The head of NASA explained why US astronauts have not landed on the Moon and Mars

243
American astronauts would have landed long ago on the Moon and even on Mars if it were not for the financing problems associated with "political risks." This was told by the head of the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Jim Brydenstein in an interview CBS.

The head of NASA explained why US astronauts have not landed on the Moon and Mars




Answering the relevant question, the head of NASA explained that the return of American astronauts to the moon did not take place because of the "political risks" associated with the financing of the project. According to him, if the US government allocated more funds to space programs, the US astronauts would not only return to the moon, but also land on Mars.

We would already be on the moon if it were not for political risks. Frankly, we would already be on Mars

declared bidenstein.

He noted that NASA had attempted to return to the natural satellite of the Earth and land on the Red Planet in the 90 and early 2000, but the projects were curtailed due to the fact that they required lengthy preparation and substantial funding.

Brydenstein stressed that insufficient funding for NASA programs could lead to the US not being able to land on the moon in the 2024 year.

The new NASA lunar program was named "Artemis" (previous - "Apollo"). It provides for astronauts to land on Earth’s satellite in 2024, although it was originally planned to do this in 2028. The White House has previously announced the acceleration of the landing program on the Moon for five years and the allocation of additional 1,6 billion dollars for the exploration of the Moon and Mars.
243 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +43
    15 July 2019 07: 50
    American astronauts would have landed on the moon a long time ago and even on Mars, if not for funding problems

    The reason is different - the premature death of Stanley Kubrick !!
    If this brilliant director had been alive, the Americans would have "landed" on Venus!
    1. -9
      15 July 2019 07: 52
      Quote: Valery Valery
      Stanley Kubrick's premature demise !!
      You're not tired, okay?
      1. -3
        15 July 2019 08: 14
        Actually, it seems that part of it was filmed in the pavilions (see Hood Film "Capricorn-1").
        But the fact that they flew is a fact beyond doubt.
        And filmed so that there was an "oil painting"
        1. +21
          15 July 2019 09: 58
          Quote: U-58
          Actually, it seems that part of it was filmed in the pavilions (see Hood Film "Capricorn-1").
          But the fact that they flew is a fact beyond doubt.
          And filmed so that there was an "oil painting"

          Of course, the Americans landed on the moon, just as John Kennedy was killed by the lunatic shooter Lee Harvey Oswald ...
          1. +7
            15 July 2019 10: 33
            The fact that there was no flight of American astronauts to the moon and that absolutely all "lunar" footage of the US presence was filmed in a Hollywood studio, Assange told in detail in his WikiLeaks.
            That’s why Assange was arrested! All the other accusations of Assange in his other alleged crimes are just manipulations to get Washington to kill Assange.
            It is for this that the United States demands its extradition from London!
            It is precisely for this that Assandju is facing reprisals in the United States up to the death penalty!

            And this is the video that Assange posted.

            WikiLeaks (JULIAN ASSANGE) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH). Published: May 8 2019
            1. +3
              15 July 2019 10: 50
              this is very funny I didn’t understand at once that you were joking
              1. +2
                15 July 2019 10: 56
                Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                this is very funny I didn’t understand at once that you were joking

                Yes, and I'm not joking! The story of the landing of American astronauts on the moon is very dark and clearly politicized - and above all by the United States itself!

                WikiLeaks and Assange about landing on the moon - Secret video from cut frames!
                Published: May 30 2019
                1. +3
                  15 July 2019 10: 58
                  God, have you watched this video?
                  1. -1
                    15 July 2019 11: 02
                    I watched. And what does it personally change for you?
                    1. +3
                      15 July 2019 11: 04
                      were you embarrassed by the inscription in the beginning?
                      1. +2
                        15 July 2019 11: 09
                        No, of course! laughing Knowing what Washington is capable of, for a long time nothing confuses me from the Americans! Yes
                      2. +2
                        15 July 2019 11: 10
                        where is Washington, I’m telling you about the video from Wikileaks, you are talking about Washington,
                      3. -1
                        15 July 2019 11: 25
                        Despite the fact that such fake shootings do not happen without the knowledge of the US State Department (capital of Washington) and its special services, they are also well paid by the state, i.e. USA. And Nevada is located in the United States.
                      4. +1
                        15 July 2019 11: 28
                        that is, you first take off this video and write that it proves fake flights, now write that these shootings were made by the USA?
                      5. 0
                        15 July 2019 11: 35
                        Firstly, I wrote about Assange.
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        That there was no flight of American astronauts to the moon and that absolutely all the "lunar" footage of the US presence was filmed in a Hollywood studio, it was Assange who spoke in detail in his WikiLeaks.
                        That’s why Assange was arrested! All the other accusations of Assange in his other alleged crimes are just manipulations to get Washington to kill Assange.
                        It is for this that the United States demands its extradition from London!
                        It is precisely for this that Assandju is facing reprisals in the United States up to the death penalty!

                        And this is the video that Assange posted.

                        Secondly. I fully admit that the American astronauts on the moon really were not. Too many things speak for such conclusions from experts. I even think that astronaut Leonov, inexperienced in politics, is completely mistaken in himself that the Americans were allegedly on the moon.
                      6. 0
                        15 July 2019 11: 38
                        Sorry, I'm already a little confused, if you want to discuss this, I'm ready, write what is suspicious of flights for you?
                      7. +1
                        15 July 2019 11: 46
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        What is suspicious of flying for you?

                        The problem is vast. Therefore, I am above the second - overview - video on this topic put up. Everything is said in detail there. You can get acquainted with the opinion of experts and put your comments on it.
                      8. 0
                        15 July 2019 11: 49
                        everything is simple, go to his channel and he has a video about how the USSR and the USA landed together on the moon as the USA flew to Mars, it's just ridiculous and there is nothing to prove
                      9. 0
                        15 July 2019 11: 54
                        Vasiliy! Well, honestly, you are how small! One must still be able to separate cutlets from flies and flies from cutlets in politics! And understand at the same time why everything is done this way and not otherwise! Understand where the truth is, and where is the lie, and why exactly who and what somehow or another the next fake covers up, leveling the initial statement.
                      10. +1
                        15 July 2019 12: 39
                        the most interesting thing is that the video under discussion does not have the slightest relation to asanzh, it’s the channel of the flat-earth workers, in the first frame about flat land, and then a cut from the Nasavian film about the preparation of the landing, and even a piece from Capricorn-1, the burda in general, and not the video, don't look at this trash anymore, and don't advise others
                      11. +1
                        15 July 2019 13: 02
                        Quote: zlinn
                        the most interesting thing is that the video under discussion does not have the slightest relation to asanzh, it’s the channel of the flat-earth workers,

                        But Assange did not pass these shots as his own achievements, but simply presented an overview of various publications on this topic.
                        But what a resonance! And the truth about the flight of US astronauts to the moon and the truth about the policy of the US State Department began to creep out, which is very worthy of discussion !!!

                        So it’s you who are mistaken! This topic in a hybrid war is even relevant for politicians, especially now!
                      12. 0
                        15 July 2019 13: 47
                        what war? what materials were provided by asange and to whom, what does this have to do with the obviously banter video, this video cannot be discussed at all
                      13. +2
                        15 July 2019 17: 31
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        What is suspicious of flying for you?

                        The problem is vast. Therefore, I am above the second - overview - video on this topic put up. Everything is said in detail there. You can get acquainted with the opinion of experts and put your comments on it.

                        I am not for or against. Another question gnaws at me. Why, having all the possibilities for verification, neither the USSR nor the Russian Federation later refuted this story?
                      14. 0
                        16 July 2019 07: 36
                        probably because our state has something to do besides nonsense
                      15. +3
                        15 July 2019 11: 52
                        Any suspicions about flights to the moon can be dispelled in a simple way: present those ill-fated 400 kg. lunar soil that American astronauts like brought back from the moon. But at the moment the Americans have presented several tens of grams. For reference: our UNMANNED "Luna-16" delivered to the ground - 100 grams, and this is more than the Americans!
                        As they say, information for thought !!
                      16. +1
                        15 July 2019 12: 53
                        if I say that all these 400 kg are in my country house, you won’t believe it, because you don’t understand who they were missing somewhere, the soil is less than a hundred grams, but to hundreds of researchers from all over the world, including Soviet and You don’t believe the Russians who studied it and continue to research to this day, and you just don’t know and can donate it absolutely free to almost any university with an appropriate research center, because the real world is boring, it’s much more interesting to live in a fantasy
                      17. 0
                        15 July 2019 13: 14
                        And the fact that the "lunar" soil of the Americans turned out to be almost absolutely similar to the terrestrial - in this situation - also does not lead you to any thoughts?
                      18. +2
                        15 July 2019 13: 31
                        This only proves the theory of a large collision when the protoplanet Thea crashed into the earth after which trillions of tons of rock were thrown into orbit from which the ring first formed and then the moon itself. Therefore, lunar rocks are so similar to terrestrial
                      19. 0
                        15 July 2019 13: 35
                        And it also suggests that the so-called. American astronauts could take "lunar" rocks on Earth.
                      20. +2
                        15 July 2019 13: 54
                        it only means that someone deceived you by providing inaccurate data
                      21. +1
                        15 July 2019 13: 34
                        You would at least read scientific literature or watch programs and not REN TV
                      22. 0
                        15 July 2019 13: 40
                        Yes, at my place there are books on astronomy, the structure of planets, etc. of celestial bodies and on astronautics. At one time, I collected the library on this issue with great interest. It was necessary for scientific research.
                      23. -1
                        15 July 2019 14: 01
                        and then what happened?
                      24. -1
                        15 July 2019 13: 49
                        who told you that? your statement does not coincide with the opinion of authoritative researchers, including Soviet and Russian
                      25. 0
                        15 July 2019 14: 08
                        Quote: zlinn
                        Our statement does not coincide with the opinion of authoritative researchers, including Soviet and Russian

                        And what from this? Everything flows in society, and in science everything changes over time?

                        Let me remind you, for example, the story of the discovery of the Sun-centric system of rotation of the Earth and planets around the Sun! The authority of the church astronomers before that was also indisputable in science!
                        And with the example of the periodic disappearance of the rings of Saturn, one does not have to go far in time! Some scientists, including Soviet ones, in particular, believed that the rings of Saturn completely disappear from time to time somewhere - they almost fall to the surface of Saturn. And they never disappeared anywhere, but simply turned their ring edge in the direction of planet Earth!
                      26. -1
                        15 July 2019 14: 19
                        The fact of the matter is that even American scientists have not seen this soil, it is not studied by anyone, it simply "lies somewhere for future science."
                      27. -2
                        16 July 2019 07: 37
                        it does not lie it is being investigated https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://zelenyikot.livejournal.com/83598.html&ved=2ahUKEwiR-LrszrjjAhWNtIsKHbpmA10QFjAAeg1
                      28. -1
                        15 July 2019 15: 05
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        write what is suspicious of flights for you?
                        The most suspicious is mathematics, or rather, the theory of probability ... Which gives the probability of success of one mission to the moon in the conditions of 1969 at 5%, as the product of the probability of success of all successive stages of flight. This means that only one such flight out of 20 could end in success ... But you can’t argue against numbers ...
                    2. +1
                      15 July 2019 13: 27
                      And do you also trust these online * doctors * from Instagram more than traditional medicine? Treatment methods like drinking rotten water from a rotten stump or yelling in a pillow ?? wassat
      2. +6
        15 July 2019 08: 48
        You're not tired, okay?

        No, but what? Here they directly stated - they have allocated little money. On the F-35, $ ​​1 trillion has already been thrown out, but there was no money to fly to the moon?
        1. -6
          15 July 2019 10: 50
          what trillion can a trillion?
          1. -2
            15 July 2019 14: 26
            what trillion can a trillion?

            "MOSCOW, April 21. (ARMS-TASS). The total cost of the program to create a new generation of stealth fighter F-35 "Lightning-2" (Lightning II) reaches $ 1,3 trillion... This was announced by the head of the program, Lieutenant General Christopher Bogdan. "
            Here is a reference))))
            https://tass.ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/1136666
            1. -2
              16 July 2019 07: 39
              this was considered together with the cost of operating aircraft for life, we have to not scare anyone and laugh only at the Americans, there are no such calculations anywhere, although there would also be a lot
      3. -14
        15 July 2019 08: 48
        Quote: Greenwood
        You're not tired, okay?

        It's funny to watch the desperate attempts of the patriots to "offend" the Americans. I will greatly disappoint you, they deeply do not care about your belief or disbelief, you can even doubt the very fact of the existence of the Americans themselves, they will laugh at it at best, at worst they will not even notice. hi
        1. +11
          15 July 2019 09: 06
          I can tell you that this conspiracy theory was launched by the Americans themselves, and those who do not believe in them are no less than ours
          1. -9
            15 July 2019 09: 17
            Quote: Warrior-80
            the conspiracy theory was launched by the Americans themselves

            In America, there are critinosaurs who still think that the world is on three pillars. Elvis is alive, aliens are among us, and the sun is spinning around the earth and not vice versa. Why then are you so selectively (scrupulously) quoting them? wassat
        2. 0
          15 July 2019 11: 22
          . I will greatly disappoint you, they don’t give a damn about your faith or disbelief,
          ........ as well as Marsopolz for 14 years without maintenance, and solar panels.
          1. 0
            15 July 2019 11: 29
            actually with solar panels he had everything ok if you are about opportunity
        3. +1
          15 July 2019 20: 34
          Quote: Andy
          the very fact of the existence of the Americans themselves will doubt

          belay Who are they?
      4. +1
        15 July 2019 11: 34
        You're not tired, okay?

        Tired of, but no amers lie. So you have to expose. There should be 13 landing steps and all-terrain vehicles on the moon. Where is all this? By the way, their lunar module cannot fly, even theoretically, because it does not have steering engines and a partitioned fuel tank, so that the fuel does not flow in one side. The module should rediscover at the first flight, unlike the Soviet one, which had all this. I took this data on the website http://www.free-inform.narod.ru/
      5. +1
        15 July 2019 13: 08
        Greenwood A "Aren't you tired, well, honestly?"
    2. -1
      15 July 2019 07: 57
      you claim that they filmed it all in the pavilion?
      1. +3
        15 July 2019 09: 05
        Not all, but they finished something. But this does not negate the success of the American lunar program. We do not doubt the truth of the parade on November 7, 1941, although Stalin’s speech was filmed in the pavilion.
        1. -4
          15 July 2019 09: 27
          Quote: AS Ivanov.
          Not all, but they did something

          A documentary was shot in the pavilion about the preparation of the landing of American astronauts on the moon before the landing, the same as, for example, recently and the Curiosity rover before sending it to Mars where pavilions with imitation of Martian soil were also created, etc. ... But what then cheers patriots do not yell that curiosity is not on Mars, all this is filmed in Hollywood, Kubrick, etc. .. But in vain, we missed this opportunitywassat
          1. 0
            15 July 2019 10: 53
            they’re still yelling, and about rovers, and about gemini, and some even about the ISS, they would also shout about the shuttles, but then they would not be able to poke everywhere with the fact that he had killed 14 people
          2. +2
            15 July 2019 11: 05
            actually and about curiosity doubted wondered how he could take a selfie
          3. +1
            15 July 2019 11: 33
            Quote: Andy
            something cheers patriots do not yell that curiosity is not on Mars

            generally yelling that there are gophers on Mars
        2. +7
          15 July 2019 10: 06
          Quote: AU Ivanov.
          Not all, but they finished something. But this does not negate the success of the American lunar program. We do not doubt the truth of the parade on November 7, 1941, although Stalin’s speech was filmed in the pavilion.

          We do not doubt the truth of the parade on November 7, 1941 because it was and tens of thousands of people saw it. And the Americans have not yet provided a single conclusive evidence of their stay on the moon. Moreover, all the evidence presented by them during the verification turns out to be some kind of fake ...
          1. -4
            15 July 2019 10: 11
            Why do you think the Soviet Union did not raise universal gevolt in those years? And did not accuse the States of forgery? Precisely because the Americans flew there. Otherwise, their Soviet media would have long and stubbornly interfered with excrement. Poking the nose of a strategic adversary is priceless.
            1. +5
              15 July 2019 10: 19
              And there are explanations for this, by the way, on the Internet there is a photo of the transfer to our Americans of an empty Apollo capsule found in the Atlantic Ocean ... After another "successful" launch to the Moon ...
              1. -3
                15 July 2019 11: 01
                here, judging by the number of comments on this topic, obviously, she is very interested, but it’s obvious that you don’t know anything about the Apollo program, how is it? so many books, materials, films, studies ...... I do not understand. this once again proves that all conspiracy theorists did not snout in the topics they are trying to judge
            2. 0
              15 July 2019 11: 25
              Therefore, they were silent because they bought wheat at a low price.
              1. 0
                15 July 2019 11: 37
                Feed grain
                1. +1
                  15 July 2019 11: 39
                  We bought wheat of all groups. From solid to fodder. Plus corn.
                  1. 0
                    15 July 2019 12: 00
                    Are we currently able to provide ourselves with grain? Seeds, herbicides? Name productivity, wheat for wheat for years, the USSR reached-300 million tons of grain, due to the area, I agree, but now, where? Hectares stand for years, hundreds and thousands, where do these guys take records?
            3. -1
              15 July 2019 11: 56
              [quote = AS Ivanov.] Why do you think the Soviet Union did not raise universal gevolt in those years? / quote]
              Could exchange silence for a serious nishtyak. The Chinese reported that they did not find any trace at the place of the Americans’ landing.
              1. 0
                15 July 2019 12: 16
                No, they just reported what they found, and the Indians found, and they published a bunch of pictures,
                1. 0
                  15 July 2019 12: 49
                  I did not come across. Links possible?
                  1. +1
                    15 July 2019 13: 25
                    https://global.jaxa.jp/press/2008/05/20080520_kaguya_e.html
                    https://archive.is/20120802135815/www.izvestia.ru/news/news214621
                    https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html
                    it’s so fast, but you can find a lot
                    1. +1
                      15 July 2019 14: 10
                      Thank you But this is stale information from the outside. The data of the Chinese lunar rover is not consistent with amers.
                      1. +1
                        15 July 2019 15: 32
                        look a little more and you will find everything, everything is in order and they did not express any doubts
              2. +2
                15 July 2019 14: 13
                Which nishtyak? The states in those years were the number one ideological adversary and there was no question of any exchange of primacy in the lunar race for nishtyaks. Then any, I emphasize, any cant in the politics and economy of the USA has inflated to the skies in the Union, and here is such a trump card.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. 0
                  15 July 2019 15: 49
                  I disagree. It all depends on the level of nishtyak. 1969 this is the time of confrontation with the PRC, a war with which was by no means excluded. And at the same time, the "warming" of relations with the capitalist began (all sorts of security conferences in Europe ets).
                  1. 0
                    15 July 2019 16: 17
                    And in the 60s, the United States spent almost a trillion dollars on the Lunar Program - translating into current funds, NASA had almost 400000 scientists and engineers, but in the end the program was closed in 73 due to huge expenses - from 63 to 73 there was a war Vietnam, as well as serious US armament with ICBM warheads, submarines and other weapons, in connection with this, food cards were issued to the entire population.
          2. -2
            15 July 2019 10: 18
            Quote: Greg Miller
            all the evidence presented by them during the verification turns out to be some kind of fake ...

            For example? Can you name one?
            1. -2
              15 July 2019 11: 03
              no, of course he won’t name it, conspiracy theorists do not understand these matters, if they would not understand, they would be conspiracy theorists
              1. +2
                15 July 2019 11: 26
                The toilet was wooden on the street, otherwise it would not have flown.
            2. -1
              15 July 2019 13: 24
              You are welcome! At least this trailer! Listen to what these ovic liars say about radiation. 5-7 minutes of time it will take you:
              https://youtu.be/whV0kZN2K88?t=3236
        3. -1
          15 July 2019 11: 11
          Quote: AS Ivanov.
          But this does not negate the success of the American lunar program. We do not doubt the truth of the parade on November 7, 1941, although Stalin’s speech was filmed in the pavilion.

          You do not compare a banana with a finger. Stalin's speech was filmed in the pavilion due to a technical malfunction of equipment, which does not cancel the fact of the parade and the success of the Red Army near Moscow.

          For what reasons they shot the movie about the landing on the moon, we can only guess.
          And all the "non-flights" to the Moon are associated with the perfection of the equipment and just tell the world that someone has landed on the Moon will not work.
          1. +1
            15 July 2019 15: 52
            Do you rule out a malfunction of technology when landing on the moon?
    3. +8
      15 July 2019 08: 05
      Quote: Valery Valery
      The reason is different - the premature death of Stanley Kubrick !!

      And they were on the moon? laughing

      Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
      you claim that they filmed it all in the pavilion?

      That's right. Hollywood rules.
      1. +6
        15 July 2019 10: 04
        Quote: Boris55
        And they were on the moon?

        As soon as a coke is sniffed, it’s also on the Moon, and if they’re even indulging in gerych, then here they will see Mars with Jupiter and Cassiopeia.
      2. +3
        15 July 2019 10: 10
        Quote: Boris55
        And they were on the moon? laughing
        They were on the moon, they were not on the moon, this is not known to science. request
        1. -1
          15 July 2019 11: 03
          science has long known this
          1. -2
            15 July 2019 11: 06
            Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
            science has long known this

            Yah??? Present the American soil to the studio !!! Yes, yes, the one who stole Supermen !!!
            1. 0
              15 July 2019 11: 07
              what superman are you talking about, but I hope you are not banned from Google about the soil? https: //www.google.com/url? sa = t & source = web & rct = j & url = https: //zelenyikot.livejournal.com/83598. html & ved = 2ahUKEwiiwMiIvLbjAhVNwsQBHTe0ArIQFjAAegQIBxAC & usg = AOvVaw1uLf8nomehAagPQAf6_yS1
              1. +2
                15 July 2019 11: 54
                Yeah ... Hold the video laughing
                1. -4
                  15 July 2019 11: 56
                  yes pushkovu trust this diagnosis, especially on TVC
                  1. +1
                    15 July 2019 11: 58
                    Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                    yes pushkovu trust this diagnosis, especially on TVC

                    And do you trust academician Galimov?
                    1. 0
                      15 July 2019 12: 00
                      Do you trust Soviet astronauts?
                      1. +3
                        15 July 2019 12: 05
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        Do you trust Soviet astronauts?

                        Who exactly? Banker Leonov? Not.
                        But the opinion of cosmonaut Afanasyev.
                        R: What do you think about the version that the Americans did not land on the moon?

                        V. A .: I think they did not land. They often say to me: “But what about telemetry?” Telemetry can be removed on Earth, sent to the Moon, the signal will be reflected back. We are shown landing on the moon - motes fly off a little bit. But with that kind of thing, everything had to be in dust. Next: Armstrong almost died during training on Earth. So suddenly everything is smooth. The Japanese probe found no trace of the Americans at the landing site. Moonstones where, who investigated them? Compare the state of astronauts upon returning to Earth. Sevastyanov Nicholas required resuscitation, while the Americans go hearty, smiling. This is how deeply thought out the training should have been? We will know the truth when the Chinese fly to the moon. We somehow try not to go there.

                        http://remarka.city/razdel/gorod/post/viktor_afanasev_polet_na_mars___eto_polet_v_tupik_1298.html
                      2. 0
                        15 July 2019 12: 08
                        it’s very interesting, that is, the astronaut who participated with Apollo you personally called a banker right away, immediately hinting at your predisposition and Afanasyev who wouldn’t be here by anyone?
                      3. +1
                        15 July 2019 12: 11
                        And then there was the cosmonaut Makarov, who declared in the 90s: "It was ordered to assume that they were there."
                      4. -1
                        15 July 2019 12: 14
                        and all, all your evidence, my father says to anyone "so exactly" and what does it mean that everyone who asks him for something is his commander?
                      5. +3
                        15 July 2019 12: 25
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        all your evidence

                        All evidence is exactly the US claims that they were on the moon. By the way, do not forget that Leonov is a friend of the American astronaut Stafford. I remember his interview where he admired the astronaut's salaries, despite the fact that he and Titov, on his return to Earth, spent thousands of rubles on 15 drunk. This is in the seventies, please note.
                      6. 0
                        15 July 2019 12: 29
                        well, do you trust Russian cosmonauts, for example Sergey kud-cricket?
                      7. 0
                        15 July 2019 12: 38
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        well, do you trust Russian cosmonauts, for example Sergey kud-cricket?

                        I generally take for granted all that is said. hi The facts of the Moon mission, which the Americans bring, do not satisfy me. And I am not alone in this opinion.
                        And when the astronauts gathered in December 1972 on Cape Canaveral to observe the last dispatch of the Apollo 17 spacecraft to the moon, I turned to them, but very soon I realized that even those who in everyday life are quite sociable, not in a hurry to satisfy my curiosity. They absolutely did not want to discuss the very essence of my question - their own courage.

                        Such statements from the best journalist of the USA do not satisfy me.
                        https://e-libra.ru/read/401318-bitva-za-kosmos.html
                      8. 0
                        15 July 2019 12: 42
                        well, that is, you do not trust some but trust others, whose "opinion" and not faith coincides with you, okay, okay, I just discussed this topic with you, thanks for the conversation
                      9. +3
                        15 July 2019 12: 50
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        Well, that is, you do not trust one but trust others,

                        Just like you, or any other person. We are with you upholding completely opposite opinions. Could they be on the moon? Yes, they could. Could it be a moon scam? I have the same answer - yes, I could.
                      10. 0
                        15 July 2019 12: 58
                        I understand and I’m not trying to argue with you about this, I just brought up the arguments you answered, I just read that Afanasyev is not such a good example as Leonov, why I already explained, but they better know
                      11. 0
                        15 July 2019 17: 14
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        I understand and do not try to argue with you about this I just gave arguments

                        Sometimes (even in the investigation), the arguments cannot be conclusive evidence. For this, facts and material evidence are more suitable. In the meantime, we have (or do not have wassat ):
                        The absence of vehicles capable of reaching the moon and starting back (such as those that did not have time to take off), the lack of a life support system in the form of a space toilet, the lack of soil, the absence of undeniable video materials, the absence of experiments (actions) on the moon showing the difference in gravity. ..
                        Even the imitation of being in space, the American astronauts failed. I do not think that after an eight-day flight, the conquerors of the moon looked like after a walk on a picnic.
                        Skeptics have more facts than zombies (personally, no one saw, heard, or touched anything) with Hollywood.
                        hi
                      12. -1
                        16 July 2019 07: 34
                        in the year 20 they have to fly a new ship, then about the toilet they have on the new ship (Orion) it is, there is soil (http://www.collectspace.com/resources/moonrocks_goodwill.html), then, what undeniable evidence to you if everything is on the Internet, then there wasn’t Photoshop, there were experiments, at least with a hammer, you bent about imitation, then that they all came out with bruises under the nails doesn’t bother you?
                      13. -1
                        15 July 2019 13: 32
                        Remember how Leonov (a former Cosmonaut) talked about Sernan, who drew the letter "S" with his finger on the moonstone, like "Vasya was here"! Storyteller!
            2. 0
              15 July 2019 11: 29
              In the country of not frightened hemp, the museum had a ksok of moonlight stones. It turned out to be petrified wood.
              1. 0
                15 July 2019 11: 57
                I wrote about it below
                1. 0
                  15 July 2019 11: 58
                  Well, I didn’t get to the point
            3. 0
              15 July 2019 12: 01
              here is http://www.collectspace.com/resources/moonrocks_goodwill.html
      3. +1
        15 July 2019 16: 22
        In the pavilion, even now it is impossible to shoot with high quality - and even more so in the 60s. The clearest example of "Gravity" is a jamb on a jamb, like all other films made in Hollywood, even with the involvement of scientists.
    4. +7
      15 July 2019 08: 12
      that the return of American astronauts to the moon did not take place due to "political risks"

      What Bridenstein Means By "Political Risk"
      It’s normal to bury several tens of billions, into some obviously meaningless military development. A flight to the moon and Mars is a risk
      1. -3
        15 July 2019 08: 15
        no, it's not about that you can listen if you want on NASA's twitter
    5. -3
      15 July 2019 08: 23
      The Kubrick witnesses sect does not sleep)
      1. -7
        15 July 2019 08: 54
        Quote: spirit
        The Kubrick witnesses sect does not sleep)

        In just a few years (+ -) they will land there again, and then, probably, the Chinese .... Is it time to change the record? wassat fool
        1. -1
          15 July 2019 09: 21
          More likely teikonauts. They are somehow more consistent towards the goal.
    6. The comment was deleted.
  2. +6
    15 July 2019 07: 52
    If yes, if mushrooms were growing in the mouth, there would be not a mouth, but a whole garden. How striped love show-offs since the days of the Wild West.
    1. +3
      15 July 2019 08: 04
      Yeah, an article on "if grandma had a dick" laughing
  3. -2
    15 July 2019 07: 55
    just let's not arrange moon moon
    1. +11
      15 July 2019 08: 05
      Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
      just let's not arrange moon moon

      Late, Pandora's Box is open
      1. +5
        15 July 2019 08: 14
        Quote: FenH
        Late, the pandora’s box is open

        laughing good
        1. +2
          15 July 2019 08: 27
          Quote: mordvin xnumx
          Quote: FenH
          Late, the pandora’s box is open

          laughing good

          I'm only interested in one question, where did they store the used diapers, in theory should there be a decent heap on the surface of the moon? request
          1. -6
            15 July 2019 08: 36
            when they first landed, they threw out all the garbage (Apollo 11 landing gear)
            1. +1
              15 July 2019 08: 37
              Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
              when they first landed, they threw out all the garbage (Apollo 11 landing gear)

              Where? And this was done more than once request
              1. -6
                15 July 2019 08: 39
                google Apollo 11 landing gear trash
                1. +3
                  15 July 2019 08: 42
                  Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                  Apollo 11 landing gear trash

                  6 landings were on the moon, everyone sees the flag, but nobody is garbage, is it really strange?
                  1. -4
                    15 July 2019 08: 45
                    I mean, the flag isn’t visible either, and the garbage bag is smaller, well, it’s not very good to remove the waste bag)))
                    1. +1
                      15 July 2019 08: 49
                      Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                      I mean, the flag isn’t visible either, and the garbage bag is smaller, well, it’s not very good to remove the waste bag)))

                      Garbage should be bigger and more visible, but it isn’t? request
                      1. -2
                        15 July 2019 08: 49
                        he is all in these bags
                      2. +2
                        15 July 2019 08: 50
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        he is all in these bags

                        So where are the bags? 6 lunches and one bag
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. +1
                        15 July 2019 08: 54
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        https://fstoppers.com/originals/first-photograph-taken-moon-neil-armstrong-featured-trash-bag-243698

                        one bag, after 6 missions, are you serious ????
                      5. -2
                        15 July 2019 09: 17
                        did you translate the text?
                      6. +1
                        15 July 2019 09: 23
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        did you translate the text?

                        yes, but there’s a lot written on the barn too, and there’s firewood request
                        there is a photo of the flag, but there is no garbage, or did they drag it away and dig it up?
                      7. -3
                        15 July 2019 09: 31
                        Yes, damn it, you are not talking about this at all, you asked why there was only one photo with garbage, it was written there, because it was the first photo on the moon and they would not photograph garbage later and were not going to, he just got on camera and that's it
                      8. +2
                        15 July 2019 09: 36
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        Yes, damn it, you are not talking about this at all, you asked why there was only one photo with garbage, it was written there, because it was the first photo on the moon and they would not photograph garbage later and were not going to, he just got on camera and that's it

                        like each subsequent expedition, didn’t carry the camera with you and didn’t take pictures?
                      9. -4
                        15 July 2019 09: 38
                        yes ё ma ё https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/ look for yourself
                      10. 0
                        15 July 2019 09: 47
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/

                        http://www.planetology.ru/panoramas/lunokhod1.php?language=russian с тем же результатом,но без утверждения ,что советские космонавты были на луне
                        Py Sy-Minus are not mine
                      11. -3
                        15 July 2019 09: 48
                        Well, there was a lunar rover)))
                      12. 0
                        15 July 2019 09: 52
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        Well, there was a lunar rover)))

                        Byl. And what is still strange, the remaining 6 expeditions did not leave their mark, you will find photos of only the first astronauts, it is on the moon
                      13. -3
                        15 July 2019 09: 56
                        do not quite understand
                      14. +1
                        15 July 2019 09: 57
                        there is a photo, only the first astronauts, for the other astronauts they are not
                      15. -3
                        15 July 2019 10: 01
                        if not then I threw you a link, or it doesn’t open for you?
                      16. 0
                        15 July 2019 10: 03
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        if not then I threw you a link, or it doesn’t open for you?

                        there are only panoramic pictures of the moon. And the flag has only the first crew, 2 of 12 people
                      17. -3
                        15 July 2019 10: 04
                        you look, I immediately found at least Apollo 15 at least 16, and so on.
                      18. 0
                        15 July 2019 10: 10
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        you look, I immediately found at least Apollo 15 at least 16, and so on.

                        The module has, the equipment has, the flag does not request In theory, it should be one of the first
                        17 have, but the flag flutters. In airless space ???
                      19. -2
                        15 July 2019 10: 12
                        you looked straight at all the photos, well, then I don’t know, maybe they didn’t take pictures, although it’s unlikely, maybe there is a module from the camera?
                      20. -3
                        15 July 2019 10: 15
                        https://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/frame/?AS17-134-20386 вот нашел , это Аполлон 17
                      21. The comment was deleted.
                      22. The comment was deleted.
                      23. +1
                        15 July 2019 10: 34
                        Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                        Well, there was a lunar rover)))

                        And why was that? What is he? Evaporated from the surface of the moon? Lunatics stole? Soviet moon rovers:
                        Luna-2 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 23 24

                      24. -3
                        15 July 2019 10: 47
                        you did not understand our correspondence
                      25. +1
                        15 July 2019 10: 50
                        And how do you understand this? recourse
                      26. -1
                        15 July 2019 11: 02
                        I gave a link where there is a photo of what they photographed, after which my opponent dropped the link about moon rovers and wrote that this was not proof of the USSR landing, I wrote because there was a moon rover and not people, after you met in a conversation
                      27. +1
                        15 July 2019 11: 13
                        Vasily, are you good at photo / movie maker?
                      28. -2
                        15 July 2019 11: 15
                        are you alright
                2. +4
                  15 July 2019 08: 46
                  Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                  google Apollo 11 landing gear trash

                  The most famous US journalist was unable to spin astronauts for an interview about the Moon missions.
                  1. +2
                    15 July 2019 10: 47
                    Volodya, hi they were simply ashamed to admit where they had put their waste products. wink
                    1. +1
                      15 July 2019 10: 51
                      Quote: sabakina
                      Volodya, hi they were simply ashamed to admit where they had put their waste products. wink

                      Yes, well ... How did their very first astronaut get into a pant leg and then hesitate? Here, Mlyn, shy ...
                      1. +4
                        15 July 2019 11: 00
                        Volodya, I'm not talking about that. With brown matter and yellow water in trouser legs to ride on the moon? I remember in childhood, on the way from the village (we went to the cinema to watch a movie) to the sanatorium, SUCH DRISCH got me through !!! It’s unpleasant to remember so far. And there are shots where these astronauts are eating their favorite steak before flying. And indeed they ate, as if for the last time ....
                      2. 0
                        15 July 2019 11: 16
                        Quote: sabakina
                        And indeed they ate like the last time ....

                        Vladislav, read The Battle for Space. Very entertaining reading. As soon as these astronauts were not bullied before flights. They even ran around with explosives in their ass in the medical center.
                        In Conrad, only the usual hospital pajamas, with a slit in the back. The hose leading to this damn ball is so short that you have to hunch strongly to carry it in front of you. And the ass, as they say, trembles in the wind - with a tube sticking out. On the orderly red cowboy boots. Konrad especially clearly sees them, because he bent so much that his gaze rests on the foot of a medic at the calf level. Hunched up, with a trembling ass in the wind, he mince, like a crab, behind a pair of red cowboy boots. They are walking along the corridor — a dazed hunchback and red cowboy boots — past men, women, children, nurses, orderlies… Red cowboy boots begin to trot. The nurse is not. He has done this before. He went through the whole nightmare. He saw explosions. Now the main thing is time! Behind - hunched sticks of dynamite. But every step is given to Conrad more difficult. They go down the elevator, full of normal people, and then make a crazy tango on another corridor, in terrible stress, before they find this damned outhouse.

                        https://e-libra.ru/read/401318-bitva-za-kosmos.html
          2. +3
            15 July 2019 09: 21
            https://topwar.ru/99530-o-proze-zhizni-v-missiyah-apollo.html
            drop dead article
          3. 0
            15 July 2019 11: 36
            Quote: FenH
            I'm only interested in one question, where did they store the used diapers, in theory should there be a decent heap on the surface of the moon?

            awesome topic - lunar feces of astronauts
      2. 0
        15 July 2019 09: 38
        Quote: FenH
        The Fourth Most Popular Topic

        Read the entire list, please hi
        1. +2
          15 July 2019 11: 14
          hi Israel, Putin, Ukraine
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. -1
        15 July 2019 08: 10
        in fact, they are not so bad, for example, thanks to them I learned a lot about space technology and became interested in space
        1. +2
          15 July 2019 08: 44
          Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
          I learned a lot about space technology and became interested in space

          So the time has come for you to become interested in cosmic radiation and why a living organism cannot survive outside the protective field of the Earth. A ship that could protect a person from cosmic radiation has not been and never has been.

          1. -3
            15 July 2019 08: 47
            then it’s time for you to learn about radiation and how it was investigated by animals
            1. +4
              15 July 2019 08: 48
              Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
              then it’s time for you to learn about radiation and how it was investigated by animals

              Within the protective field of the Earth (see. Fig.).
              1. -3
                15 July 2019 08: 51
                Yes, I know, but outside the Earth's orbit, the value of radiation increases slightly
                1. +6
                  15 July 2019 08: 54
                  Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                  outside the Earth's orbit, the value of radiation increases slightly

                  Blessed is he who believes. Until hi
                  1. -4
                    15 July 2019 08: 58
                    why does he believe that they’ve been flying to the ISS for years and nothing, but like 12 days to the moon and back, it’s impossible right away, I’ll find links now, wait
                    1. +3
                      15 July 2019 09: 05
                      Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                      on the ISS for years fly and nothing

                      See the picture and the place where the orbit of the ISS. laughing
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. -1
                        15 July 2019 09: 32
                        so I wrote about animals
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                    2. +1
                      15 July 2019 11: 18
                      Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
                      why does he believe that they’ve been flying to the ISS for years and nothing, but like 12 days to the moon and back, it’s impossible right away, I’ll find links now, wait

                      Vasily, are you laughing at us or British scientists? Dress yourself a diaper and walk in it for 12 days! laughing
                      1. +1
                        15 July 2019 11: 25
                        you know how it all began, at first everyone thought why the flag is swinging, where the stars in the photo, when these questions answered were weirder, now it comes to diapers, damn they slept in diapers and that they even shaved there or do you think that they are not could fly because they have nowhere to go?
              2. 0
                15 July 2019 16: 28
                The largest level of radiation is formed just at the boundary of the magnetic field - since shielding - accumulation - for humans and animals, it is not radiation itself that is dangerous, but its absorbed dose.
            2. +1
              15 July 2019 09: 19
              At the same time, how radiation affects various animals
          2. +2
            15 July 2019 09: 24
            You are not quite right in mentioning the radiation belts of Van Alen. I recommend comparing the quotes below and the thickness of the hull of the Apollo ship.
            To a first approximation, the radiation belt is a toroid in which two areas stand out:
            internal radiation belt at an altitude of ≈ 4000 km, consisting mainly of protons with energies of tens of MeV;
            external radiation belt at an altitude of ≈ 17 km, consisting mainly of electrons with energies of tens of keV.

            Alpha radiation is a stream of alpha particles - helium-4 nuclei. Alpha particles generated by radioactive decay can be easily stopped with a piece of paper. Beta radiation is the flux of electrons produced by beta decay; To protect against beta particles with energies up to 1 MeV, an aluminum plate with a thickness of several millimeters is enough.
          3. +2
            15 July 2019 11: 20
            from where do you get all this blizzard? there is a bunch of published, scientific articles on radiation in space, in van alen belts and beyond and all the way to Mars, and about Soviet turtles flying around the moon and Soviet measurements from probes, but you still don’t carry to the masses understand that
            1. 0
              15 July 2019 11: 32
              even the only person on this forum is normal
            2. -4
              15 July 2019 15: 50
              from where do you get all this blizzard? there is a bunch of published, scientific articles on radiation in space, in van alen belts and beyond and all the way to Mars, and about Soviet turtles flying around the moon and Soviet measurements from probes, but you still don’t carry to the masses understand that

              Have you read them? There you start to read - and all the data is only from the mathematical calculations. )))
              But all the calculations should be checked properly - it would seem easier - flied, measured the radiation - so much and so much for you. But this is not, no one measured it - everyone continues to believe in the word.
              Meanwhile, even astronauts on the ISS, being protected by the Earth's magnetic field, receive a good dose of radiation during the time spent on board.
              The ship, with protection from solar radiation, should have a skin thickness of 5 cm of lead, not counting the hull itself. Korolev perfectly understood the dimensions and weight of the ship with anti-radiation protection, as well as the fact that sending it to the moon and back, simply did not stretch the technology and engines of those years.
              )))))
              1. 0
                15 July 2019 16: 30
                and therefore created this very ship without any 5-inch protection (from where are these numbers?)
                and this very probe (future union) flew to the moon, took measurements of radiation, rolled turtles, and all these data are there, but the math calculations there are just to the fact that the levels are not constant and require modeling based on available measurements
              2. 0
                15 July 2019 16: 32
                "Meanwhile, even the astronauts on the ISS, being protected by the Earth's magnetic field, receive a good dose of radiation during their time on board." - And for how long and what dose do they receive there - in more detail?
                1. -2
                  15 July 2019 16: 54
                  And for what time and what dose do they get there - in more detail?

                  Something like this :
                  "On average, a person living on Earth who does not deal with sources of radiation, annually receives a dose of 1 millisievert (mSv). An astronaut on the ISS earns 0,5-0,7 mSv. Daily! "
                  Details
                  https://www.popmech.ru/technologies/385422-kosmicheskaya-radiaciya-chto-eto-takoe-i-opasno-li-dlya-cheloveka/
        2. +1
          15 July 2019 11: 02
          Quote: Vasily Ponomarev
          in fact, they are not so bad, for example, thanks to them I learned a lot about space technology and became interested in space

          Are you talking about Soviet moon rovers?
      2. +4
        15 July 2019 08: 14
        Quote: pru-pavel
        Why are you attempting to moonlight? This is our bond. The Americans were not on the moon. All Russian patriots know this.

        Are you a patriot of a nation?
      3. -1
        15 July 2019 08: 16
        But do non-patriots know this?
        Some kind of leavened patriotism ..
      4. -5
        15 July 2019 09: 08
        Quote: pru-pavel
        This is our bond

        It’s not just some kind of brace there, it’s the most TSARSCREP, that is fundamental wassat if, nevertheless, when it doesn’t finally break under the yoke of facts and, most importantly, common sense, then it’s all ... kayuk to everything ... all the rest of the identities hi
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +2
    15 July 2019 08: 05
    Dad, buy a bun. Son, I also want a bun. But there’s only enough money for vodka ...
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 08: 06
      next year start, let's see
  5. +9
    15 July 2019 08: 19
    The head of NASA explained why US astronauts have not landed on the Moon and Mars
    The clouds are low, the wind is strong and the weather is generally FLIGHT
    1. +4
      15 July 2019 08: 41
      And most importantly, give more money.
      1. +3
        15 July 2019 08: 42
        Quote: cniza
        And most importantly, give more money.

        Well, where without it. This condition number is ONE
  6. 0
    15 July 2019 08: 22
    Moon, Mars, Venus ... other things - without gravitsapa or other, similar, ways of moving in space, it will always be "navel tearing". Especially in the capitalist model.

    A moving machine is needed, otherwise deep space is in antitenture ... laughing
  7. +6
    15 July 2019 08: 23
    It only seems to me that only vehicles with electric rocket (plasma) engines and their corresponding power plant will fly freely in space ... And all these chemical missiles will not really be allowed to develop beyond the moon. Fly 500 days to Mars? Well, this is for people - not seriously ... One way ticket. The reverse is how?
    And the Americans screwed up with their plasma engine ... While the best in the world are doing in ... Russia. Development MIREA, produced in Kaliningrad. 10 kW already mastered ...
    1. +1
      15 July 2019 20: 34
      He will complete his reusable BFR mask - then he will master the moon and take Mars for himself.
  8. +4
    15 July 2019 08: 33
    Answering the corresponding question, the head of MASA explained that the return of American astronauts to the moon did not take place ......
    In order not to return, there was no need to leave.
    And on the account that there is no money, I beg you!
    Elon Musk to help you.
    He on his adventures how many billions scraped together?
    And then some miserable 1.5 can not be found.
    These are funny Americans.
    If their own lies seem to them true, then it does not occur to the Americans that the rest do not believe them.
    1. -2
      15 July 2019 10: 53
      blame the Americans stupid although they wrote themselves complete nonsense
      1. +3
        15 July 2019 11: 45
        Dear Vasily.
        I can’t blame anyone.
        Especially in stupidity.
        It was said about a lie.
        I wrote that Americans complain about the lack of long-term financing in the amount of 1.5 billion dollars.
        Those. Do they think everyone else should believe it?
        Have you seen the budget of the US Defense Ministry?
        Are you aware of the budget of venture funds?
        Yes, with such manners, they would not have collected 1.5 but 115 billions.
        It's just an excuse.
        Designed for dumbheads, such as themselves.
        Now blame it.
        And you shouldn’t be the lawyer for these guys.
        They won’t give money.
  9. -8
    15 July 2019 08: 34
    Why does NASA have a small wage gap between the head and design engineers? And we have thousands of times ...
    1. -3
      15 July 2019 08: 50
      Why does NASA have a small wage gap between the head and design engineers? And we have thousands of times ...

      Because the head of NASA is a talking head, he decides nothing .....
    2. +1
      15 July 2019 09: 18
      Can I submit a confirmation?
      Or again a bunch in a puddle?
  10. +1
    15 July 2019 08: 45
    Brydenstein stressed that insufficient funding for NASA programs could lead to the US not being able to land on the moon in the 2024 year.


    The White House previously announced the acceleration of the program of landing a man on the moon for five years and the allocation for the development of the moon and Mars


    They would have rattled fewer weapons all over the world and would have poked their noses into the internal affairs of the countries of the world with their "democracy" less, you look and would have reached Saturn am fool
  11. +3
    15 July 2019 08: 49
    We would already be on the moon if it were not for political risks. Frankly, we would already be on Mars
    Yes, what's on Mars. The open spaces of the universe would have long plowed colonizing other galaxies. Something always disturbs a useless dancer. What-what, and the Americans learned to cheat and puff up from their importance.
    1. +1
      15 July 2019 09: 23
      by the way !! but what about democracy on the alpha centaur ??
  12. +2
    15 July 2019 08: 54
    because they steal, therefore they cannot lol
  13. 0
    15 July 2019 09: 03
    Dmitry Olegovich is resting.
  14. +1
    15 July 2019 09: 12
    Were the Americans on the moon or not? Proving is very simple and painless for the USA. Let them show at least one lunar pebble at least 100 g. In Chelyabinsk, in a museum under a glass lies a cobblestone - a meteorite that invigorates in the morning. And note that no one argues that this is a meteorite and does not require evidence. And the USA has several centners of such cobblestones! If ours had not been exposed to this meteorite, I’m sure that the West would accuse Russia of bombing its cities!
    1. +3
      15 July 2019 09: 24
      already! already stated that all the soil - 400 kg lost
      1. -2
        15 July 2019 10: 54
        can show a link please
        1. -1
          15 July 2019 11: 44
          Well, at least. inquisitive and still find ... about the Dutch to remind? https: //www.km.ru/front-projects/amerikanzi-nikogda-ne-letali-na-lunu/pochemu-nasa-pryachet-lunnyi-grunt-ot-vsego -mira
          1. 0
            15 July 2019 11: 45
            about the Dutch it has long been written, but there was not 400 kg
            1. -1
              15 July 2019 11: 48
              yes, there was just a fake ... at what level !! and yet - the most delicious - regolith everywhere ... and where is the substance of the cobblestones that the automatic stations just deliver and cannot :?
              1. -1
                15 July 2019 11: 51
                fake is it, and if you knew this, you know that there was no such stone in NASA’s database, now it’s a long time to search, but there’s a site where there is a photo of all the stones that they brought
                1. 0
                  15 July 2019 13: 29
                  WHERE ARE THEY NOW!!!
    2. -2
      15 July 2019 10: 55
      you yourself can ask them why they do it
    3. 0
      15 July 2019 11: 27
      So they are exhibited in a pile of museums, including in Moscow
  15. +3
    15 July 2019 09: 45
    In 1983, we were on an excursion in Star City. Were at the local museum of cosmonautics and asked a question about why we did not fly to the moon? But the point is not that, but that no one denied there, yes, at that time no one disputed their flight.
    And yet, explain to me a layman - if they buy engines from us, and the rocket should be heavy, then what did they fly on and are going to fly again? Are there any specialists in this matter? Explain.
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 10: 55
      they not only fly on our engines
    2. +2
      15 July 2019 11: 35
      The answer is simple, they buy Rolls-Royce engines for Boeing, but that doesn’t mean that they don’t have their Pratt & Witney and GE engines, only Atlas 5 and Antares use Soviet-American engines, but Falcon deltas and Pegasus fly on their own, and fly many more, and there are engines from the shuttles, they’ll actually have their lunar rocket flying, and a heavy Falcon in a two-start scheme will be able to, and there are a couple more racquets from the mask and bezos
  16. 0
    15 July 2019 10: 03
    Quote: Andy
    Quote: Greenwood
    You're not tired, okay?

    It's funny to watch the desperate attempts of the patriots to "offend" the Americans. I will greatly disappoint you, they deeply do not care about your belief or disbelief, you can even doubt the very fact of the existence of the Americans themselves, they will laugh at it at best, at worst they will not even notice. hi

    Let's see how they will laugh when we stop delivering them to the RD-180. Their entire cosmic program will then end with both the Moon and Mars. Then we will laugh. tongue
    1. +1
      15 July 2019 11: 50
      I’m just wondering who and when launched this duck, that without the rd-180, the Americans are fsio, well, they flew on something, and I know for sure what, until 2001, and most importantly they continue to fly today mainly (80% ) on his own,
    2. +1
      15 July 2019 12: 25
      and it’s the loudest to laugh at the masks, but he’ll just sniff at joys, but not for long he will laugh at the be-4 is almost ready, and there’s still enough reserve of 28 YULA engines for another 6-7 years
    3. 0
      15 July 2019 16: 35
      Well, yes - and Bezos with his BE 4 and Musk with his Raptor will immediately rush into the matter - they will have a normal flight - but our RD 180 manufacturers do not.
  17. +1
    15 July 2019 10: 10
    Quote: Diversant Holuy
    Why does NASA have a small wage gap between the head and design engineers? And we have thousands of times ...

    Interesting! And NASA, did you personally receive data on your earnings?
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 10: 56
      everything is on the Internet
    2. +2
      15 July 2019 11: 51
      they publish them
  18. -2
    15 July 2019 11: 07
    And indeed the whole galaxy would have been conquered ... If the conqueror in the pants had not been lost
  19. -1
    15 July 2019 11: 17
    [quote] [/ quote] But the fact that they flew is a fact beyond doubt .... Yeah, and they went to the toilet in the street.
    1. +1
      15 July 2019 12: 27
      you are tired with the toilets, to spoil a bag is certainly not very convenient, but not fatal
  20. +1
    15 July 2019 11: 23
    The Americans were not on the moon.
    Fort Knox has no gold in the declared amount.
    Kennedy did not kill Lee Harvey Oswald.
    hi
  21. 0
    15 July 2019 12: 39
    )) question. who will let them go there))? they on earth cannot behave like people ... but let them go to the moon or Mars .. so generally quarrel with everyone!
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 13: 01
      how our poor cosmonauts live with them on the ISS and are friends afterwards, probably through force
  22. -2
    15 July 2019 13: 15
    There is no 100% proof - this is a fact. There is telemetry of the Apollo flights, which could be carried out automatically (including the imaginary conversations of the crews with the central control unit, in the form of a radio performance recorded on a tape recorder and included according to the program of a specially developed script.)
    As already indicated, such evidence could be a transfer to the antagonistic state (USSR / Russia) for the study of moonstone with a mass beyond the limits of capture by automatic stations. This has not been done so far, even against the background of permanent accusations of lying and falsification by the entire world community (including America’s taxpayers). What is stopping you ?. The answer is obvious - fake stones.
    Then there are two options. Either they simply didn’t bring the stones (well, you never know .. they didn’t pull in the mass or something), or there was no one to carry.
    In short, until I myself fly off, and see what is trampled there before me - I won’t believe it :)
    shl. By the way .. the option that the amerikashki paid the USSR for silence on proven falsification is not excluded. Somehow, relations between our countries warmed up very much after the Apollo "lunar missions".
    1. -1
      15 July 2019 14: 13
      the USSR as well as Russia received as much as requested, and will receive more if it asks, but scientists do not need it, they have no doubt about flights
  23. -1
    15 July 2019 13: 24
    Because they weren’t even storytellers on the moon. laughing !!!
  24. -1
    15 July 2019 13: 39
    I read all these comments and understand that people have degraded to the fullest with us. education in ... opera, you will soon prove that not only were you not on the moon, but the earth is flat (by the way, we already have a lot of them) and anti-vaccines will run up. and yes, at least zamusnuyte wither death, but the truth will not change from this.
  25. 0
    15 July 2019 13: 46
    Let nasa first find the originals of the moon landing record)
    1. 0
      15 July 2019 16: 37
      Already found - and the original, which was not sold at auction.
      1. 0
        16 July 2019 12: 46
        Nasa has already stated that this is not the original, so there are no entries.
  26. 0
    15 July 2019 18: 37
    Quote: zlinn
    the USSR as well as Russia received as much as requested, and will receive more if it asks, but scientists do not need it, they have no doubt about flights

    (C)
    July 1969 Apollo 11 astronauts allegedly bring 20 kg of lunar soil. The USSR does not give anything out of this amount. At this moment, the USSR has no lunar soil.
    .
    September 1970 Our Luna-16 station delivers lunar soil to Earth, and from now on, Soviet scientists have something to offer in exchange. This puts NASA in a difficult position. But NASA expects that at the beginning of 1971 it will be able to automatically deliver its lunar soil to Earth, and counting on this in January 1971, an exchange agreement has already been concluded. But the exchange itself does not occur for another 10 months. Apparently, something went wrong in the USA with automatic delivery. And the Americans are starting to pull the rubber.
    .
    July 1971. In good faith, the USSR unilaterally transfers to the USA 3 g of soil from Luna-16, but receives nothing from the USA, although an exchange agreement was signed six months ago, and NASA allegedly contains 96 kg of lunar soil (from Apollo 11, Apollo 12 and Apollo 14). Another 9 months pass.
    .
    April 1972. Finally, NASA passes a sample of lunar soil. It was allegedly delivered by the crew of the American ship Apollo 15, although 15 months have passed since the flight of Apollo 1971 (July 8). By that time, 173 kg of moonstones (from Apollo 11, Apollo 12, Apollo 14 and Apollo 15) were allegedly already in NASA’s pantries.
    .
    Soviet scientists get a certain sample from these riches, the parameters of which are not reported in the Pravda newspaper. But thanks to Dr. M.A. We know Nazarov that this sample consisted of regolith and did not exceed 29 g by weight.
    .
    It is very likely that until about July 1972, the United States did not have any real lunar soil at all. Apparently, somewhere in the first half of 1972, the Americans got the first grams of real lunar soil, which was delivered from the moon automatically. Only then did NASA show a willingness to exchange.
  27. +1
    15 July 2019 21: 07
    As in the famous proverb about the dancer ...
    In short, a lot of things interfere with a good astronaut.
  28. -3
    15 July 2019 23: 46
    And in continuation, in order to burn your p-ki, if you were not on the moon, then Gagarin was not the first in space.
    This is all b. The Strugatsky wrote.

    well or so, the Americans made a fundamental contribution to the victory over fascism (please excuse me, I really apologize to you, for I can’t repeat it) if the Americans were not on the moon. facts please.
  29. +1
    16 July 2019 10: 34
    I'd like to ask would-be commentators: do you guys have AT LEAST some kind of technical education? Even the modern state of science and technology makes it impossible to fly EVEN to some moon (only radiation belts are worth something!)! Cosmonauts do not "fly" in space - they "fly" in near-earth space !!! T.N. flights to the moon (100% success) - the usual cutting of Americans' money in collusion with the USSR for certain preferences. And most of the comments are the fuss of a certain subspecies of beetles on a well-known heap ... In the net you can find what the so-called " spacesuits for the striped ones. Where is at least some video about the flights themselves, about docking, orbital corrections, lunar landing, launches, splashdowns, etc. etc. It should be at least tens to hundreds of hours. Where on the descent module was the tarantay, on which the super-astronauts were dissected, supposedly on the moon? And photographic and film technology is generally an idiotic absurdity (super-film in a super-case) !!! In general, I do not even want to stutter about the rocketry itself - this is for specialists ... And the so-called. flight results: disappeared (!), stolen (!), disappeared (!), evaporated (!)? Until now, more and more specialists appear who lick everything and everyone over the hill - they do not include brains at all. It is appropriate to give an example of September 11 here: they turned everything over themselves, blamed it on some kind of terror. The crowd swallowed everything. Oil painting !!!
    1. +1
      16 July 2019 12: 32
      There is also a fairly extensive one - the Americans flew to the moon, this is confirmed by numerous documentary chronicles of how the devices for the moon were created and tested, "The usual cut of Americans' money in collusion with the USSR for certain preferences." Well, yes, preferences - in the most tense time of relations between the USSR and the United States - the war in Vietnam and the massive replenishment of nuclear weapons arsenals throughout the 60s. You rub this garbage about a conspiracy with fabulous preferences for the USSR mentally retarded. The radiation belts are worthless - only the effective absorbed dose by a person is worth.
      1. -1
        16 July 2019 16: 27
        That is, it is enough to show a film that you are testing the apparatus for the moon - and no evidence is needed ?? Are you out of your mind?
      2. -1
        16 July 2019 16: 32
        Apparently the Americans thought so too, but they were mistaken. Time slowly puts everything in its place:
        - Armstrong and his comrades did not see the stars while on the moon. I repeat, they did not see the stars themselves (do not drag the absence of stars in the photographs here);
        - Armstrong saw the "charcoal" soil of the Moon, while its real color is brown;
        - Armstrong and his comrades showed themselves in incredibly excellent physical shape upon their return "from the moon", while the Soviet cosmonauts experienced serious problems after landing, even heart problems. It looks like they were returning from different spaces
  30. -1
    16 July 2019 16: 45
    Some technical difficulties have not yet been resolved. There’s nothing to argue about. Americans began to manipulate people's opinions a very long time ago, and this imaginary flight to the moon is simply a continuation of their experience in dusting brains. After that, they shot such videos - a great many. Especially those where their opponents vilify.
  31. The comment was deleted.