participation in the popular Russian TV program . Everyone is smiling. Tryukhan smiles at his flight. Generally, how good this expert is: he will soon become an agent of Moscow and personally Scabaeva for his “brotherhoods”, and he seems to have already accepted this fate, becoming somewhat more restrained in the program. What is his "expert opinion"? No more than the victorious Tryuhan "servants of the people."
Propaganda - point of view on anything ...
In general, we underestimate the role of our “propaganda”, which functions are also performed by “60 minutes”. It is really effective, so our foreign partners howl about the “Russian intervention”. Their own intervention shows significantly less effectiveness. It is interesting that our “independent expert commentators” often howl overseas partners, all of whose expertise comes down to labeling successful Russian projects. Here, as it were, they are competing with Western propagandists. Prove that they are cooler, that they draw from one trough and work on one training manual? ..
Of course, our information channels made a great contribution to the crushing defeat of the nationalists in the elections in Ukraine. Together with the information policy of the state. When foreign media and politicians shout about “Russia's unlawful interference in elections,” that in Ukraine, in Europe or in America, they mean the legitimate broadcasting of Russian channels like “RT” and the same “60 minutes” that they watch in USA.
Therefore, American experts say with confidence that “Russian interference in the American elections will continue”: they cannot prohibit the broadcasting of Russian channels from the territory of Russia. In itself, they declare our point of view on events in the world “Russian intervention”. Absurd, but it is adopted by Western propaganda.
“I believe, for it is absurd!”
Having embarked on the path of the absurd, exposing "trump and Putin's conspiracy" or the widespread "Russian intervention", it is already difficult for his guides to stop, they seem to be going crazy. After all, what could be easier to label and write "conspiracies"? And with their help, they can present anything at all as it suits them! The only difficulty arises when confronted with an inconvenient alternative point of view, which is expressed by "Moscow propagandists" and the American director Oliver Stone. What should humanists and freedom fighters do about it? Prohibit uncomfortable word.
Ukraine, which has banned all Russian channels, social networks on the Internet and Russian cinema, has developed “black lists” of banned “anti-Ukrainian actors” with the help of the Security Service of Ukraine. But all this helps poorly, or rather, does not help at all, because the effect of the forbidden sweet fruit arises, and it is impossible to prohibit the Internet and world information channels. Therefore, "pro-Ukrainian" Sumerian absurdity continues to flow.
In the American media quite seriously argue that the election of Boris Johnson as prime minister of Britain is the work of Putin, Brexit is also the work of Putin, and soon he will ruin Europe and take on the collapse of America! And after all, it will collapse, so "Russian interference in the elections" has already been announced. If anything happens in America, the culprit is already appointed, and that is Putin!
Beyond the Absurd
America has one thing: to turn off Russia, and at the same time China’s Internet, if it can. To do this, you can compose historythat the Internet was actually invented by the Russians and insidiously tossed this technology to America in order to decompose it later. What evidence? And who most effectively uses the Internet for "interference", which hackers are the most sophisticated and elusive? That's right, and it's not just like that ...
In general, in the absurdist frenzy people stop noticing the obvious things, the harsh realities of life. In the same Ukraine, by building “anti-Russia”, having sold their Russianness, they are already selling their Ukrainians for the “association” European crab, becoming really “European”, in which the main values will inevitably be gay culture and international English: in “European Sweden is already fighting for the Swedish language! Probably, and this will somehow be explained by the “Russian intervention”.
Information